Category: Musings

  • Reviews You’ll Never Use: Texas Frightmare Weekend 2019 Edition

    Hello Glibs, it’s been awhile, but your old Master of Scaremonies the Cryptkeeper is here to provide my annual superfuntimestory of the bestest holiday on my calendar outside of Halloween – Texas Frightmare Weekend! This article is *at least* five times as long as it needs to be, because I know you’re reading this at work and I’m trying to give you an excuse to not get back to that for an extra 10 minutes. You’re welcome. Do keep reading, though – there’s lots of cursing, lame jokes, celebrity stories, and a 40k reference for my fellow hyper-nerds. Plus I had fun last year with our game of, “There are so many links, I wonder which one of them randomly goes to a weird porn site?” that I decided to play again this year. Happy hunting!

    To begin with, this shit has gotten completely out of hand. They sold out of Saturday single day tickets (est. attendance this year of 35,000), and the fucking hotel rooms sold out at the main venue within two hours of going on sale. We were able to snag a room at the last second because they caught some dude reserving 20 rooms and trying to re-lease them out at a markup. Thankfully the dumbass advertised them on the Facebook meetup page for the event, so the organizer cancelled his block reservation & they opened the rooms back up. My wife received an automatic update and we jumped on one. True story: we got the last one, and it wound up being a handicapped room. It was YUUUGE. Like twice the size of a regular room. What’s a fucking cripple need with all that space? Don’t they need less space? It’s not like they’re prancing about or have friends that they can invite up or anything else requiring room. Even the shower was much larger. Don’t just take my word for it, here’s a photo. It’s so big you don’t even get the edge of the bed in frame.

    Seriously, I could do cartwheels in it if I wasn't old and fat and straight.
    Crip room

    Now most, if not all of you, are probably mentally saying to me, “Gojira, we know that Texas Frightmare Weekend is always held on the first weekend of May. So why come this year, Dallas Fan Expo, the larger (50k+ attendance) pop culture, sci-fi, and comic book convention that used to be called Dallas Comic Con, moved its date to directly compete? Aren’t they targeting the same people?” Well astute reader, indeed that was the plan – of the FanExpo organizer. Here’s a little inside baseball for you, as was related to me by a buddy of mine involved in the whole sordid affair: FanExpo wanted to be the only game in town & approached the Texas Frightmare organizer, Loyd Cryer, about buying him out. He told them to fuck off and die in a fire (paraphrasing mine -ed). In what is possibly an act of pure spite, which is just my conjecture and in no way libelous, FanExpo moved their event to the same weekend. I think their big-shot corporate overlords thought that the nerdy public is one undifferentiated mass, and that being the larger event with more headline guests, they would draw interest and put a little bit of a beat-down on ol’ Texas Frightmare.

    Turns out the Venn Diagram of people who are comic book and pop culture nerds, and people who are hardcore horror fans, does have overlap, but not nearly to the degree that the FanExpo jerks had hoped. I do fear, though, that this blatant act of separatism has resulted in some unfortunate battlelines being drawn and our two populations being given reason to resent and distrust one another. Thanks alot, FanExpo! If I ever see Jonathan Frakes on the street, I’ll fuckin’ kill him and leave a human turd on his forehead and a little note written on a cocktail napkin that says, “Defend Horror” written in his blood and pinned to his body with a little plastic sword along with some photos of those abused dogs from the SPCA commercials.

    Interestingly, the above paragraph wasn’t just one long setup to a largely unfunny joke about murdering Will Riker. There really is a distinct difference between the two groups, and if you swing both ways, as I do [insert “Oh My!” George Takei gif], you notice it when surrounded entirely by one group or the other. By and large the horror crowd, where I spend more time, is more…enthusiastic…about ordering their lifestyle around their interests. They don’t just dye their hair, they have a shit-load of tats and piercings, dress somewhat raggedly, curse a lot more, drink a lot more, and are generally more “blue collar” types. They also skew distinctly more conservative. There are a lot more pro-2A shirts, and shirts making fun of liberals, at horror events, than shirts or patches with leftist slogans. Hell, I saw a couple of Confederate flag patches on vests this weekend, and nobody gave them a second glance. For all you aspies rushing to the comments to correct me that it’s actually the battle flag of Northern Virginia or whatever the hell, save yourselves the spittle-flecked outrage. When I say, “Confederate flag”, you damn well know what I’m talking about, so just simmer down and roll with it. If you promise not to be a ludicrous pendant, I’ll not purposefully replace the word “magazine” with “clip” in any future firearms articles I may write.

    The thing is, I’m not sure why this is. This is a group of people who are obviously comfortable with, shall we say, non-traditional mores in terms of public behavior, modes of dress, etc., and yet they actually skew conservative. The sci-fi/comic crowd is overwhelmingly leftist, but they also are overwhelmingly just fat guys able to take off their blue TOS shirts at the end of the day and blend back into “regular” society. I can’t help but wonder why this is. I’m sure Ken Shultz has a theory that he’d like to expound on (just ribbing you in good nature, Ken). Joe Bob Briggs mentioned it during his panel, as well, so it’s not just me making shit up…this time.

    So not as many photos this year, for which I apologize. If you haven’t read my past entries on this event, be warned: this is literally the only time of the year I take photos, so I cannot be assed to get good at it because I just don’t care. Anyway, even five years ago, when you purchased an autograph from a guest, it came with a selfie. Now every one of these greedy fucks charges an extra $10, except for a few who are cool.

    Plus he looks fabulous for his age. Wood.
    Bruce Abbot is cool. He does not charge extra.

    I will note that they didn’t have glowsticks available at the after party again this year. I think our little art project that I showed you all photos of in the 2017 entry put the kibosh on that for everybody. At least I hope that’s why there weren’t any. I’d love to believe that my one merry band of assholes managed to ruin something for tens of thousands of people. It’d put me right up there with John Dillinger.

    Great guests though, and great panels. We had Jeffrey Combs, who given his wonderful Star Trek roles would have been just as at home at FanExpo, but he’s also done great work in horror. I’m a huge Jeffrey Combs fanboy, so this was a special treat for me. We had Meat Loaf, who fell off the fucking stage at his panel and broke his collarbone. Looks great for his age, though, really. Jenna Jameson, on the other hand, does not. Her ass looked like a fucking tray table. I wanted to set my drink on it, then smack her hard in the face and see if the drink fell off. It doesn’t show up in google image search, oddly enough. Trust me, I wanted to add a picture. Traci Lords has aged a bit better, and Cassandra Peterson (better known as Elvira) I’d still drill like an out of control oil rig. The big guns were Sam Raimi and Bruce Campbell, along with Sam’s brother Ted Raimi. Robert Englund, Lance Henrickson, Tom Savini, and various other regular guests were in the house, as well as…Lee Majors! Scott Ian and Charlie Benante of Anthrax were also present, and the corpse of Tim Curry. Along with many other assorted peoples who had roles in some sequels or other.

    Seriously though, I just felt bad for Tim Curry. To get “his” autograph, you had to give his handlers the merch, then they’d mail it back to you later, signed. Yeah, sure pal, I totally believe that’s a legit signature that you can’t do in front of me because reasons. They wheeled him around for his photo ops, and he was just sitting there all stroked out. I’m poking fun, but really, I feel for the guy. If you saw him, you’d swear they were only keeping him alive in a high-tech chair out of fear that when he dies the psychic beacon that emanates from him that provides the only known fixed point by which to navigate the warp will blink out and the galaxy will be rent asunder by Chaos. He looked that bad. Plus I saw them sacrifice a few thousand psykers to get him through the second day. They did it in Convention Hall B.

    The year started off with a screening of Re-Animator on Thursday night, with Jeffrey Combs, Bruce Abbot, and Barbara Crampton (who, like Elvira, is still super do-able despite being old) in attendance to do a panel. They also had Kathleen Kinmont from Bride of Re-Animator, but really who cares about her. She does reappear later in our narrative in a humorous role, so that’s something I suppose. In addition to their panel at the screening, they had a panel during the main convention.

