Category: Food & Drink

  • Enter the Twatter! (Part 2)

    Previously, I wrote up a rant related to Joe Rogan’s interview with Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey.  It got a lot of bad reviews because Joe didn’t ask any tough questions, other than an underhanded attempt at advocating President Trump be banned from Twitter….because apparently he might start a nuclear war with a Tweet.  This rant resulted in my calling Rogan a bitch, and Dorsey full of shit.

    Continuing my self imposed beer ban…meh.  Screw it.  I might need a drink if I have to listen to Dorsey again… This is my review of High West Doube Rye.

    Not my photo

    To give credit where credit is due, Joe took a lot of flack for that podcast.  The majority of his audience is probably right-leaning even if he insists he is a lefty.  They let him know.  He admitted he didn’t know a lot about Twitter’s rules, the controversy surrounding Twitter, and the few instances he did ask Jack direct questions, Jack didn’t have much of an answer.  They agreed to have another podcast, one where Jack brought somebody familiar with the process of banning and specific circumstances leading to the bans: Vijaya Gadde, Global Lead for Legal, Policy, and Trust & Safety at Twitter.

    “Blue checked people at ANTIFA continue to post death threats against me…no action by Twitter”
    “Um….Thank you for your feedback.”

    Joe on the other hand, brought on former Vice reporter, YouTuber, and beanie enthusiast, Tim Pool.

    I will link it here if you have not seen it and would like to.  Otherwise, here are a few notes I thought might be of interest to this group to skip around.  All times are approximate since some of us have to work (Rufus).

     

     

    2:50 Joe asks about Dr. Sean Baker—an advocate of the carnivore diet that had his Twitter account locked, recently.

    – Vijaya assumed it was an algorithm, related to the banner being a lion eating a carcass.

    – Making fun vs. targeting.  Pool suggests the “mob” understands the system, its flaws, and consequently uses it against ideological enemies.

    9:10 “Do you really want corporations to police whats true?”  “But you guys do that…”

    – Pool cites dead-naming and mis-gendering (again at 40:00) as explicit bias against conservatives in Twitter policies.

    – Rule is against hateful targeting.

    – “You say its about behavior, but I have a number of examples….”

    16:30 “All the burden is placed on the victim.”

    18:10  WOODCHIPPER!

    20:20  Tim brings up Milo…

    – “You have a verified user that called for the death of another user…”

    – “That’s your impression, that’s not what happened.”

    25:40  Chuck Johnson

    – “I can understand why you feel that way, I don’t think that’s true.”

    30:39  “We don’t have any PR constraints…”

    – “So why did you ban Alex Jones?”

    – Joe has a response from Jones ready.

    1:00:00  “Shouldn’t you guarantee free speech as consistent with US Law?”

    – “You do not allow “hate speech”, so free speech is not on your platform.”

    – The next 15 mins is excellent and leads into “Learn to Code.”

    1:28:00  “Intersectional POV”

    – “What does that mean?”  (Twitter lady seriously asked that)

    2:00:22  Discussion about Jacob Wahl, fake news, accounts created to disperse news that was misleading vs. Twitter’s response to Rusian Botz 2016.

    – “Did you investigate Jonathan Morgan?”

    – “I don’t know who that is.”  “Why?’

    – Morgan created fake news, manipulated AL senate election with fake reports on Roy Moore.

    – “…but…you investigated the conservative guy…’

    TL/DR version:  Pool was awesome.  Not very often you get to see an actual journo, doing what a journo is actually supposed to do.  So much so that another YouTube Channel called, Body Language Ghost did an analysis of an excerpt of the podcast, which I found interesting. In the end, Twitter insisted it wasn’t biased against conservatives, and Pool cited specific instances suggesting otherwise.  As he put it, no single snowflake is responsible for an avalanche.

    Snob Alert–  This whiskey is a blend.  –Snob Alert

    That doesn’t make it bad.  Its a blend of two ryes one that meets minimum requirements for rye (>50% rye) and another with a whopping 95% rye malts.  I rather enjoy rye, and this one doesn’t disappoint.  Though I should mention the first time I had it was in Salt Lake City, where local ordinances require ice.

     

     

     

  • A Bit of Peat: Some Basic Islay Malts

    Booze reviews are a strange art. Well done, they can give the reader a fine impression of the liquid at hand. More often, the sound like pretentious nonsense. I usually avoid doing them, be it for wine or whiskey. When I give my opinion, I stick to what is clear. Be it tannin or acidity or peat or smoke or dryness. If I can sense some basic aromas I say so. But I limit myself to that because most aromas sensed in a tasting are quite personal. Two top sommeliers may not sense the same thing in the same glass. An Asian may feel other aromas than a European. So while it may be fun to see what others sense, when you go beyond a few things it is getting somewhat ridiculous and you are mostly making shit up. Especially due to fads that affect the tasters. There was a time in which almost every wine blogger in Romania had to smell lychee in white wines, while I had no idea what lychee smelled like.

    I usually simply avoid giving my personal interpretation of faint aromas in alcohols. But for you, fair readers, I will do a proper review and I will stick my nose in the glass and taste the thing until, damn it, I find at least five different flavors.

