Author: Jarflax

  • Checks and Balances

    Civics 101: The United States of America is a Constitutional Republic, set up as a federation, with the federal government divided into three branches with separated, enumerated powers, and additional specific limits on the exercise of those enumerated powers.

    I think that single sentence is a fair synopsis of the intention of the framers of the Constitution, but what did they mean by that? And what does it mean today in practice?

    First we have to understand some of the terms in use:

    Sovereignty is the authority of a state to govern itself independent of any outside source of authority. In a monarchy the king is sovereign and all authority ultimately comes from the crown.

     

    A Republic is form of government in which the sovereignty lies with some portion of the citizenry, not in a Monarch. A Republic is not necessarily democratic; the portion of the citizenry holding the sovereign power may be a small minority, but it can be democratic, if the portion of the citizenry holding sovereignty is extensive.

     

    A constitution is a framework law, supreme over all other laws in the state, and which sets limits on those other laws and establishes the procedures for their creation and enforcement.

    A Constitutional Republic is a state that has a republican form of government subject to the limitations, procedures, and powers set out in a constitution.

     

    A Federation is a sovereign conglomerate state made up of other states, provinces, or administrative districts which either retain, if the federation was from the bottom up with sovereign states coming together, or are granted, if the federation was from the top down with a sovereign state dividing itself, some portion of, but less than all, sovereignty.

     

    Enumerated powers are limited sovereignty. In a government of enumerated powers the State is sovereign only with regard to those areas enumerated in some list; the remainder of the sovereignty resides elsewhere.

     

    The General Police Power, is the largest component of sovereignty. It is the authority of a government to declare various actions criminal and set forth punishments for those acts in order to promote the morality, safety and health of the populace. As such it is limited only by the power and whim of the sovereign. Libertarians generally regard the General Police Power with disfavor, preferring enumerated police powers limited to policing direct harms to the person, property, or liberty of another, but historically the General Police Power has extended to any objective desired by the sovereign.

    In 1787 a Constitutional Convention was called into session and created the system of government that persists (however weakly) to this day. The framers of the United States Constitution were attempting to sail between the Scylla of the newborn Nation dividing into 13 completely independent polities and the Charybdis of a centralized Leviathan. The 13 States were sovereign and the prior federation under the Articles of Confederation explicitly recognized that sovereignty. The federal ‘government’ under the articles had almost no independent authority to act and it acted more as a standing conference of the States than as a sovereign power. It rapidly became clear that something more was needed to prevent the 13 States from going their own ways, although it is less clear that such a separate development would have been the disaster feared at the time.

    The Federal Government that came out of that convention had sovereignty over matters set out in Article 1, section 8:

    1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

    2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

    3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

    4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

    5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

    6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

    7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

    8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

    9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

    10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

    11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

    12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

    13: To provide and maintain a Navy;

    14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

    15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

    16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

    17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—

    And

    18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

    The very next section of Article 1, makes it abundantly plain that the power of the Federal Government is limited to the enumerated powers and is not general, and that it is subject to other additional limits even when being used according to a section 8 power:

    1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

    2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

    3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

    4: No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

    5: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

    6: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

    7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

    8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

    Further there is no mention of the most important portion of sovereignty, the General Police Power. This is made explicit in the 1st through 8th and 10th Amendment:

    Article [I] (Amendment 1 – Freedom of expression and religion)
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Article [II] (Amendment 2 – Bearing Arms)
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Article [III] (Amendment 3 – Quartering Soldiers)
    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    Article [IV] (Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure)
    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Article [V] (Amendment 5 – Rights of Persons)
    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Article [VI] (Amendment 6 – Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions)
    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

    Article [VII] (Amendment 7 – Civil Trials)

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    Article [VIII] (Amendment 8 – Further Guarantees in Criminal Cases)
    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    Article [X] (Amendment 10 – Reserved Powers)
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    And the fact that even the States were not to possess an unlimited General Police Power is made clear by the specific limitations on the States found in Article 1, section 10 and Article IV:
    Section 10

    1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

    2: No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

    3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

    Article IV (Article 4 – States’ Relations)
    Section 1
    Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

    Section 2
    1: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

    2: A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

    3: No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

    Section 3
    1: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

    2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

    Section 4
    The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

    and the text of the 9th Amendment:
    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    The General Police Power is the power to regulate behavior in general and not with regard to some specific enumerated power. The Federal Government does not have this. The States do, subject only to limits found in their several constitutions, the Articles above, and under the doctrine of incorporation, the Bill of Rights.

    So far everything I have discussed has centered around the Article I powers and the limits thereon, since Article I, sets out only the Legislative power and form of Congress, why have I not discussed the Judicial or Executive branch in my discussion of the extent of Federal Authority? Quite simply because, all of the power to initiate action by Government is vested in the Legislative body. The Executive and Judicial branches are concerned with implementing and enforcing laws. The laws that are to guide their actions are meant to come from the Congress. I plan to discuss the other branches further in future pieces, but when talking about the enumeration of powers and limits on their exercise it is the legislative power that is the driver.

