In the Beginning…
There Were Needles.
Unlike our previous two historical studies, this one begins in Europe. The story of bolt-action guns begins in 1824, with a German inventor named Johann Nikolaus von Dreyse.
This was a time when the percussion ignition system was just beginning to replace the flintlock in the game fields and militaries of the civilized world. Most of the guns using the newfangled fulminate ignition systems didn’t change much from the flintlock pattern; they were still single-shot front-stuffers, differing only in a slightly cleaner and more reliable means of igniting the powder charge. Across the Atlantic, the Rocket Ball self-contained cartridge was not yet a gleam in Walter Hunt’s eye, but Johann von Dreyse was already thinking of what the percussion ignition system might allow one to do.
It’s important to note that, at this time, breech-loaders were hardly a new thing. Henry VIII owned a breech-loading fowling piece. In the American Revolution, some British troops were even armed with Ferguson flintlock breech-loaders, a single-shot affair where the trigger guard rotated to lower a plug to allow ball and powder to be loaded. In 1811, an American named John Hancock Hall invented another breech-loading flintlock, this one using a lever to raise a portion of the breech that loaded from the front.
In 1824, in his home stadt of the Archbishopric of Mainz, von Dreyse started a factory to manufacture the new percussion caps. Not content to supply the demand for fulminate ignitors, Von Dreyse wanted to make a breech-loader for sale to the Prussian Army, but the new percussion system led to better ideas than the previous flintlock breechloaders were capable of; what von Dreyse came up with was quite a bit better, in fact, than Hunt’s anemic Rocket Ball.
The cartridge resulting from von Dreyse’s work was a real oddball by today’s reckoning. The new round used an 15.4mm (roughly .60 caliber) egg-shaped bullet held in a paper sabot, with a black powder charge in a paper case behind the bullet. The percussion primer was placed at the base of the bullet, requiring a striker to pierce the paper case and pass through the entire powder charge to ignite the primer. This required something longer and thinner than what we are accustomed to nowadays as firing pins; it was, in fact, something very needle-like. What von Dreyse came up with in 1836 and the Prussians adopted five years later (apparently military procurement in those days was several orders of magnitude more efficient than today, requiring only five years to test and approve a new service weapon) was the Leichtes Perkussionsgewehr Model 1841 (Light Percussion Rifle Model 1841) but which became better known as the Zündnadelgewehr, or Needle Gun.
The Dreyse Needle Gun had several virtues. It was simple, the breechloading mechanism being a cylindrical receiver in which the breechblock rotated and drew to the rear to load the paper cartridge; the breechblock was moved with a simple projecting handle with a round knob, forming the first bolt-action breechloader to be adopted by a major military. The Dreyse breechloader allowed Prussian troops, no slouches by any measure, to increase their rate of fire and therefore be even more efficient at slaughtering their enemies.
The needle gun cartridge even had an advantage that cannot exist with metal-case ammunition. Igniting the powder charge at the front of the load actually results in a more efficient burn, with the propellant gas expanding from just behind the bullet and consuming more of the charge within the barrel rather than blowing a portion of the unburnt powder from the muzzle, making the flash so characteristic of black-powder arms.
But the Dreyse Needle Gun likewise had several weaknesses. The needle, while designed for easy replacement, was fragile and prone to breakage. The gun, like most black-powder pieces, fouled quickly. When hot and dirty from repeated firing, the bolt took considerable strength to open. But the needle gun was successful enough to warrant an upgrade to cast steel barrels and a stronger action in the 1862 model, and eventually the factory in Mainz was cranking out 30,000 rifles a year; all in all the various militaries of the German states fielded over a million needle guns, and orders came in from as far away as Romania and even Japan.
In one of history’s little ironies, it was in a Prussian triumph that the Dreyse needle gun saw its end. In 1870 the Franco-Prussian War broke out. While the Prussians won that war, the French Chassepot breechloader, also based on a turn-bolt action, proved so superior to the Dreyse as to make the German states look to upgrade.
How they would do that would lead to the rise to prominence of one of the most famous names in gun-making. But before we examine that, let’s look at the French pieces that led to this decision.
The French? Yes, the French.
In the 1870 Franco-Prussian war, the Prussian troops found themselves facing French soldiers armed with the Chassepot rifle. That weapon’s history has some interesting parallels with the Dreyse.
