¡El viernes trece enlaces mexicanos!

¡Buenos dias Gliberinos!  Feliz viernes trece, y buenos suertes con los gatos negros…..muwahahahaha…

 

The Chilean C-130 plane bound for Antarctica has been located.  Coincidentally, there are no communist dissidents among the survivors.

What?

In better news, Cuba had a disappointing year in tourism.   Apparently, few people want to visit a socialist hellhole.

The Pentagon is investigating a contract award for parts of “the wall” built by a contractor openly endorsed by the president. I’m sure its its as squeaky clean as Halliburton.

In other news, Mexicans don’t like artwork depicting revolutionary heroes as gay.

A painting showing Mexican Revolution hero Emiliano Zapata nude and in an effeminate pose has drawn the ire of some of Zapata’s descendants and led about 100 farmers to block the entrance to the building where it was on display Tuesday.

The painting depicts a nude Zapata wearing high heels and a pink, broad-brimmed hat, straddling a horse.

Zapata’s grandson said Monday the painting should be removed or descendants would sue.

“We are not going to allow this,” said Jorge Zapata Gonzalez. “For us as relatives, this denigrates the figure of our general (Zapata), depicting him as gay.”

Determine this one on your own.

Argentina follows their timeless tradition of kinda sorta providing asylum for assholes.

 

Sloopy requested today’s  music selection start with the letter M.  I did not ask why.  I did not think this was an unreasonable request, nor did I clear it with him beforehand.  So today you get the (((Reggae guy))), Matisyahu.

 

Comments

537 responses to “¡El viernes trece enlaces mexicanos!”

  1. Rebel Scum

    I assume these are late because it’s Friday the 13th.

    1. mexican sharpshooter

      No. Your on Mexican time now, bigot.

      1. Nephilium

        So the links are late because it’s viernes trece?

      2. Jarflax

        fanático

      3. Rebel Scum

        Is that like CPT?

  2. leon

    “In other news, Mexicans don’t like artwork depicting revolutionary heroes as gay.”

    What’s with artists and kicking those sleeping dogs?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Political Statement > Artistic Skill

    2. Trigger Hippie

      What’s the big deal about making him look womanly? I mean, Mexicans never seemed it care that Frida Kahlo was painted to look like a dude…wait…

    3. blackjack

      Fake news. If he was Mexican, the horse would have been a 1971 Impala and there would have been about twenty cousins in it. Nobody would have bitched about that.

      1. mexican sharpshooter

        You do understand those are Americans of Mexican descent that do that? Actual Mexicans have a GMC S15 or a original VW Beetle made in the 90s.

        1. blackjack

          With A Giant Horse Head Sticker In The Back window?

          1. SugarFree

            Or a memorial to a dead relative in peeling house address stickers.

    4. Jarflax

      To be fair “long live the shoe” sounds like a pretty gay motto.

  3. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Is that an Orthodox rapper?

    1. Pat

      He’s since abandoned his faith, but he was Orthodox at the time.

    2. Nephilium

      Well, King Django has some songs he does in Hebrew (sorry, first one I could find easily).

  4. Festus

    Aw, there can never be enough of “painty-breast Mehico Senorita” We like her the best!

    1. Festus

      *Looks gift horse in the mouth* “Took ya long enough…”

  5. Pat

    The Chilean C-130 plane bound for Antarctica has been located.

    We were decades overdue for a Chilean-airliner-crashes-in-a-glacier-and-the-survivors-eat-each-other story

    1. Fourscore

      “survivors-eat-each-other story”

      Cause or effect? Not both?

    2. Old Man With Candy

      Well, that’s tasteless.

      1. Trigger Hippie

        Nah, just a little gamey.

    3. Gustave Lytton

      “Andy’s chile”?

    4. cyto

      It was headed to antarctica. This is banned by international treaty… the UN shot it down. You can’t go there because of the ice wall that surrounds the world. This is why they made the international treaty banning going to Antarctica.

      Anyone who reads the Flat Earth Society’s web page will know all of this and this plane getting shot down will not be surprising.

  6. Tundra

    Good morning, Mexi and thanks for pitch-hitting.

    I would love to visit Cuba just as soon as that shitty government is overthrown.

    Determine this one on your own.

    Yes, it’s totally gay.

    Make it a great day, bitches. It’s Friday the 13th after all!

    Oh, and congrats to Boris. Pretty solid win.

    1. Festus

      If only it could be Canada. Bernier lost by the slimmest of margins and now that Scheer is being ousted he’s decided to go all “Libertarian” and abandon any chance of gaining power. Cunte.

    2. mexican sharpshooter

      Tundra!

      Yeah I’m looking forward to work today. We have an office on London…

      1. Tundra

        I’m curious, do you keep London Calling teed up for when you join conference calls?

        Because I would.

  7. The Late P Brooks

    The painting depicts a nude Zapata wearing high heels and a pink, broad-brimmed hat, straddling a horse.

    Shoulda gone with dreadlocks and a hoodie.

    1. Festus

      *golf clap* You beat me to it.

  8. DEG

    In a recent interview in La Paz, Eva Copa, a Mas senator, said the party needed to look to future and engage in a process of “self-criticism” over its “mistakes”.

    Oh goodie. Struggle sessions.

  9. leon

    “Another of those aboard, electrician Jacob Pizarro, 38, had lost his wife five months ago, leaving behind two children, ages 2 and 6, who are in the care of their grandmother.”

    Geez. Those poor kids.

    1. Fourscore

      Apparently they were already in the care of Grandma. Most grandmothers come with experience and love of their grandchildren, I’m holding out hope this is the case here.

      1. leon

        Well I imagine that was the case cause he was going on this trip. Still losing both parents in 5 months.

        1. Yeah, the whole thing is a tragedy but that one hit me. I can’t imagine losing both of your parents within months of each other when you’re 6 years old.

  10. The Late P Brooks

    That horse needs a single horn in the middle of its forehead.

  11. Pat

    Apparently, few people want to visit a socialist hellhole.

    Nah, it’s the Yankee embargo. If Trump hadn’t reversed Obama’s glorious detente Cuba would be like a Scandinavian social democratic paradise.

    1. WTF

      I never understood that logic. Cuba can and does trade with pretty much every other country in the world, so how does only the USA not trading with them lead to complete disaster? They’re a small country so it’s not like loss of the US market should have the same impact as it would on a huge player like China or Japan.

      1. Fourscore

        Asking for California? NY? NJ? IL?

      2. Raven Nation

        It’s another reason the US should lift the embargo: right now it’s a convenient way for the Cuban government to explain their economic problems.

        1. Agreed. If the embargo was going to do something it would have by now. At least if you open up trade and travel you’ve got a better shot at giving people who want to leave that shithole a chance to fly under the radar (maybe literally) and escape.

        2. JaimeRoberto Delecto

          That, and it hasn’t worked.

    2. Certified Public Asshat

      I think people still want to visit, for that cute/charming type of poverty.

      1. The Last American Hero

        I thought it was all just latin-jazz clubs where smokin hot 20 year olds bump and grind all night.

        You lied to me Camila Cabello!

  12. Festus

    Every time you click on that music link an incel pulls a wing off a butterfly.

    1. Jarflax

      These euphemisms get stranger and stranger.

      1. SugarFree

        These sexual euphemisms get stranger and stranger.

  13. Rebel Scum

    Justice.

    A woman in Decatur, Illinois who shot her ex in self-defense after he attacked her in her vehicle is now behind bars on $75,000 bond, while her abuser is already back out on the streets.

    According to the Herald-Review newspaper, police say the woman was defending herself when she fired the shot from her legally owned firearm, but because she doesn’t have a concealed carry license, she’s now facing a felony charge.

    “Sgt. Chris Copeland said officers were sent at 6:50 p.m. to HSHS St. Mary’s Hospital in response to the man having been shot in his right side.

    He told police the woman had shot him in front of his home in the 3800 block of East Grand Avenue, Copeland said. Police began their investigation and contacted the 29-year-old woman, who voluntarily came to the Decatur Police Department for questioning.

    Copeland said the woman had several injuries to her face from the man battering her while she was inside of her vehicle. She had a shunt in her head from a previous injury, and a blow to the head could be fatal, Copeland said.

    The woman told police she shot the man in self-defense, Copeland said. He said the woman is not facing charges for the shooting, but is facing a preliminary charge of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon for lack of a concealed carry license. She is being held in lieu of $75,000.”

    Meanwhile the woman’s attacker was given $10,000 bond on charges of domestic battery and vehicular invasion, and according to the local paper he’s already posted bond and is back out on the street. Apparently in Illinois, acting in self-defense with a gun you’re not licensed to carry is a more serious offense than beating a woman in her own car.

    1. Pat

      I’d love to sit on that jury. Of course I’d be in jail myself after I told every person within a mile of the court house about the joys of jury nullification.

      1. Fourscore

        Good thing it wasn’t an assault pistol, she’d never see daylight.

    2. DOOMco

      I think this might turn into a good court case.
      This is the one exact shit people were talking about.

      1. cyto

        Pbbbbt!

        Nobody ever uses a gun for self defense! It is known.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      It would seem that claiming she was open-carrying would be prudent.

    4. leon

      Illinois sounds like a place that hates women. Must be run by conservatives

      1. Raston Bot

        i’m no 2A lawyer in Illinois but my understanding was b/c she was outside her house she had to have a carry permit regardless of concealed or open. and with training + fees the cost is north of $400 for one of those permits. so poor people get especially fucked good and hard by these laws.

        1. Raston Bot

          $460 + 16 hours of training + 9 weeks to process

        2. so poor people get especially fucked good and hard by these laws

          Anti-gun people are often shocked when I tell them that it’s perfectly legal to own a fully-automatic machine gun, provided you pay the ATF $200, don’t have a criminal record, and the gun was registered prior to 1986. It’s the guns that are expensive because of the scarcity imposed by the whatchamacallit act that banned civilian full auto after ’86.

          The NFA was passed in response to a spate of gangland shootings using the Thompson submachine gun during Prohibition. So why’d it take nearly 60 years for an actual ban? Well, that’s because the point of the NFA wasn’t to ban full auto weapons but to impose a financial barrier to entry. They picked the $200 figure because at the time that represented an amount of money no lower-class or even middle-class person could reasonably afford. Specifically, the kinds of people who were seen as likely to spray bullets at each other without regard to bystanders, i.e. Italians, Hispanics, black people, eastern Europeans, etc., were intended to be screened out by this $200 price tag.

          Predictably, it did not shit in terms of the criminals in question, because, being criminals, they just bought the guns on the black market. This is a lesson the government and anti-gun types have never, ever learned.

    5. ChipsnSalsa

      Remember when the whoever was arguing in front of the Supreme Court about gun laws (NY state) and some justices was satisfied with the assurance that the law wouldn’t be used in “that” way?

      Exhibit A, Exhibit fucking A.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Too local

      2. WTF

        That argument just infuriates me. It doesn’t matter whether the law will be used or not used in any particular way. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED assholes!

        1. leon

          Also no DA is gonna be like: ” hey guys don’t use this law this way cause we totally pinky swore to the chief justice that we wouldn’t.”

      3. DOOMco

        Yep. And this is probably the best case to use publicly.
        I mean it’s right up there for ideal argument with “stalker ex kills woman while she waits for the permit”

        1. Tundra

          Reynolds has been publicizing this.

          For Nikki Goeser it was a day like any other … with one exception. Her husband, Ben, had only 16 hours to live. On that fateful day in Tennessee, the man she loved would be murdered by a demented and evil coward who was stalking her. In compliance with state law, Nikki had left her legal firearm locked in the car. With the help of legislatively created pistol free zones, one evil man gunned down Nikki’s husband as she was forced to look on, alone, defenseless and disarmed by an ill-conceived law designed to protect her. Read this inspiring story of courage through remorse, as one woman struggles to seek justice for the man she loves. Follow Nikki Goeser as she fights to ensure that others are never held victim to the same terrible fate.

    6. ScoobaSteve

      “the woman is not facing charges for the shooting, but is facing a preliminary charge of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon”

      Bullshit. That is the charge is for the shooting.

      “Carrying a concealed, loaded firearm without a valid permit to do so is a Class A misdemeanor for one’s first offense”

      1. Fatty Bolger

        Nice catch.

    7. Not Adahn

      The same law applies in NY.

  14. DOOMco

    At least it’s almost the weekend.
    Kids had finals all week, and we had some weird pile up of everything breaking. Flooded buildings, broken pipes.

    Yesterday, a person lost the submaster to a building.
    They just submitted a “I need a key asap to (6 different rooms)”
    This is why I’m changing the policy.

    My only link https://m.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2019/12/12/burlington-police-chief-admits-he-used-an-anonymous-twitter-account-to-taunt-a-critic

    1. Festus

      “Too local.”

        1. Festus

          j/k It was a fine link!

        2. I don’t know about lobotomies, but words can <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aGSKrC7dGcY"pierce right through you.

          1. Festus

            Do you want “men” like that playing music for your daughters?

        3. Rhywun

          “Your punishment is a link from Slate.”