    Nothing really funny to say about this
    The Re-Animator panel

    The panel was great in that, rather than just tell stories, almost the whole thing focused on the craft of filmmaking, particularly low-budget film making in the 80s. Without going into great detail, they spoke about the long days on low-budget shoots (14-18 hrs per day, as principal photography had to be completed in 18 days), and about how big name actors can get away with being aloof, but working in the nooks and crannies, the only way to get a good performance is for the actors to be completely emotionally available to each other in order to create instant chemistry. They mentioned that, as they all were coming from theater backgrounds, they got together at Barbara’s apartment for a few weeks beforehand to rehearse, which is a big no-no if SAG finds out about it because it constitutes working without pay. Jeffrey mentioned that sometimes having fewer resources forces the director and editor to make tighter, better choices, because when given infinite time and money, some people go overboard and don’t know when enough is enough. He also mentioned that, back when you had to actually film on, you know, film, low-budget productions would purchase things called “ends”. These were the chopped off leftovers of film reels after standard budget films were done using the reels. They’d cut off what was left and sell it cheap. So it was a great way to accumulate film on a tight budget, but you’d only be able to do like 3 minutes on each one and it was annoying to have to work through. As for the audience questions, it’s bizarrely awkward to ask a question to a woman whose tits & bush you just saw, along with her about to get eaten out by a revenant holding its own severed head between her legs (if you haven’t seen Re-Animator, stop what you’re doing and watch it now. It’s better than any Marvel film by x1000).

    The Lee Majors Q&A was a bit depressing. Due to the way television contracts were structured back then, he never saw a dime from any Steve Austin merchandise, and indeed claims to have had no idea so much of it was ever produced until he started doing conventions. He spoke about the old snobbery that shut out television stars from film productions, and told a funny anecdote about how he loved Bill Shatner when he worked with him, but that Shat had a tendency to, “die to the balcony”. He explained that it’s theater slang for wildly over-acting. He also talked about how Andre the Giant, when playing sasquatch on the show, pissed in the suit all the time, which was super gross, but was also the nicest guy in person you could ever hope to meet, which was super great.

    Joe Bob Briggs did a good panel, and spoke about the state of trash cinema and its relative place in modern film production vs. where it was when he got started way back when. He and I chatted a bit about small towns in west Texas. He didn’t think I’d know a few of the places where he’d lived, but I went to college in Lubbock, and so we shared some fond memories of a shitty place that is populated entirely by people who fail out of that college. Another really nice guy. Honestly, the only person who has ever been a dick to us after all these years that we’ve been going was Billy Zane. I still think that, much like Georgia against Texas this past year, Alabama against Oklahoma in that Sugar Bowl a few years back, or Florida against Louisville a few years before that, he just didn’t want to be there and therefore that magically excuses shitty performances.

    We bought a few stupid things, like a full-size xenomorph skull

    Ima use it for weird sex stuff
    So I own this now, I guess.

    because I’m buddies with that vendor and he gave it to me for wholesale. There were some good costumes, but frankly the best ones were people who come every year, and I already took pictures of them and showed you all over the last couple of years. So below are some pics from this year, but not nearly as many. Karaoke on Sat. night was awful, like always, though everybody was in a good mood. Kathleen Kinmont showed up to rock out, but was wasted and happened to share an elevator with us back up to our floor. She was drunk enough that she didn’t stop singing or rocking out once off the stage – it went for the whole elevator ride. There were no infamous David Arquette episodes, however (fun fact: right before he got on stage that night, he bought me a beer at the bar. I didn’t know until later that he was supposed to have been on the wagon. Whoops). I’m also now turning it into an annual tradition to bum a smoke off of Lance Henrikson. Nice guy, but seriously, American Spirits? C’mon, Lance, I wanna see some fancy Hollywood cigarettes.

    The year ended with the Sam & Ted Raimi with Bruce Campbell panel. It was really a treat. They’ve known each other since middle school, and told great stories about each other growing up. Sam busted Bruce’s chops constantly, and they told stories about all the things they did as they went around Detroit trying to scrounge up money to make Evil Dead. Sam Raimi has an annoyingly nasally voice, FYI. Anyway the highlight of the panel was, when half the room is raising their hand to ask a question, a particular person who was picked stood up and asked them their opinion on Mac and Me, a shitty 1988 E.T. knockoff. Now keep in mind, none of the panelists had a blessed thing to do with that abomination of a movie. Nothing. It was the non-sequitur from hell. They were so confused they didn’t even know what he was asking – Ted kept thinking he was asking about “mac and cheese”. The moderator even face-palmed and said under his breath but still audibly into the mike, “You get a chance to ask these guys a question and you ask about fucking Mac and Me?” and you could hear the exasperation in his voice. I mean it was bizarre. The questioner was booed down, and after the panel ended and I was waiting outside for my wife to use the restroom, Ted, Sam, and Bruce came out through that side hallway. They were still talking about that, making fun of the guy and wondering what the fuck he was talking about. Seriously, this is like getting to go back in time and pose a question to George Washington, and all you can come up with is asking him if he likes the new Prius body style.

    So that was this years (mis)adventure. I was quasi-drunk for most of it and blew $1,500 in three days, but fuck it, that’s why I fight for $15. I look forward to updating you all on the event’s 15th iteration next year, if you don’t see me in the news for bombing FanExpo beforehand.

    SERIOUSLY FUCK THIS DUDE
    TWO evil elevator movies from the same director? You’re fucking telling me that you made one evil elevator movie, looked yourself in the mirror and said, “You know what? Ima do it again. The world needs another killer elevator movie.”
    Bonus points for anyone who gets the reference on my shirt. If you need a closer look, it's also in the Bruce Abbott photo.
    Me in front of a legit 73′ Oldsmobile Delta 88, from the film Evil Dead.
    Plus a random slut apparently on her period
    Somebody dressed as the bad guy from Army of Darkness
    herp derp alt text
    Here’s one you don’t see every convention: a guy dressed like Dr. Loomis. Though he still had that fucking Walking Dead baseball bat, so fuck him.
    Seriously, I don't have to be "on" all the time. Provide your own fucking alt-text.
    The “battle Delta”, the Delta 88 transformed for combat at the end of Army of Darkness
    Which I suppose would be one redeeming quality : P
    This person has cleverly turned a book into a monster. My wife tells me it has something to do with Harry Potter, and is therefore un-Christian.
    Speaking of which, I'd still fuck Blondie.
    I just thought it was funny that this guy was dressed like a fascist, his name for the karaoke was like “Lord Commander” or some shit like that, and he sang fucking Blondie.
    Some leftist media site will be blaming this comic for at least 18 suicides by next week
    I love the difference between horror cons and other cons. Here, for example, instead of ripped dudes in tight clothes saving the world, we have family-friendly comics with titles like, “Lets All Die!”
    Randos in costume
    "You gotta creep, creep..."
    Some dude dressed as the Creeper
    I hope he went all method and made his pubes mossy as well
    This was a clever one. He’s dressed like Stephen King’s poor character from the movie Creepshow.
    Though I do wonder how well he sees.
    Clever Nightmare on Elm Street costume. More clever than the 1,000 Freddy’s walking around the convention, at any rate.
    Really if you love 70s Italian slashers, this is a great costume
    Remember when I did a series of film reviews that focused on the giallo genre? This guy gets it.
    Also, wood.
    The Death Note guy was here the last few years, but the chick’s demon costume was super intricate and she ended up winning the contest on Friday night I believe. The most important thing is she was hot.
    I mean they're marketing it directly to us now. Not even pretending anymore.
    OK now this is what is wrong with the world. This is the side of the box of a Castle Greyskull re-issue toy. Notice that, unlike, say, the original Castle Greyskull box, the person shown enjoying it is not a 5 year old boy, but rather a 35 year old “man” with a shit-eating grin on his face and I FUCKING WANT THAT CASTLE GREYSKULL.
    But not *too* cute, if you're reading this Chris Hansen
    A little kid dressed as Nosferatu. I thought it was cute.
    Also, kill yourself
    A shirt for little kids. If you don’t know what the Pork-Chop Express is, stop reading my fucking column.
    Hopefully it'll scare him out of being the little panty-waste that he is
    Another great example of horror culture – a children’s book titled, “I Like To Eat Children”. And yes, I bought it for one of my nephews.
    Eh, I dunno if I wood or wood knot - looks like she's keeping a lot held back with that corset
    Another pretty well done costume
    It may be a couple hundred bucks clever - that sign better be denominated in fucking pesos.
    I thought this was clever – the guy made a medusa skull.
    HOLY SHIT IT'S BEEN A WEEK AND I STILL CAN'T BELIEVE IT
    Remember when I mentioned in one of my film reviews about Anthropophagus, the giallo film about the crazy cannibal who at the end of the movie eats his own intestines? SOMEBODY MADE A FUCKING DOLL FOR THAT MOVIE HOLY SHIT
    W...T...F
    Weird nazi porn. “Deported Women of the SS Special Section” and “Gestapo’s Last Orgy”.
    ...or is it?
    Shit, it’s better than concentration camp porn
    Really cracker jack job on the costume, though
    This guy was the rarest thing of all at a convention – an original character. Sadly because it’s an original character I completely forgot it’s name and the youtube channel the people were trying to tell me to subscribe to where they upload their short films.
    Pretty good idea actually, all in all
    Ash Predator. He’s the Predator, but with a ripped blue shirt, chainsaw hand, shotgun slung on his back, and a deadite-colored severed head of another predator.
    Jokes on him, I still got it!
    Scott Ian of Anthrax making sure I know I’m not supposed to be taking a picture of him.
    He could tattoo Cthulu onto my dick since everybody who sees it goes insane
    Two tattoo artists this year. The wife and I are seriously thinking of signing up for a flash next year, which is really all they do given the time constraints.
    Also, wood
    Randumb decoration on a table. Only at Texas Frightmare.
    If any of you actually pay money to see it though, you're a dumbass. It wasn't money-spending good.
    Look in the background – it’s advertising a movie called Velocipastor that we saw for free that Friday night about a priest who turns into a were-dinosaur and saves Chinese prostitutes. It…was…awesome.

