“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.
“Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually, then suddenly.”
Last year during a family event at my step-daughter’s college, I noticed that her TV was unplugged. We had given it to her for her dorm room. She didn’t have a cord to hook it up to cable. Instead of going out their way to buy a cord, she and her roommate just never bothered using it. In lieu of traditional television, they watch Youtube videos, use various social media platforms, and watch Netflix on their respective laptops. I asked her if she knew anyone her age who watched cable television and she couldn’t think of anyone. The year my stepson lived with us while he attended his senior year of high school, I noticed that he never watched traditional live television either. He played video games, watched Youtube videos and some Netflix, and used social media platforms. The only traditional television Sloopy and I watch are various sporting events. Outside of that, I watch Youtube videos, listen to podcasts, and read through Twitter. (I have been banned from posting on Twitter. Sloopy has not despite trolling people far worse than I ever did). The only people I know in my life who watch traditional television outside of sports is my mother and step-father. Even my father spends his free time watching Youtube videos and playing around online.
Traditional corporate media is dying. At first, it felt gradual, now it feels sudden. Not just newspapers, but television, movies, even corporate digital media is crumbling before our eyes. I would even add major corporate social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter onto the list as well. The death spiral is understandable. The age of centralized media, centralized narratives, centralized culture, and hence centralized power is done. The question now is: what will the effects be?
Scott Adams describes the current political landscape as like having one movie screen with two different movies playing on it. Half the country sees an evil bigoted man who stole the election by conspiring with Russia. Everything is going in the wrong direction as this evil usurper is allowing the rich to continue to exploit the poor and downtrodden and has given license to the evil white supremacists secretly living amongst them to hate crime. The other movie is an economic golden age with the evil deep state trying to take out the man who is defying them. Each news story that breaks is proof of each side’s version of the world. The two movies/two realities are the result of a split in primary consumption of news media. Those that follow right-wing news and those that follow left-wing news consume a different culture and a different reality.
Now what will happen when the media splits even further? What happens when it splits to a million separate cultures? Instead of two political realities, will we have millions? Will we reach an anarchist state? Will the US fraction into a million separate countries, will the power become decentralized again back to the states and individual counties, cities? Centralized media has allowed for the centralization of power. Two entities vying for control can work as long as they share core tenets, but what happens when they both no longer share the same core tenets due to consumption of different media? And what happens when the media decentralizes further and further until it is in the thousands or even millions? How can one government control such a large geographical area and vast populace when culture, reality, and basic fundamental principles are no longer shared?
Maybe I am mistaken, but doesn’t it feel like a mass disillusionment is taking place? I have never witnessed in my life so much general distrust from everyone from all corners of life. I have no idea what the future will bring, but whatever it is, we are in the midst of a massive and sudden change.
Yep – my kid rarely watches regular TV.
Define “regular TV”. Any content not being streamed?
Alex
I donno. I don’t watch streamed content either. So I can’t tell the difference.
Yes – anything with commercials.
If adblock takes away the youtube commercials, what does that make it?
Depends? You know, the underwear for incontinence….
I would add: “Run on someone else’s schedule”
That is pretty much me, then, if you use Brett’s definition.
I still have cable, but watch most things ‘on demand’.
The corporate press is dying because the corporate press has shown itself to be no more trustworthy than your average YouTuber. Only the reflexively conservative continue to uphold the value of status quo opinion- even when it’s proved to be a lie.
Also, what did you say that got you kicked off Twitter?
Houston cops’ double murder of 2 innocent people and their dog. Some people are starting to figure it out.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/they-did-not-deal-drugs-neighbors-of-slain-couple-who-shot-4-cops-refute-official-story/
How strange that all of the possible witnesses to the fuck up ended up dead. Maybe she did try to grab a gun (which under the circumstances, is probably justified). Or seeing the fuck up, they just straight up executed her so there’s no opposition to their story.
Does it matter? They broke into a house in plain clothes / no body cams and started shooting – starting with the dog. Who the hell would surrender to people under those circumstances?
I don’t believe that the guy shot 4 cops with a revolver. He shot one and the rest went nuts shooting the couple and each other.
Our brave boys in blue
By justified, I mean her actions (purported grabbing of armed shooting strangers in her own home).
Unless he was Jerry Miculek, I don’t think a man with a .357 revolver who was taken by surprised could shoot 4 men armed rifles, no.
Probably brought facts to an emotion fight.
“The corporate press is dying because the corporate press has shown itself to be no more trustworthy than your average YouTuber”
I call bullshit. The average YouTuber is not a lying partisan hack mouthpiece of the dnc hell bent on hiding stories that hurt democrats and constantly lying about the enemies of the democrats. Don’t insult them plz.
As my kids are constantly watching YouTube, sometimes on the living room TV, I have seen a few of those YouTubers. They ones they watch, anyway, are very niche and very savvy about keeping and retaining their fans. They have to put out a consistently good product and develop some level of trust with their fans if they want to keep those millions of views and continue to bring in cash.
The news media, however, still acts like it has a monopoly and we owe them trust due to their sheer existence.
The corporate press is dying because
I don’t think this is correct: we can’t put the red X on either end of the trust axis because many untrustworthy sources are thriving. The potent variable seems to be medium: few people want their partisan updates via paper, but they do want it on AM, cable, and internet. Rush, MSNBC, FoxNews, and SlateDotCom are going concerns despite what I submit is largely bankrupt content; if anything, the outlets that coddle extreme views with unending populist belligerence are the hottest thing going. Accepting the left/right axis, it follows that one end is wrong and therefore at least half of the outlets that are doing well are untrustworthy yet profitable. Conversely, all printed press is in a tailspin regardless of alignment or content.
The data are not consistent with the theory. The data are consistent with a failing of print in general.
The alternatives that you list are partisan in nature. Those will still thrive, because they are upfront about their biases. The old “just calling balls and strikes” fallacy that use to prop-up the corporate press outlets has been so thoroughly disproved that people no longer care what those outlets have to say. I think this explains why people watch MSNBC more than CNN. MSNBC doesn’t pretend like they’re calling “balls and strikes”. They are ideological by design.
That makes sense.
But then where are the partisan American papers? Why is there an MSNBC but no thriving Detroit Guardian?
That’s true. The main problem for print publications is that they continue to cling to the “non-partisan” label even when everyone knows that’s not true. The US hasn’t had newspapers that are closely aligned with a political position since Colonel McCormick ran the Chicago Tribune until the end of World War II (that also ushered in the end of the Old Right). Europe has had political newspapers for a long time and I wonder what the drop-off is in subscriptions between the US and UK, for example.
But, ideologically aligned print publications (New Republic, National Review, Jacobin, etc.), I believe, are still performing better than hard news publications.
Some around the fringes I think. Washington Times association with the Moonies being one.