In the mid-1850s, a French inventor and gunsmith named Antoine Alphonse Chassepot was, like the German von Dreyse, messing about with breechloaders. Like von Dreyse, he had ambitions of selling a breech-loading rifle to the military, albeit the French Army rather than the Prussian.
What he came up with was the single-shot bolt-action breechloader adopted by the French Army as the Fusil modèle 1866. Like the Dreyse, it used a paper cartridge, firing an 11mm (more or less .44 caliber) bullet at a higher muzzle velocity than the bigger bullet of the Dreyse; this led to greater accuracy at longer ranges. Like the Dreyse, the Chassepot was technically a needle gun, using a long, sharply pointed firing pin to fire the primer located inside the paper case, although in the French arm the primer was loaded at the rear of the cartridge.
Unlike the Dreyse, the Chassepot had a better gas seal in the form of a rubber “obdurator” on the bolt, which along with the lighter bullet led to higher muzzle velocities. The French rifle also had sights marked up to 1,600 meters as opposed to the Dreyse’s 600 meters. However, like the Dreyse, the Chassepot rifle was prone to fouling in the action, making the rifle difficult to use when heated and dirty. This was in large part due to the paper cartridge’s inability to form a good gas seal. The addition of the rubber gas seal helped, but the paper cartridge was the problem.
Because of this, the Chassepot rifle was only used in its original form for eight years. To properly examine what came next, we must first look across the English Channel, and across the Atlantic.
A New, Better Cartridge
Paper cartridges had several disadvantages. They were fragile, unsuited for use in any kind of repeater, primers were difficult to fix in place, and they could not form a good gas seal in the action. In the Americas at this time several gunmakers like Spencer and Henry were experimenting with rimfire cartridges, but those also had the limitations of only being suitable for low-powered rounds due to the weakness of the case head and not being reloadable.
But in 1866, two men were working on a solution to that problem and, in an inarguable case of convergent evolution in technology, the solutions they came up with were very similar.
In the United States, the man in question was a New Yorker named Hiram Berdan, who patented a solid-head brass case with a centerfire primer. Berdan’s primer was a simple cap that tightly fit the aperture in the case head, forming a good seal, while the anvil for the primer formed part of that case head, while the flash from the primer entered the case through two small holes on either side of the anvil.
Meanwhile, in Great Britain, Colonel Edward Mounier Boxer of the Royal Arsenal in Woolrich, came up with a primer that, like Berdan’s, fit tightly in an aperture in the solid brass case head; unlike Berdan’s primer, the anvil was contained in the primer, while the flash entered the case though a central aperture. This made the Boxer primer better suited for reloading, as the central flash hole made de-capping much easier.
In one of life’s little ironies, today the Berdan primer is used primarily in Europe, while modern American ammunition uses almost exclusively Boxer primers.
As was true with lever guns in the United States, the advent of brass-cased, fixed ammunition would have significant influence on the development of bolt guns in Europe.
The French Adapt
In 1870 the British Army adopted the famous falling-block Martini-Henry rifle, immortalized by Rudyard Kipling in his poem The Young British Soldier:
When ‘arf of your bullets fly wide in the ditch,
Don’t call your Martini a cross-eyed old bitch;
She’s human as you are — you treat her as sich,
An’ she’ll fight for the young British soldier.
Cross-eyed old bitch the Martini-Henry may have been, but the .450/577 paper-patched brass cartridge it used caught the attention of the French. France responded by adapting the Chassepot design to use a new brass cartridge, the 11x59R Gras, resulting in the Fusil Gras Modèle 1874. This was a singular improvement over the paper-cartridge Chassepot, and Gras rifles were used up until the Great War, at which point 140,000 or so Gras rifles were modified to use the 8mm Lebel cartridge then in front-line use.
The Gras was a very successful single-shot bolt gun, and there was even a repeating version, wherein the regular Gras rifle was fitted with an awkward, cumbersome gravity-feed hopper. That part was not successful; but the Gras saw service with many armies besides the French, including Greece, Monaco, Russia and Spain, among others.
But while all this was going on, across the Rhein in Bavaria, two brothers were looking at the success of the Gras and thinking they could go one up on the French designers. Those brothers were Paul and Wilhelm Mauser, and theirs was a name that would end up as one of the most significant in firearms history.
Back to Germany – Two Brothers Named Mauser
Back in Germany, in the little village of Oberndorf am Neckar, two brothers were getting into the gun business. Paul (given name Peter Paul, but generally referred to as Paul in documentation I’ve seen) and Wilhelm Mauser were a good team of industrialists; Paul was the engineer and designer, while Wilhelm was the businessman.
