The Rise of the Bolt-Action Sporter
OK, enough war stuff. Let’s have some fun.
The Big Two – Remington and Winchester
When it comes to 20th century bolt-action sporters in the American market, it’s fair to say that you can list them in three categories: The Winchester Model 70, the Remington 700 and everything else. There’s more to the shooting world than that, of course, so this time out we’ll look at those three and some non-U.S. models as well.
Remember the Pattern 14 and 17 Enfield rifles, built by American manufacturers for the British and American armies? It should come as no surprise that, having tooled up to build those Mauser-style actions, that the two major American rifle builders would use that action for their first round of bolt-action sporters.
As we have previously noted, Remington was first with their Model 30 sporter, initially offered in .30-06 and later in other calibers. What is less known is that Winchester dabbled in a sporter based on the Pattern 17 action as well.
The Winchester Model 51 “Imperial” rifle was a hand-made, carriage trade piece. Only twenty-four were made in 1919, in .30-06, .35 Whelen and “.27 caliber,” a forerunner of the .270 Winchester. Four of these were hand-made pre-production prototypes, with the remaining twenty being hand-made Gunsmith Shop items.
I’ve long lusted after one of these first Winchester bolt-action sporters, but I doubt one will ever appear at a price that I could manage without resulting in Mrs. Animal phoning a divorce lawyer. The very first of these, Serial Number 1 (pictured) a take-down version in .27 caliber, just sold in November 2018 at auction for $24,675. So, I doubt one of these twenty-four rifles will be gracing my gun rack any time soon, and that’s a pity.
Here’s where it gets interesting. One of Winchester’s VPs at the time was a fellow named Frank G. Drew, a staunch proponent of lever guns who considered the very idea of a bolt action sporter to be a trifle silly. He had some influence on the Board of Directors, who cancelled the Model 51 project in 1920.
That didn’t last, obviously. Drew became the President of Winchester Repeating Arms Company in 1924. He was observing success competitor Remington was having with their bolt-action Model 30, and so caused the development of another Winchester bolt gun, also made with the leftover machines and tooling used in the Pattern 17 actions and the Model 51. This new, more economic mass-produced repeater was the Model 54 Winchester, manufactured from 1925 to 1930, and offered in the .22 Hornet, .220 Swift, .250-3000 Savage, .257 Roberts, .270 Winchester, 30-30 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, 7x57mm Mauser, 7.65x53mm Argentine, and 9x57mm Mauser. The Model 54 retained the Pattern 17’s heavy two-stage trigger and had a factory bolt handle and safety that made scope mounting awkward. Primary production on the Model 54 ended in 1930, although a few were assembled from 1930 to 1935.
Happily, in 1936, Winchester improved on the Model 54 when they brought out their immortal Model 70 in 1936, based on a cock-on-open, Mauser 98-type action. Aptly known as the Rifleman’s Rifle, everything a sportsman could want in a bolt-action rifle can be summed up in these words: “Pre-64 Model 70.” Chamberings from 1936 to date have included the .22 Hornet, .222 Remington, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, .223 WSSM, .225 Winchester, .220 Swift, .243 Winchester, .243 WSSM, .250-3000 Savage, .257 Roberts, .25-06 Remington, .25 WSSM, 6.5×55mm, .264 Winchester Magnum,6.5mm Creedmoor, .270 Winchester, .270 WSM, .270 Weatherby Magnum, .280 Remington, 7mm Mauser, 7mm-08, 7 mm Remington Magnum, 7mm WSM, 7mm STW, .300 Savage, .30-06 Springfield, .308 Winchester, .300 H&H Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum, .300 WSM, .300 Weatherby Magnum, .300 RUM, .325 WSM, .338 Winchester Magnum, .35 Remington, .358 Winchester, .375 H&H Magnum, .416 Remington Magnum, .416 Rigby, .458 Winchester Magnum, and .470 Capstick. A great variety of grades and finishes have been available; the U.S. Army and Marines have used Model 70s as sniper rifles (Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock used a Model 70 Winchester in .30-06 with an 8x Unertl scope in his famous exploits in SE Asia.)
In 1964 Winchester’s cost-cutting measures affected the Model 70 as it did many other arms. The big Mauser claw extractor was replaced with a hook extractor, along with other manufacturing and cosmetic changes including the adoption of a simple push-feed action over the old controlled-feed; note that Remington rifles had been using a push-feed design by decades by this point, but the various changes resulted in the Marines cancelling their contract for Model 70 sniper rifles, as the new Winchesters no longer met the Corps’ quality standards. The “classic” Model 70 was reintroduced in 1999 with the controlled feed restored, but at least in the mind of this old gun crank, if you want a Model 70, look for a pre-64.
