Lever Guns in the Smokeless Powder Age
The introduction of the new smokeless powders changed everything.
These fancy new propellants developed some hot new performance, but there were some requirements that gunmakers had to adapt to. Chamber pressures were much higher, and while performance was much higher than the old black-powder loads, realizing the most out of that performance required bottlenecked cartridges and spitzer bullets.
Most of the lever guns on the market were physically capable of carrying and chambering the new rifle rounds, at least the shorter ones like the .250 and .300 Savage. But steels adequate for black-powder loads weren’t up to the new levels of pressure, and the idea of having jacketed spitzer bullets lying point-to-primer in tubular magazines gave many shooters a bad case of the williwaws. Some changes in metallurgy and magazines were in order. The 20th century was a very interesting time in lever guns.
Winchester’s Dominance Continues – For a While.
1935 saw the introduction of what may be the best of the traditionally-designed big-bore lever guns. In that year Winchester released the Model 71, a re-engineered Model 1886 lever gun chambered in the new and powerful .348 Winchester. Intended as a Western game rifle, the 71 was a big, powerful gun capable of taking any American big game at extended ranges, but in this
introduction Winchester’s timing was off. This was a niche that even in 1935 was increasingly dominated by bolt guns, and after World War 2 the scoped bolt gun became the overwhelming choice of outdoorsmen who wanted to reach out and touch something. The original 71 was discontinued in 1958.
In 1955 Winchester broke with tradition in offering the lever-action Model 88. This was a different kind of lever gun, as the short-stroke lever operated a rotating bolt with locking lugs at the front, making for a tighter lockup. The ’88 ejected spent cartridges to the side, allowing a solid low scope mount on its solid-top receiver. The new lever gun was striker-fired with no external hammer, making for a faster lock time than older designs. It had a full-length stock and a box magazine and was chambered for two powerful rounds, the .284 Winchester and the .308 Winchester. Here was a truly modern lever gun, referred to by some gun writers as a “bolt gun operated by a lever.” That lever also had something else new; in cycling the action the trigger moved along with the lever, eliminating a common cause of pinched fingers in more traditional lever guns.
The ’88 was joined in 1961 by a semi-auto counterpart, the Model 100. The ’88 didn’t last, only being made until 1973, but one can usually find them for sale on auction sites and the short, handy puncher is still a great hunting rifle.
In the early to mid-20th century the famed and wildly successful Model 94 spawned a few variants. While the 94 was offered in a variety of barrel lengths and in a takedown version, one variant of note even carried a new model number, that being the Model 55 with its 24” barrel and shotgun-style butt. The 55 wasn’t a commercial success and was only made from 1924 to 1932. There was also the Model 64, produced from 1933 through 1957 in 20, 24, and 26 versions, often with a half-length magazine.
Later in the century the post-1964 Winchester made still more changes to the Model 94. The first of these was the introduction of the “Angle-Eject” in 1982, where a cut in the upper right of the receiver allowed ejection of spent cases somewhat more to the side, allowing a scope to be mounted closer to the bore line. The Angel Eject guns were made until 1997. To the somewhat aged and jaded eyes of this shooter, the Angel Eject system screwed up the lines of a beautiful old classic, as did the later addition of a butt-ugly cross-bolt safety. “Big Bore” versions were later offered in the .307 and .356 Winchester rounds (basically rimmed versions of the .308 and .358 Winchester cartridges) and the .375 Winchester, which was sort of a modernized version of the old black-powder .38-55.
In 1972 Winchester capped things off by introducing the 9422, a slick little short-throw lever gun chambered for the .22 Long Rifle. While its overall appearance mimicked the 1894 rifle it was ostensibly named after, there were two key differences: Like most .22 rifles of its day with tube mags, the 9422 loaded from the front through a cutout on the tube. Unlike other Winchester lever guns (except the Model 88) it also ejected spent rounds through the side of the receiver, allowing easy scope mounting on the built-in tip-off grooves. This new gun was also available as the 9422M in the .22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire round.
But while all this was going on, Winchester’s good name was suffering a few setbacks. The biggest change in what is arguably the single most famous American gun company happened in 1964. In that year, rising labor costs forced Winchester to re-engineer their production. This included such steps as eliminating expensive machined forgings for cast and stamped parts; shooters saw a marked decline in fit and finish not only in the company’s flagship lever gun but also in Winchester’s other prominent products, including the Model 70 bolt gun
and the Model 12 pump shotgun. Having owned and handled many examples from both sides of that line, these days I personally won’t own a Winchester rifle or shotgun made after 1964, but I will qualify that by conceding that I am a stubborn, obstreperous, opinionated old coot with a healthy distrust of all things newfangled.
