Thursday Morning Questioning Links

To which state did OMWC’s Mom travel, escorted by his sister?

Does Mom have any idea whose home she is visiting?

Is my name “Honey?”

Am I an exceedingly patient person?

Will I be consuming many gallons of cocktails in the coming weeks?

 

So, what’s happening in the world outside my home? Let’s take a look, shall we?

 

Is there no end of evil in the world?

Who would have ever thought this would happen?

Do you think that they give a shit?

Is this what Dbl Eagle has been up to this week?

Do you think this (hopefully former) officer is still a fan of law enforcement access to DNA databases?

 

Is this where I provide a music link?

 

Comments

536 responses to “Thursday Morning Questioning Links”

  1. Scruffy Nerfherder

    I have a question. Has Eyepiece stopped working for anyone else?

    1. No.

      But then again I was never using it.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      That is not a valid First.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Hey, I stuck with the question theme. That should qualify.

        1. Count Potato

          We should let SP judge.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder

            This vexes me, I’m terribly vexed.

    3. straffinrun

      Not working for me.

    4. The sidebar elements that Eyepiece anchors to have disappeared, thus so did Eyepiece. This has happened in the past after WordPress updates and usually fixes itself in a few hours. If it persists, I’ll have to push a tweak to Eyepiece that anchors it to another element.

      1. l0b0t

        Thanks Trashy. For me, the problem manifested right after an update to Chrome.

        1. I’m seeing the same issue on Firefox, so I think that’s just a cowinkydink.

          1. l0b0t

            It’s still autoloading new comments but no sidebar action.

          2. Dude that just happens when you get old.

    5. Slammer

      I’m using Brave on an Android phone and the up and down to top or bottom of page arrows arent showing up. On the Mac I use Brave and it logged me out and I never ever remember my passwords, so I just use the phone

  2. Do you think that they give a shit?

    I’m going to have to assume that’s a rhetorical question, since the house holds all of America in contempt.

  3. Scruffy Nerfherder

    The women in these videos were flown from around the country to San Diego by Girls Do Porn, to shoot a video that they allegedly were promised no one back home would ever see. The company, many of the women say, told them that the videos would be sold as DVDs to “private collectors” in Australia and New Zealand.

    Not very bright these girls are.

    1. Yep – can’t imagine there is much money selling to “private collectors”.

      1. Technically, the general buying public consists of a great many private collectors.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          I think they are collecting their privates in their hands while watching these videos.

          1. straffinrun

            I always thought privates meant the balls.

          2. That’s a subset.

          3. straffinrun

            You ever see a Venn diagram? No shaft.

          4. Pope Jimbo

            Does that make the shaft the sergeant?

    2. At the rates that would have to be paid by these private collectors for the expenses listed, it’d be more likely to pay for an ‘in-person’ performance.

      1. Not Adahn

        RedHeadRedemption did bespoke porn, and most of it has NOT made it out onto the general internet (unfortunately).

      2. pistoffnick

        That is my “can’t fail” business plan. You come to my establishment to star in your own pornographic movie. We supply the cameras, the set, the lighting, the “boom-chick-wow-wow” sounds, and post production.

        You hire your own co-star from several self-employed actresses.

        You walk out with a smile on your face, a giddy-up in your stride, and your very own movie.

        I’ll make millions!

        1. You know who else thought they had a plan that “can’t fail…”

          1. Don Escaped Texas

            Icarus ?

        2. You’ll want a jurisdiction where both prostitution and porn production are legal, or you’ll be facing a lot of process harassment.

          1. pistoffnick

            But see its not prostitution, because they are actors.

            But, yes, I see a lot of harassment with this business, which is why I haven’t sunk any money into it.

          2. They can get a grand jury to say otherwise. Hense the recommendation for simplicity’s sake.

        3. Sean

          Stock up on empty pizza ? boxes.

    3. as an aside – there is so much porn out there that I’m always amazed when a teacher or the “girl next door” is doxxed or discovered.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Thank god nobody has found mine yet.

        1. We’re thankful too.

          1. Pope Jimbo

            Watching Scruff-pr0n is more embarrassing than making Scruff-pr0n.

      2. Festus

        That just means that you haven’t been practicing enough. Remember Gladwell’s 10,000 hour rule? Get on it, you slug!

      3. straffinrun

        Shouldn’t that mean you aren’t surprised when that happens?

        1. Naw I’m thinking it’s like trying to find a singular fish in an ocean full of ’em.

          I mean what are the chances that I would be surfing around a porn site and see the hottest womanl in the company I work for (provided she had a video out there)?

          1. Look, unless they are professional, full-time porn stars, they have to work somewhere. With the number of them out there, you’re going to get intersections between people who know them and people who’ve seen their work, even by chance.

          2. straffinrun

            6 degrees of makin’ bacon.

          3. straffinrun

            You meant personally? Oh…

          4. blackjack

            That’s just because you don’t live in the San Fernando Valley. I’ve met quite a few. Back in the late eighties, I lived with a porn star for a year.

          5. Rasilio

            Not just that, there are millions of porn videos out there, in order to be identified all of the following has to happen…

            1) the video has to be popular enough to get more than a few views
            2) one of the viewers has to know her in person at least peripherally
            3) he (and it is almost always going to be a he) as to actually spend more than a second or two looking at her face and not other body parts
            4) he has to actually recognize her through all the makeup they put on her which often makes her look like a completely different person
            5) he has to be enough of a shithead to publicly reveal the link to her friends/family/coworkers
            6) she has to be one of the real first timers and someone who will face actual consequences for having it revealed that she did a porn video.

            Now I am not going to say the odds of all 5 of these things happening are so remote that they have never happened, but it would seem to be so remote that it is going to be a REALLY rare thing

    4. straffinrun

      I’m not buying it. The whole thing smacks of a publicity stunt. Even if not, it’s a good idea.

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        I like that take. How many more clicks did they get with that article?

        1. straffinrun

          “Iiiyaaaaada!” as she squeezes hit tits. It’s not like it’s unheard of for porn actresses to play reluctant. This would just be the next step.

    5. Chipwooder

      Pornographers aren’t trustworthy? I’m stunned.

      1. If you can’t trust a pornographer, who can you trust?!

        1. Slammer

          Politicians?

          1. Sean

            That odd looking hooker with an Adam’s apple?

    6. Drake

      I’m sure these dumb girls sign a release granting distribution rights before the cameras start rolling. I wonder if any of them read it?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Words are hard.

        1. “Oh, that’s just something the lawyers say we need in order to sell it at all, even to our private collectors.”

        2. Rasilio

          Apparently it wasn’t just the words that were hard

    7. Gadfly

      … to shoot a video that they allegedly were promised no one back home would ever see.

      Someone should tell these women about this new thing called “the internet”.

  4. Count Potato

    Is SP a judge now?

    1. Festus

      Little Miss Sunshine. Nice work, SP! Old folks can be a trial but you already (ahem) knew that when you climbed into that van.

    2. Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

      1. Festus

        Ten year-old Judge Judy with a sack of rusty tin can lids behind the bench.

  5. The Late P Brooks

    “No one has ever reached out to me about it, nor did I feel like there was any point in trying to sue someone if I stupidly signed a contract that said they could do whatever they want with the video,” she said.

    You’ll never grow up to be a Congresswoman with an attitude like that.

  6. Suthenboy

    “Is there no end of evil in the world?”

    No, there isn’t. Evil doesn’t give birth to itself, like some kind of movie ghost it just moves from one host to another endlessly.

    Dont video sexy time and then complain about other people watching.

    No, they don’t give a shit because it doesn’t mean anything.

    Sacred mountain gives pretense for protection money ex. no. 585,457,392.

    Throw his ass in prison.

    I0b0t, if you are still around: Thank you. I feel bad for the dog too. We named him Charlie Brown because he was brown and had a huge round head. Poor Charlie.
    Fortunately I seem to be healing rapidly with no infection.
    I am glad your kids got to experience that. It is a great learning experience, it’s fun and builds character.

    1. Evil doesn’t give birth to itself, like some kind of movie ghost it just moves from one host to another endlessly.

      Evil is the absence of good. It’s like asking if there is no end of shadows in the world.

      1. Not Adahn

        Yes, in a few billion years.

    2. l0b0t

      Having grown up in an excruciatingly rural environment, I get depressed knowing how many of those experiences my (Brooklyn born) kids are missing. We tend to push natural science type stuff at them whenever the opportunity arises.

    3. OneOut

      Why are old Injuns revered as elders even among whites while old whites are just old and should be shunned ?

      1. Fourscore

        So that’s why no one ever visits me? At least it isn’t that they don’t like for something I’ve done or haven’t done. Like Tony the Tiger says “Its great”

  7. blackjack

    Music ties nicely into the porn, census and the LAPD links, but I’d have went with this.

    1. Rhywun

      Nice!

  8. The Late P Brooks

    Some of the videos posted to Pornhub have been viewed more than 40 million times. The Girls Do Porn channel itself has been live for eight years and garnered more than 677 million views. Its ranking on Pornhub hovers around the 20th most popular channel. This is a massive amount of exposure for people who say they didn’t want to be seen having sex on camera in the first place. And as they take their case to court, Pornhub continues to make money off of them.

    Listen Shirley, I’m not gonna sugarcoat it- you’re you’re doing it wrong.

    1. Festus

      This has become so normalized that I wouldn’t be surprised to see basically “anything” being acceptable in a generation or two. That is unless the pendulum swings back in a big way and I don’t think that’s ever gonna happen.

      1. I don’t know, If you look at the pendulum between perversion and prudery, I don’t think we’ve passed any special threshold where it just breaks and flies off into the void. The cycle does appear to be ~300 years long though.

        1. Not Adahn

          I think the only way you can talk about there being a pendulum in the first place is in the public acknowledgement/acceptance of the activity, rather than the prevalence of the activity. The Victorians indulged a LOT behind the bawdy-house doors. I’ve got a collection of 1930s videos that contains both “harder-core” and “amazingly the same” as modern internet productions. It’s uncanny the way some preferences don’t change, and how fetishistic some people are.

          Grooming habits, otoh change a lot.

          I don’t know if Massachusetts Bay colonists were legitimately more prudish than humanity as a whole or if they were just more effective at destroying the evidence.

          1. There was an area called whore hill (or something like that) during the siege of Boston in the revolutionary War. Granted, a lot of people were disgusted by it, but that’s true today, too.

          2. Festus

            1930s videos… I’d like to subscribe to your newsletter, Good Sir!

          3. Suthenboy

            I cant remember the numbers but I do remember that the majority of children born in early puritan America were born to unmarried what we now consider underage girls. Make of that what you will.

          4. Well, what else was there for them to do?

          5. Sean

            Churn butter.

          6. Not Adahn

            Read the Bible?

          7. Bob Boberson

            “Churn Butter”

            Oh, come now, that’s barely even a euphemism.

          8. Chipwooder

            Just because it involves a stick going into a hole over and over again…..

        2. Festus

          I think it has more to do with the loss of personal contact. People don’t speak to each other anymore, they consume. Driving to work last Sunday I had to stop to let a family cross the street. Everyone of them from Grandma to the youngest tot were engrossed in their screens. This is after they presumably visited the summer festival just a block away. They were strung out like a row of ducks, not talking about what they’d just experienced or how dinner was going to be great. Nope, fucking slaves to the phone.

          1. I’ve never actually seen that, or anything like that.

            Maybe you noticed because it stood out.

          2. Festus

            Sure. Maybe my lying eyes deceived me. Next time I post I’ll be sure to wear my dissembling gloves.

          3. I’m not saying you didn’t see it, I’m wondering if it is actually common, or if the unusual aspect of that family made it stick in your memory.

          4. I see similar types of behavior regularly at restaurants with families and with groups of friends. Heck, it’s a bit of a friction point between my wife and I. She complains about me liking my “internet friends” (glibs) more than her, and I complain about how she can’t seem to peel away from Instagram for 5 minutes.

          5. You purport to live in a city – this you have not seen?

            I can’t even do my commute home without seeing pedestrians and drivers both, eyes locked on the #$%^ing phone.

          6. Not Adahn

            Send her dic pics?

          7. Festus

            Same with me and Wifey and I always counter with her facebook buddies.

          8. A friend of mine drove from Austin to Michigan to see his family. And got home to see his family all sitting around on their devices, not talking to each other. He was a little pissed.

            When I’m hanging out with friends and relatives, the phone goes away unless I’m looking something important up or waiting for a call / text.

