The Twentieth Century
The Keith Revolution
Elmer Keith’s contributions to the development of the modern revolver/cartridge combination cannot be overstated.
Born in 1899 in Missouri but raised in Montana, Keith cut his teeth on the single-action Colt but early on became a proponent of the swing-out cylinder double-action revolver. His advocacy of double-action sixguns began with the 1908 introduction of the Smith & Wesson First Model New Century, the “Triple Lock” and its .44 Special cartridge, but his impact on the handgun world didn’t stop there.
A eulogy of Elmer Keith could easily take up a six-part series unto itself, but we can summarize. His work with heavy revolver loads led to the Keith-type semi-wadcutter with its characteristic convex shoulder and 70% emplat; the Keith SWC cuts a clean hole in paper while its hard alloy composition allows the bullet to be driven at high enough velocities to give good penetration on big game. This I can vouch for from personal experience.
Keith’s heavy loads were the basis for the modern magnum revolver cartridges we know so well. In the late Twenties and early Thirties, Keith, dissatisfied with the anemic performance of the standard 158-grain RNL .38 Special load, experimented with heavy .38 loads with 180 and 200-grain SWC bullets in the big Smith & Wesson N-frame “38-44” revolvers. These loads, after discussion with Remington and Smith & Wesson, led to the .357 Magnum cartridge. Likewise, Keith’s heavy .44 Special loads in the Triple Lock and 1950 Target revolvers led him to pester Smith & Wesson and Remington until, in 1955, they introduced the .44 Remington Magnum and the Smith & Wesson Model 29 to handle it. Keith was also instrumental in the development of the excellent but less successful .41 Magnum.
While Remington and Smith & Wesson were listening to Keith, the folks at Colt were a little less prescient. Colt had discontinued the famous Single Action Army revolver in 1941 and re-introduced it in 1955, but the latest SAA guns were built to pretty much the same pattern as the original black-powder Colts; Keith advised Colt to update their fine old gun’s lockwork and sights, but Colt left the SAA as was – which didn’t stop Keith from collecting and using many examples of this fine old gun.
Smith & Wesson historian Roy Jinks referred to Keith as the father of big-bore handgunning, and that’s a title that is well deserved. And speaking of Smith & Wesson:
Smith & Wesson Ascendant
Smith & Wesson’s 20th century successes began with the Triple Lock, but they sure didn’t end there. A string of revolver and cartridge designs were about to make Smith & Wesson the gun builder to watch.
The constraints of the format here won’t allow me to describe all the revolvers Smith & Wesson brought out in the 20th century. So, instead of attempting that, I’ll describe a few of Smith & Wesson’s standouts.
The K-22 Masterpiece. Later relabeled the Model 17 Masterpiece, the K-frame .22 is one of the best double-action revolvers available for folks just learning the art. It’s the same frame and much the same weight as many of Smith’s .38 and .357 offerings while retaining the low recoil and economy of a .22 – it’s also a great sidearm for taking the occasional squirrel, rabbit or mountain grouse. It was also offered in stainless steel as the Model 617.
The Combat Magnum/Model 19. Developed at the request of gun writer and lawman Bill Jordan for a medium-frame .357, the Combat Magnum was a lighter, handier version of Smith & Wesson’s original N-frame .357, the Registered Magnum/Model 27. While no less than George Patton favored the Registered Magnum – he often carried a pair of them he referred to as his “killing guns” – may highway patrolmen, Border Patrol officers and local cops preferred the lighter version. The Model 19 also has a stainless-steel version, the Model 66.
We already mentioned the Model 29, developed at the urging of Elmer Keith and made an icon of popular culture by Clint Eastwood in the Dirty Harry features. While Detective Callahan described the .44 Magnum as “the most powerful handgun in the world,” the .44 Magnum only nominally held that title, as the 1957 .454 Casull outstripped it but was only available (then) in custom-shop jobs, and later developments far outweighed the .44 Magnum. But for quite a few years it was the most powerful handgun cartridge offered in mass-produced revolvers suitable for all-day holster carry, and that’s what made the .44 Magnum as popular as it remains today.
