The Perfect Double-Action Revolver
Resolved: The Smith & Wesson .44 Hand Ejector 1st Model “New Century,” otherwise known as the “Triple Lock” is the standard by which all double-action revolvers must be judged. Now that that’s established, let’s take a closer look at this scion of modern double-action sixguns, how it came to be, who used it, who made it famous, how it changed the way shooters looked at sixguns and what they expected from them; and not least, let’s take a closer look at why it remains today perhaps the most significant double-action revolver ever made.
The Forerunners
First, we must cast our optics back to the year 1889. During and since the War of the Northern Aggression, the folks at Colt had dominated the military sidearm market, leaving Smith & Wesson to fend off the civilian trade. Their offerings were all variations of a kind; top-break revolvers that were fast to reload but had a significant weakness in their hinged frames.
But in 1889, Colt introduced something new. This (as we saw in the History of Sixguns series) was the Colt Model 1889, the first production double-action revolver with a solid frame and a swing-out cylinder. Colt quickly followed this up with the M1892 Army and Navy and the excellent, big, tough Colt New Service, which was available in heavy revolver rounds like the .44WCF and .45 Colt.
Smith & Wesson rose to the challenge, but their first swing-out double-action was a pipsqueak; in 1896 they introduced the .32 Hand Ejector in .32 Long, and in 1905 they followed up with the 1905 Hand Ejector in .38 Special. This last gun was to give rise to the K frame revolvers and the near-immortal Model 10, but that’s not the gun we’re here to discuss.
It was in 1908 that Smith & Wesson hit the home run.
The New .44
It’s not often that a gun manufacturer comes up with the perfect blending of gun and cartridge. Winchester did it with the .30WCF and the M1894 lever gun. Colt and John Browning did it with the M1911 and the .45 ACP. And Smith & Wesson did it with the Triple Lock and the .44 Special.
The .44 Hand Ejector First Model’s designers did more than just scale up Smith & Wesson’s smaller .32 and .38 revolvers. The new gun retained the swing-out cylinder, but added the feature that gave the gun its nickname; in addition to the lockup at the cylinder face and the end of the ejector rod, taken from the earlier Smiths, the new gun added a locking lug on the crane that locked into a recess in the frame.
This was the first of Smith & Wesson’s big-frame revolvers. This frame, which would become known as the N frame, would go on to yield such famous pieces as George Patton’s Registered Magnum and Harry Callahan’s Model 29, but the Triple Lock was the first.
This combination of three locking features – the Triple Lock – yielded a revolver that was strong enough for the new load, which was took the old .44 Russian case that Smith & Wesson had chambered in the break-top Schofield revolvers, and lengthened it, adding powder capacity. The first loads used 26 grains of black powder and a 246-grain round nose lead bullet, but in these early years hand-loaders were already experimenting. New bullets and newfangled smokeless powders were becoming available, new power levels were being achieved, and the big, tough new Smith made a perfect test bed.
The First Model guns were expensive. The Triple-Lock required a lot of careful hand-fitting and tuning to make it lock up properly and maintain cylinder timing, but when well-set up it was utterly reliable with almost any ammunition. And the Triple Lock is a joy to handle; smooth, with a long but glassy double action pull and a crisp single-action trigger. Over the years I’ve had the opportunity to handle and shoot two .44 Special Triple Locks, and I’ve been watching for the opportunity to add one to my own collection for some time.
Elmer Keith and the .44 Special
As much as any of Smith & Wesson’s marketing people, it was a Montana cowboy, hunter, guntwist and adventurer named Elmer Keith that was responsible for the fame of the new revolver and cartridge.
Keith had cut his teeth on single-action sixguns and always remained fond of the Colt Single Action Army and the .45 Colt round, but he was also quick to see the advantages of the big new Smith and its swing-out cylinder. A committed big-bore fan, Keith liked to stoke his sixgun handloads up plenty strong, and the big-framed Smith was plenty tough enough for the hot loads he cooked up.
