When Gunpowder Went Smokeless
Germany Makes a Move
We’ve got a lot of ground to cover and not much bandwidth, and this will be an image-heavy post to support that. So hang on.
While the French were developing the Lebel, Europe’s first military smokeless powder repeater in mass production, the Germans weren’t hiding behind the door.
In response to France’s adoption of the Lebel rifle, the Germans did something that almost never happens – they formed a government commission that successfully designed a cutting-edge infantry rifle.
The 1888 Commission rifle had a five-round magazine and a bolt with two locking lugs at the front of the bolt body. While the 1888 is frequently referred to as the 1888 Mauser, this is incorrect, as Mauser had no hand in the design of this weapon and, in fact, made few if any of the almost three million Commission rifles; most were made by the Ludwig Loewe works (later renamed the Deutsch Waffen und Munition-Fabriken, or DWM) by the Steyr works in Austria and by Imperial arsenals at Amberg, Danzig, Erfurt and Spandau.
The 1888 Commission rifle was only in primary German service for ten years, but it did have one outstanding characteristic: Its cartridge. The 1888 Commission rifle introduced the 7.92x57mm (generally known as the 8×57 Mauser) cartridge, in its original Patrone 88 J-bore configuration, firing a .318 diameter, 227-grain round-nose slug at about 2400 fps.
The 7.92x57mm cartridge would effectively father an incredible variety of rifle cartridges. Such legends of riflery as the great .30-06 Springfield, the .308 Winchester and the .270 Winchester share its case head, which has become damn near standard for medium-power bolt gun rounds. Unlike the rimmed Lebel case, the 7.92x57mm was rimless, using an extraction groove in the case to remove fired cases from the chamber; this made it easier to feed rounds from a magazine quickly, smoothly and efficiently.
Down in Oberndorf, Paul Mauser was, to put it mildly, displeased at the German government’s bypassing his design people to build their own infantry rifle. Mauser-Werke was at the time still churning out the 71/84 rifle, but Paul Mauser had some ideas, and if the German government didn’t want an improved Mauser, there were other governments in Europe and elsewhere that would.
The Run Up to The Final Mauser
Mauser’s late-nineteenth century battle rifles went through three main phases, each marked by several technological innovations. Those phases included:
- The 1889 Belgian, 1890 Turkish and 1891 Argentine Mausers
- The various 1893-1895 small-ring Mausers, which include the 1894 and 1896 Swedish Mausers
- The 1898 Mauser
So, let’s look at each in turn.
By today’s standards, the 1889/90/91 rifles looked a little odd, at least if you’re used to more modern Mauser-type actions. Missing was the big claw extractor. The magazine was a protruding single-stack affair, loading five of the new 7.65x53mm Argentine cartridge, a fast, powerful round for the time. But these rifles did retain the 71/84’s over the top safety and the bolt locked securely into the receiver ring by the expedient of two large opposed locking lugs at the front of the bolt.
Some years ago, I picked up an 1891 Argentine that had been rebarreled with a 7x57mm tube and had a Redfield peep mounted on the receiver. I put on a nice blonde walnut stock with a narrow Schnabel fore-end; I re-blued the action and refinished the wood, had the bolt body jeweled and a butterknife bolt handle installed. It was a beautiful rifle, handy and light; I fed it mild handloads and killed a few deer and a couple of javelina with it.
The Belgian Army used their 1889 model in the Great War; the Ottoman Turks still had some by that fateful day in 1914. All in all, a little over a quarter-million of these rifles were made.
Following close on the heels of the Belgian/Turk/Argentine rifles came a new design, which entered the market with what became known as the 93/95 action. This was a more modern-looking piece, retaining the safety but exchanging the single-stack magazine for a flush-fitting staggered-stack magazine, and introducing the characteristic claw extractor. Previous Mausers were, like many modern bolt guns, push-feed operated; the bolt simply stripped a round from the magazine and pushed it into the chamber. The new Mausers big claw extractor engaged the extraction groove on the cartridge and guided it into the chamber directly, making for what most bolt gun mavens consider a more reliable feed; the down side of this system is that one cannot simply drop a round in the action and close the bolt. Loading a single round requires the shooter to place the round into the magazine so the bolt can engage it as designed.