Any discussion of Smith & Wesson revolvers should not neglect the .38 Hand Ejector/Military and Police/Victory Model/Model 10, not necessarily because if was groundbreaking or iconic in design – it wasn’t – but because it was damn near ubiquitous in police departments for much of the century. For some years I had a pre-war .38 Hand Ejector that still carried markings for the Lake County, Colorado Sheriff’s Department; it had the thin 6” barrel, and I referred to it as my “Barney Fife revolver.” It was an unremarkable piece but, like most mid-century Smiths, solid and reliable.
My very favorite holster gun for outdoors is a late 20th century Smith & Wesson. The 25-5 uses the same N frame as the .44 Magnum Model 29, but is chambered for the grand old .45 Colt, which cartridge I have been loading since the early Eighties. My example was made in the mid-Seventies, has a target hammer and trigger and the rather rare 4” barrel. It’s a fine piece, easy to handle and accurate.
Throughout the Depression, WW2 and the post-war years, Smith & Wesson largely dominated the sixgun market, but that doesn’t mean Colt was just sitting around.
Colt Reacts
Colt still managed to hit a home run in the 20th century: The Python.
Colt’s 20th century story is dominated by one sidearm, although not a revolver: The Colt/Browning 1911 automatic. But Colt still was in the revolver business, not only with the famed single actions but also with their double -action guns based on the original 1889 design. While Colt brought out such fine pieces as the Official Police, the Police Positive and the Officer’s Target on that basic frame, the Python was the culmination. A hand-fitted, polished gun, you won’t find a more beautiful revolver than an original Python in the Colt Royal Blue finish.
Back in the Eighties my friend Dave had a 6” blue Python he used to compete in bowling pin shoots. I tried it a few times myself at the pin shoots. The Python’s slick, smooth double-action pull made it almost ridiculously easy to wipe five bowling pins off a table in a big hurry; a lot of those pin shooters used Pythons for that very reason. Like the 1851 Navy before it, the Python is one of the best-handling sixguns around.
The “Snake” family of Colt revolvers also included include the .38 and .22 caliber Diamondback and the .44 Magnum Anaconda. Colt also offered a lower-priced .357 in the form of the Trooper. Like the reintroduced Single Action Army, all these double-action guns save the Anaconda shared an old frame design and much of their lockwork, which had not changed a great deal since the M1889 model; this led to an opening by one of America’s new generation of gun designers.
The New Guy – Bill Ruger
While Colt wasn’t listening to Elmer Keith’s calls for a modern single-action, someone else was.
Bill Ruger’s entry into the handgun market was the Ruger Standard, a neat, trim semi-auto vaguely resembling the Luger in form and grip configuration. It was a nice-handling gun, and unlike some autos it had its barrel and receiver attached in a single unit, and the sights firmly mounted on each. It was good enough to attract the attention of my notoriously frugal father, who bought one mail-order (!) around 1955; I still have that old 6” Standard in my handgun safe.
We aren’t here to discuss the Standard, though.
A funny thing happened in the early Fifties. The post-war years led to a return to traditional entertainments; also, the rise of television gave an outlet for that most favored of post-war American entertainments, the Western. The popularity of Westerns led to a quick-draw craze, which led to an increase in demand for traditionally styled single-action revolvers.
During these years Colt’s Single Action Army was a custom shop piece, pricey enough to be out of the reach of plenty of folks. Some replicas were made by Great American and a few other companies, but quality was iffy and the design different little from the 19th century Colt pattern. While Elmer Keith was unable to convince Colt of the need to modernize the single-action revolver, in Bill Ruger he found a more receptive audience. In 1953 Ruger brought out the Single-Six, a .22 caliber single-action revolver, followed in 1955 by the Blackhawk, offered in .357 Magnum and .45 Colt – later in a wider variety of chamberings from .32 H&R to the .480 Ruger. In 1957 a Ruger employee found some discarded .44 Magnum cases on a range frequented by Smith & Wesson engineers, deduced that S&W was bringing out a new cartridge; this resulted in Ruger’s introduction of their single-action .44 Magnum, the Super Blackhawk, right on the heels of Smith & Wesson’s announcement of the Model 29 and the .44 Magnum cartridge.