The Model 70 still has turned in a long and impressive history. Shooting Times magazine in 1999 named it the “Rifle of the Century,” and it’s hard to dispute that assessment.
Remington, though, was likewise producing a classic. Their Model 30 rifles were manufactured until 1940 (from 1926 to 1940 as the Model 30 Express, mounting a Lyman peep sight). In 1940 Remington introduced the final version of a rifle on the Pattern 17 action, the Model 720, which changed to a cock-on-close operation.
About 26,000 Model 20 and 30 Express rifles were built, but only about 2,500 Model 720s. World War 2 interrupted Remington’s production, but in 1948 the Ilion gunmakers came out with two new rifles, really one design in short and long action versions; these were the Models 721 (short action) and 722 (long action.)
During the second World War, Remington’s experience with mass-producing weapons quickly and efficiency had taught their engineers some great lessons. Two of these engineers were a pair of prescient fellows named Mike Walker and Homer Young, who took a look at the traditional Mauser-style action, machined from a forged billet, and came up with another idea: A tubular receiver was easier and quicker to produce, while still allowing great strength and precision. The 721 and 722 were the first products of this design, followed in 1958 by the Model 725. All were push-feed guns with the usual fixed box magazine, small hook extractor and a spring-loaded plunger ejector.
In 1961, Walker and Young’s basic design evolved into one of the best-selling sporting rifles in history, the Remington 700, still manufactured today in a wild variety of calibers and configuration. The 700 has a great reputation for strength, accuracy and reliability, leading to its adoption by military and police forces all over the globe. Loyal sidekick Rat carries one in the game fields, a pre-1993 DuPont Model 700 wearing a Six Enterprises fiberglass stock and a Redfield scope, and has had good success with it.
While my personal preferences lean towards older Winchesters, a beginning, intermediate or experienced shooter or sportsman simply couldn’t go wrong with a Remington 700. No matter your desires in caliber or trim, it’s probable even in the late 20th century, that Remington made a 700 that matched them.
Remington then took a different tack in 1967, introducing the economical Model 788. This was a nine-lug, rear-locking, short action bolt gun with a plain stock and a 3-round detachable box magazine, available in calibers from the .222 Remington to the .308 Winchester. This rifle had a great reputation for accuracy, supposedly in part from the fact that the rear-locking bolt eliminated the locking lug raceways, making the action stiffer and stronger.
Remington and Winchester dominated the 20th century bolt gun world, but they weren’t alone. While the Model 70 and the various Remington models were being admired by the shooting press, some other American companies were learning the bolt gun angle as well.
The Other Guys
We have discussed Savage Arms before in the context of their excellent Model 99 lever gun, but Savage learned the art of building bolt guns in World War 2, when they built #4 MkI Lee-Enfield rifles for the British. With this experience under their belt, Savage rather belatedly turned to the bolt gun market in 1950, with the economical Savage 340. This rear-locking rifle had a plain hardwood stock and a detachable box magazine and was available only in lower-performance rounds like the .22 Hornet .222 and .223 Remington and the .30-30 Winchester. The 340 was serviceable but nothing much to look at, but Savage had a more lasting impact on the bolt gun in 1958, when their engineer Nicholas Brewer devised and (posthumously) patented the rifle that became the first of the Savage 100 series. While lacking some of the polish of Winchester’s and Remington’s offerings, Savage rifles proved solid and reliable, and because of that, when Winchester closed their New Haven plant in 2007 the Savage 110 surpassed the Winchester Model 70 as the oldest continuously manufactured bolt-action rifle on the American market. Another fact of note; in 1959, the Savage 110 became the first American bolt-action rifle to be commercially produced in a left-handed version.
About this same time, Ogden gunmaker of note Browning entered the commercial bolt gun market with the High-Power series of rifles. The story of the Browning High-Power bolt guns is a complicated one, with the larger calibers (up to the .458 Winchester) on FN 98 Mauser actions, while the smaller rounds like the .222 were set up on the Finnish SAKO action.
The High-Power Brownings were beautiful pieces. The FN Mauser and the SAKO actions were finely made, the bluing was high polish, stocks were fine European or American Claro walnut. Three grades were available, Safari, Medallion and Olympian, featuring progressively nicer finishes and fancier wood.