Most of the new Mausers were chambered for the new 7x57mm rimless cartridge, a low-recoil, high-velocity round that would prove popular in martial circles and, later, in the game fields. In fact, of all the Mauser cartridges, the 7x57mm alone remains popular among American shooters to this day. The first models turned out by Mauser went to Spain, and these rifles still are often referred to generically as “Spanish Mausers.” But many of these guns were made and sold all over, seeing service with the armies of Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Congo, the Ottoman Empire and Serbia.
In Sweden, the Carl Gustaf works turned out what may be the finest of the pre-98 rifles in the M94 and M96 Swedish Mausers, chambered for the excellent 6.5x55mm Swede cartridge. Many Swedes have been imported into the States, and as they are easily converted into lightweight sporters, make excellent rifles for deer-sized game.
In 1898, though, Paul Mauser produced his finest work.
The 1898 (or, simply the 98) was the culmination of Mauser’s design work. Most bolt-action sporters today are adaptations of the 98 Mauser. This new action had a larger receiver ring with a stout reinforcing web, a solid bolt with the usual two big locking lugs but also a third safety lug at the rear; the bolt shroud was larger and had a large flange to direct hot gases away from the shooter in the event of a case rupture.
There was one other major innovation. Prior to the 98, Mauser actions combined the initial lift of the bolt handle with a slight camming action to initiate the extraction of a fired round. When closing the bolt, the shooter was required to push the bolt home against the mainspring, thus cocking the piece.
The 98 changed that, using the camming action of the bolt to cock the striker on opening, rather than closing. This made operation of the action faster, more secure, and allowed the force of the run forward to be devoted to chambering the next round.
It was with this action and the Gewehr 98 rifle built around it that Paul Mauser finally regained the attention of the German Army. Germany entered the Great War fielding this long, heavy, powerful rifle and its 7.92x57mm S-bore (.323) cartridge; over 9 million Gewehr 98s were made, many millions more rifles were built around the basic M98 action, and the 98 Mauser action would become the basis for martial and sporting rifles all over the world. I have in the past mentioned my favorite hunting rifle, built on a 98 Mauser action made by DWM in Berlin around 1911 on contract for Brazil; if you own a Winchester Model 70 or a Remington 700, you are shooting a rifle closely modeled after the 98 Mauser.
Mauser produced a wonder, but across the English Channel, the Brits were developing a gun that may well have surpassed it as a pure battle rifle.
Meanwhile, in Britain
In 1879, the British Army was looking to replace their single-shot black-powder Martini-Henry rifles with something more modern. Enter a sporting chap named James Paris Lee. Lee had developed a practical box magazine that allowed a shooter to load multiple rounds with a new device called a stripper clip, or to simply stuff single rounds into the magazine.
Working with another inventor named William Ellis Medford, the two came up with a bolt-action repeater with an eight-round (later ten round) magazine, locking lugs on the rear of the bolt, and a cock-on-closing mechanism similar to the pre-98 Mausers, the thinking in Blighty being that the cock-on-close action was quicker to operate.
My personal experience is just the opposite, but I’m just one guy, after all.
While Lee-Enfield’s the short bolt throw (60 degrees compared to the Mauser’s 90) was probably as much to do with that quick operation as the action, nevertheless the new rifle proved acceptable and in 1888, after nine years of tests, the British Army adopted the Lee-Metford magazine rifle and its .303 rimmed cartridge.
Important note: In the last issue I incorrectly identified the Italian Vetterli as the first mass-produced bolt gun with a box magazine; as a sharp-eyed reader noted, the Lee-Metford preceded it.
The Lee-Metford rifle would, however, only stay in primary service until 1895, when a modified version was adopted. This was the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield (SMLE) rifle, a ten-shot magazine-fed adaptation of the Lee-Metford built at the Royal Small Arms Factory in Enfield.
