Monday Morning Factory Irregular Links

Banjos has been a bit tightly strung recently, and has been a bit sharp, so the staff is all trying to even out her temper. But don’t fret, there will still be links. And a special Happy Birthday callout to Banjos’s hero and personal role-model, Rachel Maddow. Fittingly, it’s also the birthday of Phil “Knucksie” Niekro; everyone’s favorite yeoman, Grace Lee Whitney; and the only person who could actually wear a man-bun without looking imbecilic, Toshiro Mifune.

On to the news!


 

I see Joe Biden’s future here.

 

Scrambling like Fran Tarkenton.

 

Picks up a a blocker!

 

Trump supporters (which they have to be, right?) as antisemites. And TBH, I’m rather sympathetic.

 

Why do I think this will make absolutely zero difference?

 

Unasked question: Why is either of these any concern of “lawmakers?” /searches constitution for the invisible ink part

 

“What the congresswoman meant was…”

 

“What the congresswoman meant was…”

 

Coyote, anvil, tunnel paint, JATO rockets…

 

Awww, they’re so adorable. And Greta looks like she just ran in the Special Olympics. Give her a hug!

 

The story does not live up to the headline.

 


 

OK, I admit it, this guy’s music just knocks me out. Cross roots and Rahsaan and you have Matt Lorenz.

 

Comments

493 responses to “Monday Morning Factory Irregular Links”

  1. blackjack

    first?

    1. I think the reason the informal requirements of having to comment on something from the links was to avoid having people drop a ‘First’ or other such remark in a bid for that spot. (Note, I would not regard my comment to qualify under said rules either)

      1. blackjack

        Yeah, I just meant the date. Today is the first. It’s kinda like Turette’s.

        1. bacon-magic

          Got ’em.

      2. Tonio

        Lighten up, Francis.

  2. No April Fool’s Style linkage?

    1. Old Man With Candy

      I blew my wad on that one last year with my “All Rickroll” links post.

    2. leon

      I thought AOC had the jokes.

      1. I thought AOC was the joke.

        1. AlexinCT

          You won the interenets.

    3. Everyone’s life is just a gigantic cosmic joke. Enjoy!

      1. leon

        I don’t want to start any blasphemous rumors…

    4. Nephilium

      I can’t believe I’m going to say this, but can more tech companies act like Microsoft for once?

  3. leon

    “Banjos’s hero and personal role-model, Rachel Maddow. ”

    : Quiet Gasp, looks at rest of commentariat:

    1. Leon, I suspect he was joking.

      1. leon

        Some jokes go too far.

        1. Tonio

          [wet willie’s leon]

          April Fools!

      2. Old Man With Candy

        No, she really does love Maddow. Has a framed autographed photo in the living room. Sloopy admitted that he fantasizes about her when they’re banging, so Banjos thinks of Maddow as a hero AND a marital aid.

        1. Slammer

          Geez, I hope he doesn’t grab her by the hair and smash her head repeatedly into the headboard

          1. Sean

            *slowly backs out of thread*

          2. Slammer

            Have cephalopod, will travel

        2. Cy

          “Banjos thinks of Maddow as a hero AND a marital aid.”

          So…. he’s really into double ended dildos?

          1. Atanarjuat

            Maybe thoughts of Maddow keep him from finishing too quick.

          2. “Lie back and think of Lawrence O’Donnell”

          3. Not Adahn

            Sloopy is AuH20?

        3. Pope Jimbo

          I’d be worried about the possibility of birth defects caused by thinking of Maddow when the kid was conceived.

          1. Not Adahn

            The Nature of Monsters was a pretty good book.

    2. a special Happy Birthday callout to … Rachel Maddow.

      Wait, Rachel is quite literally an April Fool?

    3. bacon-magic

      *hides in bunker til fallout
      I for one believe wholeheartedly that Banjos can knock that dude Maddow the fuck out.

  4. Rebel Scum

    Dear Beloved Reader, we’re going to be real with you. We’re asking you to join our membership program so we can become fully financially sustainable (and you get some cool perks too!) With plummeting ad rates across the media industry, we’re at an urgent risk of shutting down. And we don’t want you to face Trump and his kind without the unique resources we provide. If everyone reading this only gave $12, we could raise enough money for the entire year in just one day. For the price of a single lunch out, you can help save us. We’re an independent feminist media site, led entirely by people of color, and that pays everyone who writes for us. If Everyday Feminism has been useful to you, please take one minute to keep us publishing the articles you’ve come to rely on us for. Thank you!

    They seem kind of needy.

    1. I thought they were alread bankrupt. Why not just fire your remaining journalists activists and close the doors?

      1. AlexinCT

        Cause there are still plenty of idiots willing to part with their money when these asshats ask for it?

    2. “led entirely by people of color”

      Everyone knows them evil wyt divvils perceive reality through false consciousness and are therefore incapable of reporting on anything.

      (not that what they do is reporting)

    3. leon

      Women, always trying to Burrow in and bleed you dry…

      : Ducks:

    4. Rasilio

      Maybe they should have a bake sale

      1. blackjack

        Learn to code?

    5. Count Potato

      “and that pays everyone who writes for us”

      No, they don’t.

    6. Enough About Palin

      $12.00 = shitty lunch

  5. Rebel Scum

    Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. scrambled on Sunday to contain a quickly growing crisis for his likely presidential bid, putting forward several former female aides and allies to praise his treatment of women

    There are montages of all of his creepiness towards women. I don’t see what he expects to gain.

    1. Atanarjuat

      He gave a “men are evil” speech the other day, as if that would suffice. This election season might be the most hilarious ever.

      1. If you wanna be a white Dem politician, number one skill on your resume better be self-immolation.

  6. Slammer

    Does Maxine Waters speak english? I can’t quite tell. She’s like a ghetto Agile Cyborg

    1. Cy

      That wasn’t very kind.

