Winchester Ascendant
No, Not That Henry – the Original Henry
In 1857 Oliver Winchester had taken the remnants of Volcanic to New Haven, Connecticut, where he reformed the manufactory as the New Haven Arms Company. He employed a new design guy, and that designer, Benjamin Tyler Henry, designed a rifle and cartridge that significantly improved on the Volcanic.
First, the cartridge: The copper-cased .44 Henry Flat rimfire cartridge was anemic by today’s standards, firing a 200-grain lead bullet at 1125 fps for a muzzle energy of 570 ft-lbs. But compared to the old Rocket Ball ammo fired by the Jennings and Volcanic repeaters, the .44 Henry was a real powerhouse, roughly the equivalent of the modern .45ACP; here, at last, was a repeating rifle cartridge with enough power for medium-sized game at close range and even for work against two-legged antagonists.
Second, the rifle: The brass-framed 1860 Henry retained the better features of the Volcanic, namely, the tubular magazine, the large underlever with a separate trigger, the external hammer, and front and rear sights mounted on the barrel, although a tang sight was also available on the Henry. The Henry’s tubular magazine was the first “high-capacity” magazine to be mass produced. Henry rifles were favored by skirmishers, scouts, and cavalry during the War of the Northern Aggression, and many a common soldier saved his pay to buy one, back in those innocent times when a soldier could bring his personal weapon to the fray. A Confederate soldier named John Singleton Mosby famously (and apocryphally) said that the Henry “let the Yankees load up on Sunday and shoot at us all week.”
Some 14,000 rifles were built by the New Haven Arms Company during the war, and a great number of these found their ways into the hands of soldiers, who quickly learned the advantage of rate-of-fire. The Rebels managed to get ahold of a handful of Henrys, mostly by capture, but the Confederacy’s arms industry couldn’t scrounge enough copper to replicate any useful amounts of the .44 Henry cartridge. So, the Henry’s advantages were mostly realized by the North, who used it along the Spencer repeaters and various single-shot breechloaders. This was the first en masse use of repeating rifles in a major war.
But the Henry had a weakness. Like the Volcanic before it, the magazine loaded from the front. This meant taking the gun out of commission to top up the load; one had to unshoulder the piece, withdraw the magazine follower and spring and load new rounds in from the front. The follower was withdrawn by a tab protruding from the magazine tube, which withdrew along an open slot, which allowed dust, dirt, grit, and moisture into the magazine tube. This was a less than ideal situation; a better way to load the piece was necessary.
It is one of the greater ironies of the gun world that a company today, calling itself Henry, makes lever guns with a very similar weakness.
The Henry rifle had a successful run, but when the War Between the States finally wrapped up in 1865, a nation looking West was going to need repeating rifles and plenty of ‘em.
The 1866 Winchester
A year after the end of the War of The Northern Aggression, Oliver Winchester was (for reasons I have not been able to determine) in Europe. His employee Henry, apparently disgruntled with his compensation, petitioned to have the Connecticut Legislature seize the New Haven Arms Company and turn it over to him.
Oliver Winchester returned home and put a stop to this early attempt at crony capitalism by reorganizing the New Haven Arms Company into something bigger, better and Henry-less. He gave this new organization his name: The Winchester Repeating Arms Company.
Thus, was a firearms industry legend born.
As part of the reorganization, Winchester caused the basic Henry rifle to be redesigned. The new rifle, released in 1866, was the first rifle to carry the Winchester name; it differed from the Henry in having a bronze-alloy frame instead of brass, and in loading through a gate in the side of the receiver. This innovation allowed for the addition of a wooden fore-end to make the rifle easier to handle while making it possible for the magazine tube to be completely sealed against the elements.
In the 1866 Winchester the basic form of the lever-action rifle was complete; a sealed tubular magazine that loaded through a spring-loaded gate in the side of the receiver, a trigger separate from the lever, an external hammer and sights on the barrel. This pattern would remain the standard until the very last years of the 19th century.