     

  • Muh Culture!!: Conservative Values in a Libertarian Society

    10Politics is downstream from culture.

    This has become a popular turn of phrase in conservative and libertarian circles.  And, by all means, there’s certainly a lot of truth to it.  But, I think it misses an incredibly important point.  It’s a mistake to treat culture itself as an entirely exogenous variable.  Culture doesn’t happen in a vacuum.  Culture itself is shaped and altered by policy, and consequently politics.  That is to say, if politics is downstream from culture, it’s also a tributary into the culture.

    But, how do politics shape culture, you might ask.  Well, you first have to consider the nature of what is culture.  Culture is the manifestation of the social beliefs, values, conventions and tastes shared by a group of people.  But, all of those things happen in the context of the success they produce for those who practice them.  A great many, if not all, cultural traits arise because they work.  They provide a practical advantage in the conditions in which they are adopted.  In fact, they very well may become elements of the culture precisely because they provide such advantages.  Success breeds imitation and imitation breeds institutionalization.  To the point that the initial advantage may well be beside the point.  But those conditions are hugely affected by the politics prevalent in the society in which they are adopted.

    As just one example, you see longstanding reputations for a poor work ethic for certain cultures.  Why would that be?  I’m not saying that it’s not just the random interplay of luck or providence with certainty.  But, you find a remarkable correlation of those cultures regarded as having poor work ethics and those cultures with high levels of official predation.  For the libertarian, this relationship should be obvious.  If the consequence of your busting your behind is just going to be that the guy with the club bashes you over the head and takes your stuff, busting your butt is a suckers’ game.  It’s not surprising, then, that you don’t see work elevated to a particularly high status in those societies.

    All of which brings us to a point of contention between libertarians and social conservatives.  “What sort of licentious den of iniquity would a libertarian society look like,” social conservatives ask, “without laws to uphold standards of decency and public morality”.  And if their solution is an abysmal one, their concerns aren’t necessarily unreasonable.  I think it is fair to say that, at least in some ways, we’ve become a coarser, less responsible (if more “genuine”, whatever the hell that means) society over the last few generations.

    I think the point they miss is not that politics is downstream from culture, but the fact that politics is a tributary into culture.  A libertarian society would create a particular form of culture.  And in many regards, that culture would be remarkably conservative in its values, habits and behaviors.  In many regards, libertopia would look much more like Mayberry than like Mad Max.

    This notion might seem counter-intuitive at first glance.  How can a society that provides less, or even no, enforcement of traditional values have more popular adherence to traditional values?  Because traditional values, for the most part, work.  Not universally.  Not perfectly flawlessly.  And developments might make them less useful over time.  But, as a general rule, adhering to them makes for a better life.  You’re more likely to be successful, happy, and fulfilled if you work hard, don’t philander, stay in school, exercise sobriety or at least moderation, and have an active spiritual life.

    And, in a libertarian society, you’re much more responsible for ensuring your own success than you are under the status quo.  Absent the mandated, state-sponsored, safety net, the consequences of vice are more likely to fall on those engaged in that vice.  Not only does that affect incentives, that change in incentives can change the culture.  If a behavior makes you less successful, that behavior becomes less popular and that change in popularity itself makes that behavior less acceptable.

    The cost of vice, though, regularly indulged in, isn’t trivial.  You don’t have a lot of prospects in the world if you regularly show up to work hung over or coming down from a cocaine bender.  Single motherhood, absent outside help, is a major life challenge to the single mother as much as the child.  And being a “player” is a bad reputation because it’s more likely to leave his female romantic prospects in that situation.  A liar or a cheat is something that you don’t want to be because your audience has significant incentive not to trust you.  In a libertarian society, simple reality provides strong incentives to avoid vice.

    But those incentives are not in play under the status quo.  The safety net provides a floor on the consequences of vice.  You don’t have to believe the cliché of the welfare mother pumping out babies to increase her welfare check to understand that that check does reduce her downside to having sex with a guy who isn’t going to support her.  And, on the margins, that matters.  You don’t have to be a teetotaler panicking about the dangers of demon rum to recognize that some people will indulge in the nightlife more aggressively if getting fired means they’ve lost their only source of income.

    Now, living with the consequences of your vices might seem a brutal, even vicious means of punishment.  Harsher, perhaps, than the legal penalties imposed by the social conservatives.  However, the removal of the state-sponsored safety net doesn’t mean the abandonment of any safety net.  It’s not the case that, before 1932, every minor transgression in human behavior meant certain ruin.  People relied on civil society for their safety net.  They turned to their churches, the local lodge of their fraternal organizations, their unions and private charities for help when they’d fallen on hard times.

    But, unlike the government, these institutions had an ability to draw distinctions, to discriminate.  They could demand the person asking for their help change his behavior and refuse him assistance if he didn’t change.  But, the government can’t do that.  And I’m not sure I’d want it to be able to.  Not only is there a real matter of equal protection to consider, but the concentrated political demands of those demanding assistance despite their vices provide a much more powerful constituency than the diffuse expectations of those expected to pay for it.

    Unfortunately, the space of civil society has fallen dramatically.  In his 1995 essay Bowling Alone, Robert Putnam discussed the decline in American “social capital” and civil society in the post-World War II era.  One of the examples he cites is the decline in bowling league participation even as the number of bowlers has increased (hence the title of his essay).  However, this was not always the case.  Consider this quote from Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America,

    “In the United States, as soon as several inhabitants have taken an opinion or an idea they wish to promote in society, they seek each other out and unite together once they have made contact. From that moment, they are no longer isolated but have become a power seen from afar whose activities serve as an example and whose words are heeded”

    The America that de Tocqueville was describing was the America of the 1830’s.  It was an America where the government played, at most, a negligible role in the life of the country of the life of most citizens.  And what he found astonished him.  This was in contrast to his experience in the more heavily ruled and governed Europe, where such institutions were much sparser.  Huge swaths of the American civil society that remain with us to this day were formed in this era preceding the rise of the government leviathan, the SPCA, the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, various local hospitals, various colleges.

    Putnam examines and largely dismisses the notion that this phenomenon might be a result of women entering the workforce.  Instead, he suggests, the more likely cause is the rise of television.  What he misses is the explosion in the size and scope of government at all levels:

    Government grows at the expense of civil society.  There’s a crowding out effect.  And that reduced role for civil society translates to a diminished respect for traditional values.  It’s not shocking, to me at least, that the Baby Boom generation, the first to grow up with this expanded role of government as normal, was the first that turned away from both civil society and traditional values.

    “But,” a hypothetical social conservative might counter, “even if limited government will give us much the same thing, surely the right top men could institute policies that would get us there faster.”   But, that’s doubtful.  As I note before, vice will inevitably have a greater constituency than its absence.  Vice, after all, is fun, at least while you’re doing it.  And trying to tamp out others’ fun makes you, well, kind of a killjoy.  So, when you leave these decisions to the government, there’s going to be an inevitable drift toward vice.  That is unless there is an ongoing expenditure of energy on new moral crusades, which people tire of eventually, anyway, the inevitable trend is toward vice.