Ruger’s revolvers were something new: Solid, with a slightly beefier frame than the traditional Colt, and using modern coil springs in the lockwork rather than the more fragile leaf springs used by other makers. They very quickly gained a solid reputation with shooters. While Ruger didn’t introduce a double action revolver until 1977, those guns quickly gained a following as well, but it was the Single-Six, the Blackhawk and the Super Blackhawk that brought the single-action revolver into the modern era. The final variation on that theme was the Ruger Vaquero, which took the strong frame and modern guts of the Blackhawk and outfitted it with the traditional style (including fixed sights) of the traditional Colts; thus, the single-action came full circle, with a traditional style and modern hardware. I have one, a 4 5/8” barreled stainless steel model with ivory polymer grips, and it’s a joy; it handles my heavy .45 Colt loads with aplomb and is light enough at 38 ounces to carry around all day.
And Then This Happened
In 1987 the state of Florida did something unprecedented; they changed their laws on the issue of carrying concealed handguns. Previously, like every other state at that time, Florida’s laws left the issuance of concealed-carry permits up to the discretion of local law enforcement, which meant that in many jurisdictions it was impossible to get such a permit unless you were wealthy, well-connected or both. Under the new law, assuming you passed a background check and a class, law enforcement was prohibited from denying one a permit; this was to lead to an explosion of such new laws changing the process from “may-issue” to “shall-issue.”
The dawn of the 21st century saw most states with liberalized concealed-carry laws, and this had changed the emphasis of gun designers. Where the bulk of the 20th century’s target markets for handgun builders were hunters, ranchers and outdoorsmen of every stripe, the new focus was on the concealed-carry market. The demand was for smaller, lighter revolvers that still packed enough punch for self-defense use.
But there was another, contradictory trend that began in the late 20th century, and that was the advent of the “monster” revolver. These two trends, along with the remaining traditional holster gun market, would finalize the present state of the six-gun; we’ll look at that in Part 6, when we wrap up the History of The Six-gun.
Older Elmer Keith looks like he could deliver some good ol’ homespun wisdom… and then shoot you square between the eyes.
Could and would. He has a whole chapter on gun fighting in his classic work “Sixguns.” Well worth a read.
Looks like my Grandpa. Veteran of the U.S Cavalry, thrown in the brig for desertion and selling a shit-load of army Colts off-base. I wish I’d asked some questions when he was still with us.
Take note: the action and handling of the Colt Python is nice but they made a boneheaded mistake. The forcing cones on them are too hard and tend to crack. Mine is cracked and I need to replace the barrel. Anybody have a spare 6″ Python barrel laying around you need to unload? Some years back Midway USA got their hands on a bunch and sold them for 80 bucks each. Five minutes after they went up for sale I tried to buy one and they were already sold out. Well, five minutes might be an exaggeration…it could have been six.
If you have a python examine the forcing cone carefully in good light with a glass. Having the barrel fly off of it whn you shoot is no fun.
In case you missed it in the last thread, I bow before your courageous actions, Suthen.
Thank you Festus but there is no need for a libertarian to bow. It all happened so fast I didn’t have time to think about it so I am not sure it can be called courage. It just happened. In spite of the evidence I like to think it is what most people would do.
Yeah, it just happens that way. What are you gonna do? Stand around like a moron or take action? I’d like to think that people like you and I are what survivable situations are all about.
My brother is a civil engineer that works for a steel company. You think guns are dangerous? Moving steel beams around makes guns look like romper room toys. He has been present for several industrial accidents. He tells me that in his estimation really only about one in ten people can keep their heads when the shit hits the fan. Most freeze or fall apart.
It feels nice to be special.
Most freeze or fall apart.
I’m not quite in the freeze category, but I’m close. My brain goes to molasses and the situation is usually over before I can catch up mentally and begin to react. Once I do catch up, I spring into action, but that can take 30 seconds or a minute.
It’s not a fear thing for me (although I’ve never really been in a situation where life and limb were at risk, most harrowing was plucking a drowning kid off the bottom of a pool), it’s an input processing thing. I’m on step 27 of 43 of the “kid is probably choking” mental checklist and my wife has already sprung to action.
If’n ya have to use a magnifying glass to look at yer python, it might not be a python. ;^)
I am loving this series.
Seconded. When I checked back in to see what was new and there was another History of the Six-gun article, my reaction was “hooray!”
Thirded. I usually miss these. I am glad I caught this one.
Fourthed. Dang, I am out of the medals. But knowing more about the history of my beloved Blackhawk is gift enough.