The problem with the legacy media is that they’d come to assume they were owed an audience. I remember a decade ago, reading about a programming exec at an industry conference getting terribly upset that young men 18-24 (supposedly, the most valuable demographic) were spending more time playing video games than watching her network. At the time, ABC’s blockbuster Tuesday night lineup consisted of The Bachelor, Dancing With the Stars, and Grey’s Anatomy. I could tell then that their execs just didn’t get it. And from what I can tell, it’s only gotten worse.
Personally, I think that, within a decade, we’ll see some sort of scheme for government-controlled programming coming from the legacy media themselves.
He played video games, watched Youtube videos and some Netflix, and used social media platforms.
That’s like signs one, two, seven, and five that your (step)son might be an alt-right Nazi, according to traditional media. Have you frisked him for a MAGA cap? Have you asked whether he prowls the twilit streets of Chicago hunting for C-list cable actors?
I stopped watching TV years ago. Then stopped paying for it a few years after that when I realized I never used it.
I never adopted the big social media platforms. (Still can’t see why people go there).
Maybe it’s just misanthropy.
Never paid for TV, it never seemed worth it when I could pick up a streaming service for a fraction of the cost. With the new sticks, it’s even easy to toss those streams up on to a real TV as well.
I still watch DirecTV for sports and history/science stuff. And we still DVR about 4 shows on network TV. But that’s my wife and I. My kids are just as happy watching YouTube on a small screen.
We are definitely living through a serious change. I don’t remember the numbers (can someone help?) but I have heard the number of viewers for a prime time show on network TV in the 60’s-80’s was several times larger than today.
Well, you only had three options then, so it makes sense that they drew much larger numbers than today.
I have a LCD TV – which is only used for DVDs/Blu Ray that I get from the library.
News – here and Drudge
Other: Youtube
DVDs/Blu Ray that I get from the library.
So you like your content to have gaps in the story line.
Well I don’t like it – but yes, that’s the end result.
Let me see… Season 1 of Ripper Street. But no Season 2. But they have Seasons 3-5. Argggh!
I watch a ton of Discovery, Science, History, and other educational programming. Occasionally I will watch premium channels or Amazon Prime content now that I can just talk to my remote and get it on my TV. When the mood strikes me I watch some news or sports. I watch NFL Red Zone and never bother with games. I pay a bunch because my kid watches all sorts of stupid shit.
I watch movies and sports, and live somewhere where I can’t do the streaming thing.
I’ve got about 50 unwatched movies on the DVR. 😐
Outside of that, I watch Youtube videos
What great content is on Youtube though? I like the idea that we’re not limited to what networks think we should be watching, but I have seen what my wife and kids watch. It is garbage (to me) and I would rather watch Young Sheldon and Big Bang Theory on repeat*.
*I do not watch these shows, although I thought BBT was entertaining the first 1-3 seasons.
It really depends on the personality. Over the weekend I literally watched something like six hours of a lawyer going through various legal filings in civil suits. I suppose it helped that he got progressively drunker the more each particular video ran on.
I enjoy a few gaming channels for the banter. And It’s great for discovering some niche subject, like the couple weeks I spent watching backyard smelting videos.
Even watching things get melted down and recast depends upon the personality. I think I got annoyed at the belgian melting aluminum, watched some guy melt copper for ingots, then wandered off to a different subject.
AHEM.
I have a rule against following YouTube links from Glibs…
*violates rule*
*doesn’t play any videos*
*Moves off to watch Mechwarrior trailer again*
Yes, I uh, have seen every one. *eyes dart around room*
Quite a bit actually. I mean it does somewhat depend on what you consider good but there is so much content that if you spend a few minutes looking you will find something that will capture your attention
although I thought BBT was entertaining the first 1-3 seasons.
Yep. Season 3 was a precipitous decline from season 2. My wife is watching it through to the end, but the spark is gone. It’s a generic sitcom with light nerd theming.
That show is black face for nerds, you racist!
I think there was a glibs article poll thing about YouTube. plenty of good stuff
What great content is on Youtube though?
Ozzy Man
Bloke on the Range
Forgotten Weapons
Infinite Elgintensity
Hikock45
YT has so much good stuff you have to be careful not to not find yourself awake at 4AM watching travel vlogs, woodworking, homesteaders, DIYers, and on and on and wondering where the last 6 hours went.
Course there is also a lot of clickbait crap too but its usually pretty easy to spot.
Oh, I use youtube all the time for watching a video on how to do something (if I am actually going to do something). It’s the idea that i have some free time and I am going to sit down and watch some youtube for entertainment that still has me lost.
I suppose it kinda matters on what you mean by entertainment. Personally I’ve never been much for prime-time dramas or sitcoms, opting more for History/Discovery/NatGeo.
What I watch on youtube for entertainment frequently aligns with the things I do for fun.
Its by no means all I watch on YT, but one example:
Wife and I like to take the kids camping and hiking. So I subscribe to a fellow who calls himself “Slim Potatohead” who vlogs about his trips in the same sort of small camper we have, as well as the various alterations he does to it.
Good place to go to get ideas on where we might like to go camping/hiking, and things we can do to our a-frame to make it work better for us.
Its by no means a popular channel, and he generally publishes only about once a week or so, but he’s amusing enough.
Way to light the HM signal!
L
E
A
R
King Lear is under-appreciated as far as Shakespeare goes.
R
Y
Denis or Timothy?
Catherine O’
How can those geeks from 4chan get this right, but we can’t?
We need to learn to code?
We’re not secret Russian bots?
I don’t believe that, Sergei
Can it be independently verified that we are toeing the prog lion? No, it can’t. So obviously, we are Russian bots.
It’s not a secret.
We haven’t had cable in over 2 years. Didn’t really watch cable before that, besides sports. We have an antenna and a DVR for the antenna, mainly used to record old movies, America’s Funniest Home Videos, This Old House, and America’s Test Kitchen. Oh, and my wife watches the Bachelor and Young Sheldon.
80% of our viewing is YouTube or Netflix. Even then, our overall viewing is down as we try to get outside and do something productive with our lives rather than waste away in front of the boob tube.
I should have added above that where I am is on the edge of the broadcast market for Albany and not in the line of sight for the NYC transmitters, so when the weather isn’t so good broadcast TV can be a problem, too.
Heh. Mommy, where do drugs come from? I don’t know honey, let’s ask a way cool wise Latina.
CIA honkies invented them and airdropped them into minority neighborhoods. Duh.
Last year during a family event at my step-daughter’s college – sounds like this thing i saw on the internet
Had some shizz ass 1970s disco music going on in the background, right? WAKKA-WAKKA-WAKKA!