    So, in a world where politics is downstream from culture and where culture is downstream from politics, the sensible stand for social conservatives is actually libertarianism.  While it may not give them their ideal world, it is a world far closer to it than they can hope to achieve through ever-expanding government.

  • Crackpot Corner: The STEVE SMITH Conspiracy?

    Dobbshead!

    Have you ever noticed that STEVE SMITH doesn’t like to talk about the Yeti?  There must be something there, something that he doesn’t want us looking into.

    Well, what race of humans are descended from the Yeti?  Of course, the Yetisyn, also known as the Subgenii.  But why, WHY would our local cryptids want to keep us away from the slackful?  Is it just because of the high infiltration of douchebags since the fires of the ’70 burned out?  Or is it something darker… pinker… could STEVE SMITH be a member of The Conspiracy?  Could he be shaping the Glibertarians to use as a weapon to drive away the X-ists and snuff out the word of “Bob?”

    Obviously, there is a connection, STEVE SMITH admits he’s a blood relation.  But did you notice which members of the commentariat didn’t pass through the fires of the Englibbening?  That’s right — the (Stark) Fist of Etiquette and Agile Cyborg (who obviously drank deeply of the vaginal fluids of Connie Dobbs).

    So, was STEVE SMITH purifying his church?

    Or are we the baddies?

  • Minnesota Nice Meetup

    Tomorrow is the big day. Finally, after years of lurking and then hesitant posting, I’d have a chance to meet some Minnesota Glibs. I’m a little excited, not in a sexual way, but more in “be prepared for a science test in high school” way. So it’s off to bed, hoping to get a good night’s sleep.

    Tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow…somewhere in the darkness I drifted off to sleep, just like Kenny Rogers’ “Gambler.” I’m all prepared, I have my clothes all laid out. I’d ironed my newest bib overalls, using spray starch to get the crisp crease, found my Christmas flannel shirt and I want to look my best so I’m going to wear the bow tie that has the flashing lights. I’ll have to remember to check the batteries to make sure the lights work alternately and will switch to both lights blinking together. As I get ready I decide to use some hair pomade but Dixie Peach is hard to find here so I went with the regular brand. I opened up the can of Bag Balm and it was nearly empty! I was able to use my little finger around the corners of the can and got about a tablespoon, not much but it will have to do. I made a mental note to get the economy size the next time I was in Tractor Supply. I want everything to be perfect, first impressions are important, just as Miss Sawyer said in English class.

    For a while I had thought for the occasion I’d wear my white painter’s bibs, the ones that have the Dickie’s logo on the patch in the front, but I couldn’t get enough of pine tar out of the knees from the day I helped my friend Gus unload a truck full of rough sawed pine. Besides, it’s not formal and the fashion magazines all say no white after Labor Day. Boots for the meet up ’cause I want to look manly but I won’t turn the socks down, I don’t want to appear pretentious. I checked my bow tie, making sure the wire to the batteries was hidden inside my shirt, a trick I’d learned from my older brother. I’d better stop and get extra batteries, I don’t want the lights to quit blinking halfway through the meet up. Checked myself in the ceiling mirror in the bedroom and I knew I was ready.

    Make the long drive to Minneapolis-actually to a northern suburb-to meet Pope Jimbo, Tundra and A Leap at the Wheel for the very first time. I know these fellas from their witticisms on the Glibertarians site. I don’t really know them, but I mean that’s where I’ve seen their well thought out insights and comedy efforts that always produce either awe or a hearty chuckle. We’re meeting at the Conference Room in Caribou Coffee and I admit to being a little nervous.

    I check in with the receptionist, a pert but matronly young lady- I would guess a high school drop out with two kids but studying for her GED ’cause her boyfriend wants her to get into Cosmetology School so she can work when he’s laid off in the winter. Right now she’s senior barista, cashier and table clean up, as well as Glibertarians receptionist.

    She directed me down the hall to Conference Room 3, but reminded me to use the Secret Knock. Oh, oh, I wasn’t prepared for that, but she whispers, “Shhh, middle two fingers, rap twice but firmly, wait exactly ten seconds, then flat palm the door, you’ll hear a ‘Come In’. Immediately open the door and enter.”

    Nervously, I approach the Conference Room. It had a large brass 3 on the door and below that someone has written “Janitor’s Closet” in magic marker. I use the Secret Knock, wait 10 seconds and follow it up with a flat palm. A voice from inside says, “Come in.” I try the door knob, one, two, three times, then the voice says…“Turn the knob in the other direction.” I do and the door opens. At this point I know I’ve committed a “Folks Pass” as we said in sophomore French Class.

    There is a folding leg card table in the middle of the room, four chairs, three men. I quickly survey the faces and try to put a name on each, from my observations of their comments. I recognize the more serious looking one as Leap, the good looking one as Tundra, and the happy one as Pope Jimbo. Now I approach the table and we start with the introductions. Leap stands up and offers his hand and says, “I’m Tundra.” I kiss his ring, noticing that it was the Monopoly Scottie dog. I go to Pope Jimbo, we shake, I kiss his ring which is the top hat and he says, “I’m A Leap at the Wheel, but you can call me Leap.” Now the last one, Tundra, is left and we repeat the formal introduction, his ring is the thimble, super glued in an inverted position, open end up. He says, “And I’m Pope Jimbo, but you can call me Pope or Jimbo or Mr J or Mr P but you don’t have to call me Johnson.” They all laugh.

    I start to sit down and I hear, “There are rules, Dude,” whispered from an unknown. I look up and see that sitting down first is Leap, followed by Pope Jimbo, lastly Tundra. Leap waves me into the empty chair. “We’ve been looking over your application and biography and find you’ve had a rather interesting life. The time you pushed the girl out of the way while getting on the school bus makes us believe you are a take charge kind of person.” I nodded, they were seeing things correctly. “And the time you saved your friend Bobby from walking into a puddle without probing the depth first was nothing short of heroic.” I was a little embarrassed at having to acknowledge these personal feats, but I really wanted to be accepted as a Glib.

    I looked across the room and saw a shelf with three caps, lined up like marines on parade. These were not knock-offs but genuine Glib merchandise, custom embroidered. From left to right they read:

    “Glibs Yesterday” then “Glibs Today” and lastly “Glibs Tomorrow”

    I could see a white plastic bag with a red cap in it that said “Glibs Forever” and an empty space on the shelf. I knew that would be mine if all went well today.

    Suddenly, the informalities were over and a certain aura fell over the room. Tundra announced that he had copies of the day’s agenda; I could participate in the discussion, but was not allowed to vote. He passed the agendas out and for my benefit explained the rules. There were ten subjects on the agenda that had been submitted and ranked according to their importance. Each person would have 90 seconds to discuss the implications and on to the next person. After everyone had a chance to speak, each person would get 30 seconds to summarize or rebut, then a vote would be taken. Leap would be the moderator, Tundra the time keeper because he had an official Special Olympics stopwatch with the big numbers, and Pope acting as a sort of controller, using a power point pointer (with the light on it) to signify who was in the on deck circle.

    So the discussion started. First item, how high should the wall be on the Mexican border that was being discussed nationally? A lively discussion with a lot of emotion, economics and established facts followed. I found it difficult to keep up because of the speed and coherence of the conversation.

    It was like this all afternoon, as agenda item after item was dissected and remodeled in a Glibertarian format. At one point someone mentioned MikeS’s idea/opinion and I pointed out that he was not a Minnesota Glib, but I heard the “There are rules, Dude” repeated so I dropped it.

    At the conclusion of the agenda discussion Happy Hour commenced and all formalities were dropped, everyone was relaxed, on a first name basis, like Leap, Pope and Tundra because it was hard to shorten up his name but still he didn’t seem to mind. The conversation was generally surly, sarcastic and offensive, much like the daily comments I’d come to enjoy from Glibs. Soon, however, the time had come to say goodbye. I felt I’d made an average to good impression. We all walked out together, laughing, enjoying the Glib camaraderie.