But the 1866 retained the Henry’s .44 rimfire cartridge. Settlers, guntwists and other folks moving West were going to need more power in a repeater. Just a few short years after the introduction of the 1866, Winchester was set to give it to them.
The Gun That Won the West – The 1873
If the year 1873 rings a bell, it’s because we looked at it in the recent series on sixguns. That was the birth-year of a true American legend in sidearms, the Colt Single Action Army.
1873 was also the year Winchester released the next iteration of the lever gun, the steel-framed 1873. This rifle used the same toggle-link action as the 1866 Wincheste, but had a beefier, stronger steel frame. Best of all, it used a new, more powerful centerfire cartridge, the .44 Winchester Center Fire (WCF) later known as the .44-40 Winchester.
Often referred to as the Gun That Won the West, the 1873 was made until 1923 and was later offered in .38 WCF (.38-40) and .32 WCF (.32-20) calibers. Eventually, Winchester reworked the 1866 to fire the newer .44 WCF cartridge, and that rifle sold well until 1899, partly because the bronze-alloy framed 1866 was cheaper than the 1873.
The real genius of the 1873, though, was in its alliance with that famous revolver that introduced that same year. Colt quickly began building the Single Action Army in .44WCF, calling that version the “Frontier Six-Shooter.” Remington quickly followed by building their 1875 revolver chambered for the .44WCF. Now, a horseman, prospector, lawman or outdoorsman could carry one cartridge for both rifle and revolver. The system was well-regarded and received enthusiastic endorsements from such folks as William F. Cody. There was even a movie made about the ’73 Winchester, starring Jimmy Stewart and Shelley Winters and co-starring a “One Of One Thousand” special-edition rifle. This set a trend of movies where an actor shares top billing with a rifle, a trend that continued with such films as Carbine Williams and Quigley Down Under.
Today, despite the large number of guns built, original 1866 and 1873 Winchesters command some fancy prices. Fortunately for the hobby shoote,r there are several companies making replicas, and some offer varieties not seen in the original guns, like chamberings in the popular .357 and .44 Magnums as well as the venerable old .45 Colt. I’ve handled a couple of these guns and shot one, a Uberti 1873 carbine replica in .45 Colt. They retain the feel of the originals while employing better metallurgy, closer tolerances and using more powerful ammo.
It was ammo, in fact, that led to the next major innovation to come out of the New Haven works. While the 1873 was solid, reliable and (for its time) accurate, it still fired a handgun cartridge. The .44 WCF was an order of magnitude more powerful than the .44 Henry Flat it replaced, but the sportsman afield after elk, moose or bison was still pretty much bound to a single-shot like the Remington Rolling Block and, of course, the Sharps.
So far no truly successful repeater handling full-power cartridges like the .45-70 was being mass-produced. That left a big, gaping hole in the market. Shooters wanted a repeating rifle with some thump, and Winchester was about to let them have it.
The Centennial – the 1876
Until 1876, the outdoor adventurer faced with two bison would have nothing more to do than look down at his Sharps or Remington single-shot rifle and pick one bison to shoot. But after Winchester introduced the Model 1876, he could shoot both!
The 1876 was an 1873 Winchester writ large, retaining that basic toggle-link design in a bigger, heavier frame capable of handling full-length, full-power rounds. The ‘76 was introduced in the Winchester .45-75 cartridge, loading 75 grains of black powder behind a 500-grain .45 caliber bullet, delivering that thump that shooters were looking for in a repeater. Four versions were offered; the 22” barreled carbine, the 26” Express with a half-length magazine, the 28” Sporting Model and the 32” Musket.
Not only sportsmen found the ’76 appealing. The Canadian Mounties bought a number of them, as did the Texas Rangers; Geronimo was in possession of a ‘76 when he surrendered to the Army in 1888. The “Centennial” Winchester even caught the eye of a certain young New York whippersnapper name of Theodore Roosevelt, who had come west to try his hand at ranching.
