In the Beginning…
Percussion Caps and Rocket Balls
In the early years of the nineteenth century, there was a lot of innovation in the world of firearms. In my recent series on sixguns, we examined the results of that innovation, but there was, of course, a lot more happening in other aspects of the gun trade.
All this innovation had its genesis in one thing: The percussion cap.
Prior to this, all guns used the flintlock mechanism, which evolved from the flint-and-steel snaphaunce locks and the earlier pyrite-and-steel wheellock guns. These guns, apart from the excessively complex Collier revolver, relied on multiple barrels for multiple shots. The early percussion era continued this trend for a few years until the 1836 invention of the Paterson revolvers by Sam Colt.
The revolver mechanism, however good for sidearms, doesn’t lend itself well to long arms. Why not? Because the cylinder gap in a revolver has the tendency to vent hot gases and, if the gun’s timing is a tad off, to spit hot lead shavings. That’s not good on the non-firing arm which, in a normal stance, is positioned near that cylinder gap.
So, the advent of a practical, single-barrel, single-chamber repeating rifle had to wait in the invention of practical fixed ammunition. But that initial fixed ammunition and the guns that fired it may not be what you think.
Enter a fellow named Walter Hunt. In 1848 Hunt, a quick-witted New Yorker who invented such things as the safety pin, the lockstitch sewing machine, the first streetcar bell and street sweeping machinery, also invented the Rocket Ball self-contained cartridge. Hunt effectively did what gun cranks ever since have been trying to do; he invented a caseless rifle cartridge. The Rocket Ball cartridge was a conical bullet with a hollow base, into which was packed black gunpowder; the whole shebang was sealed with a wax cap with a small hole to allow in a spark for ignition. The Rocket Ball cartridge combined with a firearm to shoot it resulted in a real mouse gun, delivering rather less muzzle energy than a modern .25ACP pistol cartridge. It was a practical self-contained cartridge, though, suitable for feeding from the magazine of a repeating rifle. This was the very thing inventors needed to build the first magazine rifles.
The Rocket Ball was of extremely limited usefulness. Other than being a self-contained cartridge it really had nothing going for it. It was not powerful enough for hunting anything more robust than a songbird or perhaps an undernourished rabbit. Some professional and even amateur troublemakers were rumored to fear an underpowered gun more than a full-strength piece, as a full-power gun would generally go through-and-through, resulting in a relatively clean wound; on the other hand, the weaker round would plant a slug in one’s chest, dragging the grease, fouling and (usually dirty) clothing of the shootee along with it. Bear in mind this was well before the advent of modern surgery and antibiotics, so the implanted slug and it’s accompanying junk would stay in place, where the wound would suppurate and fester, often resulting in a very unpleasant death.
By and large, though, the Rocket Ball ammo was pretty much worthless as anything more than proof of concept. The concept it proved, though, was to have long-lasting implications.
Enter the Jennings
Walter Hunt wasn’t finished. He had his Rocket Ball ammunition; now he needed a rifle to fire it. After some tinkering, he came up with a repeating rifle design that used a tubular magazine under the barrel, with an underlever to lift cartridges into the chamber. As the first Rocket Ball cartridge had no primers, Hunt used an external percussion cap, just like the front-stuffers of the time. After firing, the shooter was required to work the lever to bring a new Rocket Ball into the chamber, place a new cap on the nipple, and then was able to discharge the piece again. This operation, while cumbersome by today’s standards, was still much faster than reloading a muzzle-loading piece.
Hunt lacked funds to develop his “Volitional Repeater,” and so sold his patents to a man named George Arrowsmith. Very little is known about Arrowsmith other than the fact that he had an employee named Lewis Jennings, who slicked up the action of the Volitional Repeater; Hunt then marketed it as the “Jennings Magazine Rifle.” It wasn’t a bad piece outside of its cartridge; one oddity was its combination of the action lever with the trigger, which would give any modern gun-safety advocate a bad case of the galloping collywobbles.
Probably in large part because of its weak cartridge, the Jennings rifle didn’t blow up a lot of people’s skirts. Only a few prototypes were made, one of which is in the NRA Museum today. Still, it was innovative enough to attract the attention of two gentlemen we’ve met before in our discussions of firearms history.
Remember These Guys?
