Profiles in Toxic Masculinity, Part 8
Appearances Can Be Deceiving
The young fellow to the right doesn’t look like anything special, does he? A young man probably away from home for the first time, looking a little uncomfortable in his uniform, looking a little apprehensive about what lies ahead.
I have a pretty good idea what that feels like, having been in much the same situation myself.
But this young man, while he may well have felt the way I have described when he posed for this photo, ended up being something else entirely. This is the young Ernest Hemingway, one of America’s greatest novelists, an adventurer, outdoorsman and bon vivant, winner of a Pulitzer Prize and the Nobel Prize in Literature, one of my personal literary heroes and today’s Profile in Toxic Masculinity.
His Maculate Origin
Ernest Miller Hemingway was born to Clarence Edmonds and Grace Hall Hemingway in Oak Park, Illinois, on July 21, 1899. Named for his paternal grandfather, young Ernest attended school in Oak Park, excelling in boxing, track, football and water polo. He also took a journalism class and worked with the newspaper of his school, the River Forest High School.
As a youth, Hemingway spent summers with his family in their vacation home near Petoskey, Michigan. The home was called Windemere, and it was located on Walloon Lake. This setting was to have great influence on the young man and would become the location for many of his later works, especially the semi-autobiographical Nick Adams stories. In this setting he grew to love fishing, camping and hunting, which avocations he would pursue throughout his life.
I’ve been to Walloon Lake. It’s a rather idyllic setting, even today; a quiet, medium-sized lake surrounded by the deep pine woods of the north. I would have liked to have spent more time there; it reminded me of the Boundary Waters canoe area, where I spent some time myself as a young man. On that same trip Mrs. Animal and I went up to Petoskey, where I drank a beer seated on a barstool that Hemingway reportedly occupied regularly as a young man.
From such humble beginnings came one of America’s greatest writers.
Hemingway wrote of those early days often, both literally and in his semi-autobiographical Nick Adams stories; in Fathers and Sons he describes an early encounter with an Indian girl named Trudy:
“Could you say she did first what no one has ever done better and mention plump brown legs, flat belly, hard little breasts, well-holding arms, quick searching tongue, the flat eyes, the good taste of mouth, the uncomfortably, tightly, sweetly, moistly, lovely, tightly, achingly, fully, finally, unendingly, never-endingly, never-to-endingly, suddenly ended, the great bird flown like an owl in the twilight, only it daylight in the woods and hemlock needles stuck against your belly.”
But Michigan wouldn’t contain the young Hemingway for long. While the environs of Michigan had ample opportunities for hunting, fishing and screwing Indian girls, all things the young Hemingway enjoyed, there was a larger world out there for the exploring.
His Adventurous Career
After graduating high school, the young Hemingway went to work for the Kansas City Star. That newspaper at the time had a brief style guide:
- Use short sentences.
- Use short paragraphs.
- Use vigorous English.
- Be positive.
It was this writing style that would characterize his work for the rest of his life.
Come 1918, with America’s entry into the Great War, young Ernest attempted to volunteer. He went in turn to the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, but was turned down due to poor eyesight.
Determined to get into action, in 1918 Hemingway answered an advertisement and ended up as a Red Cross ambulance driver on the Italian front. He arrived in Paris as the city was under bombardment from German artillery and moved quickly on to Italy, where one of his first tasks was removing body parts of civilian workers after a Milan munitions factory explosion, which incident he later described in Death in the Afternoon.
On July 8th, Hemingway was hit in the legs by mortar fragments. Despite his wound he refused immediate evacuation, instead moving to assist injured Italian soldiers to safety, for which action he was given the Italian Silver Medal of Bravery.
He was eighteen years old at the time.
Later, Hemingway again used his avatar of Nick Adams to describe his own return home in one of the best outdoor stories ever written. The Big Two-Hearted River, interestingly, does not take place on the Lower Peninsula’s Two-Hearted River but rather on the You-Pee’s Fox River north of the town of Seney; one of my bucket list items is to fish that same stretch of river. In that story Hemingway describes Nick’s first night in camp:
“Out through the front of the tent he watched the glow of the fire when the night wind blew on it. It was a quiet night. The swamp was perfectly quiet. Nick stretched under the blanket comfortably. A mosquito hummed close to his ear. Nick sat up and lit a match. The mosquito was on the canvas, over his head. Nick moved the match quickly up to it. The mosquito made a satisfactory hiss in the flame. The match went out. Nick lay down again under the blankets. He turned on his side and shut his eyes. He was sleepy. He felt sleep coming. He curled up under the blanket and went to sleep.”
After the war Hemingway accepted a position with the Toronto Star Weekly, where he met and started a romance with his roommate’s cousin, Hadley Richardson. In time, the two married and relocated to Paris, which this time wasn’t under fire from German artillery. During the Paris years Hemingway hung around with several other well-known literary and artistic figures, such as F. Scott Fitzgerald, Gertrude Stein, Ezra Pound, James Joyce and Pablo Picasso. It was from this period that arose a famous and yet apocryphal exchange between Fitzgerald and Hemingway in which Fitzgerald observed, “…the very rich, they are different than you and I,” to which Hemingway supposedly replied, “Yes, they have more money.” His first son Jack (nicknamed “Bumby,” because why not) was born in 1923 and became father to some of Hemingway’s most famous descendants, the actors and models Margot and Mariel Hemingway.