The company continued to bleed sales after that. In 1984 the old New Haven plant which was the genesis of so many iconic American rifles and shotguns was sold by parent corporation Olin to the plant’s employees, who re-organized as the U.S. Repeating Arms Company and continued (under license by Olin) to manufacture Winchester-brand guns, but the writing was on the wall. In 1989 the famous old plant finally closed. That was the end of the New Haven plant, but the Winchester name would manage to hang on through a couple of iterations; we’ll discuss those in Part 6.
But while Winchester was undergoing trials and tribulations, their primary competitor was circling overhead like a giant predatory bird.
Marlin Hits Their Stride
Perhaps a key to Marlin’s success was that they didn’t play around with their designs as much as Winchester. Marlin’s rimfire offering, the Model 39, remains pretty much unchanged since its introduction, save for some differences in fit, finish and sighting equipment. The excellent little pistol-caliber Marlin 94 has remained likewise unchanged since its genesis save the addition of a misguided cross-bolt safety; a key addition was the introduction of a .44 Magnum chambering in 1963, followed later by a short run (less than 5,000) guns in the .41 Magnum, examples of which sell for big bucks nowadays. The Model 93 Marlin morphed into the Model 36 in (of course) 1936 and in 1948 into the 336, which still is in production, albeit again with that stupid cross-bolt safety.
Here’s a hint on these safeties, by the way. I have two Marlin lever guns; one is a fine old 1979 336 in .30-30 which I have had since I was nineteen, a great rifle that I have plunked a fair number of farm country whitetails with and which is a Marlin of the original pattern. My other, though, is the Bullwhacker, an 1895G in .45-70, which I have fitted with better sights, a Burris IER scope and a big lever loop. I love this gun, as it is nearly the ideal thing for handling big, tough critters at close to medium ranges, but the 1895G has that idiot safety; fortunately, I discovered a company that makes a kit to replace these pieces of pettifoggery with a simple straight flush bolt with a flat screw head, greatly improving the gun’s appearance while eliminating the possibility of having the redundant safety in the wrong position when commencing operations.
I won’t counsel anyone to alter a factory-installed safety, of course. I merely mention the availability of such things in the event any of you, like me, see little sense in a manual safety on a gun with an external hammer.
Still, safety or no, the 336 action spawned some neat new stuff.
In 1963 Marlin brought out the .444 Marlin cartridge and introduced the Marlin 444 to shoot it. This ramped up the power level available in Marlin rifles but not without some growing pains; the .444 case was based loosely on the brass .410 shotgun cartridge and was an interesting design, but in 1963 suitable bullets were not much in evidence. Bullets made for pistol cartridges were prone to breaking up when fired at rifle velocities; later better projectiles for the .444 were introduced but the rifle and its eponymous cartridge languished.
In 1972 Marlin addressed this problem in part by bringing out the 1985, again on the 336 action, this time in the popular .45-70 and, as the 1895M, the .450 Marlin, sort of a sawed-off .458 Winchester Magnum. This was a hit; the 1895 gave rise to the 1895G “Guide Gun,” a shorter-barreled, muzzle-braked thumper aimed at the close-quarters, dangerous game market. As mentioned previously, I have one of these, and while it’s great fun, twenty rounds or so off the bench will make you think of maybe picking up a .22 for a while.
While both the 444 and the 1895, like the 336, allow for a scope mounted low on the receiver in the traditional position, the two big-bore versions call for judicious measurement of the eye relief, to prevent possible cases of Kaibab Eye.
The 336 is best known for the .30-30 and .35 Remington chamberings, but other calibers included the .219 Zipper, .307 Winchester, .32-40 WCF, .32 Special, .356 Winchester, .375 Winchester, .38-55 Winchester, .44 Magnum and even the .410 shotgun shell. The gun was sold in the discount Glenfield version, with a stained hardwood stock instead of American walnut, as well as in a couple of store brands. In the final year of the 20th century, Marlin even brought out the 336M in stainless steel.
A big part of Marlin’s success in the 20th century had to do with the increasing use of telescopic sights throughout that century. Marlin capitalized on this, advertising heavily with images of Marlin lever guns bearing optics; by the end of the century, Marlin would surpass Winchester as the nation’s leading manufacturer of lever guns, although that was as much to do with Winchester’s issues as Marlin’s solid-top receivers and steady production.
Marlin had one departure from the traditional lever gun model. In 1955 Marlin brought out the .22 caliber Levermatic, a short-throw, box-magazine fed .22 caliber lever gun. It wasn’t a particularly attractive piece but performed fine and managed to sell reasonably well in the nine years it was produced. In all, not quite 32,000 guns were made.