But the High-Power, beautiful as it was, suffered from two flaws: A cheap plastic buttplate and too much drop at the heel of the stock, which made recoil unpleasant, and thin barrels that heated quickly and resulted in less than optimal accuracy. The High-Power was replaced in 1978 or so by the Japanese-made push-feed Browning BBR, which yielded only mediocre sales. But then, in 1984, Browning introduced the A-bolt, with three locking lugs and a short sixty-degree bolt throw. This was at last a bolt gun fully worthy of the Browning name, fast in action, reliable and accurate. The A-Bolt has been made in calibers from .223 Remington to .458 Winchester and is still being made as the AB3 today.
Colt may be best known for handguns and the AR-pattern rifles, but in 1973 Colt struck an agreement with the famous Austrian manufacturer, and the Colt/Sauer rifle was introduced to the American market. This was the Sauer Model 80 on the European market and Colt merely imported it, but the Colt Sauer rifle was unique in one respect: It had a non-rotating bolt with retracting locking lugs, which removed the necessity of locking lug traces in the receiver. This not only made for a strong receiver but also for a very smooth action. Even so, the Colt/Sauer rifle never really caught on competing against the Remington 700 and (even the post-64) Winchester 70; in the end only about 27,000 were imported.
One cannot talk about the twentieth century sporting gun market without mentioning Ruger, and the bolt gun market is no exception. In 1968, Bill Ruger had a designer working for him that took the Model 98 Mauser action, replaced the forged receiver with an investment casting, replaced the bolt block safety with a tang safety and replaced the blade ejector with a plunger ejector. Sullivan also redesigned the trigger and used a rater novel angled front action screw that, in recoil, served to seat the action more solidly into the stock. Bill Ruger approved of the design, and the original M77 Ruger was born.
But Ruger wasn’t done. In 1991 the company almost completely redesigned the M77 as the Mark II, retaining the Mauser-style claw extractor but reverting to a Mauser blade-type ejector, converting to controlled-feed rather than push-feed and changing to a Winchester 70-style fore-and-aft safety that allowed for loading and unloading the rifle with the safety engaged.
I have never owned an original M77 but I have a Mark II in the “T” configuration, with a heavy laminated target stock and a 26” heavy sporter barrel, firing the .243 Winchester; this is a rifle that will send a 6mm pill 400 yards on time and on target. Mrs. Animal has a Mark II Compact in the .260 Remington, a fine, lightweight, light-recoiling little rifle.
These were and are the major players; but there are few American companies that didn’t take a swing at the bolt gun market. Mossberg has produced a few; Smith and Wesson imported some Howa rifles from Japan and slapped the S&W name on them. Even lever-gun maker Marlin has produced a bolt gun. The bandwidth allowed to me here simply won’t allow me to list them all, so I’ve tried to name the major players in the American centerfire bolt gun market.
Before anyone mentions my omission of Roy Weatherby, fear not, I have an article dedicated just to him in the works.
The Europeans
Continental European sporting bolt guns in the 20th century can, in large part, be summed up, like a popular candy, by saying simply “M&M.” Mauser and Mannlicher. Some Finnish upstarts got into the mix, and an Austrian company also got involved. But across the Channel, the Brits were turning out some real masterpieces.
Mauser suffered badly at the end of World War II, for reasons which should be apparent. But in the early 1950s they managed to reform, and one of their first offerings was a design by a fellow named Walter Gehmann, which became the Mauser 66. The 66 couldn’t have departed much further from its Model 98 predecessor; it had an odd telescoping bolt, a set trigger and came as a take-down rifle for easy transport. To my thinking it wasn’t an attractive rifle, but folks who have handled them (I’ve not had the chance) say they have a butter-smooth action and bench-rest accuracy.
Mauser followed up with the Model 77, a more conventional looking bolt gun with three rear locking lugs and a detachable magazine, and then several commercial and military variations on the 66 and the 77. Then, in 1996, they brought out the M1996 straight-pull bolt gun, using a forward-mounted bolt handle at the front of the ejection port to operate its action. The M1996 was an awkward looking thing and didn’t exactly take the market by storm.
But in Austria, another company also rebounded after the war.
Prior to World War II, the Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifles had a strong following all over the world. In fact, if one wishes to read of one used in an unorthodox fashion, read the Ernest Hemingway short story The Short, Happy Life of Francis Macomber.