It was during this time in Europe that Hemingway first visited Spain, where he became interested in bullfighting; he also published his first successful book, Three Stories and Ten Poems, and his first major novel, The Sun Also Rises.
In 1927 Hemingway published his third work, Men Without Women, divorced his first wife Hadley, married his second wife Pauline Pfeiffer, and moved to Key West, Florida. He announced that thereafter he would never again live in a big city, which he never did.
For the next ten years Hemingway split his time between Key West in the winters and Wyoming in the summer. He described in Wyoming “the most beautiful country I’ve seen in the American West,” and spent a considerable amount of time fishing and hunting deer, elk and bear.
In this time, he wrote such works as A Farewell to Arms, Death in the Afternoon and The Green Hills of Africa, among others. With his wife Pauline, he embarked on an extensive African safari in 1933, which yielded much of the background for that latter book.
In 1937, Hemingway covered the Spanish Civil War for the North American Newspaper Alliance. After that he sailed his yacht, the Pilar, to Cuba, where he lived for some time in the Hotel Ambos Mundos. While in Cuba he was inspired (somehow) by a woman named Martha Gellhorn to write his most famous work, For Whom the Bell Tolls, of which book I have a first edition on my bookshelf. This work, on publication, sold a half-million copies within the first year and resulted in Hemingway’s nomination for a Pulitzer prize. His success did not translate into his personal life, however; in 1939 he divorced second wife Pauline and married Martha Gellhorn.
But in 1941, events unfolded that would see Hemingway on some of his greatest adventures.
His One-Man War
Hemingway had been fascinated by war and how men behave in war for most of his life. When the Great War Part Two broke out, he seized the opportunity to see the raw face of war up close and personal.
Traveling to London as a journalist, he flew several missions cross-Channel with the Royal Air Force. His wife Martha was forced to seek passage on a munitions ship to join him, which apparently fazed Hemingway very little. While in London he fell hard for an American correspondent for Time magazine, one Mary Welsh. In 1945 he would finally divorce Martha Gellhorn and marry Mary Walsh, with whom he would spend the rest of his turbulent life.
But before that: In 1944, Hemingway wangled a spot on a ship bound for the Normandy landings. He was not permitted to go ashore until the second day, although he was within sight of the landings for some time aboard the ship Dorothea Dix.
When he finally was allowed ashore, Hemingway attached himself to the 22nd Infantry Regiment, commanded by Colonel Charles Lanham. On the drive to Paris, Hemingway befriended a small band of French partisan fighters in the small village of Rambouillet; he acted, as some of the American infantry claimed later, as their de facto commander until the liberation of Paris. One American infantryman, Paul Fussel, who would later become a well-known author himself, remarked that “…Hemingway got into considerable trouble playing infantry captain to a group of Resistance people that he gathered because a correspondent is not supposed to lead troops, even if he does it well.”
Ernest Hemingway was present at the liberation of Paris. He covered the vicious fighting in the Hürtgenwald where the U.S. First Army clashed with Walter Model’s 275th and 353rd infantry divisions. He was present at the Battle of the Bulge until a bout of pneumonia forced his evacuation.
His “leadership” of the French partisans in the summer of 1944 yielded unexpected fruit, as Hemingway was formally charged with a violation of the Geneva Convention for acting as a civilian partisan, but he was acquitted after insisting that he “only provided advice.”
The professionals in the American Army recognized Hemingway for his courage and his knowledge of military matters, and in 1947 he was awarded the Bronze Star for his courage and willingness to come under fire to cover the movements of the troops.
After the war, however, Hemingway’s life took a darker turn.
His Golden Years
After the war Hemingway returned to Cuba. In 1950 an unconsummated affair with the 19-year old Adriana Ivanovich led to Hemingway’s writing and publishing his novel Across the River and Into the Trees, which was not well received; in a fit of pique, Hemingway produced the novella The Old Man and the Sea, which finally netted him the Pulitzer Prize in 1952.
In those post-war years, Hemingway’s life continued to deteriorate. In 1954, during another African safari, he and wife Mary narrowly escaped death in two plane crashes in as many days; these left Hemingway with a severe concussion. Later that year he suffered burns in a brush fire. These injuries resulted in the author increasingly turning to alcohol.
In October 1954 Hemingway received the Nobel Prize in Literature, about which he remarked that “…Writing, at its best, is a lonely life. Organizations for writers palliate the writer’s loneliness for I doubt they improve his writing. He grows in public stature as he sheds his loneliness and often his work deteriorates. For he does his work alone and if he is a good enough writer he must face eternity, or the lack of it, each day.”