      1. leon

        I can at least get Agiles intent. Maxine sounds like an Alien who is just spouting sounds that make it look like she knows English to other aliens.

        1. WTF

          “Peach 45!”

          1. Oh, I see, she was a fruit-counting robot taken out of service because she never recognized the 46th peach.

          2. Slammer

            BEACH LAWTY GLIVE

          3. If you wanna hit triple digits, you really need to pick up the pace.

            Those peaches ain’t gonna eat themselves.

    2. Tonio

      But, she may have dropped something big – NYT earlier claim was that the full Mueller report was around 300 pages; Waters gave a figure ten times that large, 3,000 – 4,000 pages. This is going to be interesting.

      1. leon

        Today is the day all the politicians try to work out their gaffes.

      2. AlexinCT

        Maybe she also has what Pelosi has…

    3. Drake

      I think of her as an older, dumber, uglier Aunt Esther.

      1. Enough About Palin

        I, for one, am thankful that I don’t have to live in a world without Sanford & Son video clips on YouTube.

        1. Tundra

          +1

          Top five TV theme song, too.

  7. Mammary Monday shimmies, shakes and bursts forth with bountiful bosoms.

    http://archive.li/feCLG

    Ignore the ridiculously transparent Fyre Festival 2 April Fools’ Day nonsense.

    1, 7L, 9, 15, 22.

    1. Slammer

      It’s April First I’m hesitant to click

      1. Rebel Scum

        Seconded. But I can’t look at these at work anyway.

      2. Satisfaction guaranteed.

        1. Not Adahn

          Maybe, but who’s satisfaction?

  8. leon

    District judge rules President can bind future presidents.

    IANAL, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the district Court really flubbed on this one. But that’s what happens when your suit gets brought to the ‘i can do what I want’ circuit. I don’t see the 9th overturning it.

      1. The president can’t legislate by executive order, and regardless of Barry’s “Intent”, his Authority doesn’t extend past the inauguration of Donald. What can be done by executive order can be undone by executive order. You want to make it so only legislation can undo it, you need to get legislation to do it.

        This ruling won’t survive SCOTUS.

        1. You seem to be operating under the incorrect assumption that the Constitution still matters.

        2. Cy

          It was a bullshit #resist power grab. Don’t worry, there won’t be an repercussions for the judge’s actions.

          1. leon

            Well they gave themselves Absolute Immunity.

            I’m sure she’s on Betos short list for SCOTUS appointments.

          2. Tonio

            They serve lifetime appointments and can only be removed through congressional impeachment.

          3. Nephilium

            Which really should happen more often.

          4. leon

            This seems like a prime case. A judge usurping Congress authority and giving it to the executive…

            Haha who am I kidding.

          5. Nephilium

            leon,

            I’d probably go one simpler, if you’re a judge, and you have a decision overturned by the Supreme Court unanimously, it starts the ball rolling on impeachment.

          6. Gustave Lytton

            Let’s not from forget who makes up Congress.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcee_Hastings

        3. WTF

          It is quite horrifying though how blatantly they are willing to ignore the constitution and the law to just do what they want. They don’t even pretend anymore.

          1. What part of “by any means necessary” don’t you understand?

          2. WTF

            This shit is what the second amendment was actually intended to address.

          3. Which also explains whey they’re so desperate to render it meaningless.

          4. AlexinCT

            Exactly. Whatever restraint they might still show on rare occasions is not because they realize what they are doing is unconstitutional and bordering on criminal, but that the people they still have not managed to disarm might some day say “enough is enough” and get them for shitting all over the people’s rights.

          5. Rebel Scum

            “He made his law. Now let him enforce it.”

          6. Democratic Hitler

            It’s so awful how Trump is violating all our sacred norms!

    1. leon

      I guess it’s a win either way for Trump. If the case is overturned, he wins. If not, he now has the power to create binding law, not just policy. Indefinitely constrain his successors from doing something.

      1. That’s different because ORANGEMANBAD.

        1. AlexinCT

          Yeah, I have a feeling that this judge would overrule her own rulings if someone brought a cause against orange man’s ruling …

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      “The wording of President Obama’s 2015 and 2016 withdrawals indicates that he intended them to extend indefinitely, and therefore be revocable only by an act of Congress,” said Gleason, who was nominated to the bench by Obama.

      Good, send it to the SC and end this discussion forever.

      What a bunch of bullshit.

      1. Rebel Scum

        The wording of President Obama’s

        Irrelevant. What is done by E.O. can be undone by E.O. If Trump wanted to he could undo any and all that have been made up to the founding of the country.

  9. Rebel Scum

    searches constitution for the invisible ink part

    It’s the FYTW clause written on the back in invisible ink that responds to citric acid and heat.

    1. ChipsnSalsa

      I thought it was uric acid that revealed the FYTW clause.

  10. LJW

    Mosquitoes don’t like dubstep: Insects that are ‘entertained’ with tune by artist Skrillex are less likely to hang around to bite people, scientists find

    That’s funny in a recent study I did on myself, not only does dubstep kill my sex drive, it makes me want to kill myself.

    1. Slammer

      It makes me want to kill the people who make dubstep

    2. leon

      Woa woa woa WAHHH!

  11. Cy

    I wish I could’ve walked out of school ‘striking’ for stupid make believe shit when I was in High school. Kind of like the modern ‘college classes,’ it just too easy now.

    1. leon

      Me too. I mean I could have, but would have been marked Truant, and missed credit, because it would have been something teachers don’t support. Kids these days don’t even know how to fight the man properly.

      1. Cy

        Fight the man? They’re on there knees in front of him and they’re doing it with smiles on their faces. This shit is disturbing.

        1. Cy

          *their

  12. While the PrEP stuff is good, I’d prefer there to be a vaccine.

    https://www.philly.com/health/san-francisco-could-become-first-us-city-eliminate-new-hiv-infections-20190331.html

    Also: the homeless chick with HIV, diabetes and stage 4 cervical cancer? I fail to understand how that relates in any way to publicly funded HIV programs; sounds to me like HIV is the least of her worries.