Old media is in deep shit and their executives are clueless. Here’s a great article about it:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-wants-to-be-big-in-entertainment-first-it-has-a-49-billion-problem-to-fix-11548777413
There’s C-Suite Exec thinking at it’s finest. We’ll stem the hemorrhage of customers by pissing the ones who remain. There was also a passage how the call-center workers were instructed to make it as difficult as possible to cancel, including promising discounts that were never applied, but that passage has now been removed with a correction.
I experienced this myself with Comcast but saved the email where the discount had been promised so they eventually caved. I’m sure the original person was fired for foolishly putting the promised discount in writing.
“The company has told investors it plans to make up for much of the money lost to defections by charging more to customers with discounts who stay.”
Surely they will pay at least $400 for NFL ticket next year, right?
There are still people leasing their phone sets 35 years after Divestiture.
Oh, you want to receive the HD signal? That’s 10 bucks. You want a DVR? That’s 10 bucks. You want the DVR to have a guide so you can program it? That’s 10 bucks. Oh, and by the way, we’re charging you 8 bucks for a “sports franchise fee” whether you watch that sport or not.
That’s $38 per month in bullshit, and they don’t understand why people are dropping their subscriptions.
Yes.
All those after the line fees are crazy. But I expect at least another decade before they give up on them. It is possible they might just reach a price insensitive part of their subscriber base and ride that into the ground. But if they keep it up they will have no new customers.
I’d imagine it’s going to start looking like land line versus cellular. We’re old and all the family knows our land line. But who gets new landline service anymore unless it’s essentially a way to get a discount triple play?
We theoretically have a land line because Dad worked for New York Tel for 30 years (I think it was already NYNEX by the time he retired), and part of the pension package was a free land line for life if he lived in the service are.
But we’re at the end of the line, so every time the line goes out, it takes forever before it gets fixed.
Will we reach an anarchist state? Will the US fraction into a million separate countries, will the power become decentralized again back to the states and individual counties, cities?
Same thing that has happened all throughout history when dozens of small fractured cultures existed in the same place. The most powerful one will conquer the rest and subjugate them to its will.
+1 barbarian hordes at the gates
President Ocasio-Cortez FTW
watch Netflix on their respective laptops. – use the tv as a monitor. watching on laptops is insufficient screen
“I have no idea what the future will bring”
I do. It doesn’t matter how you watch them. Just take the two greatest movies of all time. Which, oddly, were both sequels. Then combine them:
Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware. Game over, man. Game over!
Wait, no mention of a rubber shark?
Happy?
Young Guns II and Empire Strikes Back?
Traditional corporate media is dying. At first, it felt gradual, now it feels sudden. Not just newspapers, but television, movies, even corporate digital media is crumbling before our eyes. – honestly while I do see some vague appeal to the patience and discipline of watching a tv show at a certain hour of a certain day, yeah that shit aint for me. When people started having gizmos to record shows in their absence is the time the classic model started to become dated. Now with internet it is pointless
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1092471501071228928
Dave Waddle is, in fact, less self-aware they you thought. Fat boy has thoughts
“Would I look less like a fat French sailor if I grew a beard to connect with my mustache?”
– Dave Waddle thoughts
I like the calls: “cc: Brett Kavenaugh”
I love the fact they are rubbing this moron’s nose in the whole Kavanaugh thing.
Anyone who likes King Crimson can’t be all bad.
Jordan Peterson quoting “21st Century Schizoid Man” at length in one of his lectures is a little disconcerting.
Special appearance from “boofing truther” WokeHat. WokeHat is slightly less self-aware than Dave Waddle. Amazing
“Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!”
Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders call for restricting corporate share buybacks
These morons won’t be happy until they destroy the economy.
Gilmored the link.
Derp
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/04/senate-democrats-call-for-restricting-corporate-share-buy-backs.html
“And then we’ll have the barbarian state of Flyover, which is all them redneck states. The Progtopias first endeavor will be to build walls, to keep people in.”
Should we setup a password so I know how to identify glibs at my door seeking refuge in Flyover? I can’t afford to feed you but I can at least give you a warm place to sleep while you seek a more permanent residence.
Glib Spies:
Spy 1: You know who else?
Spy 2: Lou Reed.
Spy 1: AND BY LOU REED MEAN…
Spy 2: Narrowed Gaze.
Followed by a doff of the monocle.
They don’t want to actually destroy it, they just want to redistribute it, to themselves. It’s totally going to work this time.
Some en just want to see the stock market burn
*men
I don’t want to restrict it, but changing the tax code to encourage dividends over capital gains would be a good thing.
It is really hard to fake dividends.
My wife watches a lot of Fox news but after her morning fix she switches to cooking and shopping. I watch a few minutes of Fox 5 o’clock news but usually fall asleep for a few minutes.
I am so enlightened and entertained from reading the articles/quips here that I don’t need much more entertainment. Talking to my older friends most watch TV very selectively, sports or news, etc. Few watch network stuff, many of the octogenarians/classmates are a little computer savvy and use Gmail/yahoo to deal with their friends on a daily basis.
Politically I think few of the locals care much about what even happens at county/state level other than the taxes. Plainly not woke.
don’t care, insert anywhere
phrasing?
STEVE LIKE THE CUT OF YOUR JIB.
RAPE YOU LAST.
Will we reach an anarchist state? – you optimist
Will the US fraction into a million separate countries, – i find this terribly unlikely
will the power become decentralized again back to the states and individual counties, cities – lol no
Centralized media has allowed for the centralization of power – there were other forces at hand
doesn’t it feel like a mass disillusionment is taking place – I honestly don’t think so. The demographics will change and the democrats will get that permanent majority they are dreaming of, or so they think. The disillusion of an election passes and is replaced with rage
More like 50 or so separate countries. Some of them, like New York, will further disintegrate.
And then Manhattan under emperor Bloomberg will invade Queens and enslave the wymminz.
There will be like 4 countries after the great implode of 2024. We will have Progtopia West, comprised of Cali, Oregon, and Washington. We’ll have Progtopia East comprised of all the NE states combined with NY, NJ, and the Mid-Atlantic states along with VA. We’ll have the great Caliphate of Minnesoda, joined by Wisconsin and Michigan. And then we’ll have the barbarian state of Flyover, which is all them redneck states. The Progtopias first endeavor will be to build walls, to keep people in.
Coastal Pacwest will go Progtopia. Once you hit the mountains, it’s all Flyover Degenerates. PA and NY come apart and the upstate / western halves join team flyover.
It should be the next Total War game.
Illinois haz a sad.
“Illinois haz a sad.”
Needz moar Somali refugees.
LOL, I see what you meant now. I assumed it was based on proggie-ness. Don’t include Sconnie and MI in with the new Somali homeland if that’s the metric.
https://cis.org/Rush/Somali-Refugees-US
A couple years old, but the numbers in the bottom graph show neither state is even in the top ten for refugees.
Wisconsin will be The Great Hmong Empire, you racist shitlord.