I’ve had the good fortune to have visited Oberndorf. It remains a pleasant, scenic little town along the Neckar River south by southwest of Stuttgart, home not only to the original Mauser-Werke but also to the Heckler & Koch plant – or, at least it was all those things in 1997 when I was there. It’s a typically beautiful little Bavarian village, set in a valley in the Bavarian forest; the Neckar river winds placidly through the town, and there are several wonderful gasthauses where one can enjoy a plate of schnitzel and an early-afternoon pilsner. I was lucky enough to have done so and would love to do so again.
I think the H&K works has moved, but Mauser is still there, now part of the enormous German Rheinmetall complex of factories. It’s an interesting note that the main guns used in the American M1A1 and M1A2 main battle tank is a Rheinmetall design, making that formidable 120mm smoothbore main tank gun a first cousin to the Mauser bolt guns found in armies and game fields all over.
Oberndorf was no doubt an equally pleasant place in 1870, when the brothers Mauser put the finishing touches on a single-shot bolt rifle intended for the various German militaries. Their final design became the Infanterie-Gewehr 71 (Infantry Rifle 71) and was the first commercial success for Mauser in a rifle design. Firing an 11mm (.44 caliber) black-powder cartridge, the single-shot 71 Mauser didn’t look much like the iconic Mauser rifles of later years. The action lockup was accomplished by combining a single locking lug with a bolt guide rib, and of course the piece had no magazine. The one feature the Model 71 had was the over-the-top Mauser wing safety on the bolt shroud, which would eventually become one of Mauser’s more recognizable features.
The 1871 Mauser would see several modifications and variations over the years, until it was eclipsed by later designs. But the famous name Mauser started here, with that single-shot 11mm infantry rifle. Wilhelm Mauser died in 1882 but lived to see the 71 and its variations used all over Europe, by the Ottoman Empire, Serbia, Austria, by the Irish Volunteers and in as far-flung places as China and Uruguay. His brother Paul would continue designing bolt guns, eventually coming up with the model that would set the standard for bolt rifles until… well, today.
For the best history on Mauser rifles available, I cannot recommend Ludwig Olson’s Mauser Bolt Rifles strongly enough. A copy of that work is in my permanent arms-reach desktop reference collection.
And Then This Happened
All over Europe, the various militaries were switching to single-shot bolt guns firing brass black-powder cartridges. But in Switzerland, a nation better known by most folks for discreet banking and chocolates, the Swiss Army was quietly adopting a different kind of bolt gun, one that borrowed an idea from an American design. We’ll examine the rest of Europe’s forays into bolt guns in Part Two.
But there was another big change in firearms technology on the horizon. Remember the big impact smokeless powders had on the development of sixguns and lever guns? Well, the impact on bolt guns was no less profound, and while many manufacturers were about to spring on this new technology, when it comes to bolt guns the designers at Mauser-Werke were ahead of the pack. But that’s a subject for Part Three.
Note: Meatspace issues may result in Part 2 being delayed by a week.
Super article. Part 2 will be well worth waiting for a guy that loves bolts, too. Even a left handed person has access to quality stuff, thanks to the Mauser boys. Really enjoy your history, Animal.
Hold on a minute. Did you drop this article and immediately bolt for the exit?
I know, and I’m primed for Part 2!
*narrows gaze*
Oh look, Swiss set his sights on you.
Eh . . . It’s just his stock answer.
If you are punning, he’ll come gunning.
Really, I’m just disappointed by the caliber of the puns you guys are coming up with.
I think they’re a real barrel of laughs
Wait until you see the whites of his eyes!
So, what you’re saying is that Swiss is running around half-cocked?
STEVE SMITH RUNS AROUND FULL COCKED!
You punsters have got some brass, needling Swiss like this.
It’s not our fault he’s easily triggered.
He’s aiming for a reason to muzzle you.
Swiss may bolt on a smile but he can work the action of a narrowed gaze quicker than any man.
We’ve all heard of the Iron Rules before.
Maybe Swiss’ narrowed gaze should be called the Iron Sight from now on?
Puns out, guns out.
I curse all of you!
May you all find a rat in your fondue.
Nice Shot!
We’re lucky he doesn’t close this down lock, stock, and barrel.