    1. I’m more surprised she’s not dead already.

      1. Not Adahn

        It is impressive surviving with all of that. Hopefully she had some kids to pass on those genes.

  13. Rebel Scum

    “This president has defined himself as a liar. He has committed over 8,000 lies in two years.

    Whereas Auntie Maxine is the bearer of truth.

    1. AlexinCT

      That idiot wouldn’t know the truth if it bit her in the ass.

  14. TW: Vox

    Adolf Hitler was not a socialist

    There are many, many, many things wrong with Rep. Brooks’s and Rep. Gohmer’s understanding of Nazism, from a basic misunderstanding of Nazism and Nazi ideology to what I term the ‘Americanization’ of Nazism: an effort to put Nazi Germany somewhere on the American political axis, where it very much does not belong.

    But one of their core assumptions — “Nazis were socialists” — has become one of the biggest memes within a swath of the American Right. And it is woefully, almost hilariously incorrect.

    1. leon

      “put Nazi Germany somewhere on the American political axis, where it very much does not belong”

      You know who else wanted to put Nazis on the American political axis…

      1. WTF

        Vox?

      2. l0b0t

        George Lincoln Rockwell?

      3. bacon-magic

        Volkswagen?

    2. Rebel Scum

      Yes he and the Nazi’s were, period.

      The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all. Consequently, we demand:
      Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.

      In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

      We demand the nationalisation of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).

      We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

      We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.

      We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.

      We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.

      We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

      We demand substitution of a German common law in place of the Roman Law serving a materialistic world-order.

      The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the state must be striven for by the school [Staatsbürgerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the state of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.

      The state is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.

      1. AlexinCT

        The fact that these people that like the idea of making government pick the winners and the losers are hell bent on pretending Hitler was not amongst the first people to adopt that idea on the collectivist march as a political system, is just sad. There was nothing “right-wing” about Hitler, and people didn’t start peddling that shit until the marxist defined his brand of collectivism as nationalistic, and thus, because if was not full blown communism, not left-wing and him evil.

        Reality is that Hitler’s political movement was yet another one of the many flavors of collectivism, and like all collectivism, destroyed and killed those that got in the way of the people that peddled a new power pyramid to the masses driven by envy and jealousy as the solution to all ills.

      2. Psycho Effer

        Remove the references to Germany and re-post it on Vox and watch all the progs use it as the basis of the next iteration of the Green New Deal.

        1. WTF

          Yup, and don’t forget to replace references to “the Jews” with references to “the 1%”.

          1. This is actually a fantastic idea.

      3. Democratic Hitler

        Damn, that is some excellent reference material RS. I agree with the others, a couple minor word substitutions in this and it turns into something that AOC and Bernie tweet on a daily basis.

    3. leon

      “And it is woefully, almost hilariously incorrect”

      I see this asserted, and while they had “conservative” social policies, I’ve never had anyone explain why the Nazi party platform mirrors the socialists.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        The Nazi’s were collectivist scum. The Communists were/are collectivist scum. The Socialists were/are collectivist scum.

        They all agree on the basic fundamentals of economic behavior and the necessity of the State to run the economy for the “benefit” of the People. They only really disagree on the method of inspiring the people to go along with it.

      2. A Leap at the Wheel

        The error is that most people equate socialism with Marxims. However, Marxism is a subset of socialism. Hell, the Levelers were socialist hundreds of years be Marx was born.

        So while Nazi’s were socialist, they were *not* Marxist. Marxist believe a whole slew of stupid shit beyond just state ownership and/or direction of industry. They have very strong opinions about things like the role of religion, gender relations, and the way to interpret primary historical documents that have nothing to do with wealth distribution. The Nazis also had very strong opinions on the role of religion, gender relations, and the way to interpret primary historical documents that were directly at odds with the way the Marxists saw it.

        Nazism, Communism/Marxims, and Liberalism are all the opposites of each other. Kind of like how love is the opposite of hate, hate is the opposite of apathy, and apathy is the opposite of love, Nazism is the opposite of Communism, Communism is the opposite of Liberalism, and Liberalism is the opposite of Nazism.

        TLDR – The single axis model of political ideology makes you stupid.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder

      You know who else believed in the Big Lie?

      The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.

      1. ChipsnSalsa

        Every national leader ever?

    5. Suthenboy

      So the national socialists called themselves socialists and had socialist policies but they were…..what? State capitalists?
      Sounds legit.

      1. WTF

        Well, the Nazis were bad, and socialism is good, so the Nazis couldn’t have been socialists! QED!!
        Don’t you even logic, bro?!

      2. Psycho Effer

        Let me lay it out for you…

        Capitalism = whatever economic system people try that has a bad outcome, especially when it’s actual socialism

        Socialism = it’s never actually been tried, but would be totes awesome if we can just get the right people in charge!

    6. Rufus the Monocled

      Not that bad an article but I think she’s pushing it. Her closing, at least, challenges the ‘Trump is Hitler’ narrative which has to be appreciated.

      The bottom line is Nazism falls on the left side of the political spectrum. It’s to the ‘right’ of Marxism/socialism. Nazism (which is German for fascism according to Hitler she seems to argue I guess) and Fascism were invented by two dictators one of whom was a hard core socialist (Mussolini). The Nazis as a party definitely were socialist and I think she realizes that. She’s saying Hitler wasn’t but the party was. I could be wrong.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Authoritarian left and right. They only really differ in their propaganda.

        1. Breet Pharara

          “We” need to come together to fight off the oppressive force. Either the rich keeping the workers who produce the actual wealth down or those outside the state and a few (((other))) groups. Everything is the same except the enemy.