I have a Single Six with the replaceable cylinder for 22 magnum cartridges. It’s a great little gun for dealing with rodents and small game.
There are two of those – Colt and Ruger.
22 long rifle is 0.219 in diameter (caliber). 22 Mag is 0.221. Colt split the difference in the barrel diameter. Ruger made theirs 0.221. If you shoot low powered 22lr in the Ruger you will find the bullet bouncing its way down the barrel causes your accuracy to suffer. Mine will even keyhole at 60 feet. If you use higher powered rounds such as CCI mini-mags the pressure is high enough to expand the base of the bullet enough to engage the rifling and the accuracy will improve greatly. The Colt on the other hand shoots fine with anything you put in it but the pressure on the 22 mags trying to squeeze down the barrel is a bit high. If the gun isnt clean the empties may be a little sticky to get out. Anyone else have a Colt? Don’t dry fire it. The firing pin rides inside of a small insert that inserts in the frame on the inside of the cylinder housing. Dry firing it will drive that little insert forward until it hits the back of the cylinder which will bind it up and make it impossible to rotate and very difficult to get the cylinder out. After you use every curse word there is and have the cylinder out insert a wooden dowel down the barrel and tap it lightly until you have that insert back flush with the frame. I dont know anyone who has done that….just sayin’…..friendly advice.
I’ve always been a bit skeptical of those guns. If you want a .22 WMR, buy a gun dedicated to that cartridge and have done with it.
The LR is fine with the mini-mags but they aren’t cheap ammo.
This is great information. I’ll pass it on to my gf. She has the Ruger.
Interesting. I have the Ruger. That explains the piss poor accuracy with shorts.
Ha! Keith was a blow-hard self promoter, but he was my kind of blow-hard self promoter. My Grandfather met him once. When I found out I got excited to hear the story but all he would say is “He’s a fast talker”. <——- In old parlance that means a bullshit salesman.
Still one of my heroes. There are a million funny stories about the guy.
The one that sticks with me – A reporter showed up at his shop to interview him and noticed a rifle hanging on the wall so he asked about it. It was a Winchester bolt action gun that had been custom chambered in 50 BMG. The reporter got excited and asked if he could shoot it. "Why sure my friend! You certainly can." What a lucky day for the reporter, he was going to be able to tell everyone that had shot the famous Elmer Keith's rifle chambered in 50 BMG! So they took it out back and the guy braced himself. The recoil broke the guys collar bone, rearranged his teeth, rolled his eyes back and put his ass firmly in the dirt.
" My God Elmer, how can you stand that?!" he asked when he recovered his breath.
"Oh hell, I cant. It is just a novelty for conversation. You are the first one to ever shoot it." Keith said.
“A man’s got to know his limitations.”
Tell it to Reader’s Digest!
Elmer also claimed to have shot a deer at 1/2 mile with a .44 Mag. The writer estimated that Elmer would have had to hold something like 44 feet over the deer.
Great story but hunters are a little like fishermen…
Enjoyed your article, love that Model 29 but rarely shoot it. I load down to make it a little easier but still bangs pretty good.
“Great story but hunters are a little like fishermen…” and none more than Keith. Still within the realm of possibility. Go watch some Jerry Miculek videos and become a believer.
For every ten boxes of 44’s I load one will be hot hunting loads and nine will be loaded down to 800 – 850 fps…45 colt range. I find those pleasant enough to shoot.
That’s awesome.
Great stuff Animal!
This is just so good, Animal. In fact, I get annoyed that I have to wait for the next one!
My children are currently hoovering up a lot of my disposable cash, but I have started a revolver fund.
Thanks for doing these.
Yeah, these articles have convinced me I need more revolvers. Currently the only revolver I have is a S&W Model 10.
I had that one. Sold it because I was retarded.
I sold a double barrel shotgun, 16 gauge. Wish I had it back, if only to give away. I have given away several guns, to good homes, because I want someone else to enjoy something that I wasn’t using. Comes a time in every man’s life…
Wait…so you use attack bees now instead?
For socialists the bees leave a little to desire, they seem to believe in private property and self defense.
Somehow sharing isn’t in their vocabulary. When I think about it I’m guessing that’s true for most socialists, especially if they have access to guns.