The ’76 was popular enough, but despite Winchester’s expansion of its loadings to include the .40-60, .45-60 and .50-95 rounds, the ’76’s toggle-link action still wasn’t quite long enough to handle the popular .45-70 Government rounds, meaning that users had to depend on Winchester’s proprietary ammo.
The Centennial represented the last of the first-generation Winchester rifles. The company continued making the ’76 until 1897, but well before that, it was overshadowed by a new generation of Winchesters. This first generation saw its heyday but of late has seen something of a renaissance, as several manufactories have resumed production of the 1866, 1873 and 1876 Winchesters. These new guns, made with modern metals, modern manufacturing techniques and firing modern ammo, would drive any 19th century hunter, gunslinger or cowboy green with envy. It’s a testament to their lasting design that they are still useful on the range and in the field.
Oliver Winchester died in 1880 at seventy years of age. Ownership of the Winchester Repeating Arms Company passed to his son, William Wirt Winchester, who died four months later of tuberculosis. William Winchester’s widow, Sarah Winchester, believed the family was cursed by the spirits of people killed by Winchester rifles, and so moved to San Jose, California and used her portion of the inheritance and income from the Winchester Repeating Arms Company to open the Winchester Mystery House. This house was intended to confuse and discombobulate those spirits who were (perhaps understandably, if you believe in that sort of thing) peeved at having been sent to their rewards with the products of the New Haven gunmakers. The Winchester House still stands in San Jose; that area is still known for anti-gun sentiment and general kookery of all sorts. It is interesting to reflect that a Winchester and Winchester money may have started off the trend of Bay Area lunacy.
Winchester Repeating Arms Company continued humming along, though, and three years after Oliver Winchester’s death, big things were to happen.
And Then This Happened
Winchester had a fair amount of competition from the late 1850s through the late 1890s. In 1860 Christopher Spencer brought out a solid, rugged repeating rifle that used an underlever to operate the gun but was nevertheless very different than the Henry and Winchester offerings. Later, in the mid-1870s, a man named John Marlin entered the gun trade, building an inexpensive pocket revolver, a few shotguns – and lever-action rifles. Marlin’s guns sold for a bit less than Winchester offerings but were good, solid, accurate rifles for their time. A few other makers get involved as well, including classic six-gun maker Colt – but that’s a story for Part 3.
Meanwhile: The folks at Winchester had a plan, a plan that was so clever you could paint it red and call it a fox. As of 1883, they had a brand-new partnership with a certain gun designer out of Ogden, Utah, fellow name of John Moses Browning. That relationship with the DaVinci of Firearms would prove long and profitable for both parties. Some honest-to-gosh American firearms legends were about to start rolling off Winchester’s lines, and American shooters would be richer for it. More on that in Part 4.
I’ve got a Winchester 1873 in .32-20 that belonged to my grandmother.
That’s a damn fine small game cartridge.
I had a bunch of work done on it to put it back in shooting form. It’s as tight as the day it came out of the box.
My mind immediately thought “The mechanism is locked up and won’t actuate.”
It was pretty worn out, full of rust and the lever spring was broken. The gunsmith has to build up some metal so it would actually go into half cock. There was also a crack in the fore stock. My dad was pretty hard on it as a kid.
It didn’t fall into the lake?
The only one that didn’t. But it’s not one of those evil semi-auto type weapons.
Can you imagine facing off against an enemy that has 5-8 times your rate of fire, let alone trying to charge or advance against them? Jeebus. The North would’ve won in less than a year, even if every Confederate soldier was objectively a better shot.
“The North would’ve won in less than a year…”
…if they all had repeating rifles…
(and much less incompetent leadership)
“Your men are wasting ammunition, General.”
/Department of War
Yeah, but what if the South countered with a couple hundred thousand AK-47’s?
+1 Harry Turtledove
Excellent, Animal. Very interesting for those of us into guns and the history. First gun I bought with my own money was a ’94 30-30, at a pawn shop in Mpls. My dad had to take me in and explain the benefits of the gun to a 14 year old me. Finally gave that gun to my son. Waiting for # 4 so I can get the history on a ’94. My brother had a 38-55, maybe an ’86? Thanks for your effort.