  15. RE: (((Anti-vaxxers)))

    I do find the subtle implication that those avoiding the Orthos must be anti-Semite Trumpistas highly amusing considering 2 facts:

    1. Rockland county has gone Blue in 6 out of the last 7 presidential elections.
    2. The Orthos are waaaaaaay more likely to be voting Republican than the average wokified suburban NY WASP.

    1. Old Man With Candy

      Note the photos in the article of the avoiders…

    2. Not Adahn

      There is another site that I go to when I want to hate all of humanity. It’s filled with fartsniffing exemplars of intellectualism. And of all the (((cultural))) NYers there HHAAAAATE Kirias Joel and Sandy Springs.

  16. Rebel Scum

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., might want to brush up on some history after asserting, incorrectly, that Republicans in Congress amended the Constitution to kick President Franklin Delano Roosevelt out of office.

    “They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get reelected,” Ocasio-Cortez said Friday during a night hall event with MSNBC with Chris Hayes.

    Christ, what a dangerously ignorant asshole. The constitution was changed because FDR was the first president to not follow Washington’s example and step down after two terms. (and FDR was a tyrant.)

    1. leon

      IIRC U.S Grant was the first to run for a third term. FDR was second and only successful one.

      1. Rebel Scum

        Learn something new every day.

      2. Raven Nation

        Hmm, I’m not sure that’s correct. Grant considered running but declined to do so some time before the Republican convention of 1876.

        1. Rebel Scum

          You guys need to make up my mind here.

        2. leon

          Your right. Grant wanted to but wasn’t nominated. Teddy is the only other to have run in a General Election for a third term (as Bull Moose Part candidate)

          1. Raven Nation

            And, one more twist: Grant actually had the most delegates in 1880 but was short of a majority. In the end, all the anti-Grant candidates combined to nominate Garfield. So, there’s little doubt that Grant would have run for a third term if nominated. IOW, he did not want to respect Washington’s precedent.

          2. The Last American Hero

            So if he had won a third term, they would have amended the Constitution earlier and St FDR would be just another 2 term douche?

    2. Drake

      If only there were portable or handheld devices that could be used to look up historical events…

    3. Suthenboy

      (and FDR was a tyrant.)

      Thus the left’s reverence for him.

  17. RE: Congressional sex committee.

    I thought they already had slush funds for whores and/or paying off sexually harassed interns? Whycome we need a committee now?

    1. Cy

      I think that’s the joke.

      “Congressional sex committee.”

      Aren’t they all?

      1. Tonio

        “Ewwwww….” [furiously scribbles notes for forthcoming fiction]

  18. Our Toxic-Speech Epidemic
    Trump likes his words free, loud, and hateful. Just don’t take him literally.

    When Breitbart asked Donald Trump about his recent executive order to “protect” speech on college campuses, the president gave a wandering reply that included something of a threat: “I can tell you, I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump—I have the tough people, but they don’t play it tough until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad.”

    Most glaringly, Trump bragged about his de facto backup crew just days before a heavily armed gunman killed 50 Muslims in New Zealand and cited the US president as a “symbol of renewed white identity” (albeit just “one time,” as Trump aide Kellyanne Conway noted helpfully). Obviously, a politician’s words don’t necessarily make him liable for the acts of all his admirers. But the issue is not about proving a direct causation between Trump’s speech and the violence it inspires. It is just as worrying that there is a US president who so relentlessly dehumanizes, infantilizes, hypersexualizes, pathologizes, and criminalizes. Trump is not Hitler, but the rhetoric he employs isn’t that far off. Hitler wrote that Jews were a “poison” to national bodies, causing “a ferment of decomposition” among peoples and races that renders them, in the broader sense, “a dissolver of human culture.” Trump and many of his appointees have reinvigorated such sentiments with a caustic new life, applying them to everyone from Mexicans to Muslims to Democrats to dead war heroes: low-IQ, lowlife, parasitic, worst-of-the-worst, scummy, wussy, disgraceful, ugly, fat-faced, coddled, vicious, animal, raping, drug-dealing, a bad-very-bad subhuman invasion.

    1. Rebel Scum

      dead war heroes

      Uh huh…

    2. The English language deserves an apology from that person.

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      Not Hitler but Hitler.

      You can’t be a Quasi-Hitler either.

    4. Rufus the Monocled

      I look forward to the comments when the genius horde who pay for that crap begin to show up.

    5. Rufus the Monocled

      Hang on. He says stupid things but don’t take him literally but then write as if he’s literal?

      I don’t follow.

      1. AlexinCT

        Don’t try to assume he is a moron and you will be good.

    6. Cue the U Missouri professor calling for some muscle….

  19. Rufus the Monocled

    You know, I don’t think that imbecile from the Bronx gives a hoot about being factually wrong.

    1. AlexinCT

      Progressives believe reality and truth are objective, and they can thus make it be whatever they want. I wish we would encourage them to do more of that and removed their safety nets. Darwin awards would become far more difficult to issue as a large swath of these morons would succumb to mother nature’s brutal way of dealing with stupid.

  20. Rufus the Monocled

    Notice the sign in the article about the teens protesting.

    It’s not the first time I see it. I think that’s the whole point of climate change. System change.

    1. Suthenboy

      Of course it is the point. That’s why they are called watermelons.

      1. AlexinCT

        If they really believed the shit they peddle, we would have them demanding this happen. But they want nothing to do with that, because the ONLY solution they want is to upend the status quo and replace it with another tyrannical marxist system.

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          It’s not about that at all. When they see that they see their chance to control things – and the gravy train that comes with it – evaporate.

    2. AlexinCT

      It is about the people that hate the fact they lack power, and figure this new green bullshit will allow them to upend the existing power pyramid and then somehow allow them to end up at the top of the new one along with whatever friends they favor. It’s an old story repackaged using the “Saving Gaia” flag to provide it the veneer of legitimacy.

  21. robc

    In 1979 Phil Niekro went 21-20.