I have a Stevens 16 gauge side by side that was a gift to the 10 year old me from my great grandfather. If my kids or grandkids don’t want it I will give it to a young shooter as well.
I am going to sell mine too. It’s an expensive and time-consuming endeavor to keep up and I don’t have money, time, or energy to be proficient. Besides which, I am never going to be the badass I wanted to become. I have shifted my focus to becoming a scary crone instead.
I had one too – a pre Model 10 Smith & Wesson, in fact, still bearing the Lake County Sheriff’s Department imprint. It had the old skinny 6″ barrel – I called it my “Barney Fife” gun. File old piece and a good shooter. I traded it off on a Model 586 Smith, which I later sold to my son-in-law. Kind of wish I still had it.
And now I see that this is the very segment in which I described that gun. Go figure.
I have never sold a gun or given one away that I didn’t regret or at least miss. I gave my brother a Smith model 29. He never shoots it despite my urging.
“Hell no man. That is a work of art. I keep it under glass” is his reason.
Then there is the double Stevens 20ga. That one makes me cry. And two Winchester 94’s, but I traded them for a mint Ruger No. 1 in 7mm Rem Mag. I dont regret that as much but wish I could have figured out a way to keep all three.
*wipes tear*
I have all of my Dad’s old guns. Nothing special; the Ruger Standard described here, an old Stevens 520A 12 gauge pump he bought in 1946 when he got home from his WW2 service and the old Mossberg .22 auto rifle Mom bought him for their 3rd anniversary in 1950. None are for sale at any price.
I had left my guns at home when I went away. My folks had their auction and Dad sold his guns but not mine. Fast forward 50 years. Two friends came over to wish me Happy Birthday, I got up to go get the coffee, came back and in my chair was a shipping tube. I opened it and very much to my disbelief was my dad’s Model 141 30 Remington pump. I recognized it immediately because of the weld on the tube under the barrel.
It had been sold to a neighbor at auction, my friends had tracked it down to Montana and bought it back. Open sights but I did manage to kill a crippled deer for one of those 2 guys with it. Friends like that are impossible to beat. Ammo is impossible to get but RCBS makes custom dies once a year and another friend tracked down some new brass so I’m OK. I’m a lucky guy…
Friends like that are like hen’s teeth. I’m happy for you!
Trade the Winchesters for the Ruger. Use the Ruger to get the Winchesters back. Jeez, do I got to do all the big-brains thinking around here or what.
I had an old Sears 12 gauge. Regret selling that one immensely. My .40 , not nearly as much.
“Gimme muh bullet”
Yeah, thinking about a .38 or .357
Cheap revolver -> mugging spree -> better revolver.
Sad trombone for those of us behind enemy lines.
Hopefully once RBG is gone we will get a SCOTUS that will enforce the 2nd amendment and slap down those states’ anti-gun laws.
Cant happen fast enough. I think they choose the 2A cases carefully. They are afraid to rule on one and have every non-libertarian realize that all of the gun control laws are wildly unconstitutional…in other words not laws but violations of the law.
Once they decided Heller, they haven’t heard any significant gun rights cases if I am remembering correctly.
They have refused to take up a couple, which seems odd because the cases conflicted with Heller and also were conflicts between circuits that SCOTUS would normally resolve. But I think Suthen is right, they don’t want to upset the apple cart too much and clue regular people in.
NRO ran an article extoling the achievements of pro-life efforts over the last forty-some years. If you look only at the political and legislative achievements, it feels pretty slim. But the cultural impact is undeniable: fewer abortions are performed now than they were the year RvW was decided. Abortion won’t be made illegal (nor should it be, imo), it’ll die from cultural attrition.
I think the same is true of gun ownership. The fight isn’t just political and legislative, it’s cultural. Despite having overwhelming command over the cultural heights—academia, media, bureaucracy, just about all of the municipal centers, not to mention the rest of the “right-thinking” world—lefties have gradually been losing the cultural war on gun ownership. It’s unpopular and increasingly untenable.
Not to say there’s nothing to worry about, just that there’s a case for hope.
Oh, and there’s always this niggling little detail: they want to take guns from the people with all the guns.
lefties have gradually been losing the cultural war on gun ownership
I feel like I always see conflicting info on this stuff. Intuition tells me that urban areas would be pro gun control, as would wealthier suburbs, but that poor suburbs and rural areas would be against gun control.