    As I got into my truck I noticed the same white plastic bag I’d seen in the conference room. Somehow the receptionist had sneaked that bag into the truck without me noticing. My heart was pounding. I opened up the bag, and there it was. A red hat with Glib embroidered on it and below that was “Forever.” I was in! Hat on, I sped out of the parking lot and was heading for home when I felt something bam-bam-bam in my back. “Uh-uh-uh” was all the sound I could make.

    “Wake up! Wake up! You were talking in your sleep again, some crazy thing about the Pope being A Sleep at the Wheel and driving on the Tundra.”

    Then it hit me, I’d been dreaming the dream of every novice Glib…

  • Allamakee County Chronicles I: Coyotes

    Note:  A preview from my upcoming autobiography, Life’s Too Short to Smoke Cheap Cigars (Or to Drink Cheap Whiskey.)

    The Critters

    The beasts in question.

    You all know what coyotes are.  Technically a small wolf and holder of the same ecological niche in North America as the golden jackal in Eurasia, Canis latrans is nowadays ubiquitous across North America, but when I was a kid back on my folks’ place on Bear Creek in Allamakee County, they weren’t nearly as common.

    Back in those days (the mid to late Seventies) in those hardwood-covered hills of northeast Iowa, we had a few bobcats around, and occasionally a bear or mountain lion would wander in from Minnesota or Wisconsin.  We once even had a small wolf pack move in to the area for part of the winter.  But coyotes were a thing of the West, of open prairies.  Our primary predators ran more to hawks, owls, raccoons, foxes, minks, skunks, weasels and the occasional feral housecat.

    Note one thing some of those critters have in common?  Some of them – raccoons, foxes and minks – had fur that was valuable in those days.  Hunting and trapping them, along with muskrat and beaver, kept me in pizzas and shotgun shells during much of my mis-spent youth.

    Mind you the wildlife picture then was different in other ways.  Wild turkeys were being slowly re-established all over the Midwest.  When I was a little tad seeing a deer was unusual enough to prompt some excitement, although by the time I was in high school they were approaching their current semi-pestilential status.

    And it was around that time that coyotes, those yellow-eyed bastards, started to establish themselves in the area.

    Their Arrival

    When coyotes came to the area around Bear Creek, they announced their presence with a serenade – sort of.

    Lots of city folks seem to think that the woods are silent at night.  Ours weren’t.  In the summer, up on the tall oaks at the top of the hills and ridges, barred owls would gibber, shriek and wail.  Evenings and early mornings whippoorwills would call from the brush, and in the spring, woodcock would peent in the edges of the meadows and do their twittering, corkscrew mating flights.  Deep in winter great horned owls and long-eared owls would issue their deep hoots from deep in the darkest parts of the forest.

    In good weather, I sometimes wouldn’t sleep indoors for weeks at a time.  In the summer I rarely came in the house at all, except maybe to grab my dinner plate to take out to the picnic table.  I often slept in the big tree house my Dad and I had built up in a big box elder hanging over the creek.  No little kid’s tree house this, but a big, enclosed, screened-in thing holding a double bed and a small end table; it was even wired for electricity.  That’s where I spent many a summer night, listening to the owls and the whippoorwills.  And that’s where I was the first time I heard a coyote howl.

    Over forty years have passed but I still remember it very well.  It was maybe an hour after sunset, and I’d been lying in the tree house, reading something or other and listening to a whippoorwill call across the creek.  That’s when I heard it, a yapping howl coming down through the woods from one of the meadows.

    The tree house.

    That first coyote song only lasted a few moments, with one coyote answering the first until down the road my brother’s old farm mutt started barking at the noise.  The coyotes fell silent, but I wasn’t the only one that had heard them.

    The next morning, I climbed down from the tree house and went inside looking for breakfast to find the Old Man at his usual morning spot at the table with his coffee.  “Did you hear the howling last night?” I asked.

    “Coyotes,” he agreed.  “They’ll be hard on the grouse and turkeys,” he predicted.

    He was right.  Wild turkeys are big enough to resist a coyote after their nest, but our ruffed grouse population started to suffer almost immediately after coyotes started moving in; the prairie wolves were hard on the ground-nesting game birds’ efforts at reproduction.  But that first morning, with the memory of that howl still fresh, my teenaged mind immediately turned to face another problem:  Come winter, how best to gather prime coyote pelts?

    The Problem of Control

    Come early winter when pelts are prime, I looked to my tools for harvesting same.  I had a pretty good string of traps and a new Marlin .22 Magnum rifle that was a real tack-driver.  Also, in the tool kit was a selection of predator calls, wood and plastic calls intended to imitate the sound of a rabbit, bird or mouse being slowly eaten alive.

    My traps were by far the more productive means.  All my efforts at predator calling over the four or five years I’d been trying it at that point had yielded precisely two gray foxes, while my trapline yielded a regular supply of muskrat and raccoon pelts, and occasionally a fox or mink.  In those days, green muskrat pelts were going for from two to four dollars, while a raccoon would net you from twenty to thirty dollars.  A prime red fox would grab you fifty bucks if it was in good shape – serious money for a fifteen-year-old country kid in the mid-Seventies.  A mink would get you that much, maybe ten more if it was a big buck with prime fur.

    One time when I was in town selling off a half-dozen or so muskrat pelts, I asked the old man who bought furs from farm kids all around how much he’d give for a coyote pelt.

    “Prime winter pelts?” he looked thoughtful for a moment.  “Not in as much demand as fox, but, oh, I suppose forty bucks or so.”

    My intentions for the local coyotes.

    That was enough to get me interested in taking coyotes.  Problem is, that would prove easier to imagine than to do.

    That first fall I took a good look at my trap string with coyotes in mind.  Most of my lot was #1 and #2 long spring and coil spring traps.  A #1 is great for muskrat and a #2 will take a raccoon or fox, but I needed a #3 for coyotes, so the next time I went to the fur buyer I sunk the money from a couple of raccoon pelts and a few muskrats into three #3 coil spring traps.  I took them home, boiled them, let them gather a little patina (traps shouldn’t be shiny) waxed them and started thinking about how to trap coyotes.

    I tried the works.  Pit sets and cubbies baited with carp from the creek or squirrel guts; trail sets, scent lures.  All I netted were raccoons.

    I tried wandering the hills with predator calls and rifle, finding good places to hide and calling.  I tried every predator call I had, every variation on a call I could think of.  I tried to make every call sound as though blood was literally dripping, but the coyotes obviously saw through that.

    In those years I didn’t yet appreciate how canny a little song-dog could be.  But while I couldn’t call coyotes with any success, some other folks in the area were learning the art.

    How It Was Done

    Spring came soon enough.

    It’s important to remember that in those years I was, probably because of some misdeed early on in my career, sentenced to serve Monday through Friday in a tedious occupation called “school.”  “School” was supposedly preparing me to be a functional adult but was mostly seriously cutting into my hunting and fishing time.

    So, it was a Saturday afternoon that found me wandering around the countryside between several of my favored fishing spots when I stopped in at the little village of Highlandville for some gasoline and a bottle of pop.

    Old Myron Petersen, who ran the general store in Highlandville, was familiar with my efforts to take coyote pelts, and so asked me how the winter’s effort had gone.

    “Nothin’,” I admitted.  “Can’t trap ‘em, can’t call ‘em.”

    Now it happened that on this afternoon, ensconced on the old bench on the decking in front of Petersen’s General Store, was an old man whose name slips my mind at this distance in time but who I do remember was a cousin of the expansive Hamill clan who owned great swathes of farmland in Winneshiek and Allamakee counties.  I noticed him paying attention to my admission of failure, and he spoke up as I started down the stairs to my truck.

    “You can’t call coyotes?” he asked.

    “Never had any luck,” I admitted.

    “Could be that you’re not doing it the right way,” the old man said.  “Using store calls?”

    “Yup.”

    “See, that’s the problem.  I’ve called in a few coyotes.  Yessir, called in a few.  Just use a big blade of grass.”

    “Bullshit,” I opined.

    “Nope.  No bullshit.  I can show you, if’n you want.”

    I looked to the west.  The sun was growing low in the sky.  Not a bad time to be set up to calling predators.  Now, in early summer, pelts wouldn’t be worth anything, but at least I figured I might learn something.  Still, I was skeptical.  “All right,” I said.  “but I don’t think you can do it.”

    “Well, boy, you want to put a bet on that?”