          9. You purport to live in a city – this you have not seen?

            I have honestly seen more Amish tourists than phone zombies. And I’ve only seen one family of Amish tourists (so, about ten or so)

          10. Certified Public Asshat

            UCS, you have to be kidding us.

            Even at something like a youth soccer game. The kids might be playing soccer (thinking about their next stretch of screen time) but the parents are not watching, they are all looking at their phones.

          11. I am perfectly serious.

          12. Not Adahn

            When I met UCS, I’m sure there were couples in the diner on their phones, but I also know he didn’t see them because I kept him distracted with my dazzling wit until his corned beef hash arrived to keep him distracted.

          13. commodious spittoon

            In fairness, have you ever watched children’s soccer?

          14. Festus

            That’s fucking adorable! There is one part of my commute that I don’t mind. It’s the combo yoga studio/aerial fitness place that I drive past every night at 8:30 just when the classes get out. Aerial Fitness is pole dancing lessons. It can be milftastic!

          15. Rasilio

            Yup, totally new, absolutely nothing like that ever happened in the history of the world until the cell phone was invented less than 15 years ago…

            https://www.pinterest.com/juanginer/reading-newspapers/

          16. Old Man With Candy

            I got my first hint of this in the early 2000s when the smart phone thing was just barely getting started here (Blackberry was the rage). I was in Milan at a really nice restaurant, and at the next table, the 8 or 9 Italians were all engrossed in texting, barely noticing each other and ditto the superb food. I thought, “Huh, those nutty Italians! Americans wouldn’t do that.”

            Naive me.

        3. The Last American Hero

          Agreed. To paraphrase Adam Corolla, Who would have thought the most popular shows on TV would be updated versions of Star Search and ballroom dancing competitions between D list celebrities?

  9. Drake

    Never give law-enforcement your DNA. Just sayin’.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      So you’re saying I shouldn’t have spanked it into that complaint letter I sent to the FBI?

      1. Festus

        It was the lipstick kiss on the envelope that gave you away.

      2. straffinrun

        ^The Unajizzer

        1. Festus

          +1 crazy beard(s)

    2. Nephilium

      You don’t have to. Family members could have given it to one of the ancestry testing DNA tests, which all cooperate with law enforcement.

    3. blackjack

      Cops have to anyway. They are on scene at the crimes.

  10. I’ve been getting into Gabor Szabo, the Hungarian guitarist.

    His best album – that I’ve heard so far – is Dreams

  11. Sucks about the Kyoani fire. From what I heard, they were actually one of the not so shitty companies in the industry when it came to how they treated their peeps. Hope they recover quickly and rest in peace to the victims, fuggin awful.

    Also, I’m digging the Judge Napolitano-esque links today.

    1. straffinrun

      Arsonists are the fucking worst. Burned to death. Jesus. Child rapists and arsonists really test my opposition to state executions.

      1. Not Adahn

        I guess Kyoani must have been in some kind of older building? Even with an accelerant I don’t see how its possible to start that massive of a fire in an office building with people watching you set it.

        1. According to Google This was their office before the fire.

          1. Not Adahn

            Oh… yeah, that has “firetrap” written all over it.

        2. Sensei

          We will know more when they investigate.

          But if you are hell bent on mischief and worked there you’d know the entrances and exists. So you could chain or disable them before you torched the place.

          Places like this are usually jammed full of stuff too.

    2. Sensei

      Oh no….That’s awful.

      KyoAni is definitely one the studio that gives its talent lots of creative freedom. Still a cut throat business.

  12. OMWC has an in with the president?

    Prosecutions for child sex trafficking plummet under Trump: Maybe it’s a coincidence
    Despite Epstein case, sex-trafficking prosecutions fall by 26% — likely because of focus on border crossing

    Despite the recent arrest of financier Jeffrey Epstein on child sex trafficking charges, federal prosecutions of child sex traffickers have fallen by more than 26 percent under President Trump.

    Federal prosecutors are on pace to file 162 child sex trafficking cases this fiscal year, marking a 26.7 percent drop from last year and a 32.2 percent drop from five years ago, according to a report from Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC).

    “If the present pace of such prosecutions continues, the fiscal 2019 total will be 162, compared to 221 last year,” the report said, adding that 2019 marked the second year that such prosecutions have fallen in a “reversal of the growth trend during the Obama years.”

    Despite the drop since Trump took office, the number of federal child sex trafficking prosecutions is more than 90 percent higher than it was a decade earlier. Such prosecutions increased threefold during Obama’s presidency.

    1. Perhaps Salon could point out some non-prosecuted cases?

    2. Festus

      OFFS, Salon! Really? They used to be an arts and entertainment site that catered to creative people and then 2008 happened. Open Salon circa 2007 was an interesting place, full of lively discussion and cool people. I made (and later lost) some friends there.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I’m sure it’s a coincidence, just like it was a coincidence that ABC is plastering the 27 year old video of Trump at a party with Epstein all over their news programs and not even mentioning a single word about the long-standing relationship Clinton (and many, many NY/DC Democrats) have had with Epstein.

      1. Chipwooder

        I don’t quite get why this is supposed to be a big gotcha. Epstein was socially prominent in Palm Beach for a long time. So is Trump. So are a million other rich and famous people, many if not most of whom are Democrats. They were at the same party – so? Trump’s grinding on adult women in the video, not young girls.

    4. Count Potato

      “Despite the drop since Trump took office, the number of federal child sex trafficking prosecutions is more than 90 percent higher than it was a decade earlier. Such prosecutions increased threefold during Obama’s presidency.”

    5. leon

      You know… I had a co-worker rant to me once about how Trump was going to be caught for this Epstein rape island, which was the real pizzagate. (But pizzagaters were totally crazy). This new evidence makes it clear.

    6. Not Adahn

      Maybe they stopped classifying as many 19 year old prostitutes as child sex trafficking victims?

    7. blackjack

      This shit always pisses me off. Prosecutions depend on crimes being committed. There is no set amount of that. You can’t just throw out a number of how many prosecutions there ought to be. The only stat that makes sense is unsolved crimes. At least then we know (sorta?) That a crime occurred. If half the people choose not to commit the crime, there will be less prosecutions.

  13. Must be a toughie for some folks….Indigenous Peeepulz sacredness vs IFLS!

    Good thing my son is working off info from a scope in AZ.

    1. Festus

      Up here it is so ubiquitous that I just lift my lip at the whole charade. They’re after money, nothing more, nothing less.

      1. OneOut

        Yes. Lefties call old Injuns native elders to be honored but old white people are just old .

  14. Count Potato

    “Jessica Chastain gives leggy display in sparkling striped skirt as she is joined by her It: Chapter 2 costars for New Line Cinema’s 3rd annual ScareDiego at Comic-Con 2019

    ‘I’m very happy to work again in a genre that actually has empowered women. And in that genre, you usually see the person surviving at the end being the lady. “”

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7259723/Jessica-Chastain-Chapter-2-costars-smiles-New-Line-Cinema.html

    1. Festus

      Oaken Wood!

  15. The Late P Brooks

    Libertarians are heartless monsters, ch 6,722

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday blocked an attempt by Democrats to pass an extension of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.

    Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) tried to win the Senate’s consent to approve the House-passed bill, which would reauthorize funding until fiscal 2090. The bill cleared the House in a 402-12 vote last week.

    But Paul objected, pointing to the country’s growing debt and arguing that any new spending should be offset by cuts to other spending.

    “It has long been my feeling that we need to address our massive debt in the country,” he said. “And therefore any new spending … should be offset by cutting spending that’s less valuable. We need to, at the very least, have this debate.”

    He added that if the House bill was brought up for a vote in the Senate he is planning to offer an amendment, “but until then I will object.”

    A spokesperson for Paul later told The Hill that Paul “is not blocking anything,” adding that he is “simply seeking to pay for it.”

    ‘Til 2090? WTF?

    No government handout, once begun, can ever be ended.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Permanent slush fund

    2. Nothing like making your grandkids and their kids pay for shit during your generation.

    3. ChipsnSalsa

      Where’s that “Daniel Boone” speech when we need it?

      1. pistoffnick
        1. pistoffnick

          One of the grizzled stress engineers here at work is named Dave Crocket. I can’t help but to sing the song anytime his name comes up

        2. ChipsnSalsa

          right, I get those to mixed up.

          1. pistoffnick

            I do too.

            Crockett was a very interesting dude.

            He really did not like Andrew Jackson. And vice-versa. Jackson really screw Crockett over

          2. Brett L

            “You may all go to Hell, and I shall go to Texas” is a great mic drop line.

    4. Chipwooder

      Seeking to pay for it? What kind of reckless nonsense is that???

    5. Slammer

      If people feel a moral imperative to help families of 9/11 victims for generations, then why not a charitable foundation, or a GoFund Me? Nothing is stopping anyone who wants to help these people from doing so.

      1. straffinrun

        Because violent appropriation of funds is the only way to support victims of violence.

        1. Because violent appropriation of funds from innocent third parties is the only way to support victims of violence.

          FIFY

          1. straffinrun

            Damn Lawyers. You gonna bill me for that?

          2. At a Minimum of one hour per consultation.

          3. Nah, I just pulled it out of your retainer. By the way, your retainer is depleted and needs refilled.

      2. Rebel Scum

        Why do the families deserve taxpayer funds anyway?

      3. The Last American Hero

        Well, to be fair, the Fedgov failed to prevent the attacks after pissing away trillions on intelligence agencies and national defense, then gave medals of Freedom to the fuckups.

    6. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Why do you want to deprive those 125 year old first responders of their health care?

      1. If they make it to 125, I don’t think responding to 9/11 hurt them any.

    7. Rhywun

      No worries. Next week they’ll be back on the “muh debt” train because Trump’s tax cuts.

  16. Rebel Scum

    House Democrats had demanded information about why the administration sought to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census and were not satisfied with the response, saying that neither Barr nor Ross responded to a legitimate congressional subpoena.

    Isn’t it a moot point anyway considering the court ruling on the matter?

    1. Nope.

      It’s a stage to grandstand on.

      That’s all that matters.

  17. The Late P Brooks

    I’m sure these dumb girls sign a release granting distribution rights before the cameras start rolling. I wonder if any of them read it?

    They plied them with cake. Not fair.

  18. ChipsnSalsa

    To which state did OMWC’s Mom travel, escorted by his sister?

    Arizona

    Does Mom have any idea whose home she is visiting?

    None, what-so-ever

    Is my name “Honey?”

    Your name is Poppy

    Am I an exceedingly patient person?

    Yes, but when snapped. Thermonuclear.

    Will I be consuming many gallons of cocktails in the coming weeks?

    no, “many” is the wrong generalization of quantity. boatloads is probably better.

  19. Scruffy Nerfherder
    1. Count Potato

      LOL

    2. ChipsnSalsa

      that’s funny

    3. Website blocked.

      “Online Storage and Backup”? Seriously, that’s the category it’s in?

    4. That’s a great shirt, I laughed hard.

  20. Rebel Scum

    Figurative conviction

    ep. Al Green (D-Texas) said the House of Representatives “convicted” President Donald Trump by voting to pass a resolution to “condemn” his attacks on freshman House Democrats…
    The final vote on Tuesday evening was 240-187 with four Republicans joining the Democrats in voting yes.

    Green saw the passage of the resolution as a “conviction” that could lead to impeachment. Green was pushing for an up-or-down vote on articles of impeachment Wednesday evening but the effort failed.

    “He was convicted. I see this as a bifurcated process. Yesterday was his trial. He was convicted. Today is his punishment and I’m pushing for impeachment because yesterday we imposed no sanctions. There’s no fine and he’s not going to leave office,” Green said. “The president ought to be sanctioned so as to impose proper sanctions we then have to move to today. It’s a bifurcated process.”

    Idk about this term. But I suppose he is referring to the multi-pronged attacks that are an effort to remove Trump by any means necessary.

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      I’m just going to assume the honorable Rep Green doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.

    2. straffinrun

      He forgot “show” before “trial”.

    3. leon

      I don’t often fear retards, but when I do it’s because they are congressman.

      1. Remember, they might not have apelike strength…but don’t lock eyes with ’em. Might set ’em off. Next thing you know they are like a whirling Dervish, all elbows and fists…

        1. leon

          Rep Green: did someone say something about cake?

