It was John Browning’s Industry, Everyone Else Just Worked in It
The Winchester/Browning guns
John Browning’s first design from Winchester was a world-beater. The famed Ogden gun builder dumped the toggle-link action that originated with the Henry and instead designed a locking-block lever action, producing what was finally an American express rifle, a repeater capable of handling the most powerful cartridges of the late black-powder era. This was the 1886 Winchester, originally offered in the popular .45-70 Government, the .45-90 Winchester Center Fire (WCF) and the steamrolling .50-110 Winchester.
At a stroke, then, Winchester and Browning not only matched Marlin’s .45-70 Model 1881 but surpassed it in the power stakes by offering not only the more powerful .45-90 but the big .50 buffalo gun cartridge. The 1886 was later offered in the .40-82 WCF, .40-65 WCF, .38-56 WCF,.40-70 WCF, .38-70 WCF and finally the smokeless-powder .33 WCF.
The Winchester 1886 would be made until 1935, when it was redesigned and released as the Model 71, chambered for a new generation of high-performance cartridges. But more importantly, the Browning-designed 1886 and its locking-block action was to form the basis for an entirely new generation of Winchester lever guns.
Remember that neat little pistol-caliber carbine the folks at Marlin brought out in 1889? Turns out that three years later, the Browning-Winchester alliance had brought out a competing product, the great Model 92 Winchester, which was to become seen in countless Western movies and television shows. No less than John Wayne favored the 92 in action—packed Westerns, but outside of Hollywood the 92 found a big following as well. Chambered in the .44-40, .38-40, .32-20 and .25-20 WCF rounds. Later, the .218 Bee cartridge would be offered as well.
The ’92 Winchester was and is (the company that calls itself Winchester today has re-introduced the gun, and many companies make replicas) a light, handy little rifle, slick and fast-handling. It’s something of a minor mystery that the ’92 was never offered in the cartridge that the U.S. Army was using in revolvers at that time, the .45 Colt, but the modern Winchester and replica manufacturers have addressed that need. Cimarron makes a big-loop Winchester 92 replica with a 20” barrel in .45 Colt called the Rio Bravo, and best of all, Cimarron’s version lacks the idiotic add-on “safeties” found on the Rossi and Winchester models. They are neat little things, and one of these days I’ll probably buy one.
Winchester and Browning were far from done. Two years later, the first lever gun to properly be called “America’s Rifle” was introduced.
The 1894 Winchester was a slightly elongated version of the 92, released originally chambered in two black-powder cartridges, the .32-40 WCF and the .38-55 WCF. In 1895 Winchester changed the composition of the steel used in action and barrel and released the ’94 in two new smokeless-powder rounds, the .25-35 and the .30-30. This made the 94 Winchester the first repeating rifle to be offered chambered for dedicated smokeless powder cartridges. Finally, in 1899, Winchester also introduced the .32 Winchester Special; it’s a matter of “common wisdom” in the shooting community that the .32’s slower rifling twist and larger bore size was more friendly for black-powder loads and so was intended for hand loaders who had a big store of black powder laying around – or maybe for some stubborn holdouts who thought this newfangled smokeless powder wasn’t really around to stay.
It was with the .30-30 that the Winchester 94 hit its major success. If you mention “Winchester” to most shooters, the ‘94 is the first rifle that will come to mind. The ’94 Winchester in .30-30 is, especially east of the Mississippi, almost synonymous with “deer rifle,” and even today, “.30-30” is damned near synonymous with the Winchester ’94. There are damned few rifle/cartridge combinations better suited to hunting whitetails in thick woods than the fast-handling, agile ’94 chambered for the .30-30. It’s not often a manufacturer hits on such an ideal combination of gun and cartridge.
The ‘94 was so popular, in fact, as to become the first American-made sporting rifle to sell over 7,000,000 copies. The 1,000,000th Model 94 was ceremoniously presented to President Calvin Coolidge; the 1,500,000th copy to President Harry Truman and the 2,000,000th to President Dwight Eisenhower.