My recent experience isn’t so much the people in charge of old media don’t see that a change is needed, it’s that the sales staff isn’t good enough to figure out how to sell it. This is my experience in a very very very small market, but I can see that as a problem in bigger markets. That and an attachment to doing things ‘the way they have always been’.
I have not watched cable TV in 7 years. I have internet and recently I got netflix and HBO go. Until recently I did the Romanian thing and torrented stuff.
“Governor Partial Birth of a Nation” (I stole that)
Is it inappropes to call it a media lynching?
But is it high tech?
I think a fair amount of mainstream media content is still being consumed but almost nobody watches it in TV format anymore. The central problem with TV is that it was developed to work in the way that suited advertisers most as advertisers were the actual customers so the products will always be developed in a way that is friendliest to the advertisers and not the users. Normally this isn’t a problem as there are rarely alternatives that can fill the same desire of the public. Now however technology is changing that, it is becoming ever easier to find and consume the media that you want to find in the way you want to consume it. So people may still watch any given network program because they like it but they probably will not be planning on having their butts on the couch every Thursday night to catch the latest episode. They’ll go 3 or 4 weeks then binge to catch up. The sole exception is live sports because of the immediacy of the event
Yeppers. Or skip the catch up part because we’re over come with events. Our entertainment time is limited.
What great content is on Youtube though?
There’s a lot of weird random stuff available, and I don’t even watch youtube that much.
Motor racing. Sometimes live, like Bathurst 12 hour thyis weekend. Lots of clips and historical stuff.
Zatoichi the Blind Swordsman- I must have watched fifty old episodes/movies.
Just recently, I watched a three part informational series from MIT about operating a lathe. I learned a couple of things.
As far as news or current events? I stay the fuck away from youtube.
I f I think about it, I’ll turn on Meet the Press on Sunday morning. Other than that, all I watch on “real” teevee is sports.
On YT I watch Doug Demuro review funky/exotic cars, Honest Trailers, war documentaries, car crash/road rage videos – some are specifically North American while the majority are Russian, and Fail Army videos.
And YT is also a great way to find new music to listen to, or live shows of bands I already enjoy. Or old music videos that I would have never seen pre-internet.
Why would you waste your time with Meet the Press, there are literally dozens of news and information outlets on Youtube which are better.
Beyond many channels with good content there are tons of clips of old movies or tv shows or even full episodes and movies.
I have been banned from posting on Twitter.
Me too!
*high five*
What the hell did you do to get banned? Are bannings that common on Twitter?
I’ve never tweetered. But I can make a guess that if I did, it wouldn’t be long before I get banned. Have you ever read Twitter? I have no idea how anyone could resist offending the idiots on there.
I’ve read it. It’s garbage all the way through. I always thought it would be funny to make a parody account, though.
I had an account once. Stopped using it after a week. I enjoy the occasional taste of derp. Bathing in it is about as appealing as bathing in molassas.
Questioning the narrative of idiots repeatedly. I received multiple warnings for over a year, but the tweet that caused the banning involved me telling a pussy hat type that she was going to die alone.
So, you got banned for saying what everyone else was thinking?
Never tell the truth to leftists on Twitter, fastest way to get banned.
Although I will note, that Sargon of Akkad earned his banning by sending black gay porn to white supremacists who were trolling him.
If you have 12 cats you’re not alone!
You’re a lucky guy. One less distraction in your life…
I hardly ever used it anyway. It was more to follow interesting people.
*high five*
I’m reaching a point where I’m questing the integrity of people who have not been banned from a social media site.
What about us smarties that never set up an account on the Internet’s equivalent of a bathroom stall in a dingy dive bar?
You insult bathroom stalls in dingy dive bars.
Wait, no one ever mentioned Twitter had a glory hole…
I’ve never been banned from Facebook or Twitter.
Of course, I never joined them to begin with. If you’re going to be anti-social, be anti-social. *Glares at other posters like a dick*
I worry about getting banned here. I first start post at Reason as Troy in the early aughts. I do not share many of the libertarian positions I had then. I.e. open borders, immigration, abortion… And I am, for lack of better terms, becoming personally soicially conservative, yet I still want a small govt. I think homosexuality is sodomy but I don’t think the cure is governmennt. And I don’t adviocaye beating up fags cuz still have NAP. Still Very libertarianish
But sometimes you guys says things that piss me the fuck off cuz they show utter cluelessness. Like some of the mocking of poor people. As if there is any fucking God damn fucking shred of anything called a meritocracy or rule of law
I want to be with my own tribe. It doesn’t mean I want to exterminate the other tribes.
And I can tell you guys have moved too. But I don’t know how far
So this is your guys’s sand box and I don’t want to be Johned.
I had this conversation not long ago: “When was the last time you said, ‘Hey, I gotta get home. [Program X] is coming on.’?”
Unless it was a foozball game, never.
3rd grade, the Simpsons. (circa 93).
That I can recall, it would have been the late 90’s with Babylon 5
By the late 90s I had my own VCR, so I was time shifting just like I do now with DVR.
I’m so old I remember running inside, to listen to a radio “show”. I think I was about 5, we finally got a TV when I was 6, against my Mother’s wishes.
My son just turned 25. They have Netflix and a couple other subscriptions. I don’t think they view YouTube other than to figure out how to replace a faucet. They don’t have a local antenna, but they do log onto local channels to stream network TV on the rare occasion they watch it (Big Bang Theory). The final piece of the pie is watch parties when something is available only on a service: ten kids come over including one who has a subscription to Xfinity or whatever: today the guy with the service goes over to the guy with the coolest house. I think they get pretty much all the college football they want off local services.
Conversely, NewWife and I have a fat, traditional cable service and subscriptions on top of it. Our time is valuable but we find the content options are reasonably priced compared to the effort of constantly chasing technology. Before I escaped Texas I subscribed to MLB because I was outside the STL market; MLB has forbid local radio from streaming games, so I couldn’t listen to the Cardinals on KMOX: I had to break down and buy the service . . . which was my first experience with streaming on my phone as well; my current Xfinity service includes FoxMidwest, so I get every Cardinals game in the package.
I watch a lot of baseball and college football but bet I could almost end my cable and rely on network streams including the occasional subscription (ESPN?); in theory that might could save me $2,000 a year if I wanted the charm of finding/chasing/recording/watching content.
Similar to you we have a fairly fat cable plan, but no premium movie channels. Our time is worth the price. I have one of the last Windows Media Center plus cablecard setups. So I pay $4.00 total equipment costs and have DVR and 3 TVs that can view live and recorded content.
My son college bound son watches zero TV.
I would say fully half if not more of my content is watched “over the top” i.e. streaming. And 85% of my streaming is Japanese language. No other place to get the kind of variety for a lot people. I’d imagine non-English programming is going to be a growth market as narrow casting becomes more and more prevalent.