One of the few customers for the Jennings Magazine Rifle was a fellow named Courtland Palmer, who purchased some Jennings repeaters for his hardware store and, eventually, also purchased the patents to those rifles from Arrowsmith. Palmer had two employees who were keenly interested in seeing this new repeater, and they promptly set about tinkering with the design, resulting in the 1851 introduction of the “Smith-Jennings Repeating Rifle.” In case you haven’t yet guessed, “Smith” was Horace Smith, and the other interested party was Daniel P. Wesson.
Yes, that Smith & Wesson.
Fewer than 2000 Smith-Jennings rifles were ever made. Those guns command some fancy prices today if you can find one; shooting an original would be out of the question even if ammo were available, and nobody (rightly so) has seen any real reason to build a replica. But Smith & Wesson weren’t done with the design.
One of the perceived problems with Hunt’s original Rocket Ball cartridge, aside from its rather pathetic power level, was that it wasn’t really a self-contained cartridge. The Jennings and later Smith-Jennings repeaters still required the shooter affix a percussion cap after levering a fresh round into the chamber. Also, the opening of the Rocket Ball cartridge that admitted the spark also admitted other things, like grease, dirt, and moisture. Smith & Wesson did the obvious; they improved the Rocket Ball by adding a fixed primer at the base of the cartridge.
A new cartridge merits a new rifle.
The redoubtable pair left the employ of Mr. Palmer and set up shop in Norwich Connecticut, originally as “The Smith & Wesson Company” but later, on the addition of a couple of investors, changing in 1855 to “The Volcanic Repeating Arms Company.” The Volcanic rifles and pistols, both using an adaptation of the Smith-Jennings lever action, was the result of that action.
In the Volcanic rifle, the form of the lever-action rifle was finally set: A rifle with a tubular magazine under the barrel, a finger lever that lifted fresh cartridges into the chamber and operated the bolt, a trigger separate from the lever and an external hammer. The Volcanic guns were still bound by the limitations of the pathetic Rocket Ball cartridge, but they were quick to load, quick to shoot, had a decent ammo capacity and used a truly self-contained cartridge, making them the first truly effective mass-produced repeating rifle.
But there just wasn’t a big market for the Volcanic. A traditional percussion-fired muzzle-loader was even more reliable and far, far more powerful. The militaries of the world were still almost universally using front-stuffing muskets and rifle-muskets, partly because they were solid and reliable, partly because they were easier to train poorly educated conscript soldiers in their use. Mountain men, sport hunters, and pot hunters after big game wouldn’t consider the Volcanic; it was just too weak.
The Volcanic company only lasted a year, closing their doors in 1856 when one of their financial partners finally forced the failing company into insolvency. Once again, Volcanic had produced something that was pretty much worthless except as proof of concept. Once again, the concept they had proved was to have long-lasting implications.
And Then This Happened
On the failure of Volcanic, Messrs. Smith & Wesson decamped to purchase Rollin White’s patent and form the “Smith & Wesson Revolver Company,” now enshrined in history and amply described in the late series on the History of The Six-Gun.
Meanwhile, the Volcanic financial partner who administered the mercy shot to the moribund Volcanic company took the remains of that organization to New Haven, Connecticut, renaming it the New Havens Arms Company. That worthy’s name was Oliver Winchester, and in 1857, he hired a plant manager named Tyler Henry. Winchester wanted the Volcanic rifle design upgraded and adapted to the newfangled brass rimfire cartridges that were just then becoming the big new thing. “Hold my beer,” Henry told Winchester, “…and watch this.” The fruit of that business union was to yield great results.
Only three years later the southern United States grew fractious. Former lever-gun builders Smith & Wesson were not to play a great part in the weaponry supplied for that contest of arms, but Winchester and Henry would prove to play a larger part.
But that’s a story for Part 2.
The revolver mechanism, however good for sidearms, doesn’t lend itself well to long arms. Why not? Because the cylinder gap in a revolver has the tendency to vent hot gases and, if the gun’s timing is a tad off, to spit hot lead shavings. That’s not good on the non-firing arm which, in a normal stance, is positioned near that cylinder gap. – wear welding gloves
I had some .44 mag that would spit copper out the gap. I got cut on my forehead once from it. It’s no joke. I still have a couple hundred rounds that I’ll never fire.
STill, it beats hot brass flying down your shirt when the guy next to you fires.
On a range in Infantry school, some hot brass got between the arm of my glasses and my face. I had a nice 5.56 brass sized brand burned into my face for about a month.