The ’94 was available in .38-55. I’ve been sort of watching for a pre-64 Model 94 in .38-55 for a while now; it’s a good mid-range rifle with enough punch for elk.
I just checked Gun-Broker, yeah, probably a ’94, 26″ hexagon barrel. They are getting pricey now. I think he paid $35 for in, about 1950, I paid $40 for my 30-30 in ’52.
Pricey indeed. If I can find a good shootable gun in good shape, I’ll probably have to shell out a couple grand.
Great series, Animal. Looking forward to part 4. Hopefully, there’ll be something on my own favorite lever gun – the Savage 99.
If wishes were rifles I’d be enjoying a 99 right now.
You can rest assured that the 99 will appear in both part 4 and part 5.
OT: Was HM the owner of this database?
Couldn’t be – there was no column indicating thicc-ness.
It’s China. Thiccness isn’t particularly prevalent.
Only in Trump’s China SMDH
My family had a couple of Henry rifles with the “LL” on the serials for the Legendary Lawman makes. Sadly, one of my cousins pawned one and my uncle had the other modern blued… Family…
OT: Guys, it’ll totally work this time!
Nothing would break the backs of the gangs like drug legalization but I doubt that’s what they have in mind.
When the hell are they going to get it that the native population in the middle east DO NOT want western style democracy? They’re not going to get it, are they?
The article is about Central America.
But they don’t want democracy either.
“We don’t need an Iraq-scale nation-building project.”
Hmm, maybe I should read more than the first sentence. Oh, Central America, they don’t want anything there, they want to come to the US.
I hovered over the link.
By “Western Style Democracy” they mean socialism – just like they already have.
“We should also condition aid on better governance and demand tangible results”
Same as the other times only this time we really mean it! Maybe put a doctrine together and put the president’s name on it, to keep any one with other ideas out of the hemisphere.
Animal, thanks for doing the research and effort to write these articles, very entertaining and informative.
^This.
Great article, as usual. I’ve been drooling over a nice Marlin .357 lever action at the gun shop recently. Might grab it if the gov gives me enough of my own money back with my tax refund.
I’m confused tho, article title says Part 2, but then you reference more to come in Part 4. Are we skipping Part 3?
Shouldn’t the next part be Part 5?
Just throw it already.
I also reference more to come in part 3. Look in the first paragraph under “And Then This Happened.”
Oh yes, I see. My apologies, sometimes my reading comprehension is selective.
I’ve got one of those. Need to shoot it again.
It should also neutralize the gangs and smugglers that plague the region, much as we did in the ’80s with subversive terrorist groups.
Piece of cake.
We shut down them rum runners, didn’t we?
Sure did. Right after we repealed the 18th amendment.
/Looks through last week’s archive.
Sure did.
I don’t remember Shining Path coming to an end like that….
OT: Columbus Vice cop facing federal charges.
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus-police-vice-officer-facing-federal-charges/1840158973
You country folks trying to match the corruption of Cuyahoga county.
Unrelated, I’ll be down in the Buckeye Lake area at the end of May.
Rock on the Range?
No, the girlfriend and I bought tickets for Camp Anarchy, though we’ll be staying elsewhere. The amount of rules at Camp Anarchy was too much. How the fuck do you enjoy camping with no fire, no sporting equipment, no in and out privileges (hope you brought enough ice), and no knives? We’re getting in the Thursday before the show starts, so we’re free that night, and up until the afternoon Friday.
Anarchy and punk are all about rules, apparently.
Well, they do tend to be fairly milquetoast Lefties so… yeah.
The brother-in-law and I were joking about the rules over Christmas. They don’t seem to grasp that their target audience is us 40 year old guys who grew up with the bands. Fuck, the youngsters won’t even know half of the bands. Shit, I was surprised that Suicidal Tendencies was still together (and isn’t considered a headliner). I have a feeling that the rules were required by the campground, but damn man. Come up with a better name then Camp Anarchy when your rules are that onerous.