The U.S. War Department even bought a quantity of ‘94s during World War 1 and issued them to Army Signal Corps troops stationed in the Pacific Northwest overseeing the harvesting of timber for aircraft. If you can find one of these ‘94s with the Ordnance Corp symbol and “US” stamp, it will command a fancy price from Winchester collectors. In World War 2 the Canadian government bought a number of ‘94s to issue to forces guarding the West Coast against a possible Japanese incursion, thus freeing up the standard Lee-Enfield rifles for Europe-bound troops.
In recent years the fate of the Model 94 has become somewhat mixed, as we’ll discuss in Part 6. But if you can lay hands on a Model 94 Winchester chambered for the .30-30, preferably one made before 1964, you have a world-class timber rifle that will easily handle big whitetails and black bear out to 150 yards or so, and best of all, if you give it even a little care your grandchildren will still be using it for its true and intended purpose.
But only a year after the immortal ’94 burst onto the market, Winchester was to release something different.
In 1895, the final Winchester/Browning lever gun hit the market. The Model 1895 was the first lever-action Winchester designed and produced solely for smokeless powder cartridges; not only that, it was offered chambered in some real powerhouse rounds. Eventually offered in chamberings including the 7.62×54mmR, .303 British, .30-03, .30-06, .35 Winchester, .38-72 Winchester, .40-72 Winchester and .405 Winchester, the 1895 took a step away from what was a piece of Winchester tradition in loading from a box magazine, thus allowing the use of spitzer bullets.
No less a famous – or maybe notorious, depending on who you talk to – sportsman than Theodore Roosevelt favored the ’95, carrying one chambered in the .405 Winchester on outings in North America and Africa. Teddy killed animals up to the caliber of African lions with his “Big Medicine” and often spoke fondly of this new modern lever gun. And like the ’04, the ’95 saw some martial use, as the Russian government bought around 300,000 of them chambered in the 7.62x54R round better known as fodder for the Mosin-Nagant.
So, in the late Nineteenth century and in the opening years of the Twentieth, Winchester truly dominated the lever gun market. But the still weren’t alone. The folks at Savage and Marlin were still patiently cranking out guns.
Savage’s Single-Minded Success
While the original 1895 Savage had been chambered only for the .303 Savage, a proprietary round roughly the equal of the much more popular .30-30 in performance, Savage saw the light quickly. When the 1899 Savage was released, Savage added the .30-30 as well as the .25-35, .32-40 and .38-55 chamberings to the line.
Savage never sold as many guns as Winchester, but they had a latent prize in the 99. It’s beefy, tough action would stand the test of time better than the lighter Winchester guns, as it was better suited for the more powerful smokeless powder cartridges that would be introduced in the early- to mid-Twentieth century. The solid striker-fired Savage, with its signature rotary magazine, cartridge counter and side ejection, would only gain ground as time went on, and the 99 in a wide variety of chamberings is still a common sight in game fields across North America today.
Marlin’s Steady March
During these years Marlin didn’t innovate overly much. The big-bore 1881 was made until 1922. The 1893 and 1894 rifles would continue in production, the 1893 until it was redesigned as the 1936 (later just the 36) and the 1894 and the .22 caliber Model 39 until, well, now.
During these years Marlin seemed content to play second fiddle to Winchester. They sold rifles that were roughly the equivalent to Winchester’s in performance; they were a little cheaper, a little less popular, but they kept Marlin going through to the early Twentieth century, when a key little difference in gun design would begin to give them a slowly-increasing advantage over the 900-pound gorilla in New Haven.