If that dynamic is true, the long term prospects of gun control are very good, as are the long term prospects of the left gaining cultural hegemony.
On the other hand, the legislative progress seems to be all in a direction of gun ownership affirmation.
It’s hard to make sense of it all, IMO.
The left is imploding. Every day that Donnie Two Scoops sits in the Oval Office they become more unhinged and say more things that directly contradict reality. Also, this impeachment thing is them saying not very subtly that they are going to contravene a legitimate election, i.e. your vote doesnt count. They are discrediting themselves more than they know, but then they are mostly useful idiots that cant think.
I think they are going to lose in a big way.
Oh, and now that little skateboard girl Beto is mouthing off about how we need to scrap the constitution and he should be able to wipe his ass with it. I am sure that will end well.
I hope so but I’ve a little more doubt then you. These people loathe Trump and he has half of Congress that hate him in the same vein. He’s riding a runaway horse and everyone is building barb-wire fences.
Gun control is about punishing the out-group. They’d take it more seriously in places like Chicago or Baltimore, and champion Stop & Frisk policies, if they were serious about reducing gun crimes in their own backyards. But they can’t, however effective it might be, because it would mean punishing primarily poor minorities. That doesn’t play well with minority voters or (imo more importantly) upper-crust white progressives, who want to pretend that getting cousin-fuckers in red states to give up their guns will solve problems nationally, or at the very least, punish them for voting Republican.
What, given that policy prescription, can they really sell to their voters? They won’t do anything in their own neighborhoods to curtail gun violence. All they can do is ban certain styles of sporting rifles and preen for the cameras. Inevitably, they’re cutting into their own ranks of left-leaning gun owners to appease the hardcore progressive left, and doing nothing for people actually affected by gun crimes.
people actually affected by gun crimes
Oh, and telling those people, “Hey, just take the hits, lay back and think of our gun-free utopia, idiots.
All they need to do, and are doing with the cover of the MSM, is moving the Overton window towards gun control. Is repealing national background checks (a recent infringement) on the table? How about the GCA or NFA? No, all of those are supported by the establishment Republicans as well. Only crazy nutjobs would be in favor of that.
You are exactly right. I try to encourage gun ownership any time I meet someone who doesnt have one and offer to take them shooting. I have had a few successes.
So… I have no firearms, but live in an area with several ranges. The only shooting I’ve ever done was some rifles, black powder, and shotguns back when I was in the Boy Scouts, never any pistol work. I’ve been contemplating checking out one of the ranges nearby to see if I need another (possibly) expensive hobby. Any advice, suggestions, red flags?
Take a class.
Sign up at a range.
Rent lots of different pistols.
Expect to be surprised by what you like and don’t like.
Pray that you prefer the less expensive pistols compared to expensive pistols. Don’t fall in love with that 1911 the first day out. Just sayin.
Don’t fall in love with that 1911 the first day out.
Too late. First pistol I ever bought. But mine is 1911 Commander (slightly shorter barrel) and in 9mm. ///blasphemy!
Springfield 1911 EMP 4 in 9mm
Springfield 1911 EMP in 9mm
Sig p938 in 9mm
I won’t be giving you any shade for that choice.
They are afraid to rule correctly because that would overturn decades of jurisprudence and law, which might, to some, appear to be “activist” instead of what it would really be (i.e. a return to following the Federal Constitution and those of several States.)
And logical outcome would be wildly unpopular and politically unsupported outcomes such as allowing released felons to possess firearms.
Wait until after dark, turn your jacket inside out then crawl across the line avoiding the spotlights.
The “freest” place Drake and I could cross over to would be PA…
Animal – I’ve enjoyed this series. Thanks.
Another good article!
The only reason to pull the trigger on a .454 Casull is to prevent a large animal from eating you. And hope the first shot works so you don’t have to pull the trigger again.
It is a great cartridge for a carbine.
I really wish someone would make a sensible Winchester 92 clone for the .454. That would be one hell of a brush rifle for medium game.
A revolver is on the list for acquisition. Probably 3rd in line behind the M1A and some sort of AR-15 variant.
I carry my pistol most days, but I don’t find it very comfortable or easy to conceal. Obviously, a change in holster or carry position would help, but I wonder if the lower profile of a revolver would help, too.