Big Brother’s Camp Anarchy?
I’m thirty and recognize slightly less than half, so you’re spot on. As for the rules, most I understand as restrictions from the camp grounds, but I’m confused but some, like banning knives, specifically calling out cooking and steak knives? That’s more extreme than any camp ground I’ve ever been to. And I’m really curious why they are banning mirrors of all things.
My 20-something niece had heard of two of the bands, and her boyfriend had heard of a couple more.
If I were to put down money on the reason for the rules, I would guess it was for liability insurance. They’re probably calling out the cooking and steak knives to avoid people getting pissed (which will happen anyways). Who would think that if you’re going camping, you could grill up some steaks and eat them, perhaps with some sliced foil wrapped roasted potatoes?
Mirrors are probably trying to emphasis the no glass rules (or someone thinks mirrors are a requirement for cocaine).
I thought this was tongue in cheek at first.
Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly, and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.
Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture,should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.
Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete.
Discontinue use of Happy Fun Ball if any of the following occurs:
itching
vertigo
dizziness
tingling in extremities
loss of balance or coordination
slurred speech
temporary blindness
profuse sweating
or heart palpitations
If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types of skin.
When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration. Failure to do so relieves the makers of HappyFun Ball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company, Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.
Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing green substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.
Happy Fun Ball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
You missed a few
FESTIVAL GROUNDS NOT ALLOWED
View List
Bad Vibes / Bad Attitudes
Weapons, knives, firearms or anything that security / police deem a weapon
Colors / No Patches Of Affiliation (Motorcycle Club, Gang, etc.)
Glass of any kind, including glass bottles
Outside Food and Drinks
Beach umbrellas
Narcotics and drug paraphernalia. Marijuana is still illegal to consume in public.
Alcohol of any kind
Drones or any other unmanned aircraft.
Kites
Marker pens and spray paint
Hammocks / Other Lounging Equipment
Water Guns and Water Balloons
Bicycles, skateboards, rollerblades, scooters (motorized or push), hoverboards, Segway’s.
Fireworks or other explosives
Glow Sticks
Totems / Flags / Flag Poles
Megaphones, PA Systems, Air Horns
Coolers Of Any Kind
Pets (Service Animals Exempt)
Video Recording Equipment
Professional Cameras and Camera Equipment
Audio Recording Equipment
Amplified sound devices (Wireless speakers, etc.)
Flyers / Stickers
Selfie sticks
Security has final say on allowed and prohibited items.
So you can camp, but can’t bring any tools to set up your tent? And only one type of fire allowed for cooking? Booooring.
Those rules are for the festival grounds yourself. The other set of rules is for the campground.
Have you ever tried to run an anarchist collective? Sure it looks easy from the outside, but all the infighting, the 40oz of Mickey’s piling up, and all those fuckers filching my cigarettes. It really bums me out, man.
/puts on SLC Punk again
Do you take turns, to act as sort of an officer for the week but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting.
“no in and out privileges”
You need to find sluttier girls to go camping with.
Yeah, those rules are crap. Not sure what I’ll have going on but will put on calendar in hopes we can have a few beers or something.
There’s a reason we’re camping somewhere else, that will let me bring down more then 1 case of beer per vehicle. I know there’s a brewery in the area as well, no idea if they’re any good though.
Went to the Winchester Mystery House as a kid and thoroughly enjoyed it. Personally, if Widow Winchester wasn’t insane at the start, that length of constant home renovation would have finished the job.
Lucy McBath, gun grabber and Congressperson
And then there’s so many people around the country that still continue to suffer violently by unnecessary gun violence, and so on. Until we can eradicate this extremist culture, still, justice is not served.
———
Well, because, you know—and in light of all the work that I’ve done around the country the last six years—what we’ve begun to understand is that universal background checks for all gun sales is probably the No. 1 most common-sense way to be able to change the extremist culture that we’re living under. You’ve got over ninety per cent of Americans in the country—and this is including, you know, law-abiding gun owners and hunters and law enforcement—that believe universal background checks is probably the greatest way to save as many lives as possible.