In his benchmark work Sixguns, Keith wrote of the Triple Lock and its cartridge:
Daniel B. Wesson, after fifty-two years of distinguished service, passed away in 1906. In 1907 Smith & Wesson brought out their Triple Lock, perhaps the finest revolver ever manufactured anywhere, at any time. Today no example of finer revolver making is to be had. The rear end of the barrel and the cylinder steel of the old triple lock are not as strong as in the present 1950 model Target S&W. .44 calibers or the .357 S&W. Magnum, but the old New Century was, and still is, one fine gun in any company.
They designed the .44 Special cartridge for this arm with 26 grains of black powder, instead of the 23 used in the .44 Russian cartridge. The .44 Special is simply a longer version of the .44 Russian and no more accurate sixgun load exists.[i]
Keith experimented extensively with heavy loads for the .44 Special in both Triple Locks and the later N-frame Smith & Wesson 1950 Target revolvers. He pressured friends at Remington and Smith & Wesson to legitimize his efforts until, in 1955, Smith & Wesson introduced an offspring of the Triple Lock that would become the Model 29. While Bill Ruger had beat Smith & Wesson to the punch by a few months, making the single-action Ruger Blackhawk the first production .44 Magnum, Smith & Wesson’s Model 29 caught on quickly, not least of which was because of Elmer Keith’s enthusiastic advocacy – and thus, the Triple Lock’s legacy lived on.
The Triple Lock itself, however, was gone by this time. The gun, as we noted, was expensive to make. In 1915, after only seven years of production, the revolver was redesigned. The Second Model did away with the third locking lug and the ejector shroud, making the gun cheaper to build and sell, and the Triple Lock production ended with a total of only 15,376 copies built.
The N Frame Revolvers
The true legacy of the Triple Lock, of course, is in its descendants, those being all the various N-frame sixguns that Smith & Wesson has produced and continues to produce to this day. The third locking lug has not been seen since the original .44 Hand Ejector 1st Model New Century, but the N-frame remains perfect for heavy sixgun loads; a big, beefy steel frame with a strong topstrap, stout crane and thick sidewalls, more than capable for hot handloads in the .44 Special and .45 Colt, not to mention the .44 Magnum.
The CCW market has driven handgun producers to an ever-increasing diversity of small, light concealable pieces, mostly semi-autos; I own a few such and favor the Glock 36 for everyday carry. But there will always be a place for a heavy holster sixgun for serious work in forest and field, and the N-frame guns are admirably suited for just that.
As I have described here before on several occasions, my own favorite holster iron for outdoor work is a grandchild of the Triple Lock; mine is a 1970s-vintage Smith & Wesson 25-5 in .45 Colt, heavy but not too heavy to carry all day without complaint, and plenty tough enough for the hot .45 Colt loads I push through it.
The Triple Lock’s children and grandchildren are even tougher, mostly due to greatly improved machining techniques and metallurgy, but the Triple Lock remains, as Keith pointed out, a fine gun in any company.
Today
The big N-frame Smith & Wessons are still made. The big sixguns are no longer offered new in the .44 Special but, of course, the .44 Magnum is still available.
I confess, though, to being a little disappointed in the new Smith & Wessons. In 2000, Smith & Wesson added to all their revolvers an internal safety lock actuated by a key via an aperture above the cylinder lock slide; this bit of lawyerly pettifoggery has a bad reputation for failing at the wrong moment. Triggers are heavier than on older guns, although Smith & Wesson’s fit and finish remains generally good.
Happily, the various online auction and sale sites have plenty of older guns for sale. Triple Locks are scarce and command high prices, but there are enough other, less scarce N-frame guns to satisfy the collecting urges of almost any big-bore sixgunner.
The Triple Lock was a once-in-a-century sidearm – innovative, well-made, well-fitted, reliable and tough, with a new cartridge that proved to have great potential. From its initial design descended an entire series of handguns, used by millions in forests, fields, streets and battlefields. We haven’t seen its like since, which is why the Smith & Wesson .44 Hand Ejector 1st Model “New Century” remains the standard by which all double-action revolvers must be judged.