But while Marlin was beginning to achieve some real dominance in the lever gun market, another old builder was also plugging along, this one with one solid, reliable design.
Savage’s New Power Levels
It is ironic that the only moderately-successful Winchester 88 copied the broad pattern of an older and much more successful rifle: The Savage 99. During the 20th century Savage greatly expanded the 99’s range of chamberings, eventually offering not only the original .303 Savage but also the .32-40 Winchester, .300 Savage, .30-30 Winchester, .25-35 Winchester, .250 Savage, .22 Savage Hi-Power, .22-250 Remington, .243 Winchester, .308 Winchester, .358 Winchester, 7mm-08 Remington, .284 Winchester, .38-55 Winchester, .375 Winchester and the .410 shotgun hull.
For a woods rifle, the tough Savage 99 chambered for the .358 Winchester, maybe the best brush-gun cartridge ever made, is hard to beat. In fact, now I’m trying to think of a reason why I don’t already have one in the rack.
The striker-fired Savage had the solid receiver top that, like the Marlin offerings, allowed the proper mounting of a scope low and centered on the receiver. Unlike the Marlins it was striker-fired, making for a faster lock time and less chance of a wobble between trigger break and primer fire.
Sadly, the great 99 didn’t survive the 20th century, as production ceased in 1998. Savage still makes their 110 bolt gun in a bewildering variety of options, as well as shotguns and (like seemingly everyone else) an AR-15 pattern rifle. But while the fine old 99 is no longer produced, many were made, and the online auction houses always have a good selection. It’s a rifle worth looking into.
Winchester and Savage spent much of the 20th century pushing the more modern line in lever guns, but in the Sixties, a new rifle under an old name was about to take things to the next level.
Browning Enters the Fray
Way back in 1878, the Browning Arms Company was founded by the man Himself to market his non-military arms not built by other manufacturers. In 1969, this Browning Arms Company, manufacturing in the FN works in Belgium, introduced the ultimate lever-action rifle: The Browning Lever Rifle, or BLR.
The BLR, like the Winchester 88 before it, used the lever to operate a bolt-gun-like rotating bolt. Also like the Model 88, the BLR fed from a box magazine and had the pinch-free trigger that moved with the lever. Unlike the Model 88, it used a very smooth geared system that allowed for a short bolt throw, and also came in both short- and long-action versions to enable it to digest a bewildering variety of calibers, including the big belted magnums; in all the BLR was sold chambered for the .22-250 Remington, .223 Remington, .243 Winchester, .257 Roberts, .25-06 Remington, .270 Winchester, .270 Winchester Short Magnum, .284 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, .300 Winchester Magnum, .300 Winchester Short Magnum, .308 Winchester, .325 Winchester Short Magnum, .358 Winchester, .450 Marlin, 7mm Remington Magnum, 7mm Winchester Short Magnum and the 7mm-08 Remington.
Here at last was a fully modern lever gun, capable of long-range accuracy and cartridge power levels rivalling the current bolt guns. Originally built in Belgium, in the mid-Seventies the BLR’s production, along with a bunch of other Browning designs, switched to manufacture at Mikoru in Japan; ironically, fine guns with a famous name were now built in a nation whose nation makes it nearly impossible for the workers in that plant to own the very items they produce. The BLR was revamped some in 1995, including the change from a forged steel receiver to a cast aluminum version. The gun continues in production to this day.
Also in 1969, Browning doubled down by introducing the BL-22, also made in Belgium, a finely crafted, short-throw .22 lever gun. The BL-22, like its big brother, featured side-ejection and a trigger that moved with the neat little short-throw lever. Like most .22 rimfires, the Bl-22 loads through a port in the tube magazine.
Unlike a lot of manufacturers, Browning didn’t treat its rimfire lever gun as the second-tier. The BL-22 was made available in all the various grades of wood and finish as its larger brothers, and in the higher grades commanded a significant price for the time; now, shooters could take some fancy hardware into the woods in squirrel season.
The interesting thing about Browning’s introductions here is the timing. Only five years after shooters were roundly disappointed by the apparent decline in quality of post-1964 Winchester, Browning brings to the table two fully modern lever guns, one firing a wide range of powerful big-game cartridges, the other a finely made graceful rimfire. Browning was clearly going after Winchester’s market share, and that is something that would make the 21st century movements of gun company ownership rather interesting.
Modern is as modern does, but late in the 20th century shooters began to feel the stirrings of nostalgia. That led to some opportunities for new guys.
The Replicators
A detailed discussion of replica lever gun manufacturers would require an article unto themselves, so we’ll have to settle for hitting the high points here.