    Today I will be reviewing a few basic expressions of Islay malts. Islay is an island in Scotland which I will not describe at length. It has the usual Scottish things, bad weather, sheep, funny accents, the standard package. Where it is unique is in the number of distilleries and the quantity of malt produced on less than 250 square miles. And it is a special malt indeed, so much that it is considered a distinct, officially recognized region, one of five such regions in Scotland.

    The whisky is known for peat smoke – the malted barley is dried using peat fires – and its salty briny taste due to being so close to the sea. Unfortunately, peaty whisky has grown in popularity in the last 10-15 years, as such the prices have increased while the quality not always. I blame market forces myself and probably hipsters. Also the Germans.

    While for some it does not matter, I am going to be a snob about it and, besides aromas, positively view whiskeys that are non-chill filtered and natural colored. Because they are just better. I don’t see the point of putting caramel coloring in whiskey just because people associate that color with the drink. And while chill filtration removes cloudiness, cloudiness can be fun, start with a cask strength malt that is clear and get cloudy as you add some water. Also, it may or may not remove flavor.

    I mentioned water because I generally favor higher ABV malts, and I like to drink a little and then add a bit of water for a small change in flavor and booziness. I generally drink my whiskey in a Glencairn glass and do not add ice or anything else. If you are the type to add mixers to whiskey, you disgust me and should be ashamed of yourself you goddamn lowlife.

    Now to get to it, in no particular order. I will judge smell, taste, aftertaste and will include a from the internet section from more tastery tasters than my very own self.

    Ardbeg 10

    Bottled at 46%. aged 10 years in mostly bourbon casks, natural color unchill filtered

    Nose: Peat some smoke – not that overwhelming – something herbal, something of the sea maybe brine maybe some seaweed. Maybe apple.

    Taste: intense, something spice, some vanilla, peat, maybe apple or pear, some sweetness, something savory

    Aftertaste:  long with slight and pleasant bitterness, peat smoke and spice linger.

    From the net : apple pear melon citrus bacon smoked mackerel almonds dark chocolate campfire cigar “bonfire on the beach in autumn” tobacco coffee ginger thyme and rosemary, gentian, juniper, kumquats, clams and sea spray and much much more.

    Verdict: for me this edges Lagavulin by a hair, slightly rougher and less complex but bolder in the flavors it has.

    Laphroaig 10

    40% I really prefer more

    Nose: lots of smoke iodine leather seawater charcoal peat citrus
    Taste: salty and peaty and iodine and something medicinal, a little sweetness, a little salty, a touch of spice and a savory note
    Aftertaste: dry with iodine and a savory note, fairly long. again something slightly bitter
    the iodine is what differentiates it
    From the internet: Match sticks, sulfur, hay, and smoked salt blend together with the ripe sugar elements that define the spirit. mint pine needles camphor ginger vanilla tea sultana

    Verdict: while I like it and will keep buying it for the price, it is bellow Ardbeg and Lagavulin for me. Could use higher ABV

     

    Lagavulin 16

    43%, with coloring and chill filtration

    Nose: as always peat and some smoke more subtle then Ardbeg or Laphroaig. Actually sort of smells like black tea. Complex. Some leather and tobacco. Something else nice I just can’t place. Damp wood is there.
    Taste: Peat and oak some vanilla. smooth an complex with all flavors well integrated, less dominated by one or other. some sweetness salt and pepper. Unlike some that get sharper in the mouth this mellows towards the finish,
    Aftertaste: Long some peat some dried fruit or other
    From the internet:  Orange pineapple brine Lapsang Souchong tea and pipe tobacco, fish boxes and kippers,  laurel and light cereal,  creosote, with hints of kelp and a little touch of iodine, Dried fruit, caramel, vanilla, bbq, sherried biscuits,  savory, roasted almonds, baked apples,

    Verdict: probably the most refined of the bunch, but pricier and lower ABV than ideal. I like it, but the Ardbeg slightly edges it.

     

    Kilchoman Sanaig

    Bottled at 46% unchill filtered natural color, partly Oloroso partly bourbon cask  3-5 years old

    Kilchoman is different from the rest and I am not sure it even has a standard expression. I chose Sanaig after carefully analyzing the different bottlings that exist and deciding to pick this particular one as it was the only one they had at the store.  The distillery is as close as you get to boutique, it only began production in June 2005, and was the first to be built on the island of Islay in 124 years and it does the hipster things like using very traditional methods.

    Color: natural

    Nose: Little peat, a bit of smoke, dried fruit and vanilla.

    Palate: Peat smoke and citrus with slightly spicy slightly sweet. Slight roughness to it but I like that

    Finish: peat smoke and you can feel the sherry cask

    From the internet: Pineapple chunks and white grapes. Hints of fresh coffee carry the earthy, subtly spicy peat. Toffee cubes. More light fruits (this time of the peach variety), with dark chocolate raisins and a whisper of red berries. Peat grows and grows, with a little black pepper too. juicy fresh rubber, fire charcoal, burnt branches juicy fresh rubber, fire charcoal, burnt branches

    Verdict: This is, as the more astute glib would guess, rather pricey, especially given the young age. I am not sure whether I should recommend this or not. It is good malt but rather pricey for such a young thing. Basically, it is if you are willing to pay some extra for the small new distillery on the block. But I do not feel cheated while drinking it.