          Harsh.

          1. DOOMco

            Maybe a little.

          2. Festus

            Slate used to be cool until they let contributors be hall monitors. That chick that became a guy? She backed me up numerous times when I was called a Russian Bot. Cool chick/guy whatever. The writing was on the wall when Marcotte left for even leftier pastures. We used to be able to have a conversation and after Drumph it was over, Man. Open Salon used to be alright.

    2. leon

      “The account, @WinkleWatchers, has since been deleted. Del Pozo created the profile to mock Charles Winkleman, a Burlington resident, political activist and known provocateur who regularly takes aim online at the chief, landlords and others in power. ”

      This is neighborhood spats spilling out into twitter

      1. DOOMco

        Yep. It’s hilarious. And the fact it’s being treated like the worst thing in the world makes my laugh
        I mean, from the looks of it, he wasn’t on the clock while trolling. Who cares. Why can’t he use a handle?

        1. leon

          They put the cop on leave due six weeks to seek “mental help”. Really?

          1. DOOMco

            Vermonters gonna Vermont.

    3. DOOMco

      Look at the picture of Charlie.

      It’s pajama boys cousin

    4. Spartacus

      I have a master for my building. Before they gave it to me I had to sign a form stating that I would be responsible for $9000 rekeying costs if I lose it.

      1. DOOMco

        My boss thinks I can’t actually make people sign that.

        I think if I word it to “your department” it should be ok. And the requirements for being approved for sub Masters and masters is about to get very hard here.

  15. leon

    “Bolivia’s exiled former president Evo Morales has landed in neighbouring Argentina having been granted asylum by its new leftwing leaders in a move likely to further vex Brazil’s far-right administration”

    I see all leftwing leaders are assumed to be far-left. Otherwise you’d specify that in the article too.

    1. Raston Bot

      so Mexico denied him asylum? my Bolivian friend told me he was hiding in Mexico. that’s interesting.

  16. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Whatever you say man…

    It was a “perfect” impeachment.

    They shoveled all the shit up in one big pile and were unable to pick it up or sort it out. So they just called it “Abuse of Power”. It was pretty much all-inclusive.

    Then they took all the disrespect shown the first Branch of government and the refusal of Donald Trump to cooperate with any requests for witnesses or documents and called it “Obstruction of Congress”.

    It was beautiful. It was neat and tidy. It was written in wonderful words. It was easy to read.

    There was nothing wrong with it. It was “perfect”.

    1. leon

      “They shoveled all the shit up in one big pile ….It was beautiful. It was neat and tidy.”

      Polishing turds

    2. Rebel Scum

      It was pretty much all-inclusive.

      Yeah, no need to detail any specifics when attempting to railroad someone.

      1. leon

        Everyone knows that when it comes to criminal accusations it’s best when you paint with broad strokes

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        The local libertarian-leaning talk-show guy seriously hates Trump with a passion and has been leaning on the Ukrainian quid pro quo hard. His take is that nothing else matters, Trump is guilty of using the funds to get political help and that is a crime.

        It may well be a crime, however there’s no way I’m going to evaluate this on its own merits and not in light of everything else.

        If I thought for even a second that any of the egregious crimes committed by anyone else (Biden, the FBI, the CIA, Brennan, Clapper, Obama, Clinton) were going to be pursued after Trump was convicted I would say “Sure, impeach him”

        But that is most definitely not going to happen if Trump is impeached. We will return to situation normal, where politicians are raiding the coffers and the administrative state continues unchecked.

        So they can fuck right off with the Trump impeachment. I will opt for the most chaotic outcome that brings the most of the bullshit to light, which requires his presence.

        1. Rebel Scum

          It may well be a crime

          Meh. . .

          Donald J. Trump✔
          @realDonaldTrump

          Dems Veronica Escobar and Jackson Lee purposely misquoted my call. I said I want you to do us (our Country!) a favor, not me a favor. They know that but decided to LIE in order to make a fraudulent point! Very sad.

        2. straffinrun

          When I first heard of the phone call I was, “That sounds pretty shady.” And then I found out about 2 minutes later that Hunter was getting those fat wads of cash and was, “That makes sense what Trump did in that case.”

    3. Festus

      And predestined to fail. Instead of drowning silently like most people do, the Dems have gone full Hollywood.

      1. leon

        “And predestined to fail. ”

        I don’t think the folk at DU know that.

        1. pan fried wylie

          to be fair, it’s “DU”, not “Duh!”

    4. WTF

      Of course “Obstruction of Congress” isn’t even a thing. They couldn’t show any obstruction of justice under any legal definition, so they decided to call it Obstruction of Congress so that it sounds like he did something wrong.

      1. leon

        Sure it is. Just generally the obstructionist is a congressman and getting rid of him is a parlimentary procedure.

        1. Fourscore

          “Obstruction of Congress”

          Isn’t this what voting for an incumbent’s opponent is?

          Let me see, I’d like to obstruct Congress and Candidate A says “I’ve got a pen and a phone”

          1. Festus

            It’s the sheer hyprocrisy that makes my blood boil. “Whataboutism” is just a fancied up way of saying “Shut Up”.

    5. Rufus the Monocled

      Would LOVE to see that person’s reaction if they ever were to be under investigation and that was the tactic.

      I don’t think they’d call it ‘perfect’.

  17. The Late P Brooks

    “Bolivia’s exiled former president Evo Morales has landed in neighbouring Argentina having been granted asylum by its new leftwing leaders in a move likely to further vex Brazil’s far-right administration”

    If it pisses Bolsonaro off, it’s good, I guess.

    Since I cannot be bothered to RTFA, are he Bolivians asking for him to be returned for prosecution?

    1. mexican sharpshooter

      Not that I am aware.

  18. DOOMco

    Hey I’ve been gone for a bit and playa stole my internet.
    Has Don been impeached yet?

    1. leon

      Is they why he had to escape Texas?

    2. Festus

      I’ve been told by trusted sources that the walls are closing in. In other words, “We’ll get you next time Gadget!”

  19. Rebel Scum

    Donald J. Trump✔
    @realDonaldTrump

    Congratulations to Boris Johnson on his great WIN! Britain and the United States will now be free to strike a massive new Trade Deal after BREXIT. This deal has the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative than any deal that could be made with the E.U. Celebrate Boris!

    Brussels is not going to like that.

    1. WTF

      Brussels is not going to like that.

      Which makes it even more hilariously awesome.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      It’s OK, Juncker is too drunk to notice.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          My favorite Juncker clip

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgiI46FCDU

          Of course, he now blames his stumbling around on sciatica.

          1. Festus

            My favorite is the one some rando pulled on the job-site. “I’m pre-diabetic!”

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            Yeah, and Hillary had pneumonia

          3. The Last American Hero

            -2 locked knees.

          4. Festus

            Come on now! She lost a shoe just like in The Life Of Brian. “We shall follow the Crock!”

    3. leon

      Seems like the most lucrative deal would be to unilaterally drop restrictions to trade.

      1. pan fried wylie

        Sure, but then the Wrong People might benefit.

    4. Festus

      Well fuck them sideways! They gave the world brussel sprouts and pay-back is a bitch sometimes. (Full disclosure, I like brussel sprouts!)

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        It’s brussel sprout season. I go to Whole Foods for lunch (good salad bar) and it’s covered up with brussel sprouts. Unfortunately, most of the recipes are abominable, like Mustard and Maple Brussel Sprouts.

        1. DOOMco

          It’s always brussel sprouts season.

          Kill them on sight.

        2. Festus

          Cut the ends off and sautee with pre-cooked bacon. Or boil them into mush like Grandma did and slather with cow butter. Whatever. I likes ’em!

        3. mexican sharpshooter

          All you really need is to halve, and sauté them with some salt. Add a bit of hard cheese like parmesan. Totally underrated cruciferous vegetable.

          1. Tundra

            Halve, toss with shallots, olive oil and salt. Roast in a wicked hot oven for 15 minutes, turning half way (if you care to), hit with balsamic vinegar.

            Serve.

          2. Grummun

            This guy gets it (we use garlic, not shallots, but close enough).

          3. Fourscore

            And serve. To someone else. The one that likes okra.

          4. pan fried wylie

            The exterior leaves turn into a most snackable imitation of chips.

          5. Certified Public Asshat

            I hated them growing up because all my mom would do is boil them. I can enjoy them now, but I am still weary because of the gas they cause.

          6. Festus

            It’s the complaints from others, isn’t it?

          7. A Leap at the Wheel

            Yeah, if you cook them too long they develop mustard gas or something, but if you don’t over do it they can be great.

      2. The Last American Hero

        No you don’t. You like salt and butter.

        1. Tundra

          And vitamins K and C.

          1. MikeS

            Vitamin K? Now you’re just making shit up.

          2. Jarflax

            Nah, ketamin it’s a horse tranquilizer used as a date rape drug

          3. MikeS

            Oh that vitamin K. Yeah, it’s good stuff.

            I mean for, you know, tranquilizing horses and stuff.

          4. straffinrun

            I the get those from the sunshine band.

    5. Rufus the Monocled

      Brussels will sprout with anger.

      1. Festus

        Hey Muppet! What do you think of Bernier basically taking his ball and going home? It’s like we had a chance to actually make some reforms and someone snitched to the gym teacher. I’m hoping Rempel throws her hat in the ring.

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          He already said no?

          The conservatives are a hot mess. Scheer lost the plot when he decided for some reason the way to win was to pander to Ontario-Center and then proceeded to nominate that former Liberal barely one year in the conservative party as DEPUTY-CHIEF. It was an eye popping whopper of a stupid move. It pissed me off. I hope they send her packing. I want nothing to do with anyone who had anything to do with Justin.

          He was taking the party, basically, into ‘RINO’ territory. It’s like conservative principles mean nothing.

          I’m almost certain there was some kind of revolt behind the scenes after he did that.

          Rempel is cute but not the answer. I don’t see anyone. I don’t know why they like McKay.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            I personally like the People’s Party better.

            If he could work it out….it’s a good option to the conservatives like the NDP are to the Liberals.

          2. Festus

            Oh yeah, he’s already stated that he’s not coming back. He’ll just hang out in Mom’s basement for awhile to get his bearings. I like Rempel because she speaks truth to power but she’s just too regional. The rest of them should be taken on a Chilean Antarctic flight. Peter McKay? That fucker should be stranded on White Island or as the natives prefer, Ooga Booga Big Steam Rock.

  20. Plinker762

    So I guess that Mexicans weren’t all that into “Zorro the Gay Blade”

  21. Scruffy Nerfherder
  22. Raston Bot

    Virginia had 7 more last night. that brings the 2A sanctuary total to 9-fucking-1! it would’ve been 8 but Fauquier pushed their hearing back to the 23rd and they’re voting on a becoming a “Constitutional” county, not sanctuary.. which strikes me as a big FU to Governor Northam.

    1. WTF

      I love how governor blackface said he could use the national guard to enforce his bullshit. How fucking clueless can someone be?

      1. Rebel Scum

        Sicking the military on peaceable citizens is 1) evil and 2) bad optics. Dude is a maroon.

        1. DOOMco

          3) the quickest way to kick off civil war 2: 2a boogaloo

      2. Grummun

        if it’s not Rule #1 of Leadership, it’s definitely in the single digits: “Don’t issue orders that you can reasonably predict will not be followed.”

      3. Raston Bot

        saw this point made somewhere else but the Virginia NG is mostly gun guys and no NG commander is going to want to court-martial half of his command when they say FU to the Governor.

        1. leon

          I was curious at what units are in the VA NG:

          Wiki:

          The Virginia Army National Guard is composed of approximately 7500 soldiers and maintains 46 armories in communities throughout the Commonwealth

          It looks like the 29th ID is headquartered there, but only a few battalions are actually part of the VA Guard (the others are spread out across other states).

      4. OBJ FRANKELSON

        I wonder if he knows that the Venn diagram circle of National Guard members is nearly engulfed by the circle representing gun owners affected by this nonsense?

  23. The Late P Brooks

    Trump’s America, man. What a shithole.

    The National Labor Relations Board has ruled in McDonald’s favor in a long-running case filed by 20 workers who were fired or faced retaliation for trying to unionize.

    The board said Thursday that it favors a settlement that will require McDonald’s franchisees to pay $171,636 to the affected workers. The franchisees must also notify current and former employees about the settlement and set up a $250,000 fund to handle future claims.

    The workers were seeking a ruling that would consider McDonald’s a “joint employer” with its franchisees. That would have increased the company’s liability and potentially have made it easier for McDonald’s 850,000 U.S. workers to form a union.

    But Chicago-based McDonald’s insists it doesn’t directly employ the workers. About 95% of its 14,000 U.S. restaurants are owned by franchisees.

    An administrative law judge with the labor board rejected the proposed settlement in July 2018, saying it was unlikely to end the dispute and didn’t require McDonald’s to enforce the settlement.

    McDonald’s appealed to the full board, which agreed with the company. The case will now return to the administrative law judge, who has been directed by the board to approve the settlement.