What do you use for streaming Japanese? I’ve found the availability on the bigger streaming services to be woeful. Chinese content, Korean, etc, no problem.
Crunchyroll for anime. Combination of niconico and YouTube for everything else. Also, Netflix does a fair amount of Japanese programming and makes it available on the US service.
I watch lots of TV talk and news shows if I have a vague idea about the topic.
I find it interesting just how small the world is when I wind up watching Japanese content with Chinese (usually traditional) and Korean subs on the video.
I’ve watched some on Netflix but they seem to be limited to the stuff they produce/co-produce. I miss the drama series and the prices for DVDs in Jpn (or through iTunes) is ridiculously high. I can find episodes here and there on YouTube but rarely an entire run. Only made it half way through Nozaki Shuhei Auditor of Bank during my last trip.
My small world moment was listening to Cpop and Jpop on a KLM flight from Calgary.
And tx for the niconico. I’ll have to check it out.
Ditto. I watch a lot of sports and a number of cooking/reality/learning shows, and that’s about it. I have no interest in anything on Youtube. So I want to cut the cable cord but the challenge now is finding/awaiting an alternate broadband operator that won’t rape me like the only currently acceptable option on my street.
That’s $20,000 over 10 years….
Speaking of Twitter: New Remy
Nice
I watch Doug Demuro review funky/exotic cars,
I watched a couple of those. I can’t stand that guy. *shrugs*
I have watched that guy in California who does the “one take” things or whatever they’re called, where somebody brings him a car and he drives it around and does an on the fly review. Somebody bought him a 914 (a grannymobile with something like 7500 miles on it), and it took him about eight attempts to get the thing underway. After he stalled it a couple of times, I started to pay attention; “You’re in third, dummy.” *stall* “Still third gear.” *stall* “Third, again.” et c.
The shifters in those things are rather “imprecise”, but come on.
DD is annoying but in a friendly way – like the nervous kid asking the too hot girl out to the dance.
Well put. And sometimes because nobody has the courage to ask her dance she’s happy to dance with the nervous kid!
YouTube is worth it just for Sarah-n-Tuned.
I am an old dude. I still watch “TV” in that I have DirecTV and subscriptions to the premium packages (HBO, Showtime, et al). I do not do Netflix. I have an Amazon Prime account, but I do not watch content through Amazon.
I don’t understand “watching” anything on a small device, because I have a high-def 50 inch monitor and a surround sound system.
Excuse, me I need a nap after my lunch.
you can put those streaming shows on your T…never mind, take a nap, I don’t want to be constantly doing old person tech calls.
One of the “features” of living in a semi-rural development is that Internet performance (even DSL) is shit.
So pointing a dish a the sky is still a better technical solution than streaming over the Internet.
I get that part. That’s why I haven’t gone streaming.
My wife runs the TV in real time on “lady channels” like WeTV while she is doing other things.
I generally record content at off hours to play back on any TV in the house when I am ready to watch something.
I’d be just a happy downloading content “off hours” over DSL as over the dish. I just haven’t invested any effort in figuring out how to do it.
We watched ‘Back to the Future 2’ with the kids Saturday night in a retro movie night theme. We remembered it was about the future in 2015 and neither the wife nor I had seen it in years. We thought it was interesting to see what the creators hit and missed on future-wise.
Clothes and food were off base, along with not being able to predict social media, since they still showed USA Today as the main news source, complete with robot cameras (reporters?). They had flying cars of course (where’s mine?!) TV was max headroom-like and Michael Jackson was still alive…
They actually got pretty close to smart homes and large screen tvs with personal content. They were way off on how the police treat a random person laying unconscious in an alley.
Also, Michael J. Fox’s hands were way too steady in the future. Another fail by the story writers.
Lol. I should not have laughed as hard as I did at this comment.
They were also off by one year on the Cubs winning the World Series.
Haven’t “had” cable since my apt in college (’00+) where I figured out that it had never been turned off from the last tenants. Army time, post-Army etc – never subscribed to anything. Currently on netflix, crunchyroll, amazon prime, youtube and my still growing collection of DVDs/Blu-Rays.
I do watch cartoons at the gym while I’m on the elliptical or treadmill – or the occasional movie depending on time overlaps. I’ll flip through stuff if I’m at a relative’s house, but no purpose other than that.
Repost mistakenly replied to an earlier comment.
“And then we’ll have the barbarian state of Flyover, which is all them redneck states. The Progtopias first endeavor will be to build walls, to keep people in.”
Should we setup a password so I know how to identify glibs at my door seeking refuge in Flyover? I can’t afford to feed you but I can at least give you a warm place to sleep while you seek a more permanent residence.
I have an Amazon Prime account, but I do not watch content through Amazon.
Amazon is the only paid content provider I have. It works for me.,
If you are looking to fact check our piss poor press with regards to foreign policy, you can watch news from all over the world with wwitv.com. I watch it a lot and it’s amazing to see what stories our press doesn’t cover and how our press frames events differently than from other parts of the world.
What I watched last week using a television and some kind of antenna/streaming wire:
Five hockey games
One football game
Six minutes of an NBA game (Bulls)
Half a college basketball game (Loyola)
Reruns of The Good Wife to fall asleep
Some kind of nature show either on PBS or streamed (can’t remember)
Two hours of Freakonomics streamed via something
Monty Python on Netflix
Ripping Yarns on YouTube
You spent too much time watching that Bulls game
I was waiting for the Blackhawks game to start.
That’s garbage too. Time to embrace the MLS in the spring.
Damn right. Welcome to the club. Prepare to be mocked.
And a partridge in a pear tree.
If a service provides value, people will use it.
Corporate media is like Blockbuster; they felt they had an indispensable place so they rested on their laurels. They also became absurdly sensationalized, biased and dumbed down to the LCD. The general populace is smarter than NBCABCCBS et. al. assumes them to be. They no longer provide anything of value, so people stopped using it.
OT: Damn it, Fender. Turquoise? ‘Sonic’ Gray. I’d like to be less shallow, but I’m not. Get less stupid colors.
I sort of like that turquoise.
Spawn 2 has the Polar White with the maple neck. Purty!
Yeah, I got the Squier version of that. Looks like Clapton’s old guitar, except it won’t stay in tune. You pay $199 for a guitar, you get what you pay for.
Whatever, I’m a bassist, just got the guitar to dick around on. Glad your offspring has something cool, though. May he/she (sorry, dunno) learn to shred.
She’s getting pretty good. Her Jazz is a Mexi version and definitely stays in tune.
Cool. I remember at 14-15, I was playing 4-5 hours a day. I had no natural talent, but if you practice that much, you’ll get good anyway. A year and a half in, I was playing stuff like Iron Maiden’s Phantom of the Opera, classical melodies, Police (whatever anyone thinks of Sting, he was a great bassist back in the day).