[i] Keith, Elmer. Sixguns. Sportsman’s Vintage Press. Kindle Edition.
In 2000, Smith & Wesson added to all their revolvers an internal safety lock actuated by a key via an aperture above the cylinder lock slide; this bit of lawyerly pettifoggery has a bad reputation for failing at the wrong moment.
Ick.
Right?
Safety Nazis suck.
Is it removable?
yes
Should have asked “Can it be removed safely?”.
Sure. It’ll cost you.
The “Hillary Hole?”
Its where the gun’s soul leaks out.
I have a 642PC purchased NIB a couple years ago with no lock.
https://www.amazon.com/photos/shared/WzGXaJ7xQL2MWJCsx18crg.05wzsnRfuTCLHlTiNyBD1N
Congratulations! You and your gun are now recorded in Amazon’s totally-nothing-to-worry-about digital database of guns and gun owners!
I limit my worrying about that to not exposing serial #s.
That is a sweet little snubby, BTW. Something like that is on my “Think seriously about getting someday.”
How long did you own it before the boating accident?
The sea was angry that day, my friends…
Like an old man trying to send back soup in a deli?
Waiter, taste the soup!
Well, GunBroker already has me.
At the match last weekend, I was in a squad with one of the old-timers who shoots revolvers. I’ve seen him shoot a number (most notably his Colt Python) but this time he had something I can’t quite identify — I think it was a S&W 929. It was big, stainless, with a cylinder holding 8 9mms. It was also giving him fits. At least a third of the time it was only putting tiny proto-dimples into the primers instead of firing them. When I asked about it, he said he went with it because he wouldn’t need to reload as often (the stages are set up with 8 round capacity in mind) and that he was having some difficulty getting the .38s aligned properly. He also couldn’t see the 9mm holes in the targets, so he was taking shots he didn’t need to (one time I taped up after him and he had put four shots into the -0 portion, when the scoring was best two. )
I would be greatly concerned about a firearm that behaved like that. Also, when you say he was using 9mm, are you talking parabellum in something like half moon clips, or a different 9mm cartridge?
Moon clips.
And yeah. Looking on the S&W website, I’d be shitting kittens if a $1000+ gun was giving light strikes.
Yeah, He needs a gunsmith to work it over. (I’m assuming he is not himself one.)
Probably. Sounds like it could also be a problem with his reloads. After a round or two of that, I wouldn’t be trying to shoot it until I found out (and fixed it).
His belt was full of spindles, each supporting three loaded moon clips. It was rather hilarious looking. I’ve never seen anyone carry an entire match’s worth of ammo before. When he shoots the Colt, he only carries 3-4 speed loaders with the rest kept on his cart.
People screw up revolver gunsmithing with the regularity of the tides. I’ll bet he installed a lighter hammer spring to get a nice light double action trigger pull. Often, a wheelgun with a light hammer spring will only function with a particular brand of primers (Federal, if anyone cares.)
I seem to recall reading an article about some target shooter using one of those to hit a balloon at 1000 yards.
Here it is… Jerry Mikulek.
It is not unheard of for reloader to put magnum primers in non-magnum calibers and then complain when the firing pin barely dents them.
The perfect article: sums up a corner of the pistol world with exactly the scope, history, personalities, and ballistics that folks need to hear.
Suthen and I are both SW686 owners (L frame 357). It was cataloged as the Distinguished Combat Masterpiece. I don’t carry it any more, but that gun’s legacy comes straight from the triple lock.
I had a 586. Sold it to my son in law when I went all in on .45s, but it was and is a great piece.
I have two Don. 586 with a 4″ and a 686 with a 6″. I wouldn’t trade ’em for the world.