    Keeping the workers down. Stealing their labor.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That would have blown up the entire franchising business model.

      1. Festus

        In my line of work there are lots of “gentleman’s agreements” just for this reason. The job gets done, company pays and the Union is none the wiser. Fuck those assholes. Fuck them STEVE SMITH style.

      2. Rufus the Monocled

        Instead of starting something up themselves, they’d rather burn it to the ground if they don’t get ‘their cut’.

        1. Festus

          Envy is a helluva drug.

    2. Rhywun

      The workers get a big paycheck? Sounds like they won to me.

      But I want to see the workers unionize. Half of them lose their jobs and a Big Mac costs $12 now. The franchises are closed within a week.

  24. Rebel Scum

    Taking them down lock, stock and barrel.

    As House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) was fighting back against the Democrats effort to impeach President Donald Trump, claiming he abused his power and obstructed, Scalise blasted Democrats, specifically House Intel Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA), claiming it was really the Democrats who were abusing their power.

    Scalise ripped the impeachment report which contained the calls of people including Rep. Devin Nunes (D-CA), investigative journalist John Solomon, presidential lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow, Fox News host Sean Hannity, Lev Parnas, National Security Council aide and former Nunes staffer Kash Patel and lawyer Victoria Toensing, according to the Washington Examiner.

    1. leon

      Look sometimes you gotta cut down there laws to get at the devil.

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      If Scalise played dirty like they do he’d bring up the shooting.

  25. The Late P Brooks

    The woman told police she shot the man in self-defense, Copeland said. He said the woman is not facing charges for the shooting, but is facing a preliminary charge of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon for lack of a concealed carry license. She is being held in lieu of $75,000.”

    She should have called Shannon Watts for help. That’s what a civilized per4son would do.

  26. gbob

    First they come for your guns. Then your penis.

    According to a local Spanish publication based in The Canary Islands, Canarias7, Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) councilor for Puerto del Rosario town hall, Aurelia Vera, told her classroom that “boys need to be castrated at birth.”
    In one of her classes, the Spanish language teacher and local councilor said to her classroom full of male teenagers aged 14-16,“if they cut your penises off, nothing will happen to you.”

    She continued, “in order to prevent men from governing and hand over the power to us women–will you do it voluntarily? No. We’ve got to dabble in selective castration.”

    Vera explains “if you cut your son’s balls off at birth, not only won’t they be able to have children, but they won’t go through a series of hormonal changes, giving them physical strength. The gonads is where they derive strength. The other thing is that their voices remain childlike.”

    It would explain modern socialist men.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That makes me reconsider the NAP.

      1. Jarflax

        Defense of the innocent is not aggression.

    2. Rebel Scum

      According to a local Spanish publication based in The Canary Islands, Canarias7, Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) councilor for Puerto del Rosario town hall, Aurelia Vera, told her classroom that “boys need to be castrated at birth.”

      That sounds oddly familiar. . .

      they won’t go through a series of hormonal changes, giving them physical strength.

      She wants men to be weak.

      She went on to recognize the difficulty in implementing such a permanent policy and that it would be met by staunch resistance if attempted on adult males–given the male physical and emotional attachment to their reproductive organs.

      Strange that someone would be attached to pieces their anatomy. This woman is evil.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        I think a forced hysterectomy is in order.

        1. Nephilium

          No FGM is still wrong. We just need all the young boys to identify as girls to avoid the procedure.

        2. R C Dean

          Hysterectomy =/= FGM.

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      How can this possibly garner any kind of support from normal women who give birth to sons?

      This is violent aggression she’s advocating.

      It’s amazing that despite all the screams of ‘that’s not real socialism’ one common thread we consistently see is their love and fetish for violence of all sorts.

    4. ChipsnSalsa

      The gonads is where they derive strength.

      One slap of the ass and a man sucks the strength from the women and stores it in his gonads.

      1. pan fried wylie

        All she has to do is suck it back out. Problem solved.

        Stupid Women.

    5. AlmightyJB

      Totally not woke. Gender is a social construct that has nothing to do with ones anatomy. A man without a penis is just as strong as one with a penis, just like a women with a penis still has a period.

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        The penis is evil, it shoots the seeds of life. HAIL ZARDOZ!

      2. JD is Unemployed

        The obstetrician was quoted as saying, “I’m sorry, based on previous surgeries it would be far too dangerous to give you a C-section. You’re going to have to push the baby out of your neo-urethra, then we can reconstruct your exploded neo-micropenis and what remains of your lower abdomen once you have recovered from the birth”, which was nice. Under his breath, he added, “It would have been a lot easier had you not decided to get pregnant before having the transition”.

        1. Festus

          This should have been an an episode of Fawlty Towers.

  27. AlmightyJB

    If there’s anything the Pentagon hates, it’s waste and corruption.

  28. The Late P Brooks

    It’s always brussel sprouts season.

    Kill them on sight.

    I approve this message.

    1. AlmightyJB

      Cut in half, coat with olive oil, salt, pepper, onion and garlic powder, paprika, cayenne. Roast in oven until crispy. Finish with a drizzrl of good extra virgin.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        AlmightyJB knows.

        I don’t add the red stuff myself and use fresh garlic (roast ’em brown and crispy too!) but I’m sure it’s good.

        I sometimes add lime and balsamic to the oil.

      2. The Last American Hero

        Another person who doesn’t like sprouts. You just want a vehicle for your seasonings.

        1. AlmightyJB

          Both can be true. I like rice even though it’s basically a butter delivery vehicle. The caramelized, crispy brussel sprouts bring something to the table.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            By the way, add (real) bacon bits to it.

          2. AlmightyJB

            Nice. I always cook extra bacon to have on hand:) just did so this morning actually.

          3. AlmightyJB

            This recipe is recreated from Asheville NC Wicked Weeds Brussel Sprouts with bacon dish which I have had and it is damn good.

            https://www.keyingredient.com/recipes/1632315037/caramelized-brussel-sprouts-with-bacon/

          4. Rufus the Monocled

            Hm. Will try it. Thanks.

          5. AlmightyJB

            Cool. I’ve had Wicked Weeds but have not tried this recipe yet.

    2. Rhywun

      #metoo ?

    3. Shirley Knott

      Brussels Sprouts aren’t food, they’re what food eats.

  29. gbob

    Here’s an idea. Don’t put fucking cameras in your child’s room.

    Video showing a hacker talking to a young girl in her bedroom via her family’s Ring camera has been shared on social media amid warnings people need to secure the devices better.

    The hacker tells the young girl: “It’s Santa. It’s your best friend.”

    Technology website Motherboard reported online forums used by hackers were offering software making it easier to break into such devices.

    Ring owner Amazon said the incident was not related to a security breach.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The kid is 8 years old, which makes it even weirder.

    2. Pat

      Here’s an even better idea: don’t put cameras or microphones anywhere in your house. Assume that every piece of new technology is being used for nefarious purposes, because it is. Act accordingly.

      1. Sean

        Act accordingly.

        Furiously masturbate while wearing a Harvey Weinstein mask?

        1. Pat

          There are two kinds of people

          1. Desk Jockey

            Nobody cared who I was until I put on the mask

        2. Weirdly, I read that as “fart accordingly.”

      2. JaimeRoberto Delecto

        Like your mobile phone?

        1. Pat

          Exactly.

  30. AlmightyJB

    LA cops find out that their body cams shut off on a two minute delay. Too late for one cop. That’s cold man.

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/lapd-officer-charged-arrested-fondling-dead-woman-david-rojas

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Well, now we’ll know why the cops wait in their vehicle for two minutes before approaching your car.

      1. WTF

        “It just happened to malfunction!”

    2. leon

      Look of cops cant get to second base on the occasional dead person, then they won’t feel like the mayor will have their back to solve crimes.

    3. Plinker762

      W

    4. The Last American Hero

      Did he steal her power or does that go away at death?

    5. Shpip

      C’mon, who hasn’t had the urge to grab a cold one after work?

      1. pan fried wylie

        Her Milkshake brings all the boys in blue to the yard?

  31. JD is Unemployed

    A somewhat amusing pitch for a new Netflix series over at NR; Woke Hand for the Heartland.

    1. AlmightyJB

      It sounds pretty stupid though. Is it going to be another Borat where they try to make nice people look like assholes?

      1. JD is Unemployed

        Oh dear Lord I thought it was just a parody piece. Help.

        1. JD is Unemployed

          No I think I’m sure it’s just a parody.

          *calms down*

          ps – you’re right about Borat – about as funny as licking dog turd off a shoe.

          1. AlmightyJB

            I honestly just can’t tell anymore. The Derp is so entrenched.

          2. JD is Unemployed

            I don’t think it’s that far-fetched to consider this becoming a reality at some point soon.

    2. Rebel Scum

      With humor — and just a touch of righteous anger — the Furious Five teach lessons about pronoun preference, cultural appropriation, gender inclusion, late-stage capitalism, unconscious bias, and climate change.

      You can fuck all the way off with that shit.

  32. Raston Bot

    good interview with SpikedOnline’s editor about Boris Johnson’s trouncing of Corbyn’s Labour party.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-waxdNdRHQ

    1. AlmightyJB

      Yeah, he nails it. If the Democrat party here continues to push the Corbyn type pc, commie, wokeness agenda, their going to get the same results he did. Hopefully it doesn’t take as long.

      1. Raston Bot

        Labour is no longer the party of labor. it’s the party of college-educated woke identitarians.

        1. AlmightyJB

          I liked it better when the sanctimonious college crowd were just open Marxist. Now they just couch their Marxism in identity politics. Same oppressors that must be overthrown because racism instead of classism.

    2. PieInTheSky

      This just means Labor needs to go harder left

    3. Rhywun

      I can’t believe Corbyn got as many votes as he did. That guy was a true danger.

      1. Rhywun

        (ie. Labour MPs… you know what I mean)

    4. Raven Nation

      The SNP votes are interesting. I wonder if people there were expecting Boris to win, get Brexit done, so they’re leaning to independence.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        If it’s not Scottish socialism it’s crap!

        How about Atalanta, eh?

        1. Raven Nation

          Yeah, that was impressive.

    5. ttyrant

      I follow a handful of UK soccer journalists on Twitter who are uniformly Labour leaning. There seems to be a ton of in-fighting going on right now. Possibly another case of the left eating their own, although I’ll be interested to see if the same fracturing takes place here if Trump wins next year.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        Don’t the vast majority of sports journalists and personalities vote left as a whole? As if ESPN hasn’t proven this already.

  33. The Late P Brooks

    I did not read any of the articles, but apparently Public Enemy Number One has put another card carrying member of the Nazi Party on the Ninth Circuit Court. Prepare for our freedoms to be rolled back. Our rights are in peril.

  34. PieInTheSky

    Lord Buckethead defeats Count Binface then gives him the double finger. Gotta love this country ..

    https://twitter.com/nickdixoncomic/status/1205335909979295745

    1. PieInTheSky

      I like that even in the official speech video there’s a loony in the background

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E19aofzMHKQ

      1. leon

        It’s a good thing we got rid of the English way back, cause now-a-days i think any American would vote for anyone with an English accent, just cause they sound like they know what they are doing.

        1. JD is Unemployed

          Does that offset the expectation that they are a Hollywood bad guy? He’s a supervillain, but he knows what he’s doing.

          1. JD is Unemployed

            ps – five minutes into a conversation, Americans realise I am British and then tell me I have “no accent”. I thought you yanks could spot an Englishman at fifty paces?

          2. Nephilium

            Only if you’re smiling… 🙂

          3. JD is Unemployed

            Zing!

            *excuses self to brush tooths and practice smiling in the mirror*

        2. Nephilium

          No, I think it still has to be the “right” English accent. Have some cockney speaking limey roll in, and most people wouldn’t understand a damn thing he’s saying.

          1. JD is Unemployed

            Aiasuf, iuwhdf djhsdjfh jkfhshaw! Ehdf389 and sdf%8*”erf54. Bloody Amer234ns.

    2. PieInTheSky

      This General Election was advisory.

      I demand a People’s General Election.

      https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1205256289816895490

      1. Raven Nation

        Self-describes as “selfless and brave.” Ahh, the humility of the young.

        1. JD is Unemployed

          Psst – it’s a parody account run by a Sp!ked contributor Andrew Doyle. His identity was secret for a while and it was fun trying to guess who it was, apparently. It’s so hard to tell parody from the real thing.

          1. Raven Nation

            Ahh, thank you. It crossed my mind that it could be parody but it was not obvious.

    1. DOOMco

      So when are they shooting the next mortal kombat

      1. Pat

        Chun-Li is from Street Fighter you uncultured swine.

        1. DOOMco

          Well I wasn’t commenting on the current cosplay!

        1. Tundra

          I appreciate the obvious effort, but I’ll politely decline to ogle.

          1. Tres Cool

            Once, I heard Jason Ellis on his radio show talking about banging Chynna the wrassler. He said something to the effect of “I felt her back and shoulders, and it got weird. It was like I was fuckin a dude.”