And Then This Happened
In the early years of the Twentieth century, shooters began to see the beginnings of a revolution in sighting equipment. Optical sights – scopes – weren’t really a new thing, having been used to good effect in the Civil War, but the original models were long, cumbersome, heavy and unreliable. But in the early years of the new century, scopes began to become more practical. Improvements in lens-making and in scope bodies would turn the telescopic sight from an expensive novelty to something within the reach of the average shooter. This would tip an advantage away from the company that had dominated the lever-gun market since 1866, as the side-ejecting Marlins and Savages were better suited for scope mounts than the top-ejecting Winchesters.
There was news on the ammo front as well. In 1915, a fellow named Charles Newton (who would by himself be a good subject for a gun article) had been messing around with some groundbreaking bolt guns and designing cartridges for them. In that year he brought out a new cartridge, not a big-bore black-powder thumper but just the opposite; this was a medium-caliber, high-velocity round for the newest smokeless powders that were still coming into the market.
The cartridge came to be known as the .250 Savage or the .250-3000, and it was the first rifle cartridge to break the 3,000 feet per second muzzle velocity level in a factory load.
The .250 Savage was the first but wouldn’t be the last. Gunmakers and shooters were still learning the possibilities of the new smokeless powders. Muzzle velocities and chamber pressures were rising, but American shooters would find gunmakers up to the challenge. Lever guns would be a part of this; as the world moved into the smokeless powder era, old designs would be modified, and new designs would be produced to meet the new ammunition. It was an exciting time to be a shooter. More on this in Part 5.
Fascinating. Watching the innovation unfold is so cool.
Thanks, Animal!
Ditto. This is great. And I am tickled to see there are at least 2 more installments.
Another great history lesson! I’ve learned more from these articles than from all the other stuff I’ve read. Had the ’94 X 2, both 30-30s, one early, one modern cheap looking one. Both killed a lot of deer ’til I settled on the Marlin 336. Thanks for all your efforts, Animal.
In case you are interested the 94’s are being manufactured again only now at a more reasonable price….reasonable as in the company will make money this time instead of a loss. 30-30, 38-55(yes it can handle the 375 winchester) and the 450 Marlin. They even make a take-down.
http://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-94/model-94-current-products.html
Wow. Looked the page over again and apparently they have added 32 special as well.
The .32 Special is a great round for those who think smokeless powder really isn’t here to stay. 😉
I had a 94-22 that I foolishly let go many years ago.
ouch
Over the years I have sold a few guns. The money is long gone and I wish I had every one of the guns back.
I gave mine away, it was the right thing to do to the right people. Now I want them to use them, hopefully with me. I have 3 grand daughters, one is serious about learning to hunt, the other 2 not so much. May be the two can be convinced though, under the right circumstances.
My 12ga O/U is the John Browning 150th Anniversary Edition. That guy was a friggin’ genius.
Great series, Animal. One day I hope to afford a 99 Savage in .308 or .250.
OT:
Michael Avenatti just got indicted in the Southern District of NY for attempted extortion.
And the fucker TWEETED ABOUT HIS EXTORTION.
He demanded $20 million from Nike or he’d do this. Nike called the DOJ and got his threats on tape.
You people don’t understand how happy this makes me. Found out this morning that I need like $2k of house repairs on top of the $10k I just paid for new floors and whatever I’m going to pay to fix the car and I’m happy right now.
Home ownership can be devastating. You seem to be reveling in the good news while not being bothered too much by the bad. Good show, JB.
BTW those are my initials for my first and middle names.
I’m very much bothered by the bad. But this allows me to be happy temporarily.
At least the house will look sweet without the 15 year old carpet that’s more or less destroyed.
I just got a new hot water heater installed. Thankfully not as an emergency installation.
…waits…
He lucky. SEA SMITH not here right now.
He meant just a h̵o̵t̵ water heater, since hot water doesnt need to be heated.
^ this guys gets water ^
Oh my dude, I am so sorry.
After a while my ass just goes numb. I just got through fixing both cars and replacing the ductwork in my house. Wheee. Hopefully, I get at least 8-10 months off. My house has been throwing of $4500-$7000 repair bills annually since I bought it in 2017.