When I was looking to get a revolver I recalled your praise for SW686 and got one myself. It’s so pleasant to shoot it.
wow
SW triggers weren’t flawless and needed work back in the day so you get the most out of them in DA
You can add me to the 686 club. I have a 1985 6″ with parade grips I bought unfired a couple years ago. It was something I couldn’t pass up, and it has since become my favorite gun. Tack driver that goes bang every time you pull the trigger. Much prefer the older guns since the firing pin is where it belongs: on the hammer.
Also, good article Animal. ??
So, who does the “satellite” actually belong to?
I’m thinking its theirs, once its on their property uninvited, so to speak. I think that makes it “abandoned” property. We just took possession of a whole bunch of commercial kitchen equipment and office furniture that a tenant left behind in one of our buildings.
I would have thought very seriously about charging them for the privilege.
precedent probably comes from international nautical law
I’d be more interested in what my Geiger counter says and getting that junk off my land
Interesting. Look more at salvage law than abandoned property. I like that. There may even be something in treaties specific to “satellites”, although I doubt whether something dangling from a balloon counts.
I would have called my lawyer and the local police about the guy trespassing.
“someone from Raven Industries”
No comment.
Sattelite belongs to the company, but the property owner can certainly charge them for access to the property, any damages caused by it landing there, and “storage” for however long it was on their property.
As always, Animal, a great article. It doesn’t hurt when it supports my belief and accidental boat accident inventory.
I read, some years ago, the Elmer claimed to have killed a deer at 800 yards with his .44. Some ballistic expert estimated he’d have had to hold 46 feet over. I believe Elmer really liked the big guns (a lot).
I did take a porcupine at about 20 feet so I can personally attest to the power of a .44 Mag and accuracy of a 629.
Thanks for writing the article, as always interesting and informative.
Was there anything left of the porcupine?
My mental image is the mess I made being too close to the mouse with an air rifle scaled up to more of a mess.
He was dead, my main concern.
Well, I didn’t expect there was much doubt there.
Years ago, I plugged a raccoon (sick, holed up in my toolshed) with my .45. It was . . . messy.
I can imagine. At least with my mouse the upper bound on what there was to clean up was lower. Thinking about cleaning up a larger animal reminds me that I’m out of nitrile gloves and need to order more.
I like a guy who can laugh at himself.
If I can’t laugh at myself, who can I laugh at?
Pope Jimbo
Everybody laughs at me. 🙁
I once hit a 10oz beer can at nearly 600(?) yards with my browning hi-power. I set the can up and counted my paces back to the car then I took careful aim and raised the gun to ‘oh about there should do it’ and carefully squeezed off the shot. A second or two passed and the can fell over. I had to rub my eyes to make sure. Then I had to walk back to the can to be certain. Yep, dead center. I think I was nearly speechless the rest of the day. Unluckiest beer can in history.
As for the 44 mag I have a Winchester 94 chambered in that cartridge sporting a 24″ barrel (the longest ’94 barrel). Inside 250 yards it shoots like a real, no-shit rifle cartridge. Of course I make moderately hot loads specifically for that rifle but I would dare you to watch it shot against the 30-30 and tell the difference.
In my opinion the 44 magnum tops the list of best all around cartridges ever. It can be loaded down to 44spl/45 colt levels (700-800 fps) and in the rifle up to nearly 2000 fps. Bullet weights go from 185 grains to 300 grains. Good for everything from plinking to self-defense to hunting medium to large game. God Bless Smith & Wesson and Elmer Keith.
The point of my telling that story is Keith’s 800 yard deer with a model 29 is likely of the same order.
Unlucky deer.
Some years back a watermelon farmer saw some fellows stealing watermelons on the far side of his 80 acre field (a little over half of a mile away).
he fired one shot in the air to get their attention and hopefully get them to leave. The bullet came down and landed right between one of those fellows eyes. Dropped him in his tracks.
Bullets do strange things just when you don’t want them to.
This is why you don’t get invited to any weddings in Saudi Arabia, you know.