I got hot brass from the guy next to me down the back of my cammie blouse at the range once, which of course led to me accidentally flagging the line as I writhed around in agony trying to shake it out, and thus got my ass chewed out something fierce by the range officer.
*chortles of laughter at witnessing (and experiencing) similar hot brass incidents*
There is a reason that MG guys shoot right handed. Southpaws (like me) were always assistant gunners/ammo bearers
There’s always some dumbass that tries to shoot a MG left handed. Learn to operate it right handed. It’s not like writing or throwing(*).
*confession: I’m a lefty but shoot righthanded
“There’s always some dumbass that tries to shoot a MG left handed”
Usually not very long though. I’m monodexterous , if I broke my left hand I’d starve to death
Never bet against the persistence of wet behind the ears privates.
I’m a righty but only recently in life have I realized that I’m left eye dominant, which could explain my pedestrian marksmanship. One of these days I’ve been meaning to re-learn shooting a rifle left-handed to see if it helps.
I am left-eyed, but right-handed. Made for some interesting learning experiences at the archery range.
Same here – At least with pistols I shoot right but aim down the sites via the left eye.
NRA instructor I had thought it was… odd… but I can do a pretty good shot placement.
*sights
I think I told the story where I went with a girl at range here in Bucharest and a hot brass fell in her boot and she jerked the gun in my direction. Luckily the instructor was behind her and caught her arm.
I learned a long time ago to only stand directly behind inexperienced shooters and keep them within reach.
“I had some .44 mag that would spit copper out the gap.”
All cylinder gaps spit. Copper, lead, powder and gases. Some more than others. Without looking at your gun the first thing that comes to mind for me is that gap might be too wide. Second idea, the forcing cone may not be beveled enough and is shaving the bullets as they enter.
I dunno. It was only this one box of 500 rounds of cowboy action . It was weak as fuck and it spit pieces big enough to see flying.
Pissed me off, too, because a piece lodged in the gap and put a small ding on the forward edge of each flute. When I saw that, was when I stopped using it.
Another and bigger reason is that in a revolver there must be space between the base of the cartridges and the frame of the gun in order for the cylinder to be able to turn. Straight walled cases expand upon firing, slam back against the frame and then bounce back into the chambers. Cases with taper or necks will not do that. They jump back against the frame, expand and then the shoulder expands also preventing the case from going back in the chamber. The gun is them jammed.
Cases with shoulders/taper allow for much more powerful ammunition…which is the point of a rifle. With revolvers you are limited to much less powerful rounds with straight walled cases.
This is why I love glibs so much. (applies equally to the article as a whole and to this specific comment)
Bet you already know why levers aren’t chambers in .30-06
The ’95 Winchester and the Browning BLR would like a word.
Yeah, I was wondering about that, since I thought the main 30-06 gun was a lever gun.
Which one do you regard as ‘the main .30-06? Because that caliber brings to my mind the Springfield 1903 and the Garand.
I was probably thinking of the Win 95.
After a brief search, I realize that most 30-06 round guns are bolt-action.
What do you mean by main? There were 5.5 metric buttloads of Garands made.
Not Adahn: I was referring to the Win 95.I don’t have the experience a lot of Glibs have with guns; I’ve only been out shooting 6 or 7 times. One of those was with a Win 95. The owner of which told me “be careful, boy, it’s got a kick”. Which it did. Keep it tight in your shoulder.
Wow. I was wrong as could be. 30-06 is definitely a bolt-action gun, but as Animal pointed out, there are a couple exceptions.
What? You don’t want every round in your magazine except the rearmost going off at once?
That is partly a myth. I have seen experiments where guys have tried to get pointy rounds to go off in tube magazines. They never could get it to work. When they finally set a round off deliberately by other means the tube magazine couldn’t contain them enough to get all of the powder to burn and they just got a poof with minor damage to the magazine.
In spite of that I dont load pointy rounds in my tube magazine guns.
They clearly needed stronger magazine springs.
Both the ’95 Winchester and the BLR use box mags. I’ll talk about them in due course.
There was the .22 Remington Jet, but that case had a really long taper, which may have been what made it work. The .38-40 has a very slight taper but is a pretty low-pressure round.
I have seen revolvers in 22 Jet and 22 Hornet. They are kinda iffy which is why they aren’t more common.
As I remember the .22 Jet didn’t exactly blow up anyone’s skirts, sales-wise.