Depending on where you live is Open Carry an option?
Legally, yes. Without being fired? No. I work for a progressive silicon valley company. Not as proggy as FB or the goog, but not cool enough to keep me around if I started open carrying.
That’s one thing that really grinds my gears.
I work on a Navy base, so I can’t carry at work either. If they said I could carry with a permit, that might be the only thing that would push me to get ask permission.
But you’re allowed to post here?! Jeez, have they got their priorities backward.
Anybody want to trade a revolver for a dog? My wife’s dog is this thisclose to being driven 20 miles in any direction and left to fend for himself. He decided that shitting on the carpet was better than getting cold and wet in the snow. That’s 2x today and 6 or 7x since the snow last weekend.
*glares menacingly at dog*
Bad dog.
We had our first real snowfall last week (getting buried tonight).
One of my dogs went outside; pushed her snout into the snow; plowed through it; then flopped onto her back and rolled around in it. Over and over again.
Both of our dogs love the snow.
Both of my big guys love it. When it snows the GSD is constantly demanding to be let out in the yard so he can play in the snow.
We used to have a Malamute. Getting her to come *inside* between October and February was more trouble than it was worth.
Don’t you fucking dare! That pup is just doing what he’s been conditioned to do. Kick your wife or yourself out in the snow for a bit and give your collective head a shake. He’s the dog (stupid) you are the humans (marginally smart).
Taking the longer view, he has never quite been the same since baby trshmnstr came home. The mrs babied her dogs before we had a kid, and the dog was used to the love and attention that all just evaporated one day. Now she’s just annoyed by his pleas for attention.
I’m usually the dog’s defender as of late, but he is trying my patience today.
Dogs are like people. They generally learn to shit on a schedule.
Put the dog in a crate at night. Take the dog from the crate to outdoors in the morning. Don’t let the dog back in until he shits.
As far as the attention problem, work the dog on a schedule. Walk the dog; take obedience classes; take agility classes; anything. Make sure the dog learns there is a regular time in the day when the dog gets attention.
The new dog shit on the bed the second day we had it. Needless to say, her stock dropped to dangerous levels after that.
It’s been better the past few weeks but she is definitely Lady Humungus’s dog. It cowers when I’m around even though I’ve never struck or harmed the poor beast; the joys of having a rescue dog with an unknown past. Most likely abused by a man, as the dawg also distrusts my son for no apparent reason.
What? You dont know? They are psychic. She can read your mind. Don’t believe me? Try going to the kitchen to get a snack for yourself. The dog wont budge.
Next day with exactly the same body language and mannerism, being careful not to look at the dog, go to the kitchen to get the dog a snack…a hot dog or something. When you turn around from the fridge she will be right there wagging her tail.
The damned things are psychic.
Oh yeah, they know. Wifey’s dog is my pal until she comes home and then it’s like I play a game of “Beat the Pup”.
Get some puppy training pads and see if he’ll use them.
Time for a crate. The new dog goes directly from the crate to the great outdoors.
That’s standard operating procedure, but I feel bad for the dog when he has been locked up all day. He’s welcome to roam the house as long as he’s well behaved, which is usually the case.
Ours can roam after the business is done outside. We’re up to maybe 2 hours now where we’ll trust him. At night or if we leave – back in the crate.
My daughter is training her Rotty pup exactly like this.
Crating works.
Also, dogs will typically not shit where they eat. So every time they crap in a new place, feed them in that location the next time. I’ve used that technique successfully on two different dogs.
That however, does not preclude the situation of having a mentally deficient canine, which I have also experienced. They go in the outside kennel.
Great stuff Animal.
Second. Nice article, Animal
Damn, Glibs got talent. And I’m saying this as one of the least talented around here. But y’all know that.
BRING BACK SNP!!!!!
Tell Photoshop to stop sucking. ‘Cause it sucks.
Sorry I’ll get off my ass here soon.
But it sucks,
Cheer up, the AFL season starts in 2 months.
up the DEMONS!!!! Woot!
4th favorites: https://www.ladbrokes.com.au/sports/australian-rules/55108431-afl-futures-premiership/55108431-afl-premiership-2019/
This has them as 2nd favorite: https://tab.ubet.com/sports/australian-rules/afl/afl-futures/afl-season-2019
Also, fuck the Magpies.