This loneliness may have been one of the demons that plagued him in his final years. He moved to his home in Ketchum, Idaho, where he compiled his observations of Paris into the novel A Moveable Feast. He grew increasingly paranoid, thinking that the FBI was monitoring him (they were.) In 1960 he underwent electroshock therapy in the Mayo Clinic, which did little good, and finally, in April of 1961, Hemingway took his favorite shotgun, a 12-gauge double (possibly a Browning Superposed, but that bit is unclear), from the safe and shot himself.
In A Farewell to Arms, Hemingway wrote: The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong in the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry.
Unfortunately, Hemingway was one of the ones the world killed.
He was an interesting man; he faced German bullets with great courage and produced many works of literature that are still regarded as some of the best in American literature. But his own life was a train wreck; he could find happiness neither in marriage nor in his work. Success in a chosen field, obviously, is not a panacea. If we learn nothing else from the life of Ernest Hemingway, we can learn that.
His Bibliography
Below are all of Hemingway’s works (some, obviously, were published posthumously.) I’ve read most of them and enjoyed them all.
Fiction Books
- (1926) The Torrents of Spring
- (1926) The Sun Also Rises
- (1929) A Farewell to Arms
- (1937) To Have and Have Not
- (1940) For Whom the Bell Tolls
- (1950) Across the River and into the Trees
- (1952) The Old Man and the Sea
- (1970) Islands in the Stream
- (1986) The Garden of Eden
- (1999) True at First Light
Nonfiction Books
- (1932) Death in the Afternoon
- (1935) Green Hills of Africa
- (1962) Hemingway, The Wild Years
- (1964) A Moveable Feast
- (1967) By-Line: Ernest Hemingway
- (1970) Ernest Hemingway: Cub Reporter
- (1985) The Dangerous Summer
- (1985) Dateline: Toronto
- (2005) Under Kilimanjaro
Short Story Collections
- (1923) Three Stories and Ten Poems
- (1925) In Our Time
- (1927) Men Without Women
- (1933) Winner Take Nothing
- (1938) The Fifth Column and the First Forty-Nine Stories
- (1947) The Essential Hemingway
- (1961) The Snows of Kilimanjaro and Other Stories
- (1969) The Fifth Column and Four Stories of the Spanish Civil War
- (1972) The Nick Adams Stories
- (1979) 88 Poems
- (1979) Complete Poems
- (1984) The Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway
- (1987) The Complete Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway
- (1995) The Collected Stories (Everyman’s Library)
- (1999) Hemingway on Writing
- (2000) Hemingway on Fishing
- (2003) Hemingway on Hunting
- (2003) Hemingway on War
- (2008) Hemingway on Paris
Animal, thank you for this. I have to be honest, I bought the 1987 “Complete Short Stories” to see what all the fuss was about him and… well, maybe I was too young for it. I’m going to give some of his longer works a go and see what I think from this side of 50.
I have The Essential Hemingway, I didn’t have much luck on The Sun also Rises… I’m not sure I get the point of it. Haven’t move don to anything else yet.
Read “Death in the Afternoon” if you want to learn way too much about bull fighting. No way such an apologia for the sport could be printed today.
So, the Venatio lives on?
Tangentially related:
https://news.artnet.com/market/rare-set-goya-etchings-french-castle-889112
Old news, but it warmed my heart to see it. Goya Is my favorite classical artist, probably because he bridged the gap between old and modern styles. I have a large art book containing all his Black Paintings and La Tauromaquia etchings I’m fond of perusing from time to time.
I have bullfighting art all over my house.
Brahmins in Boxing Gloves?
Feedlot Angus Sumo.
Bulls playing poker on black velvet. Only the classiest for Mojeaux!
Uffda. That really exists.
Love the subtlety of the card suit brands.
LOL
And OMG it does exist!
So, no bullfighters on black velvet, but that was a running joke in my matador book. Hemingway was also mentioned. More than a few times. Not affectionately.
So un-woke.
I sorta did it. Then again, I’m not widely read.
Death in the Afternoon was a dry read, but I appreciated it when I went to the bullfights in Toledo during the Corpus Christi festival. Observing the people was just as interesting as observing the bullfight. My wife and daughter wanted forced us to leave halfway through, though. It is kind of brutal.
I was in Spain many years ago and had the chance to attend, but I knew how it worked and had no desire to see it.
I grew up on a dairy farm, so I hate cows, but that just seems like pointless suffering for the bull.
The Spanish do not take well to a slow kill, if you ignore what the toreadors and the picadors do. The matador who does not kill quickly gets roundly booed. We were sitting next to the family of one of the matadors whose sword hit the shoulder bone and came out the side of the bull. It was a little awkward in our section of the stands for a while.
I tried a number of times when I was young and stupid (I was never particularly young or stupid). What I remember of it then was that it might be a better read when I’m older. Haven’t tried since then though.
I was going to say the same about Old Man and the Sea. Man, that bored the shit out of 9th grade or whatever me.
I use to love Hemingway when I was younger. Then I started to read other, less celebrated, authors and now I’m “meh” on his stuff.
Good write-up. Oak Park (colloquially known as “The People’s Republic of Oak Park”) is the quintessential “upper income white progressive” town, surrounded by Chicago neighborhood of Austin to the east and the suburb of Maywood to the West (both impoverished and both overwhelmingly African American), where diversity is important in theory, but not appreciated in practice. I’ve often wondered how long it would take before the woke people of Oak Park “cancelled” Hemingway, whose boyhood home remains a fixture in their downtown area.