    So the bulk of Federal Authority is vested in Congress, and that authority is specifically limited by explicit prohibitions on actions, as well as being generally limited to the enumerated powers, but the structure of Congress is in itself another check on Federal authority. The framer’s biggest difficulty in balancing the need to preserve the States as sovereign entities with the need for a centralized authority to make us a Nation in more than name, was in determining how to select and shape the legislature. It was decided to create a bicameral legislature, each body having certain exclusive powers, but both bodies assent being needed to pass general legislation.

    This Congress was loosely modeled after the British Parliament, with the House of Representatives serving as the equivalent to the House of Commons, and the Senate an even looser equivalent to the House of Lords.

    The House was given the sole authority to initiate the exercise of the power to raise revenue, either by taxation or borrowing, and the power to initiate impeachments of officers of the other branches. The Senate was given the power of advising the Executive on treaties and appointments of officers, and the more significant power of consenting to such treaties and appointments, without which the treaty or appointment fails, and additionally the power of trying impeachments. The assignment of powers reflects the founders view of the House as being the People’s voice in the Government and the Senate being the States’ voice.
    The Great Compromise, sometimes called the Connecticut Compromise because Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth proposed and fought for it, is what finally brought the framers through the channel between Scylla and Charybdis. It provided that the States would each have two Senators, appointed by the State Legislature and serving a six year term. House terms were deliberately kept short at 2 years in order to try and keep the representatives easily subject to replacement if they acted in opposition to the will of the People.

    The general plan was that the House was to be the democratic body and the Senate the more aristocratic. The power of the purse was left to the people (subject to the specific prohibition of Article I section 9:4 which was meant to prevent exactly the sort of “loot the rich” tax schemes we are suffering today), because any money spent was coming from the people. The combination of a ban on direct taxes on any terms except equal payment from each person, with turning the budget over to the popularly elected House was meant to enforce fiscal responsibility. The XVIth amendment broke this system and gave the mob the power to vote themselves largess at the expense of various minority groups, and spending has steadily climbed ever since.

    The power of impeachment was also given to the House, but the power of trying impeached officers was given to the Senate. Splitting the power to remove officials between the democratic House and the aristocratic Senate was intended to simultaneously prevent the elites from protecting their own, and to prevent the passions of the mob from removing good officials for not catering to popular demands.
    The power of advice and consent was given to the Senate. This was a bit of a compromise intended to give the States, which were surrendering their power to enter treaties to the new Federal Government, input into, and veto power over foreign agreements. The XVIIth amendment broke this compromise and did a great deal of harm to our system in the name of democracy.

    Basically the framers set up a Government in shackles. It was capable of decisive action in moments where the various parts of the country were aligned and much more restrained when they were not. Much of our history since has been a series of loosenings of those shackles, for the most part to our detriment.

  • I AM A SAINT! (and everyone else, well…)

    NOT Jarflax, but rather Saint Isidore of Seville – the Patron Saint of the Internet

    A Jarflax Rant

    I have been surfing the web and it seems that there are a lot of stupid opinions and beliefs.  You have your (((Joos))), Christers, Buddha Botherers, Holy Cow Heroes, Mohammedans, and even those damn Mormons (no one could be that nice unless they were up to something).  You have your Pinkos, Reactionaries, Progs, and those evil Glibertarians.  And all of you bastards are stubbornly refusing to recognize obvious reality!  Is it that you are all evil conspirators trying to take my stuff and make me a slave? That you like to see orphans selling themselves for a crust of bread?  Or is it that you are all retarded and can’t see what is as plain as the nose on your collective face?  Why can’t all the other 7.5 billion of you see TRUTH as clearly as me?

    Every problem has a neat solution.  Every situation is made difficult by easily identifiable malice, and could be perfectly smooth, just, and simple if the evil obstructionists would stop deliberately disrupting things.  If you want wisdom buy me a fair trade latte or a PBR and sit with me as I sneer it out, one snarky epigram at a time.  Just don’t be one of those assholes who doesn’t understand conversational etiquette!    I talk/you listen, capisce?  Do not ask me to enact your labor!  Google it yourself!  I am emitting wisdom, not being your research assistant!

    Also if you voted for the Cheetoman, the Gangster in the Mao suit, some election spoiling third party wasted vote candidate, or were too lazy to vote at all you are an asshole and one of the evil obstructionists, so don’t think your imperialist earholes get to drink my sweet wisdom.

    If you believe in Jesus you want to watch womyn bleed out in back alleys while piles of beaten gay corpses fill the gutters.  If you do not believe in God you want pedophiles to sodomize toddlers, at clinics where mandatory abortions are performed by perverts that are married to camels!  If you are Muslim you are either planning a bombing or are reading this as you leave the scene.  If you are a (((Jew))) it is all your fault. If you are some other weird religion, you are lying!