  21. Trump thanks ‘vicious young Socialist Congresswomen’ for his poll numbers

    New Poll: The Rasmussen Poll, one of the most accurate in predicting the 2016 Election, has just announced that “Trump” numbers have recently gone up by four points, to 50%. Thank you to the vicious young Socialist Congresswomen. America will never buy your act! #MAGA2020

    1. straffinrun

      Maybe they were good in 2016, but didn’t Rasmussen flub the midterms?

    1. Chipwooder

      Where’s my fainting couch?

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      Nothing will happen.

      Look. The DNC is accepting of illegal immigrants, free care for those illegals, infanticide, Obama spying and secret kill lists, and MS-13. You think a little in-breeding marriage is gonna sway them now?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Hell, it took five people with credible accounts of pedophilic abuse to come forward on Ed Murray to get them to abandon him, and he was just a mayor.

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          Oh, they also want to normalize pedophilia.

          The Democrats (and Liberals here) are illiberal psychopaths.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        I don’t quite understand what she got by marrying her brother, but I don’t think it was for sexy times. Shit she kept living with her first husband the whole time, so I think there must have been some financial angle to the whole thing.

        When they were at NDSU, all three of them shared the same address.

        She might be a lot of things, but I sincerely doubt she’s a brother fucker.

        1. Immigration Fraud.

        2. -1 Shelbyville

        3. leon

          The implication I’ve heard was immigration fraud.

        4. Rufus the Monocled

          “When they were at NDSU, all three of them shared the same address.”

          And bed.

          Right?

          C’man!

        5. Rasilio

          It was a green card marriage, nothing more.

          So she isn’t really guilty of incest and only technically guilty of bigamy but she is absolutely guilty of immigration fraud and likely at least a few other crimes that tend to be related

      3. Urthona

        Not inbreeding really. She was just scamming the system to get a relative in the country.

  22. The Late P Brooks

    Gillibrand, after Paul objected, said she was “deeply disappointed” in his decision, adding, “Enough of the political games.”

    “I am deeply disappointed that my colleague has just objected to the desperately needed and urgent bill for our 9/11 first responders,” she added

    Of course you are, Senator Sorority Girl.

    1. Rhywun

      “Enough of the political games.”

      Saw her little speech by accident on the teevee. It was as nauseating as you would expect. When that line came out of her mouth I almost spit beverage.

  23. Nephilium

    In today’s everything is terrible, and always has been:

    Reminder For ‘Stranger Things’ Fans: The Eighties Sucked

    T/W: Cracked

    1. Chipwooder

      It’s hard to remember now, but Cracked was a really funny site once upon a time.

    2. Did the author even live through the decade?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Apparently, he did and he’s always been an asshole:

        This isn’t a contest. I’m not saying your fears about the future aren’t valid. (The last time we saw suicide rates this high was, yep, 1986.) I’m saying that the only reason today seems worse is that you have knowledge that eighties America didn’t have: You know how things turned out for us.

        In 1984, it was actually seen as almost certain that if humanity survived to see the 21st century at all, we’d be competing with rats for food. We waited for the nukes to come, waited for the Soviets to take over the Earth, for the Japanese to collapse our economy, for the cities to descend into crime and chaos. I swear that every movie, show, or song was either worshiping the cocaine-and-Jacuzzi lifestyle or warning about the end times, like we were all having one final party until the real world looked like Escape From New York, The Day After, or the Mad Max movies.

        And it wasn’t like we had any healthy coping mechanisms. This was square in the dark ages of mental healthcare, when people made jokes about those weirdos in Hollywood needing “therapists.” There was no social media through which we could connect to each other, no easy way to debunk propaganda, no way to reach out across physical and cultural boundaries, no one to let you know that you weren’t alone.

        He’s right about one thing. He could use a good therapist.

        1. He doesn’t seem to be willing to grasp what escapism is either.

        2. Chipwooder

          There was no social media through which we could connect to each other, no easy way to debunk propaganda, no way to reach out across physical and cultural boundaries, no one to let you know that you weren’t alone.

          Fuck, no social media! We actually had to spend time in each other’s presence and talk face to face. The horror! The horror!

          Good to know there’s no propaganda these days! That’s particularly rich coming from a website that started pumping out pro-tranny articles on a weekly basis several years back.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That guy has issues. He’s a miserable life-hating SOB. It’s no wonder Cracked sucks with him as executive editor.

      1. Chipwooder

        Yes, the decline of Cracked was a direct result of the elevation of David “I’m actually a white guy named Jesse” Wong, SJW nonpareil.

    4. The 80s were a mixed bag for sure but among the cultural garbage there was some great things. I had a very free roaming childhood with a small group of friends. Dungeons and Dragons, early computers, beat up muscle cars, some great punk music, blah blah blah.

      1. Chipwooder

        We ALL had free roaming childhoods, which is largely why we weren’t all massive pussies like anyone who has grown up since the late ’90s. I can remember the day we moved to Richmond from Long Island in 1983. I was seven years old, the movers were carrying boxes into the house, and my dad said “Go find some kids to play with”. So I got on my bike, rode down the street, and did exactly that. My parents had no idea where I was. Half of my friends in elementary school were latchkey kids who were home alone for hours before their mom or dad came home.

        You came up with things to do. We made dirt tracks in the woods to race our bikes on. Dug out a baseball field in a vacant lot. Caught frogs, crawfish, and occasionally even snakes in the creek. Scavenged scrap wood and nails from construction sites to build tree forts. But yeah, it totally sucked because we didn’t have XBox and Netflix and artisinal mayonnaise.

        1. pistoffnick

          ” …it totally sucked because we didn’t have… artisinal mayonnaise.”

          I did (whenever Grandma came to visit)

        2. You came up with things to do. We made dirt tracks in the woods to race our bikes on.

          HOA frowned upon such “petty vandalism”

          Dug out a baseball field in a vacant lot.

          Vacant lot? That’s a finin’

          Caught frogs, crawfish, and occasionally even snakes in the creek.

          “Dear neighborhood parents, we are concerned about the youth activity near the retention pond. There have been sightings of potentially dangerous wildlife in the area around the pond and the pond itself is an unsafe play environment.

          Smooches
          HOA”

          Scavenged scrap wood and nails from construction sites to build tree forts.

          I actually got an angry HOA letter because of this one. Most of the others were just disapproving conversations with random neighbors.

          I had a split childhood. The first half (early 90s) was semi-rural and nearly feral. Lots of troublemaking and lots of good old fashion fun. The second half (late 90s) was in a typical suburban cookie cutter neighborhood where people “frowned on” things and “property value” is king.

          1. Chipwooder

            Our neighborhood was an aborted subdivision. They made one street and then the money ran out, thus no HOA.

          2. Good, HOAs are abominable.

          3. Chipwooder

            As someone who had the misfortune to live in a neighborhood with one for a few years, I agree. Very glad there isn’t one where we live now.

          4. robc

            They are a mixed bag. I have lived with and without them. My current one is entirely nonexistent other than collecting a small check every year.

            I generally prefer without, but they arent all horrible.

            Also, I generally oppose the concept of deed restrictions. I have an article idea brewing on that. But it is about 257th on my list.

          5. An idea that came to me that hasn’t been fully fleshed out is the ability to pay out of deed restrictions. Maybe cap the entirety of pay outs at a percentage of purchase price, and the payouts go to the beneficiaries of the restrictions (your neighbors).

            Idk, I’ll think about the implications more.

          6. robc

            My idea (which apparently FL actually had as law at one time, until developers got it changed) was to time limit deed restrictions. I would put a 25 year limit (the FL one was either 20 or 30).

            That is basically a generation. You want to control the character of a neighborhood? You can do it for 25 years, then it gets to evolve naturally.

            There would need to be two aspects:

            1. The time limit on deed restrictions
            2. Elimination of (most) zoning. The parenthetical would be only for heavy industrial.

            So you can create an HOA with a restriction to single family homes, but a generation from now it might start changing.

          7. My neighborhood had an association – in 1960 – but over the years it just kind of fell apart. Is this common or is the HOA a more modern thing?

          8. Rasilio

            Not sure but modern HOA’s often can’t legally fall apart.

            It is a nice little scam that cities and towns pull with developers.

            See the city/town/county whoever is in charge of approving the development will only agree to allow the developer to move forward with the project IF each deed comes with restrictions requiring the community to have an HOA and requiring all owners to always vote to have the HOA “professionally” managed, and they are barred from ever voting to disband the HOA,

            Also in the agreement, the HOA agrees to be responsible for some portion of services which would normally be paid for by the government. It could be street maintenance, it could be trash removal, snow removal, or any of a dozen other such services.

            Now the city/town/county has 400 new houses that they will collect property taxes on at the same rate as the rest of the homes under their jurisdiction however they are not required to cover all the same services for those homes.

        3. Hammercorps

          That stuff still exists in (extremely rural) parts of the country today. I grew up in the late 00’s/early 10’s and did a bunch of that type of stuff. Riding bikes on mountains trails, go with friends to climb the cemetery hill by the river so we could slide back down, built tree forts, etc.

          It also helped that I grew up in a town of 2000 people and lived on a ranch for half my childhood though. Different family values.

          1. Desk Jockey

            It’s all about the family values. I graduated high school in 2012 in a semi-rural area. All we did as kids was screw around in the woods and get into trouble. Credit to my folks being big believers in always doing something outdoors. Other than that, they just let me and my brother run wild.

        4. Don Escaped Texas

          Contriving ad hoc rules to make baseball workable for the place and persons available is the most American thing of all time.

          When a squad of boys thus “raised” parachutes into the wrong place, they just figure out what to do and get on with it.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        The dude even dissed on “cruising”. The fun we had driving up and down the beach when we were kids was awesome. My kids would never think of doing something like that. Since they can contact all their buddies online, they don’t need to drive around just to see what is happening.

      3. Spartacus

        I spent most of the 80s in college, so naturally I don’t remember much of it.

    5. ChipsnSalsa

      This statement is made in a negative connotation

      When actual home-cooked meals were made, it was endless casseroles…

      He’s a moron and can safely be dismissed.

      1. Casseroles have endless variations.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        If his momma loved him she would have made hotdish.

    6. Stinky Wizzleteats

      *sigh*
      I miss John Cheese, the drunken version. Cracked just sucks now.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        I remember when Sean Baby was writing there I liked him. He deserves a statue somewhere just for Fat Chicks in Party Hats

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          I remember him and he was good. I just did a quick search for John Cheese and found a post on Medium where he’s apologizing for sexually harassing women on the interweb. Oh well, his old articles are still funny.

          1. Chipwooder

            Even Cheese went woke? That’s sad. He was very funny.

          2. Stinky Wizzleteats

            It was in vein too, the ladies don’t accept his apology.

            https://medium.com/@johncheese_62352/i-owe-a-huge-apology-d7bde07b8042

          3. Pope Jimbo

            in vein too

            Damn, that is cold. The chicks didn’t even accept his main lined apology?

          4. Stinky Wizzleteats

            I’m going to blame that on autocorrect. Yeah, that’s the ticket.

    7. gbob

      Very different experience than I had. Of course, many of the things the author complains about (bullies, Reagan, “nothing to do”) seem like features rather than bugs.

      1. Nephilium

        Same here. The cold war was a thing, but I wasn’t always terrified that the bombs were going to start dropping. Having no idea where he lived, in my area there were several movie theaters (close by ones were mostly second run theaters), as well as arcades. I didn’t know anyone who didn’t have a phone line in their house. And I was in the east side suburbs of Cleveland, not exactly a boomtown in the 80’s.

        1. I was too young to understand nuclear annihilation. The Soviets were just ‘the bad guys’ and I was surprised to learn Reagan wouldn’t always be president.

          1. robc

            The first election I remember was Ford/Carter.

            I had a Ford/Dole bumper sticker on my bedroom door.

        2. Heck I had my own private phone line. And a 300 (and then a 1200) baud modem for dialing into local BBS boards. Met some people through those early computer connections, playing War in the Streets.

        3. Chipwooder

          I actually can remember being frightened of nuclear war. We watched The Day After in school once, Red Dawn was VERY popular with my peer group, and WarGames seemed very real to young me.

          But it was really background noise more than anything. Kids are kids, they find ways to amuse themselves despite whatever’s going on in the world.

          1. blackjack

            I have a story about cold war paranoia, but it’s too long for here.

        4. Pope Jimbo

          My shitty hometown had a movie theater. Sure it ran second run movies, but it was still something to do. If we wanted first run movies we had to drive to Moorhead 45 miles away. But you know what, we’d load up a car and joke around all the way there and back.