Also, one quibble, I believe the high school he attended was called “Oak Park- River Forest High School” and not just “the River Forest High School.”
I may be wrong, because it may have been called “River Forest High School” in Hemingway’s day, but I don’t think that’s the case as the high school is shared between the towns of River Forest (old money) and Oak Park (white liberal money), hence the name.
Very enjoyable write-up
That is a great quote.
was every little thing he wrote thoroughly vetted to be non-problematic?
You laugh, but I actually had a progressive tell me once that Hemingway should be banned from school reading lists, because he was a misogynist. I laughed in his face, but I sincerely thought he was joking. He did not appreciate that response and then went on to sing Kurt Vonnegut’s praises, which allowed me to discount his opinion.
Vonnegut has that one book, but let’s be honest, that’s about it.
The Sirens of Titan?
Oh, you’re cheeky
No, animal farm, right?
Thing 1’s new charter classical-education academy has both Huck Finn *and* Tom Sawyer on the shelf. and no magic marker blacking out “igger” anywhere to be seen in either one.
Way to trigger people.
They do use an abridged Sherlock Holmes book. I’m not sure which stories are included, but I’m willing to bet they leave out the helthful use of the 7% solution by our plucky protagonist.
Sherlock Holmes? I constantly disliked those books because the conclusion was always some ass pull that was not presented to the reader at the time, preventing us from figuring it out before the detective. There were only two exceptions I can recall where the clue was in the story at the time of discovery, and those were short works.
You are just holding a grudge because they turned out not to be real ghost doges.
Naw, I saw enough scooby doo long before I read those books.
Agreed, there is too much “ass pull” in the Sherlock Holmes. And, Doyle really screwed up “The Adventure of Silver Blaze”, with an irrelevant, senseless ending.
“classical-education academy”
Nice.
There is one chain of private schools in the Midwest that just opened up two schools near me and I am envious of the curriculum that kids there are receiving.
His first day is today, but everything I’m seeing so far makes me optimistic. Hearing some of the testimonials from the progressive Becky mom’s yesterday was funny.
(it has a focus on patriotism and the American Narrative) “I wasn’t sure about the whole patriotism thing, but after seeing it for a year with my kid, it turns out the founding fathers are pretty great!”
(it leases space in a church) “I really didn’t know what to think about the building, but it turns out its OK.”
My wife and I rolled our eyes so hard they almost fell out, but if you can convince two credentialed, stupid white women from MN’s equivalent of Oak Park that patriotism and churches aren’t going to literally set their kids on fire, they must be doing something right.
And their cirriculum is great. Its all planned and rationalized. Their principal is a teacher. The use Direct Instruction for reading (which is one of the only school interventions that seems to buck the Null Hypothesis) and they have a “We will never, ever, ever use Everyday Math” segment on their meet-and-greet material. I sat in on an art class, and they were doing art history (the evolution from French Realism to French Impressionism), not, you know, making paper-mache ash-trays or whatever it was my kid was doing at the same time in his government school.
And also, I’ve been able to halt “Operation: Your School’s Reading List Is Shit and We Are Going To Read Great Books Together” and institute “Operation: Learn Python” instead.
So it goes.
*narrows gaze*
*
Best of his work: The Old Man and the Sea. Hands down. There are a lot of life lessons in that, even if it was written out of bitterness. The bitterness was well earned.
I don’t think I’ve read anything by Hemingway.
Hemingway. Oh, Hemingway. I have a love/hate relationship with Hemingway.
I find his writing dry and boring. I find his life fascinating.
Same feeling.
Thanks Animal!
#metoo That statement perfectly sums up my feelings as well. I DID however, enjoy the Hell out of this article. Great work, yet again; thanks, Animal.
The IG report is out, no big shockers. They couldn’t prove anyone acted with bias. Of course when you work in the deep state you don’t talk about your bias, so the likelihood of proving it is slim to none. Media will spin it while ignoring the report points out that the FBI is grossly incompetent at the very least. Nothing will come of this and the government will continue to grow more corrupt.
did i imagine the news that Strzok altered Flynn’s 302?
Perfect example right there of what LJW is talking about. 302 forms have all the veracity of uncorroborated scribblings and should be inadmissible, particularly in this day and age of A/V recordings.
From what I’ve read, they did determine that the FBI lied to the FISA court and relied entirely on the Steele Dossier to get their Carter Page warrants. And that some FBI officials altered documents presented to the FISA courts.
If they lied to the FISA court, why isn’t someone typing up an indictment?
That’s a good question and I really don’t know or understand how that whole process works. I can’t think of a single time anyone in the intelligence community has ever been held accountable for anything. In the 70’s we learned that the FBI and CIA had a plan to bomb major American cities and blame the Cubans and literally no one faced consequences for that.
Considering that the bulk of the corporate press got the Russia story unbelievably wrong it was always a crazy pipe dream to believe that the IG Report would somehow provide a reckoning when it is in the best of interest of those who report the news to not report the news on a topic that exposes them at being unimaginably terrible at their supposed job.