The Lee-Enfield would prove successful indeed as a battle rifle. Its ten-round capacity was double that of most magazine rifles of the time. Like its competitors it would be loaded by stripper clip or with single rounds; unlike them, the magazine could be removed from the rifle and replaced with a loaded one, although this practice was not encouraged at the time due to fears that the common soldiery would simply lose the detached magazines.
Over seventeen million Lee-Enfield rifles would be manufactured in several variations.
But about this time, across the Atlantic, the United States Army was finally thinking of moving past single-shot black-powder breechloaders, and another Lee design would be part of that calculation.
The Americans Upgrade
In 1894, the same year the immortal Winchester Repeating Arms Company brought out the immortal 1894 lever gun, the U.S. military was looking around for a smokeless-powder repeater to replace their single-shot black-powder Springfields. The Navy chose to adopt a semi-rimmed 6mm cartridge, and the Navy Test Board invited manufacturers to submit repeaters for their testing at the Naval Torpedo Station.
After screening a mess of rifles, including no less than five Remington bolt-action prototypes, the Navy settled on a straight-pull bolt gun designed by no less than James Paris Lee.
The M1895 Lee Navy rifle had a fixed box magazine that was loaded with a five-round en bloc clip, which had the advantage of speedy reloads but the disadvantage of not being able to top off the magazine with single rounds. Nevertheless, the Lee was an interesting design and, in 1895, the choice of the small-bore cartridge was unprecedented.
That cartridge design survives today, incidentally, necked down to .22 caliber, as the .220 Swift.
The Lee Navy rifle only ended up in front-line service for three years, though, as in 1898 a board of Army, Navy and Marine officers determined a standard rifle was in order.
The story of the first inter-service standard turn-bolt repeater begins in Norway with a gun designer named Ole Herman Johannes Krag and a gunsmith named Erik Jørgensen. Krag had been in the small-arms business since 1866 and was unsatisfied with the tubular magazines in military rifles of the time; he sought out Jørgensen to design something new. What they came up with was a solid bolt gun with a 5-round magazine that loaded through a loading gate on the right-hand side of the rifle. This novel loading system had two big advantages; it allowed for topping up the magazine with single loads, and allowed for fast reloads as loose rounds could be dumped into the open magazine gate and, when the spring-loaded gate was closed, the rounds would automatically be aligned for proper feeding.
Denmark had adopted what became the Krag-Jørgensen repeater in 1889. In 1892, after a competition among 53 rifle designs, the U.S. Army, Navy and Marines adopted what would be called the M1892 Krag rifle, firing the .30 Government cartridge, later known as the .30-40 Krag.
The Krag was a good, solid reliable rifle. About half a million were manufactured by the Springfield Armory between 1892 and 1907. Krag repeaters saw service in the Spanish-American war, the Philippine Insurrection, the Boxer Rebellion and the Mexican Revolution, and as a reserve weapon in the Great War. But during the Spanish-American War, the Krag performed poorly against Spanish troops armed with 1893 Mausers and their 7x57mm cartridge. The Army determined that a more modern rifle was in order.
Thousands of Spanish Mausers were surrendered by Spanish soldiers in Cuba. Many of those found their way to Massachusetts, where Springfield Armory gunsmiths examined that design and came up with an American counterpart. Features of the 93 and 98 Mauser patterns were combined along with some American requirements, like a knurled cocking knob on the striker rear and a magazine cut-off. A new, powerful rimless cartridge was designed that fired a 220-grain round-nose jacketed bullet at about 2200 fps, but after three years and a distinct lack of zap, the original .30-03 round was replaced by a new round with a slightly shorter-necked round firing a 150-grain spitzer bullet at about 2800 fps. Now the combination of rifle and cartridge was complete: The M1903 Springfield and the Ball Cartridge, Caliber .30, Model of 1906, or simply the .30-06, which remains today one of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in the world; it has been claimed that more North American big game has been killed with .30-06 rounds than by all other centerfire rifle cartridges combined and while I have never seen numbers to support that, I don’t find it outside the realm of possibility.
This rifle would be the primary weapon of the U.S. Army and Marines when the U.S. entered the Great War in 1917.
In Russia
The story of bolt-action repeaters in Russia is the story of the Mosin-Nagant.