    Modern pitchers are pussies.

    He finished 6th in the Cy Young voting with 20 losses. Atlanta went 66-94, so the losses probably weren’t on him.

    1. Spartacus

      The 70’s Braves were a team that could score 6-7 runs a game and still lose consistently. So I think that at least some blame can be put on the pitching.
      The knuckleball is great when it’s breaking like it’s supposed to. When it’s not, you just serve up a bunch of big fat taters.

  22. TW: The Guardian

    Jeremy Corbyn needs to get behind the people’s vote to fight the far right
    A second vote is the only way to confront head-on the bigotry and racism unleashed by Brexit

    hese Labour MPs and campaigners are not ignoring the toxicity of a second vote, the racist foghorn it would unleash or the upsurge in racist abuse that could follow. They just appraise another vote as the best (or least worst) way of facing down the prejudice and bigotry that Brexit unleashed – and of facing down this rightwing, free-market fundamentalist project altogether.

    Some say that, whatever happens next, the far right is already emboldened. It feeds off victory, as it did when hate crime spiked after the first referendum. And it is fuelled by betrayal narratives, currently applied to soft Brexit, to Theresa May’s Brexit and to no Brexit at all. Hope not Hate activists report that, after years of canvassing in Ukip and BNP-supporting areas, they are taken aback by the open racism currently on display in leave constituencies.

    1. So just to make sure I’m keeping up:

      – Voting for independence from unelected corrupt bureaucrats = bigotry
      – Overt anti-Semitism = happy unicorn funtime

      Also: “hate crime spiked after the first referendum”

      Citation needed motherfucker.

      1. leon

        Seeing as hate crimes are defined by exercising your free speech while committing a crime, maybe they just assumed it.

        1. Not Adahn

          The crime of course, being speaking.

          1. AlexinCT

            The crime is questioning the stupidity of the new marxist/fascist movement hiding behind the social justice slogan.

      2. Atanarjuat

        That’s the great thing about hate crime stats–they can prove anything. Most of them are fabricated, the definition is fuzzy, and there’s no standard for reporting them.

      3. It’s nice to see that the movement is exactly the same all over the world. If for any reason you are against centralized bureaucratic authority, you are a racist and a bigot. Also, this is exactly how you get people who would have enjoyed a healthy dose of schadenfreude if Trump had gone bankrupt before, say, 2015, voting for him in a presidential election, or people voting for UKIP, apparently.

    2. Tonio

      Kudos to whoever here called it immediately after the referendum – they will just keep on having referenda until they get the results they want.

      1. AlexinCT

        The left has always demanded another vote until they got what they wanted. After that, they made sure nobody could overturn their power grab without the use of force. The 20th century, and now even the 21st one, are replete of examples of this taking place. Brussels exists because they made the Euros vote until they got the EU. After that they have not only fought & undermined any vote against the interests of Brussels, but they actively have tried to punish anyone even pointing out the corruption of the EU system.

        Europeans have traded the illusion of security for their freedoms, and as we are seeing here, they will have neither.

      2. Rhywun

        And gaslight the fuck out of the public to make it happen.

    3. Rebel Scum

      It feeds off victory

      No one likes a loser.

    4. The People’s Vote was held on 23 June 2016.

  23. IMNSHO, there is absolutely NO reason to go to an Ivy or other hoity toity university unless you either plan on becoming a corruptocrat or you’re old money legacy who is already an idler.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/us/college-admissions-rates.html

    I’ve always marveled at the not-so-subtle assumption that biochemistry is somehow different at HAHVAHD than it is at Drunken Sex State U. Do they have special textbooks or something?

    1. Tundra

      The reason used to be the contacts and networking. The shitheads have devalued even that.

      1. AlexinCT

        And I hope their shenanigans help completely destroy that system sooner than later. At least in the past this club created people that knew they had to deliver to keep the power/perks they demanded because of their credentials. The morons we have today are pissed that people expect them to deliver to keep their power/perks/wealth, and want to curb-stomp the movement that has basically started telling them that failure will have consequences.

      2. Networking is still huge in law. I went to SMU, and could probably have 3 competing job offers by this afternoon if we were to move back there. The guy who sits next to me and went to Georgetown would have a hard time getting that many in a month because his network is here in DC.

        In EE it’s completely different. I interviewed for jobs all across the country when I was graduating from Purdue. I could’ve worked in whichever city I wanted.

        1. This afternoon *in Dallas.

    2. hate_speech

      I dunno, I went to a small state school for Electrical Engineering, and the number of kids there that seemed to be outraged by the idea of having to do work, or take tests on content we had *just* covered was a major drag on the classes making progress through the material.

      1. AlexinCT

        I have often wondered if people realized that college was one of the most expensive purchases people made, only to then try to get the least value from that investment, because getting said value meant working hard and giving up on the partying.

        1. hate_speech

          It’s crazy how out of whack the whole thing is. My EE degree was my 2nd degree. I went back to school when I was 28 because (shocker!) my degree in writing wasn’t getting much use and I was sick of bartending. I went in trying to learn a profession, and all the kids that weren’t really serious about their education were a constant drag. If they could be bothered to get off Facebook, and just pay attention, it would have been a totally different story.

        2. Spartacus

          As one wag once said, “College is the only place where consumers demand less for their money.”

        3. robc

          it fits in with Bryan Caplan’s signaling theory.

          The perfect example: Students are happy when a professor cancels a class. Why? They aren’t getting a refund and they aren’t learning the material for that class, so why are they happy?

          In nearly any of part of life, people would be outraged.

          1. Because they’re there for the credential, and the less effort required for that credential, the better.

    3. The Last American Hero

      My understanding was that the classes were filled with high school valedictorians, so there would be no grading on a curve and the pace would be quicker since you were in a room full of sharks. But that may have changed over the last 30 years.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Hell, Hopkins was all valedictorians and there absolutely was a curve. They were notorious for breaking the spirits of students who thought they were academically invincible.