It’s important to point out that Keith’s 800-yard deer shot was on a wounded buck that was about to disappear over a ridge, therefore, nothing to lose by taking the shot. As I recall he hit it at least twice, with a couple of witnesses.
I’m your Huckleberry. ///youdidn’tsetmeupforthat
Take my Libertarian Credentails away but i hope i just blew out the eardrums of the scammer who just called me 3 times in 20 min.
The worst thing you can do to them is keep them on the line. Mix and match “Huh” “uh how” “what do you mean” “yeah ok” takes no effort from you, and you are reducing their conversion rate. They care about that much, much more than being yelled at.
I mean i techincally yelled at them. but it was nothing coherent, and it was calculated to inflict pain. I know wasting their time is what to do but after 7 calls a day for 3 months, my patience with it wears thin.
If you really want to fuck with them, let them get through some of their shpiel, listen (as Leap advises) and then wait for a moment to ask them if they’d “like to talk about their relationship with the Lord.” Watch how fast they suddenly want to get off of the phone. THEN the fun really begins. Now you try to keep THEM on the phone. And when they start making excuses to get off, lecture them very politely, but in a school-marm-ish tone, about how you listened to their bit and if you had indicated interest they would have been fine with staying on the phone. Then ask them about the importance of their immortal soul, etc. I haven’t gotten many more of those since I did that. The woman hung up on me while I was still asking about Jesus.
Ain’t nobody got time for that.
That + I hate drama.
Drama? There’s no drama. We’re on a phone call and I’m standing in my kitchen making coffee. The woman seemed frustrated when she hung up, but she signed up for the job to be a telemarketer and called me. I just happened to want to talk about God. (As Leap says, it’s really about their conversion rate and they need numbers, so I’m returning the favor she did me by spamming my phone).
Maybe not drama drama. But going to that much effort is intellectually and emotionally draining to me. My brain is too full to mess around with telemarketers.
If I answer, and I don’t get a “hello” back within one or two seconds, I hang up.
If I’ve got nothing better to do and it’s super convenient, I say I’m so glad you called, but I need just a minute and then I can take this call I’ll be right back
and then set the phone down by the television until they die
Telemarketer: Sir, I’d like to…
Me: Hold on, just finishing up a really good dump. *groans a couple of times* Aw hell, I’m out of toilet paper. Wait a minute, wait a minute…. now what did I do with the shit rag?
Yeah, Moj, I don’t do it all the time because I’m generally busy. Every once in a while when I have time, however, it’s worth it for the chuckle later. I just love the silence when I bust out the standard Jehovah’s Witness, door-to-door line. You can tell they’re just utterly unprepared for that one and it instantly changes the whole dynamic of the call, which is really all I’m doing it for. It might be just as funny to jump into that silence and yell, “PSYYYCCHH!!” and then hang up… like a reverse crank call.
See? Scruffy knows how to get into the spirit of it!
/fist bumps Scruffy
/On second thought, hands Scruffy some TP first
Put phone on speaker, drop in front pocket, keep talking while doing whatever you were doing before. Doesn’t take any time or brain power at all.
Back in the days when telemarketers were more prevalent I would ask “Can you hold on a moment?” Then put the phone down and go for a long walk.
I’ve been known to have long conversations in Japanese with some of them.
My hope was that my number would get black holed as non-English speaking.
I think this tweet relates as a romanian reading these
https://mobile.twitter.com/Lavish_Fixation/status/1188222160747167744
? ?? ?
foul: 9 is a non-standard number under EU rule 246810121620243236
report yourself to the Hague
Thou Shalt not count to four, being one past 3. 5 is Right out.
A Texan would never say clips when they meant magazines.
Well, there was that guy using 9mm and moon clips upthread…
God I hate that stupid bit of gun pedantry. Clip started off as stripper clip and is not really a good term for the item. Magazine started off as a freaking room full of powder, and is even worse. Everybody knows what you mean regardless of which you use.
That’s why i call it the “Thing that goes up and then click”
Is it a shoulder thing that goes up?