The M-S rifle’s full-length stock became so iconic, in fact, that the design became known on all makes and models as a “Mannlicher stock.” The combination of the very first Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifle and its 6.5x54mm cartridge became something of a European equivalent of the Winchester 94 and the .30WCF round, an ideal combination of rifle and cartridge such that one can scarcely think of one without the other.
Following the war, Mannlicher re-established themselves as a sporting gun manufacturer. Stoeger imported their rifles into the United States, said imports including the Models 1950, 1952, 1956 and 1961; but it was hard to top that original, the pre-war Mannlicher-Schoenauer.
Up in Finland, the Suojeluskuntain Ase- ja Konepaja Oy (Civil Guard Gun and Machining Works) or SAKO, spent the post-war years marketing the excellent Vixen (short action) and Finnbear (long action) bolt guns. Interestingly, and a bit off topic, SAKO in 1961 introduced the only European-made lever gun I’m aware of, the foll-stocked Finnwolf. In 1992 SAKO intriduced the first of their renovated line with the 591 and finally, in 1997, they brought out the 75, followed in 2006 by the improved M85, which is still made today.
Across the Channel, the Brits were indulging in something they are very good at – producing works of art in walnut and blued steel. In olden times, the Brits had a great tradition of gun making, and two of their finest companies have a considerable history. But the first company we see across the Channel started in Ireland.
We can first cast ourselves back to 1775, when a chap named John Rigby went into business as a gunsmith in Dublin. I won’t go into all of Rigby’s history – that would take an article unto itself – but I will talk about their bolt guns. Rigby bolt guns were and are made on 98 Mauser actions, mostly big, beefy square bridge magnum actions, with walnut stocks you could fall in love with. Calibers are offered up to and including the .416 and .450 Rigby, so if you want to hunt Cape Buffalo or, maybe, a mid-size tyrannosaur, Rigby can set you up.
Over in London is a company bearing a name we must speak in an awed whisper: Holland & Holland. Founded by Harris Holland in 1835, Holland & Holland are the standard by which fine guns everywhere are measured. Their bolt guns, post-World War II, like Rigby use a modified Mauser action, but each rifle is assembled and tuned by hand, by some of the best gunsmiths in the world. Calibers up to the .500 Nitro Express are available, and if you are willing to spend an amount of money that would otherwise buy you a pretty substantial house, you won’t find a more beautiful work of art in a rifle.
There are many more. In Serbia, the Zastava works turns out a pretty fair 98 Mauser action. These have been imported into the US in a variety of names, including the Herter’s J9 and the Interarms Mk X. I have one of the latter rifles, in .30-06, and it’s a solid rifle. Herter’s also imported a BSA bolt gun as the U9, and those rifles also enjoy a good reputation, as evidenced by how few are available on the various auction sites; people who have them are keeping them.
And Then This Happened
The modern era with its attention to all things tactical hasn’t excluded the bolt gun market. Indeed, some of the things that make a good tactical rifle also make a good hunting rifle, especially synthetic stocks, which may be ugly but are also tough and impervious to moisture and dirt. So, while the Tacticool craze encompassed bolt action rifles as well as other weapons, in the case of bolt guns that wasn’t all to the bad. We’ll examine that and other modern trends and the current state of the bolt gun world in general in the ultimate part of this series, coming up next.
I probably haven’t covered half of the notable bolt guns made for the sporting market in the 20th century. From the Great War onward, bolt guns have simply dominated the game fields world over; they are cheaper and easier to make well than doubles, stronger and easier to adapt to heavy cartridges than lever guns, and acceptable in jurisdictions that disapprove of semi-autos. Doing justice to the history of the bolt gun and the state of the market today would require a book rather than a series of articles. In fact, if that’s what one was looking for, one could do a lot worse than to pick up a copy of Wayne Zwoll’s Bolt Action Rifles. Or maybe I’ll write one myself.
I also have not covered .22 rimfire bolt guns at all. That may be an omission, but I can always do an article or two on rimfire rifles alone, and the more I think on it, that may be worth doing.
Meanwhile – stay tuned! We have one more segment in this history to go.
Mossberg has produced a few
I have one in 308. Kicks like a mule. I haven’t even put a full box of ammo through it yet. I keep it because it has the ability to make things stop moving at long distances, not because it’s a pleasure to shoot.
Maybe it’s one of those things where the more I shoot it the less I hate shooting it… I’ll likely never find out.