Her son and his friends picked the wrong time and place to be jackass caricatures. Some other asshole did something egregiously stupid and started shooting at them. Now he’s in jail for life, her kid is dead, and she wants to make every gun owner in America feel her pain.
Sorry, lady. Collective punishment is a crime against humanity. Where are the United Nations human rights police, when you need them.
Wanting to keep your Constitutional rights is now extremist. After they get all of the guns, the first amendment will also be extremist. Oh wait, it already is.
I, for one, eagerly await the day in which the 3rd amendment is extremist.
Finally, someone else will be in my bunk!
“eradicate this extremist culture”
Last one in the Gulag is a rotten egg!
What a POS. Damaged and deranged people have no business holding office.
“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.”
Until we can eradicate
Interesting choice of words. Also, you are in open violation of your oath of office.
Her personal tragedy doesn’t even apply, anyway. The man who killed her son had a concealed carry permit. Which means he’d already met the standards of a background check.
I have a Marlin 1895 in .45-70. I love that gun and I love the lever platform in general.
Me too – mine’s an 1895G with an IER scope and a big lever loop. It’s a great old thumper for sneaking through dark timber. I call it the Bullwhacker.
“I call it the Bullwhacker.”
I thought we were talking about a rifle here.
Also yes.
Haha, false alarm!
And you know, also, too—it’s just, you know, the fear-mongering that you need to be afraid of people that don’t look, think, or act like you. Everyone’s coming to get your gun. And that’s just once they—once you pass background checks, then what’s going to happen next? Well, you know, that’s just simply not the truth.
Can’t you get it through your pig ignorant hick skulls? We just want to eradicate this extremist culture. That’s totally different than getting guns out of the hands of anyone we don’t like or trust. It’s not like we want to disarm the Capitol Police. That would be crazy.
I don’t know what’s more pathetic; that they actually expect us to believe them, or that some tiny percentage of “the wolf will eat me last” types actually *will* believe them.
The amount of rules at Camp Anarchy was too much.
*Raises hand. Lowers it.*
Never mind.
Words mean whatever I say they mean!
Gol’, those anarchists are so BOSSY!
And here I thought it was Stalin’s ghost reanimating the Red Army to go reprogram Diebold machines.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/google-manager-fake-news-and-hate-speech-are-how-trump-won-the-election/
You see this country really is filled with KKK members just waiting to start up the invisible empire again. It’s amazing that Obama ever won!
So they are saying that they believe a majority of Americans are so stupid/gullible that they can be easily swayed by fake news they see on the Internet?
* Reads CNN headlines *
Yes, apparently they are.
I wonder if Lucy McBath agrees with Mike Bloomberg that black men in particular cannot be trusted to possess firearms.
Is it weird that I initially read the author as “Lady Macbeth”?
Honest mistake.
Either of these quotes sound like they might be up your alley…
Unsex me here, And fill me from the crown to the toe topful of direst cruelty!
But screw your courage to the sticking place, and we’ll not fail.
Rough day, and not in the good way.
Took the cat to the vet for a cleaning of her teeth a while back. And during surgery the poor things heart rate fell. They had to bring her around and stop the surgery prematurely. today was the appointment with the Vet cardiologist (Fuck you socialism, you don’t get cardiologists for your pets in a socialist country).
She has mild heart disease and while she doesn’t presently need any meds or special treatment, this has me feeling like shit.
I adore that little furball in a way I can’t really describe. I never thought I was much of a cat person, but she won me over. She meets me at the door, follows me around the house, and always wants to be near me. She follows instructions and I’ve even taught her a trick. She’s happiest curled up beside me, purring away as I stroke the unbelievably soft fur of her head. And I guess I am seeing her mortality. She’s 11 years old give or take, and best case is she’s got another 11, but more likely 5-8. And when the time comes I’m gonna be a wreck and this vet visit was a little preview of that.
Anyway, she’s getting some salmon tonight when I make dinner.
Aw man – sorry to hear of your bad feline news.