But then we wouldn’t have the magazine clips jokes.
Ahoy, matey!
It was in fortifications before it was onboard a ship.
I’ve got zero problem with clips but
don’t call an automatic a pistol or a musket a rifle or anything with fewer than 30 lugnuts a truck
ugh: an automatic a revolver
obviously, you knew what I meant
I didn’t. I was trying to figure out why you drew a line between autoloaders and pistols.
LOL! I was literally starting a long diatribe leaning heavily on such evidence as the p in acp.
If you remove enough lug nuts, a truck turns into a car?
That’ll come in handy parallel parking sometime, I have no doubt.
Ordained by God.
Former Clinton adviser Dick Morris said Hillary Clinton likely wants to jump into the 2020 Democratic presidential primary because she feels “entitled” to the presidency.
“My feeling is that she wants to,” Morris said Sunday on John Catsimatidis’s radio show about “the ghost of Hillary” entering the presidential race.
“She feels entitled to do it. She feels compelled to do it. She feels that God put her on the Earth to do it. But she’s hesitant because she realizes the timing is bad,” he said. “She’s got to wait until Biden drops out because he’s obviously next in line for it, and if he goes away, there’s an opening for her.”
Morris said the “question is” whether there are enough moderate voters for the former secretary of state to beat “leftist” Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.
No shit, Sherlock. Everybody in the country has the feeling that she wants to.
Starting to remind me of the shirts they sold in the back of Rolling Stone when I was younger…
Tan, Rested, and Ready!
Nixon in ’92!
I was sitting here trying to figure out how to attach an inline amp to a plastic or fiberglass panel (don’t have that yet, so not sure of the construction), and was thinking about how to affix an elastic strap to the substrate. All the while, I’d forgotten that I’d already attached velcro to the inline amp to attach it to another item, and I’d just need to put the same facing velcro on the panel to put the amp there. (Self-adhesive strips are cheap, and will hold the weight in question.)
I was sitting here trying to figure out how to attach an inline amp to a plastic or fiberglass panel (don’t have that yet, so not sure of the construction), and was thinking about how to affix an elastic strap to the substrate.
If it’s not something you need to pull off on a recurring basis, there’s always double sided foam tape.
It’s something that I move from application to application. Which is why it currently has velcro on it. I don’t generally need more than one, so I just take the same one along.
Lolz
https://www.boredpanda.com/car-curb-jumpers-w-maple-omaha-rock/?utm_source=feedly&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=organic
You try to idiot proof something and nature just makes bigger idiots.
That’s awesome.
Concur. So. Many. Idiots.
Loved the Jeep showing off its mad bouldering skillz, tho.
Yup. I’ve read about this location before.
I have to wonder if there is something about the juxtaposition of the road, background, sun, etc that is making drivers misjudge the turn.
Sadly 11 foot 8 Bridge is going to be rebuilt for additional clearance.
We got one of those in town, bitch of it is there is no real easy detour, one way takes a bout two miles, the others only about one half mile but if you don’t know the streets its easy to get spun around, so when some yahoo gets stuck traffic backs up.
The westbound I-64 Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel is 12 inches shorter (13 ft 6 in) than the eastbound. There are daily traffic stoppages because an overheight rig gets up to the tunnel before being stopped by VDOT.
A lot of truck drivers will pneumatically lower their rig to clear it. Occasionally you’ll see fresh scrape marks on the ceiling as they don’t quite make it at 60 mph.
Well the tunnel was clear to the twelve foot line
But the chickens was (sic) stacked to thirteen – nine
– Ballad of Wolf Creek Pass
I see a lot of women standing outside the vehicles.
Too busy texting and/or talking.
It does seem like men and women have different kinds accidents of stupidity.
With men it seems to involve aggression and speed with women inattentiveness and lack of situational awareness.
I can’t count how many women I’ve seen typing on their phones while moving with traffic at 70 mph.
All I have to do is look to my immediate left to see a woman driving on the DC Beltway applying makeup and talking to her brother over speakerphone. I cannot for the life of me understand how my wife has never been in an accident.