    8. robc

      #12 is just false, I havent even got to the first 11.

      Yes, that stuff existed. No, not everyone was eating it.

      1. robc

        The TV had three channels, and VCRs and premium cable were both still too expensive for most families

        Ummm…what? He just described the 70s, not the 80s, but we had 6 channels even then. ABC, CBS, NBC, local indy (FOX in the 80s), KET and PBS.

        The last 2 were often showing the same things at the same time, but not always.

        And by ’81 we had cable.

        I will street view the house I grew up in and no one would put us in the top 25% of households. It was a “nice”* working class/lower middle class neighborhood.

        *You know, if you ignore the break ins every few years in the late 70s and early 80s.

        1. We only got broadcast TV, but we had five channels – ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, and Fox.

        2. Nephilium

          I’m not going to argue the food, my parents were terrible cooks. There’s a reason both me and my sister learned how to cook when we moved out.

          We had 3, 5, 8, 19 (FOX when they started, wasn’t on the air before that), 25, 43, and 61 off the top of my head. We didn’t get cable until the mid/late 80’s, but had friends who did. My parents still live in the house I grew up in.

          1. robc

            My parents still live in the house I grew up in.

            As do mine, they need to move, but won’t because of my Dad. Whenever he passes, we are getting my Mom to sell (and the house next door, which they own and rent) and move, probably in with my sister.

            The neighbor was moderate to crappy back then and is worse now.

          2. robc

            neighborhood, most of the neighbors are fine.

          3. Thankfully we all got out of the house I grew up in. That house, and the neighborhood, was a shithole, that’s only gotten worse since. Looking at google maps or zillow over the old neighborhood, and I see a lot of empty lots where houses used to be and get ‘Detroit’ vibes.

        3. robc

          I read the rest of the article and we lived in entirely different decades.

        4. Rasilio

          lets see, so far as I know my entire life the big city of Lowell Ma we had the following channels …

          VHF Channel 2 PBS
          VHF Channel 4 NBC
          VHF Channel 5 ABC
          VHF Channel 7 CBS
          VHF Channel 11 ABC (I think it was ABC but it was based out of Manchester so it had slightly different local programming and the same network shows)
          UHF Channel 25 (poor reception as it was a NH station)
          UHF Channel 38
          UHF Channel 56

          And I don’t remember which channel it was on but there was a NH version of PBS somewhere on the UHF dial but it mostly showed the same programming as Channel 2

          So that is 9 channels and we got HBO right around 81 an that gave us another 15 or so.

          There were a minimum of 4 movie theaters with an average of like 9 screens each within a 15 minute drive one of which was within biking distance and located about 300 yds outside the city limit.

          There were 3 malls within a 15 minute drive, 2 amusement parks within a 30 minute drive, and 3 drive in movies within a 20 minute drive, and in town we had 2 roller rinks, a skating rink, a Bowling Alley, and 4 public pools.

          Note: This was in a city where well over half the residents were on welfare of some sort.

          Yeah this guy isn’t complaining about the 80’s. He’s complaining about growing up in a poor backwater town, someone should tell him those places still exist.

    9. Sean

      Yeah, the 80s sucked. /eye roll

      Me and my friend next door could walk in our backyard hollow and plink away a brick of .22 with no hassle. In NJ.

    10. Rhywun

      I’m surprised Reagan only made it to #2 on the list of horribles.

      What a sad, sad person.

  24. Count Potato

    “AOC says calling people ‘communist’ has a ‘rich history’ in ‘white supremacy’

    “It was one of the preferred smears against integrating schools, & one of the main attacks segregationists used against [Martin Luther King Jr],” she said, referring to the civil rights hero.

    Ocasio-Cortez linked to a tweet calling out a conservative publication for allegedly justifying racist attacks directed toward a socialist.

    “Credit where credit is due: the argument that it’s okay to be racist against a socialist who is critical of America was pioneered in the 1960s by National Review in their many attacks on Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Jeet Heer, a correspondent for the left-leaning magazine The Nation, tweeted.”

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-says-calling-people-communist-has-a-rich-history-in-white-supremacy

    1. Count Potato

      “AOC says calling people ‘communist’ has a ‘rich history’ in ‘white supremacy’ AOC responds to every criticism by claiming she is the victim of one of the following: -Racism -Sexism -Classism The only card she can ever play is that she is a victim”

      https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1151675630322212864

      1. Rebel Scum

        Ad-homs are the retort of people who can’t defend their positions.

    2. Rebel Scum

      “AOC says calling people ‘communist’ has a ‘rich history’ in ‘white supremacy’

      In the form of white-supremacist Russians?

      1. pan fried wylie

        White-supremacist Russian:

        1pt cocoa butter
        1pt heavy cream
        3pt neutral spirit

        garnish with dollop of artisanal mayonnaise

    3. Holy shit, what a moronic douchenozzle, albeit we all already know how intellectually deficient she is.

    4. Chipwooder

      Boy, that’s going to give the NeverTrump NRO crowd a serious case of the sadz. “But…but….we’re on the same side here!”

    5. She’s right – the KKK used to ride through the night, handing out anti-communist pamphlets to the little chillins.

    6. leon

      So what about the self proclaimed communists.

    7. B.P.

      She needs to get with the program. MLK Jr. was under-bussed during the metoo purges.

    8. Gadfly

      Credit where credit is due: the argument that it’s okay to be racist against a socialist who is critical of America was pioneered in the 1960s by National Review in their many attacks on Martin Luther King, Jr.

      Unless evidence is provided that such attacks were race-based, I’m going to assume this is a slander, as MLK did hold many views that deserved to be attacked. He’s a hero for his contribution to civil rights, but his ideas on economic policy were way off base. I’m thinking NR probably attacked the latter.

  25. Why voting our conscience is bad in the US

    Most of these Democrats were just mad because they thought Bernie Sanders had been eliminated in the primaries via an unethical manipulation of the debates by the party chair, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. By interpreting their vote as a matter of conscience, they ignored the fact that anger can’t solve a single problem, let alone the complex set of problems haunting the US government. Sensible voting has solved many.

    In this country we have a partial democracy in presidential races. We have interference by the electoral college and only two viable parties, Democrat and Republican. The Green and Libertarian parties are no more viable at the presidential level than the Communist and Socialist parties were up until the 1970s.

    Politics is the art of compromise, that means progress comes gradually. No political change can come about all at once. We can’t expect perfect justice from either of the political parties immediately. We must be patient and create justice step by step, issue by issue.

    I can see working conscientiously, playing conscientiously and, in general, behaving conscientiously, once in political office particularly. But we should never vote conscientiously; we should vote intelligently. We only have two choices in the US, better or worse. If we don’t vote for one of these choices, we help the other.

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Keep voting for those corrupt and self interested pigs who have made such a mess of things, it’s the only reasonable thing to do.

    2. leon

      The third parties don’t have a chance because no one votes for them. Therefore voting for them is wrong because they don’t have a chance.

      Also note that by their definition, voting third party lets you help boh candidates simultaneously.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      We only have two choices in the US, shitty or shittier.

      FIFY

    4. Rebel Scum

      We have interference by the electoral college

      ‘Interference’?

      If we don’t vote for one of these choices, we help the other.

      And if I simply choose not to vote at all? Failed logic is failed.

      1. leon

        Not just that but if you don’t vote for A you help B necessarily means not voting for A or B helps both. The fallacy is assuming A owns the votes and withholding it is taking it away

      2. leon

        “We have interference by the electoral college”

        I missed that. This person seems to think this was some arcane thing no one had heard of till Trump got elected.

  26. Count Potato

    “I’m on Anderson Cooper in about half an hour…”

    https://twitter.com/marwilliamson/status/1151703791009329152

    I don’t think you’re his type.

  27. Letter: The Republican disinformation team

    The disinformation team, including Forum columnist Rob Port, lumps socialism, communism, fascism, Soviet Union, China, Cuba, North Korea and every evil dictator in history together as one big socialist tragedy. A recent Forum editorial cartoon depicts refugee families fleeing “socialist countries.” A letter to the editor by Jim Ebsen repeats this false equivalence, claiming socialism resulted in hundreds of millions of deaths.

    For those who fell asleep in high school history class: capitalism, socialism, communism and fascism are each a different economic system. Furthermore, the evil of dictators like Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler was their tyrannical rule, not socialism. Anyway, Stalin was a communist. Hitler was a fascist.

    Socialism is an economic system defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “collective or government ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.” It is possible for a country to be both socialist and a democracy. However, the fact is none of the Democrats running for president are supporting such an economic system. Rather, they promote “social democracy” which means a private sector economy with a strong social safety net. A strong safety net makes it easier for individuals to take the risks of entrepreneurship.

    If Port, Ebsen, and others are concerned about authoritarian leaders and danger to our democracy, they need to confront President Donald Trump who has warmed up to and praised every dictator he meets. If they wish to voice opposition to nonexistent socialism threats, that is their right. But first, they should learn what socialism really is so they can make rational arguments.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      He stayed awake in public school history class.

    2. leon

      “For those who fell asleep in high school history class: capitalism, socialism, communism and fascism are each a different economic system”

      For those of you who were brainwashed on high school only one of those things is different from the others.


      Socialism is an economic system defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “collective or government ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.””

      Except when it’s convenient to call Denmark socialist.

      “However, the fact is none of the Democrats running for president are supporting such an economic system.”

      Your right, they just call themselves socialists. Get it. Democrats are now having a marketing problem because a bunch of geniuses thought calling themselves socialists would play well.

      ” A strong safety net makes it easier for individuals to take the risks of entrepreneurship”

      But why bother when you have dolts advocating for cradle to grave care for those unwilling to work, and a 90% tax rate for the “rich”.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        That trope about you need safety nets to take risks needs a serious citation.

        The expansion in entrepreneurship prior to the 20th century didn’t have such perks.

        1. Tundra

          I think that is exactly backwards. A safety net destroys entrepreneurial drive.

          1. pan fried wylie

            reduced risk results in retarded rewards.

      2. Gadfly

        For those of you who were brainwashed on high school only one of those things is different from the others.

        In fairness, there are more differences than that. Classical capitalism is private ownership and private control over capital, classical fascism is private ownership and public control over capital, while classic socialism is public ownership and public control over capital. And classical communism is the fantasy that capital can be abolished.

    3. Suthenboy

      Another ‘That wasn’t real socialism!’ apologist?

      *grasps forehead, falls onto fainting couch*

    4. Rebel Scum

      lumps socialism, communism, fascism, Soviet Union, China, Cuba, North Korea and every evil dictator in history together as one big socialist tragedy.

      That’s because they are. Socialism and Communism need a total state in order to be attempted to function. Fascism is merely socialism with some sort of national&racial superiority complex.

    5. Pope Jimbo

      What are you nosing around the Fargo Foolum for? That should be Mike’S job. And I look at it too because I have a kid going to NDSU and spend time in NoDak every year.

      1. I didn’t find it, it found me.

  28. Scruffy Nerfherder

    capitalism, socialism, communism and fascism are each a different economic system

    One of these things is not like the others.

    1. Drake

      “capitalism” is the derogatory term for economic freedom.

    2. Rebel Scum

      The economic aspect of fascism is socialism.

  29. Stinky Wizzleteats

    If socialism isn’t present in the form of a voluntary commune then it ultimately requires totalitarianism and oppression. I don’t think the author has thought his viewpoint through.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      They trip over themselves on ‘technicalities’ of definitions.

    2. Rebel Scum

      They will never be voluntary because they fly in the face of human nature. ///newsovietman

  30. The Late P Brooks

    Berkley being Berkley

    Berkeley, California, a city with a long history of progressivism, is moving forward with a plan to remove all gendered language from its city code as part of an effort to recognize its nonbinary residents.

    Soon, in the Bay Area city just east of San Francisco, all instances of “he” and “she” in the city code will replaced by the gender-neutral “they.”

    The City Council on Tuesday adopted the first reading of the new ordinance eliminating “gender preference language” in its municipal code.

    With the change, “manholes” will be called “maintenance holes,” “firemen” will become “firefighters,” “manmade” will be “artificial” and all instances of “men and women” will be replaced by “people.”

    The effort was spearheaded by City Council member Rigel Robinson.

    “It is Berkeley being Berkeley, and what that means is it’s Berkeley being inclusive,” Robinson told NBC Bay Area. “A male-centric municipal code doesn’t reflect the reality of the city of Berkeley.”