     

    Bowmore left, Caol Ila right

    Caol Ila 12 bottled at 43%

    Color: quite light and pleasant, but not natural. Chill filtration was involved.

    Nose: herbal, grass, peaty, maybe a tad medicinal

    Taste: some smoke, some peat, vaguely salty, slightly acidic, alcohol has a slight roughness to it.

    Aftertaste: medium slightly spicy, faint peat, some vanilla

    From the internet: Vanilla pair brine tar toffee smoke ash Rubbed peppermint leaves,  damp grass, smoky. Oily, cigar leaves, smoked ham, hickory. Lemon peels at the harbor.Beautiful gentle salt spray on the coast, a smoldering fire. Beautiful honey sweetness, finest lemon sweet notes, a beautiful glow like a still burning out campfire, but without ashes, brown sugar, some thyme, of course, light salt, a little bit of white grapes,

     

    Bowmore 10 dark intense

    Bottled at 40%, chill filtered and a bunch of coloring added

    Color – dark, too dark for a 10-year-old. Dark and intense… dark due to all the coloring pour in, intense in the most meh of ways.

    Nose – starts faint but picks up fast, but for me not exactly pleasant. Some smoke but slightly disagreeable, some dry fruit

    Taste – caramel, faint peat, some sweetness

    Aftertaste – not overly complex

    From the internet: I can’t be arsed

    Verdict: Overall unimpressive for the price. I mean from this list this is the only one I would not recommend at all. it is OK and you can drink it, but at the price point, you can do a lot better. This is the kind I drink as the last drink of the night, when I want a bit of scotch, but I find drinking the good stuff is wasteful as I do not enjoy it fully.

     

    Islay Mist Delux

    This is basically a cheap blend of undetermined Islay malts of undetermined age, somewhat peaty Scotch with an overall good flavor.

    Nose: Vague smoke, herbal peat very discreet, barely there, some brine, something sweet

    Taste: Peat is there and some sweetness, but not overwhelming, smooth enough though there is a slight alcohol burn, vanilla maybe? neah.

    Aftertaste Surprisingly there is some there but no peat in it so kinda meh

    Verdict: if you want something drinkable with some peat and for a hair under 20$ Americanese Moneys it is not bad…

    Ranking:

    Ardbeg

    Lagavulin

    Kilchoman

    Laphroaig

    Caol Ila

    Islay Mist Delux

    Bowmore 10 dark intense

  • Because I’m Bad…

    I am not drinking beer this week but the cryptid captors required that I write about beer.  Those assholes gave me no leeway on this, and said that I didn’t want to end up like Swiss.  Honestly, it was either that or I had to defend Michael Jackson.  So they get nothing remarkable.

    This is my review of Northcoast Scrimshaw Pilsner.

    Let’s get something straight, I am not defending Michael Jackson.  If any of these allegations are true, then he is burning in Hell for all eternity.  That’s fine by me.

    The problem is, in his time the allegations turned out to have little empirical evidence.  This article here from NPR goes through a timeline of all of the allegations.  Ever single one failed to produce anything more than an allegation.  Some where the police investigated and found no physical evidence, another where the prosecution couldn’t move forward because one boy could not testify.  Even one from his sister La Toya that she eventually walked back.  He also had several come to his defense him from the allegations both then and now.

    Thankfully, this is a country where due process of law still matters, right? … Hey! …. Stop laughing!

    The problem here socially, is the attempt to silence Michael Jackson and remove him from the culture.  Here there is a lack of precedent.  One might point out R. Kelly was also accused of similar crimes, also acquitted, and radio stations are also not playing his music, effectively depriving him of his livelihood.  The difference here is scale.  R. Kelly made a couple songs a few of us can name off the top of our heads.

    Michael Jackon in the other hand, has the highest selling album of all time.  Thriller, released in 1982 sold over 100 million copies and counting. He has a unique ability to transcend time, and continues to influence artists even today.  Want an example?  Here’s Bruno Mars…Notice a resemblance?

    Can they really unperson somebody that big?  They‘re certainly going to try

    At the beginning of the year, I made the decision to no longer play songs by Michael Jackson during my DJ sets. I choose to believe that, in the wake of the HBOdocumentary “Leaving Neverland,” you cannot separate the art from the artist when it comes to using your public platform.

    I humbly disagree.  Its just music.  He might have been human garbage while he was alive, but he is dead.  He is not being punished, his kids are; as far as anyone knows, none of whom have committed a crime. His contributions to culture are immense enough to not have an analogue.  R. Kelly can’t say that.  A few banned authors ? Maybe but nobody is burning books.  The Roman Catholic church is arguably behind thousands of atrocities, but nobody is going to burn the Sistine Chapel or throw out the Gregorian calendar in response.  Too big perhaps?

    Perhaps the only analogue with as much cultural significance and the focus of naked censorship because of moral outrage is John Wayne.  But then, it doesn’t matter if either produced something that others can love within the context of their time, or within their art form.  Neither is allowed to influence culture anymore, because that culture no longer respects freedom of expression.  And that’s bad.