    We agreed on five dollars, a not-insubstantial bet in those days.  After securing Myron Petersen’s permission to walk through his timber to a big meadow at the top of the hill, I suddenly remembered that my tack-driving .22 Magnum was back at the house.

    I wasn’t completely unarmed.  Before we set out, I opened the truck’s toolbox and extracted the one firearm I had with me that day, an old replica .36 caliber ’51 Colt Navy.  I loaded the gun, belted it at my waist, and off we went.

    It took maybe half an hour to get in place.  “Set yourself down there,” the old man pointed, “just behind them raspberry brambles.  I’ll be right behind you here.”  He sat down with his back against a big oak tree on the edge of a large meadow.  What he did next was remarkable.

    After a moment’s careful study of the tall meadow grasses around him, the old man pulled off a long, broad strand.  He ran it between his work-hardened old fingers a couple of times, stretched the blade tight in between his two cupped hands, raised hands to mouth and blew.

    A piercing, awful shriek resulted.  He blew a prolonged blast, then another.

    “Now we wait a spell,” he whispered.  This was something I was familiar with; patience is essential in hunting and fishing.

    We waited maybe fifteen minutes.  I was beginning to doze when the old man let out another horrible shriek with his grass blade, startling me almost upright.

    This went on until it was growing dark.  The cardinals, always the last birds go to roost, were chirping their good-nights in the woods, when I heard the old man let out a sharp hiss.  “Look there,” he said, “over t’the right.”

    Where the tree-line curved around the big meadow to the right, a big dog coyote stood maybe a hundred yards away, eyes, ears and nose focused on our position.

    The old man let out a quiet, subdued squeak with his grass blade.

    The big dog coyote trotted maybe another thirty yards closer, all his senses focused.  I raised my head a little to get a better look; he saw the movement, tensed to run…

    …it was a long shot, but it was all the shot I was going to get.  I jumped to my feet with the speed borne of youth, yanked the old Navy .36 from its holster and loosed three booming shots at the coyote as he swapped ends and made for the horizon.  When the black-powder smoke cleared, I saw the coyote disappear into the woods, ears and tail held high, running well, unscathed.

    After the old man finally stopped laughing, he looked at me with a big grin, “Well, boy,” he demanded, “ya aint’ forgot that bet, have you?”

    I hadn’t.  I handed him a fiver; we walked back down to Petersen’s store, where old Myron and his wife Esther were sitting on the front deck awaiting the outcome.  They’d heard the shots and were amused to hear of my three clean misses.  The old man took my five dollars, bought a twelve-pack of Miller High Life from Myron, and disappeared into the dark.  I stowed the old Navy sixgun back in the toolbox, climbed into my truck and went home.  I never did kill a coyote in northeast Iowa.

    As It Stands

    Colorado has a lot of coyotes.  As I’ve grown older, pests though they can be at times, I haven’t tried hunting them.  I enjoy hearing them sing at night when I’m bumming around in the mountains (to evade suspicion I usually describe my woods-bumming as “hunting” or “fishing” to make it sound like I’m doing something worthwhile), and I find their quick-witted, adaptable presence in my stomping grounds something to be appreciated.

    I like coyotes.  They’re great survivors.  They may well be around after we’re gone.  And from my brief experience trying to hunt and trap them, I can sure see why.

  • Bias, Liberty and the Market

    Hello and welcome back to “Pie ponders”, in which Pie – that is me, for those who are new – raises questions on various topics of great importance. Today, we talk about the evil of bias.

    Talk of bias in hiring, wage gaps, and glass ceilings is all the rage these days. I will take advantage of glibertarians being a safe space and voice an opinion that would be routinely excoriated in a different environment: bias is inevitable and preventing it is no business of government, as long as no aggression is involved.

    But what about the wymminz, you ask? Make love to them if they are pretty and to someone else if they are plain, to paraphrase some shitlord from a while back, a different age it was, because no one would say such a thing in our enlightened time. But seriously, I kid, I kid… I would never say anything so crass. Well, about the women or minorities or whatever the answer is simple: a free market will penalize, although not eliminate, bias and bigotry, and will constantly create new opportunities. Beyond that, life sometimes sucks and you cannot prevent that by giving vast powers to bureaucrats.

    Something else controversial: bias is inherent in human experience. People are biased in every aspect of their life- it is called subjective preference. Business is an aspect of life like any other. As I said before, the whole economic/social liberty dichotomy complete nonsense. Human life is a continuum of many aspects and you cannot draw clear boundaries between them. But… but… it’s not fair… Well, life ain’t fair, depending on your definition of fair. Some things are unpleasant or sad or unfortunate. That is the way it is. Luck of the draw, as I mentioned in an earlier article. But whatever you view on the fairness of it all, you will not solve it by government aggression. I can tell you that much. Getting back to bias in the economic area of life, in the end it is no different than choosing who you date. You make decisions based on knowledge and personal preference. And, just like dating, it is an issue of skin in the game (and/or superglue).

     I do not avoid Russian women, Mandrake...but I do deny them my essenceLet’s say I own a property which I rent using Airbnb. That property is worth money and it is part of my wealth. It also can be damaged, reducing its value. If this happens, I lose money, so I have a direct interest of it not happening. Maybe, based on personal prejudice, I do not want to rent said Airbnb to say… hot Russian women. That is maybe unpleasant for the group of hot Russian women on a girl’s only vacation in Bucharest who really likes that apartment, but it is my right not to rent them my property. But maybe it is not that simple.  Maybe in my personal experience – based on the last 3 times I rented to a group of Russian women – Russian women get drunk and mess things up, it is my right and my decision to avoid property damage and, as such, loss of money. I will instead rent it out to that group of Mormon missionaries.  It is probably unfair to these 5 nice Russian girls who just want to see the museums and quietly read some books in the evening. It may even be true that statistically, worldwide, Mormon missionaries do more damage to Airbnb rentals then hot Russian women (based on OECD data for 2015). But, in the end, it is my apartment, my experience of damage, my preference and I choose how to best avoid issues, even if it means stereotyping.

    And while some groups had significant historical discrimination – imposed by law, custom and oftentimes both, I am sorry to say that this has nothing to do with individuals in the present. Collectivism tries to make it about groups throughout history, but collectivism is full of shit. Each makes choices based on personal experience and has nothing to do with other groups in the past. Furthermore, not unlike minimum wage, I have significant doubts anti-discrimination legislation, at this point in time, helps various groups more than it hurts. There is always a way to get around it.

    As a personal anecdote, the first time I left Romania as a kid in the 90s, I went on a trip to Italy, where it was sufficient to go into a store and be heard speaking Romanian for a shop assistant to constantly keep an eye on us, even follow us around, assuming we were there to steal. Was it unpleasant? Yes. Did it enrage my mom? Sure. But in the end, prejudice or experience, those shop keepers had a right to keep an eye on what they decided to be suspicious persons, as unpleasant as that may have been for me.

    If I have a business which I start with my work and my money, and I am the one at risk to go bankrupt, I get to choose who I hire, which customers I target, what products I make, where I source my raw materials and every other aspect about running the business. If I believe hiring a good looking employee helps my business, I will not hire someone I consider ugly. Is it unfair? Maybe. Here some people will say you should hire based on merit, and then exclude looks from the merit part. But can you do that? Not always and not in every business. In the end, the employer decides what merit is, based on the position they are hiring for. Hooters hires for different reasons than the local hardware store.

    I do not hire adults in my factories, clearly ageistBias will not go away. All people are biased, and sometimes – regardless of how often -with reason. You depend on various heuristics – stereotypes among them- in order to make decisions about unknown things and an unknowable future. Some of this bias can be simply bigotry. Thems be the breaks. But, in the end, when you take the risk of a business, no one without similar risk in it should get to tell you what to do, or who to hire. Because if the business fails, it should fail due to your decisions, not ones imposed by others with no skin in the game. And no one can tell you this or that “has nothing to do with the business”. There are a million ways a business can succeed or fail, and they are not clear or known. Hence all the failures. So the owner gets to decide what they want to do. You can avoid hiring women, if you think they work less overtime or they will inevitably leave to have children, or you are just plain misogynist; gays if you think your customers prefer heterosexuals or they make your best employee uncomfortable, or you are just plain against homosexuality; fat people, if you think they are weak-willed or more prone to miss work due to illness, or just don’t like the fatties. You and only you should get to make those judgments. Because it is your business at play.