The popularity of Western movies and the rise of Cowboy Action shooting led to the lever-gun and single-action revolver market’s exploding in the last few decades of the 20th century. It didn’t take long for replica manufacturers to start turning out lever guns.
In the late Seventies, an outfit called Navy Arms started importing guns from a variety of sources. One of those was the Rossi/Braztech clone of the 1892 Winchester, then a neat, affordable little gun. The initial version was pretty much an exact copy of the original Browning design; later, import/export rules required the addition of an external safety, to which Rossi responded by sticking the world’s ugliest firing pin block safety awkwardly on the top of the bolt.
But while Rossi held the lower end of that market, outfits like Uberti, Pedersoli and Cimarron were cranking up to produce some great, high-end replicas. Almost every model from the original Henry to the 1866, 1873, 1876, 1886, 1892 and 1894 Winchesters were eventually represented, along with the 1860 Spencer and the 1883 Colt-Burgess.
And Then This Happened
The modern era kicked in, with its sudden focus on all things Tacticool. The 21st Century saw the genesis of odd things like monster revolver rounds, legitimized wildcat rifle rounds for every conceivable special purpose, and the odd habit of hanging Picatinny rails on every available bit of a gun’s real estate. The 21st also saw an increased hue and cry from the political Left to do something about a few highly-publicized and highly-politicized shootings carried out with semi-auto rifles, and a few localities started restricting those rifles; this suddenly opened some fertile new ground for lever gun manufacturers.
But the 21st century also saw the sale and reorganization of some fine old gun companies, and that wasn’t necessarily to the benefit of shooters.
We’ll talk about all this in Part 6, the final installment of this History of Lever Guns.
Another great article, Animal!
Great stuff, you really sealed the deal with this one, Animal. I was totally unaware of all the calibers available in the Marlin/Savage guns. I was like a latent Bernie Sanders, “why would anyone need………….calibers…………lever actions”. Old people get hung up on a favorite and never stop to smell the fresh roses. Thanks for enlightening all of us. Now I have to wait another week for the finale which I’m anticipating as “Grand”
Lever guns: With some practice you can shoot one as fast as a semi-auto. Keep the gun tight on your shoulder with your left and your eye on the sights. Work the lever and trigger with your right and no fuckin’ around…do it quickly and firmly.
Clearly I posted this comment in the wrong article: Shopping for the grandchildren. It will be a few years before they are ready but…which one?
I am thinking this one – https://www.browning.com/products/firearms/rifles/bl-22/current-production/bl22-micro-midas.html
But this is a strong contender
https://www.browning.com/products/firearms/rifles/t-bolt/current-production/t-bolt-sporter.html
You can’t go wrong with a Browning.
Sure you can, the pervious owner might have had a habit of cleaning with bleach and is trying to sell you a block of rust.
I am buying new. These guns are intended to last them their lifetime and maybe on to their children. They are currently 1 and 3 years old. One boy, one girl.
pervious
A portmanteau of “pervert” and “perfidious”, which would perfectly describe someone who cleaned a gun with bleach.
Hey, DNA man DNA! Bleach and a Rat tail file!
I am looking at at least three guns each by the time they are in HS. A 22 rifle, a shotgun and a rifle capable of harvesting deer.
I am looking at CZ now…their shotguns. I really like a side by side but for the kids I may go with a semi-auto. CZ makes a very nice side by side with multiple gauge options. Very tempting. In the case of semi-auto I may go back and look at the Browning A-5. I am a big Browning fan.
For rifles I have a collection of Winchester 94s.
I’m a big fan of the Remington 1100 platform. Mine are probably as old as I am (they were Pater Dean’s originally), have had thousands of shells put through them, and the only time they have ever failed to feed is when I fucked up reassembling one. The one with a rifled slug barrel can print 3″ groups at 100 yards with the right saboted slugs.
Ya know, you are right. I have two 1100s myself and they are fantastic guns. Hmmmm.
I guess I am partial to the Browning A-5 because my grandfather bought a matching pair for my brother and I when we were 10 and 11. Probably just sentiment. I couldn’t hold onto the damned thing. My father would hold the guns so we didn’t drop them but the recoil would knock the damned thing out of my arms. In spite of that I couldn’t shoot it enough. We would burn through a case of shells in one afternoon.
I bought a Winc 1200 in ’68. Used it a few times, went to 1100s, really, really think they are a far better made gun than the Winc. Luckily I sold the Winc for what I paid for it by financing it with a friend so his wife wouldn’t see it come up on the family budget. I haven’t shot the Rems for close to 30 years and wipe them down every year and put them away. Grand daughters don’t have much interest in them.
I’m quite partial to my Citori’s. And although I had to send it in for some warranty work, my SBE ll has been a solid performer.