The 11 foot 8 bridge is legendary — there are a ton of Youtube videos of it in action (so to speak). Very funny to watch the entire roof of of a moving van being peeled right off.
It’s something that I move from application to application. Which is why it currently has velcro on it. I don’t generally need more than one, so I just take the same one along.
Velcro, for the win.
Chaotic good vs lawful good. I think preemption is generally overreaching by people to get done at state/federal what they couldn’t at local/state. But I like the outcome in this case.
Eh. This kind of pre-emption law protects the rights of citizens, and is thus an appropriate use of government power. The BoR is effectively a pre-emption law.
Only after the 14th amendment and it was incorporated. Prior to that it was a restraint only on the Federal Government. But i agree, that Preemption that says “you are not allowed to go further than this” are good.
we have state preemption here in VA. but likely going away wrt 2A this November. my city already has gun control regs passed and ready to go into effect.
Click it. You know you want to.
Dream with us, of a world of equality and harmony
Income inequality is raging out of control. The rich keep getting richer and everyone else keeps falling ever further behind.
Not only is such drastic inequality unfair economically, but it is also destroying our democracy politically. It has led to the rise of a destructive strain of far-right populism that is tearing apart the fabric of our cherished society. This downward spiral will only become worse unless and until financial security is restored to the working class.
——-
Currently, the financial incentives in our economic system are upside down. Corporations are incentivized to push down compensation and benefits of their workers. Holding down workforce expenses leads to greater profitability at the top. This workforce suppression is the central cause of the modern trend toward extreme inequality.
All of the current financial incentives are aimed in the wrong direction and produce the wrong results. There are no financial incentives for those at the top to enrich their workers. Only to exploit the workers. It is no wonder that we now have drastic inequality throughout society.
By implementing an inequality tax, however, corporate executives and shareholders would suddenly have a powerful financial incentive to not exploit their workers. For the first time, they would face a financial penalty themselves for extracting too much out of their workers.
Corporate executives and shareholders would always bear in mind that if they do not share enough profits with their workers but instead concentrate the profits at the top for themselves, then this will come back to bite them. They would risk triggering the inequality tax upon themselves.
The decision faced by corporate boardrooms would be whether to share, say, 50% of their profits with their workers, or incur a 70% inequality tax.
To avoid the dreaded inequality tax, corporations throughout the nation would suddenly spring into action and devise all sorts of new measures to share more wealth with the workers. We would see innovation after innovation, one after the next, in company after company. Workers would suddenly enjoy increased wages, greater benefits and enhanced workplace environments.
WTF SRSLY?
Fucking incentives- how do they work (in the world outside this guy’s head)?
If “inequality” is leading to some sort of virulent and destructive populism, I’d say it’s far-left, not far-right.
Income inequality is raging out of control.
Like it’s super roided up and ready to rumble
So, we should strike to make the poor poorer so long as the rich are less rich?
I’m okay with our poor being richer than the vast majority of history, and the modern world, thank you very much.
It’s better to be equally miserable than objectively better off but not as well off as your neighbor.
Thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s ox.
beyond the stupid argument, this article is just poor writing. It is annoyingly repetitive. And 0 attempt to justify the claims.
Trying to Justify claims opens you up to having your claims questioned. Better to just continuously assert the veracity of your claims.
Arguments for socialism are simple and obvious. Everyone who has dealt with a toddler who wants a piece of candy, or doesn’t want to take their bath has heard them all.
“But I WANT to watch Scooby-Doo!”
“True, true, you raise a good point…OK, you can always go to school some other day. Scooby-Doo it is!”
Tell me how that differs fundamentally from the $15 minimum wage argument.
citations are racist.
Depending on the claim not necessarily citations but something a vague explanation of why that is
Citations are the product of traditionally cishetero white male institutions of privilege.
Most company’s labor cost is far higher than their profit.
Far far far higher
The exception might be some data/technology companies.