    What isn’t bad is Northcoast’s take on the Pilsner.  It is done competently, but unremarkably.  If a safe bet is what you are looking for, this is probably it.  Here’s another safe bet to go with it.  Northcoast Scrimshaw Pilsner:  3.5/5.

  • Pi Day Afternoon Links

    Not my best showing. It was not even a little bit good.

    Brett escaped his SMITH-family overlords only to be re-apprehended by his employer. If his comments on the meetings he’ll be in today are any indication, I suspect he’ll be returning to the… uh… “welcoming embrace” of the SMITHs before too long. Luckily for you all, my coworkers have been temporarily tamed by a tidal wave of sugar and fat thanks to my office’s 6th annual Pi Day (our first annual Pi Day was just me baking a shitty blueberry pie and telling everyone Pi Day was a thing). My ability to pie crust is significantly better and I’ve gotten weirder with my choices. Anyway, enough about my attempts to manipulate my coworkers with carbohydrates. To the news!

     

     

    And I suppose a wee bit of music goes here, no?

     

  • I’m on Vacation

    As the title says, I am not here.  Please do not attempt to contact me directly as I am most certainly out of the country.  I contacted the editors regarding my absence but was met with a response that was as predictable as it was unhelpful.

    While I will not explicitly inform you of my wherabouts, I’ll give a bit of a hint.  Unfortunately, I already wrote about an appropriate beer for this occasion so I will just go ahead and throw you all for a loop… this is my review of Jameson Caskmates Stout Edition.

    I know what you’re thinking, “that’s not beer, your wheelhouse is beer, and that looks like whiskey.”  Well…you’d be right, but who’s stopping me?

     

    Irish Whiskey has an interesting history.  It is said, the first written example of distillation occured during the 1st Century AD (or CE).  The Arabs are creditied with discovering the process as applied to perfumes, but the first known example was found in Alexandria.  Later during the 7th Century Irish monks trained in the process, applied it to create a drinkable spirit, called Uisce Beatha.  It is from this spirit, we ultimately get Whiskey.  Once again, leave it to the Irish to be at the forefront of drinking technology.

    Which means…Whiskey predates Whisky, sort of.  To explain, by the 18th Century Irish Whiskey was held in higher regard than its Scottish counterpart.  It was not until in 1820 that Irish Whiskey as we know it today came about.  The Single Pot style was developed in response to a tax levied by the English on malt.  The Irish distillers responded simply by using both unmalted barley and malted barley, resulting in a distinctive flavor.

    Over the next century Irish Whiskey fell out of favor for a variety of reasons:  Temperance movements in Ireland (seriously), potato famines, mass migrations, restrictions on exports to the rest of Britain, Irish Revolution, Irish Civil War, two world wars, prohibition in it’s largest customer (The United States), American servicemen stationed in England developing a taste for Scotch Whisky during the war, and the Scots developing the Coffey Still and the blended whisky that suited the palates of the day.

    Mostly, it was war and the government being bad for business.

    Irish distilleries began to add the “e” to differentiate themselves from the distilleries in Scotland.  At the time, Irish whiskey was more popular than Scotch, even in Scotland.  Americans simply adopted the spelling.  Hence my statement, whiskey predated whisky.

    So does it taste like beer?   No.  This tastes like whiskey.   By aging whiskey in old beer barrels rather than the other way around, they took a fun idea and turned it on its head.  I’m not even going to rate it, because its not beer of course, and rating it implies that whiskey is equivalent to beer.  Its not.  It is smooth however, and has an ever so slight chocolate notes.  I might have to try the IPA barrel next, just out of curiosity.

     

  • Hillbilly B’Day: Or Pop Imparts Wisdom

    Growing up in the foothills of North Carolina, I spent a good deal of time with my maternal grandparents.  Like many rural southern families the week revolved around church and the extended family having Sunday dinner together.  (For those that don’t know, dinner is lunch, and supper is dinner, and breakfast is any time you damn well feel like it.)  My grandparents were, to say the least, colorful characters.  They loved basketball, family, and God and I’m not sure in what order you would put that.  Known to me as Granny and Pop, I adored them.  They spoiled their grandchildren within their means, but mostly it was with food and indulgence.  Pop had a horse a friend stabled and he taught me to ride.  He, allegedly, was something of a star point guard in high school, but showboating in front of a scout and the outbreak of WWII left him unable to attend college.  He was a known by everyone in town and half the people in the county, and when he died 20 years ago, we were at the funeral home nearly 6 hours shaking hands with all the people who came to pay their respects.  By the time I knew him he was a mostly respectable pillar of the church.  But he had some wild moments in his past and one of those stayed with him.

    Behind his house was a large section of undeveloped woodland.  Though at the back of their property was a little dirt road not much more than a trail.  And the cool, inviting, mysterious woods always beckoned to us youngsters.  We were allowed down the road, but there was a path that broke off to the east that we weren’t allowed down.  All we knew was that The Camp was down there.  And while my Pop was a king of indulgence, he had a stern side, and it was clear that violating that rule would earn us a hidin’.  It was important and as the oldest and most adventurous of our passel of kids, I didn’t lead to any peremptory explorations, so the rule stayed inviolate.