There must be a hundred .22 cals that are extinct. Hell, with a 22LR and a 223 Remington you can do anything that all of the others could do. I feel the same about the two dozen rifle calibers I shoot. I can do just about anything that they all do with a 30-30.
A while back I was in a gun store and a novice hunter was purchasing some really expensive rifles. We started talking and he asked what I have so I listed some off and then finished with “…but what I always carry in the woods is one of my old, rusty, scratched up model ’94s. I think I paid 200 bucks for it 30 years ago.”
I’ve got a fair selection of hunting rifles, but when packing up for a trip, I always seem to grab Thunder Speaker off the rack. It’s powerful, reliable and I always know how it’s gonna shoot. In fact I’m content enough with it that I haven’t bought a hunting rifle in quite a few years; my recent gun purchases have all been old shotguns.
There’s probably a corollary of the old “Beware the man with only one gun” in there somewhere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjIVpMqHh40
Revolvers are limited in power compared to what? Rifles? OK sure, but when x9mpared to the most popular sidearm action, the semi auto, wheel guns win the horsepower wars easily. Many auto loader s are even worse, being picky about ammo to the point of only working in a tiny window of power.
That only helps if you learn to aim.
Yes, that’s what I meant. Compared to rifles. I was responding to Pie’s observation that the revolver action isnt well suited to rifles.
good luck with that
The founding fathers did not include lever rifles when they wrote the second amendment, just muskets
Citations needed
(snarc I assume)
The founding fathers didn’t know these would be in your backyard either.
https://i.redd.it/28pr6v3v00k21.jpg
Nobody needs more than one musket ball.
But they did include private ownership of warships.
And field artillery
There’s a national debt solution for you – instead of scrapping aging warships, sell them on EBay. The Ticonderoga class is slowly being decomissioned – I got my eye on the USS Bunker Hill!
It might just work. I hear the WWF is looking for some heavy armament.
“We can blow the living FUCK outta some poachers with Tomahawks!”
That makes more sense. I read it as “World Wrestling Federation”.
Deck matches would be AWESOME
And machine guns!
What’s especially dumb is that they didn’t mean guns for hunting, either. They meant weapons of war. Weapons of war evolve, and the founders obviously understood that.
But…
/Fallout
Fantastic! I love the namedropping, even Henry, please continue Animal, this is fun.
Thanks for these wonderful articles.
Thanks for this. I love wheel guns and lever actions. Reading about them is great.
#metoo
Great history, Animal! And you have a gift for storytelling.
Looking forward to the next one!
Great article Animal!
Even (especially) old guys can and are learning a lot about the history of arms. Waiting for #2 and the Rem/Winc debate to start all over again. Thanks, Animal, really enjoyed the article.
the Rem/Winc debate
The answer to this debate, the 9mm v .45 debate, the semi-auto/wheel gun debate and others is always buy both!
Ask any emergency room doc…they cant tell the difference between the 9 and 45 wounds provided comparable ammo is used.
I thought it was the Keith/Weatherby debate?
I am unfamiliar with the Rem/Winc debate…what is it?
Lever/pump
In my lifetime I have seen the preferred sidearm go from revolver to semi-autos. This makes me sad. The late model high end revolvers were really works of art, fantastically accurate and capable of much more power. The pinnacle of that art is the S&W model 29. I have two and will never let them out of my sight.
These days people seem more interested in guns designed specifically for shooting people, another trend I find troubling. What happened to sport shooting and hunting?
” S&W model 29. I have two and will never let them out of my sight”
Nods to Suthen in agreement
YUP! I Have a 1976 29-2 in nickle with a 6.5 barrel. I will never find another firearm that feels so right to shoot. Something, something, cold dead hands…..
On Saturday, I celebrated round #1200 fired without a single malfunction through my CZ. That’s seems fairly reliable.
And there is plenty of sport shooting, although admittedly, some sport shooting is based on the concept of shooting people: http://www.ipsc.org/
Suthen, what do you think of the Colt Python? I’ve seen a lot of people tout that one as the pinnacle of revolvers. They’re beautiful, but since they’re crazy expensive I’ve never touched one.
Colt? Pish tosh. A true Glib buys their revolvers from Korth
It’s kind of funny that 150 year old technology (referring to revolvers) is still useful today.
My hatchet would like a word…
So hello to my pet rock.
*looks forlornly at pointy stick*
I was a SW guy but will say this: back in the day, when buying a Colt, figure the savings for not needing a trigger job.