Now people hold out hope for the Durham investigation that supposedly is preparing criminal referrals, but again I think that’s crazy to expect.
I’m sure it is because they are all riding dirty. Everyone knows that if you dig up one skeleton, the guy is going to start squealing about all the other shit that was going on.
Pretty soon, it will become apparent that everyone who went to the “right” prep school and college were no better than those of us rubes who went to some state university and then what would happen? Anarchy! Chaos!
Without our betters to rule us, we’d soon devolve into some Mad Max like dystopia.
Agreed. And that’s what frustrates me about conservatives who have suddenly realized that the FBI and CIA may be bad actors- this is nothing compared to what else we know they’ve done. This is no doubt bad and disturbing as it’s pretty clear that the intelligence community was heavily involved in a coup to overthrow the elected president, but this is from the same people who armed ISIS, pondered bombing American cities as a false flag, illegally monitored and harassed civil right leaders, and studied the impact of chemical warfare by purposely infecting Americans with infectious disease.
This isn’t political so much as it is a continuation of an elite caste. They genuinely believe they are better than you and do not value your life.
This is why I can’t get my tin-foil screwed on nice and tight like the rest of you. If the Deep State is so ingrained and so powerful and unaccountable, that they can lie cheat and steal, break laws ,policy, and procedure at will and nothing will ever happen to them, why haven’t they just offed Trump all ready?
why haven’t they just offed Trump all ready?
How do you know they haven’t?
*Tightens Tin Foil More*
Because they are still bureaucrats at heart, and have been very successful so far at hamstringing him and #resisting him doing bureaucrat things. Killing him would be taking an order of magnitude more risk, and that’s not their bag.
They aren’t as brazen as you make them out to be. They put a lot of effort into obfuscating and covering up what they do – that’s what a lot of the lying and perjury is for. They obviously don’t believe that there is no possibility whatsoever of consequences.
How do you know they haven’t?
You just know somebody has a website or a subreddit or something claiming that Trump has been replaced with a doppelganger.
Why would you “off” someone when you can just overthrow them? They save the killings for their overseas operations.
If you’re having a hard time believing that the intelligence community is above the law, remember that Clapper lied to Congress on three separate occasions and never faced any consequences for that. Roger Stone was sentenced to jail for lying to Congress about an immaterial point.
Don’t take my word for it, those Trump lovers at The Nation and The Intercept were calling bullshit on this conspiracy from the get go. Not to mention that ever libertarian publication, other than Koch outfits, never bought this to begin with.
If the Deep State is so ingrained and so powerful and unaccountable, that they can lie cheat and steal, break laws ,policy, and procedure at will and nothing will ever happen to them,
But perhaps as a semi-serious reply to the point: Why don’t cops rob banks if they know they can get away with killing innocent people? I think the answer to that question will be the same.
Cops genuinely don’t believe what they do is wrong. They are in a bubble of their profession and so they don’t think they can get a pass. It just turns out that they do. I tend to stray away from a lot of “conspiracy” theories, though in this case a lot of the members of the FBI have admitted to some form of conspiring (Andre McCabe, Comey etc). But in their mind they were doing the right thing.
I don’t think they have convinced themselves that assassinating Trump is “The right thing”.
They couldn’t prove anyone acted with bias.
I’m sure they applied the same standards and analysis that the feds do when investigating claims of racial discrimination.
Haven’t read it, but I suspect it boils down to “nobody wrote down in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump, and nobody said under oath in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump”. All those statements about how they hated him, in connection with all the things that they did that are not standard operating procedure, well, just ignore all that.
Pretty much what I expected. Horowitz is a deep stater, who sees his remit as protecting the agency.
Of course when you work in the deep state you don’t talk about your bias,
The hell they don’t.
From what I’ve read, it’s basically as you say – Horowitz repeatedly identifies problems and then just basically throws up his hands and says
“Whoops, our bad!” Nothing was coordinated, nothing was deliberate, it was just all a bunch of sloppy work by honest people.
Ok, it was ineptitude. Fire all of them.
Nothing was coordinated, nothing was deliberate, it was just all a bunch of sloppy work by honest people that just all happened to push a particular project forward in ways that were violations of law, policy, or standard operating procedure.
Its origin and purposes, a total mystery.
AoS highlighted this quote from the report:
We also found the quantity of omissions and inaccuracies in the applications
and the obvious errors in the Woods Procedures deeply concerning. Although we
did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the
part of the case agents who assisted in preparing the applications, or the agents
and supervisors who performed the Woods Procedures, we also did not receive
satisfactory explanations for the errors or missing information….
In the absence of someone writing “We’re intentionally doing this to screw Trump” in an official memo, Horowitz seems to be fine with shrugging his shoulders.
Although we
did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct
Yup. Only the government is allowed to get away with “Well we didn’t mean to break the law”
It’s the Catiline conspiracy all over again.
I will take my victory lap now. Because that adds up to: it boils down to “nobody wrote down in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump, and nobody said under oath in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump”.
