Wednesday Morning Links

 

Good morning my Glibs and Gliberinas!  And what a glorious morning it is for everyone except those living in Yuma.  Not due to the state of emergency they had to declare over illegals, it is just an overall shithole.

 

UVa students asks Beto why he gives so little in charity.

 

Lots o’ pouncing.

 

Man posing as a deliveryman tries to assassinate a woman with a crossbow he hid behind a giant box.

 

Alan Dershowitz happy for the opportunity to prove his innocence against woman accusing him of sexual abuse via a defamation lawsuit that she filed.

 

Ohio Man.

 

Bikini models being chased by Kangaroo.

 

That’s all i got for today.  I’ll leave you with a song and move along with my day.

Comments

445 responses to “Wednesday Morning Links”

  1. Slammer

    Good Morning, Banjos!!!

    1. Banjos

      Mornin’

  2. Pat

    Man posing as a deliveryman tries to assassinate a woman with a crossbow he hid behind a giant box.

    It’s time to ban crossbows, large cardboard boxes, and home delivery.

    1. Slammer

      And men?

    2. AlexinCT

      At least you didn’t demand they also ban men….

      1. Atanarjuat

        Hallelujah?

      2. Tonio

        You know who else used crossbows?

        1. The Rebellious Boxers?

          1. Tonio

            Band name.

        2. Spartacus

          You know who else used men?

          1. AlexinCT

            Other men?

    3. bacon-magic

      Worked for me. – Tyrion

    4. No one needs a high-capacity assault crossbow. It’s time to get these dangerous weapons of war off of our streets.

      1. Funnily enough, High capacity crossbows are less accurate and have shorter range than single shot crossbows.

    5. “the woman spent several months in the hospital”

      So it’s been months and they haven’t found the guy even though his face is on camera? Do you not have 4chan in Canada?

  3. AlexinCT

    UVa students asks Beto why he gives so little in charity.

    Same reason most other team blue people do: they want to “do good” (in quotes because what they really are after is their own power) with other people’s money. Not their own ever.

    1. PieInTheSky

      No, it is just that individual charity is pointless and does not help, you need organized redistribution by government or else it is in vain

      1. AlexinCT

        Especially when the goal is to generate a dependent voter base – with the same rights & functions as serfs or slaves used to have, but which nobody should ever tell that is what they have become – and to punish the entities you don’t like and lavish rewards on the ones you do (as long as they then turn around and put a large chunk of that cash in your campaign coffers or bank).

      2. Fourscore

        It ain’t charity if you boast about it.

        1. pistoffnick

          It aint charity if your forced to do it.

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      As Grandpa Gulag responded, ‘I give what I give’. All he needed to add was ‘fuck you’.

      For them, the calculus of what constitutes ‘compassion’ runs through the state thus freeing them of any responsibility.

      Stripped agency.

      Must be a miserable way to exist if you ask me.

    3. ChipsnSalsa

      I’ve always had the thought that people who believe in government solving the problems of the nation / world see their taxes as their contribution to the betterment of society.

      1. Yep. The true believers really mean it when they say that citizens have a responsibility to contribute their “fair share” in taxes and that it should go to things like education and health care for everyone, parks, bike lanes, whatever. Basically, everybody pools their money and the government is in charge of spending it to provide everyone with their basic needs plus those things which are considered beneficial to society, like libraries, playgrounds, public transportation, etc. So paying taxes is a moral duty; it’s not heroic, like saving a kitten from a burning building, more like a combination of civic responsibility and personal charity. Like mowing your own lawn and then getting the strip by the sidewalk for the old lady who lives next door.

        1. But wouldn’t it say more about a society if its citizens were not *forced* to do these things? If certain ideas were truly communally beneficial, wouldn’t people willingly contribute to achieve them?

          Shouldn’t a liberal be concerned about the legitimacy of their philosophies if citizens must be coerced into enacting them? Is their system really rooted in beneficence, as they believe, if it depends on violence?

          /rehtorical… things I ask progs when they present your arguments.

          1. Of course, but the argument is usually something like government has the expertise and authority to organize “charity” in the most effective and efficient ways and is going to be free of any type of bias in the distribution of benefits. Fair, in other words. Funny how “fairness” comes up so often when they really mean “equal”, which isn’t remotely the same thing.

          2. Rhywun

            It shows you what their opinion of others is. They NEED to be coerced because they are fallen from grace.

    4. Pope Jimbo

      Speaking of compassion….

      Minnesoda nonprofit wages finally keep up with govt wages.

      Nonprofit employee wages are on pace with government wages in Minnesota for the first time — indicating that a sector long staffed by people expected to live on little pay while doing good has grown increasingly competitive with other industries.

      “Over the last 10 years, there’s been major progress,” said Jon Pratt, executive director of the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits. “There’s no economic reason it should be less [than government wages].”

      A real journalist would filter that data to exclude the low level semi-volunteers from the numbers so that we could see how lucrative it is to be an executive of a non-profit.

      *EDIT FAIRY HALP YA!*

      1. Pope Jimbo

        Is there a nonprofit out there to help spazzes who can’t close anchor tags?

        1. Pope Jimbo

          nonprofit edit faeries are the bomb!!!

      2. “Non-profits” should not have a separate tax status from for-profits if they pay anyone who works for them. You’re either a volunteer organization or you’re a company.

        But then I wonder how you could deal with the “administrative services company” that immediately crops up and is hired by the nonprofit to do “back office functions”

      3. Gadfly

        Nonprofit employee wages are on pace with government wages in Minnesota for the first time — indicating that a sector long staffed by people expected to live on little pay while doing good has grown increasingly competitive with other industries.

        In other words, the employees believe in for-profit work.

        1. There are a bunch of nonprofits in the sector in which I work, and while most of them really do pay their employees a pittance–which, to be totally fair, is expected within these particular circles–there are a few that are obviously gaming the shit out of the system. The expectation is mostly that when you work for one of these groups you’re doing it because you believe in the mission and any salary is basically just enough to keep you in a position where you can keep doing the work. But there’s one that pays its management a pretty fair bit of change and does stuff like buy islands for “educational” use and then host parties on them.

    5. Well he was dumb to release his returns.

  4. PieInTheSky

    Bikini models being chased by Kangaroo. – I thought Australian models were used to the local fauna

    1. AlexinCT

      Australia’s fauna and flora are all about killing everything.

    2. Sometimes the right answer is to run away.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        +1 Holy Hand Grenade

        1. +1 Sir Robin

      2. Tonio

        I was just thinking of the entirely gratuitous scene in Meaning of Life where someone is executed by being chased off a cliff by buxom, topless women.

        1. Gratuitous?! That is high art, friendo!

          1. AlexinCT

            I am not your friend, pal.

          2. bacon-magic

            He’s not your pal, buddy.

          3. BakedPenguin

            I’m not your buddy, guy.

          4. I’m not your junior, wells.

    3. Pat

      Defying stereotypes, the blonde is the only one who jumps in the pool while the ‘roo gives chase to the rest of the pack. It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad world.

    4. You ever box a ‘roo, mate? Rip yer arm off if ya don’t shoot it for the barbi.

    5. Tonio

      So the ‘Roo wasn’t the only thing bouncing, amirite?

      In B4 Q, biotches!

      1. AlexinCT

        You won the internets today Tonio!

    6. PieInTheSky

      Looking at the instagram that guy seems to be a less famous Dan Blizerian

      1. Atanarjuat

        I’m a less famous that-guy.

    7. Slammer

      Those pool thrones are pretty cool. Kind of Zardoz-looking

      1. ZARDOZ

        ZARDOZ SPEAKS TO YOU, HIS CHOSEN FURNITURE ADMIRING ONE. CORRECT! ZARDOZ IS PLEASED. ZARDOZ HAS SPOKEN.

  5. Ohio Man.

    At least the Iguana was okay. Those are more Floridian animals than Ohioan.

    1. Spartacus

      Its dorsal spikes are oddly bent, they ought to be pretty much vertical. A lot of times that comes from not being able to shed the skin covering them. They’ll shed all their skin except for on the spikes, and layers of the old skin can build up and cause them to be stunted or bent. When we had our iguana, we occasionally had to rub some baby oil onto the spikes to loosen up the old skin and get it off.

      1. Wait, you meant it literally when you said you were “Oiling your Iguana”?

        1. Spartacus

          Maybe.

  6. PieInTheSky

    Anne Hathaway Reveals She’s Not An Alcoholic, Just A Heavy Drinker

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/16/anne-hathaway-reveals-shes-not-an-alcoholic-just-a-heavy-drinker/

    1. Tonio

      Alcoholics go to meetings…

      1. LJW

        Buncha quitters…

      2. Fourscore

        “Alcoholics go to meetings…”

        …and celebrate their success after wards

        1. There was no success after Wards. Montgomery Wards went bankrupt.

    2. So am I! It’s a start that we have at least one thing in common.

    3. Drake

      I’d buy her a drink or two.

    4. DrOtto

      5 day hangover – I call bullshit. Also, would.

      1. BakedPenguin

        Yeah, you’d be dead if you drank enough to get a 5 day hangover. I’ve had two day hangovers, and was prolly a few ounces from Bon Scotting when I did.

        1. Look, jush because er han-hangover treatment ish vodka neat doeshent mean she didn’t have a handgover for five days.

  7. Tonio

    “[except] those living in Yuma”

    I’m enjoying the conspicuous silence from some ultra liberal people I know who moved there. If I had a nickel for every one of their “orange man bad, races” posts I could buy something fun.

  8. AlexinCT

    OT: Since a pimp’s love is different than that of a square, I want a pimp to comment on these instructions provided by an asshat on how to beat your wife according to islamic rules. Then again, everyone knows that pimps MUST discipline damned MAGA hat wearing immigrant fools. For their own good, of course….

    1. Slammer

      “See how merciful our God is? He doesn’t let me punch her face repeatedly”

      Kek

    2. Drake

      More reasons why people are converting to Islam.