I do think for first guns that will last, better price options are definitely available.
I read that as your Clitori’s.
I love Citoris. I have two Citoris…a side by side and an over/under both in 20 gauge. I have had them for 30 years and the only problem I have noticed is a bit of galling on the hinge on the side by side. Maybe they just forgot to temper that part? Seems like an odd problem for something so easy to fix.
My dad has a 20ga Citori that I’ll eventually end up with. Not sure I need a 20ga out here, but it’s a beautiful gun.
You bird hunt. A 20 is plenty of firepower. Put some no.4 shot in that 20. No.4 can really reach out there. 20 gauge is plenty of capability for taking upland birds.
Even with waterfowl the 12 doesnt offer that much advantage as steel shot just doesnt have range.
I have a question for you. I have a Winchester Model 50 manufactured in 1957. Obviously I can’t shoot steel through it but what is your experience with the alternatives, particularly bismuth-tin.
I wouldn’t mind dragging it out again.
The last time I shot bismuth It was Hevi-shot. I could feel the whole gun shiver. It felt way too hot. The shell jambed in the chamber and I had to use my foot to get it to eject.. I have never had factory rounds perform like that before. They were obviously overcharged. I thought maybe my chamber had imperfections but when I shot normal steel and lead rounds it functioned perfectly. They advertise that their rounds have extra punch. God knows no one can claim it is false advertising but bismuth just isnt lead. Even loaded up like that it doesnt hit as hard.
With steel I watched BB shot bounce off of duck feathers at 60 to 70 feet.
In my opinion there is no good alternative to lead shot.
It’s an issue of range and knockdown power. A 40 yard shot is the standard around here. And pheasants don’t kill easily.
I wish someone would make some loads using extra thick plastic wadding so steel could be shot in older guns with softer barrels. It would sacrifice the numbers of pellets a bit but it would be nice to have available.
Francisco, try some number 4 lead shot. You will be surprised how much range it adds over no. 6s. Fewer pellets but a lot more range.
Agreed.
And there is no way in hell I can afford bismuth. I shoot over a case of ammo per season. At $2 per trigger pull that’s a bit pricey.
I have found that the Black Cloud steel to be the best alternative.
Thanks, guys.
I have a swamp gun I can shoot steel through. And I can still use lead for most other things, so I’ll get the Winchester out one of these days.
I go from 7.5s in the early grouse/partridge season (Sep), to 6s when pheasant starts (Oct), to 4s in the late season (Dec). Birds tend to get up farther out as the season progresses. Sometimes I’ll shoot a 6 backed up with a 4.
When Pater Dean was limiting out on quail (15 per day) every day during the very long Texas quail season, he wound up taking a rather elderly side by side .410 just to keep it challenging. He and his buddy (who knew every landowner in North Texas) had access to hundreds of square miles of what was then prime quail country, and shot so much that they would actually trail the birds a hair, or only shoot at birds going away, to minimize the shot in the meat.
I’m an adequate wingshooter, as long as they aren’t flying left to right, but I’m nowhere near that good.
Dean: What’s that? Cant shoot left to right? Why?
I am asking because right to left, straight at me or away I cant miss. Left to right I cant hit shit. What is that? Is it some kind of vision problem? Brain wiring?
I find it frustrating as hell.
Pushing instead of pulling (for righties) the gun
I’m righthanded. I think its not unusual for righties to struggle with left to right wingshots because of the ergonomics – going right to left, you are pushing with your compressed (right) arm and shoulder into into your extended (left) arm, and left to right you are pushing with your extended (left) arm into your compressed (right) arm and shoulder. Going left to right you are pushing against a shoulder that is already somewhat loaded up/compressed.
Empty handed but as if you were holding a shotgun, try swinging each way and see if you feel your right shoulder and upper back compressing and impeding your swing as you come right. That’s what I feel, anyway.
Oh, I’m also iffy on birds coming over me from the front. Thanks for reminding me.
I bought an original SBE back in 92. Used it for everything. Absolutely loved it, until I picked up a Franchi Alcione over under. I had a hard time leaving the SBE home, at first. Felt like I was cheating on my wife. BUT, after a few times out with the Franchi, I had a new love. Much lighter and much faster. Now it’s SBE for waterfowl and the double gun for upland. I guess there’s room for two beautiful Italian women in my life!
I had a new love. Much lighter and much faster.
Still talking about shotguns?
*sigh*
Unfortunately!
CZ makes (imports?) a gorgeous but ridiculously impractical coach gun
As much as I want one, there will always be something higher priority on my spending list.
better pics/video https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/12/jon-wayne-taylor/gun-review-cz-hammer-coach-and-sharptail-side-by-side-shotguns/
as fast as a semi-auto
All I am hearing is that it is time to ban lever-guns.