The feds are perfectly willing to infer intent from facts and circumstances everywhere else (as does everyone, and there’s nothing wrong with it). But magically, the combination of statements of animus against someone, and taking wrongful action detrimental to that person, don’t add up to “intentional misconduct”.
“nobody wrote down in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump, and nobody said under oath in so many words that they did X because they were biased against Trump”.
And yet they use the inverse logic to get Trump’s executive orders overturned in court.
Well you see the courts are different than the IG.
You’re not suggesting that the FBI should be taken to court…
Look you little pricks. You wanted an investigation into the FBI and they had an investigation. Now get back to venerating them like you are supposed to.
It’s been DEBUNKED!
de. bunked.
Republicans say the FBI improperly used the unverified dossier to win court approval for its wiretap on Carter Page’s communications, arguing that agents failed to disclose that Steele’s work was being paid for in part by lawyers for Clinton.
But copies of the wiretap surveillance applications show the FBI did disclose to judges that Steele sought information to “discredit” Trump. And the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of Trump was launched after the FBI learned that another campaign aide, George Papadopoulos, boasted to an Australian diplomat that Russia had offered the Trump campaign damaging information about Clinton.
DEBUNKED. They used the file but disclosed that it was to discredit Trump. Also LIke They didn’t start investigating till they heard Russia had offered bad juju on Hillary, which is totally different than opposition research.
The whole article is like that, they spin it so they can claim DEBUNKED, but I don’t know how they can write that with a straight face.
The one that bothers me the most is them trying to gaslight everyone into thinking that Ukraine didn’t help Clinton.
They write that, because the shame is on them too. Our corporate press went with a half-brained conspiracy theory because She lost and now it’s pretty obvious that they did a terrible job reporting on that conspiracy as most of it was built on a flimsy house of cards. The only conclusion you can draw is that (a) they are absolutely terrible at their jobs or (b) they are too partisan to be believed. Neither conclusion is good for them.
Propogandists. And not even very good at it.
I like Hemingway a lot. I also like Faulkner a lot too.
It is interesting to read some of their stuff together. Trying to transition from 5 page stream of consciousness thought to short terse prose is interesting.
When I first read “Old Man and the Sea”, I had just finished “A Tale of Two Cities”. I sung his praises after having to slog through Dickens.
Yeah, I’m with you there. Dickens has never written anything I thought was great. I also never got the appeal of Shakespeare.
I find Ole Bill from Stratford upon Avon amusing in that he was largely making prolefeed yet gets such high praise from academia.
The best popular culture from one generation is the next generation’s high art. Just look at opera. Or 95% of Greco-Roman literature.
The ‘real’ Shakespeare isn’t that guy. The academics got it wrong – taking what was obviously intended to be a pen-name literally – and they refuse to ever admit they fucked that one up. Shakespeare was really Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford: and he was brilliant. I still love Shakespeare.
There’s a reason Hollywood is still doing remakes of “Romeo and Juliet” and “Henry V” centuries later. It really was that good.
How many explosions were in either of those two plays? NONE!
Any production with no explosions cannot be considered as a top tier drama. (both are also noticeably short in the CGI department as well).
Personally I’d rather watch an Ernest marathon before I sat through a production of Romeo and Juliet. (know what I mean, Vern?)
I seem to remember explosions in the Kenneth Branaugh version.
There was that engineer hoist on his own petard, but the explosion was only mentioned, not acted out.
Bardolatry – an amusing pastime. Its been awhile since I checked in to see how this rather contentious matter has been treated recently.
I enjoy the hell out of Great Expectations – more than anything by those other two.
Was that the one with the crazy old lady (with a wedding cake covered in spiders) training some young chippy to blue-ball the protagonist? One of the better pieces of dreck we were spoon-fed in high school. A Separate Peace, however, can fuck right off and die in a fire. It was the only book we were forced to read that was worse than that abhorrent Steinbeck’s products.
Dickens was paid by the word.
I know, I know. But, still, Christ man get on with it. How important is it for him to describe a woman knitting for pages on end?
It affected his paycheck, therefore EXTREMELY important.
If given a choice between debtors’ prison and having to write such mind numbing prose without purpose, one would expect a true artist to choose debtors’ prison.
To be fair, Mark Twain did the same thing with Huck Finn. There are two chapters that completely depart from the story that his publisher insisted he include.
Is that real?
My first thought is that it’s a joke to explain the loong descriptions in his books.
Sorry, had to be done. ?
That immediately made me think of George R. R. Martin.
I think this was discussed in the links this morning.
But this includes a photo of a tour group moments before they became vaporware.
A group of visitors (circled) could be seen inside the crater before images went dark
Personally, I enjoy Hemingway’s terse style. I’m not big into flowery prose or meandering, verbose sentences. Reading Faulker in high school made me want to gouge my eyeballs out of my skull.
I’m generally the same way – just tell me what the fuck happened.
… Although I do enjoy Dickens, so that’s a bit of an anomaly.
Gee I wonder why there are so many people who believe in massive conspiracies these days?
I’ve actually never read any Hemingway.