And, yes, Mexi Fender Strats and Precisions are good instruments. And since you save about $1k, definitely worth it. Let your baby girl shred.
Speaking of TV. I don’t watch it, the wife does. But I do remember when TV was more exciting. Remember antennas? I remember my first real one, I mean one made of metal that you didn’t just stick on top your set and they called it ‘rabbit ears’. I conveniently placed that bad boy metal monstrosity on the top of the hill behind my house. Where I put it, to easily get to it, you had to climb up around a 15 foot sheer rock cliff. Otherwise you had to walk around several hundred yards to get up there.
One day we were trying to watch some foozball and the channel was a little fuzzy, or as we said back then, snowy. So there was only one solution, need to go up there and play with the antenna while on a walkie talkie back to home base. “Yeah, that’s better! No wait! Back a little, right there!”. Unfortunately, there was an ice storm going on at the time. So I get to the cliff and I’m like ‘Oh fuck, there’s ice all over those rocks, better go around’. But having already had my fair share of beer, I decided I’m scaling up anyway. I got stuck about half way up because the next rocks I had to grab onto where too slick. I fell off and banged up my knee pretty good. Anyway, back then, TV was exciting. And then there were all the incidents when some of the hillbilly neighbors had mounted their own metal antenna on top the roof, conveniently located right next to an electric line. So they got turned into bacon.
Then there was the ‘big dish’, the 10 ft monstrosity in your yard with which you could pick up anything, pr0n included, for free. That was the peak of TV, it’s been all downhill since then.
They made rotors to rotate TV antennas. We had one.
What the hell happened to Popular Mechanics?
5 Simple Tricks for Staying Warm When It’s Deadly Cold
I think this is why corporate media is dying.
burn the dog for heat
They went light on the mechanics, and now they’re light on the popular, too
Holy crap. I looked at the guy’s article list.
I can only imagine the kind of person who reads those articles in earnest.
The problem with the legacy media is that they’d come to assume they were owed an audience. I remember a decade ago, reading about a programming exec at an industry conference getting terribly upset that young men 18-24 (supposedly, the most valuable demographic) were spending more time playing video games than watching her network. At the time, ABC’s blockbuster Tuesday night lineup consisted of The Bachelor, Dancing With the Stars, and Grey’s Anatomy. I could tell then that their execs just didn’t get it. And from what I can tell, it’s only gotten worse.
Personally, I think that, within a decade, we’ll see some sort of scheme for government-controlled programming coming from the legacy media themselves.
(please delete my misthreaded earlier posting of this.)
Heh.
The amount of misthreading around here is getting out of hand and I demand you all cut it out.
What do you expect with someone from ALBUQUERQUE?
Simply brilliant.
https://www.thisisinsider.com/british-store-sells-650-thought-box-which-you-put-on-your-head-2019-2?utm_content=bufferea948&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-bi
What’s in the box, man?
I sense an opportunity. Who’s with me on a startup to sell them for $500 a pop?
People are saying that She Guevara has gone full-on anti-Semite by bragging about her phone call with Jeremy “I went to a memorial service for Palestinian terrorists who murdered Jewish athletes at the Olympics” Corbyn.
In her defense, though, she is profoundly stupid (by definition anyone who embraces socialism in the 21st Century suffers from some degree of mental retardation). And she doesn’t fit the profile of an anti-Semite. I’ve never encountered a bigot with a 36 C cup size. Sorry, but the bra size never lies.
Your are just threatened by Alex OC
I’ve never encountered a bigot with a 36 C cup size.
Eva Braun?
Hmmmm….would need to see pictures where she is not wearing those deceptive torpedo bras that they made back then.
Ow! You poked my eye out!
I hear Adolf practiced unrestricted submarine warfare iykwimaityd
Is that a motorboating joke?
36C is a borderline hate criminal. You really need to get up to a D to be sure.
“by definition anyone who embraces socialism in the 21st Century suffers from some degree of mental retardation”
So, the entire democrat party?
You got that wrong.
It’s Jeremy “I Love Hugo Chavez” Corbyn
Is your name Jackie Chiles by any chance?
DOOM
https://www.sciencealert.com/research-warns-of-a-pending-parkinson-s-pandemic-and-we-need-to-pay-attention
I recommend drinking more
and smoking…
We can avoid this pandemic only if a progressive Congress gets busy and makes a law. Of course, we’ll make sure grandpa and granny are comfortable before we bludgeon them to death. Let’s just call it the ‘Age Equality and Freedom ACT’.
Rhetorical question?
https://unherd.com/2019/02/why-are-illiberal-universities-unchallenged/
Without reading the article, I know why.
It’s because the illiberals will employ violence when they are finally challenged and the liberals keep hoping the problem will just go away.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha. By Nigel Biggar? Sometimes I wish I was a troll.
OT (just read this somewhere):
Recent photographic evidence that has come to light suggests that Governor Northam’s favorite film is apparently called Partial Birth of a Nation.
Yes. I recently have had copies of the local Sunday paper delivered- by accident. It used to be a regular thing- go to buy the papers, read the ads, classifieds, do a crossword. Sunday papers were packed ! Now, the local press does 3 days a week publishing, and all issues are super slim. The Sunday paper was the same size as what a daily used to be.
Once a year or so the local paper decides to give everyone a free Sunday paper to try to convince people to subscribe. Instead, since they toss them on the front walkway area (which isn’t used by people who live in the house, or guests, or anyone other then sales people and mailmen), they sit there in plastic bags until people walk around to pick them up and toss them.
I bought like 15 months of WaPo from a kid who lives 2 doors down to help him with his sportzball stuff. Or whatever. Anyway, huge fucking mistake. They wouldn’t stop sending these rags to my door, even after I called them 3 times and politely reminded them that I had purchased a one time 15 mo of issues and that it was already up, so stop sending them. They assured me I was right and that they would stop sending them. They didn’t. Then one night they made the mistake of calling me when I had been drinking and wanted me to ‘pay’ for my subscription. Of course, I had the receipt for what I had bought and once again assured them, I do not have a subscription. Then I got mean as hell and went on a tirade. “WaPo sucks so hard and they’re so broke, they have to try to scam people!” Poor guy on the phone. They never called me again and they stopped sending the damn paper.
I didn’t donate to Reason in the last couple telethons but I still get the damn thing in the mail every month. I doubt their operation is sophisticated enough to try to charge me down the line, thank God.
Heh, that reminds me. Last week on the couple of days it was really cold, I was going outside to get the mail and my wife goes looking for a hat for me, being a good mommy and all like she is. She hands me my Reason beanie. I had forgotten all about that thing. I was like ‘I’m not wearing that thing!’. She looked bewildered. I was like ‘They’re cucks!’ and she says ‘What’s a cuck?’, lol.