    3. Rebel Scum

      His hateful display of Nazi speech merely required a more visceral response. ///CBS

  9. Fourscore

    “disorderly conduct complaint at 11:49 a.m”

    Bars open early so Ohio folks can get an early jump on the day. Ironic that the iguana named Copper had the cops called to his outing. Is it an Ohio thing to carry your iguana under your shirt? Inquiring minds and all

    1. AlexinCT

      My “lizard” or “iguana tail”, if you know what I mean, tends to be in my pants….

      The thing isn’t called a trouser lizard by accident.

      1. Now we know what happened to Mr Lizard!

        1. AlexinCT

          I can neither deny or confirm that it is in my pants….

    2. ElspethFlashman

      There’s a few “post – hours” bars in our area. They can stay open later than other bars, or open earlier. Some are open at 7am. So the third shifters can leave work, drive to the bar and get a drink on, then go home just like the 9-5ers.

      1. Spartacus

        There used to be a bunch of those in Cocoa Beach, back during the Apollo program when kennedy space center had third shifts. I remember the ABC Lounge in cape canaveral used to have a 7 am happy hour.

    3. Gadfly

      Ironic that the iguana named Copper had the cops called to his outing.

      Unfortunately for irony’s sake, it was the cops themselves who named the iguana “Copper”. I’m assuming because the humane society people they gave it to asked what it’s name was, because why else would you take it upon yourself to name an animal that was just going to be in your custody for a short time?

  10. Drake

    Was his iguana overcooked?

  11. LJW

    Pete Buttigieg’s message to France sends social media into a tizzy

    OMG he speaks a second language! That totally makes him qualified to be the next president. Why bother having an election?

    1. Old Man With Candy

      “Oh wait, Bush spoke fluent Spanish. Never mind.”

      How many languages does that Trump woman speak?

      1. AlexinCT

        She speaks 4.

        1. Rebel Scum

          So you’re saying Melania is bae.

        2. ‘Cause she’s just dumb arm candy, of course.

          1. AlexinCT

            She doesn’t believe the crap marxists peddle (in fact she hates marxism and escaped a country that was under that yoke ), so she HAS to be dumb..

    2. Tonio

      Yeah, the cult of personality is strong in that one. And the progs are going to be sooo disappointed if he doesn’t get the nomination. But they might let him play second fiddle to Kamala.

      1. Slammer

        Buttigieg is Chicken Soup for my Soul.

        Tucker’s face is priceless

        1. Atanarjuat

          Pelosi’s face, on the other hand, is a war crime.

          1. AlexinCT

            Wrap that up in a flag and do it out of patriotism?

    3. Pat

      The 37-year-old Indiana mayor — a graduate of Harvard and Oxford universities, Rhodes Scholar, Afghanistan veteran and musician

      Bobby Jindal was accepted to Harvard and Yale, and graduated from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. I’m sure he’d be accorded the same reverence for it.

      1. Fourscore

        And BJ probably spoke “Indian”. His initials didn’t help him with his campaign slogans though.

    4. ChipsnSalsa

      Oh, so he is more like Canada’s PM (name escapes me) that’s not a good prospect for him.

      1. BakedPenguin

        Garry Trudeau. Or whatever.

      2. But Enough About Me

        Justin Trudeau. Or you can just call him “shithead” like we do.

    5. Endless Mike

      It’s important to have the French on our side; if a war breaks out and the French aren’t our allies, who will we have to rescue?

    6. Suthenboy

      They are creating another goddamned creepy-ass cult of personality?

      Say it aint so.

  12. Should we give up eating red meat?

    Before you tuck into that lovely juicy steak, it’s worth thinking about the fatal effects it might have on you, from strokes and diabetes to cancer and heart disease

    diabetes? say what now?

    1. Correlation fallacy.

      Fat people tend to develop diabetes more.

      Fat people alos tend to eat more of, well, everything.

      Since they eat more red meat, you get this corelation spike between high levels of red meat consumption and diabetes due to a secondary factor (Obesity)

      1. The obesity also covers the strokes and heart disease. Not 100% on the effects of weight on cancer rates.

        1. Sensei

          USC – I meant to mention this to you in your PC build.

          I had a very high quality, but old specification PSU that bit me rather hard when I built my new PC with it. When the demand on the 12V rail dropped to near nothing (i.e. low usage) it would randomly freeze the PC.

          I found out the hard way that some of the low power CPU states don’t play nicely with older PSUs. It took me about 2 weeks to figure out and put in a modern PSU.

          https://techreport.com/review/24897/the-big-haswell-psu-compatibility-list

          1. I’ll keep that in mind.

            Replacing the power supply was scheduled for “when the video card gets upgraded” so long as there are no problems in the interim.

    2. AlexinCT

      At least they didn’t tell you that the icecaps would also melt and the oceans rise. Fuck these people are despicable.

    3. Should we give up eating red meat?

      No. Next question.

    4. Pat

      Replace protein and fat with white sugar and refined carbs, it’s the only known cure for diabetes.

    5. Drake

      Give up the rolls they bring you while the steak is cooking. (The hardest thing to do at the local place because they serve for-real farm butter with herbs mixed in)

    6. Rebel Scum

      Should we give up eating red meat?

      Hell no. Fuck off.

      *fires up grill*

  13. Rebel Scum

    “But I’ll tell you that I’m doing everything that I can right now, spending this time with you, not with our kiddos, not back home in El Paso, because I want to sacrifice everything to make sure that we meet this moment of truth with everything that we’ve got,” he concluded. “So if you have not read those tax returns, they’re online now for your scrutiny. Just know this: I will continue to try to be as transparent, and as forthcoming as I possibly can be.”

    He’s really channeling Justin Trudeau.

    1. AlexinCT

      Remember how “transparent” the last political group from that team turned out to be after promising they would set new records of transparency? Yeah…

      1. Gustave Lytton

        “Follow me around. I don’t care. I’m serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They’ll be very bored.”

        1. AlexinCT

          Considering some of the crap we are finding out went down, I wonder how this guy said this shit with a straight face….

  14. Pat

    Trashy,

    I came back too late to reply yesterday to the conversation regarding traditions and antiquities, and I don’t want to belabor the point, but I thought it was actually an interesting topic and enjoyed hearing what you had to say so I wanted to respond briefly.

    1) I never meant to suggest that tradition itself should be discarded, only that the material tokens thereof don’t necessarily deserve reverence – objects are objects, IMO. Ideas are of a whole other character. That said, I don’t really lament losing traditions rooted in nonsense either. There was ancient wisdom along with ancient foolishness.

    2) While I agree with your point and the substance of the Chesterton quote, I still don’t think they can fully address the incongruity between a reverence for tradition and reverence for an age whose entire raison d’être was the discarding of tradition. Culminating naturally as it did with the Reign of Terror in France, I’d contend the Enlightenment is the prototypical example of having too hastily discarded tradition for progress. 300 years after the fact, our received traditions now are precisely those of the Enlightenment, and taking a precautionary principle approach to them is, at the very least, drenched in irony.

    1. Culminating naturally as it did with the Reign of Terror in France, I’d contend the Enlightenment is the prototypical example of having too hastily discarded tradition for progress.

      That’s a good point as to why I shouldn’t hang my banner fully on the Enlightenment. Every movement has its excesses, and the enlightenment was only good insofar as it addressed and remedied the excesses of the past.

      For example, I’m not a pure individualist. I believe that families and (voluntary) communities have some rights in a societal context, too. To me, the individualism of the enlightenment was an overreaction.

      I also agree that objects are objects, but as you mentioned yesterday, there’s a part of everybody that feels a twinge when a beautiful old building goes away. Is that twinge just irrational egoism wrapped up in nostalgia, or is there something more to it? I lean towards the latter.

      Finally, before I make this an essay:

      That said, I don’t really lament losing traditions rooted in nonsense either.

      I think this was the whole point of the Chesterton quote. It’s very easy for one person, or even an entire society to label something as nonsense. Heck, we often fall into the trap of thinking that we’re the first enlightened generation and everybody before us were ignorant primitives. Chesterton encountered that belief acutely. The budding “planning” movement in the late 19th century threw out everything traditional as nonsense, and started from square one. Of course, all of the horrors of the first half of the 20th century sprung from that movement, as predicted by the traditionalists like Chesterton.

      1. Pat

        If you were to catch me in a particularly contrarian or argumentative mood, I’d defend the contention that the Enlightenment contained within it the philosophical seeds of Marx that sparked off the 20th century’s atrocities, and in that respect probably made humanity worse off than it would have been otherwise. So in that sense I’m pretty traditionalist. I do respect received wisdom. But not enough that I’m content to accept received error along with it rather than risk the consequences of change. So in that sense I’m less traditionalist. As a practical matter, I think modernity is shit and adapting to the pace of change since the loss of religion and family as primary institutions of social organization isn’t going all that well.

  15. You Don’t Know Marx: Part II

    Last time, I ended the article with a question: Why did American politicians during the Cold War raise perfectly valid objections to totalitarianism, which is a political system, while claiming that they were criticizing communism, which is an economic system? To understand this trend, you must first understand libertarianism, which is an ideology that endorses democratic government and laissez-faire capitalism using the philosophy of John Stuart Mill, Ayn Rand and Robert Nozick.

    The answer comes from the philosophical part of libertarianism. Mill said that the function of government is to prevent harm from happening to unconsenting citizens, which he called the harm principle. The classic example is that someone is allowed to drink alcohol to their heart’s content, but as soon as they start driving on a public road, that is the moment that the government has the right to intervene. It is important to note that the harm principle only addresses when the government can act; it says nothing about if the government should act.

    Imagine an island where no one owns a gun. The probability that someone on that island is shot is zero. Now, someone moves to the island and brings a gun with them. Now the probability that someone could be shot is greater than zero. This thought experiment proves that gun ownership inherently causes harm. In philosophy, an increase in the probability that someone will be harmed is considered itself a harm. Therefore, governments have the right to enact gun control laws. However, the question of how governments should exercise this right, if they choose to do so at all, is unanswered.

    well he’s got us there! much more derp inside the fold.

    1. AlexinCT

      With the people selling this evil shit it is always a shell game. Why can’t they just fucking admit that they are lazy and inept, but envy of the success of others and the fact said success pays off, motivates them to fuck over all others?