Russian troops were armed with the Berdan single-shot rifle when they went off to fight the Ottoman Turks in the Russo-Ottoman War of 1877. Unfortunately for them, the Turks were equipped with Winchester repeaters. Although Russia eventually won that conflict, the Russian troops fared poorly in direct action against the fast-firing Turks, and this was enough to make even Russian military planners realize a change was in order.
In 1889, the Russian Army evaluated three rifles: Captain Sergei Ivanovich Mosin’s “3-line” (.30 caliber) rifle, Belgian Leon Nagant’s “3.5-line” (.35 caliber, more or less) rifle and third design by one Captain Zinoviev. Trials continued until 1891, when the officers in charge of the evaluation commission decided to combine the best features of the first two rifles, resulting in the M1891 Mosin-Nagant rifle.
The Mosin-Nagant was certainly a robust piece, even if most examples I have seen lacked the fit and polish of German, British and American-made rifles of the time. The M1891 used two big opposed front locking lugs like the 98 Mauser, a fixed single-stack magazine like the 89/91 Mausers and a push-feed system.
Like the Kalashnikov rifles that succeeded it, the Mosin-Nagant was stoutly built, made to withstand slapdash maintenance and hard use by poorly educated peasant soldiers. Its 7.65x53R cartridge was on a par with the German, British and American rounds, and the Russian rifle, however rough in design, certainly stood the test of time. Like the AK, it was service all over the world; also, like the AK, it is impossible to know precisely how many Mosin-Nagant variants have been built, but the number probably approaches forty million.
And Then This Happened
There is a saying among bolt gun aficionados that among Great War battle rifles, “the Mauser is the best hunting rifle, the Springfield the best target rifle, and the Lee-Enfield the best battle rifle.” (The Mosin-Nagant, on the other hand, made the best tent pole.) The Great War provided us with plenty of evidence of how these three guns worked in action, but truisms aside, the impact of these pieces would go well beyond the war.
With the breakout of the Great War, the Allied powers and the Triple Alliance were all equipped with bolt guns. While the European powers went into the fray well-equipped, the British found themselves struggling to produce enough Lee-Enfield rifles for their troops.
Enter that industrial powerhouse across the Atlantic. Great Britain’s estranged offspring, the United States, was about to bail out the Brits (not for the last time) by producing a new bolt rifle for the .303 British round – and later, in 1917, another version of that same rifle to supplement the standard-issue Springfield. The result of that was almost five million American doughboys who became accustomed to shooting bolt guns at the detested Hun, and an American firearms industry that was suddenly proficient at building bolt guns. More on this in Part Four.
This trend would continue through the inter-war years. While the American bolt gun trend started with service rifles, the various gun companies here would quickly bring out their own bolt-action sporters, and competition among the companies resulted in a great variety of rifles available for sale. We’ve already examined the career of the prescient Charles Newton in a separate work, but Newton had plenty of competition.
Americans then and now love them some guns. Plenty of shooters then and now like to be in on the latest big thing, and after the Great War and on into the rest of the 20th century, bolt-action sporters were the New Hotness. Not to be left out, European manufacturers weren’t about to miss this growing market either. But that’s a story for Part Five.
Really interesting read today, Animal.
You may have touched on this and I missed it, but was there ever accommodation made for left-handed shooters?
Not in military rifles. Several civilian manufacturers started offering left-handed guns, as I recall, beginning in the Sixties.
Thank you.
The Swiss came up with an attachment for their Schmidt-Rubins to allow ease of use for lefties. I don’t know if it was something civilian target shooters came up with or if the Swiss military developed it. I’ve seen pictures of them in use but never seen one in the flesh.
I got my left hander in about ’69, Mark V Weatherby
As always – good work and I love the history.
When I was a lad, a friend had a Lee-Enfield .303 with the muzzle bell – the trench warfare model. Damn, that thing would kick. Good memories. Thanks.
Sounds more like the WW2 jungle carbine. Real ones go for big bucks now.
There were accessories for the SMLE for grenade launching that look like a bell or cup.