My 80 year old aunt still gets a paper. The local paper is wed-sat, printed down in madison now and shipped back up here so it’s always a day late with the news. The Green Bay paper stopped delivering here at all, not even to the store. They’ll mail you your papers, so you get like a whole weeks worth a week later. Huh, what can go wrong with those models…
A friend of mine who lives near where I grew up still gets the local paper delivered. He showed me how the Sunday paper has shrunk. He’s thinking about a betting pool on when the Sunday edition gets too light for the paperboy to throw it.
Democracy Dies in Delusion
Many accused the company of adopting a condescending tone, if not joining a war against masculinity itself. Gillette’s Twitter account received a deluge of negative comments that called the company a promoter of left-wing propaganda.
The conservative blowback against Gillette raises an interesting question: Why do the nation’s largest corporations so often come down on the liberal side on social issues, given that conservatives are typically the ones who support lower taxes, fewer regulations and other pro-business policies? During the New Deal, business executives offered one possible answer: Projecting a socially enlightened image reduces the demand for greater regulation. But another reason looms: Social conservatives do not exercise sufficient market power to compel brand loyalty at the highest levels.
————
Social conservatives have had much more success in shaping the business policies of regional corporations, based primarily in the South where they are most densely concentrated. (Think Chick-fil-A and Hobby Lobby, not Starbucks and Pepsi-Cola.)
And this reveals the reality: At the end of the day, corporate support for social policy is about what companies say will sell the most razors or coffee. That requires creating moral and social legitimacy in the eyes of a business’s different publics. And whether they be employees, consumers or some other group, those publics are more likely today to lean left on a range of social issues.
As they have in previous years, Sunday night’s Super Bowl advertisements will offer a buffet of punchlines and a long list of celebrities. But they will also show brands telling stories of inclusion, environmental sustainability, national unity and, ultimately, corporate claims of social responsibility. Not because these companies are going to change the world, but because they have many reasons to connect their bottom line with the march of human progress.
“Reality has a liberal bias.” Sure it does. Another idiot with his head so far up his own ass he’s almost completely out of sight. I can’t wait ’til these buffoons disappear completely.
We need more companies brave enough to tell their customers, “You suck.”
And how about their attitudes toward libertarians?
Wait, I got this – FUCK YOU, WINSTON.
gaaay
Wait, I got this..ahhh, nevermind.
“The New York Times loves us”
– Reason fundraising pitch from two years back, wherein they seem to think that being controlled opposition is somehow something to brag about
I hear the cocktail parties are a real humdinger…
It’s all of the quality hookers and drugs served on the downlow.
Libertarians buy most of their stuff bespoke.
I went with Harry’s razors. No Gillette shit even in my house any longer. Not even the shave gel, the Harry’s is pretty good, expensive, but good.
I though Harry’s were equally woke. Also, real men shave with a rock they find in the yard.
Well, according to that guy above that wrote the article, everyone is woke. Except Chik-fil-A and they’re just some mom and pop shop down in some hollers in the South. Although it is weird how here in MD, those places are packed with people 24/7.
For real. I’ve never seen a Chik-fil-a without a line, and most of the time the drive-through is at least a ten minute wait. Although having people come by with tablets to do the ordering and paying part is genius.
“Muh….you hate capitalism or something. Triggered much?”
– Super smart cosmo who feels the need to parrot the status quo opinion on everything
I pay for my razors with rubles, comrade.
You fucking Russians. Now you’re ruining our razors, too.
Rubles for stubble?
I stopped at their first usage of “social conservative” as the opposite of “woke”. FOAD.
Well the “woke” are the radicals so I guess opposing their views makes a “social conservative” these days.
This false dichotomy that (mostly) the left is pushing is not only wrong but dangerous (deliberately so, IMHO – they want to sow discord, the fuckers).
At least it’s not “neoliberal reactionaries” or some meaningless tripe.
At the end of the day, corporate support for social policy is about what companies say will sell the most razors or coffee.
Yeah, because Dick’s Sporting Goods’ revenues have just been amazing since they’ve aligned themselves with progressives.
Which gets to the author’s fundamental error. He assumes corporate infallibility in marketing decisions. But, Gillette, a company that has seen it’s market share dwindle from over 70% to less than 50% over a few years, should instruct us that marketers are all too fallible.
Part of what they are missing is that conservatives have been relatively light on the boycott wagon. So, they’ve been a safer group to alienate than progressives. But, that reluctance to boycott is hardly etched in stone.
Good point. I think people who identify as conservative tend to be more pragmatic when it comes to buying things. Frankly, most people who identify as liberal (as in leftists, not as in classical liberal) are the same way, I suspect. It’s the people who identify as progressive who tend to buy into the idea that buying a chicken sandwich is a full-throated public endorsement of the ideals of the business owner in every single possible context, and if those ideals happen to be “problematic”, then the only morally upright response is to boycott everything they’re involved with. Conservatives seem to be able to separate commerce from political statement, although there are notable exceptions from time to time such as Dick’s Sporting Goods.
I do wonder about companies that are jumping on the woke train. It could be a strategy to try to recoup lost revenue by appealing to a new market, or by rebranding. Maybe in that sense “Woke” is the new “family-friendly” or “American-made”. Maybe conservatives are conservative in all respects and tend to have high brand loyalty while progressives trend younger and tend to be more open to product switching, or maybe just need to be constantly reminded to buy your stuff as opposed to someone else’s.
“Good point. I think people who identify as conservative tend to be more pragmatic when it comes to buying things.”
Honestly, no bias here, people who identify as conservative tend to have jobs and money as compared to progs who seem to mostly live on unicorn dust, due to the fact that most of them are younger and do not have jobs or good jobs anyway. Sitting around waiting on magical free stuff as compared to planning and working hard can have a very harsh effect on your economic well being. It’s no surprise that you hear about these polls where a majority of millennials want socialism or think that ‘soaking the rich’ will somehow make them better off. They’re idiots.
“Reality has a liberal bias.”
…say the people who believe that women can have penises.
That would certainly explain why they regularly need to kill millions of people.
The spousal unit and I are watching less and less traditional media all the time. We’re also watching less and less online content, other than instructional stuff.
Turns out, there’s good books to read and a world of other stuff to see and do, and neither of us are getting any younger. The boob tube as well as the Intertoobz look pretty weak in comparison. I likely spend more time on Glibs and Instagram than everywhere else combined
**SOB!** ”AH CAN’T QUIT YOU!”
Find yourself someone who loves you as much as Democrats love black face. Governor Infanticide still enjoys 50% support among VA Democrats. I think his support of infanticide actually endeared him with many Democratic voters.
https://twitter.com/eyokley/status/1092507265096130560
It’s Not infanticide, because the fetuses may be non-viable, or malformed. or something. So its not really murder.
Racist and pro-abortion. The guy is trying to be the most hated politician in the country.