    Robinson said the change to the city code, which will cost $600, is important because “language has power.”

    It’s good to have priorities. Why worry about hobo jungles and cholera epidemics when your building code is hurtful to the gender-confused 1% fringe of society?

    1. leon

      I’m excited to see the court ruling that says everything is legal as long as you don’t do it in a group. (I know it doesn’t work that way)

    2. Certified Public Asshat

      With the change, “manholes” will be called “maintenance holes,”

      Not human holes?

      1. Not Adahn

        STEVE SMITH LIKE HUMAN HOLES!

      2. Suthenboy

        It is getting to the point where language will just be a jumble of random letters.

        1. leon

          Technically….

      3. Rebel Scum

        And here I was thinking that “manhole” is the term because it is an access point that is the size of a human. IOW it is already gender sex-neutral.

        1. Gadfly

          Here you thought correctly. I was just going to respond that “maintenance hole” is a degradation of the language, since that broadens the meaning of something that is supposed to be more specific. The two common sizes of maintenance holes are manholes (large enough to fit a person) and handholes (smaller and shallower, not intended for a person to get inside of although a small person could technically squeeze into a larger handhole if they were determined).

      4. Gustave Lytton

        It’s so that can keep the MH abbreviation on maps.

        Been there, done that 30+ years ago. Went back to manholes 20+ years ago officially, and unofficially they never changed.

    3. straffinrun

      Changing “manmade” to “artificial”? Those aren’t really synonyms.

    4. leon

      ““men and women” will be replaced by “people.””

      Not all men or women identify as people.

    5. Pope Jimbo

      What about manslaughter charges? Will those be changed too?

      1. Brett L

        Womanslaughter will carry the same penalty as first degree murder.

    6. Rebel Scum

      to remove all gendered language from its city code

      And what of the Spanish translation?

      1. Gadfly

        The Spanish language will have to be rewritten to be more inclusive.

    7. Nephilium

      In other Berkley news, let’s ban an efficient (and clean) heating and cooking fuel source:

      Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        Berkeley city council gets a stiffy over this innovative cooking technique

    8. Rebel Scum

      “he” and “she” in the city code will replaced by the gender-neutral linguistically incorrect “they.”

    9. R C Dean

      “the change to the city code, which will cost $600”

      I think xe is missing a few zeros. That would be 40 hours at minimum wage. Rewriting the entire code is going to take higher priced people a lot longer than one week.

      1. $600 is the cost of the gas needed to burn all the papers. The labor costs nothing, there will be plenty of volunteers.

      2. Juvenile Bluster

        They’re going to have an intern do a find and replace in a Word version of the code, which is going to produce hilarious results.

  31. The Late P Brooks

    Has-been “comedian” haz outrage

    Comedian Jon Stewart, an outspoken advocate for 9/11 first responders, blasted Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., for his objection Wednesday to a bipartisan bill to ensure a compensation fund for victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks never runs out of money.

    Speaking to Fox News host Bret Baier Wednesday, Stewart called Paul’s objection to the bill, which the libertarian-aligned senator said should be offset by spending cuts, was “outrageous” and “an abomination.”

    “Pardon me if I’m not impressed in any way by Rand Paul’s fiscal responsibility virtue signaling,” Stewart said, noting that Paul supported President Donald Trump’s tax cut that “added hundreds of billions of dollars to our deficit.” He accused Paul of trying to “balance the budget on the backs of the 9/11 first responder community.””

    I, for one, am feeling quite remorseful after this biting chastisement.

    1. Chipwooder

      The clown nose is off for now, I see.

      1. Chipwooder

        Also, did I miss something here? Why exactly am I supposed to give a shit about Jon Stewart’s opinion on this issue?

        1. Rebel Scum

          Because he CARES.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          Because this is his pet issue that he is NOT joking around about!

    2. B.P.

      “…noting that Paul supported President Donald Trump’s tax cut that “added hundreds of billions of dollars to our deficit.””

      Broken record in Glibland, but…. Letting people keep their own money is government spending.

  32. This Twitter Alternative Was Supposed To Be Nicer, But Bigots Love It Already

    Shalom goys! Remember to accept more illegal immigrants into the USA! Remember diversity is your strength goy! What’s that? Why doesn’t Israel accept rapefugees? Uh… because… OY VEY LOOK AT THE TIME! Have to go!”

    These words, which are accompanied by a caricature of a large-nosed, yarmulke-wearing Jew, read like the kind of white supremacist screed you’d find in one of the corners of the internet known for hatred and bigotry. They’re not on Gab or 4chan, though — they’re on a new, growing platform called Parler News.

    John Matze, the self-described libertarian engineer behind Parler, says his goal is to provide an alternative to Twitter by fostering political discourse more like what you get in real life, when face-to-face conversations mitigate much of the anger. He hasn’t succeeded as yet, however. Parler is full of fury, fear and conspiracy theories. What’s more, the platform doesn’t have the technology or resources necessary to contain the Jew-hatred and Islamophobia so easily found there.

    “I don’t think you can have it both ways,” said Alison Dagnes, a professor of political science at Shippensburg University. “I don’t think it works that you say, ‘We’re going to have a safe space for people who have been kicked off of other platforms because their speech is hateful and we promise that this safe space is going to be really civilized.’ How does that work? There is no such thing as civilized hate speech.”

    Free speech, how does it work?

    1. leon

      “What’s more, the platform doesn’t have the technology or resources necessary to contain the Jew-hatred and Islamophobia so easily found there.”

      Not even Twitter itself can contain all the anti-white sentiment.

    2. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Let me guess, Alison’s side gets to decide what hate speech is, right?

    3. Rebel Scum

      Hate is subjective and offense is taken, not given. Toughen up buttercup. ///LearnToCode

    4. B.P.

      You could, I dunno, ignore the stupid shit that fringe assholes type on the Internet. I do love this formula though:

      1. Find something stupid on a social media platform authored by a nobody
      2. Call professor who will be preloaded with bias-confirming quote
      3. Scramble together in obtuse article
      4. Press “Publish” on “trend” article

    5. Gadfly

      I’ve thought that a competitor should attempt to set up a site where anything (legal) goes but everything has tags (like the articles here) and everyone can filter by tag what they want to see or not see. Getting the tags right would be the hard part, but I think if you allowed it to be crowdsourced with some responsible moderation on top that could be appealed to in order to prevent false-flagging you might get it to work. Easier said than done, but seems like the best way to have your cake and eat it to (free speech + safe space).

  33. The Late P Brooks

    “This is unacceptable,” Gillibrand tweeted. “9/11 first responders are suffering and dying for their heroism, and my Republican colleagues can’t get it together to help them. I ask you: What are you even doing here?”

    Sick burn.

    1. leon

      What are you here for if you aren’t going to give money away for 90 years.

    2. robc

      Mr. Speaker–I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. — Davy Crockett

      I don’t think the bolded part is true anymore.

      1. robc

        This was the part I tried to bold:

        Every member upon this floor knows it.

        Why can’t wordpress use standard tags?

        1. Technically, they do.

          Blame the standard for being terrible.

          1. robc

            b is still part of the standard, even if it is practically deprecated.

          2. *tries to get ‘blink’ tags to work again*

      2. Don Escaped Texas

        I love telling Texans that my Congressman died in the Alamo: top that

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Was Ted Kennedy renting from Hertz when he drowned Mary Jo? That would be close.

          1. ChipsnSalsa

            unfortunately, he persisted.

          2. Juvenile Bluster

            That was actually 50 years ago today.

          3. Rhywun

            I’m sure it’s all over MSM.

          4. Old Man With Candy

            I kept the newspaper from the moon landing, and there on the bottom corner of the front page is the Kennedy story. Weird coincidence, and Teddy can bless the astronauts for drawing all the attention.

          5. Gustave Lytton

            He didn’t try very hard.

        2. robc

          He represented eastern TN, right? I thought you were in western part of state?

          I could be wrong on 1 or both of those statements.

          1. Don Escaped Texas

            You are correct that Crockett was born in the Franklin Movement area of North Carolina that many other Huguenot settled in; there weren’t any other real options further west ten years before partition.

            Tennessee and Kentucky are really odd in America in that they are wide states. Explored from east to west, the US is usually punctuated with packets of space that are actually packets of time; most states (MS, AL, the colonies, IL, IN) are just a few miles and a decade of settling or so wide; even the place-names (eg: Van Buren) line up on meridians to mark our evolution and expansion. To live in the west end of a wide state is to have your history begin 400 miles away while your own neighborhood was still a wilderness; it is to see laws and land and title marked by method and regulation a full century out of step (eg: Indiana, east of me, is laid out in sections; west TN does have some sections, but property nevertheless is defined by eastern meets and bounds, a convention of the eastern coast and our national infancy).

            Mr Crockett was elected to represent TN12 (defunct). I live in TN09, the final stop going west: things are numbered from east to west here because our space is, again, our time; TN01 will always be in the northeast (first) corner, as well it should be. So, if Davy represented his native county, he would have been the Congressman from TN01, TN03 at the most (I don’t find congressional maps going back that far), not TN12.

            The counties have been parceled and renamed and divvied up many times, of course. Crockett lived in my home county of Obion when he was elected. His property might have been part proper of Gibson at that date or its antecedent, Carroll. That’s TN08 country these days. His wife’s grave is at the homestead, and Crocketts remain plentiful in those parts whether upright or interred.

          2. robc

            Ky numbers from left to right, like all sensible people would, despite having the same general history as TN.

            I don’t know when that happened.

            The far west is district 1, I live in 2. Louisville is 3, Northern KY is 4, eastern is 5 and Lexington is 6. Those last 2 kind of break the pattern, but I think that is left over from the swtich from 7 to 6 districts in 1990?

          3. robc

            Just checked. The previous version had 5 in the southeasternish part, 6 was lexington, and 7 was far east. When it switched to 6, 5 and 7 were combined, with 6 taking parts of it, and some general shifting of the others.

        3. Nephilium

          One of my Senators was the first American to orbit the Earth.

          1. robc

            One of my reps threw a no hitter in both leagues.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            One of my senators is a twat.

            No…. wait… that’s both of them.

          3. Juvenile Bluster

            Same here.

          4. Gustave Lytton

            Me too

          5. mock-star

            #metoo

          6. Pope Jimbo

            One of my Senators ate salad with a comb.

          7. ChipsnSalsa

            When you say “salad”…?

        4. leon

          One of my senators was the smoot in smoot-hawley

    3. Rebel Scum

      What are you even doing here?

      Representing the wishes of the people that elected them? (Ostensibly…)

    1. Rebel Scum

      & would send chills down the spines of our Founding Fathers.

      Not likely.

      1. Heroic Mulatto

        Considering that Alexander Hamilton said the EXACT SAME THING about Albert Gallatin because he opposed central banking while having a French accent…

        POLIFACT SAYZ: Not true.

  34. The Late P Brooks

    Contempt of Congress

    Former congressman Trey Gowdy called House Democrats “feckless and irrelevant” Wednesday in response to a vote to hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress.

    “Barr is ostensibly being held in contempt for not turning over documents he has no legal obligation to turn over. In fact, it would be against the law to do so,” Gowdy said on “The Story with Martha MacCallum.”

    The House Wednesday voted to hold Barr and Ross in criminal contempt, saying they were stonewalling congressional probes into the Trump administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

    Gowdy said contempt of Congress didn’t matter after Tuesday, when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi violated House rules.

    “Nobody cares what Congress does. What we saw yesterday — they can’t even enforce their own House rules against their own members. So, there used to be a stigma attached to being held in contempt of Congress. There ain’t no more,” Gowdy said. “So, I would tell Bill Barr, ‘Your reputation as an incredible lawyer is intact. Don’t give it another thought.’”

    No more cool kids’ lunchroom table for you.

    1. R C Dean

      “Nobody cares what Congress does.”

      I know I don’t. It’s mostly decorative now, the least relevant part of government.

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        It’s pretty much the Imperial Roman Senate at this point. At least they get to keep their perks.

  35. Derpetologist

    I was going to do a Spot the Not for Tom Steyer, but I had to stop when I read this quote:

    ***
    Fossil fuels are raw materials that have to be extracted and processed. Wind and solar energy are different. The only costs associated with them are technological.
    ***

    [anguished Zoidberg groan]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7gxStnBfbg

    Fun fact: his Farallon Capital fund invested heavily in one of the largest coal mines on the planet: Maules Creek

    wiki sez

    ***
    A 2014 New York Times article said coal-mining companies which Farallon invested in or lent money to under Steyer had increased their coal production by 70 million tons annually since receiving money from Farallon, and that Steyer remained invested in the Maules Creek coal mine.
    ***

    1. The more solar and wind plants there are, the more coal will be needed to take up the slack.

      Brilliant!