        2. So, this is the issue I have with all lady bodybuilders and also why I think male bodybuilders look weird and gross and like “fake strong”: she’s probably packing something like 3% body fat. Once you get below 15% you start looking excessively veiny. Once you get below 10% you look like a medical emergency.

    2. AlmightyJB

      Optimizing brain damage, although I think Twitter does that more than anything. Watch the beginning, but make sure to at least go to 8:45 and watch for the best part.

      https://youtu.be/NuXhhkwldEI

      1. PieInTheSky

        ah sexy cyborg… ugly fake tits and no ass

        1. JD is Unemployed

          “Hey, I’m not a cyborg, and I got these fake tits in ‘Nam.”

      2. No conceivable scenario in which I woodn’t. To use an ancient Internet saying, “like the fist of an angry god”.

  35. PieInTheSky

    Just learned that among libertarians, the insult “watermelon” is sometimes used. In the sense of “green on the outside, red on the inside” !

    https://twitter.com/ZachWeiner/status/1205245345678217217

    The SMBC guy may not be all that bright

    I am still sort of curious about his open borders book but I aint paying for that

    1. JD is Unemployed

      Short bus material.

    2. A Leap at the Wheel

      I learned about it 30 years ago as a joke that green-on-the-outside-red-on-the-inside hippies used among themselves… and I think it was around for a long time before that.

      1. Gdragon

        I think I learned it when Penn and Teller mentioned it on “Bullshit!” but like you said my understanding is that’s it’s been around for a while.

  36. Festus

    The CBC is caterwauling about the British election. I can’t help myself, these prog tears are like Oxy to me.

    1. PieInTheSky

      The conservatives got Workington and this seems to carry some symbolism. Also Blyth Valley or some shit.

      1. Festus

        Probably Commie strongholds. I can’t be arsed to look it up. Boris is no Maggie, though. It’s best not to fly that flag just yet.

        1. Rhywun

          I recall hearing last night that Blyth Valley had been Labour since the 50s.

          And you are correct about Boris.

          1. Juvenile Bluster

            Blyth Valley was created as a district in 1950. It had never before not gone Labour.

      2. JD is Unemployed

        Labour lost the support of much of the old school commie strongholds around ex-mining villages and ex-industrial towns in the North. Apparently the old school commies, by and large, don’t care much for the wokeness or the immigrants. That’s a big ol’ generalisation, but a lot of them felt abandoned by the champagne Marxism and intersectionality squared vanguard that has taken over much of Labour’s agenda.

        1. Festus

          So The “English-English” don’t care for rape gangs. Who knew?

    2. OBJ FRANKELSON

      I hope you all went long on British salt, there will be boom in the coming weeks.

      1. Festus

        I grew up half raised by British ex-pats. They have an inordinate love of pets and will always stand up for the underdog. Hope springs eternal!

  37. The Late P Brooks

    Unqualified

    The Senate confirmed President Trump’s 50th circuit court nominee on Wednesday despite the pick being rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Association (ABA).

    Senators voted 51-44 to approve Lawrence VanDyke’s nomination to be an appeals judge on the 9th Circuit. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) joined Democrats in opposing his nomination.

    VanDyke grabbed headlines in October when he started crying during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The emotional moment came when he was asked about concerns that the ABA brought forth about his treatment of LGBT people.

    ——-

    The ABA rated VanDyke, a former solicitor general in both Nevada and Montana, as “not qualified” following an investigation that included interviews with 60 individuals.

    “Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments are offset by the assessments of interviewees that Mr. VanDyke is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to- day practice including procedural rules,” the group wrote in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    “There was a theme that the nominee lacks humility, has an ‘entitlement’ temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not always have a commitment to being candid and truthful,” the ABA standing committee continued, noting that some interviewees “raised concerns about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community.”

    Constitution be damned, what about the ladyboys?

    1. Festus

      A bunch of late birthday presents! Goes down like a hot cup of cocoa while I lecture my parents about skyrocketing health insurance rates. The toes in my footies are oh so warm and cozy!

    2. Rebel Scum

      concerns about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair

      Who needs that law when you have fairness?

    3. Rhywun

      Republican senators, during the committee hearing, dismissed the ABA’s rating as a partisan attack because a member of the group’s standing committee responsible for the 9th Circuit donated to one of VanDyke’s political opponents.

      Would be nice to see some examples of the nominee’s wickedness which might dispel the appearance of a partisan hack job the Dems seem to be pulling.

    4. R C Dean

      the assessments of interviewees

      Who were the interviewees? Why do I suspect they are “anonymous”?

      1. kbolino

        The ABA has been skinsuited*. They played a one-sided game in assessing this nominee’s “qualifications”: they appointed someone with clear bias to conduct the interviews, ignored their own rules designed to counterbalance such conflicts of interest, and then ignored or downplayed every interviewee who spoke positively about the nominee. The “not qualified” rating is a joke, albeit not a very funny one, since it was rendered without any real consideration.

        * = Can you really skinsuit an organization whose founding mission was to cozy up to government? As it turns out, yes apparently you can.

  38. PieInTheSky

    Lesbian mating rituals are beautiful

    https://twitter.com/klara_sjo/status/1205213816373432320

    1. Pat

      Ain’t no laws when you’re drinking Claws

    2. JD is Unemployed

      Well I’m going to watch that many times and bookmark it for the “what you missed while you were at sea” package for my Navy buddy.

  39. Tundra

    I can’t be arsed to research it, but does anyone know what the mechanics of Brexit are? Can it happen immediately now?

    1. PieInTheSky

      It already happened. Also the brits took back Normandy

      1. Festus

        “On to Paris!”

        1. leon

          Why would you want to ruin your country by putting a bunch of Parisians in it?

          1. Festus

            Sure. Next thing you’re gonna tell me is that Montreal strippers aren’t the best on the continent.

          2. We’re not saying BEAM’s an alien, but . . .

            Why would you want to ruin your country by putting a bunch of Parisians in it?

            Oddly enough, that’s what my French cousins actually think about Parisians.

    2. straffinrun

      I don’t think so. If I’m not mistaken, they can now start the preliminary negotiations to establish a formal introductory exploratory committee which will recommend further negotiations whereby the conditions of the initial….

      Something like that.

      1. robc

        Boris is guaranteeing it will be complete by Jan 31.

        1. straffinrun

          Hopefully. I was just pointing out how absurd it is to deal with the EU.

        2. Rhywun

          I hope for their sake they don’t ram through that last shitty deal he came up with.

          1. We’re not saying BEAM’s an alien, but . . .

            I don’t think they need to negotiate some shitty deal. With a majority, he’s pretty much able to simply tell the EU to go fuck themselves if that’s what’ll work best. I kinda hope he does.

          2. OBJ FRANKELSON

            Perhaps Boris will leverage his clear mandate and renegotiate. Now that he has the quisling Parliment off his back, he might be able to credibly threaten a no deal exit, he might be able to get more favorable (or favourable) terms from the EU.

  40. The Late P Brooks

    VanDyke garnered widespread, fierce opposition from Democrats and civil rights groups.

    Neither of his home-state senators, Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) nor Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), returned their blue slips on the nomination. A blue slip is a sheet of paper that indicates if a home-state senator supports a nominee. Republicans made history by confirming the first circuit judge nominees who did not receive a blue slip from either home-state senator.

    “Mr. VanDyke’s temperament and integrity have been called into question by his colleagues and the American Bar Association, which rated him ‘not qualified’ for the federal bench. And Mr. VanDyke’s record … is far outside the mainstream,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said VanDyke is “unqualified even in comparison to some of the worst nominees we’ve seen under this administration.”

    “Please reject this nominee. He is so unqualified. He’s a low human being, at least according to all of this, and he’ll have a lifetime appointment on a circuit bench?” Schumer added.

    A fiend in human form.

    1. Rebel Scum

      They keep using the word “unqualified”. I remember them using it on DeVos except no detailed a reason why.

      1. Pat

        I mean it says right in the constitution that all federal judicial appointees shall be from Yale or Harvard.

    2. leon

      Republicans made history by confirming the first circuit judge nominees who did not receive a blue slip from either home-state senator.

      Interesting. Where past presidents only nominating from friendly states? This seems like such an odd tradition, but maybe it boosts the egos of those Senators, which is the most important thing.

      1. Nephilium

        IIRC, it was considered a courtesy thing. If you didn’t get a blue slip, the president would withdraw the nomination. Trump has ignored this tradition, which I approve of. Maybe it’ll bring some sanity to the 9th circuit.

        1. R C Dean

          It was a courtesy until it began being abused. Trump, uniquely among Republicans, doesn’t adhere to traditions after they have been weaponized.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        I remember something about Special K trying to use her blue slip on David Stras’ nomination to get some favors in return. Then Franken went off the rails and refused to give his blue slip and the GOP grew some balls and got rid of the tradition.

        So I think it was just a way for Senators to extract some favors.

        Sources have said the White House at one point floated the possibility of nominating a candidate recommended by Klobuchar and Franken in exchange for their blessing for a Senate hearing for Stras, who has been described as a priority for the administration.

    3. Juvenile Bluster

      Nobody, not even in the ABA in their statement, said he was unqualified. The “temperment” thing was from statements by a minority of people who knew him, and the ABA didn’t follow their own rules in making that determination.

      1. kbolino

        … I really need to remember that P. Brooks can move a thread to just about anywhere.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Van Dyke was nominated to the Court of Appeals which extends beyond a single state.

      And ABA ratings are so political as to be meaningless

  41. leon

    This is where i lean much more anarchist. I get that seeking advice from a group that knows about what is going on is a good idea. But when you put so much power in the senate, and then say “Well if they aren’t rated qualified by this one group then we will skip them” your creating an environment where the senate is just abdicating the power to the ABA.

    In other words, i’m sure that the left would not be happy if the Senate started taking only recommendations from the Federalist Society or IJ when approving nominations for the courts.

    1. Rhywun

      My first thought was them using the SPLC as an “unbiased” arbiter.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      the senate is just abdicating the power to the ABA

      Nothing makes a Congresscritter happier than ridding themselves of responsibility for a decision.

  42. Not Adahn

    Wilson-Raybould said she invited Algonquin Elder Claudette Commanda to bless the offices after her swearing-in following the October election. She said she had received no “formal notice” at that point that she was required to move out, adding she got the notice on Dec. 5.

    “They are trying to,” Wilson-Raybould told CBC News when asked whether Commons administration was trying to move her out of the offices. “But my amazing elder Commanda came and cleansed my office. So I’m hopeful they’ll see the appropriate thing to let me stay in my office.”

    Injun First Nation’s ceremonies not only override no smoking ordinances, they can prevent you from being evicted in Ottawa. Who knew?

  43. Pope Jimbo

    Oh, Minneapolis School District never change!

    A year ago they had a $33M shortfall. This year they have another $20M shortfall. The #1 cause of the shortfall? Declining enrollment. What didn’t happen after the $33M shortfall? Firing teachers, administrators and other staff.

    What is missing from this year’s shortfall? Plans for firing.

    And no where in the story does any journalo ask anyone in the district, why with declining enrollment, the first thing you do isn’t reduce staff. After all why would you need the same number of employees to serve less students? (And declining enrollment isn’t a one year blip. It has been trending down for a decade)

    District officials are blaming the state and federal governments for not spending enough on local public schools.

    Minneapolis Superintendent Ed Graff noted at a district finance committee meeting last month that his district has been forced to spend $57 million on special education services and up to $12 million to help serve English language learners, costs he says the state and federal government should be paying more for.

    Meanwhile, the district is also getting pinched by charter schools that are siphoning away students and the state aid that follows them. A Star Tribune analysis of enrollment data found that about a third of Minneapolis school-age kids opt for charter schools or schools in neighboring districts. The amount of money the district paid to charter schools to educate Minneapolis students rose from $8 million in 2012-13 to $15 million in the 2018-19 school year.

    Diop said he cannot prevent a budget gap if the district keeps losing students and overspending. As of Oct. 1, preliminary enrollment data shows that enrollment in Minneapolis Public Schools was at 33,380, the lowest number in years.

    1. A Leap at the Wheel

      Charter. Schools.

      1. Tundra

        De.La.Salle.

    2. Fourscore

      Mpls needs to raise property taxes.

  44. Certified Public Asshat

    My favorite thing about election night twitter is learning how people voting spells the death of democracy— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) December 13, 2019

    Well said.

    1. Pat

      I have no idea how that guy hasn’t been excommunicated yet.

  45. Rebel Scum

    Bill Weld is the gift that keeps on giving.

    Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld (R) said Thursday that as many as a half-dozen GOP senators are privately in favor of voting to convict President Trump at a likely impeachment trial.

    “I know most of the senior Republicans in the Senate,” Weld, a long-shot candidate for the GOP presidential nomination, said in an interview at The Hill’s offices in Washington. “They’re picking their words carefully when they talk to me, of all people, even though we are friends.”

    “I wouldn’t want to get quoted,” he added. “I don’t even like to ask someone to do something which is not in their political self-interest. But yeah, I would say they’re four to six votes for removal right now.”