    On my 16th birthday, however, Pop told me to come take a walk with him in the woods, which weren’t unusual.  We often did this.  But this walk was different.  We veered off toward The Camp.  I had gained enough wisdom to realize this was a momentous occasion, so I simply followed his lead.  By this time, he had a walking stick that he used for support, though he was grinnin’ his Cheshire cat grin, clearly looking forward to what was to come.

    We got to The Camp and one might think it was a bit disappointing.  A fire-pit, a bit of a clearing near the fast-flowing creek, and a couple of shed type buildings somewhat rudely constructed.  Until I saw the Still.  And then much became clear.  The Camp was where Pop and all his friends had their rig for making ‘shine.  After the war, he’d actually run ‘shine and was part of that whole culture, but by this time in the late 80’s he’d settled down and only made small batches for his friends and a few select others.  The other three or four guys I’d seen him around with were there.  Overalls and trucker hats were still de rigueur for these gents.  I was allowed to wander around a bit before Pop started teaching me a few things.

    Now, this is imparted wisdom from my grandfather and is still, sadly, illegal to do.  So fortunately the statute of limitations is over and even if they weren’t, it’s a bit hard to put a dead man in prison, though ‘the got damn revenuers’ would likely try anyway.  Good luck to them if they do.  You may have notice where I get some of my, shall we say lack of respect, for the law from.  I am merely carrying on the family tradition in that regard.

     

    Preparing the Wash

    He taught me that making delicious white lightning is an exercise in patience, as much art as science, and that it took, like many of the best things, time to do it right.  Distilling is in some ways easier than brewing beer, and in other wars more difficult.  Making the wash, at least the way Pop did it, was pretty bullet proof.  Really, you just wanted to use the yeast to make as much alcohol as possible.  Now, cause Pop believed that all moonshine was made from corn, you were also trying to get some of the unique fusels that can bring in the mix, but that happens naturally.  Before you can get to fermenting though, you have to prep things.  You needed your ingredients; corn, sugar, yeast, and water.

    As I said, only corn will do, and Pop was a little cavalier about what kind of corn, as he got it from the feed store.  He often went for a medium corn meal.  I imagine had it been available he’d have used something like https://www.bobsredmill.com/shop/gluten-free/gluten-free-medium-cornmeal.html instead. I don’t know if this is optimal, I just know that’s what he did, and it worked for him.  Anyway, once he had the cornmeal he’d pour in some hot water with the cornmeal and sugar and let that soak for a good day or two.  It didn’t have to stay hot, simply needed to be hot to dissolve the sugar.  Then let it soak.

    Next you’d put the yeast in some warm water. He told me he liked to keep it in that below 90 degree range as that was the right temperature for the type yeast he liked to wake up.  Yeast varies, of course, and some like higher or lower temperatures so I reckon that is going to depend.  Either way, he’d mix things in and add the yeast-water to the corn/sugar mix.  Then add even more warm water that had been heated over an open fire, then wrap things in old horse blankets and let it sit.  And since this is here the fermentation was happening, it would bubble and fart up a storm.  Like an old lady with a delicate stomach that had a spicy Mexican dish three meals running.

    I imagine, had the home brewing craze been on grandpas radar he’d have loved those,  fancy buckets with spigots on the bottom and airlocks on the top.  But he’d jury-rigged some old trash can with a hole in the lid, a tube through the hole, and the other end of the hose beneath some water in a different, smaller bucket.  And he’d let that go on for four or five days until it had stopped bubbling the water.

     

    Cookin’

    So that lesson done, it was the next week after dinner that we went out to learn to actually cook a batch of shine.  Now, a modern moonshiner would probably enjoy one of those fancy bags to put the corn in at the beginning, the ones with the fine mesh that lets water through just fine.  I suppose one would be able to simply lift the spent grains up and out and only really have to filter the dead yeast.  But Pop and his friends were dealing with a different eras techniques.  He had  multiple filters set up and would use gravity to drain it through.  We spent quite a bit of time pouring wash through cheesecloth of different grades until Pop was satisfied it was filtered well enough.

    Once that was done, we poured it into the copper pot still he had that sat on top of an out door propane burner.  He claimed they use to use wood-fueled fires, but I can’t imagine that shit.  Anyway, here’s a picture of a copper pot still for making distilled water that’s similar in design if not size to the one my Pop used.

    It’s actual distillation stage where the patience and artistry comes in. That liquid sitting in that pot is a mix of water, various alcohols and fusels.  Now, all those things have different boiling points.  Methanol burns off first.  You do not want to drink methanol. It’ll give you headaches and tastes like shit in low doses.  In higher doses it can cause blindness or even death.  Bad stuff that Methanol.  Interesting thing is though, the treatment for methanol poisoning?  Ethyl alcohol.  Apparently the receptors that grab methanol prefer our good friend ethyl and will let those molecules go in exchange.  Anyway, methanol starts evaporating around 150 degrees. So now is the time where you get busier than a one legged man in an ass-kicking contest.