We find ourselves a little numb to it now too.
Welcome to home ownership, brah.
That sucks big time. We are going to pave our driveway this spring and I’m terrified (based on some of the settling of the current driveway) that we are going to find a giant sinkhole that needs filling when digging starts.
Maybe I should try to time it so that I learn about how my garage foundation is teetering on a giant hole on the same day Hilary is finally indicted for corruption.
Make sure and cap the foundation blocks before they install the new driveway. Cheap fucking builders frequently left them open.
Also, sheets of insulation at the threshold really help moderate the heaving.
Oh wait. He’s ALSO been indicted for bank and wire fraud in the Central District of California.
That’s two! TWO INDICTMENTS! Bwa ha ha ha ha.
OMG. That’s too much schadenfreude with Avenatti. This is going to be a fun week.
Sorry about your woes, JB.
Couldn’t have happened to a nicer piece of pond scum.
Stumbled upon his name the other day while reading about Tully’s. That guy leaves a trail of debris worse than a tornado.
Wait, THREE indictments now. LA District Attorney as well!
Pound Avenatti in the ass prison!
Soooooooo
Still running for president?
I lost 14 model 1894’s in a tragic boating accident on the Atchafalaya.
All of the calibers except 25-35 and 444 marlin. I sure with I could find one of the 444’s.
Hopefully the boating accident wasn’t in the deep part of Lost Lake. Stuff lost there will never be found. Lucky to have saved yourself.
I am sorry. I didn’t have the 45 colt either.
That’s what tomorrows are for.
That’s what happened to my HK when I moved to New Jersey.
My uncle (lives in upstate NY, hunts all the time) has a decent collection of antique rifles, including a Model 1899 Savage .303 that’s been in his family since it was new. Need to ask him more about what he has.
Holy crap, really? I bought a batch of ammo from a gun smith that was retiring and ended up with a box of 303 savage.
Yeah. Haven’t seen the collection in like 15 years (haven’t been back to upstate NY since I graduated from Syracuse) but I remember that one at least.
Sort of on topic. My father in law has an old German drilling gun. Only briefly looked at the gun, I’m curious if it was one of few saved after the gun confiscations in 1945. Next time I’m visiting I’ll make sure to take a better look at it and find out more.
The existence of the 32 special and the 30-30 puzzles a lot of people. Thanks Animal for including that bit.
I reload for both. Hold one of each in your palm with the base away from you and you cant tell them apart. I think if they were going to use that case and adapt it for BP they should have gone with 35 caliber. The 32 just isnt enough to make much difference.
Always was a puzzlement. Seems like the 32 is fading off into obscurity. Remington had a 32 so which was first? I couldn’t find 30 Remington ammo or dies. RCBS tools up once a year for special orders, I had to wait nearly a year and $87 later got a set of dies. Then a problem finding brass but a friend found two boxes of 20 at a gun show so I’m good on that, at least.
Did you see my link above?
http://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-94/model-94-current-products.html
They are chambering ’94s in 32 special again
Also, I managed to pick up 140 rounds a while back.
I did see the ad, thanks Suthen. Now I like that Savage 99 too. I’m like a kid in a candy store. If I ever see any 30 Rem ammo or brass I’ll pick some up, too. Now sure why, need to teach the grand daughters how to shoot, if they ever show up..
Guns!
Rev. ALK is over at Reason repeatedly calling everyone “bigoted, uneducated, deplorable clingers” who are “irrelevant to America’s future” while being completely sure of his own self-righteousness. It’s really all he has at this point. I think his mind is broken. He is like Tony, but more determined (but it also may be a parody/troll). Speaking of, I haven’t seen Tony yet. I suspect he is having a cry-sesh with Rachel Maddow while they hug it out and discuss what the talking points/spin needs to be.
And Avenatti get indicted for being a total shyster. I usually hate Mondays, but this week is off to a good start.
I don’t even know who this person is.
Think of the worst trolls on TOS. Only much worse.