“A market-based solution”
*snort*
Uh, didn’t Trump get outspent first by Jeb and later by Hillary? How exactly does that support this claim that “big money” is responsible for the current strain of right-wing populism?
God commies are tiresome. They really really want companies to move out of the country and leave natives unemployed.
Nonsense democratic workers councils will solve any problem
Indeed. “Workers councils”, perhaps organized into some kind of United Workers Council Socialist Republic.
Currently, the financial incentives in our economic system are upside down.
Only if you completely ignore the incentives necessary for capital formation. Without which we would still be scratching for grubs in the mud.
All of the current financial incentives are aimed in the wrong direction and produce the wrong results. There are no financial incentives for those at the top to enrich their workers. Only to exploit the workers.
Only somebody who has never held a position of responsibility in a company could write this. Companies agonize over retention and turnover, and go to great lengths, not to “exploit” their workers, but to “satisfy” them.
It also requires a child’s view of the economy, where companies apparently all sit around a big table and decide how little they will pay their workers, rather than competing for workers.
Corporate executives and shareholders would always bear in mind that if they do not share enough profits with their workers
Again, a child’s view of the economy. Profits are what is left after workers get paid. Workers have the first, not the last, claim on a company’s revenues. Shareholders are literally last in line.
To be fair, some incentives in the modern world are fucked up. But this is due to government not what the lefties imagine. Stupid regulations make incentives to manipulate regulations for profit not to make good products. The financial system is all sorts of fucked up. But there is still plenty incentive to create. Could be better though. Just not in the way these people think. We all know the ills of the system, and that a accurate diagnosys is needed to have a chance at a cure
OT: Liberty Doll talks guns.
Fun twitter thread startiong from our favorite commie comic artist
https://mobile.twitter.com/ne0liberal/status/1188843298267582465
Oh, I just [sarc]love[/sarc] days like today. I’ve spent most of it arguing with a technician who either doesn’t know how to or doesn’t want to do the same sort of change for prod as was done in dev. He doesn’t answer the question of “how do we get there from here” or “what do we need to do to get this moving again”, instead throwing out some netpick that doesn’t fit with the fact that the exact same thing has already been done once. So I’m stuck dragging management into the discussion, which involves explaining to management what’s going on and why it’s stalled without throwing blame around. Of course I can’t let this drop, because we were supposed to have finished rollout to the users by thursday, and we can’t start because production doesn’t work without his groups’ work being done.
In the good all days you could have these people flogged
netpick
Perfect.
Unintentional… but fitting.
You can always tell people who work in government IT. It seems like a good third of the job is dealing with people who are spending all their time and effort finding ways to not do their jobs.
Animal – where do you rate the M&P340 snub in this genealogy? I had one of those suckers and LOVED it, especially for concealed carry.
Would fit unobtrusively in the front pocket of a pair of comfortable jeans. Firing it with hydra shoks hurt, however.
I’ve never fired one, so it’s hard to say. I’ve heard good things about them.
I have a model 29 nickle 6.5″ from 1973 and I love it. I’ve never felt a more perfect handgun in my hand. Every word I’ve ever read about early smiths has been glowing in it’s praise.
I just spent my whole afternoon trying to get my work email functional again on my Iphone. The company I work for uses a real shitty device manager from the last decade. I seemed to lost all ability to access my email just after the latest IOS was released. I didn’t update to the IOS, but my system stopped working. I had to unistall the email manager software, update the IOS so i could access the apps store to re-down load the email manager, spend 1 hour with downloads, then screwing around with OCRs, keys, and installs of the device management software. 3.5 hours later I can now start my afternoon.
Gurrr!!!
For the probably minimal demographic of Glibs who are a.) interested in video games, b.) about simulating a medieval dynasty, c.) who don’t already own it, Crusader Kings II is now free to play on Steam. It doesn’t include any of the DLC that most people agree makes the game much, much better, but the base game itself is apparently free until the sequel comes out.