Basic manufacturing is so much better these day (you’re welcome) that baseline equipment might not always need an upgrade, so maybe this is some of that old guy talk.
I have one. The forcing cone on it is cracked. That was a common problem with that gun. For reasons I dont know Colt made the forcing cones too hard and they are prone to cracking. I much prefer the S&W pistols.
I have a Diamondback also. I haven’t fired it in probably 20 years. When I carry 22 I carry my S&W. This is mostly personal preference as I am not aware of any problems with Colt’s 22 double action.
I cant find them now but the youtube assholes used to have three or four videos of pythons failing. The cracked forcing cones fail completely and the barrels fly off of the gun downrange.
Yikes….that seems, ah, less than ideal.
I have a .22 S&W with a ridiculous 7″ barrel that’s just fun to shoot. I also have a CZ 9mm that is super reliable. If I lived in a free state, I would probably buy a pocket .380 to carry even in the summer in case I did need to shoot somebody.
That’s my feeling about my Smith 25-5.
fantastically accurate
I know what you mean this far: my SW686 could drive tacks in single action, but, when the chips are down, I too have moved on from revolvers for EDC.
Fun read! Thanks, Animal!
Luke Perry has passed away.
No shit? I heard he had a stroke, but didn’t stop to consider it might be that bad.
Just came thru on the BBC news alert.
52. Damn.
Too close for comfort.
yea – same age as me. Funny he was playing a high school kid when I was 10+ years out of high school, working on my Master’s.
Well that sucks.
Damn. Good article, Animal.
But, but…we were just teaching the history of the Ottoman Empire!”
Replace “Muslim” with “Catholic” and “homosexuality” with “a healthy skepticism of transsubstantiation” and this has all the markings of a Bible War.
Now this is shaping up to be the Ali-Frazier of the intersectionality Olympics.
Frazier was gay?
Well, how do you know that he wasn’t?
If there is one thing that we can learn from prison is that anyone will suck a dick if you punch them in the head enough times.
Someone needs to give a Birmingham warning on these stories. It was making no sense for Alabama.
My reaction.
OT: Watermelon goes rogue.
Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet
But Muh Utopia.?!?!
Remember the Bernie Bro that said “We know the numbers dont work but what we are trying to do is too important for us to be held back by math.”
yep.
If the Trump video of him hugging the American flag at CPAC doesn’t make it into the next hat & hair, I’m going to act like the spoiled millennial I am!
This is beneath you.
*starts goFundMe page*
*hovers finger over the “share with all local baristas” button*
I can’t believe you forgot:
*start a petition*
I want a #MeToo story from the point of view of the flag where noted vexillosexual, Trump, sexually assaults it.
One of our PS gurus should do a side by side of Biden creeping on a young woman and Trump molesting that poor flag.
I’m sure CPRM could do a deepfake from some flag porn site. I’m sure it exists.
the cylinder gap in a revolver has the tendency to vent hot gases
I never really gave that much thought, until one day I was watching some show about guns, and they showed an ultra slo-mo shot of a revolver. If I remember correctly, it was a Navy Colt, and the thing emitted a huge sheet of flame from the cylinder gap. You wouldn’t want your fingers in there.
Because the ideas just won’t go away, I’ve decided I’ll write “Zombi Man” and see if volunteer beta readers think there’s anything wrong with it. This is the story that prompted the research and the comment “real history would get decried as racist”.
I missed the deets on this. What real history are we talking about here?
I was reading up on precolonial subsaharan africa to get a better idea of the culture and style of warfare from various regions, mainly because I like to know where reality sits before deviating from it. Despite photographic evidence and local there was a lot of stuff where my reaction was “I’d get crucified if I touched that”
I see. Interesting.
OTOH being the victim of internet mobbing sounds like it would suck, hard.
OTO, maybe it puts your novels on the map.
I was at the bottom of an internet pile. It sucked and didn’t do anything for sales. Patterico ended up bailing me out of that one.
What did you do to end up there? Anything?
It was in 2011.
Gabby Giffords shooting happens.
I see a bunch of leftists tweet things about Sarah Palin and how she needs to die or something.
I tweet something along the lines of “Oh, so I guess Sarah Palin’s next.”
Some righty saw it and put together a YouTube montage of all the anti-Palin, let’s-get-her tweets as if I hadn’t had my tongue firmly in my cheek.
I made Fox news. Specifically. Me.
I see.