    2. oops… should have been some … marks after the first paragraph indicating I’m parsing through the article. It’s a long bit of tripe.

    3. ElspethFlashman

      I somehow see a large gap in logic – in the jump from “probability that someone will be harmed…” to “therefore, governments have the right to enact gun control laws. . . ” You see, the gov’t only has that right if _we_ give it to them.

      1. AlexinCT

        HERETIC!

        Don’t you know government is the new god? The all powerful and only benevelont entity that fights against the evuls perpetrated by the satanic private sector?

      2. Right. One could more simply conclude that as soon as one person on the island has a gun, everyone else has the right to own one to defend his/her self. Why add the complication of a third party, of a government?

        1. AlexinCT

          Because with these fucks it is always about government picking the winners & losers. Control. Nothing but.

    4. Pat

      As soon as I seen UMass plus the headline all I could think of was this. I guess some things never change.

    5. Old Man With Candy

      Imagine an island where no one has a penis. The probability that someone on that island is raped is zero. Now, someone moves to the island and brings a penis with them. Now the probability that someone could be raped is greater than zero. This thought experiment proves that penises inherently cause harm. In philosophy, an increase in the probability that someone will be harmed is considered itself a harm. Therefore, governments have the right to enact castration laws. However, the question of how governments should exercise this right, if they choose to do so at all, is unanswered.

      1. Pat

        I believe Zardoz has a plan…

        1. ZARDOZ

          ZARDOZ SPEAKS TO YOU, HIS CHOSEN PLAN OBSERVING ONE. YES, ZARDOZ HAS GIVEN THE GIFT OF THE GUN TO THE BRUTAL EXTERMINATORS AND INSTRUCTED THEM TO GO FORTH AND KILL. THIS MAY TAKE SOME TIME TO FINISH. ZARDOZ HAS SPOKEN.

    6. Rufus the Monocled

      “I really like the approach of John Rawls, a philosopher who made a career analyzing justice and fairness. He said that all social systems should be set up to be fair, where social systems refer to the economics, law, family structure, culture, artistic expression, etc.”

      Naturally he would like Rawls.

      When I read some Rawls back in college, he creeped me out.

      1. Rebel Scum

        I am not familiar with him, but I’d guess his idea of “fair” is not the same as my idea of fair.

        1. My idea of fair is I keep what I earn, you keep what you earn, and we hang thieves.

          1. AlexinCT

            How do I get to virtue signal how marxistly woke I am in a system like that, huh?

            /progtard

    7. Slammer

      Imagine an island where no one owns a gun. The probability that someone on that island is shot is zero. Now, someone moves to the island and brings a gun with them. Now the probability that someone could be shot is greater than zero. This thought experiment proves that gun ownership inherently causes harm.

      Imagine an island where there are no women. The probability for prostitution (with a woman) is zero. Now move a woman onto the island. The probability for prostitution is now greater than zero. This thought experiment proves women inherently cause harm.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        Imagine an island where there are no transgender. The probability of someone being cut is zero. Now move a knife onto the island. The probability for cuts is now greater than zero. This thought experiment proves knives inherently cause harm. Government must intervene with common sense transgender control.

        Imagine an island where there are no knives. The probability for cuts is zero. Now move a knife (say by ACME Imports who had connections with local officials) onto the island. The probability for cuts is now greater than zero. This thought experiment proves knives inherently cause harm. So find another way to cut that cantaloupe.

    8. Subwoofer

      Imagine an island where no one owns a gun. The probability that someone on that island is shot is zero. Now, someone moves to the island and brings a gun with them. Now the probability that someone could be shot is greater than zero. This thought experiment proves that gun ownership inherently causes harm.

      Keep moving those goal posts. Getting shot is not same as being harmed. Yes, it harms you to get shot, but getting shot isn’t the only way you can be harmed. In absence of firearms on fantasy island, he with the strongest biceps reigns. You’d think no murders or violence ever occurred in human history prior to inventing firearms if you listen to these people.

      1. Subwoofer

        Also, lack of guns = patriarchal oppression. How can the womyn hope to stave off über-rapists without a force equalizer?

    9. Rebel Scum

      governments have the right

      No, they don’t. Governments have power and authority. The US government and those of the several states are granted certain authorities. Incidentally they are expressly prohibited from arms regulation, thought they do it anyway because they have the power to. Either way, your thought experiment has a flawed premise.

    10. Fatty Bolger

      I guess this guy has never heard of the dictatorship of the proletariat? Marxist communism is a totalitarian system, both in theory and practice. It’s also FAR more than just an “economic system.” It’s a socioeconomic system that covers almost every aspect of life.

    11. Gadfly

      Why did American politicians during the Cold War raise perfectly valid objections to totalitarianism, which is a political system, while claiming that they were criticizing communism, which is an economic system?

      Perhaps because communism is an economic system that requires totalitarianism to function. You cannot take from each according to his ability without total control. Small scale voluntary communism (like on a commune) is the only communism that even can be voluntary, trying to scale it up to a wider system necessarily requires forcing people to submit against their will. People who want the whole economy to operate on communist principles are totalitarians.

  16. Rebel Scum

    Manhunt underway for fake deliveryman who shot woman with crossbow

    This wouldn’t happen if we had commonsense cross-bow control.

    1. Tonio

      Well, he did deliver *something.*

      1. Grummun
    2. BakedPenguin

      Who are you, Pope Innocent II?

  17. Tonio

    So, I’ve noticed that a lot of people (not here) are complaining about the money being donated for cathedral restoration when there are homeless in US and France, poor rural churches in Louisiana that still haven’t been rebuilt after latest hurricane, and of course the water in Flint, Michigan. “See, rich white men could solve the world’s problems if they wanted to.”

    Fair enough up to a point, but the naïve do-gooders are, as always, being led by the grifters.

    1. AlexinCT

      I WANT TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD DO WITH YOUR MONEY!

      /progtard

    2. Pat

      I mean, considering how much wealth is owned by the Catholic church I’d think they could pretty well afford to fix their own cathedral, but who am I to tell anybody what to do with their money?

      1. AlexinCT

        I don’t think they guys in Rome are friendly with the ones in Paris.

        1. Raphael

          I don’t think the guys in Rome are friendly with anyone else in the Church. *sighs and drinks in tired catholic*

      2. Tonio

        Apparently the cathedral is actually owned by the government of France. And given the fungibility of money, these people are in effect making a big donation to the government of France.

        But, yes, that’s an excellent point about the Church as a whole. Particularly the Vatican. We will never know how much they have in Swiss (sorry) bank accounts.

        1. Pat

          That figures. I’d still think it appropriate for the church to kick down for at least a big part of the restoration, given the iconic status of the building and the mountain of cash at their disposal. Considering the state of modern France though, It’s probably more appropriate that it be rebuilt by secular money.

        2. invisible finger

          ” We will never know how much they have.”

          It’s also none of our business.

          1. A Leap at the Wheel

            It was absolutely my business when I was a parishioner.

        3. AlexinCT

          Was the cathedral not insured? I am sure private entities are forced by frog law to have insurance, so why not property owned by the state, huh?

          1. robc

            They self-insure their properties. In other words, no.

          2. Tonio

            Most governments are self-insuring, particularly the sovereign ones. And had it been insured, there would have been a fire suppression system of some sort.

          3. AlexinCT

            So one rule for the plebes and non for them, again?

          4. Tonio

            Meh. Think it through, Alex. Would you as an insurer insure a sovereign entity that controlled the laws and courts, ie one that could decide that your denial of that entity’s claim was illegal.

          5. AlexinCT

            I WILL PASS A LAW TO FORCE YOU TO ACCEPT IT!

            /nanny state

    3. Drake

      Put the homeless to work moving stones. And the orphans.

    4. Brawndo

      It’s almost like people are still acting in their own interest even when they’re being charitable.

      1. AlexinCT

        Why would you give any form of charity to something you didn’t believe in? Even the political class knows this…

    5. invisible finger

      So what they’re saying is rich white men should be in charge of everything.

    6. Gadfly

      …when there are homeless in US and France, poor rural churches in Louisiana that still haven’t been rebuilt after latest hurricane, and of course the water in Flint, Michigan…

      The only part of this complaint that really has merit would be the rural churches (assuming they’re Catholic, since I’m assuming the Notre Dame donors have an affinity for Catholicism). There will always be homeless, no matter what you do, so it’s silly to say you shouldn’t donate to another cause before fixing an intractable problem. And the Flint fiasco was entirely self-inflicted, so they are in no way deserving of charity (if you want to help them out, that’s nice, but they don’t get to be on a list of “you should solve this first”). Ultimately people donate to what they care about, and no one can care about everything, so it is perfectly acceptable for people to donate to something they care about that other people might not.

  18. Rufus the Monocled

    Buttplug: So he can say ‘All Lives Matter’ in seven languages, eh?

    1. Pat

      It’s sad to see that happen to such an esteemed institution of higher learning…

      1. invisible finger

        Finally they stopped lying to parents about what their kids are studying.

    2. BakedPenguin

      “We’d like to go from mostly useless to entirely useless!”

    3. Not Adahn

      I had truly excellent sex in Tyrell Hall.

  19. Rufus the Monocled

    Blue Jackets and Islanders.

    Wow.

    Rare in hockey sweeps happen but twice? To top notch teams? By under dogs?

    1. invisible finger

      Tamps deserved to get swept. A month ago they were bitching about who they would have to play in the second round.

      1. robc

        Problem solved.

      2. Rufus the Monocled

        Totally deserved by CBJ. They hammered them and stole their hockey pucks.

        1. Tundra

          Agreed.

          Completely tenacious on the forecheck, owned the neutral zone and Bob was ready to roll. A great series (if you aren’t a Bolts fan)!

          1. BakedPenguin

            Go sniff a line of snow, you semi-Canadian.

          2. BakedPenguin

            Watch out where the huskies go, and don’t you snort that yellow snow…

          3. Chipwooder

            Do you have any idea what the street value of this mountain is??

  20. Pat

    Notre-Dame fire: International call for architects to design new spire

    France is to invite architects from around the world to submit their designs for a new spire to sit atop a renovated Notre-Dame cathedral.