Tonio, did it look like the gun pictured here?
I think the price for No. 5 rifles has gone down relative to No. 4 and SMLE Mk III/No. 1 Mk III rifles, at least based on what I’ve seen on GunBroker.
There are lots of fakes out there. I’ve seen guys try to pass a cut down No. 4 off as a No. 5. The lightening cuts are hard to fake and get right, and if you can get the seller to take the gun apart, there are more underneath the wood and on the barrel knox.
Another enjoyable installment, Animal.
Let’s have some more love for those Mosins!
https://www.amazon.com/photos/shared/nuCuunSiSKWNClUalnOs3Q.BBbI-4UWLX4tKkjZHMSQF4
I didn’t feel like dragging out my hex 91/30 last night. But this one above is a peach, and is marked 1948.
My brother in law has a Mosin. That thing will bruise a shoulder with the best of them.
In my collection:
Soviet:
91/30
Some Commie country (probably converted in Czechoslovakia but who knows who used them):
91/38
Finnish:
1891 from Chatellerault
M28
M39 with straight stock
M39 with standard pistol grip stock.
I’ve only shot the 91/30 but plan to change that over the summer. No pictures since I’m at the office (shh… I shouldn’t be posting here at all…)
All Finnish Mosins in my collection use pre-1899 receivers, so no background checks on any of them.
Nice!
My dad had an authentic German Mauser that my grandfather brought back from the war. Then it got stolen. I haz sadz.
“stolen”? or stolen-stolen?
This was an especially enjoyable one for me as I’ve got a Gewehr 88, a Strine SMLE mk III, and a Mosin-Nagant. I haven’t shot the Mosin yet, but I do like the plethora of memes comparing AR 15s, AK 47s, and Mosin-Nagant, typically making reference to the shockwave of a round knocking down all the targets adjacent to yours or something like that.
I’ve had a couple of Gewehr 98s, one K98k and a rather rare WW1 small-ring kar98 complete with bayonet, and regrettably (maybe stupidly) ended up selling or trading them all away in one deal or another. And yes, I shot them all.
Was just looking over a couple of old Smellies at a gun show in Philly last Saturday. One of these days I’ll pick one up to mess with for a while, although the days when they went cheap are done past.
I’d love to get a Kar 98, although since I’m in Maryland I couldn’t get the bayonet. I’m also really interested in picking up a Garand to round out the collection. I’m torn between doing the Civilian Marksmanship Program to try and snag one on the cheap and just getting one through Gun Broker or somewhere. Obviously I’d love one that’s in very good condition with all original parts but I can’t afford the price, likely. I’d be very happy with a good condition with a replacement stock if I can get it for a reasonable price.
Thanks for the history lesson!
Always great reading, Mr Animal. Now I’m waiting for your next installment.
More collusion between Gun Jesus & Animal. Yesterday’s video is a book review of the Dreyse, the predecessor twice removed of the 1888 Commission rifle.
Great article Animal!
When I was a kid (about 10 or 11) my best friend (same age) got a “sporterized” Mauser for Christmas, I don’t know what vintage (WWI, II, ??) it was, but it was still chambered for 8X57, just called 8 mm Mauser I think. I’m pretty sure his parents bought it from a Sears & Roebuck catalogue for about $25, around 1967-ish. The barrel had been shortened and a new wooden stock was installed, but the action was a standard 98. He shot his first deer with it, I was jealous.
My first deer rifle was a sporterized M95 in 7×57. After it was stolen I borrowed my Dad’s Carl Gustave M94 in 6.5×55. We named it “Deerslayer”. It, and Dad’s M95, currently reside in my gun safe. Dad probably converted two dozen guns many of them, like my first, were bought for Herters or Sears. He was quite a craftsman and his guns are works of art.
A special thanks for this article, Animal. It’s like you are talking about all the girls that I fell in love with in high school.
Found my picture of the Gustave here. It’s the one in the center. Forgot to mention that it’s a carbine and has a muzzle-blast that’s been described as “impressive.” One of Dad’s custom stocks, this one a mannlicher.
I do like that stock.
Seconded.