Fitting OT post on a gun post: Go woke, go broke….
Picatinny rails on every available bit of a gun’s real estate.
You gotta accessorize.
I gotta pay taxes and die. Everything else is optional.
You could skip the former if you’re not terribly concerned about the timetable for experiencing the latter.
I believe Miroku is also producing 94’s these days.
Yes they are. Kinda pricey but worth every penny.
I had a Charles Daly made by Miroku, O/U 20 gauge, circa 1969 , gave it away to my bee partner but I think he only uses it for show and brag.
Are The Swiss Staying Pro-Gun In Anti-Gun Europe?
The EU is going to overplay its hand. I dont expect it to last. There are just too many different tribes in Europe with too much cultural difference.
With the Russians getting more and more bold and the huge influx of immigrants, Europe is FOOKED.
Perhaps the Swiss can help the Brits grow pair.
Also, it would be terribly ironic if we found ourselves in a war to help secure British independence from the EU.
We could at least send them a few advisors or combat fashionistas. If they stop wearing bright red uniforms and bushy hats and wear camo and helmets, they’ll stand a much better chance.
I’d take the British Army’ collection of parade uniforms over what passes for the US Army’s any day of the week.
#makeArmygreenagain
The only context in which Bugs Bunny is funny.
…a bewildering variety of calibers, including the big belted magnums; in all the BLR was sold chambered forthe .22-250 Remington, .223 Remington, .243 Winchester, .257 Roberts, .25-06 Remington, .270 Winchester, .270 Winchester Short Magnum, .284 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, .300 Winchester Magnum, .300 Winchester Short Magnum, .308 Winchester, .325 Winchester Short Magnum, .358 Winchester, .450 Marlin, 7mm Remington Magnum, 7mm Winchester Short Magnum and the 7mm-08 Remington.
Bewildering is right!
Thanks, Animal. I’ve learned a lot in this series.
WHO WANTS CAKE?
Former Republican Sen. Jeff Flake would prefer a Democrat win the 2020 election than have President Donald Trump serve a second term, saying that “four years is difficult enough to unravel some of the damage” done internationally by the administration.
Whatever, dude. Take your meds.
Sorry. We now return you to your regularly scheduled topic.
Surely, he has examples.
Like hell he does. And stop calling him Shirley.
“Trade war” (whatever happened to that?) and “immigration” (without any elaboration) are mentioned in the article.
Former Republican
Correct
They all do
Your comments about which rifles eject to the side reminds me of something that happened a few years (ok, more than a few) ago. When my youngest was about 10 or 12, my mom and step-dad took us up into the mountains near their house to do some shooting. My mom had my grandfather’s .22, and let my daughter use it. My youngest is a southpaw, and the rifle was ejecting the shells right into her arm. She was not happy about this. Fortunately, my mom figured out what the problem was, and gave my daughter her jacket, which solved the problem.
One time when I was out at the range with a few friends I was shooting an AR one of my friends had just built. I’m a lefty, and for some reason, the stars aligned such that every time I fired a round the brass would eject up and across my field of vision, roll across the bill of my ballcap, and land in the hood of my sweatshirt. Every couple of rounds I’d notice a burning sensation on my neck. I looked like I was branded for a week from hot brass almost falling down my shirt.
*nods knowingly*
Pistols aren’t too bad wronghanded, but rifles are varying levels of annoying when shot crossed up.
On my Mossberg MVP, it’s a 5 step process to eject the spent cartridge. Left hand from shooting position to forestock, right hand from forestock to bolt, right hand eject cartridge, right hand from bolt to forestock, left hand from forestock to shooting position.
I reach over with my left hand while keeping my right on the stock. I know that’s frowned upon, but the only bolt gun I’m typically shooting is a Mosin-Nagant using iron sights. I’ve tried using my right hand while shooting from a bench, but it feels awkward.
I’m just curious about the (to me) conspicuous absence of Remington. I thought they were in the same league as Winchester and Marlin?
Because the series is about lever guns.
I didn’t realize Remington doesn’t make lever guns. Interesting. Do you know if there is any special reason for that?
Not a Remington or firearm history guy, but from Wiki it sounds like the commercial market wasn’t a big focus before the end of WWI.They were also co-owned with Winchester in the late 1800 which might have split some of that? Remington was also into ammo manufacturing and seems to have gone into bolt actions straight from breechloaders, more or less.
Could be cost structure as well. Same reason Win 94s went to shit in ’64.
WHY NO ARTICLE ON STEVE SMITH’S LONG GUN? SHOOTS STRAIGHTS. NEVER RUN OUT OF AMMO.