    Weld added that House Republicans who remain steadfast in their defense of the president will come to “regret” their decision to vote against impeachment.

    1. straffinrun

      Leave it to Weld to jump on the “anonymous source” trend about a year too late.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I can believe that Weld knows 4 to 6 Republican senators with their hands in the foreign aid cookie jar.

    3. CPRM

      Libertarian 4 Life! How can you not trust a man that honest?

    4. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      On the plus side, “the original libertarian” is not mouthing off about how gun control and climate taxes are the small government solution to something something nonsense Koch cash

    5. ChipsnSalsa

      “I know most of the senior Republicans in the Senate,” Weld, a long-shot candidate for the GOP presidential nomination, said in an interview at The Hill’s offices in Washington. “They’re picking their words carefully when they talk to me, of all people, even though we are friends.”

      Because your a blabber mouth back-stabber. I’m surprised they even pick up the phone to talk.

    6. Describing him as a “long-shot” is being charitable. This guy is a washed-up clown. I’ve got a better shot at the GOP nomination than he does. Christ knows I’ve got more dignity and certainly more self-respect.

  46. The Late P Brooks

    Trust us, it’ll work

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to spend trillions of dollars on education, child care, green energy and health care. She argues that these proposals will supercharge the economy, boosting growth and wages. And she plans to pay for it all with a bevy of taxes on the wealthy, Wall Street and corporations.
    Most of her assertions are backed by an all-star panel of experts, including Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, and leading inequality and tax specialists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman of University of California, Berkeley.
    But a growing chorus of other authorities — including former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers — are voicing doubts about the impact of Warren’s proposals, including how much her spending initiatives would cost, how much her tax plans would raise and what effect they would have on the economy.

    ——-

    Warren’s campaign, however, argues that Penn Wharton’s analysis does not take into account the economy-juicing measures in her universal child care and education proposals.
    They point to an analysis by Zandi, who argues that Warren’s child care plan “quickly lifts economic growth” because of the financial support provided to lower-income and middle-class families, who would in turn have more money to spend and be able to work more. Plus, Warren calls for raising the wages of child care workers and expanding their ranks.

    You don’t ask questions about what makes the perpetual motion machine work. It’s just not polite.

    1. Rebel Scum

      and corporations

      Which will be a cost immediately transferred to customers.

    2. leon

      What’s the difference between a Mathematician and Economist?

      You ask the mathematician what 2 + 2 is and he’ll say 4.

      Ask the Economist and he will close the doors, shut the blinds, lean over and whisper: “What do you want it to equal?”

    3. Rhywun

      who would in turn have more money to spend and be able to work more less

      Fixed to reflect reality.

    4. kbolino

      she plans to pay for it all with a bevy of taxes on the wealthy

      And, for this to work, “wealthy” will be defined as anyone with a positive net worth and/or less than $50,000 in student loan debt.

  47. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

    Did anyone see these poll numbers after the British elections? Ominous

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELmwYgcU8AEwR7x.jpg

    1. Pat

      Please clap

  48. Juvenile Bluster

    Still celebrating the UK election results.

    You know how terrible Corbyn had to be to get me this excited about Boris fucking Johnson?

    1. straffinrun

      I really don’t know why Labour got trounced so badly. Sure, Corbyn was POS anti semite, they offered crazy policies etc, but it’s still 2019 UK.

      1. Juvenile Bluster

        Brexit and the fact that Corbyn was HISTORICALLY unpopular. Like he made Hillary look like Obama. He had a negative approval rating in his own party even!

        1. straffinrun

          The Brexit referendum happened about half a year before Trump’s win. It’ll be interesting to see if any similar pattern emerges this time around.

      2. Suthenboy

        A large part of the Brit population are reasonable but relatively silent. All of the crazy crazy we hear about is the govt and their useful idiots. I would guess half of the population would move to the US in the blink of an eye so they can get on with their lives and be left alone.

        1. Juvenile Bluster

          This is also true in the US (which is why I still think that Biden will walk to the nomination)

          1. straffinrun

            Walk? You crazy. He’s gonna sprint on the convention stage, shadow box corn pop and then crank out 500 push ups.

          2. Rhywun

            I hope there’s an ambulance waiting off-stage.

        2. R C Dean

          A large part of the Brit population are reasonable but relatively silent.

          True, within the current Overton window, which includes thought policing and the NHS as mainstream “reasonable” things.

          1. straffinrun

            I know quite a few Brits, granted ex pats are a bit odd anyways, but they are all big government idiots. I call them friends, but they’re are idiots when it comes to politics.

          2. kbolino

            Yeah, I wouldn’t get too overjoyed at this. Labour may be really shitty, but the British political spectrum runs the gamut from “nationalize all the things” (Labour) to “raise taxes and spending, but stay in the EU” (Lib Dems) to “raise taxes and spending a little, but leave the EU” (Conservatives) to “raise taxes across Britian and spending in my region” (DUP, SNP, etc.).

          3. Jarflax

            On the other hand if this shifts the Overton window back toward the right even a little bit that is a good thing. The left has won by locking down incremental gains over a long time. The only way we can beat them is to do the same thing in reverse.

          4. kbolino

            Stopping the left right now is necessary but not sufficient. Part of the problem with revolutionary politics is that it begets reactionaries. The Overton window can shift rightward a lot without ever shifting toward libertarianism.

        3. JD is Unemployed

          With some mega-wishful thinking I made a lists of states I think I would like to live in, and states that I would definitely not. I just sent it to a US friend not too long ago so I’ll see if I can find it:

          Alabama Y
          Alaska TBD
          Arizona Y
          Arkansas N
          California N
          Colorado N
          Connecticut N
          Delaware N
          Florida TBD
          Georgia Y
          Hawaii Y
          Idaho TBD
          Illinois N
          Indiana N
          Iowa N
          Kansas Y
          Kentucky Y
          Louisiana TBD
          Maine N
          Maryland N
          Massachusetts N
          Michigan N
          Minnesota N
          Mississippi TBD
          Missouri TBD
          Montana Y
          Nebraska TBD
          Nevada Y
          New Hampshire Y
          New Jersey N
          New Mexico Y
          New York N
          North Carolina N
          North Dakota N
          Ohio TBD
          Oklahoma Y
          Oregon N
          Pennsylvania N
          Rhode Island N
          South Carolina N
          South Dakota N
          Tennessee Y
          Texas Y
          Utah Y
          Vermont N
          Virginia N
          Washington N
          West Virginia N
          Wisconsin N
          Wyoming TBD

          I may be way off on a few of these. I have no priority skills anyway.

          1. ChipsnSalsa

            What “floats your boat” for wanting to go somewhere? The beauty / majesty of nature? interesting cities / places to go? etc.

            That would dramatically effect the list.

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            Depending on what you are looking for out of life, MN should be on your list.
            Pro: Great place to raise a family. School choice. Spectacular outdoor recreation.
            Con: Winter lasts 14 months. Shit food. You might have to meet Pope Jimbo.

          3. Missouri doesn’t really have much to recommend it if you’re out for beauty. It’s pretty, but normal Midwestern pretty. You can get it anywhere. St. Louis is a shithole. Springfield is in the Ozarks (that’s something!). Kansas City, well. I can’t toot its horn enough. If you like a high standard of living and a low cost of living, with good arts and music and food and sports, then it’s got that in spades. Yes, it has its shithole spots, but people aren’t moving into KC and out of StL for no reason.

            But hurry. I see Denverization in our future.

      3. AlmightyJB

        It was all about Brexit. They held an election and the people voted for Brexit. The establishment said fuck you. We’re above the people and you’ll shut the fuck and do what your told. Even if you were anti-Brexit, that should piss you off if you have any self-respect whatsoever. Even children will rebel if you tell them they don’t matter.

  49. Pat

    FTC may block Facebook’s integration plans for WhatsApp and Instagram

    The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is reportedly weighing an injunction against Facebook to stop it from integrating WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook Messenger into its own services, according to the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. The news follows reports that the the FTC has been investigating Facebook as part of an antitrust investigation, on the grounds that it’s policies are anticompetitive.

    The commission started its investigation after Facebook announced that it would unify the technical underpinnings of WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook. That would allow its 2.7 billion users to send private, encrypted messages from one app that could be received on another. “We’re building a foundation for social communication aligned with the direction people increasingly care about: messaging each other privately,” he said at the time.

    The FTC’s primary concern is that Facebook’s acquisition of rival apps like Instagram has reduced social networking competition. The commission believes that if Facebook tightly integrated those apps into its own infrastructure, it would become much more difficult to break up.

    1. kbolino

      How is this a bad thing? Let them all come together in one giant platform so that the sane people can more easily write it all off.

  50. Pope Jimbo

    We only tax you because we love you! (no way we are just grabbing benjamins)

    The World Health Organization estimates that a 10 percent rise in prices causes overall smoking rates to drop about 4 percent in high-income countries. Some states are relying on this strategy to work again ― this time to discourage consumers, especially teenagers and young adults, from using e-cigarettes and vaping products.

    Twenty states and the District of Columbia have passed those taxes, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, a nonprofit advocacy group. But whether taxes would be as effective in combating vaping as they have been with smoking is unknown, state officials and researchers say.

    Early studies suggest that hiking prices on vapers would have the same effect as on smokers.

    “There are so many parallels here, and that’s why we’re taxing them like cigarettes,” said Richard Auxier, a researcher at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center who specializes in state and local tax policy. “But [vaping] is new, and we should all just take a minute to know that it all might play out a little differently.”

    The interest in taxes comes as states grapple with a marked increase in e-cigarette use among teens. Nearly 28 percent of high school students reported using e-cigarettes in 2019, the latest National Youth Tobacco Survey reported. More than 5 million youth reported using e-cigarettes that year.

    At the same time, public health officials are investigating an outbreak in serious lung injuries associated with some vaping products.

    Molly Moilanen, vice president for communications of ClearWay Minnesota, a nonprofit advocacy and research organization, said increasing the cost of tobacco products adds muscle to reduction strategies.

    “We know from tobacco prevention that price is king when it comes to inspiring people to quit, and when it comes to preventing youth from ever starting,” said Moilanen.

    1. “We know from tobacco prevention that price is king when it comes to inspiring people to quit, and when it comes to preventing youth from ever starting,” said Moilanen.

      Then explain New York.

    2. Pat

      Smoking taxes decrease the rate of smoking, but thankfully this principle doesn’t apply to other things that are taxed, like income, capital gains, dividends, and interest.

      1. leon

        And certainly the Minimum wage doesn’t kill jobs. In fact it creates more! /Krugman.

      2. invisible finger

        “Smoking taxes decrease the rate of smoking”

        Citation please.

        If anything, smoking taxes pushed smokers toward vaping and dope – and anti-depressants because insurance pays for it.

        1. Pat

          Granting them their premise for the sake of argument. Although I’m sure cigarette taxes have affected smoking rates like any other distortionary tax does.

          1. invisible finger

            In a vacuum, probably. But they want to pretend people replaced cigarette smoking with healthy habits, which is so ridiculous that I won’t even grant them their premise.

        2. kbolino

          You get more of what you reward, and less of what you punish.

          An important corollary to this Iron Law is, there are infinitely many alternatives to everything.

    3. Rhywun

      I can’t think of a more effective way to push young people on to sketchy black-market vapes. Congratulations – you now have more deaths on your hands.

      1. leon

        It will just lead to more calls to ban vaping all together. Humanity just can’t handle that kind of danger.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Well the journalo did make sure to check off the requirement of referencing the “outbreak in serious lung injuries associated with some vaping products”.

          Even though pretty much everyone has already admitted that all of those injuries were caused by kids vaping black market THC juice that had Vitamin E acetate in it.

          Got to keep the herd panicked and moving. If you let them settle down they might not listen to you.

  51. The Late P Brooks

    The Penn Wharton researchers also say that Warren’s wealth tax plan will not raise the roughly $3.75 trillion in revenue over a decade that the candidate maintains it would.
    Instead, it is expected to bring in between $2.3 trillion and $2.7 trillion. That’s largely because the rich will try to reduce their exposure to the tax in a variety of legal and illegal ways, including setting up charitable foundations, moving the money offshore and putting a lower value on their assets.
    The report does take into account various anti-evasion measures, but without more details of what Warren would propose, researchers could not evaluate their effectiveness.
    The campaign responded that it developed detailed anti-evasion efforts to address problems encountered in other countries.
    “This analysis does not study Elizabeth’s actual plans — it does not account for the strong anti-evasion measures in her wealth tax and does not even attempt to analyze the specific investments Elizabeth is committed to making with the wealth tax revenue,” said Saloni Sharma, Warren’s national deputy press secretary.

    Once the wreckers and hoarders see a few of their co-conspirators climb the steps to the guillotine, they’ll fall in line.

    1. Suthenboy

      Her tax plan would raise exactly zero dollars from ‘the rich’. All of the money would come from the middle class.
      In any case, I will be president before she will.

    2. leon

      The campaign responded that it developed detailed anti-evasion efforts to address problems encountered in other countries.

      Avoiding taxes legally is the same as evasion!