    Prime Minister Edouard Philippe told reporters they hoped for “a new spire that is adapted to the techniques and the challenges of our era”.

    Slap a crescent on it and call it a day.

    1. Tonio

      [bitter golf clap]

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      Better yet, convert it to a Mosque.

      It’s not like the French have any self-dignity left as well as bother to go to Church anymore.

      1. Surrender is not an option.

        Even when talking about the French.

    3. RegicidalManiac

      For fuck’s sake. Just rebuild it, you opportunistic fucks.

      1. slumbrew

        Not enough opportunity for graft.

  21. Drake

    That “high-capacity” magazine ban in New Jersey working as expected.

    1. Sensei

      Until they start coming to our houses.

      Shame about the boating accidents…

      I will not look back when I leave NJ.

    2. Rebel Scum

      *Nelson laugh*

    3. Fourscore

      “–-(Ammoland.com)-There are an estimated one million-gun owners with standard capacity magazines (10+ rounds) in the State of New Jersey, bringing an estimated number of magazines holding more than ten rounds to around ten million”

      Am I missing something in this sentence?

  22. Rebel Scum

    A Kangaroo chased a group of terrified models around during a bikini-clad photo shoot this weekend.

    AUSSIE SMITH SAY RELAX.

    1. AlexinCT

      AND LET ME DO IT!

  23. Legal expert says erotic strangulation ‘on the edge of homicide’

    While retired United States Superior Court Judge Eugene Hyman has no connection to the case, he has spoken out about how such a dangerous act cannot be consented to, labelling strangulation as “foreplay for death”.

    The expert in domestic violence and non-fatal strangulation cases said the risk of femicide, or the intentional killing of a female because of her gender, increased by 600 to 700 per cent once a woman had been non-fatally strangled once.

    He described strangulation as being “on the edge of homicide”.

    “How can you consent to what is the equivalent of playing Russian roulette?” he said during a conference at Bond University on the Gold Coast.

    “When there’s an increase of 600 per cent (risk) when the person has been non-fatally strangled before, in my opinion the choking sex game thing … can’t be legal.

    1. AlexinCT

      David Carradine was not available for comment….

        1. Pope Jimbo

          What? Are you telling me that he’s still in the closet?

          1. AlexinCT

            That left a mark your holiness…

      1. KSuellington

        He was hanging out with Michael Hutchence.

    2. Pat

      Foreplay for Death would be a great band name.

    3. Subwoofer

      So does nobody who plays Russian Roulette consent to doing do? Everyone who plays was forced into it?

      And its not “the intentional killing of a female because of her gender” if she’s strangled during a sexual encounter as part of the sex itself. If a person was down with getting choked the first time, and many women do actually like that, its not deliberate murder of a female if she wants to do it again the next time and her partner miscalibrates.

    4. A Leap at the Wheel

      Thank you, retired United States Superior Court Judge Eugene Hyman, for breaking this issue wide open. Without a public debate, we will never have made in head way on this issue.

  24. Slammer

    NYC’s Museum of Natural History Expels Brazil Gala Honoring ‘Fascist’ Bolsonaro

    I found this gem on twitter:

    Paul Orselli

    @museum_exhibits
    Apr 15

    Thank you. Museums are not neutral.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Well, I won’t ever be setting foot in that museum.

      1. Chipwooder

        It’s a shame. We go there every time we’re in NY to visit my relatives. The kids love the dinosaur exhibits. Hope they file away the memories because I’ll never go there again.

        1. Rhywun

          Enh, they shouldn’t be holding what amounts to political events anyway.

          1. R C Dean

            And if that was their policy, fine. But its not.

          2. Rhywun

            It appears not, since they had one last year.

            Maybe this will make them reconsider their policies.

          3. R C Dean

            I’m sure they are quite happy with their policy of supporting leftists and opposing everyone else.

    2. Rebel Scum

      Bolsonaro, a conservative, has called for significantly reducing government spending on what he considers extraneous social programs

      Everyone knows that fascists are all about cutting spending, especially on social programs because fascists are notoriously against social regimentation.

      he also promised as a presidential candidate to complete several Amazonian infrastructure projects that would help guarantee more access to electricity for those regions, some of which still rely on Venezuela for their power.

      Probably a wise move.

  25. Someone looked like they were visiting the Golden Corral… several times a week:

    Why Andrea Dworkin is the radical, visionary feminist we need in our terrible times

    Dworkin, who died of heart failure in 2005 at the age of 58, was one of the world’s most notorious radical feminists. She wrote 14 books, the most famous of which was Pornography: Men Possessing Women (1981). Now her work is being revisited in Last Days at Hot Slit, a new collection of her writing.

    In the early 1970s, Dworkin spoke of her own experiences of sexual abuse and violence at a time when few did. And in today’s climate of #MeToo revelations, we can see how far ahead of her time she was. “In the 1980s and 1990s, reading Dworkin became, for many, a discomfiting and exhilarating collegiate rite of passage,” reads a recent piece in the New York Times. “Her writing is a strident and raw look at the systemic bias affecting the everyday experiences of women.”

    Dworkin’s 1983 book, Right-Wing Women, could have been about how Trump came to power. Although I doubt she would have been so quick to lay the bulk of the blame for Trump’s election on white women, her razor-sharp analysis of why so many women are attracted to a politics that despises their rights is more relevant today than ever. Her central theory is that the right exploits women’s fear and offers us a chivalrous protection. It reassures us that we do not need to change the status quo, but accept it, and take whatever access to power is available to us. Dworkin despaired at what has come to be known as “lean-in feminism” which focuses on the ability of individual, privileged women to climb to the top, and always said that until women at the “bottom of the pile” were liberated, none of us could be.

    1. Pat

      Her central theory is that the right exploits women’s fear and offers us a chivalrous protection.

      “Hey, marry the guy you fuck so you don’t have to raise your kid by yourself” is oppressive. “Hey, mortgage your soul to the welfare state so you can raise your kid by yourself” is empowerment.

      1. AlexinCT

        Unfortunately, logic has never been this demographic’s strong suit….

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      Feminism destroyed the essence and soul of women.

      It’s more about trying to measure up or be equal to men.

      It’s bound to be a downer for many women who buy into that misleading path.

      Just be you.

      Or you.

      And you.

      /tickles random woman’s tummy.

      1. Slammer

        “All Men are pigs”

        “Women are equal to Men”

      2. BakedPenguin

        It’s more about trying to measure up or be equal to men.

        4th wave feminism is a supremacy movement. Unless they’re utter idiots (and I’m not ruling that out for many of them), they know that equality of choice has already arrived, and inequalities of outcome are due to choices by individuals.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      It reassures us that we do not need to change the status quo, but accept it, and take whatever access to power is available to us.

      But enough about Hillary Clinton and her riding Bill’s coat tails.

    4. Not Adahn

      I remember when A.D. tried to start a rape hoax.

      Even her closest friends and defenders were like “….seriously? You expect us to believe that?”

  26. Rebel Scum

    Good. Let the hate flow through you.

    [Obama] joked to the evening’s host Stephen Colbert that — like choosing to live with a divorced dad — the choice to elect Trump may initially have seemed appealing but quickly turned sour.

    ‘We [America] come from a broken family, we are a little unsettled. Sometimes you spend the weekend with divorced dad. That feels like fun but then you get sick. That is what America is going through. We are living with divorced dad.’

    More like the fun, quirky uncle. But everyone knows divorced dads are deplorable.

    1. >> may initially have seemed appealing

      I wonder why that happened, Mr. Lightbringer. Real mystery there.

      1. AlexinCT

        I can’t wait for the lot of them to be wearing orange jump suits while the orange man laughs at them.

    2. Raphael

      I hated that joke so damn much. I love my dad and spending every Sunday with him and the grandparents were some of my best and brightest memories of childhood.

    3. straffinrun

      The bravery of taking shots at people who get fucked by the courts. So brave.

    4. Pat

      That’s a stellar source of comedy in a country with a 50% divorce rate.

      1. I keep hearing that statistic, and it always makes me ask “Is the rate so high because the same people keep getting divorced and remarried over and over again?” Or is the statistic just inaccurate?

        1. Pat

          IIRC, remarriages and the proliferation of unmarried cohabitation both have contributed to the stat, which is possibly only apocryphal anyway. Still, the divorce rate is high and blended families are common. Trashing divorced dads might not be an especially smart move. Particularly as a black man.

        2. According to these people the stats are bad. Most of the divorce rate is due to serial monogamists. They put the number for first marriages around 30%.

          Anecdotally, this is my wife’s second marriage and my first.

          1. A Leap at the Wheel

            Plus, couples that would have, in say 1910, gotten married then divorced are now more likely to never get married, which depresses the divorce rate in 2019 compared to 1919.

    5. Rufus the Monocled

      He’s such a fucken smart-alec dickhead.

      Colbert is pathetic.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        She’s.

    6. Gadfly

      So, what’s the over-under on how long until someone’s selling “Divorced Dad’s for Trump” paraphernalia?

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        *furiously fills out cafe press forms*

  27. AlexinCT

    I would never have guessed this shit would end wrong. Not even after looking at every other instance when this was done resulting in the same shit…

    1. AlexinCT

      HEPL EDIT FAIRY!

      1. robc

        HEPL

        I hope that was on purpose.

        1. AlexinCT

          Of course it was. It’s like lighting the bat signal.

    2. Michael

      The SWAT team, the overdose, the complaints of pot smoke in the air and feces in the stairwell…

      But enough about last month’s Glibs meet-up.

  28. Pope Jimbo

    You like me, you really like me!

    -Ilhan Omar

    The goof has raised $830K so far from her supporters. The only good news is that her fellow Dems may not want to take money from her because of her toxicity to sane voters.

    1. straffinrun

      Half a million alone came in an envelope with “Trump” stamped on the back.

    2. AlmightyJB

      She also has a quarter million dollar book deal, which I’m sure she’ll split with the poor.

      https://www.chicksonright.com/youngconservatives/2019/01/25/controversial-rep-ilhan-omar-signs-lucrative-book-deal/

      1. cyto

        For those who were alive in the 90’s, doesn’t a book deal mean you have to resign from congress? Or does it only work that way if you have an (R) next to your name?