A good friend of mine has a sporterized 1903 that he picked up for $200. Lucky bastid.
Give him an ice pack.
Taxpayers gave me a Springfield to carry around in 1956. Heckuva gun but I had to give it back 8 weeks later
For those of you in Virginia – Just got a gun auction notice from a range going out of business
https://rasmus-auctions.appspot.com/auctions/SX35j8t3ObOGvffqz47i
Good article Animal, thank you.
Nice! I wish I had the cash to buy something.
I’m guessing they won’t ship?
they may. they filed Chapter 11 so it’s a reorg. they’re liquidating inventory from the one store they closed.
You’ll probably need a local FFL or be a FFL holder yourself in order to receive any shipments.
I imagine the state makes it hard to run a gun range in Virginia.
It’s more of a local ordinance issue. Here in rural VA, a range would have no legal problems operating. Though they may trouble finding paying customers as there’s plenty of land to shoot on. I have my own range on my property. Many of my neighbors do too… at least I’m guessing so from the sound.
Urban areas are a different story. Many are trying to drive out their ranges with zone changes and targeted codes. Prince William County is a good example.
If they end up closing down Elite, both KK and I will be pissed.
mostly plastastic Glocks, S&W. a few others sprinkled in for variety.
I’ll be watching the revolvers myself.
That was my take. I’m starting to rethink my decision not to have a revolver as a carry gun.
those Rugers have smooth triggers.
OT: I’m skeptical.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/779048/What-women-really-want-in-bed-sex-worker-male-escort-Australia
In Sweden, the Carl Gustaf works turned out what may be the finest of the pre-98 rifles in the M94 and M96 Swedish Mausers, chambered for the excellent 6.5x55mm Swede cartridge. Many Swedes have been imported into the States, and as they are easily converted into lightweight sporters, make excellent rifles for deer-sized game.
These are excellent rifles. I have a m96, and a m38 from Husqvarna. Mauser Oberndorf made some around 1900 under contract to the Swedes. I’ve seen a few and I think the Swede made ones look better made. I’ve never fired a Mauser Oberndorf made m96.
I gotta point out mistakes again:
The original Lee action did not load from stripper clips. They hadn’t been invented yet. If I remember correctly Paul Mauser invented the stripper clip around 1890. Original Lee rifles, except for the en-bloc using version which the US Navy adopted, were loaded singly.
The SMLE came around in 1904. Between the end of Lee-Metford production and the beginning of SMLE production Britain used the “Rifle, Magazine, Lee-Enfield” or MLE or “Long Lee Enfield”. The only differences between the first MLE and the last Lee-Metford were the barrel and sights.
The first SMLE, the SMLE Mk I, had a sliding guide for stripper clip loading. This turned out to be unreliable. The SMLE Mk III came about in 1907 and had a solid charger bridge.
Some Lee-Metfords and Long Lee Enfields were converted to the SMLE pattern, both SMLE Mk I and SMLE Mk III patterns (SMLE Mk II Cond. and SMLE Mk IV Cond. respectively regardless of the original rifle type).
After 1907, Some Lee-Metfords and MLEs were converted to use stripper clips but remained as long rifles. Lee-Metfords so converted were redesignated “Charger Loading Lee-Metford” (CLLM). MLEs converted were redesignated “Charger Loading Lee-Enfield” (CLLE). I don’t know why the British kept some as long rifles but converted some to short rifles. Also, a CLLM is quite a rare find.
As a side note, British rifle nomenclature up until the 20s is a pain in the ass.
I agree with you about the short bolt throw having more to do with the speed of the Lee-Enfield. Another thing is the Lee-Enfield bolt handle brings your hand, when you close the bolt, right over the trigger. You could work the trigger with your middle finger while keeping your thumb and index finger on the bolt handle. There are videos out there of people demonstrating that technique. I’ve never done it myself.
I also don’t think cock on close has anything to do with the speed.
I notice very little difference between cock on open and cock on close unless I work the bolt gingerly. If I work it vigorously, I notice no difference at all.