Worse than Mary Stack?
Mary Stack is in its own category.
I think he was a handle used by Tulparollo to troll at Volokh.
Weird, I’ve never heard of the person either. When I think of the worst trolls ever at Reason, that conjures up such horrors as:
crayon
White Indian
Mary Stack
shreek AKA Palin’s Buttplug, AKA diajal, AKA all his other deranged socks
Tony
Botard
I’ll give crayon credit though. Back when you didn’t have to register at TOS, he started posting under my posting name and everyone was getting all pissed off at me. I kept saying ‘it’s not me, it’s crayon posting as me!’. That was pretty funny.
So you are admitting he was the sharpest crayon in the box…
He was a full on commie, I mean a true bleever.
Years ago I was fairly sure that Tony was operated by multiple people – back in the more straightforward DNC shill sounding days. The voice was different even though the message was the same.
The problem was that anyone could be any handle there for a long while, so it may have been true that there were multiple people playing the same roles without actual coordination.
That said, I do miss the days when you could don a joke handle for a single post. There’s a whole category of jokes that work so much better if you do it under the fake name instead of writing “/Jim Varney” after the joke. Nowhatuhmean Verne?
He’s a migrant from the Volokh Conspiracy. I remember him from there before Volokh went to WaPo.
I think Alk is a parody.
Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland
Ah, yes. Memories. Yeah, I don’t know if he’s for real. Don’t care.
I lean parody – but it is hard to tell. Sometimes serious discussion, sometimes troll, sometimes shill….
OT: UNEXPECTEDLY.
I blame the Green Deal…
Just the threat global economic meltdown is causing the glaciers to say “not so fast”.
I blame Mueller, Trumputin shill.
Because Obama made the oceans recede. It was just a delayed reaction.
The glacier receded: climate change
The glacier advanced again: climate change
See?
Moar Green dealz???
Needz moar green new deals. Moar and newest, greener, and how with more MOAR!
I’m waiting for the crisis when human activity prevents the globe from doing its natural climate changes.
It isn’t natural when peep Os are involved. There was this garden and everything was perfect. All the animals frolicked gleefully about and the weather never changed. Then one day Peep Os appeared out of nowhere and one of them just whipped out a scary looking AR-15 with a thing that goes up and started spraying bullets around like at one thousand million billion a second and well, then Trump got elected president.
It took a study to come up with common sense obvious result! Who would have thunk biology would assert itself?
Did they control for the gender of the mother?
Okay, that was LMAO.
Bra-VO.
Moms with penises were not asked to participate in this survey?
You sir just won the internet for today. Bravissimo.
Winner. Take a bow Rhywun.
Someone once wrote a book named something like ‘Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus’. And no one freaked the fuck out. Like they would now for sure, because reasons. I guess what I’m saying is, everyone used to just assume men and women are different and accepted that. Regarding whether or not male and female brains are different. I don’t know. Men and women certainly appear to think differently. But how much of that is cultural and how much is biology, no idea. But, if anyone would like for me to do a study proving it one way or the other, just send that sweet funding my way and I’ll get the job done.
A long time ago, I read an article where someone claimed there were more genetic difference between a human male and a human female than between a human male and a chimpanzee male. That “Y” chromosome has a big impact. Or it could have been a woman writer that was pissed at men. I don’t remember. I am so old. 😉
from the sidebar:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6846615/Piers-Morgan-unveils-clip-Mel-B-confessing-sex-Geri-Halliwell.html
I may need to head towards my bunk.
Um… not really.
Is that what you really, really want?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XjUFYxSxDk
I installed Meto Exodus last night, but have not even fired it up yet. Not sure if I’ll do that or continue trying to take out Marseille and finally hand France a total defeat in Civ 6. Oh shit, work are asking me to roll 3 items into production tonight, that’s going to kill an hour or so…
Probably too late to comment, but a great read, thanks Animal.
I’m here late. I like this series.