    Once the pot was up to that temp, based on the gauge we had, Pop would start diverting water from the crick into the tun.  This cools the copper down and encourages the evaporated liquid to condense and run down the coils and out of the tun.  Pop would turn the heat back what he reckoned was a good piece; wanting it hot enough to continue heating the wash, but at a slower rate.  As about the time the pot hits 165 degrees, the methanol would have condensed and starts flowing out.  Some math comes in and there’s a formula for calculating exactly how much methanol will be produced per gallon of wash.  And it’s somewhere between .6 and .8 ounces per gallon.  Anyway, Pop was the type who tended to free-hand things and didn’t want to poison no one.  So he just figured for every gallon in the pot, he’d take 2x as many ounces from the beginning and dispose of it.   Usually it got just tossed in the ground.

    So once he was done with the Methanol, there’d be a tapering off and the temp would climb to the 175-180 degree mark.  That’s where the Ethanol is being produced and begins to flow. The heat would be turned down to the minimum at this point and the water should be flowing strong and cold over the condenser coils.   Again, if Pop were running a formal operation here, he might have gotten this down to a more detailed amount, but he’d collect a quarter of the expected run or so and set that aside, usually based on testing with his finger in the drip and getting a taste.  Those were the heads and they were higher proof, and didn’t taste as good.

    But now..now we’re into the Heart of the run and it should be the good stuff.  Sweet and cool right out of the tap and small little taste of heaven.  The pot would be sitting in that 176-178 degree range and the ethyl produced is about 10% of the total amount of the wash. (So a 5 gallon wash would make about a gallon run, with a quart of heads, two quarts of heart, and a quart of tails.)  This is what you want to keep.  And while a half a gallon doesn’t sound like much, that’s 130 proof sweet corn liquor and will go a ways.  Especially as grandpa ran much larger batches and he’d do several runs from spring into the summer.  More on what can be done with this later.

    As the temp hit 180 or so, the proof fell off, and again more fusels are included and he was into the tails of the run.  Usually this’d be about the same amount as the heads and would be combined with it.  If you ever had turpentine tasting moonshine, it’s usually some cheap asshole mixing his heads and tails into his heart run, or simply selling that outright. As you might imagine, Pop, being a man who took pride in his law breaking, had no truck with such foolishness.

     

    Afterwards

    The heads and tails would be poured into the next batch of wash to up the alcohol content and extend out the hearts.  Of course, with his experience at it, he could tell by dabbing his finger where things needed to change, as I mentioned.  And he showed me how that would work.  Again, it’s part of the art of it doing it this way. He’d also take the heart run and divide it up.  Some of it he’d mix with apple cider and put cinnamon sticks in.  Others spring or summer fruit and a bit of juice or water and put up to let it age.

    Once the pot had cooled, often he’d simply dump the leftover wash in there.  The heads and tails would get mixed into the next batch as I mentioned.  And the spent grains would be used by Granny to make some outstanding cornbread.  Fresh blackberry preserves on some moonshine spent grain cornbread that had just come out of the oven in a iron skillet was a consistent treat growing up.  And while both of them are gone now and have been for sometime, any time I find some moonshine and some cornbread, it is a chance to connect with them, and that wonderful spring twenty odd years ago.

  • Its that time of year (again)

    Like I mentioned before about a year ago, I give up beer for Lent.  I do it every year.  Not to worry, I’m not going to explain it again.  I am just going to leave a link here, explaining the whole thing.

    This is my review of Saison Dupont Avec Les Bons Vouex.

    If you’ve been following long enough, this is not to be confused with regular old, Saison Dupont…which I reviewed here.

    Incidentally, this one was even mentioned before.  Bon Voeux is a French phrase meaning, “best wishes.”  This beer was initially put to market during the 1970s and offered to the brewer’s most loyal customers.  Am offering of sorts, for best wishes for the new year.   I guess I am a bit late.

    The biggest difference with this one over the standard is it is quite a bit more intense with the citrus notes.  I might go so far as to say it has an almost lemon-like sourness.  Like Nephilium, I will have to say the standard is better.  Saison Dupont Avec Les Bons Voeux 3.5/5

    I drink a ton of Saison, don’t I?  Maybe I need to give it up for a while…

  • In defense of Brett

    A few months ago, it wasn’t easy for our friend Brett.  Due in no small part to the most outrageous of outrages, sparking an outrage amongst those most eager to be outraged.  Even people that were only coincidentally named Brett  were affected by the outrage.

    Now Kavanagh, a salesman, says he has to change his whole pitch following the Supreme Court nominee’s scandal.

    ‘The first thing I say is my name is Brett Kavanagh. And literally the first reactions is “Wait, what did you just say.” I have to stop and explain it’s been a crazy couple of weeks,’ he said.

    Some people are dumb…

    This is my review of Boulevard Saison Brett

    Should I have made this bigger? Just click the link…

    Brett doesn’t have to be bad, and nobody should ever put you down just because you are named Brett…or are a cokehead.  There a many famous Bretts out there, and the list get even bigger when you remove a T.  Which means there is nothing to be ashamed of.  Especially since so many of them are athletes, country singers, and 80’s hair metal icons. Plus, the one at the top is known for sending pictures of his junk to this chick.

    Lets be real though, the name reference has absolutely nothing to do with Brett.  Sorry brah.  It has more to do with this.

     

    Which is a a difficult type of yeast to work with, given it is a “wild” strain and you don’t really know what you will wind up with.