  29. Nazis, Leftists are cousins
    The media, literature, cinema, arts, culture—everything is controlled by the state. Even science has to be subservient to the ruling ideology

    In his masterly The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer wrote, “It was [Gregor] Strasser’s radicalism, his belief in the ‘socialism’ of National Socialism, which attracted the young Goebbels [who later became Hitler’s trusted lieutenant]. Both wanted to build the party on the proletariat. The diary of Goebbels is full of expressions of sympathy for Communism at this time. ‘In the final analysis,’ he wrote on October 23, 1925, ‘it would be better for us to end our existence under Bolshevism than to endure slavery under capitalism’.”

    Notice the smooth, seamless movement of the Strasser and Goebbels between Nazism and socialism. We need to mention here that this was possible primarily because both ideologies have a great deal in common; and commonalities pertain to fundamentals, not just accidental features. Both are collectivist: the collectivity is supreme and its powers over the individual absolute.

    Since the collectivity is supreme, its concrete expression, the state, is all-powerful. It ought to be, otherwise, how would it exercise its supremacy? Consequently, there is little regard for democracy, less for civil liberties, and least for individual freedom. No ideology other than that of the ruling clique is even allowed to exist; elections, when they are, are a farce. Purges are frequent, concentration camps an integral part of the system.

    1. AlexinCT

      Old news if you didn’t get your history from tired old proggie marxists.

    2. Pat

      Commies to the left of me, Nazis to the right…

      1. BakedPenguin

        Here I am, stuck in the middle with (((yous)))

        1. Wait, you’re an extreme leftist with a totalitarian bent?

          1. BakedPenguin

            duh, I’m obviously alt-right by today’s standards.

  30. robc

    Mild Wednesday, this one is breaking all the rules, in fact, in looks like the kind of recipe that American homebrewers think a mild should look like. ABV of 3.04%, IBU of 22.Crystal and Black malt.

    It is exactly what most British brewers dont do. But this brewer did it in 1929.

    http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2019/04/lets-brew-russell-4d-ale.html

  31. Pope Jimbo

    Minnesota principals display courageous principles.

    Last December our new gov-elect was lauded for “snubbing” Trump.

    On Monday, our Gov went hat in hand for a 20 minute meeting to plead for disaster relief funds (for spring flooding).

    So, there he was, essentially in a private audience with Trump, who is in the midst of a feud with U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minneapolis. Was Walz tempted to give the president a piece of his mind?

    “Those of you who know me know I’m always tempted to say things,” Walz said Tuesday, chuckling. But the answer was no.

    “I also think it’s my responsibility … to bring decorum back to conversations. I don’t think that was the right setting, where my job was to advocate in the immediate interest of Minnesotans, some of whom were without power as the president and I were speaking. … You only get a little bit of time, so you need to be very thoughtful. The president proactively bringing it up to me is incredibly encouraging — that that’s what he wanted to talk about.”

    Give the man credit for knowing that Trump reads the papers and is vindictive enough that if he said anything too snide, the chances of getting that Fed money would be gone.

    1. robc

      Hand him a copy of the Davy Crockett speech and show him to the door.

      1. Gadfly

        That ship has sailed…well over a century ago.

    2. AlexinCT

      I am sure that once he has secured that loot he wants he will apologize publicly for being such a cunt, right?…

  32. OT: Yesterday I finally got to seal the slate floor.

    Here is a photo of the floor once the tile that overlayed the slate was removed
    https://i.imgur.com/DAu7yBK.jpg

    ::montage of scraping and swearing::

    And here it is “finished” with the semi-gloss sealer on
    https://i.imgur.com/oRnOMACl.jpg

    1. Damn imgur – here is the last link again: https://i.imgur.com/oRnOMAC.jpg

      1. straffinrun

        Looks great. Is that just inside your front door?

        1. Yeah entryway to the house – bi-level, so you can go down a flight of stairs to the living area/kitchen or upstairs to the bedrooms.

          This slate is found in most of the houses in the neighborhood – made by the same builder ala 1960 to 1962

          1. Pat

            This slate is found in most of the houses in the neighborhood – made by the same builder ala 1960 to 1962

            Everything made before 2014 is known by the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects.

          2. Everything made before 2014 is known by the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects.

            FIFY

          3. straffinrun

            Very cool. Looks like a genkan. You take off your shoes inside the house or just hope they don’t have dog poop on them?

          4. You don’t watch where you’re walking?

          5. straffinrun

            Or, you walk around staring at your feet all day? I got asses to check out.

          6. There are so many short people that I am looking down anyway to avoid collisions. Besides, the people who live around here are old and fat, you don’t want to look at their backsides.

          7. AlexinCT

            You need to move… One of life’s great pleasures is a pair of beautiful long legs going up and making an nice ass out of themselves, man…

          8. Tundra

            *moves to Japan*

          9. Lol, Alex you must walk around with a perpetual erection given how many of your daily cycles are devoted to sex.

          10. AlexinCT

            A man has to have a purpose and reason for live Trashie, and mine is that for sure..

        2. Sensei

          Time to confess you wanted to type “genkan”!

          1. straffinrun

            Heh. I just did.

      2. Tundra

        Perfect for the house! Well done!

      3. Fourscore

        You did that? Absolutely beautiful !

        /Hangs head in shame while avoiding looking at the basement floor/

        1. Well I removed the tile that was on top to expose the original floor and cleaned up the mastic. Just sweat, blood, n frustration. And listening to a lot of music while doing the work.

    2. R C Dean

      Sweet. I expect it was you swearing at the orphans while they scraped?

      1. ElspethFlashman

        Lord H did all the heavy work. I merely swept & mopped a few times.

  33. BakedPenguin

    ‘Man posing as a deliveryman tries to assassinate a woman with a crossbow he hid behind a giant box.’ – in Canada

    Gun control works!

  34. The Other Kevin

    LT_Fish, you mentioned in last night’s thread that your company is hiring. I’m interested. How do I find out more?

  35. Pat

    After 18 Years, It Is Past Time To Face The Truth About Afghanistan

    The amount of resources and attention Washington has allocated in pursuit of the unattainable—a fully democratic Afghanistan free of corruption and patrimony, governed by the rule of law rather than the rule of the gun—would be the stuff of comedies if it weren’t for the price tag attached to the effort: 2,242 U.S. troop fatalities, tens of thousands of additional injuries (many life-altering), and nearly $1 trillion in American treasure.

    U.S. officials owe the soldiers and diplomats in the field and the American people at home a realistic appraisal of what Washington can accomplish in a country that has been in the throes of armed conflict for four decades. If we hope to finally reach the day American troops can pack up their belongings and come back to their families, Washington must start viewing the war with clear eyes. Several hard truths about Afghanistan are in order.

    1. Subwoofer

      What possible reason can there be for US troops to still be there? We had a perfect window to save face and leave in a huge “mission accomplished” moment after offing bin Laden. But even the ostensibly anti-war left doesn’t seem to mind our ongoing excursion.

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Why do you hate America and our troops Subwoofer?
        Let’s face it, the public just doesn’t give a fuck.

        1. Subwoofer

          Right, I forgot that asking for a justification for deployments meant you hate the troops.

    2. Brett L

      Declare victory. Then leave.

      1. BakedPenguin

        Right? Even the Goddam Soviets were smart enough to leave after 10 years.

  36. The Late P Brooks

    Panic attack

    More than a dozen school districts in Colorado are closed Wednesday after the FBI and local law enforcement warned of an 18-year-old white woman who is “armed and dangerous” in the Denver metropolitan area.

    Sol Pais flew from Miami to Denver on Monday and “immediately” bought a pump action shotgun and ammunition, FBI Denver Special Agent In Charge Dean Phillips told reporters Tuesday evening.

    Pais had “made some concerning comments in the past” and had an “infatuation” with the 1999 Columbine High School shooting and its perpetrators, Phillips said at the press conference. She was last seen in the foothills of Jefferson County, in the metro Denver area.

    ————

    Phillips said law enforcement had no specific information about a threat to any one particular school, but they thought it was a “credible threat certainly to the community and potentially to schools.”

    ————-

    Pais had not been charged with a crime as of Tuesday evening, Phillips told reporters. Phillips said the FBI was working with federal prosecutors and local authorities were working with local prosecutors to bring charges against Pais.

    As of now, if Pais were found immediately, “we will certainly hold her for as long as we can legally,” Phillips said.

    At least they got that red flag law passed.

    I don’t even know what to think about stuff like this, other than to say I am highly suspicious of anybody who wants to “stop something before it happens” by denying rights to people who may or may not just be half a bubble off plumb.

    1. LJW

      I’m curious as to what credible evidence they have? Is hearsay considered credible?

      1. Subwoofer

        She probably posted something on Facebook, and after MSD they have to assume every Facebook post is credible?

    2. Subwoofer

      Love how they raided her home in Florida without any charges or warrants, shut down all the schools without any idea what she’s doing in Colorado, and intend to detain her as long as they can get away with doing so even though no crime has been committed.

      Similar MO to how they’ve treated Trump. (S)HE MUST BE GUILTY OF SOMETHING! Unleash all the power of the state on her until we find something!

      1. “(S)HE MUST BE GUILTY OF SOMETHING! Unleash all the power of the state on her until we find something!”

        This is pretty much the story of the human race.

        1. Subwoofer

          +3 felonies a day

      2. Plinker762

        Such a brave new progressive world.

    3. If they want to take precautions, that’s one thing. But if this, “federal prosecutors and local authorities were working with local prosecutors to bring charges against Pais” turns into some bullshit look-we-did-something photo/media op, that’s another thing entirely.

      1. So, to be absolutely clear, she has done nothing even remotely illegal, right? I mean, if I decided I wanted to go check Colorado out and do some clay shooting while I was out there, this could be me. Hell, or my wife, who watches and reads “true crime” stuff like Serial and Discovery ID constantly. God knows we’ve both said some shit online that someone in the FBI might find concerning, for a given value of concerning.