My father (whom I loathed until the day he died) was no fan of Hemingway either, but enjoyed the works of Robert Ruark (particularly the novel Something of Value), whom he referred to as “Hemingway for people who want more Africa in their life.” That copy of Something of Value still awaits me on The Bookshelf of Shame (where my good intentions get, uh, shelved, pardon the pun).
Ruark wrote some fine stuff. Should you decide to dig into his work, try The Old Man and the Boy or Horn of the Hunter. IMHO, both good reads.
Sorry to go off topic. Good article again, Animal.
I stumbled upon this interesting history not too long ago about a time when Chicago street gangs carried business cards (they called them “compliment cards”) and passed them out to friends and enemies so people knew what areas their gangs claimed. Not only that, but street gangs also use to wear varsity sweaters to represent their gang.
Compliment cards and varsity sweaters faded away from the Chicago’s gang scene in the early 90’s.
Check out some of the pictures.
https://www.vintag.es/2012/01/chicago-gang-calling-cards-from-70s-and.html
https://news.wttw.com/2017/05/18/sweaters-and-other-strange-ephemera-chicago-s-1970s-street-gangs
Some real scholars there.
Gang banger are renowned for their elegant language and witty repertoire
Sweet art skills, too.
Apostrophe policer’s triggered.
I know. I fucked up after I posted.
NEVER’ APOLLOGIZE
I thought you might be referencing this: “faded away from the Chicago’s gang scene” in which the article “the” can either be lost or the possessive apostrophe could be left out if the article “the” remains.
Oh, no. I missed that. I meant on the cards themselves.
No one is intrigued by the fact that one of Chicago’s biggest gangs up until the mid-90’s was called “The Gaylords”?
See, another example of ending a legal prohibition ending violence. Once Chicago legalized Same-Sex Marriage the gang had no power.
That was a genius response. I tip my hat
They were known for putting their enemies in open boxes?
Ref: https://blog.containerexchanger.com/the-gaylord-box-everything-you-need-to-know/
Was their motto “Always got my buddy’s back”?
I knew a guy back in the late eighties that inherited a bunch of dough, so he opened a store called “mayhem” it sold prison art and various bits of criminal gear like handcuff keys, tattoos plastic cups, real stingers you could use to boil water, etc. It lasted about a year.
That’s one way to blow a bunch of money.
Fun article, Animal. I haven’t read much Hemingway, although I enjoyed The Old Man and the Sea.
Dudes like him are interesting to me. Leading a less-than-adventurous life, I really enjoy reading about people who do crazy shit just because.
He sure seemed like an unhappy fucker, though.
His father committed suicide, and that sort of thing runs in families. A story called “Indian Camp” might hint that he thought his father was too easy to push around.
The mother in “Soldier’s Home” was a sort of “off” character as well, and some say this was a swipe at his own mom with whom he didn’t get along.
For a long time, there was a cottage industry of critics psychologizing Hemmingway which distracted people from the quality of his best stuff.
A good book to start with is “In Our Time”, a small volume of collected short stories interspersed with little sketches of incidents during and after WWI, real or made up. Some of these were drawn from his post WWI work for The Toronto Star in Europe.
Thanks, Homple. I’ll check it out.
Now I feel responsible.
You are hereby absolved.
Great article, Animal, as always.
Tried to read him before, but not my thing.
I also did not know about his life being that chaotic, puts a little different spin on his suicide.
The short, happy life of Francis Macomber.
Hemingway changed literature. And lastly for the better. Much of modern naysayers are simply to versed in reading shit like George RR Martin. People rarely challenge themselves literally.
As a side note, many English authors of the period did some fascinating things during WWII. Evenlyn Waugh had the manuscript for Brideshead Revisited airdropped to him in a cave in Yugoslavia, as he was a Royal Commando at the time. He also wrote one of the best WWII novels of all time, Sword of Honor
Err, vastly.
I do remember liking that one in school.
“The short, happy life of Francis Macomber.”
Probably his best short story
I remember Hills Like White Elephants being pretty good, too.
Like Mojo, Im more a fan of Hemingway’s life than his writing. But I enjoy it enough.
Having always been a fan, 1 year an ex (OG-1X-OG) and I spent Christmas in Key West. Not only did I get shit-faced drunk in Hemingway’s favorite bar, but got bounced out for starting a 60+ person conga-line, and generally behaving like an asshole. Good times.
My father has a long story about his trip to Sloppy Joe’s. He went to have a Cuba Libre because he likes rum and Hemingway. (The story involves shitty service and him getting lippy with the bar tender).
I have to admit, that when I was an underaged drinker, the Cuba Libre was the first drink I ordered in a new bar. It was just obscure enough that it made you look like a sophisticated drinker and not some punk kid.
Man, when I was in school Rum and Coke was probably the most common cocktail for underage drinkers.
I remember schnapps being overrepresented in our underage consumption.
I dont remember calling rum and Cokes by any other name when I was younger either.
I don’t hear many people talking about what is really going on regarding Trump. Everyone seems to be lost in the weeds.