        Of course that was 30 years ago.

    4. Enough About Palin

      My brother is a PhD. Chemist (UCLA and then Columbia post-doc). He was offered a full-ride by Harvard to get his PhD there, but he passed and went to UCLA instead. The work he did with Dr. Cram at UCLA won the Nobel Prize in chemistry in about 1986. He told me that the reason he passed on Harvard was because their program wasn’t all that great unless what you wanted to do was teach.

  24. Rufus the Monocled

    Thanks to these links, I’ve already used up three NYT articles for the month.

    THANKS TRUMP!

    1. My cat threw up a hairball in the middle of the night.

      THANKS TRUMP

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        I’m trying out a new espresso in my machine and it’s a bit fickle.

        THANKS TRUMP.

        1. WTF

          My GSD woke me up at 4:00 AM vomiting.

          THANKS TRUMP!

          1. Slammer

            I now have to turn off my adblocker to use 4chan

            THANKS TRUMP

          2. AlexinCT

            Winston’s mom, something something…

            THANKS TRUMP!

          3. Not Adahn

            Raised her prices?

            No longer accepts food stamps?

            Requires a voter ID card with a registration for the Democrats?

          4. DrOtto

            I’m self employed and no one scheduled with me today.
            THANKS TRUMP!

          5. I’m eating lunch in the break room and the Weather channel is on.

            THANKS TRUMP!

  25. Rebel Scum

    The balls on these people. (except for Brian Stelter)

    “We need to figure out what went wrong with the Mueller report, why — in all fairness to your network, why the media got it so wrong for so long,” Mulvaney said. “How did the media get it so wrong?”

    “But I’m not sure what you’re saying the media got wrong,” Tapper responded. “The media reported what — the investigation was going on. Other than the people in the media on the left, not on this network, I don’t know anybody who got anything wrong.”

    “We didn’t say that there was conspiracy,” Tapper continued. “We said that Mueller was investigating conspiracy.”

    “If that’s your recollection of history, that’s great,” Mulvaney responded. “Face it, come on, the media got this wrong, Jake. It’s Okay. People get stuff wrong all the time, just not at this level. But it’s done now. The report is there. It’s extraordinarily thorough, as you know. I think they talked to 500 people, issued 2,800 subpoenas.”

    “And it completely exonerates the president,” Mulvaney added. “There’s no collusion. There’s no obstruction of justice.”

    1. leon

      “The media reported what — the investigation was going on”

      Nice save, it’s almost like your recollection of what actually happened contradicts your taking point.

    2. ““If that’s your recollection of history, that’s great,” === “I’m sorry if you’re upset because of something I said.”

    3. The Last American Hero

      He should have rolled that 4 minute tape of the compilation of breathless reporting by the various news outlets parroting the same lines over the last 2 years.

    4. Fatty Bolger

      What the fuck happened with Tapper, anyway? I seem to remember him somewhat approximating a traditional journalist. Now he’s just another CNN shill.

  26. Rufus the Monocled

    I had a feeling Lebron with the Lakers would not go so well.

  27. James K. Koehler: A history of socialism

    Editor: A reply to Fred Barber’s rant concerning Socialism (March 27) is certainly in order. I wonder if Fred now sends back all his Social Security checks to help pay for the wall? Maybe he also insists on putting out the fire that might take his house all by himself since the fire department is a manifestation of socialism? How about the public libraries and the school lunch programs?

    Let’s take the books out of our children’s hands and the food out of their mouths because of these evil socialistic programs. The equating of the Nazi Party to a socialist organization is a blatant revision of history.

    Although the term “socialist” is included in the name of the party, the abbreviation NAZI stood for” National Socialist German Workers Party”. It should be clear to anyone having had some high school history that the Nazis were not socialists but a dictatorial, fascist and racist regime that worked hand in hand with Germany’s capitalist industries.

    1. Tonio

      That’s some wonderful bullshit right there.

      1. AlexinCT

        So this cunt is using the same argument the people that were confronted with the evils of marxism, another form of socialism, used: “that was not the real thing!”

        Yeah, sure.

    2. WTF

      Somebody doesn’t know what socialism is.

      1. Rebel Scum

        They literally used marxist language in their platform.

        1. AlexinCT

          It’s the whole “that was not real marxism socialism” trope all over again.

      2. hate_speech

        Not to mention that basically every politician in Germany was a socialist at the time (according to Hayek I think? Maybe Orwell). There were just competing flavors of the same thing.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        What do you know? DID YOU GO TO BOVINE UNIVERSITY?

        1. The Last American Hero

          Those of us that did know a pile of bullshit when we see it.

      2. AlexinCT

        The funny thing I keep pointing out to our new socialism peddling types is that they are historically illiterate douches. Since redeeming marxism has become night impossible – now that we all know this evil belief killed over 120 million people and condemned close to 3 billion to hell on earth in a period less than 100 years long, and the people that used to pretend the problem was that it was not real marxism are no longer even taken seriously – they have decided to switch to peddling socialism other than marxism. See, new socialism will not follow marxism’s lead and have government just take over everything, in the process generating a two class system where the elite have things and the serfs stand in line for basic necessities and get sent to camps for complaining, like marxism did. Instead, new socialism will give government the power to pick the winners so they can achieve some goal.

        Morons that lack actual historical education or assholes with an agenda, will pretend this was/is not what fascism was peddling. Whether it be what was done by Mussolini or Hitler, or what others that followed their ideas until WW2 broke out and then pretended to no longer like that shit did, it is a form of socialism where government colludes with business to pick winners and losers in order to avoid any direct blame when shit goes wrong. Obamacare was a great example of this practice. They rigged it so private insurers would eventually fail, both allowing the assholes in government to blame the private sector for the fail, and then come in with a solution the majority of people would never have accepted otherwise while looking like they are saviors.