    2. Heyo, sir and wow that quote was…quite the friggin doozy.

    3. Chipwooder

      Hey, you’re back!

      1. Derpetologist

        Hail to the King, baby.

        Here, have a Tom Steyer quote:

        ***
        Tax cuts for the rich defund the critical public programs on which American families depend.

        ***

    4. leon

      Kenecott Copper or GTFO

  36. The Late P Brooks

    Gowdy argued that the House of Representatives has lost its power under Democratic leadership.

    “Congress has worked itself into obscurity [and] irrelevance. When you can go on the floor of the House as the presidents say ‘I’m going to do it with or without you,’ and Congress stands up and cheers, you have rendered that branch of government feckless and irrelevant,” Gowdy said. “Congratulations. The House doesn’t matter anymore. White House and Senate [matter], House doesn’t matter.”

    Oh, come on. They’re entertaining to watch, like a bunch of clowns running around bonking each other on the head with giant plastic Fred Flintstone clubs.

    1. Juvenile Bluster

      Trump’s going to win in a landslide next year, isn’t he?

      1. Among actual voters, probably.

        It’ll look like a squeaker due to the margin of fraud.

      2. Chipwooder

        If he does, will the reaction be an even more hilarious explosion of anger and tears, or just glum resignation?

        1. Juvenile Bluster

          The former. Definitely the former.

          1. Pope Jimbo

            Yup. And I wouldn’t even be surprised to see the Russians blamed again (with another special prosecutor too).

        2. When Bush II won his second (and horrible) term, I thought, at the time, it would finally shut the Dems up about his “illegal” (Florida, hanging chads) presidency. I learned a lot about politics since.

          1. Chipwooder

            DIEBOLD VOTING MACHINES!!1!

          2. Not Adahn

            According to the MSM, there hasn’t been a Republican legitimately elected president since Reagan.

        3. Tantrums.

          Definatley more tantrums.

        4. Rebel Scum

          Well, the screeching hasn’t ceased but has escalated perpetually, so…

    2. ChipsnSalsa

      bonking each other on the head with giant plastic Fred Flintstone clubs.

      Do they have to be plastic?

  37. Are same-sex couples being denied mortgages? A study says they are.

    The research, conducted at Iowa State University and published this spring in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that same-sex couples were up to 73 percent more likely to be denied mortgages and that they paid interest rates as much as 0.2 percent higher.

    The finding, which looks at transactions dating as far back as 1990, has raised concerns among civil rights activists, who say it highlights a problem that is difficult to spot. Discrimination in mortgage lending can be impossible for even its victims to detect reliably.

    “You get turned down, and it’s not like they tell you, ‘We’re turning you down because you’re a same-sex couple,’ ’’ said Karen L. Loewy, senior counsel at Lambda Legal, which advocates for the LGBT community and people with HIV. “The reasons that folks are given are usually more innocuous, and I think folks don’t generally suspect that discrimination is playing a role.’’

    Some in the mortgage industry, however, say they are skeptical that the effect of discrimination is as pronounced as the study suggests — especially in Massachusetts, a national leader in LGBTQ protections and the first state to grant marriage rights to same-sex couples.

    It’s all that Miata buying, clothes, and pansy flowers. It adds up.

    1. Let me guess, they’re not comparing like financial situations.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      dating as far back as 1990

      That’s the catch.

      Until recently, same-sex couples were not contractually married in the eyes of the law, this affects the financial risk of issuing a mortgage to them jointly just like it would any other unmarried couple.

      I’ll bet that if they looked at mortgage statistics for homosexual singles, they’re indistinguishable from heterosexual.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Or just look at mortgage statistics after same sex marriage became the law of the land.

        1. robc

          Or compare same sex couples before the law to unamrried couples.

    3. R C Dean

      “transactions dating as far back as 1990”

      They had to go back thirty years to get their “data” to say what they wanted?

      Why the fuck would any financial institution refuse to take gay people’s money?

    4. The Last American Hero

      Of course, it goes back to 1990, or 25 years before same sex marriage was legal nationwide, so it totes represents how things work now.

    5. Pope Jimbo

      Maybe one of the other factors is that those homos are the tip of the spear when it comes to gentrification. Some of those rejections might be because they were asking for loans in a super shitty part of town. Bankers might not be all that thrilled to end up with a shitty building in a shitty part of town if they have to foreclose?

    6. Rhywun

      looks at transactions dating as far back as 1990

      Yeah, that’s fair. IFLS!

  38. Juvenile Bluster

    This isn’t getting any play in the US media for some reason (no guns?), but at least 33 dead in arson at animation studio in Kyoto, Japan

    Kyoto Animation is a pretty legendary animation studio. This fucking sucks.

    1. Is there no end of evil in the world?

      1. Juvenile Bluster

        Who looks at the actual links?

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Jimmy Dean?

    2. Tejicano

      I have often made the argument that even without guns a person could commit horrendous mass murder with exactly what this guy used. I believe it is the shooting scenes in movies which motivate insane people in the US who are bent on mass murder to choose guns. If they put a little more independent thought to it there are many simpler and more effective methods.

      And I could be proven wrong but I don’t expect that even knee-jerk Japan will try to restrict gas cans or gasoline sales to people with gas cans.

      1. Not Adahn

        But if we do that, we can finally begin to free people from the shackles of the automobile-industrial complex!

        And really, if it saves just one life…

      2. peachy rex

        I lived in Sri Lanka during the civil war. During my residence, in Colombo alone the Tigers got the President, the Minister of Defence, the commander of the Navy, a chunk of Armed Forces HQ, and a depressing pile of bystanders and commuters (almost including me). Aside from the Navy CO, every attack was car or suicide bombs.

      3. Gadfly

        If they put a little more independent thought to it there are many simpler and more effective methods.

        Of course. The deadliest school massacre in US history was not a shooting, it was a bombing. The deadliest non-school massacres have generally involved bombs as well.

  39. The Late P Brooks

    “I don’t think it works that you say, ‘We’re going to have a safe space for people who have been kicked off of other platforms because their speech is hateful and we promise that this safe space is going to be really civilized.’ How does that work? There is no such thing as civilized hate speech.”

    Something something working backwards from the conclusion.

  40. The Late P Brooks

    “You get turned down, and it’s not like they tell you, ‘We’re turning you down because you’re a same-sex couple,’ ’’ said Karen L. Loewy, senior counsel at Lambda Legal, which advocates for the LGBT community and people with HIV. “The reasons that folks are given are usually more innocuous, and I think folks don’t generally suspect that discrimination is playing a role.’’

    All that hocus-pocus about whether or not you’d be able to pay the money back was just a smokescreen for their kkkorporate homophobia.

    1. The Last American Hero

      And yet when the next crash comes we will hear no end of greedy bankers handing out loans like candy.

      1. A loan that never gets repaid* is worthless to the lender.

        *favors or in-kind payments still count as a type of repayment.

  41. The Late P Brooks

    A True American Hero

    Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who died at the age of 99 on Tuesday, was a Republican appointed by President Gerald Ford. But Stevens took a position that would make even many liberals blush: He called for repealing the Second Amendment.

    Stevens made the argument for repeal in a New York Times op-ed last year, in response to the March for Our Lives movement that came out of the Parkland, Florida, school shooting. He argued that for most of US history, the Second Amendment was interpreted narrowly — not placing a strict limit on federal or state governments’ ability to regulate firearms. But that changed recently, when the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms, Stevens wrote:

    In 2008, the Supreme Court overturned Chief Justice Burger’s and others’ long-settled understanding of the Second Amendment’s limited reach by ruling, in District of Columbia v. Heller, that there was an individual right to bear arms. I was among the four dissenters.

    That decision — which I remain convinced was wrong and certainly was debatable — has provided the N.R.A. with a propaganda weapon of immense power. Overturning that decision via a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple and would do more to weaken the N.R.A.’s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option.

    ——

    The Supreme Court’s new reading of the Second Amendment reflects that [changed interpretation]. And from Stevens’s view, it created such an untenable position that he argued the amendment must be repealed.

    Blah blah blah guns are bad and nobody who doesn’t work for the all-knowing all-seeing government should be allowed to have one. Gun confiscation is the only way to save the nation.

    Stevens said it, it must be true.

    TW: Vox

    1. Chipwooder

      They’re more than welcome to try to amend the Constitution to repeal the Second Amendment. They never actually try to do so. Why? Because they know damned well that it would never happen.

    2. commodious spittoon

      has provided the N.R.A. with a propaganda weapon of immense power

      Not to mention all the gun owners who can, you know, avoid being locked up for exercising their right.

      1. commodious spittoon

        Seriously, what’s with his obsession with the NRA? I mean, say what you want about the wisdom or legal reasoning of RvW, but if a critic said that it gives a powerful propaganda weapon to Planned Parenthood, it would A) be a hackneyed turn of phrase, and B) ignore the much greater effect of guaranteeing legal access to abortion. Maybe the critic thinks that’s nothing more than butchering fetuses, much like gun grabbers conflate gun ownership with shooting up schoolchildren, but that makes the propaganda argument even more trivial and pointless.

        1. Chipwooder

          Because the leftists are collectivists who can’t comprehend that anyone is capable of doing something without a rigid hierarchy directing them. That’s the way their side works, so they assume everyone is like that.

    3. A Leap at the Wheel

      I don’t like speaking ill of the dead, but for a few people, I’ll make exceptions.

    4. Rebel Scum

      He argued that for most of US history, the Second Amendment was interpreted narrowly — not placing a strict limit on federal or state governments’ ability to regulate firearms.

      Then I wonder how firearms became so integral to american society.

      1. Don Escaped Texas

        common use: which usually had zero to do with militia

        Recent rulings notwithstanding, your right to anything, even guns, is better explained (not created!) by the 9A, which could have just as easily been written: fuck off, slaver

        1. leon

          I agree with you that the irks me when someone says: you don’t have a right to own/do X when clearly I do and the government clearly has no power to do so.

          That said I don’t believe the idea that the second amendment was about the ability of the state to arm a militia.

          1. Rebel Scum

            It says the “right of the people…shall not be infringed” in contrast to the “militia”.

      2. Not Adahn

        Which is why the NFA was passed in 1794.

        1. I thought it was the Militia act.

    5. Derpetologist

      Fun facts; The British NRA predates the US one. Wiki sez

      ***
      The National Rifle Association was founded in 1859,[1] based on Putney Heath & Wimbledon Common, 12 years before its better known American cousin.
      ***

      Larf!

      The US NRA was founded because it was discovered that Union soldiers for firing about 1,000 rounds for every dead Confederate.

      You’d think liberals would be in favor of an organization founded for the purpose of killing white male Southerners.

      wiki sez

      ***
      The National Rifle Association was first chartered in the State of New York on November 16, 1871[1][7] by Army and Navy Journal editor William Conant Church and Captain George Wood Wingate. On November 25, 1871, the group voted to elect its first corporate officers. Union Army Civil War General Ambrose Burnside, who had worked as a Rhode Island gunsmith, was elected president.[18] When Burnside resigned on August 1, 1872,[19] Church succeeded him as president.[20]

      Union Army records for the Civil War indicate that its troops fired about 1,000 rifle shots for each Confederate hit, causing General Burnside to lament his recruits: “Out of ten soldiers who are perfect in drill and the manual of arms, only one knows the purpose of the sights on his gun or can hit the broad side of a barn.”[21][22][23] The generals attributed this to the use of volley tactics, devised for earlier, less accurate smoothbore muskets.
      ***

    6. Rebel Scum

      a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple

      Then go for it.

    7. leon

      What are his feelings on Warren v DC?

    8. Gustave Lytton

      JPS- a scummy justice who used the power of the state to crush individuals, or at least attempt to.

    9. Old Man With Candy

      Stevens is one more reason I’m glad that I voted against Ford.

      Not that the guy who won was any better…

    10. ruodberht

      I’ve said it before, but one thing that sticks out to me about Stevens…

      He was on the majority in Deshaney v. Winnebago County, which said, essentially, that the government has no duty to protect you.

      He also dissented in Heller. So, he said, essentially, that you have no right to protect yourself.

      That’s some evil shit.