        1. Subwoofer

          Bingo

          1. I can easily see myself heading to visit the in-laws this summer in Texas, going on an Academy trip, and picking up a shotgun or like a Ruger 10/22 to fool around with down there. And apparently getting the whole damn state shut down while a manhunt is conducted.

            Also, this is suspicious as all hell. First, she looks 28 minimum, not 18. Second, there are no charges against her and she isn’t wanted for anything in particular, yet there’s a national manhunt for her. Third, there’s a nation-wide manhunt for a teenager who flew to Denver and bought a shotgun at what I’m guessing is like a Wal-Mart or a Bass Pro or something. They have pictures of her and they know enough about her to know that she bought a gun and ammo and they know enough about her to believe that she’s a threat to…something or someone, apparently, but they can’t find her in the Denver metro?

          2. B.P.

            Supposedly authorities believe she’s on the west side of the Denver metro area, in the foothills. She’s from Miami. She’ll freeze her ass off tonight.

            At least my kid got a day off from school.

        2. I’d think if there were charges to be brought, there’d be a warrant. Right now they’re just “looking” for her.

    4. Pope Jimbo

      With that much CYA going on, I wonder if someone slipped their FBI undercover agent leash and went rogue?

      “Doh! The crazy didn’t show up to the sting meeting where we were going to arrest her! This is going to be another Las Vegas shit show.”

    5. Sean

      You guys are missing the equality angle. It’s a crazy chick they’re after, not a crazy dude.

      GIRL POWER!

      1. Not Adahn

        Nah, it’s misogyny! If it were a crazy man, they wouldn’t have started the panic until he had actually done something. But let a woman get just a little bit cranky…

  37. Stinky Wizzleteats

    Trump vetoes the antiYemen war bill…

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/04/16/breaking-trump-vetoed-bill-to-pull-us-troops-from-yemen-n2544901

    Yep, he talks a good game but in the end he sucks like all the rest.

    1. Do we have troops in Yemen?

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Who the hell really knows (although I’d guess yes, at least a few)? I think the resolution was actually to end our support of the Saudis in their endeavor so the wording of the headline is incorrect. This one’s more accurate:

        https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/04/trump-vetoes-measure-involvement-yemen-war-190416234815258.html

        1. There’s a material difference between “Get our boots off the ground” and “stop aiding the Saudis” I’m disappointed in whoever wrote that headline.

          1. Stinky Wizzleteats

            The first one’s a conservative outlet and the thought of the bill dissing the troops would make Trump’s veto more palatable so I’d bet it was a conscious mistake.

      2. Fatty Bolger

        No. We have provided logistical support to the Saudis, though.

        1. Did we at least get paid for it? We shouldn’t give away our expertise and loan out our hardware for free. I mean, the Saudis have plenty of money and are adjacent to Yemen anyway. Send them an invoice.

        2. Stinky Wizzleteats

          We’re both kind of right: apparently we have a very limited number of troops in Yemen helping to locate missle launchers for airstrikes:

          https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/opinion/american-troops-yemen.html

          1. Fatty Bolger

            I believe they were stationed on the border. Of course it’s possible that there have been secret missions into the country that haven’t been made public.

          2. Stinky Wizzleteats

            I was making the assumption that there have been off the books missions into Yemen but can’t find any proof of that. I think it’s a pretty safe bet though.

          3. BakedPenguin

            Yeah, I’d take the ‘over’ on that.

        3. ChipsnSalsa

          And we joined in the naval blockade of Yemen.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_Yemen

    2. Rhywun

      If only a Dem were president so Congress wouldn’t have to waste their time on stupid shit like this.

  38. Wanton Wednesday!

    https://thechive.com/2019/04/17/blondes-or-brunettes-the-saga-continues-69-photos/

    None of these ladies are, at least currently, being attacked by kangaroos.

    1. Gustave Lytton

      The first thing I think of every time I sit down in a car is how much I need to snap a selfie.

    2. I was expecting Asians.

      1. Dudes. WOnton…? Judging by the lack of punning this morning, Swiss has turned y’all into yellow bellies.

        1. Rhywun

          Interesting slant to take.

          1. ::squints eyes::

          2. Tundra

            We’d better nip this in the bud before Swiss sees it.

          3. Faith restored.

    3. You know, the funny thing is I usually think blondes are more theoretically attractive, but in practice brunettes own me. Like I’ll ogle the blonde but then go fall in love with her brunette friend.

      1. Pat

        For me lighter hair draws the eye because of contrast. Blondes get an easier first look. But I’m generally more attracted to brunettes. And red hair is awful.

        1. You have no taste.

          Redheads are best.

          1. Pat

            I knew that was going to rankle someone, but I didn’t think it would be you.

        2. I’ve noticed a lot of guys go for blondes – even if the faces and bods aren’t the best – as long as the long blonde hair is there.

          I’m not that picky when it comes to hair color – but love long black or short-ish blonde hair the most.

    4. Pat

      20>23>5>47

      Pretty sure 39 is Ash from R6 Siege

  39. The Late P Brooks

    Don’t look in the mirror

    After allegations of a toxic workplace culture that discriminates against women and people of color, the Southern Poverty Law Center is trying to emerge and chart a way forward. Turmoil in the civil rights organization last month resulted in the firing of its famous founder and the resignations of its longtime president and legal director.

    Karen Baynes-Dunning, an African-American woman, was then appointed to run the organization as its interim president. She spoke publicly about the path forward this week, for the first time, with NPR.

    Founded in 1971, the SPLC is known for its work tracking and suing hate groups and for waging legal battles over issues like same-sex marriage, immigrant rights and treatment of prisoners.

    ————

    SPLC has also hired an outside consultant to analyze its workplace culture and make recommendations for reform.

    Conversations with current and former SPLC employees reveal how the organization, which is focused on social justice, has wrestled internally with a lack of inclusion and a management structure that concentrated power.

    “While there might have been increased diversity over the years, there was still not equity and there is still not inclusion,” said Dana Vickers Shelley. She was a director of public affairs at SPLC from November 2012 to March 2014 and is now executive director of the ACLU of Maryland. “You can hire faces. You can say, ‘Look, we’re diverse,’ but if the decisions are still being made by the white people in leadership, then you do not have inclusion.”

    Shelley says the SPLC’s brand promise is broken.

    That’s a convoluted way to say “grifters and shakedown artists get caught with hands in cookie jar.”

    I guess they meant well.

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      “Karen Baynes-Dunning, an African-American woman, was then appointed to run the organization as its interim president. “

      At least a minority will now get to profit from that shitpile of an organization. They should be happy.

      1. Rhywun

        Equity!

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      So the officers lied and a couple of people are dead. I can only assume manslaughter charges will be filed shortly and that one fellow’s pension will be pulled.

      1. Gustave Lytton

        Manslaughter? Isn’t death that occurs during the commission of a crime, or by the criminal’s associates, considered murder?

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          Hey, I agree, I’m just trying to be realistic. Then again manslaughter probably isn’t realistic here so why not aim big?

      2. Pat

        Lies were told, people formerly alive are no longer so.

        1. cyto

          You gotta toss a “totality of the circumstances” in there on this one, just to be sure…

        2. Gadfly

          Some people did something.

  40. The Late P Brooks

    There’s a material difference between “Get our boots off the ground” and “stop aiding the Saudis” I’m disappointed in whoever wrote that headline.

    You slay me.

  41. l0b0t

    OT – I’m really enjoying the Absolute Mad Lads series from Count Dankula.

    https://youtu.be/mvR_rgm2nBM

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      That is a good series. Who doesn’t love a good story about incestuous Scottish cannibals?

    2. Ditto, and I like that he’s branching out.

    3. BakedPenguin

      I watched the “Ice Cream Truck Wars” one last night.

      1. Tell me it’s a show where people shoot those obnoxious things using rocket launchers.

        1. BakedPenguin

          Well, one got a shotgun blast through the windshield.

          In 1980’s Scotland gangs figured out that “ice cream trucks” would be a good vehicle for dealing drugs. But they had to drive off competition, so the junkies would know where to go. Things go downhill from there.

          1. l0b0t

            That episode was bananas. I’m watching the one about Aum Shinrikio right now. Wow!

          2. BakedPenguin

            I’ll have to catch that one. The only problem is, I catch maybe about 60% of what’s spoken. I need to learn Scottish.

          3. l0b0t

            I love non-US television and the Scots stuff is, far and away, the hardest for me to grok at times. Mushmouthed Irish and Bumpkin Strine has nothing on them painted savages from the far north.

          4. Tundra

            Stream Radio Scotland

            It will help.

          5. l0b0t

            Holy Mackerel! That required a lot of scripts being approved, stupid Beeb. Thanks though – Jeeves & Wooster is on one of the channels and I’m gonna enjoy it.

  42. Gustave Lytton

    Awfully coincidental that Dershowitz has been one of the few voices of reason on the left and is now getting tarred with this allegation.

    1. wdalasio

      I kind of thought the same thing. I’m not saying it’s definitely impossible. But, I think more than an accusation should be necessary.

      1. cyto

        She has a map of where the airplane flew based on records from the airplane. What more do you want?

  43. Pope Jimbo

    TW: Powerline

    They have been doing a bang up job on covering the Noor trial though. Even they are not reflexively sucking cop dick for once. Great write up about the prosecution hammering the cop who was in charge of the on scene investigation.

    Get ready to be shocked, for some reason the cop’s body cam was turned off when she talked with Noor, but then turned on again later. The prosecution made her look bad by repeatedly asking why it was turned off.

    From what I’ve been reading, there are quite a few cops that deserve to lose their jobs for their actions during this investigation.

    1. Tundra

      Thanks. The NPR link is worth a read as well.

      They shot the wrong kind of person, plain and simple. A wealthy blonde from the safest neighborhood in the Twin Cities is their worst nightmare. Time for MPD to pay the piper.

      1. Tundra

        Then there’s this tidbit:

        Kathy Waite, now the department’s deputy chief, questioned why Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension agents chose to process Noor’s squad vehicle for evidence on site that night, rather than towing it to the impound lot for investigation.

        She told jurors the squad should not have been washed or returned to service.

        Waite also told the court Tuesday she did not hear anyone that night talk about a noise or a slap on the squad.