  52. PieInTheSky

    pairing cocktails with watches

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcRFzaUyoH8

    1. Pat

      My dad was always hot shit for Panerai. I have no idea what the appeal is. I get the legacy, but they’re so fucking generic. The only model more overrated IMO is the Royal Oak.

      That Monaco is nice though. Sensei was just elucidating its history as the first automatic chronograph a few weeks ago.

  53. MikeS

    The Pentagon is investigating a contract award for parts of “the wall” built by a contractor openly endorsed by the president.

    Don’t worry about it. Nothing to see here. Move along, citizen.

    1. Suthenboy

      At this point nothing anyone accuses Trump of can be believed. Oh look, another moron crying wolf.

    2. R C Dean

      I do find the Pentagon’s sudden fastidiousness about awarding contracts to be amusing.

  54. Juvenile Bluster

    This is the most seats the Conservatives have won since 1979.

    This is the fewest seats Labour has won since 1935.

    Just wow.

    1. leon

      You know who else took power in 1935ish?

      1. R C Dean

        FDR?

      2. straffinrun

        Bernie?

      3. DOOMco

        The Oklahoma City parking authority?

    2. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      The Liberal Democratic leader, Swinson, lost her seat. So, it’s not just Labour that did worse than expected. That was a pretty clear mandate for Brexit

      1. leon

        She had a scottish seat, and every party got raped by the SNP in scotland.

        1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

          So, Scotland said “no to Brexit”, but harder?

          1. leon

            Kinda. Nationalist parties did better than Unionist Parties apart from the Tories.

          2. Juvenile Bluster

            Scotland said “get us the fuck out of the UK.”

          3. I’d be more excited about that if the SNP wasn’t such a steaming pile of intersectional Socialist shit.

          4. Rhywun

            And of course they would want back in the EU on “day one”.

          5. Yeah, proudly blazing a path towards Scottish independence…to join the EU. Because they need the money for the dole. In a just world, they’d secede, gain their independence, petition the EU, and then be rejected because the EU already has enough freeloading welfare states.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The Labour supporters are claiming the media assassinated Corbyn. As if Corbyn didn’t bury himself.

      And I’m sure they mean the (((media))).

      1. Rhywun

        How dare they use his own words and stated policies against him.

  55. robc

    I discovered I get better comments on articles where people hate my ideas.

    I guess I should finish my Single Land Tax series.

    1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      I like your Single Land Tax articles, you Georgist scum

      1. Tundra

        Nerd fights are the best fights.

  56. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

    So, Labour is in a good place.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELqvJIFWsAE5BFi.jpg:large

    This lady is a member of the House of Lords.

    1. kbolino

      You know, when this whole anti-Israel business (in the West) started up a decade or so ago, I thoroughly believed the distinction between anti-Semite and anti-Israel/anti-Zionist existed. But after a few rounds, “we’re not anti-Semites, and you’d realize that if not for all these nefarious lying Jews”, one does start to have difficulty maintaining the distinction.

      1. Right!? It’d be a lot easier to believe there’s a distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism if it didn’t depend on a worldwide Jewish conspiracy to control the media and governments of the world.

        1. kbolino

          I think one can simultaneously not fully support Israel and also not be an anti-Semite. But the more one believes the Palestinian narrative the more likely they are to find Jews as a whole the enemy. There’s a lot of guilt on Palestine’s side and people who don’t own up to it tend to fall into very bad places idea-wise.

          1. Jarflax

            I used to be in the camp of not fully supporting Israel but the more I looked into what was going on the clearer it became that Israel shows remarkable restraint against the Palestinians. You have a group of people who almost universally call for your nation to be destroyed and your people to be driven into the sea. Those people fire rockets and float incendiary devices on kites and balloons into your land trying to, and frequently succeeding in, killing your people. They raise their preschool children to chant slogans about your extermination, and their older children to be suicide bombers. And all of this while you feed and clothe them, and provide their power and water, and welfare.

            Israel has behaved with saintlike patience. I don’t think I would have stood this as long. All Israel would have to do is turn off the pumps and Gaza would be forced to empty in a week.

          2. kbolino

            Israel is in a difficult situation. They also have to maintain peace with Egypt (re: Gaza) and Jordan (re: West Bank) as functioning states and a not-outright-war relationship with the almost-non-functioning states of Lebanon and Syria. If they get too aggressive, they face a war on all fronts. But the UN has done everything in its power to make the situation worse. It’s a sad thing to say, but the U.S.’s neoimperialist meddling has probably on balance been necessary to offset the UN’s poisonous actions. The Palestinian leadership has generally acted like such utter assholes towards Israel it’s a wonder Israel doesn’t assassinate them more often (they probably got tired of new leader, same old shit).

            But, that does not excuse when Israel fucks over peaceable Palestinians (as few of them as there may be). Lots of people hate Israel, but building a wall on the wrong side of your quasi-border and kicking people out of their jobs and homes, or at least making them jump through lots of hoops to live their lives, is not going to make any friends. Yet that criticism is rarely seen on its own, and instead gets lumped in with all the “apartheid” nonsense.

  57. leon

    Comey reviewed and certified the Carter Page FISA Renewal Application No. 1 on behalf of the FBI on January 12. Chapter Two describes the elements of the certification required by the Director or Deputy Director, including that the information sought through the requested FISA authority is foreign intelligence information that cannot reasonably be obtained by normal investigative techniques and is necessary to protect the United States against clandestine intelligence activities. Comey told the OIG that he had no specific memory of reviewing or signing any of the Carter Page FISA renewal application packages. As we discussed in Chapter Five, Comey recalled reading the first Carter Page application before he certified it and being satisfied that the application seemed factually and legally sufficient when he read it, and he had no questions or concerns before he signed.

    Look, i’m not saying Comey was completely incompetent. But it’s either he was so incompetent as to doubt anything he says or he is a liar who was politically motivated. I don’t believe it when you say “I don’t remember that application for the highly sensitive surveillance of a political campaign member”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Merely an error

    2. ChipsnSalsa

      If you don’t remember that sort of thing, what business to you have heading the FBI?

    3. JaimeRoberto Delecto

      Or he’s signing off on so many FISA applications that he can’t keep them straight, which might be more troubling.

  58. Rebel Scum

    More on VA Dmes tyrannical aims.

    “I would hope they either resign in good conscience, because they cannot uphold the law which they are sworn to uphold, or they’re prosecuted for failure to fulfill their oath,” Democratic Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly told the Washington Examiner of local county police who may refuse to enforce future gun control measures. “The law is the law. If that becomes the law, you don’t have a choice, not if you’re a sworn officer of the law.”

    Sheriffs and elected reps are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the Commonwealth, in which it explicitly states that the government is not allowed to do the things the Dem reps are proposing.

    “The resolutions that are being passed are being ginned up by the gun lobby to try to scare people. What we’re talking about here are laws that will make our communities and our streets safer,” Herring told CBS 6.

    You are literally trying to make millions of people criminals overnight just because they own modern technology firearms.

    “So, when Virginia passes these gun safety laws that they will be followed, they will be enforced,” he added.

    I suppose we will see.

    1. Rebel Scum

      Dems* and the second to last line should be italicized… *gets coffee*

    2. AlmightyJB

      “The law is the law. If that becomes the law, you don’t have a choice, not if you’re a sworn officer of the law.”

      Constitution Schmonstitution.

    3. leon

      “The law is the law. If that becomes the law, you don’t have a choice, not if you’re a sworn officer of the law.”

      Oathbreakers calling other guys out for standing to their oath.

    4. Rhywun

      they will be enforced

      LOL. This person has no idea how “law enforcement” actually works.

    5. kbolino

      Government and business must have a conscience… which is why we’re going to force everybody who acts on their conscience out.

    6. ChipsnSalsa

      This is going to be fantastic. Instead of having to travel to Syria to be part of an armed resistance force, people will only have to go to Virginia.

  59. Hyperion

    Good morning, Glibtards!

    Heh, I like this.

    We love our democracy! Or maybe not.

    Yes, that’s the ticket. When you can’t win elections, just stage a coup against the opposing team. At least they’re just right out admitting it now. I appreciate honesty. Fuckwits.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      the interests of our adversary Russia to advance

      These fucksticks would start a war with Russia just to win an election.

    2. Rebel Scum

      “We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems when the President threatens the very integrity of that election,” Nalder said.

      That about says it all, I think.

      Nor can we sit on our hands while the President undermines our national security—and while he allows his personal interests and the interests of our adversary Russia to advance.”

      Sending arms to Ukraine is in the interest of Russia. Got it.

      1. Pat

        I’ll never tire of bringing up the pummeling Romney took in 2012 for calling Russia our biggest geopolitical adversary.

        1. Wait, what?

          /memory-holed

      1. Hyperion

        I called this one early. Yes, we are going to get 5 more years of this, at least. And more if another GOP president is elected after Trump leaves office. If this bunch of crazies ever get control of all three branches of all 3 branches of government, we are all truly fucked, because just say goodbye to what that is left of the rule of law, along with all your money.

    3. leon

      “We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems when the President threatens the very integrity of that election,”

      A reminder for people:

      https://www.npr.org/2016/10/18/498297287/5-reasons-and-then-some-not-to-worry-about-a-rigged-election

      1. Beware the People of Walmart.

  60. Tundra

    Holy shit!

    Ford (NYSE:F) issues a recall for 490,574 Super Duty SuperCrew vehicles with carpet flooring due to the risk of a post-crash fire.

    That’s gonna leave a mark.

    Interestingly, the 150s already went through this recall. They had to have known the SDs were next. I guess kicking the can down the road makes some sense, but it sure looks hinky.

    1. Pat

      In the event of a crash the 1 in 10 million chance of a carpet fire is probably in the bottom 10 things you’d worry about, but hey, unsafe at any speed and all that.

    2. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      Fix Or Repair Daily

      1. Found On Road Dead

        My son cannot stop talking about his love of Ford x50s. We’re a Dodge (truck) household. I don’t know where he gets it.

        1. Jarflax

          Because he is a free market fan! Chrysler and GM have been nursing at the Government teat for decades.

          1. We’re not exactly in the tank for GM, Grannycar excepted, but I had her because that’s what I could afford and she served me well. Also, she fixed her own transmission problem, like any good granny should.

        2. Festus

          Hey Moj! Thanks for the well-wishes the other day. Means a lot!

          1. Festus

            I hope that your bumps are smaller than mine.

          2. Well, Suthenboy’s comment yesterday about a wreck he saw pretty much put my thinking to rights.

        3. Gustave Lytton

          Having driven a Ram for close to 80,000 miles for work, I understand exactly why he would feel that way. Looks nice on the surface, but so many fit and finish sloppiness that I can only wonder about the stuff I can’t see. It would have been a great production truck forty years ago, but quality overall has increased and FCA isn’t keeping up.

          1. The Dodge or the Ford?

            We bought our Ram at 350,000 miles because we only intended to go to Home Depot (I was doing major DIY then). It’s at 370,000 miles now and it’s been a relatively good investment for our purposes.

            I don’t think I would buy a new truck even if I had fuck-you money. I want a truck for one thing and showing off wealth is not it.

          2. Gustave Lytton

            The Ram. Before that I’ve had a slew of F150’s and a F450 for work. Most were around 150k-250k miles with me putting on about 50k-100k of those.

            My personal truck is a f150 with ~315k miles with no plans to replace it anytime soon. I bought it new twenty years ago. I’d buy new again, but I don’t turn over vehicles every couple of years.

  61. A Leap at the Wheel

    Hello Glibertaumauta and Gliberinas. With the uncanny mystic powers of Friday the 13th, I am posting from bizzaro-world website called clASSical liberals, where Leap makes Tundra-like good-morning posts every day.

    I am looking forward to Sack O’Saccharine’s episode of “The Poorly Done WIndsor Knot and the Hair.” I expect big things, likely a nice morality tale about our plucky, anthropomorphic heroes standing on queue and drinking tea and avoiding dental hygiene and other British things.

    Regular poster QQ will likely be along soon to go off topic with another of his No Fap November challenges, which seems out of place, but we appreciate the effort.

    I will leave you with this 1960’s singer-songwriter classic in honor of Friday the 13th.

    Hope you all have a wonderful day.

    1. A Leap at the Wheel
      1. It appears that in my dotage, I have mostly grown out of metal.

        I haz a sad.

        1. Festus

          #metoo

          1. I am into chill lounge (not gonna call it jazz) to work and go to sleep to.

    2. Fourscore

      And I hope your day is 2X wonderful, Leap. Who is this anonymous singer/songwriter? If he/she remains hidden then we can expect a lot of guessing games.

      1. Fourscore

        I was expecting Gordon Lightfoot.

      2. A Leap at the Wheel

        Dino Cazares, lead singer of 1990’s era industrial heavy metal band Fear Factory. It was an attempt at a joke.

    3. leon

      Is there a commenter named Leon, who never makes spelling mistakes?

      1. Fourscore

        Yes and I’m proud to call him a friend. Leon also knows apostrophe’s.