    11. Gadfly

      He argued that for most of US history, the Second Amendment was interpreted narrowly — not placing a strict limit on federal or state governments’ ability to regulate firearms. But that changed recently, when the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms

      Let’s see what Justice Story, appointed to the Court by the “Father of the Constitution” James Madison, says about this in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States:

      The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.

      Seems to indicate an individual right to me. As to the purpose of the militia, rather than restraining the people’s use of arms, it was thought necessary to encourage it:

      How it is practicable to keep the people duly armed without some organization, it is difficult to see.

  42. A Leap at the Wheel

    Well folks. I’ve hit a new low. I’m now officially bangin one of the church ladies.

    1. Your wife joined a church?

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        is now employed by the church which we attend. Attending a church is not enough to be considered a church lady.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Do you still make her practice kneeling at home? I can borrow you some papal vestments if you are interested in spicing up your love life a bit….

          1. Tundra

            Ew. Used vestments.

            Gross, dude.

        2. pistoffnick

          Does she make coffee cake? I will forever associate basement church ladies with coffee cake

          1. ron73440

            Does she make coffee cake? I will forever associate basement church ladies with coffee cake

            That’s an odd euphemism.

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            She doesn’t do the baking for the church, she cooks (or at least plans) most of the meals, because this is MN and people are shit cooks around here.

          3. robc

            “No one north of I-10 can cook worth a fuck.”

            Quote from a cajun* on another site from about a decade ago.

            *or some sort of Louisiana dweller.

          4. Based upon my sampling of cuisines from vast swathes of territory north of I-10, I know I can disregard anything he has to say.

          5. Don Escaped Texas

            cooking quality generally diminishes as one heads north

            and the quality of schools generally diminishes in proportion to their distance from the Canadian boarder – Moynihan

          6. I’m not sure what Moynihan was trying to say, but the New York public schools I attended were shit.

          7. Tundra

            That’s horseshit.

            I’ve had great meals and terrible meals everywhere.

          8. robc

            I know it is wrong, I just was amused by how little space had quality food according to him.

  43. leon

    I’m on safari, and the up/down arrows are gone. Is this the same for everyone?

    1. I’m not in the African bush, and the arrows are missing here.

    2. Pope Jimbo

      If I was on safari, I would use a large bore rifle, not arrows (up, down or sideways). But you be you. I guess the Lions (African and NFL) got to get a win every once in a while).

  44. The Late P Brooks

    I’m on safari, and the up/down arrows are gone. Is this the same for everyone?

    Tell that elephant to get his own damn pajamas.

  45. The Late P Brooks

    More:

    At the same time, much of the evidence suggests that the US will at some point need to go further on guns than much of the current discussion suggests. The research indicates that the core problem in the US is it simply has too many firearms. The current policy proposals don’t do much to address this core problem.

    It’s straightforward: Everywhere in the world, people get into arguments. Every country has residents who are dangerous to themselves or others because of mental illness. Every country has bigots and extremists. But here, it’s uniquely easy for a person to obtain a gun, letting otherwise tense but nonlethal conflicts escalate into deadly violence.

    Universal background checks wouldn’t address this. Even an assault weapons ban wouldn’t, because the great majority of shootings — 70-plus percent of gun homicides, for instance — involve a handgun. That’s why I’ve argued for tighter restrictions on all guns, including up to all semiautomatic weapons or at least some types of handguns, and a buyback program that would confiscate these guns out of circulation (much like Australia did).

    Much of that is not politically realistic today. But just as Democrats have over the years shifted debates over health care, climate change, college, and taxes on the ultrawealthy, they could get a similar discussion rolling on guns too. Perhaps Stevens’s call to repeal the Second Amendment is one way to get that conversation going, demonstrating that this is a view at least some respectable, mainstream legal scholars hold.

    If nothing else, it could help balance the scales. The NRA has successfully worked against policies, like universal background checks, that are enormously popular with the US public. Perhaps an equal counterweight on the other side could, overall, push the country closer to the middle ground that most Americans already support.

    Take the mask off. Reveal yourself.

    “Now that you mention it, we really do want to take all your guns away, you goddam deplorables. Get on your knees.”

    1. Rebel Scum

      a buyback program that would confiscate

      So you agree that “buyback” is a misnomer and really means compensated confiscation. Now we are getting somewhere.

      that are enormously popular

      Popularity is not a justification for the government to violate its founding charter.

    2. Tejicano

      “confiscate these guns out of circulation (much like Australia did).”

      Last I checked they still only got about 20% compliance on that law passed more than 20 years ago.

  46. Tundra

    Good (late) morning SP and the assembled horde!

    Thanks for the lynx and for one of my fave rock bands. They are coming here in September, but I don’t think I can bear to watch them so old.

    I’d rather remember them like this.

    1. Tejicano

      Reagan cut his teeth as a radio announcer – there is no question that he knew the mike was live when he made that “joke”. It was his way of poking the bear to see their reaction. Dangerous, yes – and probably foolhardy. But it did give us vital intelligence on how they would respond and what their capabilities were.

      Cold war games were so much fun!

  47. Chipwooder

    I remember when right-thinking people scoffed at the notion that the left was trying to mainstream pedophilia. And then…..

      1. and a song for you Navy men

    1. wdalasio

      Is it any surprise? The pre-pubescent “drag kid” was featured on Good Morning America. Because we can all be sure the folks at Disney would be nothing but supportive if Bubba from Mississippi took his pre-pubescent daughter to dance provocatively for the customers of the local strip club.

      1. I’m wondering the odds that the customers would proceed to bludgeon Bubba into a bloody mess.

        1. wdalasio

          I suspect they would. As the target audience should do to “drag kid’s” mother, if they have any self respect.

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        That was straight up disgusting.

        That kid is being pimped out by his parents and the media has celebrated it.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          And let’s be clear. They’re celebrating it because they want to be seen as a friend to a minority that is perceived as oppressed. Their desire to virtue signal has led them to celebrating the overt sexualization of children by their own parents for profit. It’s sick.

          1. wdalasio

            They’re celebrating it because they want to be seen as a friend to a minority that is perceived as oppressed.

            That’s the part I don’t get. For years we’ve been told, in no uncertain terms, that homosexuality has nothing to do with pedophilia. The entire act here seems to fly in the face of that claim.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            I sense a split in the homosexual community over this. The “queers” are running the show now and to them, anything goes, particularly if it’s offensive to “mainstream America”. It’s only a matter of time before we see more and more of a divide between those who think that moral human behavior should have some limits and the lunatics.

          3. Don Escaped Texas

            probably so

            there’s always a split coming in everything, even when churches merge

            I argue this all the time with leftists: if you’re platform is #resist instead of principle, then you’ll have crazy people in your tent just because they #resist too. When you take up principle and abandon #resist, then it no longer matters what collective you identify as . . . should such a world ever arise

          4. Don Escaped Texas

            * cringes *

            that thing I did: will Ted’S see ?

          5. Rhywun

            The “community” was taken over by Marxists in a process that was more or less complete by 2000 or so. Same as many other American institutions.

      3. Heroic Mulatto

        Bubba from Mississippi took his pre-pubescent daughter to dance provocatively for the customers

        I’m pretty sure that’s already called “the child beauty pageant circuit.”

        1. Chipwooder

          Yep, which is equally disturbing. The difference is that most media types covered the child beauty pageant circuit in a fairly negative light (and rightly so IMO) while cheerleading for the drag princesses.

          1. Heroic Mulatto

            Well, there is a class element at play.

        2. Not Adahn

          -1 JonBenet

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      “according to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable orientation….”

      Oooooooo…. can I try?

      According to current research, murderous feelings are an unchangeable orientation.

      1. Rhywun

        I saw that episode of Star Trek.

    3. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Sodom and Gomorrah, here we come.

    4. I agree with the general sentiment that it’s probably genetically coded into some unfortunate individuals (probably much like zoophilia). As long as those thoughts and feelings remain only thoughts and feelings and don’t translate to actions, it’s none of my business. I’m not in the habit of policing people’s thoughts.

      HOWEVER, this whole “let’s celebrate it!” bullshit and trying to equate it with healthy sexual drive is beyond absurd. It’s NOT normal. It’s NOT healthy. It SHOULDN’T be celebrated and/or accepted. People who have those thoughts and feelings SHOULD be distressed by them and try to get treatment.

      This also dovetails into the absurdity of outlawing child-like sex dolls. If you truly have these immutable sexual urges, you know you can’t act them out morally, then I can see how tortured such a person might be. Give them a damn child sex doll so they can satisfy those urges harmlessly!

      1. Rhywun

        Yep. The move to excuse/tolerate/celebrate everything as “genetically predisposed” is a way to avoid making any moral choices.

        1. Don Escaped Texas

          bravo

          it can’t be put any better or more plainly than that

      2. Chipwooder

        100% in agreement. I don’t doubt that a deep-seated pedophilic urge is a horrible thing for someone to be afflicted by and, revolted as I may be by such people, there should be a clear bright line separating urges and fantasies from actual actions, but those actions will always be an abomination.

        And yeah, if a kiddie doll can help, then I don’t see a problem with it.

        1. there should be a clear bright line separating urges and fantasies from actual actions

          SHITLORD SUPREMACIST BIGOT!!!,,!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    5. Heroic Mulatto

      It’s a TEDx talk. Any retard can give one.

      1. Chipwooder

        Fair enough. I never watch TED anything so I don’t know the particulars of these things, just have a vague notion that they’re some kind of would-be intellectual thing.

      2. ChipsnSalsa

        Snopes calls this True

        1. Heroic Mulatto

          See?

  48. The Late P Brooks

    Not Fair

    New Jersey is suing the Internal Revenue Service, challenging new rules that would block states’ attempts to get around a new $10,000 cap for state and local tax deductions.

    The state’s governor, Democrat Phil Murphy, announced the lawsuit on Wednesday morning, naming Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin among the defendants.

    “As I said when the IRS rule was finalized in June, it was nothing more than a gut punch to the middle-class New Jersey families who know that the Trump tax plan is a complete sham,” Murphy said at a press conference in South Orange, New Jersey.

    “It was a complete and total utter politicization of the federal tax code,” he said.

    You can’t weaponize the tax code for political gain. That’s our job.

    1. If your taxes are so atrocious that “Middle Class” New Jersey residents are paying over $10,000 a year in state and local taxes – fuck you, cut spending.

      1. Drake

        I’m paying $12k in property taxes and whatever the hell 6.37% of our joint income is.

        1. I pay $2-3k, I’d have to check my last statement.

          What’s the assessed value on your property?

          1. Drake

            I don’t remember. Probably in the neighborhood of $450k.

          2. Sensei

            Sometimes I feel like I’m the only one in Essex County paying taxes.

            Newark mayor’s wife, who was caught dodging taxes, just got more probation time

          3. Drake

            She sounds nice.

          4. ron73440

            Jumah works as a legislative aide for Assemblywoman Cleopatra Tucker, D-28th Dist. Tucker’s son, Kiburi Tucker, was Jumah’s business parter. He is currently serving an eight-year prison sentence for embezzling $332,116 from The Centre, Inc., a nonprofit started by his father, and lying about his six-figure consulting income, gleaned in part from political campaigns in Newark and Orange.

            My first thought was: How bad did he have to screw up to get 8 years?

            Then I saw he stole from his father’s “nonprofit”.

          5. ChipsnSalsa

            Linda Jumah, 37, appeared before U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton more than a year after her probation officer alleged she came home later than allowed and attended social events without permission for her job as a legislative aide.

            How do you get a job as a legislative aide with an active criminal record? I hate this stuff.

        2. I pay ~$7k a year, and that’s considered outrageous in this part of the state. A few extra hundred bucks on the mortgage payment keeps a lot of buyers out of this suburb.

        3. Don Escaped Texas

          and excise fees on local purchases, so at least 5% on a quarter of income?

    2. Drake

      Murphy is a such a cringe-inducing idiot. He was all pissy a few weeks ago when the legislature would pass a millionaire’s tax to chase more people out of the state. But he’s mad when the exact same people can’t write-off their $30k in property taxes.

      1. Drake

        would not

      2. Sensei

        We can make it all up with various taxes on firearm ownership!

    3. Consider that, in 2016, New Yorkers writing off state and local taxes took an average SALT deduction of $21,779

      While the vast majority of people took the standard deduction, and didn’t need to itemize.

      1. Certified Public Asshat

        They really should have just scrapped itemized deductions and moved everyone to standard…but then what would we fight about?