    While a lot of the talk of various gaps can be proven wrong by looking at the actual data, it would not be a correct conclusion that there is zero bias. Bias in individual companies or people is not the same as widespread bias in every company or person. You will always have people who are prejudiced and make biased decisions due to that, people who are incompetent and make biased decisions due to that, people who have been burned before and make more or less excessively biased decisions due to that. But in a free market situation, there are inherent feed-backs that punish bad decision making, whether the bad decision taking is prejudice or incompetence or simply choosing wrong among various uncertainties.

    To give a final example, certain businesses in Romania do not hire people from poor non-EU country like say Armenia or India. This would cause fury among certain circles. But it is a simple calculation. People from these countries want to immigrate to the EU, but not really to Romania, and use Romania as a stepping stone to reach Germany or France or whatever. For a company that has hired such people, who then leave the second they find a job further west, it means the company paid them money in the initial stages when they were being trained and not that productive, and the moment they would become productive they left. This can lead to the company to prefer not hiring these people, based on a heuristic they developed from experience. Maybe some of them think Romania is the country for them, but there is little point in taking such a chance. Alternatively, there was great outrage in Romania when some unreproducible study or other showed that in Sweden, for identical CVs, the ones with Swedish names get a higher rate of interview offers compared to ones with Romanian names. But this makes a sort of sense, for a Swedish company, all other things equal, to prefer a Swedish person, at the very least they speak the language and have more predictable habits.

    No one is entitled to a certain job or a certain wage or a certain promotion, so being denied one of those things is not a business of government. Well, what about the social justice side of the issue? Well there is no social justice side of the issues, social justice has no skin in the game and also fuck social justice it is a stupid concept.

  • The Trial of CPRM – Tape One

    These are TRUE stories with the framing device as if my stories were used against me in the court of law. (Names have been changed to protect me)

  • Retirement

    We all count the time until we can retire, cut the cord, turn out the lights or whatever we call the end of a career. We think about it, make some non-binding plans and dream, dream, ’til we finally fall to sleep. Then morning comes with a WTF? How am I gonna do it? Where am I gonna do it? Will I be able to do it? When? All these unanswered questions.

    Well, maybe for some its too early to even think about such long distance planning but those of you (I’m excluding myself) in your mid-40s, 50s, and 60s will be celebrating your birthday at a restaurant and its gonna be a big 5-0 or 6-0 birthday party and damn, what happened? That was quick.

    We’ve had discussions here about what we want to do at retirement but “Awh, its too early to worry about that” That’s not a helpful attitude so I’m here to help or not. First, answer the questions in the first paragraph. Got that? You’ll be asking yourself these same questions again and again and perhaps the answers will change but that’s OK too.

    When do I want to retire? When can I retire? Where do I want to retire?

    I decided about my 45th birthday that I wanted out at 55. I started looking towards that day and what I had to do to make it happen. Where? I had grown up in the woods of Minnesota, with the fishing/hunting and liked being outdoors, I still had a few friends there, my folks were buried nearby and a brother lived about 30 miles away so that’s where I thought I wanted to be. I owned a house in Texas but really no friends other than those I worked with and the Texas heat was not something that I enjoyed. Nothing permanent was holding me in Texas.

    I was working in the Midwest, living in the Twin Cities and spending time reading the country newspapers and visiting my brother when I could. I found some property that I liked, made a low ball offer that was rejected and kept looking. Found a 40 acre spot, with a terribly run down small house and a yard full of junk that had been on the market for a couple years. Price was high but evaluating the negatives I made an offer of about 1/3 the asking price, keeping in mind those negatives. The owner countered with an offer of about ½, I suggested we split the difference, he bumped me a little and we made a deal.

    I cleaned up everything that was burnable, old buildings/sheds/fences and clothes. I spent the winter hauling van load after van load of trash, mostly metal scraps, every week end for 6 months or more. By spring the yard was cleaned and time to tackle the house. The previous owner was a Copenhagen chewing bachelor and his habits were visible. The house was a kit, 18 X 26, costing 1200 dollars plus delivery and was about 30 years old. The sidewalls were 6’4” and I was 6’5” at the time. The roof was sagging badly, hadn’t been painted since the first time 30 years early and needed a total remodel and upgrade. I kept telling Mrs Fourscore that it was beautiful, she kept checking the yellow pages for psychiatric help.

    Anyway, I got my best friend to help me, we tore the roof off, raised the walls 20” and put new trusses and plywood on. I spent the rest of the weekend shingling and I was on my way. I took a week’s vacation a few weeks later, put on siding on the newly raised walls, new windows, sliding glass door and lastly primed the outside.

    I called my boss that Sunday night, he said, “Good, ’cause I have reservations for tomorrow for you to go to Berkeley, CA, we just bought a store and you ( meaning me) need to complete the deal and stay as long as necessary.” I was there for 5 weeks, remodeling, hiring, training. Fortunately after a couple weeks a good manager arrived.

    I then spent about 4-5 months’ worth of week ends gutting and remodeling the inside of the cabin, as we called it . My wife took back some of her doubts of my skills when she stayed in there for the first time and the shower worked and the lights turned on when she threw the switch.

    So now, we have a small place to live on weekends, modern, clean and warm but not very big. And still 7-8 years away from the magic 55 year mark. For now, though, a place to use for hunting/fishing and relaxing. Still a few years from retiring at this point though. It was great, nearly every week end and vacations would find me at the cabin, relaxing. Deer season came and I had a super hunting shack with all the amenities.

    Then the years rolled on and I explained to my wife that we should build our retirement home, our property was actually in 2 parcels, easy peasey to use the second parcel. It had been an old homestead with a big field and so I chose a spot near the back edge of the field. She was not super excited but after my whining and crying she finally gave in. So I started, two years before the date set for retirement.

    I won’t go into detail about the permitting but it wasn’t fun, had to be rezoned, etc. The good part was at that time there was no requirements for inspections other than an electrical. Had to have a well and septic system permitted. I contracted the basement, I had drawn my plan on graft paper, no blue prints since I was going to be flexible.

    The missus and I had agreed on 3 premises or requirements.

    1. It had to be warm (i.e. well insulated)
    2. The kitchen had to face the east, for harmony with Asian customs
    3. Every room had to have a window, including the basement.

    I contracted the basement block work, went a course higher (13 rather than the usual 12) because I was a pretty tall guy at the time and I wanted all the duct work under the basement ceiling. At that point I started nailing stuff together, every week end, leave work early and put 2 long days in over the weekend. That went on for two years, slowly, slowly a house took shape. I always took my tools with me but left the building supplies and fortunately had no theft.

    I pretty much did everything, I contracted the roof/shingles and steel siding but learned as I went for the rest. Retirement day came, I was 55, we were ready but there were still some finishing to do inside but at least we could live there and I was closer to my project. For a couple weeks dishes were washed in the bathtub, cooking was done on a hot plate and counter top oven. Master bath was finished, carpeting was not yet installed and the basement beckoned

    I finished out the basement and its sort of a man cave. I had planned on a pool table but that space got filled with an extra refrig and freezer and now the computer. Probably took another year to wind up everything, had to build a garage and then another one.

    I made some mistakes that I wished I hadn’t made but not too many. Some things were done twice, some things never have been done.

    Besides the what and where of retirement comes the how. In any case, my opinion is that one must have one’s retirement home paid for before retirement, unless you are fortunate to have a good income. House payments, along with taxes/insurance and maintenance will eat up a lot of most people’s monthly retirement income. On the other hand, there are options available to enjoy without the burden of worrying about your abode.

     

    My wife and I are rather frugal but she does like to travel. Living in the country we don’t need a lot of ‘nice’ clothes. I got by for several years wearing out the clothes I had worked in and mostly wear jeans now. We don’t spend a lot of money at restaurants, maybe a couple lunches a month while we’re shopping. We have dinner out with friends for birthdays and anniversaries but all in all mostly we eat at home. A big garden in the summer provides therapy and fresh food. Mrs Fourscore cans and freezes a few things. We enjoy fresh fish but I can’t get her to eat venison, too bad, ’cause she can really cook. More for me is all I can say.

    Our friends are similar, old, reclusive and comfortable being left alone. We help one another, drink a little coffee and socialize fairly often, more so in nice weather as opposed to winter. It was an easier transition for us because we moved back to where I had grown up and knew a few of the families. Trying to retire in an unfamiliar rural area would have been more difficult as folks tend to leave one another alone unless there is a commonality such as a church or club. We have great neighbors, in that no one bothers anyone.