We haven’t reach fully automatic guns yet.
Classified as a Destructive Device under the NFA.
LARGE CALIBER, SO NOT AN “ASSAULT” PENIS, AMIRITE?
Is that the one with the “bayonet” that looks suspiciously like a dildo?
Trench warfare
https://fee.org/articles/antonio-gramsci-the-godfather-of-cultural-marxism/
Not going there to get you links at work, but I have been amused/appalled/intrigued by the plethora of videos on YouTube showing wacky shotgun slugs – all kinds of weird penetrator stuff, and even one that tries to emulate the Abrams tank round with an explosive charge.
I love taofledermaus. Particularly when he got the airsoft pellet up to Mach 5.
I have seen those. They shoot magical kewpie dolls or anything that will fit in a shot shell. A waste of time and effort.
Best, most accurate and effective thing you can shoot out of a shotgun barrel: https://www.midwayusa.com/s?targetLocation=%2F_%2FN-8657%2B4294967259%2B4294918067%3FNp%3D2%26Nr%3DAND%2528p_visible%253A1%252Ccustomertypeid%253A1%2529%26Nrpp%3D24%26Ns%3Dp_metric_sales_velocity%257C1%26Ntpc%3D1%26Ntpr%3D1&userItemsPerPage=48&persistedItemsPerPage=0
They shoot magical kewpie dolls or anything that will fit in a shot shell. A waste of time and effort.
Well, yeah, but its entertaining.
Great series!
Not going there to get you links at work, but I have been amused/appalled/intrigued by the plethora of videos on YouTube showing wacky shotgun slugs – all kinds of weird penetrator stuff, and even one that tries to emulate the Abrams tank round with an explosive charge.
I don’t know bout that, but I was watching some gun nut show one day, and they were talking about hunting with shotgun slugs (probably deer hunting in some place like Pennsylvania) and I was amazed by the accuracy of the ammo they were using.
It is hugely variable. I have a freakishly accurate rifled barrel for my 1100, and it shoots most slugs (saboted or not) into a 12″ circle at 100 yards, with some loads/slugs going bigger. But with the right ones, it can hit 3″ all day. If I had wanted to, I could have won a ton of bets at the range in WI before deer season opened.
Caveat: I’ve never shot slugs through a regular smooth shotgun barrel.
If only someone could have predicted this outcome once they started taking down other statues.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=12043
That’s an easy one.
“Fuck off and find another school.”
Maybe they can go to George Washington University…
GW students vote to ‘remove and replace’ mascot
It’s hard to imagine they could find a replacement mascot that doesn’t offend them. Mascots are racist or cultural appropriation or something. They’ll figure out a way to be offended no matter what is done to try to appease them. Little tyrants is what they are. Their poor parents are likely spending a lot of money to make their kids dumber.
Their new mascot should be the NPC meme dude.
As long as it’s genderless and some color other than white.
Everything that was parody in PCU 25 years ago is deadly serious now.
So much this ^^^^^
54% of those who voted
The morons are motivated.
I notice the demands include a long list of Orwellian thought-policing tactics that would make Stalin proud.
Dear fucking god!
“comprehensive, cultural competency training.”
What the hell does that even mean?
Re-education camp.
Struggle sessions, comrade.
This is a tactical error on their part. You’re supposed to incrementally grab power, not demand the entire playbook at once.
The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting. —Milan Kundera
https://quillette.com/2019/03/31/historical-amnesia-and-kunderas-resistance/
Also see link higher up about Trench Warfare.
“The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was. The world around it will forget even faster.”
“The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history.”
I would say that is exactly what we are seeing from these college students. They want to erase Western history and culture. It’s stupidity beyond belief.
They think they’re going to be the Vanguard. They’re going to be in a ditch in a communist country
I hate Long Island Nazis.
Founding Fathers under attack: Students demand Thomas Jefferson statue removal
Bad Orange Man said that the founders would be next. Extreme irony will be observed when they come after T.J.’s likeness at UVA.
Didn’t they already go after Columbus? So, not a big surprise. They’ll start going after inventors and scientists next, writers, artists, musicians. Anyone who was white will be a target for erasure.
How long before sjw’s invade this?
Dammit who woulda thunk that those who want to purge the CSA because of the slavery will excuse other non-CSA slaveowners?
Also the Confederates were rebellious slaveowners which the Founding Fathers were as well.
Also what about the abolitionist’s attitudes toward the Natives…
They timed their ejaculations.
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/life/allthemoms/2019/03/29/seven-firefighters-wives-expecting-just-months-apart/3315141002/
something something hose
Is this not normal? All of my wife’s friends have had or are having babies right now. Seriously, like 10+ pregnant ladies in our friend group.