      2. Rhywun

        I guesstimated that you had to be making somewhere north of $125K in order to be impacted by the SALT cap. Granted, that sort of income doesn’t go as far in those areas of the state that are most impacted by Democrat policies which raise the cost of living. I wonder why they aren’t addressing that side of the equation.

        1. ron73440

          I was in the NY/NJ area a few months ago for work and tolls were $135 on a Mon-Fri trip.

          That and the stupid gas pumping law kind of blew my mind.

          The clerk came out after I had already started pumping and was impressed that I could handle the credit card panel and fuel my own car.

          1. Chipwooder

            When we drive up to Long Island to visit my family, it costs almost $100 in tolls just for that one-way trip. The return trip is less, but still nothing to sneeze at.

          2. I took a wrong turn that resulted in me crossing the border into New Jersey. It cost me $1 to get back out.

          3. Chipwooder

            Entering NJ is free, but they always charge you to leave. It’s true for the Outerbridge Crossing, the Goethals Bridge, and the GWB in NY, the Ben Franklin Bridge in PA, and the Delaware Memorial Bridge in DE.

          4. There is at least one crossing without a toll, but I was on I-80 and needed to meet people at a Diner within the next half hour or so.

          5. The Diner was in Pennsylvania.

          6. Brett L

            Entering NJ is free, but they always charge you to leave

            Talk about knowing your market.

          7. Don Escaped Texas

            free Cascadia !

            but, seriously, I think you can pump your own gas in Portland now

          8. Tejicano

            STEVE SMITH PUMP YOUR GAS TOO. AND BY PUMP YOUR GAS MEAN…

        2. Don Escaped Texas

          Am I missing something?

          The change for some is to $10k from $22 in deductions, so $12k
          on which those folks pay 25% or so ?

          so this squabble is about $3k net increase in taxes, a rounding error on living in NY or NJ ?

          There are millions of things that hurt those folks more than $3k that no one is doing anything about, aren’t there?

    4. Not Adahn

      Why should I get to pay less in Federal income tax than if I lived in Florida?

  49. Tundra

    What exactly is this chick’s job, anyway?

    ILHAN OMAR INTRODUCES PRO-BDS RESOLUTION, ANNOUNCES VISIT TO ISRAEL

    What the hell does any of that have to do with the 5th District in Minne?

    1. Psh, she wasn’t elected to actually, you know, represent the interests of her constituents. She was elected to be a communist activist and crush her constituens under an iron shod boot.

    2. Rebel Scum

      She represents party ideologues, not the people that elected her.

    3. Chipwooder

      When all you have is a hammer yadda yadda

  50. The Late P Brooks

    “confiscate these guns out of circulation (much like Australia did).”

    Last I checked they still only got about 20% compliance on that law passed more than 20 years ago.

    Shush, you. You’re just muddying the waters. Once we pass the law, all guns will magically vaporize.

    1. or gun owners will criminalized. Defend yourself with a gun? That’s a prison sentence.

      1. Tejicano

        “it seems shovel sales spiked after than ban was put in effect. I wonder why?”

        1. Brett L

          “Here in Florida over a million guns have been reported lost in boating accidents. Will no one think of the manatee?”

          1. Forget the Manatee, it’s the heavily armed Meth Gators you have to think about now.

    2. Tejicano

      I know that manually loaded firearms we not banned so theoretically there should still be ammo sales for those. But I wonder, if there was some way to estimate how many firearms were not banned, if current ammo sales would seem out of proportion to the number of manually loaded firearms supposedly in circulation.

      I was down there (in Australia) just a couple months ago. When I make it back I might just wander into a gun store and strike up a conversation just to steer it towards this idea.

    3. Gustave Lytton

      Only criminals have guns in Australia.

    4. Chipwooder

      What was the number of guns turned in recently in New Zealand? Something like 300?

      1. Raston Bot

        i saw 700…

        out of an estimated 2,000,000 now-illegal firearms.

        1. Tejicano

          Whoa! Those boats must be flipping right out of the water. I blame climate change!

  51. RE: pr0n doxxing.

    One might be tempted to say that these girls were horrendously naïve for thinking videos of them having sex with strangers wouldn’t make it to the internet. You’d be mostly right.

    However, if doxxing anonymous political meme creators is wrong, doxxing these women is wrong too (hell, doxxing in general is wrong). Even though 18 is legal adulthood, on average people that age are incredibly stupid. I frequently thank G-d that smartphones/the internet weren’t around when I was an adolescent with all the stupid stuff my friends and I did. Youthful stupidity shouldn’t define a person for life, but that’s the world we live in. I don’t know what is to be done though, the toothpaste isn’t going back in the tube. All someone can do is try to educate young people that no matter how fun/harmless/exciting something may seem in the moment, you need to remember that it will be out there forever. Like I read once from a porn actor, if you can’t handle your grandmother seeing it, don’t do it, because she probably will someday.

    1. Or worse, you might see your grandmother.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      While I agree with you that doxxing is wrong, you really shouldn’t put your face out there if you don’t want it to happen to you.

      There’s a presumption that those who remain behind an alias and do not show pictures of themselves desire to remain anonymous. If I run out screaming into the street buck naked, it’s unlikely anyone will respect my wishes to remain unknown.

      1. Certified Public Asshat

        you really shouldn’t put your face out there if you don’t want it to happen to you.

        What are we talking about again?

    3. Chipwooder

      Doxxing is absolutely wrong and I don’t blame these women for being upset about it. That said, how goddamned stupid and gullible do you have to be to put yourself in this position? Anyone who consents to be filmed in the act who doesn’t assume that the video is going to be watched by viewers she/he never intended is either dumb as a brick or willfully naive, or both.

      1. Chipwooder

        BTW, on a shitlord note, it’s amazing to me how attractive a lot of the girls in those videos are. You’d think that, if they wanted the money that badly, they’d just put out for sugar daddies.

        1. But those guys are old, and keep wanting additional attention.

    4. wdalasio

      My problem is that when does it become self-doxxing. My impression is that these girls willingly and knowingly starred in a porn video. The only thing they were misled about was the extent of the distribution. So, they want to be porn stars but not be recognized as porn stars. At least when its inconvenient.

      1. wdalasio

        The example that comes closest to political doxxing would be someone who makes themselves very well known for a political cause getting upset that she gets fired because her boss found out about the cause.

    5. Brett L

      I’ve got an idea. Let’s just blame the government. If the names and government identification of every actor and actress who acts in a porn didn’t have to be made publicly available upon request, it might be juuuuust a little bit harder to dox these women.

  52. Rebel Scum

    Cocaine Mitch

    “I think it’s time to lore the rhetoric related to that subject all across America – everyone knows that’s nonsense,” McConnell replied to Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo when addressed with the accusation.

    “I was there when Martin Luther King gave that ‘I Have A Dream’ speech. I was there as an observer when President Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act,” McConnell continued. “Look, I’ve got nothing to apologize [for] on this front. We ought to tone rhetoric down across the country. Throwing around words like racism, routinely applying it to almost everything – let’s talk about the issues.”..

    “[The Squad] wants to take America into a socialist country – I think it’s important to remember that you don’t need to have a military coup to have a socialist country, most countries have voted it in,” McConnell said. “ …They’re giving away free this, free that, free that – who do you think is going to pay for that? All the rest of the productive parts of society. So, the president’s on to something here.”..

    “[The president] is right about the Squad wanting to turn us into a socialist country, [but] what he should have added, however, is that it’s a lot broader than just the four of them,” McConnell said, noting that prominent Democrats such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the majority of 2020 Democratic presidential candidates have embraced socialist programs like the Green New Deal and Medicare-for-All.

    “We’re having a big debate now and next year about what we want America to be like. Do we really think socialism applies here? At a time of great prosperity, 50 year low unemployment?” he continued. “That’s what the election, I think, is going to be about.”..

    “We have to make an argument, that’s what a campaign is about – we have to make the argument,” McConnell said. “If we can’t successfully make the case against that kind of stuff, we ought to go into another line of work.”

    1. GOP PACs should spend their money getting this exact message far and wide. Ads with a background video of suffering proles in Socialist utopiae and a foreground of the various prog proposals and how well they went in various other Socialist countries.

  53. Juvenile Bluster

    Due to a water main break, we have zero water pressure at all here at work. This is a good enough excuse to work from home for the afternoon, right?

    1. Only if you listen to people like OSHA.

    2. Chipwooder

      You work? The hell kind of Glib are you?

    3. Tejicano

      Tell whoever it might be who has authority to send you home that you are having bowel issues and would rather not stink up the office.

    4. Don Escaped Texas

      not to endorse overarching government, but it’s unlikely that it’s even legal for you to remain at work under such conditions

      1. MikeS

        That is my understanding. Either they get porta-potties there ASAP, or they have to send everyone home.

        So, I suggest getting the hell out of there before the porta-potty delivery trailer gets there.

    5. Drake

      Last time something like that happened, we all got a message from building management that it was okay to use the toilets, just don’t flush. Somebody replied to all asking how he could prevent the automatic toilets from flushing. Funny stuff.

    6. Raston Bot

      drop an upper decker and get back to us.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        This is the correct answer

  54. Tejicano

    Going OT…

    I have been thinking about writing up some contributions for the site. Not sure how much interest in the ideas I have.

    One would be a one or two issue write-up on the Japanese sword. Just a kinda potpourri of facts and historic tidbits.

    The other would be a series on my backpacking trip across the face of the Eurasian continent from Paris to Hongkong in 1993.

    Any interest?

    1. Sensei

      Heck – either sounds interesting to me.

      My suggestion is shorter articles and simply split it into parts.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      Yes to both!

    3. If I’ve learned anything is that there are few topics that won’t be of interest to this crowd, or at least a substantive subset of it.

      1. MikeS

        This ^ There is a very wide range of interests here, and also a large number of people who like learning for learning’s sake.

    4. Hammercorps

      I’ve had an idea rolling around in my head for some articles about random obscure historical that I think are interesting. If anybody’s interested I could write those up as well.

      1. MikeS

        Do it

    5. Brett L

      Yes!

      1. Tejicano

        OK, well… I’ve been committing both topics to ASCII over the past couple days to see what the scope might be while shaking the dust and cobwebs off my memory on these subjects. I’m a bit surprised at all the details I can still remember about my journey. And the information from a half-century of interest in blades in general and Japanese blades in specific seem to snowball – so I will endeavor to keep those down to points of something more than nerd-level interest.

    6. Slammer

      I’d read the backpack trip for sure

    7. leon

      Both sound cool

    8. Tundra

      Both, por favor!

    9. Heck I once an article about honey, and I don’t even keep bees or have an interest in honey production. It was more of a moral of government intervention.

  55. The Late P Brooks

    However, if doxxing anonymous political meme creators is wrong, doxxing these women is wrong too (hell, doxxing in general is wrong).

    Unquestionably true. But a woman who flies cross country with the expressed intent to fuck a stranger (for money?) on camera is on pretty shaky ground, outrage-wise.

    I have more sympathy for “girlfriend porn victims” who engaged in acts which both parties agreed at the time were to be kept private, only to have them released into the wild, afterwards.

  56. The Late P Brooks

    Also-

    As a heartless cynical bastard, I cannot help wondering whether that pornhub lawsuit is driven less by shame and remorse than by a desire to get a better cut of the action.

  57. The Late P Brooks

    I am (mostly) blissfully ignorant about this stuff, but it also seems that a great deal of doxxing drama boils down to the *wrong people* retweeting stuff to other *wrong people*.

    “Well, yeah, of course I was making fun of you hicks, but only for the amusement of my friends. Don’t make me take responsibility for my actions. That’s not fair.”

  58. Tulip

    Police Don’t Catch Serial Rapists because they don’t investigate. More than 7000 untested kits in Cleveland.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/an-epidemic-of-disbelief/592807/

    And FUCK this guy
    “Thank God we have DNA,” Dan Clark, one of the Cleveland investigators, says. “Because trying to put together a pattern where there is no pattern is impossible. It’s no wonder we didn’t catch that many people.”

    You didn’t catch many people because you didn’t do your job.

  59. Am I sorry, kids?

    Was the plug-in I need to use for the top, bottom, next, previous links on the left side updated and broke? Not just for us, but for everyone who uses it? Is it back now, kinda sorta and will it stay that way? Do I really have any more time to devote to this today?

    1. ChipsnSalsa

      She’s gone into full judge Nap mode!