        Fascism, as I am sure history will bear out, whether it is the old time version from the 1930s, or the new version peddled by the left now, is evil. That is why it needs to disarm the populous and make them sheep.

    3. leon

      “It should be clear to anyone having had some high school history that the Nazis were not socialists but a dictatorial, fascist and racist regime that worked hand in hand with Germany’s capitalist industries”

      This is an assertion, not an argument. It’s the worst kind to. An appeal to peoples pride. “If you think otherwise your dumber than a highschool student”. Does the guy not know that highschool are notorious for perpetuating falsehoods and half-truths.

      1. robc

        Public/private partnerships are a kind of socialism. Less so than full blown communism, but down the scale from laissez-faire capitalism.

        1. Yeah but these are the same people who will argue with a straight face that the economic system in China is capitalist.

      2. Rebel Scum

        Does the guy not know

        He is counting on it.

      3. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Fascist = Something I don’t like

        I despise the dumbing down of America.

        1. robc

          Orwell in the 1940s said that was the definition of fascism. So it isn’t just America, and also not a recent thing.

      4. Pope Jimbo

        “If you think otherwise your dumber than a highschool student”

        YOUR A MORON!

        *sorry, but I love that grammar violation

    4. Rufus the Monocled

      They REALLY REALLY split hairs.

    5. Wow, that’s got it all: sloppy thinking, logical fallacies, false equivalencies, appeals to the heart-strings, even personal attacks.

    6. Raven Nation

      FWIW: when I get to the 20th century in my World History classes, I tend to lump Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and the USSR into one week on “collectivism” and “statism.” It gets students to see the similarities without leading them into socialism/not socialism debates. It also makes it easier to connect some dots to the collectivist policies in the US & Europe both pre- and post-war.

      1. That strikes me as more useful from a historical perspective.

        1. AlexinCT

          Which is why the left wants none of that….

    7. Pope Jimbo

      This whole debate is stupid. As people have pointed out, trying to fit Nazis and Commies on the same access we use for the GOP and Dems is comparing apples and oranges.

      The root cause is that the proggies try to hang Nazism around the neck of the GOP. The GOP doesn’t like this much so they point out the socialist economic policies in the Nazi platform and try to throw it back onto the Dems.

      I’m just going to come out and say that neither party is Nazi-lite. Trying to make your opponents into the second coming of the Nazis is a shitty thing to do, but I’m not surprised that Team players keep trying to do it.

      1. The Last American Hero

        So when Congress calls a CEO in to testify and basically says accept regulations and do penance or face the full wrath of the IRS, DOJ, FBI, FCC, FTC and SEC investigations, that’s not fascist?

        1. AlexinCT

          That is one of the most important hallmarks of the fascist system: government picks the winners & losers.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          Sure it is fascistic. But I don’t see either party on the verge of running trainfuls of their enemies into camps (yet).

          The problem is that neither Team sees anything wrong with hauling business people in for re-education. When they call each other Nazis it is all about death camps and genocide.

          1. AlexinCT

            Sure it is fascistic. But I don’t see either party on the verge of running trainfuls of their enemies into camps (yet).

            Why would you need to do so when today you can destroy their ability to make a living, even by leveling false charges at them, and destroy them just as effectively and efficiently?

  28. PBRstreetgang

    WAHOOWA. FINAL FOUR.

    Dream realized.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      Uffda. I have to walk on eggshells today because the guy who sits next to me is a huge St. Cloud Huskies bobo (who took time off to watch the tourney in Fargo).

      He is not going to be pleased the Huskies choked to something called American International.

      1. So they choked to Roger Corman?

    2. That was a great game! Too bad we had to be on the losing side of it.

  29. Even if Bigfoot isn’t real, we still need him

    I’m not crazy. And I’m not alone. From the dawn of human history, we’ve shared stories about creatures outside the bounds of civilization, avatars of the wild: Enkidu, Gilgamesh’s wild companion in the Mesopotamian epic; Grendel, that greedy, loping shadow-stalker of the Danish fens; the Australian yowie; the Himalayan yeti. Bigfoot first appeared under its Salish name, Saskehavas, Sasquatch, in modern literature in 1929. Maclean’s, the Canadian news magazine, described the Sasquatch as “strange people, of whom there are but few now — rarely seen and seldom met … ‘the hairy mountain men.’ ” Tribal nations of the Pacific Northwest used stories of Sasquatch to educate their children. How better to personify the unpredictable nature of the wilderness than with a mysterious, unpredictable wild thing? A creature like us — but not us. By the 1950s, (as U.S. tribes were being removed from reservations and relocated into urban areas) Sasquatch was fully appropriated as Bigfoot, becoming an American icon. Hundreds of books, countless TV shows … and my own podcast. Why?

    “I think we need (Bigfoot) in a deep-seated psychological way, because of our evolutionary origins,” Robert Michael Pyle, a lepidopterist, naturalist and poet, told me in an interview late last summer. We were walking through a quiet and heavily forested glade in coastal Washington. “I think it goes all the way back to what we came from.”

    1. WTF

      STEVE SMITH LIKE TO FEEL NEEDED!

    2. leon

      BIGGEST TRICK STEVE SMITH PULL IS CONVINCE DUMB HOOMANS HE NO REAL.

      AND BY TRICK MEAN…

    3. Suthenboy

      The boogieman didn’t get dreamed up out of thin air and there is a reason both human and neandertal’s bones have teeth marks on them.
      Now is the best time to be alive and living in the civilized west. Human history is full of horrors.

      1. AlexinCT

        Just because we don’t have any thing eating humans regularly doesn’t mean the horrors have gone away. These days the perps tent to be other humans that grab power by telling low information people that they can solve all their problems if they let them use the power of government to punish those they don’t like.

    1. WTF

      The story on misappropriation of funds seems to have been disappeared, hasn’t it?