        Barnette was the police officer who sent Noor’s squad vehicle in to be cleaned and put back into service after the BCA returned it. She said that she talked to the BCA about it three times.

  44. Gadfly

    Bikini models being chased by Kangaroo.

    If the Kangaroo’s are to be charged with assault, will it be tried in a Kangaroo Court?

    /I’ll show myself out

    1. Pope Jimbo

      Please. Kangaroo punishments are handed out at Captain’s Mast.

    2. AlmightyJB

      Where the juries always jump to conclusions?

  45. The Late P Brooks

    What’s the matter with California?

    For thousands of Californians, President Donald Trump’s near-constant attacks on their home state have not caused offense. In fact, they’re kicking in millions of dollars so that he can do it for another four years.

    The president’s reelection campaign raised $1.7 million from California donors giving $200 or more in the first three months of 2019 — and no doubt even more from small-dollar donors in the state whose information does not have to be disclosed.

    ———-

    The president has a devoted core of fans in California, many of whom are willing to contribute significant sums of money to his reelection campaign despite appearing to lack the kind of wealth that California’s donor class typically possesses.

    While leading Democratic candidates like Harris and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker swept up big checks from Silicon Valley tech executives, Hollywood A-listers and high-powered attorneys and investors, the majority of Californians who donated $200 or more to Trump’s reelection campaign identified either as retirees, self-employed or in blue collar professions, including security guard, window cleaner, auto mechanic and secretary.

    The president received more contributions from carpenters — $1,590 — than from actors — $805.

    Stupid ungrateful hicks. Don’t they know Trump is destroying this nation?

    1. Pat

      But wait, I thought raising campaign funds from small donors was noble and proletarian?

    2. Gadfly

      The president received more contributions from carpenters — $1,590 — than from actors — $805.

      And I’m sure the president is quite happy about that. The talking points write themselves.

  46. cyto

    Ok, off into the weird. I jumped over to Jezebel to see if anything is cooking there. They seem nearly dead. But I did find this gem in a book review:

    Giving birth is an apocalypse: one world ends, another becomes. In Samantha Hunt’s Mr. Splitfoot, Cora sits alone in an office stairwell, hands on her stomach. “This baby,” she thinks, “even though it’s barely here—some half-dead, half-alive thing—I feel it, and it’s something big. To me at least, in all my smallness, this baby is really something very big.”

    There ya go…. paraphrasing the way that Southpark put it: “This is how they actually think”

    1. AlexinCT

      Ok, off into the weird. I jumped over to Jezebel to see if anything is cooking there.

      That’s like saying you were bored so you decided to jump into a pool full of scorpions, poisonous snakes/spiders, or STEVE SMITH!

  47. The Late P Brooks

    From what I’ve been reading, there are quite a few cops that deserve to lose their jobs for their actions during this investigation.

    Thin blue line! Break it, and the demons of chaos will devour us all.

  48. The Late P Brooks

    Tell me it’s a show where people shoot those obnoxious things using rocket launchers.

    Who would want to destroy this thing of beauty?

  49. ChipsnSalsa

    I ask the wife “How is the day going”

    her “good. history lesson… Reagan and taxes”

    me “Taxation is theft!”

    her “Sophia came to that conclusion on her own.”

    me “So proud”

    1. Pat

      Somewhere, someone on Twitter is typing up a fake quote from their 4 year old to totally DESTROY your parenting

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        My daughter is pissed that the city forces the residents to shovel the cities sidewalks (we aren’t blessed with one). It’s awesome.

        I just need to make sure she isn’t ready to force people to do what she wants them to.

        1. commodious spittoon

          You mean, like, paying someone to do it for you? Cuz I’m told paying someone to do something is literal slavery.

      2. l0b0t

        “…and then the whole restaurant clapped!”

        1. *crickets*

          “…please clap.”

          1. l0b0t

            That clip makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Moderns can’t even do dynasties properly.

    2. l0b0t

      Sigh… my 5yo just quotes The Simpsons; to the never ending consternation of his Hasidic school staff.

      1. robc

        At one time (I am out of practice), I was convinced I could go a whole day only quoting the Simpsons and be totally on topic at all times.

        1. l0b0t

          He’s been completely obsessed with monsters and Halloween for 3 years now (also dinosaurs, sharks, etc. but not as fiercely). Discovering the Treehouse Of Horror episodes has him positively gleeful.
          the reaction from his teachers is funny and reminds me of girl I knew who was majoring in Early Childhood Ed. at FSU. It was the early 1990s and she hated the show because “…it celebrates that little yellow boy sassing authority figures.”

          1. The Other Kevin

            In the early years of the Simpsons (late 80s) there was a Bart Simpson shirt that said “Bart Simpson: Underachiever and proud of it”. Some schools banned it. I owned one and wore it to school but they never said anything to me about it.

          2. Democratic Hitler

            And now look at you.

          3. B.P.

            When I was in grade school in the early eighties, I wore that shirt that said “Kill ’em all, let God sort ’em out” with a picture of a skull wearing a green beret all the time to school. No one gave a crap. That would warrant a school lockdown today.

          4. I had that same t-shirt. And a Dead Kennedys.

            I did have a homemade t-shirt for some obscure punk band where I wrote “Piss on the World”. English teacher, during class, put black tape over the Piss word. Which I promptly took off when I got out of class.

          5. l0b0t

            My Budweiser shirt and Budman Gilligan hat were perfectly cromulent in 10th grade but resulted in one having to wear one’s shirt inside out after a visit to the principal’s office in 11th grade.

          6. slumbrew

            My t-shirt with Nancy Reagan smoking a joint, saying “Just say yes!” was also OK.

    3. Old Man With Candy

      I hope she debunked properly and taught that taxes and spending went up during the Reagan regime.

      1. l0b0t

        Weren’t FedGov employees forced into Social Security during his tenure, or am I remembering incorrectly?

  50. The Late P Brooks

    Another little tidbit from that LA Times article:

    Just as the president has appealed to marginalized voters around the country, many of Trump’s donors in California are likely to have been hurt by the state’s soaring cost of living, left behind by an economic boom that has created immense wealth but also deepening inequality.

    They are spread across the state. People living in the greater Bay Area, a noted bastion of liberalism, gave more to Trump’s reelection than those from Republicans’ traditional epicenter, Orange County — $267,000 to $213,000. Donors from the Sacramento metropolitan area donated $112,000, while other Central Valley donors contributed $126,000.

    Huh. Something something lying eyes.

    1. Yusef drives a Kia

      The Wife says, Trump always says stupid shit,
      I say, like what?
      Blank stare…….

    2. Rhywun

      deepening inequality

      Translation: driving out the middle class.

  51. Suthenboy

    From LH comment at #15

    “Imagine an island where no one owns a gun. The probability that someone on that island is shot is zero.”

    We dont have to imagine it, we can just look at history. Or we can look at countries that prohibit guns today. Or we can look at cities/counties right here in our own country that prohibit guns today. They are/were ruled by the fist and the weak are brutalized and in chains. But then I think that is the point of gun control.

    1. l0b0t

      A wise man keeps telling me “Gun-grabbers lie. That’s what they do.” I’m pretty sure he’s right.

    2. wdalasio

      They are/were ruled by the fist and the weak are brutalized and in chains.

      Exactly this. The idiot’s entire argument rests on the assumption that guns are the only means to harm people. If there are other ways people may be harmed that a gun can deter, then the introduction of guns can create a lower probability of harm. Tamarkin (the author) should have to learn that lesson physically by being locked in a room with STEVE SMITH for a week.

    3. commodious spittoon

      First, assume a can opener.

    4. Pope Jimbo

      If I remember correctly, things didn’t work out so well for Piggy on that tropical island that was blessedly free of any evil guns.

  52. Blasey Ford makes Time’s 100 most influential list

    Christine Blasey Ford didn’t derail Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, but she at least has this consolation — she made Time Magazine’s list of 100 most influential people in the world. Not just the United States, the world.

    Time seems to be assuming that Blasey Ford’s allegation of attempted rape by Kavanaugh is true. Indeed, it turns the floor over to one of her most partisan defenders, Sen. Kamala Harris, to explain why Blasey Ford deserves to be on the list. If Blasey Ford’s allegations aren’t true, then it would be easy to dismiss her as a liar who tried, but failed, to affect the composition of the Supreme Court — thus hardly meriting special recognition by Time or anyone else.

    But on closer analysis, Blasey Ford deserves to be recognized for her influence regardless of the veracity of her account. As we have observed, Kavanaugh has not fully aligned himself with the conservative wing of the Supreme Court. Instead, he has formed an alliance” with Chief Justice Roberts. Together they have prevented the Court from becoming as conservative as many expected.

    1. Subwoofer

      Many of us weren’t terribly happy with the selection of Kavanaugh, but considering what they did to try and derail his confirmation he absolutely had to get through.

      1. MikeS

        It does make one wonder how things may have been different if Blasey Ford and the rest had never been part of it. If his past decisions and his views on the constitution had actually been discussed. Would some Republicans have actually voted no? I bet some Never-Trumpers would have liked to stick it to him…

    2. Rebel Scum

      regardless of the veracity of her account

      A noble lie?

    3. creech

      So by this criteria, Jussie makes the list next year.

      1. Democratic Hitler

        Person of the Year

        1. Rhywun

          Over my dead body!

          /AOC

          1. R C Dean

            You got yourself a deal.

          2. Democratic Hitler

            Uh oh, incitement.

  53. AlmightyJB

    “You know when your dead”

    We’ll, you’re not really dead then are you?

    https://www.foxnews.com/science/when-you-die-you-know-youre-dead-because-your-brain-keeps-working-scientist-claims

    1. The Other Kevin

      “I’m getting better!”

    2. AlmightyJB

      I wonder if you have a sudden appetite for brains?

    3. Stinky Wizzleteats

      The good news is there is life after death. The bad news is it’s pretty brief.

      1. Enjoy it while you can. I’m hoping for some raunchy flashbacks.

    4. well you-know-who made sure that wouldn’t happen.