Its odd, but my .308 kicks harder than my .300. Of course, the .300 weighs a ton (a Remington Sendero with a long heavy barrel), but I think its also the relatively slow burning powder in the .300 bullets. The recoil is more of a shove than a kick. One of the reasons I like that gun (it also eats everything I feed it and shoots sub-MOA groups), even though it weighs a ton. Did I mention its heavy? Mine is the first model, and I think they lightened the barrel for the SF II model.
Some years back I wanted a dark-timber rifle, and I had an M1910 Mex small-ring 98 action in the shop. I had an 18″ light sporter barrel installed, put on a slim, light black walnut stock and a 1-3X scope. Thing only weighed about six and a half, loaded – and it kicked like hell.
Thunder Speaker, a Mag-Na-Ported, ten-pound .338 with a Bell & Carlson stock, is much, much more agreeable to shoot. I sold the Mex.
One of my hunting buddies got one of those ultra-light short-action magnums (can’t recall the caliber). Holy crap, did it kick.
Nice gun, though. He slipped a shot through a hole in some underbrush about the size of a quarter to take a bobcat. Same guy who dropped a running turkey at nearly 40 yards as it crossed an opening less than three feet wide.
I have a very light .243; single shot, synthetic stock, light 18″ barrel. It has a nastier kick than my .30-06.
My Model 70 .280 is the hardest kicking gun I’ve ever shot. And it’s the lightweight. They make a featherweight. I can’t put more than a handful of rounds through without flinching. Not sure why?
I don’t think it’s the model. My dad’s .270 (pre 64) is a pleasure to shoot.
Could be any number of things. Internal and transitory ballistics are the biggest factors in actual recoil, but a whole mess of things contribute to felt recoil; the shape of the butt, overall balance, tre weight of the gun etc. Try using the heaviest bullets you can find for it, see if that helps. Shooting lighter bullets will give the gun a sharper kick, heavier ones will move it more towards a push. The true recoil will be the same assuming powder loads are consistent between the two types of ammunition, but the internal ballistics are a bit different.
I’ll try that, thx.
Been shooting the 140 gr ballistic tips. Could be the issue.
My friends dad is an avid reloader, and loves high weight bullets. He usually uses 260 grain .30-06 custom loads. One day when we were shooting targets up at my friend’s place, he came out and borrowed some of our off the shelf ammo, which was something in the range of 150 to 170 grains. He didn’t even empty the magazine. Same gun he’s been shooting for longer than I’ve been alive, different bullets.
loves high weight bullets
Me, too. I’m not going to shoot at very long distances where the bullet drop could be (more of) a problem, even though the .300 Deerminator is built for, and capable of, exactly those shots. At this point, I might take a 300 yard shot if I had a good rest and a really good sight picture.
Most of his deer hunting is done in large group drives through heavy brush. Most of his deer were killed at less than 100 yards through bushes, so the heavy bullets make total sense.
Been shooting the 140 gr ballistic tips.
Do not like ballistic tips. I was getting perfect .30 caliber exit wounds with those. I went back to soft-nose.
Wide open spaces here. Most shots are over 200 yards. But I could probably get away with a 165 gr. I think that’s the heaviest off the shelf bullet you can get for a .280.
I need a larger caliber rifle. I’m a bit under-gunned for elk.
He owns about 30 acres next to the game lands in Wayne county, maybe 10 miles north of Honesdale, so you’re familiar with the territory. NEPA is a bit different from your current haunts though.
I grew up in Honesdale. Actually, I spent my formative years just outside Pleasant Mount. About 16 miles north of Honesdale. Prolly know him. My dad certainly does.
I know, you promised me a beer at the red schoolhouse. Speaking of, the access road for his hunting grounds is maybe a mile up the road from there. In any event, he lives over in Clifford, but I’d be surprised if your dad doesn’t at least know of the family, they’re loggers and have done a lot of work in Wayne county, pleasant mount in particular.
Sorry, I forgot. (I drink)
No worries, I snagged beer off of Time Loose instead.
I have my grandfather’s Model 30 Express. Light barrel & stock with steel butt plate. Definitely leaves a mark on your shoulder. Unfortunately it has some barrel damage so I’ve always thought of doing a barrel and caliber change.
I have my dad’s Savage 340 in .30-30. Very reliable little rifle.
I have a Tika T3 in .243 WIn. I really like it. The action is extremely smooth and it has a nice light trigger pull.
I’ve been told that Tika is basically SAKO’s “economy” line and have SAKO actions in them. I’m not sure how accurate this is.