That’s a high caliber gaze y’all be gettin’
Wait. I’m getting a narrow gaze? Animal is the one who is in breech of contract for not delivering part 2 in a timely manner.
Hey, I’m not going to just let myself be the receiver of all this.
It’ll be okay once you extract yourself from these chambers for a while.
Swiss drops the hammer on his thousand yard stare.
Another excellent piece, Animal. I had heard the term “needle gun” before, but never knew what it really meant.
Same here. I had always thought it was some exotic evolutionary dead-end in rifle-making.
Wait until he gets to the needle bullets.
Even better is when he gets to needle dicks.
Attention whore.
At least I’m getting paid! Unlike you, you attention slut.
I swear – old brain churning away here – I’ve heard needle guns in science fiction books.
ah – a quick search found Jame Retief stories, which I used to read all of the time when I was younger.
“”The Troubleshooter”, Retief: Emissary to the Stars, December 1975. The planet Furtheron has been invaded by the omnivorous Basturans. The colonists need an army, but only get one lone diplomat and his trusty needle gun.”
Yea but in Sci Fi I don’t think it means the same thing. Historically the term needle gun seems to be referring to the mechanism used to ignite the primer (a needle to penetrate the paper case rather than a pin to strike it). In sci fi the term needle gun generally refers to a weapon which fires a barrage of high velocity slivers or flechettes and usually either uses a pneumatic or electromagnetic systems to fire the ammo down the barrell
I sure hope they don’t mean the same thing – I was just talking generally about hearing the term before; not necessarily the technology.
Needle gun was used in Asimov’s books adn also Needler is in Halo video game and Harrision’s stainless Steel Rat.
7) The Needler (The Stainless Steel Rat and Halo)
Halo may have made the Needler gun famous, but Harry Harrison’s hero, the Stainless Steel Rat, was shooting them first. In the Harrison books, the Needler gun could shoot all sorts of different needles, including paralyzing needles, truth serum, nerve toxins and so on. In Halo, the Needler shoots needles that track your opponents, and it can shoot at a very fast rate. If you embed seven needles in a player in the same area, they explode and kill the player. Image via Kotaku.
I’m loving the history lessons.
*thumbs up*
It remains a pleasant, scenic little town along the Neckar River south by southwest of Stuttgart, home not only to the original Mauser-Werke but also to the Heckler & Koch plant – or, at least it was all those things in 1997 when I was there. It’s a typically beautiful little Bavarian village, set in a valley in the Bavarian forest
NEIN! Oberndorf am Neckar is Swabian (Swabisch auf Deutsch). It is near the Black Forest, which is not Bavarian at all.
Otherwise, I really liked this piece.
I’ve seen Dreyse Needle Guns in museums, but never outside of a museum. The earliest bolt action gun I’ve handled was a Berdan II. It was available for sale a few auctions ago at the Amoskeag Auction. It was in the live auction viewing room, so I took a close look at it. I didn’t bid on it. It went for a few thousand dollars if I remember correctly.
Bloke on the Range has some videos on the Chassepot. Youtube briefly banned his channel over a video about reloading for the Chassepot.
Let me guess, the next installment covers Schmidt and Rubin? I like my Schmidt-Rubins, and Rubin had a big influence on gun design.
I have Olsen’s Mauser book, but I recently found a mistake in it. I recently won an auction for a Columbian Mauser. As a side note, I mailed payment for the Mauser today. When I was researching the Mauser, I noted Olsen’s book says DWM had the contract which produced this rifle, but that’s not correct. Steyr had it. Ball’s book is pretty good, but the latest edition has poor quality pictures. When I look at Mauser auctions, I keep Ball’s book handy because it has better pictures to help with identification than Olsen’s book.
As I understand it, Swabia, Upper and Lower Bavaria, Upper Palatinate and Upper, Middle and Lower Franconia are all part of Bavaria. Am I getting that wrong? Wikipedia’s article on Bavaria states in part:
Franconia is only part of Bavaria because of the Napoleonic Wars if I remember correctly. There is a movement in Franconia to become independent of Bavaria as there are people in Franconia who were never happy about being part of Bavaria.
I think the Wiki article is referring to those parts of Swabia which are in Bavaria and near the modern Bavaria/Baden-Württemburg state line. The current line runs through the historic region of Swabia. Oberndorf am Neckar and Stuttgart are in western portion of Swabia, which is currently in Baden-Württemburg.