Thx. If I could, I’d go with the 8-1 odds, for obvious reasons.
Also, fuck Collingwood. Hope you’re not from Collingwood.
Up here in the great white north they’ll be coming door to door soon enough. I don’t have firearms anymore but that a personal decision.
I have a ’58 Python. It’s a pretty gun. Haven’t taken it out to shoot yet.
See my comment upthread on Pythons. It is kind of important.
I’ll make sure to check it out before firing.
Comment #2.
Every now and then, I open up the Gemini Customs website and think about sending my GP100 off to them.
After a bit of drooling at the pics, the price tag smacks me in the head and I decide “not today”.
Off of the shelf GP100s are pretty good guns.
“After a bit of drooling at the pics, the price tag smacks me in the head and I decide “not today”.
Second.
And now I want some olivewood grips.
Cool/informative article. I, too, like guns, but I am not really in to revolvers. That said, I need one to get one to carry while hiking. I am thinking (because bears) this would do. I know it’s a Taurus, but I’m a basic bitch.
I had a Taurus Tracker in 41 magnum and it was fine other than a bit of a stiff trigger. No need to let gun snobbery make you pay more than you want to.
That sounds good.
Yep. Taurus is objectively better than no gun. Don’t feel shame; I owned a used Sears 12 ga JC Higgins. Loved that gun.
Ouch. Did you the video someone posted the other day of a guy shooting a bear in the head from ten feet with a 12 gauge? It knocked the bear silly. It flopped around for a few seconds and was back on it’s feet and after the guy again. You might want to go with a heavier caliber. dont under estimate how hard all that hair, skin and fat is to penetrate. Most 357s are soft nose bullets and would never make it through. They will open up and stop half way in the fat never mind the muscle or breaking a bone. Hard cast Keith style .44 mags would probably do it.
Having said that I remember seeing a photo somewhere of a guy sporting a shit eating grin with two bears laid out and holding up his lever action 219 Zipper.
I think I asked on this forum once before (still haven’t gotten around to saving for another gun) and .357 was suggested as the largest thing I would likely encounter would be a black bear. And nah I didn’t see the video.
What kind of bear? I’ve never encountered a black bear that showed anywhere near that kind of aggression.
Cimarron makes some bird’s head grip -equipped SAA 1st-gen in .45LC called the Thunderer… I want the charcoal blue in 4.5″ barrel. Those are sweet shooters, can handle full black powder loads, and made by Pietto or some such. PSA: carry 5 with the hammer on the empty, as these are true spec with the firing pin on the hammer.
Beach Bum is that a 69 super bee?
1968 Plymouth Satellite, trunk, grille, and hood from a 69 road runner, engine is 440 6 barrel from a 71 Road Runner that got rebuilt to 69.5 specs, though we dropped compression to 9.5:1 so I can use pump gas
LOL!
Great article, reminds me I need to take my Ruger 45 colt out for a spin.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/01/european-union-mcdonalds-big-mac-trademark-supermacs.html
The European Union just canceled McDonald’s trademark for Big Macs. Wait, what?
McD’s fails to provide evidence to a bunch of European regulators that the do, in fact, sell Big Macs in Europe.
Le Big Mac
It’s LA Big Mac and Royal with Cheese.
+1 Royale with cheese
Some judge didn’t get the bribe he was expecting.
Tarik, my pseudonymous friend and former podcast partner, had a legal-realist rule about litigation: The judge decides who the asshole is and works backward from there. So who was the asshole here? It was either Supermac’s: a local Irish fast-food chain (with a fair amount of purely coincidental menu overlap with McD’s) founded by an Irishman whose name, naturally, starts with “Mc.” Or it’s McDonald’s: a multibillion-dollar American bully that presented a defense the examiners decided could be reduced to Duh. We’re McDonald’s and had also been applying for trademarks on Supermac’s menu items. We can conclude what the EUIPO thought.
Me Too!
But mine’s a pup of barely more than two Evans old (1965).
It’s a freaking scalpel. I love it, except that the mag release keeps ripping my thumbnail off.
Gotta love Elmer Keith! Don’t hear much about the .44 Special load these days. .45 Colt is on my toy list. DA. Maybe Redhawk. I have a few .45 acps so I can shoot that ammo out of a .45 Colt as well with moonclips.