Well Tikka was purchased by Sako in 1983, and they do share a lot of design features. The T3 specifically was designed by Sako, so the action is likely very similar to ones used in Sako rifles, but I’m not sure if they’re exactly the same or not.
Source, if you’re curious. The original page is in Finnish, but perfectly valid criticisms of machine translation aside, Google translate will give you the general idea.
Thanks for the link, CL. Interesting.
Best translation error: From the Tech Info section in the sidebar, “Mode of Operation – The Flagpole Lump”
*lights the HM beacon for a rant on machine translation*
Looks like the T3 was designed by Sako engineers, built in a Sako factory, and then had Tikka stamped on the side. I’m not sure if it’s the same action that’s used in, say, Sako’s 85 series, but I have no problem saying that a Tikka has a Sako action.
As an aside, the Sako 85 classic deluxe is drop dead gorgeous.
Damn work internet nanny won’t let me look. 🙁
Benefit of being a filthy millennial that posts from his phone, I don’t have deal with my work firewall. More gun porn for me.
synthetic stocks, which may be ugly but are also tough and impervious to moisture and dirt
I have synthetic stocks on all but one of my longarms. The one is a Ruger 22-250 that just won’t shoot straight (I suspect it needs finely-tuned handloads, if even that would work, which ain’t happening) doesn’t have one because its not worth it to replace the stock since I never use it. I tend to beat up my hunting guns and would rather not beat up a nice wooden stock. Plastic? Who cares.
Yeah, my serious hunting rifles generally wear synthetic stocks. I do love some nice walnut – but when I’m carrying something beautiful, I’m constantly worked about scratches and dents.
The Holland and Holland website is so incredibly pretentious, the guns must really be nice.
But this is absurd.
Thanks, Animal!
The recliners and tray tables in back look nice.
Those are normal parts of the RR Autobiography line… the H&H stuff is the colours, metal engraving and the gun locker in the back.
The monocle holders are a nice touch.
Heidy Ho Jeeves! Fetch me my tea!
You’re missing the best part:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDAwPfh_62s
That is glorious.
I have a plasma rifle in the 40 Watt range….
So a true bolt action rifle.
You got my joke!
I keep meaning to buy a 10/22 with the Mannlicher stock. I really like the look.
I’ve always wanted a straight-pull Swiss K31. Supposedly the most accurate general issue military rifle in history. The odd 7.5mm ammo might be a problem.
If I land a job before my severance pay runs out, I may indulge in one of the new tacti-cool bolt-action tack drivers. This one looks particularly cool.
OT: TL;DR – The revolution eats its own.
https://quillette.com/2019/06/01/watching-my-own-excommunication-on-a-facebook-video/
The self-obsession is incredible.
These are people who would gladly, fervently accuse another of witchcraft to draw attention to themselves. The author has sympathy for them, but he should be frightened. They have no moral bulwark against harming “the other” as long as it benefits them.
I got about halfway through it. These people are totes stable.
Stable *geniuses*.
OT: From an evolutionary perspective, men do have less intrinsic value than women. A man can impregnate thousands of women, a woman can have, at most, a couple dozen children. Therefore, it makes sense for women’s well-being to be prioritized.
From an ethical perspective, the idea that certain people are disposable is abhorrent (let’s not touch abortion here). Of course, this is all in service of a political agenda, as most evil mass movements are.
https://quillette.com/2019/06/03/considering-the-male-disposability-hypothesis/
NB: The quotes at the beginning of the article are mind-boggling.
In reference to the Hillary quote about women being the primary victims of war, in my mind, that was pure political opportunism on her part. Hillary doesn’t care one way or another, she only cares about how the quote focus-group tests.
That was good, Q. Well written reasonable article.
I think it’s related to why it’s always “Mother of two dies in car crash” or “Mother falls off cliff” or “Mother shot by ex-boyfriend”, etc. in news headlines, even when the person’s motherhood is unrelated to the story. You almost never see that done with men. Women (especially mothers) and children must be preserved, men are disposable.
There was little actual dialogue, but rather a succession of inward-focused monologues.
No kidding.
“Right now…sitting in this room, I do not feel safe. I…do…not…feel…safe. Home was not safe. Ceremony was not safe…I’m screwed. Where is a safe space?”
For some reason, I immediately thought of this:
“He should have armed himself……. if he’s going to decorate his saloon with my friend.”
“Right now…sitting in this room, I do not feel safe.”
Sounds like this person needs a good therapist. This does not sound like a healthy mind.