I had a more verbose reply, but a key word ran away from me at the last minute and I couldn’t chase it down in time to remember.
Ugh. I still haunt certain Twitterers, and I love a good cripple fight on that platform, but I loathe it and have no desire to open another account.
Holy hell, I don’t know whether to applaud or offer apologies.
Although, if I ever do another SNP, I may have to add this episode into the mix…
If you don’t agree, reply in the next 5 minutes. Because that’s fair, right?
Psst: Mojeaux – I was just being a dick.
Like, even worse than I usually am.
Compared to today’s social media pile-ons, it wasn’t bad. Only lasted a couple of days.
If I tell you I don’t notice that/when you’re being a dick, will you be upset?
No, most take it for granted. (Sighs)
I may round up the links and let you see the campfire (not the conflagration it felt at the time).
I don’t have much of a social media presence to attack, so they’d have to cross into meatspace, where a lot of the required actions are crimes.
Not every George Lucas re-edit was wrong.
People have too much free time.
The downside of capitalism.
Though as downsides go, it’s prefereable to the alternatives.
Now that’s funny.
The little I know of guns comes from the writer Donald Hamilton, who was one of the few spy/thriller authors I know who gets the physics of shooting right. He also wrote non-fiction pieces for gun magazines, compiled in the link above.
As sources of gun knowledge go, you could do worse.
probably already discussed but I just saw this story.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/02/us/oregon-snow-taco-sauce/index.html
“It is not clear how he, or the dog, got water. A person can live five days without water and six weeks without food, according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology.”
JFC journalists really are fucking retarded. Hmmmmmm….where on earth could you find water when you’re completely surrounded by enormous snow drifts?
I just can’t even.
Taylor told investigators his SUV got stuck in the snow. He then fell asleep and woke up Monday to even more snow, unable to get out of the vehicle.
Lol. Drunk.
I guess keeping a cache of emergency winter stuff is no longer a thing?
No kidding. I had to drive to pick up the wife from the airport during this weekend’s snowpocalypse. Since I-25 is a shitshow on good days I figured anything can happen. Threw a bunch of my hunting/camping shit in the back of the SUV along with some food and water just in case. My disaster preparedness took all of 1 minute out of my life.
Food, fire and extra clothing. As you say, it’s not that difficult.
TIL: Sherrod Brown graduated college 45 years ago and, aside from a brief two year period (1991-2), has spent his entire life in elected office. Since his 1992 was dedicated to campaigning for a House seat, that means he had to find a real job for just one year of his adult life.
You assume he didn’t bum off others for that year.
One year isn’t that long for someone to mooch, if you have enough
suckersfriendsNever enough
The broad similarities between candidates may keep Sanders vulnerable on this issue: If he and other candidates have the same policy positions, but he has a less consistent record on guns, then primary opponents could point to that record to differentiate themselves — just like Clinton did in 2016.
It’s also unclear just how far Sanders’s recent shift on guns will go. The research shows the most widely touted gun control measures — universal background checks and an assault weapons ban — may not do much to reduce gun violence on their own, even if they’re a necessary foundation for broader efforts. That’s why some researchers and activists have pushed for Democrats to go further on guns and support, for example, a licensing scheme for gun ownership and policies that can reduce the number of firearms in the US.
Those background checks are just the beginning. Once they know who has the guns…
Given the make up of the SC now that shit will never fly.
You have more faith in them than I do. Not to mention tons of places have been completely ignoring Heller and McDonald and SCOTUS doesn’t give a shit.
We’re pretty close to a point now where a SCOTUS ruling on anything no longer counts as a binding legal precedent and instead only resolves that particular case.
In an optimistic mood, are we?
I’d be curious to see what gun rights cases were appealed to SCOTUS, and which ones they took/turned down. I believe there are some significant splits in the Circuits (which ordinarily SCOTUS deals with) that they have been ignoring on gun rights.
“Even if they’re a necessary foundation for broader efforts.”
And there you go…
Is that the famous camel nose?
How do we all feel about camel toes in tents?
I am good with them…in tents or anywhere else.
https://regretfulmorning.com/2013/02/13/camel-toe/
a licensing scheme for gun ownership and policies that can reduce the number of firearms in the US.
This about says it all. Licensing and registration would do nothing to reduce crime and violence, but it would let the gov’t know who has what.
A licensing scheme will only reduce the number of guns if licenses are limited, and guns are confiscated.