        1. leon

          Sounds like a real douche.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        never makes spelling mistakes?

        I think you are talking about Noel.

    4. Gustave Lytton

      Was expecting something like Georgy Girl

      1. Fourscore

        Now I’m seeking that out

    5. SugarFree

      Coiffe and Bobbie‘s the name, thank you. And they’ve done nearly 14 episodes in the last 8 years, an amazing amount of Britsh quality television.

  62. The Late P Brooks

    I don’t believe it when you say “I don’t remember that application for the highly sensitive surveillance of a political campaign member”

    There were just so many of them. It’s hard to keep track.

  63. The Late P Brooks

    “I would hope they either resign in good conscience, because they cannot uphold the law which they are sworn to uphold, or they’re prosecuted for failure to fulfill their oath,” Democratic Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly told the Washington Examiner of local county police who may refuse to enforce future gun control measures. “The law is the law. If that becomes the law, you don’t have a choice, not if you’re a sworn officer of the law.”

    Something something no reasonable prosecutor

    1. Gustave Lytton

      “I would hope they either resign in good conscience, because they cannot uphold the law which they are sworn to uphold, or they’re prosecuted for failure to fulfill their oath,” Democratic Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly

      “WTF is self-awareness??”

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The law also requires Congress to authorize acts of war. Connolly has frequently supported war in Syria, yet never actually voted for it.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      Yeah. The Law is the Law!

      – Bull Connor

  64. Festus

    Hey Suthen! Sorry to hear about your Lady’s problem. Right after I got sick Wifey blew her shoulder. Lots of fun doing the day-to-day…

  65. The Late P Brooks

    I’ll never tire of bringing up the pummeling Romney took in 2012 for calling Russia our biggest geopolitical adversary.

    You mean hard line anarcholbertarian tear-down-the-institutions-of-democracy bomb thrower Mitt Romney, who was bound and determined to put us all back in chains? That one?

  66. Rebel Scum

    Yeah, sure.

    Donaldson said, “Do we all believe that it’s great to call on a foreign power to aid you in your re-election campaign to the United States? As you said earlier, Chris, we have money, restrictions, foreigners can’t give money, China can’t send money. Ukraine can’t. Vladimir Putin can’t send money on the table. But this is okay? No, it’s not okay. So the Democrats have the case. The Republicans don’t argue the case. They argue the process. They say it’s your witch hunt, you are out to get him, you have always hated him, and they pound the table like a lawyer who doesn’t have the case.”

    He added, “How many Republicans in the Senate are going to vote convict? None. None So whatever evidence that you and I or anyone else thinks as they are on the table is disregarded by today’s Republican Party as represented by their Washington representatives. There are a lot of good Republicans in this country, and I hope the party is reconstituted as it once was. We need two good parties with good people on both sides.”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Chris, we have money, restrictions, foreigners can’t give money, China can’t send money. Ukraine can’t.

      Somebody should tell the Clintons.

      1. Pat

        MoveOn.exe

      2. Sean

        And the Bidens.

      3. Pope Jimbo

        Wasn’t there some kerfuffle about Obama’s campaign not requiring any verification that a small donor was actually a US Citizen?

        Can’t be bothered to look it up, but I sort of remember that.

    2. Pat

      There are a lot of good Republicans in this country, and I hope the party is reconstituted as it once was. We need two good parties with good people on both sides.

      Some of them, I assume, are good people.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        “Good” roughly translated as submissive and pro-everything big government.

      2. Hyperion

        “We need two good parties with good people on both sides.”

        Translation: We need two parties who will go along with all the horseshit we dream up. /democrats

    3. leon

      There are a lot of good Republicans in this country, and I hope the party is reconstituted as it once was. We need two good parties with good people on both sides.”

      I want the party that rolled over, and did what we told them, back.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        The party that would run for cover when they were called racist and misogynist.

    4. Rhywun

      Go home, Sam. You’re drunk.

    5. kbolino

      Donald Trump’s biggest mistake was thinking the rules were consistent. They get to interfere with his campaign, they get to make shit up to abuse the law to go after him, they get to have the media and establishment run interference for all of this, but those rules are not his rules.

  67. Rebel Scum

    So we are now against fundamental change?

    Discussing a Senate impeachment trial, Sharpton said, “If the citizens start emailing and putting pressure on their senators to go by the evidence and not the party, we don’t know what could happen. We don’t know what may come out of the trial.”

    He continued, “When you have a president who last night went to Pennsylvania and called the FBI scum for investigating him and Russia when there was a clear report by the inspector general that there was a basis for investigation, we’re looking at the total upheaval of government. Who would have ever thought that a president of the United States would undermine and use such language against their own FBI agents?”

    He added, “We are looking at someone who wants to totally disassemble the way this country has been built and established and establish it on a premise that is not fair and equal for all.”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I’d be happy if he disassembled the FBI/CIA

      1. Suthenboy

        I’d be happy if he dissembled Al Sharpton.

        If the senate goes by the evidence we know exactly what will happen.
        How dare the President talk that way about the FBI? How dare the FBI attempt a coup against a duly elected president? How ’bout that Al?
        There was no basis for investigation on Russia and they knew it because they were the ones that made up the lie.
        Not equal for all? What the fuck is he talking about?
        Kicking the legs out from under a corrupt and wildly incompetent elite class that has nothing but disdain for the people they work for is not the same thing as dissembling this country, lying fuckwit.

        I am getting where I avoid the news as it pisses me off more and more.

        1. kbolino

          Even if there was a legitimate basis to investigate, the FBI is supposed to work with the campaign to carry it out. Instead, they acted like the Trump campaign was the adversary from day one. Everybody who’s saying this was all on the up-and-up seems to be glossing over the part where the sitting government made an enemy of a candidate and later elected official. Even if you argue with a straight face that this wasn’t about politics, it was definitely unprofessional, cliquish, and ultimately insubordinate.

          1. grrizzly

            they acted like the Trump campaign was the adversary from day one

            They acted like they genuinely believed that Donald Trump was a Russian spy. This is the only situation where their behavior could have been justified retroactively.

          2. kbolino

            The difficulty with that claimed motivation is that it seems entirely post hoc. At the time, they don’t seem to have written down anything to that effect.

          3. grrizzly

            I wasn’t talking about what actually happened but purely about an alternative universe where the actions of the state police were somehow justified if not constitutional. More like killing baby Hitler.

            In real life, the FBI was directing Maria Butina’s handler to introduce her to Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump to have a justification to spy on them and their campaigns.

          4. Suthenboy

            They acted like it, but since it was a lie that they themselves invented out of thin air they knew it wasn’t true. They acted like banana republic monkeys. That’s what they did, and now this impeachment is even worse. It is on par with a Soviet show trial.

    2. leon

      we’re looking at the total upheaval of government.

      The end of civilization.

    3. Fatty Bolger

      More proof that Sharpton is just a grifter, as if we needed any. Real civil rights leaders know better than to trust the FBI.

  68. The Late P Brooks

    The Republicans don’t argue the case. They argue the process. They say it’s your witch hunt, you are out to get him, you have always hated him, and they pound the table like a lawyer who doesn’t have the case.

    Out of nowhere. Without evidence.

    1. kbolino

      Well, even if that was the whole argument, it’s not exactly wrong.

  69. Pat

    Emotion-detecting tech should be restricted by law – AI Now

    A leading research centre has called for new laws to restrict the use of emotion-detecting tech.

    The AI Now Institute says the field is “built on markedly shaky foundations”.

    Despite this, systems are on sale to help vet job seekers, test criminal suspects for signs of deception, and set insurance prices.

    It wants such software to be banned from use in important decisions that affect people’s lives and/or determine their access to opportunities.

    The US-based body has found support in the UK from the founder of a company developing its own emotional-response technologies – but it cautioned that any restrictions would need to be nuanced enough not to hamper all work being done in the area.

    Our best neural nets are still struggling to differentiate a house cat from a doberman and Amazon figures if you once searched for a popcorn popper in 2003 you probably still want to buy one every time you log onto their marketplace, but sure, this is a pressing concern.

    1. cyto

      Yeah, I was gonna say….

      There’s so much snake oil on the market these days, this bizarre niche is hardly the top priority. All 3 of the drug store chains I use have entire isles devoted to snake oil. They have even started putting the snake oil version right next to the real medicine, so you have to be careful about reading the label to see if you are actually buying anything that could help.

      1. Fatty Bolger

        A lot of that crap is homeopathic. Which means they’re selling tiny bottles of water for ~$5 a pop. Nice racket.

    2. leon

      You can pry my mood ring form my cold dead fingers.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      I am looking forward to the day that CSPAN is able to superimpose the Deception Meter on every politician and witness during the next impeachment trial. Should be gobs of fun.

      And is it too late to suggest that the unit of measurement for deception is the Schiff?

      1. leon

        Hmmm How many Shiffs in a Clinton?

        1. Jarflax

          Get out of SugarFree’s mind!

        2. Pope Jimbo

          1 Schiff = 2 Clintons = 4 Comey-Clappers

          1. kbolino

            I don’t think Schiff has quite the same totally coincidental body count as the Clintons, so it seems out he would be worth more.

        3. ChipsnSalsa

          I was told there would be no math.

      2. Gustave Lytton

        It’s not a lie if you believe it.

  70. cyto

    Anyone remember that story about the Jewish deli getting all shot up? It was everywhere – there were pundits all over CNN and MSNBC and the Today Show explaining the importance of this and the rise of antisemitism under Trump.

    Suddenly, this story seems to have disappeared. I don’t see any pundits on CNN or MSNBC discussing it at all…… I wonder what happened?

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Oh I noticed.

      Just to show you how media sensationalism works. My wife didn’t hear about it. Since when don’t you NEVER hear about such crimes I asked her? Suddenly a light bulb went off in her head. Until now, she would just listen to me about the media. With this, she finally understood with a concrete example she can relate to how evil media is.

      I added, ‘notice how no one is standing on cold dead bodies screaming for gun control after the murders’.

      She came home as it were.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        “The New York Times called them “sidewalk ministers” who practice “tough love.” The paper quoted Heidi Beirich of the Southern Poverty Law Center who described them as victims of racism and claimed that they were non-violent.

        The Washington Post, in its own puff piece on the Black Hebrew Israelites, also falsely described them as non-violent, and concluded that, “Israelite street preaching in parts of D.C., Philadelphia and New York is commonplace, a familiar if odd accent to city life.”

        https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/12/black-nationalist-hate-group-praised-media-shot-daniel-greenfield/

        The new fundraiser boss at Chick-FIl-A stopped donations to organizations like The Salvation Army and gave to…..SPLC.

        1. cyto

          That’s how that industry works… pay off the right folks, and suddenly we don’t harass you any more.

    2. Was it that white supremacist couple who met on Facebook or something? I seem to remember something about that. Donald Trump pardoned them and they went back to Russia, right?

  71. Suthenboy

    From Van Dyke: “The Senate confirmed President Trump’s 50th circuit court nominee on Wednesday despite the pick being rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Association (ABA).”

    The fuckwits in congress perpetrating the illegal impeachment sham are doing a lot more damage than they realize. In the end all the government has is credibility. It is true for the courts, the executive and the gaggle of half-wits in the legislature. Credibility. If they lose that the people will walk off and leave them and there isn’t much the government can do about it.
    Credibility bleeds over from one branch to another, from one office to another. So does damage to credibility. At this point, the legislators and many of the Obama executives have lied through their teeth so many times, told some of the biggest whoppers we have ever heard and continue to do so shamelessly, it is hard to believe anything said about Trump. We know that many in the executive are sympathetic to the hysterical, fanatic anti-Trump crowd and we have watched federal judges make some of the most outrageous rulings I have ever seen. They have cast away rule of law, reason and any sense of propriety or sensibility. Christ, look what they did with Kavenaugh.

    Until someone proves their allegations, and I mean prove, I have come to the ‘fuck you, liar’ point to just about anything I hear. From he looks of things in Virginia I am not the only one fed up with the ratfucking shitweasels on the left. They were just so sure they were on the brink of total power after Obama t’eed it up for them and then Trump yanked the rug out from under them. Is it gonna come to blows? I hope not, but I won’t be surprised if it does.

    1. Is it gonna come to blows?

      My money is still on No, but I should really write another Civil War 2 article now that impeachment is on the horizon

      1. MikeS

        I look forward to reading that next week.

    2. cyto

      Anyone who isn’t right there with him, just go back and watch the Kavenaugh hearings. And then watch the Today show interviews with the MAGA hat wearing Sandman kid and the sweet native elder who he harassed. That should set your mood right.

  72. The AP has the best picture of boris Johnson on their brexit article.

    1. MikeS

      Did he give that statement at ComicCon?

        1. Rhywun

          LOL

    2. grrizzly

      There were six independent candidates in Boris Johnson’s district. Plus a candidate from the Monster Raving Loony Party. Boris’s victory speech was long enough that one of the furries behind him (must have been one of the independent candidates) apparently got too hot and started to take off his costume.