    • Brettanomyces (aka “Brett”): A strain of yeast, not a bacteria, that Dawson refers to as “the wunderkind of the wild beer world.” It serves the same function as saccharomyces does: fermenting beer. But Brett works more slowly, meaning a beer that could have fermented within days or weeks with saccharomyces will take weeks, months or even years to display its full character when Brett is used. Dawson rephrases a quote from the late beer author Michael Jackson: “Saccharomyces is like a dog and Brett is like a cat. It’s a little less predictable. It’s going to do its own thing; it’s not going to come when you call it and sit when you say sit. If you can respect its individuality and suggest rather than dictate what it does in your fermentation, it can reward the brewer and the drinker.” There are different strains of Brett, each of which produces its own flavors ranging from tropical pineapple and fruity peach to the intense flavors described as sweaty horse blanket, dirt, earth and barnyard. TL;DR:Brett is the microbe responsible for funk.

    So what was the result?  In this case it was actually pretty special.  So much so that I bought it a second time…

    …which is truly saying something because I had to get these things at Whole Foods, and find inventive ways to justify why I am giving Jeff Bezos $15 for a single bottle of beer.  Its that good. Get it before it’s gone.  Boulevard Saison Brett:  4.2/5.

  • Mmmmm…Beeeerrrr

    Or, “How Nephilium Popped My (beer) Cherry”.

    So with all the posts by Nephilium and Kinnath, I decided to dip my toe into the beer making hobby. I don’t drink the quantities I used to (not a bad thing), so I opted to follow Nephi’s advice and go with nano brew kits from Brooklyn Brew Shop. The kit with brewing supplies was just under $60 but I will be making many batches with it. The recipe kits run about $16.

    Okay, before you IPA haters jump on your soapbox(and not a peep out of you, Ted), I chose single hop IPAs for a reason. I wanted to learn about the flavor and aroma profiles of the different hops. So there.

    Anyways, the kit comes with pretty much everything you need. Grains, hops, yeast, sanitizer. For the process, it has a gallon jug, an airlock, thermometer, plastic tubing, and a racking cane. Since I made this batch, I’ve added a beer hydrometer and grain bags(you’ll see why). Everything else I needed I had on hand.

    First off, everything gets sanitized. The instructions direct you to mix half the sanitizer with a gallon of water, the rest will be used during the bottling process. I’ve done a couple of modifications that I think make the process easier for me. I weighed the sanitizer and now I mix up a quart and also have a small spray bottle filled with sanitizer. It really made my life easier.

    After that, comes the mash in. It takes an hour, and you have to keep track of the temperature. It needs to stay between 144-152 degrees, with it being stirred every so often. You’re basically making oatmeal here. You don’t use the whole amount of water. There’s a pot of water at the right temperature waiting to be added later. You also need an extra pot because the “wort” that’s created by steeping the grains gets poured over the grains twice.

    So after an hour, “mashing in” is done. You raise the temperature to 170 degrees and strain into another pot. The liquid and additional four quarts of 170-degree water get poured over the grain twice.

    As you can see from the photo, this is why I went to grain bags. I made a bit of a mess.

    Next, we go to the boil. For this particular kit, it’s a 60 minute boil with hops added at specific times based on the recipe. Once the boil foams, you reduce to heat to a point where it’s just boiling, and start the process. I used the digital scale I use for charcuterie for weighing out the hops.

    You lose 20% of volume during the boil, which leaves you a gallon of wort. Cool it on ice to 70 degrees and into the jug. I added a hydrometer to my supplies because this is what tells you if you achieved the specific gravity(sugar content) the wort needs to ferment to the proper alcohol level. This is also where you add the yeast(“pitch”) and shake to mix and add oxygen.

    The sanitized tubing is stuck through the cap about an inch, and the other end sits in a bowl of sanitizer. The first couple of days is where the most aggressive fermentation takes place, and the airlock isn’t up to the task. After a couple of days, the tubing is replaced with the airlock, and then it’s time to wait for two weeks while fermentation does its thing. I’m using the guest bedroom closet that doubles as my “root cellar”. Close the vents and it stays a consistent 60 degrees during the winter.

    The other purpose for the hydrometer is the determine if the beer has reached the proper alcohol level. I didn’t have one for this batch, so I crossed my fingers and hoped the recipe was correct.

    At this point, the fermented beer is siphoned out of the jug and into a pot containing a half cup of water and three tablespoons of honey. The beer is flat, so this is the sugar that will ferment and provide carbonation. The beer is siphoned into sanitized bottles and placed back into the cool, dark closet for two weeks. I screwed up and lost my prime towards the end, so I ended up with six pints, instead of seven.

    After two weeks, it’s time to chill, pour, and see if I made something actually worth drinking.

    Hey! That ain’t half bad. Citrus notes from the Cascade hops, creamy mouthfeel with just a little bitterness on the finish and just the slightest hint of residual sweetness that will probably go away over time.