    If you like country, western or metal you are a Nazi racist.  If you like pop you are a pervert. If you like classical you are a pretentious closet pedo.  If you like hip hop you are a rapist. If you like something else you are lying!

    If you are male you are a rapist and probably a murderer.  If you are female you are an emotion driven castrating whore.  If you are neither you are probably both.

    In short everyone who disagrees with me is doing so because they are evil!

     

    *****************************************************************************

    People have a very hard time distinguishing disagreement from malice, particularly in areas of belief. Religion and Politics are essentially similar belief based conceptions of reality.  They inspire strong emotions, and inculcate an Us vs. Them mentality, leading to anger… Which is why they were traditionally excluded as conversation topics from polite gatherings.

    Some of this is unavoidable, and will always be the case.  People get very emotionally connected to core beliefs and any attack on those beliefs, or even strong disagreement, hits us in the same way a personal attack hits.  But I think some aspects of modern life have made this worse.

    The internet and social media expose us to the worst spokespeople for ideas.  In earlier times when you were interested in a subject, or a viewpoint you sought out books or articles explaining it.  You might agree with what you read or disagree.  You might find parts of the idea appealing and others appalling, but it was an impersonal interaction, and under your control.  You read the book or article and any dispute you had with it was internal.  If it was too offensive, or too idiotic you just put the book down unfinished.  If it didn’t interest you, simply never read about it.  Various curating bodies/effects tended to select for the best, most appealing spokes people being the most widely read.

    Even then you had people who would try to force you to learn about their pet beliefs.  We called those people cranks or bores, and we never invited them to a second party.  Now every ‘movement’ or belief has militant advocates.  They bring their pet belief into EVERY conversation, and because they are ubiquitous they are usually the first contact you have with an unfamiliar belief.

    Vegetarianism is an utterly inoffensive practice.  How can your diet possibly harm or insult me?  But I cringe when I hear that someone is Vegan, because I have had dozens of interactions with people who militantly proselytize the Vegan ‘lifestyle’, not as a diet they have chosen but as “The One Truly Moral Way to Live.”

    Across the dietary divide you find the Paleos.  They think veganism is foolish, possibly an evil conspiracy of Big Grain and that we can only achieve health (and cure every ill of body mind and soul) by eating a largely carnivorous, low carb, high fat/protein, ancestral diet. If you disagree (which you can do simply by not immediately and unequivocally accepting every bit of pseudo science they spout as TRVTH), they will harangue you until you leave the forum.

    As you turn away from the Paleo, who is beating the Vegan to death with a jar of ghee, Mr. Crossfit hobbles over on his crutches (blown tendon bro, do you even lift?) to tell you what a pussy you are for not exercising to the point of regurgitation.  Fleeing Mr. Crossfit you encounter Ms. Antivax, who explains that the $30 DPT shot is a plot by Big Pharma to make your kids autistic, and announces that if you vaccinate you are in a parenting category with Jeffrey Epstein.

    You don’t learn about Christianity from C.S. Lewis or G.K Chesterton; instead you learn about it from Frank Fundy who mocks you for being duped by the lies of the ‘Evolutionists’, and accuses you of molesting children if you meekly say you do not see why gay people shouldn’t be allowed to adopt.

    Turning away from Mr. Fundy you run into a flame war between Moishe who regards any disapproval, of any Jew, in any context, as clear evidence of NSDP membership, and Ackbar who screams that allowing Moishe to live is an unforgiveable offense against the religion of peace.  Meanwhile some 4chan’er is pretending to actually be a Nazi purely to rile up some SJW who dropped by the forum to berate all cis-hetero males for their inherent privilege. And an atheist is making very sure that you understand that he doesn’t believe in God, by announcing that only retards need a “Sky Daddy.”

    All of this is probably happening in a thread discussing your favorite hobby!  You don’t seek it out, it comes to you everywhere.  Reading about home brewing?  BOOM Atheism! Playing a Video Game?  WHAM Social Justice.  Looking up a recipe? POW Jesus/Allah/Jehovah loves/hates/owns you.  If you try to disengage gently the militants get offended.  If you dispute their premises they go ad hominem and call in sock puppets/allies/tulpae to pursue you across a dozen domains.

    Of course people end up feeling that anyone who disagrees with them is their enemy when every dispute becomes a personal attack.  Which of course makes the next set of people react with hostility when you disagree with them. So, this whole mess propagates itself.

    At the end of the day most people are not militants.  This is why in day to day life you find that you have friends and acquaintances who don’t actually believe the same things you do, but who are nonetheless decent people you enjoy knowing.  But online the trolls and the true believers come into their own, and God (or not, I don’t really care what you believe) help us all.