One of my worst days was coming home from shopping and finding our 6yo cat dead on the dresser. She would normally jump up there to take a nap; also a safe place from the other cat who is more of a ground hugger. Anyways she had been to the vet the previous day with a clean bill of health. Needless to say they didn’t check her heart.
I buried her in the backyard on a miserable March day, wrapping her up in a towel and with a few toys. And yes I was sobbing like a school boy. I’ve had cats die before but we got to decide when it was their time to go. The suddenness of this death really go to me.
Anyways – best of luck for yer kitty.
There is no good way having had similar experiences.
Simply enjoy the time you have with the little furball.
Yeah, we bond with our pets. I feel ya, bro.
They are hard to lose. When we got the Dean Beasts as wee little barbarians, one of the first thoughts I had was “They will break my heart.” And they will. And it will have been worth it.
Good kitty. Times like this I’m glad the tom I had just wandered out the door one day and never stopped back by. For the rest of my life, in my mind, he’ll be hand fed tuna by some sweet old lady and neither of them will ever age.
And here I thought Gen Z was supposed to be this great backlash against woke stupidity.
https://www.axios.com/exclusive-poll-young-americans-embracing-socialism-b051907a-87a8-4f61-9e6e-0db75f7edc4a.html
If these numbers are to be believed, we are right and truly fucked.
On the plus side, we’re gonna run out of money really fast.
How can we run out of money? We’ll just print more.
“On the plus side, we’re gonna run out of money really fast.”
I thought we were spending the other guy’s, you know, the rich guys’ money, the ones that don’t pay enough taxes. What happened with that?
Orange Man Bad’s tax reform increased their taxes! Oh, wait.
Congratulations. You are now rich.
Pay your fair share for a new society. You don’t want be like those mean libertarians who want to cut out the middleman of government. They’ll probably waste their money on hookers and blow and you would still have to support them.
Looks like garbage to me. No indication of sample size that I saw. There’s a massive stolen base by lumping together Gen-Z and millenials, but talking only about Gen-Z, and less than half would prefer to live in a socialist country. Most of them just don’t know anything yet, and like the idea of not having to pay for their education.
And this is all in the face of the massive indoctrination machine that is public education.
“President Trump and the previous Republican Congress stripped our ability to deduct all state income and local property taxes on federal returns.”
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-skelton-income-tax-california-wealthy-20190311-story.html
Evil Nazi OrangeMan won’t let the rest of the country subsidize our absurdly high taxes anymore! He’s such a MEANIE!!
I have people in NJ saying that to me.
Me: “You’re still paying less with the cut in income tax rates, right?”
Them: “Well, yes but it’s not fair!”
Me: “Fair for people in other states to cover your property tax?”
Silence
“Only people who are pretty well off are affected by that, especially since the standard deduction nearly doubled, which helped lower-income households.
On the whole, I think this reform helped people who are less well off, and increased taxes on some people who are better off. Weren’t you in favor of taxing the rich?”
Hell, I fell into the standard deduction this year. It wasn’t even close. That’s with my real estate taxes and mortgage interest.
I haven’t filed yet. We took a bit of haircut on the SALT cap. I should probably double-check if the standard deduction would work better for us.
Funny how tax breaks aren’t called “subsidies” when it applies to them.
‘“Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I’m on television every weeknight live for an hour,” Carlson continued. “If you want to know what I think, you can watch. Anyone who disagrees with my views is welcome to come on and explain why.”’
https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-wont-offer-contrition-naughty-past-comments-about-statutory-rape/
Never. Apologize.
Fer fuck sake, it was a shock-jock call-in. The point is to be provocative. Tucker is exactly right to not back down.
He also did not say anything wrong.
He did not endorse statutory rape, he quite correctly pointed out that marrying someone underage is different than grabbing a random kid off the street and raping them.
Excellent.
Love your series, Animal, looking forward to the next ones.
Super late to the party, but damn, Animal, these are so good. I get the feeling, though, that you are enjoying these as much as we are.
And, you’d be right.