18-24 months after kid 1 is prime time for kid 2.
In offices where I have worked, its a standing joke that as soon as one woman gets pregnant, the dominos start falling all over the place. I have a grand total of 4 women in my department now of child-bearing age, and three of them have had kids in the last year and a half.
Happened in our circle to a lesser extent. Usually staggered by a few months, but yeah, once one woman gets pregnant all her friends start thinking about it. Also, especially in our group, they all dread ten months of enforced sobriety, so they all want to time it such that they can go do pregnant lady things together and then all have babies in time to drink margaritas on the beach together.
15 years ago I would have thought this ridiculous.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/02/21/pedophile-project-7-year-old-next-sexual-revolutions-hit-parade/
Now I’m not so sure.
MAPs
https://youtu.be/mfEgDiRe7_I
Skip to 4:00 to get past rant and see her examples
I’m not sure how I’m supposed to feel about her bunny moon bedspread now. Lol.
Yeah, you know, it’s not as far-fetched as I would’ve thought ten years ago. I see this culminating in one of two ways: either the US turns into the UK, with all the madness that entails, or; the blowback from the deplorables and their allies is absolutely legendary. Don’t know which way I’d bet, to be honest. It’s not too far a step from child pageants to child drag shows to normalizing pre-pubescent sexual “exploration” to seeing all the positives in a caring, experienced adult who can be a sexual mentor for children taking their first steps into maturity.
Which reminds me, I need to restock on ammo.
Even if they find it distasteful, the current crop of leftists have no philosophical argument to contest pedophilia. Everything is defined in terms of power and subjectivity, and nothing in terms of morality and objectivity.
Everything is defined in terms of power and subjectivity and personal gratification. Progs/leftists are fundamentally amoral, and only use the language of morality and “outrage” as a tool/rationalization for their anger and envy.
That’s where moral relativism gets you. Although, in truth, it’s not moral relativism, it’s just an inversion of the attitude conservatives have towards the state. Conservatives–as distinguished from classical liberals or libertarians–see the state as a tool to protect and/or enforce moral norms that exist elsewhere. The state itself doesn’t have a moral character in the same way that culture or individual behaviors do. Progressives and the radical statists see the state as the moral end instead, with culture and individual behaviors moral or immoral only so far as they support or hamper the health of the state. That’s why, as a for instance, you have true believers who genuinely believe that if a white person and a non-white person both say something racist about the other only the white person is actually being racist. Racism isn’t the real issue, the white person’s identity as sort of a symbol for a system that prevents a Progressive
or totalitarian state is the issue, so when whitey is racist he’s actually racist, while when not-whitey is racist he’s helping to remove an impediment to the establishment of the correct type of state.
favorite blurb for today, April Fool’s Day:
The group gathered on campus to “expose the culture of bias and discrimination,” as stated in the media advisory, and to demand “the statue of Thomas Jefferson is removed.”
Hofstra College Democrats “want the statue to be removed and [we] stand with the Jefferson Has Gotta Go Campaign,” the group’s president, Brynne Levine, told Campus Reform.
Move to Liberia.
Whose capital Monrovia which is named for a slaveowner?
What is the first thing the freed slaves did when they arrived in Liberia?
Enslave the locals.
Really?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_D._B._King#Forced_labor_and_slavery_scandal
there was also a huge scandal in the 1920s
Dang. That’s juicy. Curious how I have never heard about that before…
The former slaves who colonized Liberia became its ruling class and had rather testy relations with the Native Africans. These tensions helped lead to those civil wars..
was found that forced labor was used for construction of certain public works such as roads in the interior
Oh, for public works? That’s totally ok corvée labor. Not slavery at all.
Yes, really. Think about it. In an pre-industrial society one cannot thrive or prosper on the labor of their own two hands. You have to yoke your fellow man and accumulate the product of many people’s labor.
There is no people that have not enslaved others. There is no people that have not been enslaved at one time or other. No one wanted to be a slave but talk of getting rid of slavery would get you laughed out of the room even by slaves. It was just crazy talk.
People think of slavery as a moral issue. It isnt and never was. It was an economic issue.
There is no people that have not enslaved others.
I don’t disagree. Every one was doing it to every one else for all of history (one reason I laugh at people who suggest I am guilty of something because I am white, I have predominantly Slavic ancestry…). But this Liberian example of former slaves enslaving people is interesting and completely destroys the leftist sjw view of the matter, not that it wasn’t already.
Of course the slave trade would not have happened if the locals did not engage in slavery as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1927_Liberian_general_election
Then you had those civil wars…
Another great entry, thanks Animal!