  54. The Late P Brooks

    Vox haz a sad

    If economic forecasts are accurate, the IRS will end up collecting about $3.5 trillion from taxpayers to fund everything from the FBI and the US military to food stamps, Medicare, and Social Security. And if those forecasts are accurate, that’s about $1 trillion short of what Congress needs to fund the government.

    Pundits will surely blame the ballooning budget gap on three factors: the GOP’s massive corporate tax cuts, rich Americans who hide money in offshore accounts, and the growing number of retiring baby boomers who are tapping into Social Security.

    All three are responsible, but they’re not the only reasons the US government is short of money.

    Millions of Americans are simply not paying their taxes. For about every 30 taxpayers who file their tax returns each year, there’s one business or household that doesn’t. The amount of money they collectively owe is not trivial — about 14 million taxpayers owed $131 billion in taxes and penalties to the federal government in 2017, according to the latest IRS data.

    ———-

    Trump, whose family has been accused of tax evasion, has been all too willing to keep weakening the agency’s enforcement powers. His administration cut another 140 special agents from the IRS last year, and his proposed 2020 budget, for example, would cut funding for IRS enforcement by nearly $154 million.

    That would make it even harder for the IRS to collect unpaid taxes, pushing the US government even further into debt.

    Stealing from the government!

    The real thrust of the article: failure to remit payroll taxes to the IRS, not individuals who make oodles of money and then don’t file. And those darn Rethuglitards keep hamstringing the IRS!

    Not much in there about simplifying the tax code, oddly enough.

    1. AlmightyJB

      1.3 billion does not equal a trillion. Cut spending assholes.

    2. Tundra

      Simplify the code. Eliminate withholdings. Everyone makes quarterly estimates or cuts a check on 4/15.

      See how easy that is?

    3. You’re not giving the Mafia government the money it needs!

    4. The Other Kevin

      Even if they collected 100% of all the taxes owed, would that pay for all the spending in the current budget? My guess is a big fat NO.

      1. Subwoofer

        They would increase spending by an amount equivalent to 150% of that extra collected taxes, justified by the magic multiplier effect

    5. Rhywun

      Pundits will surely blame [laundry list of liberal talking points]

      Fuck you, cut spending.

      1. Democratic Hitler

        I particularly enjoyed “rich Americans who hide money in offshore accounts”. I mean, that’s probably most of the trillion dollar shortfall right there.

    6. Fatty Bolger

      And if those forecasts are accurate, that’s about $1 trillion short of what Congress needs to fund the government.

      Yes, they need that much. No way this country could survive on a mere $3.5 trillion.

      1. R C Dean

        I periodically check, and typically you could balance the budget every year if you spent what was spent 6 – 8 years ago.

        That’s right: Congress and Trump could balance the budget this year by just adopting the same spending as Obama’s first or second year as President.

        Yet, cutting spending to that level would somehow be catastrophic.

    7. Subwoofer

      I know a girl who doesn’t ever file her taxes, or even really pay them. She almost exclusively works for tips and so has basically no withholding, lives a lifestyle which won’t ever require her to present her 1040 for anything, and gets frequent cash infusions from random guys in her life. It pisses off my wife that she can get away with all that.

      One day the IRS is gonna come knocking and the bill will come due. The thing that frustrates me is that, when that day does come, they’ll probably settle with her for some minute fraction of what she owes in back taxes and some dude will give her the cash to cover it. So basically she’ll get away with never paying taxes while the rest of us write annual checks to Uncle Sam.

      1. Democratic Hitler

        Nothing’s stopping you from taking up a career in the exotic dance arts Subwoofer.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          YES THERE IS!

          Sincerely,

          Invisible Hand of the Market

      2. MikeS

        What pisses me off is people who get “refunds” for the mere fact that they have children.

        1. Well, that’s what you get for failing to contribute to the future industrial base of the union, comrade.

      3. Ugh – one of EF’s earliest divorce cases was for a woman whose husband made all of his money “under the table”. And quite illegally too.

        He started a charity to help “disadvantaged children”, made TV commercials for local businesses but had them pay the charity. Everything in his life, including his numerous personal shopping trips, were paid for by charity using its credit card. Time to buy a house? Well he couldn’t get a mortgage because he had no verifiable “income” so instead he did a land-contract. Need a car? Buy one – cash – from a car dealership he did work for.

    8. AlexinCT

      Stealing from the government!

      I had a progressive at work get furious on me when I told them I hoped Trump had done his best to pay the least amount of taxes possible. In fact, I pointed out if I ever was on a jury (good luck with that) where someone was being charged with tax evasion, I would very likely vote to acquit or hang the jury if said person was not a pro tax asshat. When asked why I would feel that way I pointed out I considered taxation theft, and that I would ONLY hold the people demanding everyone pay more taxes accountable for tax fraud of any kind. Man she was pissed at me…

    1. Yusef drives a Kia

      Fucking gross, just smoke it and quit being stupid

    2. Rhywun

      cannabidiol, or CBD, does not have any psychoactive effects

      Not really. But they’re sure marketing it as one.

      1. Rhywun

        *I mean, “Not really a potburger”

      2. Yusef drives a Kia

        It certainly has a calming effect, I know…….

        1. Tundra

          That’s THC. Hemp-based CBD has almost none.

          1. Yusef drives a Kia

            No, that’s CBD, I take 5mg. Drops every morning, no high, just calm, helps me drive in traffic without killing people.

          2. AlexinCT

            What’s the fun in that?

          3. Yusef drives a Kia

            I don’t get high at work, too dangerous

  55. The Late P Brooks

    Eliminate withholdings. Everyone makes quarterly estimates or cuts a check on 4/15.

    If people had to write a monthly check to the govt for “services rendered” (har dee fucking har) just like they pay for the electric and gas and cable, they might pay a little closer attention.

    We wouldn’t want that.

    1. slumbrew

      That’d be nice.

      If nothing else, move Tax Day to the day before Election Day.

      1. Rhywun

        I think we all know that these decisions were deliberately made to shield the government from the taxpayers’ ire and have absolutely zero chance of being altered.

  56. The Late P Brooks

    Christine Blasey Ford didn’t derail Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, but she at least has this consolation — she made Time Magazine’s list of 100 most influential people in the world.

    Lies, damned lies, and Time Magazine.

  57. The Late P Brooks

    Horrific Spectre Looms

    President Donald Trump suggested Monday that he will follow through on his threat to send migrants detained at the southern border to so-called sanctuary cities, a move he sees as a way to punish Democrats who disagree with his hard-line anti-immigration policies. The apparent executive-order-by-tweet came just days after he sent out a heinous propaganda video splicing images from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks into a speech by Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar. And that smear of one of the first Muslim women elected to Congress came about a week after Trump forced Kirstjen Nielsen out as secretary of homeland security, reportedly because she wasn’t cruel and lawless enough for his tastes.

    Taken together, Trump’s actions are xenophobic, dangerous, and possibly illegal. They also offer a particularly grim preview of what the next two years of his reelection campaign will look like. This sort of demagoguery has long been Trump’s default posture, but coming from a president with a, um, limited attention span, the recent burst almost looks like message discipline.

    ————-

    there’s also no reason to doubt that racial resentment will be the motivating force of his reelection effort. It has been the unifying theme of his politics since well before he cannonballed into the GOP primary four years ago this summer. This is the guy who laid the groundwork for his run by repeatedly claiming that the nation’s first black president had no right to be in the Oval Office, then kicked off his campaign with a jeremiad against Mexicans, and followed that up by calling for a Muslim ban. It should not have been a surprise that his inaugural address was littered with racism. Or that he proposed one version of a Muslim ban after another. Or that now he’s trying to twist the memory of 9/11 into an Islamophobic weapon against the nation’s first hijab-clad congresswoman. Trump told us who he was then, and he’s telling us who is he now. On this at least, we can believe him.

    He eats babies of color for breakfast.

    1. Rhywun

      Islam… hm, yep – still not a “race”.

    2. R C Dean

      Or that now he’s trying to twist the memory of 9/11 into an Islamophobic weapon against the nation’s first hijab-clad congresswoman.

      I recall a retweet of the NY Post cover which juxtaposed her exact words with a picture of what she was referring to. Has Trump done anything else on Omar’s view that Islamists killing 3,000 Americans is no big deal, and her call for Muslims to accost anyone who they think is looking at them funny?

    3. Pope Jimbo

      I have to admit that I have found it extremely funny to watch DiBlasio bitching about how Trump is acting illegally when he threatens to send illegals to NYC. A city that has taken the bold step of publicly declaring that it would thumb its nose at Federal law and offer sanctuary to illegal aliens.

      “When we act illegally, it is because we are so pure and wonderful. But when the bad orange man does something illegal, he needs to be stopped!”

      1. Rhywun

        It’s not even illegal. Refugees are settled in specific cities all the time.

        1. Tundra

          Bullshit. The Somalis chose the Twin Cities because of the climate similarities to their homeland.

          1. Pope Jimbo

            Scratch a Norwegian or a Swede and you find a Somali.

          2. Pan Zagloba

            “Where are…muh roads?!”

      2. Pan Zagloba

        This broke my brain.

        List of 20 top metro areas where illegal immigrants live.

        List of sanctuary cities. (Wikipedia, and this is only ‘official’ stuff and not ‘we made no declaration but we really don’t bother’)

        There is significant overlap between the two. Which makes sense because, unless you have a job lined up, where would you go? A place full of MAGA racists who want you gone or a place full of people like you where ICE is held at arm’s length.

        So why are Democrats bitching?! He’s delivering next generation of constituents to them, he’s increasing their representation by census, and it’s more convenient for migrants than dodging the border patrol and making your way on your own. These people are not going to live in leafy, expensive and pale-faced areas where people like Pelosi or those who donate to her live. All it will do is add more pressure to increase spending (something they are in favor of), expand the government services (ditto) and lower the price of unskilled labor that the well-off benefit from the most.

        This broke my brain.

        Trump: “You know, I’ll take over for coyotes once we catch the migrants and deliver them to where they were probably going.”
        “REEEEE” “MAGA OWNAGE!”

        1. Rhywun

          Total ownage. That’s why they’re mad. They don’t give a flying fuck about the refugee/migrants or they wouldn’t be agitating for dumping them into the streets of border towns to fend for themselves.