One thing I found amusing about the Krag rifle development is that the Norwegians were the last to adopt the rifle developed there. I read somewhere that the US Army actually looked at Mausers at the same time they considered the Krag, but went with the Krag because they wanted a magazine cut-off, which all Mausers dropped by that point.
Mosin-Nagants are solid rifles. American made ones (Remington and New England Westinghouse made some under contract for the Russians as the Russians had the same problems as the British) and Finnish Mosins tend to be well put-together.
Thanks Animal! Nice article!
I can’t speak to the Krag’s shortcomings as an infantry rifle, but they’re a pleasure to shoot. That action is silky smooth.
I’ve wanted one, and every time I bid on one at auction, I get outbid.
Auction strategy can be complex and nuanced, but I think you should look at placing higher bids.
That’s the obvious answer isn’t it?
Me too. An acquaintance owns one and let me try it out once.
I have a 6.5mm Japanese Type 38 Arisaka. My Father-in-law acquired it during his service right after WWII. It was not surrendered as the Imperial Chrysanthemum was not scratched off. There is a gouge in the stock that could have been made by a .30-06 going the wrong way for the previous owner.
When I inherited it, the firing pin had been broken – I assume intentionally. I bought a replacement and some ammo. It fires well enough but it zeroed for probably 300 yards so not much fun to shoot at 100. And the ammo well over a $1 a shot so it does’t get much range time. It’s absurdly long and heavy for a 6.5mm rifle used in the jungle. Maybe it made sense in far eastern Russia and the plains of Manchuria.
Imperial Chrysanthemum was not scratched off
that’s really cool.
Yes. Most were ground off.
The pic on the Wiki article shows one that is scratched out.
My FIL had one of those. It was going to be auctioned off with the rest of his personal effects, and I had my eye on it, but it mysteriously disappeared before the auction. I’m pretty sure I know which of my brother-in-laws made off with it.
I doubt it was a battlefield acquisition, as FIL was mainly a door gunner on, I believe, Mitchells flying shipping interdiction.
If I heard correctly, a lot of grunts in WWII would happily trade Japanese rifles and other items taken from battlefields to rear echelon troops for chow or cigs. I expect that those got traded around for other things so your FIL’s rifle most probably came off a battlefield before changing hands and ending up in his possession.
OT
what the fuck Switzerland?
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/05/luis-valdes/switzerland-votes-to-impose-eu-style-gun-control-laws/
The true story is that there is no exceptions and that the new law turns the right to own semi-automatic firearms a privilege linked to an activity (sport, collection, etc).
All semi-automatic handguns holding more than 20 rounds and rifles holding more than 10 rounds will go into the restricted category, which will now only be accessible with government approval.
i did not see this coming.
All firearms once legally owned will now need to be declared and added to the EU-wide registry. Assuming full compliance (a big if) that means every Swiss gun owner will be known to all EU law enforcement agencies, with a list of who owns what firearms.
This law is supposed to be tightened by parliamentary vote in two years and then every five years afterwards if there is no sign that it has stopped terrorism or criminal acts. And since this will do nothing against terrorism, and terrorism will still happen, it will be tightened.
Shocking and disappointing.
64 percent too…pafuckingthetic.
Yeah, this is a dark day.
I find it disturbing that they are trading a part of their legacy for political fashion.
I inherited a BSA Lee Speed, the civilian hunting version of the MLE, and made up through the ’20s at least. Full-length sight rib, shotgun style safety (as colonial managers were more familiar with this type, being genteel and shit) rose and scroll engraving and a platinum sight bead. I have other guns, but nothing is such a pleasure to look at or shoot. Mine is in .303 but they came in a variety of period calibers, all rimmed.
https://www.americanrifleman.org/media/2705975/sporting.jpg
A proper shit-lords rifle.
They are nice rifles.
Some Lee-Speeds were made to match the military pattern but made with higher quality. Officers were required to provide their own equipment, and why would an officer want a rifle made to the same quality as his men?
LSA also made some Lee-Speeds, and I’ve read they were made to even higher quality than the BSA Lee-Speeds.
Dammit dammit dammit.
I missed an Animal gun article. Dammit.
*scrolls up*
Its still there.