    A couple of my neighbors shoot a lot. If I don’t hear them shooting I begin to worry that something has happened.

    There has been a lot of Glib discussion about retirement. If you have your place picked out and can negotiate a good bargain think about starting your new life. If it happens to have an abandoned old house perhaps the foundation can still be used, or the well, etc. Don’t worry about the grown up brush, 2 weekends and a fire will solve a lot of problems. All that junk on the outside has kept prospective buyers away and can be used to your advantage.

    10 years pass quickly. We’ve owned this property 33 years now, been retired 27. We had to say good bye to a lot of friends over the years but way better to have had them along the way than have had to live somewhere else with out them.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The first ten years, 55 to 65, we were pretty much the same, physically. Then some tasks began to take longer, stuff got heavier, places got farther away. If you wait too long you may not be able to do those things you had planned to do when you retired. Good luck to all.

  • UnCivil’s Theories on Value

    I predict a nonzero number of people reading this will not find it enlightening or insightful. The exact verbiage involves some profanity, but I ask the forbearance of the Glibertariat.

    I frequently ruminate on why I don’t understand other people, and speculate on how they might have come to some rather bizarre conclusions. While often fruitless, it does exercise the neurons, and leave pieces of dross lying around the brain pan like this one. It seems to me how one views the world can imply a great deal about how one sees value. I think, at a basic level, there are two ways of looking at value. I’m going to dub them the Theory of Absolute Value, and the Theory of Relative Value.

    The names more or less contain all there is to know about the core of the theories. Absolute value means that if something has value, that value is the same, for everyone. It is a very easy thing to intuit, especially when you look at how a child is taught about money. “This piece of cotton and linen with ink on it is worth something. If you go to the store, you can trade it for other things.” Since that value is fairly consistent, it’s easy to infer it’s worth the same to everybody. And with prices being fairly consistent, it’s not hard to make the leap to value being intrinsic.

    In of itself this intuitive leap doesn’t harm the person’s ability to function. But when you start to draw logical conclusions from it, things begin to look different. If the value is absolute, then that value can be determined objectively, and centrally. Also, there is no such thing as a mutually beneficial trade. Either both parties break even, or one side gets cheated. But what of artisans? How does a cobbler take pieces of leather that don’t seem to have much value and make a shoe that does? Clearly this means the labor is adding something, and that labor has a value. But then that labor’s value must also be the same in all cases. So in any exchange of services, you’re going to end up with one party fleecing the other, or a grudging lack of gain on either side. From there it’s easy to look at a business and conclude that the only way it could be making a profit was if it was cheating its customers, employees, suppliers, or any combination of the three.

    But why would so many people willingly participate in a system where they’re losing out or barely breaking even most of the time? Clearly they must not have a choice. Before you know it, you’ve gone from a simple intuitive inference to chanting anti-capitalist slogans.

    Backing up to the beginning, the alternative proposition is the Theory of Relative Value. It supposes that value is not intrinsic but subjective and situational. Our cobbler may have made a fantastic shoe, but if it’s a size ten, it’s too small for my feet, so I’m not going to value it a whole lot. Likewise, those pieces of inked cotton and flax don’t themselves have value, beyond the ability to facilitate exchange. Once nothing intrinsically has value, but some measure of utility, it becomes easy to see mutually advantageous exchanges where both sides might walk away satisfied with the result.

    But if everything is relative, it is impossible to determine an objective value. Not for those shoes. Not for an undeveloped piece of land. Not even for yellow-hued, chemically resistant metal. This causes problems then for doing things centrally. And that business? Well, it’s entirely possible that it can turn a profit without cheating the customers, suppliers, or employees.

    The thing is, if your brain has wired in the Theory of Absolute Value, then the Theory of Relative Value becomes almost alien to it. This conclusion, I fear, is drawn almost entirely from my own thought processes. I passed economics, so logically I can figure out that the Theory of Relative Value more accurately reflects reality. But intuitively, I still jump to Absolute Value. The initial reaction of, “Why would anyone buy that?” betrays the old childhood pathways still in use. Because it still makes no sense why anyone pays a dime for a Jackson Pollock splatter, or Florida real estate.

  • On the Political Compass and What Truly Divides Us

    The US has never been so divided. As the armies of California march through Utah burning everything in their path, one cannot help but wonder how we got here. Wait, no, there is no civil war, just twitter arguments about muh Social Justiz. Carry on. But in that scenario, would Utah put up a good fight? Is the terrain suited for guerilla warfare? What is the difference between military equipment stationed in Utah versus California? Will parts of California join Utah against the rest? These are all questions.

    Libertarian used to mean socialist !!! They're thieves! They're thieves! They're filthy little thieves! Where is it? Where is it? They stole it from us, our precious. Curse them! WE hates them! it's ours it is, and we wants it! We wants it, we needs it. Must have the precious. They stole it from us. Sneaky little libertarianses. Wicked, tricksy, false!

    The world is similarly split. What can we do about it (get drunk and say fuck it)? Can we understand it (nope… now where is that bottle of scotch)? Maybe if we have a political test or a sociological study (ice? What am I a savage? Where is my Glencairn glass). If we analyze what divides us maybe we can heal (right… good luck with that… ahhh peat smoke)

    While annoying and right down aggravating, there is some fascination on how some otherwise competent people can so differ on the issues. It is amazing how they simply cease to use the reason and methods they do in other aspects of life, like a switch flips.  If you take a group of good plumbers or programmers or whatever, they tend to be good in relatively the same way, they often reach similar conclusions on how to do their job. These same people can have wildly different views on politics. Some ore stupid leftists, some are ignorant right-wingers, some are evil libertarians.

    Among the actions taken by the current crop of political philosophers (there’s a bunch with useful skills in the post-apocalypse) is to analyze these orientation by means of political tests or compasses which get more and more complex, but remain equally worthless beyond having something to share on Facebook on a slow night when the cats are nowhere to be seen.

    The classic left-right divide is thoroughly meaningless by now – if it ever was truly meaningful – though it still causes most divisions and even the wise Pie often uses words like left-winger and right-winger. The first wave of more advanced compasses have the already classic two dimensions economic and social, as if there truly is a distinction between the two. People are trying to innovate and add even further dimensions, although what use this has is beyond me. What point can it have to say well this on economy, this on social issues, and this in nationalism and this on the concept of colonizing Jupiter etc. It may become a way to split into finer grained groups, but brings not much insight or not much of a solution for what ails the world.

    I am sure we can do better than this shit

    For libertarians, it can be a little more straight forward. In the words of Bobby H:

    “Political tags—such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal conservative, and so forth—are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbours than the other sort.”

    The conclusion of this being, I don’t really care if someone who wants to impose his shit on me is doing it on the social or economic axis, often both. I would rather they just stop, please and thank you.

    I can myself split people into various groups: those who understand the difference between what they want and what is possible, and those that do not. The difference between the thought that they want something and the thought that they somehow should get to force that something on others. The difference between seeing a problem and knowing a solution. The difference between what is seen and what is unseen when applying a certain policy. Believing you know better than others what is good for them and realizing you, in fact, do not know better. Utopians versus sane people. All these dimensions, in a way, divide us. But probably a lot of them are rendered moot by the Heinlein principle.

    I will, as usual, randomly drop this quote right here cause it is one of my favorites.Pictured: not C. S. Lewis

    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
    — C. S. Lewis

    So what is your favorite compass? What questions would you add? Maybe we should make the Glib political compass.

    I will start with a rough draft of Pie’s political compass, which can be left at just one question or expanded, but overall I think it may be self-sufficient, like the proud libertarians.

     

    Pie will leave you be. Will you leave Pie be?

    1. Yes
    2. No
    3. Depends
    4. I don’t know
    5. Fuck off slaver
    6. That is literally hate speech
    7. As long as you don’t sin
    8. We live in a society you know, we’re all in this together
    9. But what about the children?
    10. I am Emily Ratajkowski (or equivalent) and I want to have sex with Pie
    11. STEVE SMITH LEAVE PIE BE AND BY THAT MEAN…
    12. Gravity is oppressive
    13. Other (you bunch of dirty otherers)
    14. All of the above.