I will say it again – We are, in a sense, two countries. One really, but it is useful to speak of it as two. The people, their culture, their values, the ideals we are founded on constitute America. That is the real country. The govt apparatus might be thought of as a second country existing inside the first. The economy it operates on is a looters economy, a throwback to pre-industrial times. They survive by treating the rest of us like cattle. They think of us as cattle and it is impossible for them to think of us otherwise. They think of themselves as a kind of warrior/elite/ruler class.
The kerfuffle we are seeing is not really about Trump, it is about a threat to this so-called elite’s hold on power. They see Trump as a threat to that power and they will burn the country to the ground rather than cede power. They are even saying it out loud and have been, but for different reasons, for the last decade. Hell, Trump is not even really a serious threat to their position like I would be. I like what he is doing on the whole but it is weak tea in my view and look how they are behaving.
It is gonna get worse before it gets better.
Sad but true, Trump is not going for any real change, but this is how they react.
What chance would Ron Paul in his prime, or even Rand Paul have?
I guess we should be happy with some of Trump’s judges and then keep watching the ratchet tighten.
Jesse Ventura learned very quickly that trying to turn government around wasn’t going to happen. The two party system needs each other and won’t tolerate an outsider. Intentions and voters be damned.
Agreed, Suthen. I think Trump’s threat is simply that he’s gotten people to talk about taboo subjects and question the validity of the managerial state.
He is the outside agitator that stirred up trouble among the peons. Trump somehow goaded Our Betters into ripping off their masks and stomping them into the ground. They hate him for that.
The govt apparatus might be thought of as a second country existing inside the first.
I would expand that to include the corporate media and the entire education apparat, from pre-K through post-grad.
It is gonna get worse before it gets better.
Yeah, next year’s election promises to be an epic crapstorm. And that’s just the next chapter. The one after that is the deep state doubling down on #resistance (if Trump wins) or making damn sure nobody they don’t approve of can ever win another election (if the Dems win).
I did include the fourth estate in my mind, though I didnt say it. As for academia, they have been co-opted by the collectivists and incorporated into the authoritarian fold.
There is a lot of undoing to be done. Academia is the logical place too start.
We have a sickness in our government. I was just reading the initial reports about the Inspector General’s investigation.
https://apnews.com/a734c40d142c8950f57ad4c8f8af565c
The IG found that the spying on Carter Page was AOK because they thought the Russian Government was targeting him for recruitment.
This is where we are. The government finds out that a foreign spy agency might be targeting a junior employee for recruitment. So their reaction is to begin tapping his phones and trying to set him up for process crimes so they can arrest him and charge him and use that as leverage to get him to testify against his superiors.
How can they not see that this is insane? I can even see tapping his phones – but that’s not all they did. They went digging to charge him – because they thought the Russians might be targeting him for recruitment. And when they didn’t find anything, then they started trying to set him up. Not “entrapment” even, just create process crimes out of thin air so they could have something to hold over him.
That’s not the kind of government I want. And I cannot believe that nobody else sees it that way.
IG Report also says that they lied to the FISA courts to get warrants for Carter Page, but “Watchdog report: FBI’s Russia probe justified, no bias found” is definitely the smart takeaway.
I fully expect the usual suspects who definitely care about liberty and individual rights just not when orange man is the principal to “whatabout” on the FBI lying to FISA courts much like they are doing now that Schiff subpoenaed the phone records of a journalist and member of Congress. Very on brand for Kochatarians.
Durham’s response was basically “I disagree with some of your conclusions, because I have information from people who aren’t current government employees.”
We won’t see any headliners (Comey, McCabe, etc.) charged, but if Durham isn’t just talking out his ass (and he is a career fedsec) then he is signalling that there will be indictments.
I doubt the indictment part. Once again, I refer you to James Clapper who lied to Congress on three separate occasions and then somehow when Trump eliminated his access to intelligence reports after he’d retired this became an example of “orange man bad”.
Remember this gem?
https://reason.com/2018/07/24/rand-paul-encourages-trump-to-attack-sec/
“Rand Paul Encourages Trump to Attack Security Clearances of Government Critics”
Security Clearances are a Right and property. It was a taking for the government to take that away.
People really need to start distinguishing between “libertines” and “libertarians”. The former doesn’t care about small government or individual rights, despite frequently masquerading as the latter. And you will never find a bigger supporter of the intelligence community and our foreign policy establishment than the libertines employed by the Kochs
Has anyone every been charged with perjury for lying to Congress under oath? I can’t think of anyone offhand.
Roger Stone?
Roger Stone was convicted of lying to Congress on a matter immaterial to the investigation and witness tampering
Duh. I knew that.
Never mind that those ex-employees keep their clearances so they can be consulted by their former colleagues, and not to leak shit to the press.
Didn’t click through, BTW. I deny them my clicky essence.
Libertarians, my ass.
Everything you typed would make sense if it wasn’t for the Orange Man Bad exception.
Look Cyto. I think you need to go out and get some air. Worrying about being an a police state is just too much conspiracy theorizing.
(Pay no mind to the wall being constructed)
(Granted if i had to flee the country, apparently Mexico is not a welcome place for [[[us]]])