    I’m enjoying this hobby, so far. It’s not saving me any money and given that we’re in the Golden Age of craft brewing, it’s not like I can’t find dozens of awesome beers at the local grocery store. I chalk it up to my toddler “me do it!” mentality. It goes well with gardening, canning, charcuterie, etc. The second single hop IPA is in the closet and I have a Cream Ale cold fermenting in the bar refrigerator. Next up is a batch of raspberry mead from the recipe Kinnath posted. When Spring comes, other things will take place of brewing to keep me busy, but when it’s like this outside, might as well make beer!

  • Super Bowl Controversy

    One Sunday, I took it upon myself to create a set of links I believe were worthy of discussion amongst those otherwise uninterested in a prominent sporting event that occurred that day.  Predictably, most of you decided it was better to discuss the sporting event anyway.  Which brought on this brief moment of inspiration, brought on by a silly commercial.

    This prompted me to research what the big deal was.  While I provided an answer, the gentleman asking didn’t seem to appreciate it as such.

    This is my review of Oskar Blues Dale’s Pale Ale

    Adjuncts are ingredient used in the wort to create an environment the yeast can easily metabolize.  Most people subscribe to the idea the German Reinheitsgebot created the perfect balance with the four allowed ingredients.  For good reason:  German beer is typically pretty good.  Adding an adjunct however, does not have to be a bad thing.

    It is fashionable among homebrewers to dismiss adjuncts as unworthy ingredients in beer. They often cite the German “Reinheitsgebot,” a purity law promulgated in 1516 that allowed only the use of water, malted barley and hops. Yet adjuncts are viewed differently around the world. Köln and Brussels are both world-famous brewing centers. Although located within 165 miles of each other, the brewing philosophies of these cities are light years apart. While German brewers were restricted for centuries by the Reinheitsgebot, Belgian brewers have long obtained fermentables from a wide variety of sources. In fact, adjuncts play a role in some of the world’s great beer styles.

    […]

    Adjuncts can be divided into two broad groups: kettle adjuncts and mashable adjuncts. Kettle adjuncts, like honey or candi sugar, contain fermentable sugar and are added to the kettle in the boil. Mashable adjuncts contain starch. This starch needs to be converted to sugar before it can be used by brewer’s yeast. These starchy adjuncts must be mashed, which means that enzymes degrade the starch to fermentable and unfermentable sugars and dextrins.

    Most adjuncts — including rice, corn and kettle sugars — contain very little protein and they are reluctant to yield the protein they do have during mashing. So they also can be considered in terms of their ability to dilute the protein in a wort made from low-protein adjuncts and malted barley. All the protein in this wort comes from the barley, so adding a source of extract that carries no protein effectively dilutes the total protein in the wort. Protein in barley can cause haze. People generally prefer beers to be crystal clear and they expect that clarity to last for months. So by diluting protein with the proper amount of adjuncts, brewers can increase clarity and stave off the onset of chill haze.

    Fuck off slaver!

    In other words, there is probably a pretty good reason to use an adjunct.  Don’t dismiss a beer offhand just because it does not conform to the Reinheitsgebot.  A good example is The Samurai from Great Divide, which uses rice as its source of malt.  It’s been a few years since I had it while I was stationed in Colorado, but from what I remember it is actually quite good.

    The adjuct in question however, is the use of corn syrup.  First, in my personal opinion, high fructose corn syrup is not necessarily any worse for you than any other sugar—in fact high fructose corn syrup is defined as a sugar that is half fructose and half glucose…this dissacaride is known as sucrose—which is a fancy name for table sugar.  The problem is most people eat a shit load of sugar, regardless of the type of sugar in question.

    Warty is going to kick my ass…

    That said, the use of corn based sugar is not a new thing at all.  In fact many brewers in the United States began using it around World War II for a variety if reasons, but rationing was the rationale behind using it, and the reason why they continue to use it is obvious…people buy it!

    When Miller & Coors first started using corn they used simple flaked corn which adds a wonderful perceivable sweet cornbread-like flavor while continuing to dry out the beer, like Batch 19. Anheuser-Busch wanted to stand out and try something lighter so they went with rice, which can have a slight diacetyl and acetaldehyde flavor but for the most part keeps the same ABV content but imparts, again, a dryness and lower color.”

    The rest, as they say, is history.

    “A-B’s new light beer or reformulated Budweiser sold like mad! A lighter more thirst quenching lager that people could drink all day made people go crazy for the stuff,” said Kelly. “With the success of AB’s beer Miller started making their beer lighter and the watering down war began its vicious battle until they both started using enzymes to lower the final gravity. [Then] the zombie war of calories took over bringing an end to caring about the best tasting beer and a beginning to MGD 64 and Bud 55.”

    It’s not hard to see why corn doesn’t get much respect amongst the brewing community[…].

    The fact several craft brewers use adjuncts, including corn, should be enough reason not to freak out over corn syrup in your beer.  This is just a marketing ploy designed to entice the faux-health nuts into buying Bud Light over Coors Light…if you don’t like it…don’t buy it.  I personally can’t stand either, which brings us back to the beer in question.

    Dale’s Pale Ale is a standard American Pale Ale.  Oskar Blues has a wide enough distribution most people can find it on the same shelf as the dilly dilly beer in question but does so in a manner that I am under no delusion I am being healthy by drinking it.  Its cheap, it’s tasty, it does the job.  Oskar Blues Dale’s Pale Ale:  3.5/5