They used to pretend they weren’t planning for goon squads to go door-to-door seizing guns.
I made Fox news. Specifically. Me.
Fifteen minutes of infamy?
If my sales had gone up, I wouldn’t have minded so much.
Because America, That’s Why.
The guy with the flamethrower is an interesting dude.
His story.
I saw a demo of a WWII flamethrower. I sat probably 10 -15 yards behind the guy and it was pointed directly away from us.
Ho. Lee. Fuck. Where I was sitting, the heat from it was bad. I have no idea how the guys who ran them put up with it. And I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be downrange.
You should try a jet dragster. They do this throttle blap thing that makes the temp skyrocket and pop right back down, and that’s from 100 feet away. It’s amazing. Can’t imagine sustained exposure.
Slightly on-topic:
Someone at TOS posted this link which I thought was pretty cool.
1986 has lots of red. 33 years later, no red and lots of green.
Does “no-issue” mean what I think it does? No guns in Texas?!
Texas has some weird laws. Carrying a knife there is a felony, or was recently.
Assisted opening knives, butterfly knives, and big ass knives were illegal until recently. But up to 5.5″ knives were legal for as long I can remember
Open carry was illegal until recently also. At one time, both open and concealed carry were illegal in Texas.
A few years back I bought a SW 29 in Austin, TX. Before background checks. Anyway the whole event from walking into the store to paying for it was 5 minutes. The clerk pushed the gun across the counter to me and I asked for a bag, since I was parked about 1/2 block away in a residential area and I didn’t really want to walk down the street openly. The clerk told me that would make it illegally concealed but she gave me bag and I walked to the door and concealed it myself.
The clerk told me that would make it illegally concealed but she gave me bag and I walked to the door and concealed it myself.
Back when both concealed and open carry were illegal in Texas, I wonder how people managed to get their guns from the store to their homes, to and from the range, etc.
Isn’t there some locales where ownership is legal but you cn’t take your gun to the range or hunting, restricted to the home (for defense) Seems like I heard that in days gone by. How in the hell do you get it to the house in the first place?
You commit a felony – therefore having a gun in your home is proof of felonious activity.
I think that “no-issue” refers to concealed-carry.
That Texas switch from “No-Issue” to “Shall Issue” in 94/95 is also the demarcation line of when the state went from Blue to Red. Ironically given the common narrative today, the Texas push to become better on guns was led by the survivor of a mass shooting, who went around telling everyone how she would have liked to have had her gun on her that she was forced by law to keep in her car out in the parking lot.
Now add murder rate numbers for each year…
New Jersey always comes up as “May Issue”. Unless you were a cop, forget it.
Dang, but that Volcanic pistol is a pretty piece of machinery.
That they are but as mentioned in the article they are pathetically weak. That is why the rocket ball type ammo never took off, so to speak. Hell, anything other than large caliber muzzle loading pistols up until the 357 mag were weak as hell. Some of the cap and ball revolvers in large caliber were ok…ish, but if you needed any kind of reliable knockdown you went with a rifle.
I would still love to have a Volcanic to hang on the wall.
Also, for anyone that doesn’t give shit about the newest and brightest,a href=”https://redirect.viglink.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgog.com&key=fb3da3418dae370da3c415cf613a8b86>Good old Games. Cheap old games.
Oh, fuck you. https://www.gog.com/
And they’re DRM free. They do have some modern games on there as well. They’re affiliated with CDProjektRed (developer of the Witcher series of games) through their publisher.
I love that they won’t compromise on no-DRM and thus lose out on lots (but not all) new AAA stuff, and don’t care. I always encourage people to get Witcher products from them (and because I’m assuming that CDPR gets a better cut than from Steam).
Ehhhh… I think they care. And they gave up on Gwent being a GOG exclusive because they weren’t getting the sales they expected. If you’re an old gamer, they’re a great place to impulse buy games you had on disk (YES DISK) or CD years ago for just a couple of bucks.
I think they said Gwent was always going to be timed exclusive, since Witcher series is on Steam. Thronebreaker was similarly limited to the GOG for the first…four weeks? Three? Cyberpunk will probably be simultaneous, since they are partnering with a publisher, AFAIK.
Layoffs are a bad sign though 🙁
Awesome article. I love that, just like with the six-gun history, almost as soon as it begins the general shape is pretty much set, and yet iterations over time are visible. Doesn’t hurt that it just has all kinds of style.