Hrm. I must have had Bavaria on the brain. I was stationed in Heidelberg when I was over there, which is in Baden-Württemburg, and spent a lot of my free time mooching around Bavaria.
Heidelberg isn’t too far from the Franconia region of Bavaria. It’s probably an easy trip.
I’ve wanted to visit Heidelberg but haven’t yet. I’ve spent most of my time in Germany in Bavaria around Munich and in the Rhine-Ruhr area around Cologne.
This. The current federal boundaries in Germany are only a very loose approximation of the historical regions – with the noted addition of Bavaria’s being a result of a post-war land exchange. (It used to extend into much of what is now Austria.)
I lived in Franconia when I was in Germany – they have their own dialect distinct from Bairisch which reflects that history.
American visiting Germany after spending 15mins crossing Lower lesser Swabia: “What is this place?”
German: “Upper lesser Swabia”
German visiting America, after driving for two days: “What is this place?” *eyes horizon in every direction for 100 miles*
American: “Texas”
I once helped an old German couple with directions on how to drive to New Orleans. From Orlando. They were not pleased when they were informed of the distance.
I’m re-reading what I wrote and I thought to myself, “I should proofread before I post.”
I also wonder how long before someone makes a joke that “Columbian Mauser” is an odd way to spell “Lee-Enfield”.
I think the Swiss foreshadowing is the Vetterli with box magazine rather than Schmidt or Rubin.
Though no history of the bolt gun would be complete without them, so it’s a moot point.
Oh right, the Vetterli. Back when I first started buying old guns, I considered getting one but passed on it.
Been there. I’d love an old Swiss Vetterli, but I still haven’t gotten into reloading, which I would need to do.
There used to be a guy in Switzerland selling Swiss rifles with pre-1899 receivers (antique under US Federal law). I bought my Schmidt-Rubin M1889 from him. He was the one I was thinking of buying a Vetterli from. I don’t know if he is still around selling antique guns.
The Schmidt-Rubin came via Swiss Post to the US Postal Service. I wasn’t home when the Postal Service tried delivering, so they left one of those “We have a package for you, come claim it” cards in my mailbox. I went over to the post office to pick up my rifle. The clerk asked what was in the box, “Switzerland? Is that golf clubs or skis?”
I wasn’t going to take a chance on the guy knowing when it is legal to ship arms through the postal service, so I said, “Golf clubs”, and then bugged out of there quickly with my rifle.
I don’t reload, but I have some ammunition for my 1889. Someone here on glibs, it might have been Animal but I can’t remember, suggested these people. They have loads for the 1889, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they have loads for the Vetterlis as well. I also had them make some ammunition for my Lee-Metford Mk II. You need to slug your bore and give them the measurement. They were easy to deal with. Whoever it was that suggested them to me, thanks!
For various reasons of my own and thanks to some recent problems with the berms at my gun club, I haven’t shot the 1889 or the Lee-Metford yet.
I wasn’t going to take a chance on the guy knowing when it is legal to ship arms through the postal service, so I said, “Golf clubs”, and then bugged out of there quickly with my rifle.
“Why, yes, it is a long metal device for launching things long distances.”
The clerk asked what was in the box, “Switzerland? Is that golf clubs or skis?”
I wasn’t going to take a chance on the guy knowing when it is legal to ship arms through the postal service, so I said, “Golf clubs”
Reminds me of the time that my buddy came to visit me in Dallas to go dove hunting. The baggage claim attendant came on the intercom and said “If you’re coming off the flight and you had checked a *ahem* BASS… GUITAR *ahem*, come see me at the counter.”
My buddy went up there to collect his shotgun and said with a knowing smile “you know as well as I do that there’s no bass guitar in there”. The attendant wittily responded “you know that. I know that. But they don’t know that.”
And then he spent the rest of the weekend shooting her with his love gun?
And this is why I ship live yeast samples through the mail instead of beer.
Speaking of… the BIF article should be posting at some point to allow sign ups for the Spring round. Sorry it’s running a bit late, but it still doesn’t feel like spring here (35 F this morning when I left for work).
shooting her with his love gun?
Well, my buddy is married, but the attendant seemed like he might be receptive go that idea.
The Swiss Vetterli rifles don’t have a box magazine. They have a tube magazine.
The Italian Vetterli rifles had a fixed box magazine.
That’s right, it was the Italians who decided they didn’t want to deal with loading a tube magazine.