If we’re being honest, being racist and pro-infanticide also makes him the most progressive politician in the country if we want to revisit the beliefs of the early 20th Century progressives
It is interesting how the progressives of old were very pro-technology and white supremacist. The White Man with his superior culture, genes and technology had finally produced the Real TOP MEN who should rule the world. The belief in the Real TOP MEN is still there but now White Men are the worst and his technology is ruining the world.
“pre-controversy”
which controversy?
Pre-pickup truck ad he ran against Gillespie?
i had to go and find that one. the sneering redneck running down immigrant children. classy.
It’s wonderful irony. Hey, I’m sure the guy isn’t all that racist. At least, he probably doesn’t act on it if he has any. But he’s the guy throwing stones, so.
https://www.amgreatness.com/2019/01/31/aoc-shows-why-a-libertarian-progressive-alliance-will-fail/
Not sure what a hybrid one-world socialistic stare run by multinationals would look like…
*socialistic state* Fucking autocorrect.
“For these reasons, it is impossible to be a “progressive libertarian.”
I wasn’t aware there is anyone in the universe who believed in such a thing, outside of Reason and a few oddball websites, probably ran by Weigel and shreek.
the ultimate outcome of a libertarian political victory would be a world run by multinational corporations.
That much isn’t even clear to me. One of the drivers of industrial consolidation is government intervention. Free markets tend to put the behemoths at a disadvantage.
. These include legalizing drug use – Yes, criminal justice reform – Yes, gay marriage – erm, kinda sorta. Most libertarians are for removing marriage from the state, and protecting a woman’s “right to choose.” – fairly contentious issue in libertarian circlesThey also largely embrace libertarian positions on issues such as open borders – another contentious issue in libertarian circles, cyber currency, innovation, disruptive technology – libertarianism has a position on these things? , and maybe even on school choice – lol no, police accountability – BLM is worse for police accountability than L&O conservatism, and military spendingcitation needed. There’s a lot of overlap.
I think the problem is that the author doesn’t know what libertarianism entails.
Hearing most people define libertarianism is sort of like hearing someone who has never experienced water, describing what it’s like to be wet.
Speaking of The Birth of A Nation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_a_Nation_(2016_film)#Rape_allegations_against_Parker
Um yeah…
Ok, my interest and my work is media. I’ve been pondering a new feature where I talk about forgotten TV shows. Not just about the shows themselves, which will be fun, but also about some of the technical and industry innovations made by shows that aren’t widely lauded as classics. Does this sound interesting to anyone else?
Yes it does. What sort of eras are you talking about? Like the Hank McCune Show or Amos ‘n’ Andy? Or more recent?
I plan on starting with some stuff from my childhood, so I’ll start in the 80s and 90s, but I have few ideas fro some shows from the 50s and 60s as well.
The Television Ghost has a sad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Television_Ghost
Yes. Yes, please. Yes to more television talk. The taboo of minstrelsy seems at odds, in my mind anyway, with the fact that The Amos & Andy Show was the most popular media franchise in America for 40+ years and created pretty much every single TV comedy trope and plotline in use today. Also, Hee Haw pioneered non-linear taping when they taped all of their recurring segments for a season together.
I think I’ve said this before. But I FUCKING HATE PHOTOSHOP I FUCKING HATE PHOTOSHOP. DIE IN A FIRE, YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT. DIE DIE DIE. IT’S TAKING ALL MY STRENGTH NOT TO TOSS THIS COMPUTER. AAAAUGH. AUUGH!
Have you considered switching to decaf?
I thought you were going to switch to GIMP.
You’re right, Rhywun. The main thing pissing me off is I used to have no problem with Photoshop. None. GIMP is a totally new program to me, though I’ve set it up on this computer already.
I need to go calm down, which I’m sure is apparent to everyone. Also, I need to go break stuff.
have you tried paint.net? You were talking about gimp, which I haven’t used, but paint.net can do a few handy things.
MS Paint?
https://www.silicon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Microsoft-Paint-684×513.jpg
God, I miss Paint Shop Pro circa 2002. That thing did everything I as a naive user wanted.
I swear, lack of good options on Windows will make me pull out my 12 year old Macbook Pro just so I can run Acorn again. Why is scale/bacground adjust/couple layers/export to png/half-dozen brushes impossible to make without adding 150 other features?
I used to use Macromedia products a lot, for graphics and for web site building. Their stuff worked great and was easy to use. Then Adobe bought Macromedia, and fucked it all up. The End.
Wow. It has warmed up to -4. Woohoo.
The Late P Brooks stood shirtless on the side of his snowy mountain. He beat his chest, and howled at the threaders above.
I haven’t had cable TV since living in my last apartment (it was “free”, i.e., part of the rent), partly due to stinginess and partly due to not wanting to be tempted to waste the time. Haven’t kept up on a lot of the latest tech, except my wife and I have a Netflix subscription and stream a lot of stuff there, plus YouTube videos on our computer. We do watch some over-the-air TV (local news and sports, mostly) and the new digital technology has allowed stations to have three or four channels (x.1, x.2, etc); a lot of the extra channels have old movies or specialized fare (sci-fi, westerns, action, etc.) which we watch sometimes. We finally had to replace the TV in our bedroom and got one with Roku, which we use mostly to watch YouTube or Netflix on the TV rather than our computers.
The age of centralized media, centralized narratives, centralized culture, and hence centralized power is done.
Lol. It fucking baffles me how you could possibly be Pollyannaish enough to actually believe this. The media is more centralized now than it was 10 years ago, and will be considerably more centralized 10 years hence. Don’t mistake the decentralized delivery method for decentralized content. They are not the same. 50 years ago there were thousands and thousands of newspapers in this country – decentralization! … all running the same content syndicated from a dozen sources and mostly all owned by the same dozen or so publishing conglomerates. There was a brief disruptive transition period, but the same system has now replicated itself on the worldwide web. The only difference between publishing in 1950 and 2019 is that you don’t have to hire a kid to go throw your content on people’s porches.
Also, one’s user base seems more than willing to create content for free thus reducing the need to maintain such a large staff. Timcast recently told of a salaried fellow at Buzzfeed who was let go from his Puzzle-Master position because users create them for free and the most prolific creator of quizzes (the most profitable thing that Buzzfeed does) is some kid in MI who cranks out a dozen or so per week for bupkis.
Social media sites, youtube channels, the rise of independent journalists with a camera and facebook live. Youths and even older generation are leaving mainstream media in droves. Look around once in awhile, Pat. This is bigger than fucking newspapers closing.
And RTFA next time.
And now GIMP won’t even open up for me. Really trying not to chuck this laptop across the room.
Here.
/Hands BP a dab and a torch.
And now GIMP won’t even open up for me. Really trying not to chuck this laptop across the room.
Think soothing thoughts. Then chuck it. Your aim will be better.