They’re not at all. Yet they are encouraged to sit in judgement of others.
“I don’t feel safe” has become the wokester equivalent of a cop saying “I feared for my life.”
“Right now…sitting in this room, I do not feel safe.”
Another take on this… I listen to a Buddhist podcast, and today the guy told a parable about a man who was barefoot, and tried to cover all the sharp rocks of the world with leather so he wouldn’t hurt his feet. Then his teacher told him he could never find enough leather to cover the bad parts of the world, but he could make sandals so he’d be protected wherever he walked. IOW, learn how to deal with the bad parts of the world yourself, instead of trying to change the world.
Whoever is pushing this “safe space” crap is destroying people.
In a saner age, their loved ones would be gently urging them into treatment.
In a more ruthless age, they would set out on a People’s Crusade, get captured by slavers, and spent the rest of their lives breaking rocks in a Levantine hellhole.
Now I await the next episode, the Roy Weatherby one. I like bolts but I’m a leftie. There are a few LH actions out there but I’m not in need of another. CZ makes a good looking one though. I’ve reach the point where more isn’t a game changer and I don’t shoot much anymore anyway. Thanks for the great article.
I had a M.Wards 30-06, right hand of course, made by Mossberg? I really liked the gun, shot several deer, gave it to my right handed son, who probably never has shot it. A good, reliable, really Plain Jane, keep in the truck kind of gun. I never had a problem with the bolt ’cause I rarely needed a follow up shot. Not bragging but shooting deer at 30-40 yards doesn’t require precision.
Note: The very next episode will be the state of the bolt gun market today. The Weatherby article will be a little further down the road.
Thanks, I’ll wait, I have the time
My neighbor has a CZ rifle and let me shoot it. Seems really nice and I could hit what I aimed at!
I am a huge fan of the CZ bolt guns. The CZ 527 in 7.62×39 is probably my favorite bolt action to shoot and its in a caliber just perfect for everything from groundhogs to whitetail deer.
>>few LH actions
Hey now – a man slows down when he gets older
I will hold the author of this post personally responsible the next time a mass shooting occurs in the US using a Holland & Holland bolt gun.
That would …messy.
We need common sense elephant gun control!
I had a clueless co-worker ask me about the danger of .50 cal rifles being used in crimes once. I asked him how likely criminals were to use a $15,000 rifle to commit a robbery.
A 32 pound, four and a half foot, $15,000 rifle.
Accepted.
OT: Lest anyone think that corruption and venality is strictly the purview of Team Blue.
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-real-problem-conservatism-faces-today/
The real problem NRO “conservatism” faces today is people figuring out how their shtick as honorable losers.
Political consultants are bottom of the barrel pieces of shit in general.
It’s no surprise to me that they’re defrauding donors.
But hey, tell me again how David French’s “civility and decency” are what’s holding the conservative movement back!
Well, I think the Concession Speech Conservatives are holding conservatives back, yes. Less so now, as they are increasingly marginalized.
My question is, why is there in enforcement action against he bad actors described in the article. Some of the PACs are outright frauds, collecting money for campaigns that don’t even exist. For some, fraud may be a bit of a reach (collecting millons based on representations that you will support candidates, and then spending a few tens of thousands on those candidates is close enough to fraud for me). IANALitigator, but these seem to have “class action” tattooed on their ass.
I would suspect that they are politically connected and directly involved with the FEC, which seems to not care about anything unless it threatens the duopoly.
The FEC is useless. I’m thinking civil suit, class action brought on behalf of their donors.
Would the bubonic plague really kick it up a notch in the Pyrite State?
https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/ten-plagues-of-california-are-turning-the-golden-state-into-a-third-world-hell-hole/
Apologies to Glibs living behind the Iron Curtain.
I read those articles and I wonder if the problems aren’t being exaggerated for political effect. I don’t go to CA much at all, and I haven’t ever been to LA (except for a transfer at LAX, which was a freak/horror show of its own). I haven’t been to San Fran is ten years(?). In San Diego last summer, didn’t see much, but didn’t really get around the city that much, either.
Is it really that bad?
Can’t speak to LA or SF proper, but I did take a business trip to San Jose/Silicon Valley last year and I was shocked by the sheer number of homeless people. Anywhere there was a modicum of shelter; freeway overpasses, bus stops, park gazeboes, etc. there were homeless people camped there. Every single one. Frankly, the only places I’ve ever seen more homeless people were in Cancun and New Delhi. I didn’t personally see the piles of human waste/needles, but I’m sure wherever there is that large a volume of “informal dwellings” there are going to be a host of social pathologies.