As usual, this is really good stuff. Thanks.
An acquaintance who has an impressive collection of historic infantry rifles has an 1866 Chassepot. Interesting to learn something about the history behind it. Thanks, Animal!
So you are saying that bolt-actions are literal weapons of war.
I love bolt guns. The accuracy, the classic wooden stocks, and there’s something so satisfying about manually working the action (not a euphemism… unless you want it to be I guess).
My first owned bolt action was a sporterized Springfield 03. A lot of things wrong with it, but cycling that action was a joy to perform, watch, and hear.
True story: In the mid-Nineties I was bumming around a small local gun show in Lakewood (we used to have those) and ended up talking to a guy who had a sporterized Springfield 03 for sale. It was reasonably nicely turned out, with a decent light walnut stock, low-swing safety and a Redfield scope mount. They guy was asking $250 for it, which even then seemed pretty cheap.
When I asked why, he replied, “it’s that damn left-handed stock on it. Nobody wants it.” Sure enough, the stock had a cheekpiece on the wrong side.
Well, I dickered with him a while and ended up buying that 03 for $175. I took it home, took the stock off, took a big cabinet rasp and removed the cheeckpiece. I did some shaping with smaller rasps, sanded it all smooth and applied linseed oil.
I shot that rifle some, even took it out one year and bagged a mulie and a pronghorn with it. I sold it for $350.
A few years later another sporterized Springfield crossed my path, this one with a refinished stock stained dark walnut. The stock was broken at the wrist and repaired with epoxy and wire. I bought it for $200, figuring I’d make a new stock for it and turn it around.
I got it home, got it in the shop and starting noting particulars for my records. When I noted the serial number…
…sure as hell, it was the same rifle. I put a new stock on it and sold it again, this time for $400-some.
That’s pretty good.
The first rifle I bought was a Schmidt-Rubin K31. It’s a good rifle.
I have a Springfield 03 and a 03A3 that I bought through the CMP. Both are good guns.
OT: something something get the government they want good and hard
https://www.redstate.com/diary/kentucky_dana/2019/04/29/isnt-left-wanted/
“Elections have consequences, someone once said, and now the consequences of all of those elections in which Californians put leftist Democrats in office are hitting them in the wallet. They asked for it, they got it, and now they don’t like it.”
Speaking of (natural!) gas… I wonder who stands to gain from the higher prices pushed by the likes of Hillary.
“I wanted everyone to have health care so I supported Obamacare. I just didn’t know I was going to have to pay for it”
-Actual Californian progressive being interviewed after Obamacare went into effect and complaints about skyrocketing premiums and deductibles were in the news.
Fuck those idiots. And they better not come to my state and start that shit here.
To be fair . . Obama spent so much time trying to tank the economy that he probably didn’t expect her to have a job to be able to pay
He;s gone so Japanese he spells his own name wrong…
Fascinating. Thanks again for these, Animal!
Another great article, Animal!
Thanks Animal. These articles are fantastic and I’m excited for the next chapter.
Awesome stuff! And Lebel hype next week!
Looking at the paper cartridge, in hindsight its easy to see how it is a temporary/intermediate step on the way to the metal cartridges we all know and love so very, very much. Previously, paper wadding was used in muzzleloaders, and premeasured (in paper) powder was used sometimes as well, with the empty paper being used for wadding. The premeasured was basically, as far as I can tell, pretty much the paper cartridge only without the bullet.
There were also premeasured loads for cannons, which I think continued for quite some time (and maybe even to the present day for big naval cannons, which I believe used silk powder bags). You had to poke the bag with the powder open through the touch-hole, so that when you stuck the smoldering taper or punk through (or pulled the flintlock ingniter) it would light the powder.
Easy enough to see an E-Z evolution to putting the ball in with the powder (which was probably done with the premeasured muzzleloader loads anyway), with the innovation being putting the percussion cap in there, too. And the next step, assembling the whole mess into a much sturdier metal cartridge.
And the evolution from blackpowder muzzle-loaders to repeating metal cartridge rifles happened in, what, fifty years? Imagine if a similar advance in firearms technology had happened in the last fifty years, since 1980. I wonder what we would be shooting today?
Pulse-plasma rifle with a 40-Watt range?
Indeed. I’m waiting patiently for Hayeksplosives fine work to be reduced in size, first to crew-served, then to man-portable, then to handgun size. Hey, a boy can dream.