      1. MikeS

        “Elmo sweating like a pig in this thing”

  73. At what point do you say, “I have no more control or influence over my children’s choices. They are now responsible for them.” I want to tell myself I did my best, but I didn’t. I didn’t spend enough time or energy with them when they were younger and more impressionable. I wanted them to be independent enough to survive in the world at 18, but I don’t think my approach worked and now I’m worried I didn’t teach them the right lessons.

    1. kbolino

      Control? 18, unless you end up caring for your grandkids, and even then exercise carefully
      Influence? Not at any age, only when it’s more destructive than constructive.

      1. kbolino

        (FWIW, I don’t consider it control of children when the child is over 18 and living at home, that’s a landlord relationship and those rules are optional: the tenant can always move out)

        1. That is the plan. Rent free if you’re going to school. If not, get a job and pay rent.

          I worry for their future, and I always had that in mind but still missed the target by a mile.

          1. invisible finger

            That was the same deal I had at age 18 – and I had to pay for school myself. I was told this when I turned 12. So I started working part time at age 15. Since then the price of college has outpaced the rate of inflation, and part-time work for teenagers is harder to find. None of that was within your control.

          2. Tundra

            Game’s not over yet!

            I’ve got no advice, as every parent is making it up as they go along. Mistakes are mandatory. Almost every parent I know with kids that age feels like they are failing at different points.

            I think it’s largely part of kids being self-centered, naive assholes. Like every successful relationship there are times when all you can do is grit your teeth and hold on until you make it through that stretch. Tough work, for sure.

          3. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

            Everyone tells me to enjoy them while their young, because you’re still going to worry just as much about them when they’re older, but you won’t be able to protect them anymore.

          4. Tundra

            Yeah, that’s the weird part. You want them out exploring the world, but worry way more when they actually go and do it.

          5. invisible finger

            Most of the reason people that age are self-centered naiive assholes is because they have been infantilized for longer than natural. And most of them resent the infantilization. We prevent children from making decisions – and subsequent mistakes – until they become “adults”; then they have no experience making decisions and learning how to correct their mistakes.

          6. Tundra

            Of course that’s part of it. It’s the nature of children. Struggle and pain is what snaps you out of it and we have less of each than ever before.

            That’s one of the side-effects of incredible prosperity.

            As parents, all we can do is guide the kids into situations that will help them get there. kbolino is right – high standards are important.

          7. kbolino

            Set high standards and stick to them. Don’t be an asshole, but don’t be a pushover, either. Let them fail, and only intervene when absolutely necessary (death or permanent harm; ill advised tattoos and piercings don’t count).

            I’m not a parent, I have only the experience of a child to offer you. I’ve had to set boundaries with my parents, and sometimes I fear I pushed them too far away. But I have also seen my parents smother my brother, who unlike me has children to take care of, and I’ve seen them and his family get stuck in a loop on a love-hate emotional rollercoaster. I wish I could say how to achieve balance easily, but I do think people have to find it for themselves.

    2. invisible finger

      You have influence, but you aren’t the only one. You cease being the main influence sometime around adolescence.

      It’s only been in the last 100 years or so that people even fathomed the idea that a 13 year old isn’t an adult.

    3. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      I’m sorry to hear that you feel that way. I’m sure that your children, no matter how old they are, will still listen to you or at least take your opinion into consideration.
      And letting them fail sometimes can be the most rewarding lesson for them to learn. I hope everything works out for you and your family

    4. Pat

      At what point do you say, “I have no more control or influence over my children’s choices. They are now responsible for them.”

      Looking back on your own life, when did that happen for you? When did you say “my parents are no longer in control or influence my choices, I’m responsible for them”. It’s probably not a bright line. I can tell you that I still consult with my mother regularly about major life decisions. She doesn’t exercise any control, but she certainly has an influence because I love and respect her. If you’ve taught your kids how to think rather than what to think and if you’ve presented them a set of values, even if you’ve failed to perfectly live up to them, that’s about the best you can do.

      1. Looking back on your own life, when did that happen for you? When did you say “my parents are no longer in control or influence my choices, I’m responsible for them”.

        I honestly couldn’t tell you, which is distressing. If I can’t make good decisions for myself (see: this piece of shit house), how am I supposed to teach them anything worthwhile? I can only be frank about our mistakes, point to them, and say, “Don’t do this thing here what I did.”

        1. Pat

          I can tell you from my experience that I learned a lot more from my parents by observation and analysis than I ever did by explicit didactics (particularly my dad). I suspect it’s the same for most of us. Part of the reason that I still regularly consult with my mom is because I know she’s got a perspective forged from a lot of bad experiences and mistakes. I’ve profited far more from her wisdom on what not to do wrong than I did from her admonitions on what to do right.

          Now I’m a fairly cautious person and I was much more inclined to take on board my parents’ perspective than some of my peers, so your mileage may vary of course. But I’ll bet you your children have absorbed a lot more than you think they have or than they’ll let on now.

    5. A Leap at the Wheel

      At what point do you say, “I have no more control or influence over my children’s choices. They are now responsible for them.”

      When they locate and cut out the sub-dermal shock collar I had implanted.

      Honest answer – it depends. For me it was age 12, but I was an outlier. I don’t know if its comforting or not, but parenting style, as long as its within the range of “acceptable in the US in 2019 and won’t get DCS called on you” doesn’t impact kids outcomes too much. They are who the are going to be, we can only influence the flavor (can’t make them spiritualist, but can guide them to Christianity or New Age Hippy Shit if they have that inclination) and we can influence how much they like us. But ending up in jail or not. Marriage before or after kids. Lifetime income? That’s more a product of genetics and outside-the-home environment (ie what economic forces are at play wrt marriage and kids).

    6. Fatty Bolger

      You loved them. You cared for them. You were there for them. In the end, that’s all you can do. They are their own people, and will make their own decisions. But you gave them a bedrock to stand on, and never, ever underestimate the value of that.

      1. Thank you. From the bottom of my heart. That is what I needed to know.

    7. leon

      Just remember, that no matter what happens, Pretty much everyone still loves there mommy.

    8. JaimeRoberto Delecto

      It sounds like they are in the phase that my dad called “going stupid”. Because of their youth they think they know more than you do. In the next 10-15 years you will likely become a lot smarter in their eyes.

      My son is in that phase now. I just tell him what the consequences of his actions can be, but that he’s the one that has to deal with it, so he should do as he sees fit. He often ignores me, but I think that he grudgingly sees that I have a point. In the big picture, he’s pretty good despite his screwups.

      1. Pat

        In the next 10-15 years you will likely become a lot smarter in their eyes.

        When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years.

      2. XY is going to be 14 tomorrow. I just found out his out-of-the-house life is a fucking soap opera (a very stupid one), and that his most pressing emotional issues aren’t at home.

        “Going stupid.”

        I can live with that.

        1. Rather, I can live THROUGH it.

  74. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

    The working class ensured Boris Johnson’s victory in the UK, much like they delivered victory to Trump. Considering that this class seems to be in open revolt against the status quo in the West wouldn’t it make sense for minor political parties that embrace novel positions in conflict with the status quo to cater or try to win this demographic rather than chasing upper income voters who have become solidly wedded to parties that reject any attempt to alter business as usual? I guess what I’m wondering is at what point do we acknowledge that “libertarianism” without “populism” is mental masturbation, at best, and the least popular ideology in the world, at worst?

    1. Pat

      Libertarianism has always had that “muh sekret club” bullshit going on. It’s certainly not going to embrace populism when it schisms into 40 different factions on banal minutiae like land-value tax. And for better or worse, the intellectual heft behind libertarianism has always been firmly in the elite/upper crust.

      1. kbolino

        It also doesn’t help that the working class was captured by quasi-socialism in the early 1900s and hasn’t been all that liberal since (not that they’re unique in this regard).

    2. cyto

      The one group that would really be in the best position to do that – the greens – is so deeply wedded to communist doctrine about corporations and capitalism being evil that they couldn’t make that play if their life depended on it.

      In fact, that is the play that the far left has always been trying to make… but they make it with race baiting and class warfare. That stuff got old a really long time ago, but in an age with 3% unemployment, it is even less likely to have any traction.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The British election should have caused Nancy to shit a little in her diaper.

    4. A Leap at the Wheel

      That’s a good point, but have you considered SHUT UP YOU FUCKING DISGUSTING POOR

      1. Tundra

        Harsh.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          Yeah, but out intellectual betters running the LP and main-stream libertarian think tanks have demonstrated pretty clearly where their priorities are.

          Thank the Lord for the Institute for Justice. They seem like the only folks out there in the trenches applying libertarian theory and ideas to help the worst off among us. I know they are a secular organization, but they are the only ones washing dirty feet and hugging lepers right now.

          1. leon

            Yup. I love IJ.

            While i might get depressed on the Qualified immunity case or two, i do get hopeful every time i listen to the Short Circuit podcast.

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            Unlike Eminent Domain, the continued degradation of the 4th amendment, etc, I don’t see how QI can possibly survive this generation of justices on the court. No one under 45 in a post-cellphone world thinks its a good idea.

          3. Tundra

            So Jesus was a libertarian!

            I knew it!

          4. A Leap at the Wheel

            There’s actually a pretty good argument that he was…

            1) Major focus of his early sermons where “Don’t be like the hypocrites” defined as the religious leaders obsessed with the legislation instead of the law.
            2) Acknowledged the power of the state, but not the moral claims it made.
            3) Go drunk with his homies and told them to stay strapped or get clapped on his last night on earth.

          5. Shirley Knott

            Worship me or burn forever isn’t exactly a libertarian stance.

          6. A Leap at the Wheel

            That kind of depends on whether you take those admonitions to be prescriptive or descriptive, doesn’t it?

            I’m not suggesting that God the Father is anything like a libertarian. “Worship me/us, or I will cast you into hell” =/= “Worship me/us, or my dad is probably going to cast you into hell, and he only gave me one chance to go retrieve those condemned, and I already did that.”

      2. A Leap at the Wheel

        No, I’m off to put narcissistic Sherlock Holmes quotes on my twitter profile and see if I can scrounge up an invite to a cocktail party. I do hope they have enough fruit sushi this time.

    5. leon

      demographic rather than chasing upper income voters

      But if we don’t chase after elites we won’t get to write things like “My stuff is meant for college educated people”.

      I posted this yesterday, but i find it kinda ironic that the party of the working man only did well in districts that had large percentages of college educated people.

      As for Libertarianism. It’s awkward because Libertarianism is individualisitc wich is easily conflated with “Elitism”. Saying “The mob is not knowledgeable enough about my situation to dictate how i should live” quickly transforms to “This Elite Technocrat has scientifically determined how you should live”.

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        I posted this yesterday, but i find it kinda ironic that the party of the working man only did well in districts that had large percentages of college educated people.

        AOC did worse among the uneducated and ethnic minorities than the white guy she beat. Its all totemic now.

        1. Chipwooder

          There’s a schism lurking in the Democratic Party. That Obama coalition of poor minorities and rich gentry whites will inevitably split, because the poor minorities don’t give a flying fuck about the alphabet soup crowd or global warming, which is pretty much all the Lexus leftists care about.

          1. A Leap at the Wheel

            Yep. I’m begging for a GOP’er to run on “No Rapes to get on Airplane. No children trapped in failing schools. No more racist cops. Tiny American Flags for All.”

      2. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

        I think libertarians are sometimes too “learned”, if that makes sense. For instance, even among the commentariat, we could go on with long arguments about the “Council of Worms” or the “Treaty of Westphalia” or “Woodrow Wilson”. And that stuff is great, but it also builds the false impression among us that somehow our natural allies are other educated people who understand this stuff, but the credentialed are not all that into us. Increasingly, if you have a college degree you are less likely to embrace small government, maybe in large part because so many white collar jobs are bound with big government (medicine, education, finance, banking, etc.).

        Maybe we should just look for a different demographic and considering that one of the central points of libertarian thought is essentially “shit’s fucked up” it would seem that the working class would be most receptive to our critical views on the economy and government. Maybe they won’t agree with us on immigration or free trade, but they might accept our solutions, like “fire the bureaucrats, dump the politicians”.

        There doesn’t seem to be a fleshed out motivation behind the working class revolt in the West right now, maybe libertarians could guide that resentment in our direction. I don’t know, but they seem to be just voting against “the Left” and not necessarily voting for “the Right”.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          You really, really, REALLY need to read The Revolt of the Public.

        2. leon

          Maybe they won’t agree with us on immigration or free trade,

          There’s the Rub. The current crop of Beltway Libertarians care about this much more than they care about ending wars.

        3. Pat

          the credentialed are not all that into us

          “If there is hope, it lies in the proles”

          I bet it works out for us about as well as it did for Winston.

    6. Fatty Bolger

      IMO libertarianism doesn’t work as a standalone ideology because it’s too much in conflict with human nature. It’s like socialism in that way, minus the destruction and human misery that goes along with trying to make socialism work. I think of it as more of a guiding principle. The more you can push things in a libertarian direction, the better they will be. But you’ll never actually get there.

      1. “Personal responsibility” is a tough sell.