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.7825422,-122.4123516,3a,45.5y,105.97h,82.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5zCb2O1967il3wnr-Mt1kQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
See for yourself.
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.7849493,-122.412374,3a,75y,135.71h,89.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqRCzJ3TmgKdDFm0TzisIpA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Wander around in street view.
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.78432,-122.4143488,3a,15y,233.19h,79.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKxu05QKqu2CGkiY_IqOfYw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
My wife went on a business trip to SF two years ago. She described it as a nightmare. She saw the feces on the street. There were homeless guys everywhere.
One of her coworkers had to chase off one aggressive homeless guy whom she thought was getting ready to mug her as she was walking out of the hotel.
And, while there she caught an intestinal bug that she described as the worst she’s ever gotten.
She used to love San Francisco but says she hates what it has become. She says she wouldn’t dare walk anywhere there anymore.
Interesting how the liberal cosmopolitans who love Mexican immigrants, buy all sorts of foreign products and new technology and go to ethnic restaurant and travel overseas and hate Trump and Socons have lead to the exact opposite of what the cosmotarians claim will happen.
What we need are open borders. Third world banana republic monkeys all deserve a chance at the good life.
Yes, because allowing people the freedom to buy and sell to each other is exactly equivalent to paying salaries to people who want to live in squalor.
free trade has nothing to do with what is going on in California or the immigration stance of the left. Nothing whatsoever.
Given that the immigration policy of the left has nothing to do with open borders, nor the inevitable outcome of CA cities paying people to shit on their streets, I’m not sure why you brought it up.
I wonder to what extent the blue states are thinking like the slave states at the founding? I.e., get lots of people here who count for apportioning representatives, but don’t actually have legal rights. Your states voters get more representation per capita. Maybe not, maybe it’s just Cloward-Piven.
In my opinion their entire policy is based on three planks:
1) Create a dependent class of people whose miserable state makes rolling back the welfare state look heartless.
2) Shore up the hispanic voting block to supporting Democrats by painting anti-immigrants as being hostile to hispanics.
3) Give them an excuse to paint people trying to assert the rule of law as racists.
I don’t pay attention to voting patterns anymore, so I can’t really say whether 2 is successful or not, but they are being very successful on planks 1 and 3.
Your states voters get more representation per
capitacitizen.I did the math awhile back but can’t recall exactly how it came out, but I recall CA would lose several representatives if we apportioned by citizen rather than by person.
One of my least favorite results of the War Between the States was the creation of “United States Citizens” as a special category of human. Of course, in order to properly dispose of that distinction, we’d have to eliminate the welfare state (and ideally public schools), so I guess that ain’t happening in my lifetime.
I don’t own any bolt actions, but I’ve enjoyed this series immensely.
Thank you.
I don’t own any bolt actions
Well, what are you waiting for?
She’s in California.
I dad bought me my first rifle in the mid 80’s at the local Tru Value store. It was a Ruger M77 .270. I bagged my first and only buck with it at 250 yards with no issues. I recently got it back from my dad after buying many of my own. It was still sitting in his closet with 20 years of dust on it. It was never cleaned or shot since it was put away and dropped an unknown number of times by my mom while cleaning around it.
First shot after cleaning and oiling it for the first time dead center at 200 yards. So now I’m using it to target shoot and loving it.
You are a lucky man, Timeloose, with great parents. Other moms might have wanted to get rid of the dangerous thing before it shoots someone.
Kick?
I have a Ruger No.1 in 375 H&H. Need I say more?
If you have a falling block action it almost demands a monster caliber.
One shot and it gives you that special headache like nothing else. It yanks the muscles in the back of your neck and across your scalp no matter how you hold the thing.
I will say that if you need firepower it does deliver. I also have an FN Mauser in .458 win mag but I think the 375 is a step up.
Yeah, luckily there isn’t anything in Florida that requires anything that big. I’ll stick with my moderately powerful rifles.
What about your cousin, the other Florida Man?
What is dead, can never die…
Met UCS and enjoyed a meal while talking about geeky writing. To make sure he recognized me I took my Hat and Hair coffee mug (ON SALE NOW!!!)
…and now both you and UCS are the talk of the internet. UCS has done what no other glib has ever done, taken a vacation specifically to meet other glibs. He is a brave man….
One of your Bee spies broke cover and harassed poor CPRM in the parking lot. You should train them better.