      1. AlexinCT

        Yeah, the media has no interest on reporting on that, and the powers that be no longer feel a need to push it.. I would not be surprised we find out Pelosi was behind the story coming out and that she has also issued cease & desist orders now that it achieved what she needed (to remind Karla Marx that she is owned).

  30. For decades, Garfield telephones kept washing ashore in France. Now the mystery has been solved.

    But when the group entered the cave, ready for the big reveal, they didn’t find what they expected. It was clear the plastic cats had been there, Simonin-Le Meur said, but clearer still that most were already gone.

    “Our preoccupation was to understand why we had so many Garfields everywhere. We thought it would be helpful to find the container so we can stop it. But that was unfortunately not the case,” Simonin-Le Meur said. “What we found was the remainder of the shipping container. And it was empty.”

    It seemed the group had solved the mystery, she said, but not the problem.

    The “Téléphone Garfield,” as it is known in an online catalogue for ubiquitous ocean debris, is just one plastic item among myriad others that litter the ocean and the shore every year. In the region of northwestern France, the Garfield phone has become like an unwitting Smokey Bear, the mascot for the importance of ocean cleanup and the dangers of microplastics polluting the ocean. Lionel Lucas, who developed the online Ocean Plastic Tracker that catalogues discoveries of Garfield, told FranceInfo the Garfield phone was a “symbol” for the movement.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Heathcliff was better.

      1. Tundra

        Bill or GTFO

        1. Sean

          +1 ACK

          1. Not Adahn

            Pbffth!

    2. The Last American Hero

      I’ll take Garfield phones over amnesiac super-spies.

      1. AlexinCT

        Especially when they make a moron like Matt Damon try to pass himself off as one of those…

  31. Cy

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/buttigieg-touts-7-million-campaign-cash-haul

    LOL!

    He doesn’t realize the donations were all from republicans who really wanted to see a bunch of democrats driving around with BUTTGIEG bumper stickers.

    1. LJW

      Imagine how many leftist programs could be funded voluntarily in the free market if they didn’t throw all their money to the politicians.

    2. Pope Jimbo

      “Don’t poke the Buttgieg!”

  32. Tundra

    Thanks for pinch-hitting, Old Man!

    I liked the musical selection a lot. This one is strong, too.

    A lot of sound for one dude.

  33. Shpip

    One for OMWC.

    1. Old Man With Candy

      A proper fish is rubber.

      1. Shpip

        Here lies an ex of Old Man With Candy
        Died at the age of one hundred and three
        For nearly eight years she kept her virginity
        Not a bad record for his vicinity

    2. And…desktop background set.

    1. the administration would stop food stamps after three months for ABAWDs who don’t work, volunteer or get job training for at least 20 hours a week. That’s already the law, but many states waive that requirement in high unemployment areas. The Trump administration would make those waivers much more difficult to come by.

      Oh noes, the Administration is going to… enforce the law.

      I don’t see the problem.

      1. Tundra

        In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
        By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
        But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
        And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

    2. leon

      Don’t worry, I’m sure a judge will allow Obama to come out of retirement to make an EO taking away power from the president.

    3. Ayn Random Variation

      Oh SNAP!

  34. Trigger Hippie

    “Not only has he defined himself. He has shown us in so many ways, including his choosing of (Paul) Manafort to come and run his campaign. Manafort, who had been working with Putin and the Kremlin as they tried to exercise more power in the Ukraine,” she said.

    Waters said “they” did that so Putin could have sanctions lifted so Russia could drill for oil in the Arctic.’

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/paul-manafort-worked-for-ukraine-not-russia/amp/

    Maxine, you ignorant slut.

  35. Ayn Random Variation

    Fake or true re: the allegation that 14 months ago, on the night he tore his ACL, ex Knick KP went home, raped a fellow tenant in his building, beat her and called her slave, andohbythewayredusedtopayher68ktokeepherquiet..

    https://nypost.com/2019/03/31/kristaps-porzingis-reportedly-called-black-woman-my-slave-as-he-beat-raped-her/amp/

    1. Drake

      Man, that just wasn’t his day.

    2. I’ve torn an ACL. That sounds like way, way, way more physical activity than I’d have been capable of performing hours after seeing my knee bend sideways and fighting off shock, but then again I’m not a professional athlete.

      1. Drake

        Sounds like way too much effort to get off even with 2 good knees. Particularly by a pro-athlete who probably has no problem meeting willing ladies.

        1. Right? That’s another angle: dude could probably pay any number of women specifically to call them names while he bangs them. There’s probably some pretty, dark-skinned submissive ladies who would be thrilled to make a couple thousand bucks for an evening with a giant Latvian athlete with more money than he can count.

    3. Cy

      “The 7-foot-3 athlete, who is white,”

      Someone get me a rope!

    4. Heroic Mulatto

      Law enforcement sources told The Post — which broke the story Saturday that the NYPD is investigating the rape allegation against the hoops star — that they could not immediately confirm that he used the vile language.

      The fuck? We deserve to know the exact words he used while conducting the assault. Everyone knows hate speech makes rape more rapey.

      1. Jarflax

        Always tell the women you rape how much you respect their courage and strength. It’s only right.

        1. Not Adahn

          Stunning and Brave

  36. Rebel Scum

    The Latest Scheme to Turn Gun Owners into Criminals

    The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. However, gun control activists are trying to criminalize gun ownership. Their next step is that you are a criminal if you take a gun out in public. If they have to let you own a gun, you can’t ever take it out of its case.

    Liberals continue to try to criminalize private ownership of guns, despite losing a key battle in District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 2820–2821, 171 L.Ed.2d 637, (2008). Unlike conservatives, left-wingers never quit. They intend to win the war eventually and disarm the American people.

    Now they claim that it is illegal to “open carry” a firearm. The mere existence of a gun if anyone else is around now has become the crime of “brandishing” and/or “assault” (which means frightening people, contrary to popular misunderstanding) or both.

    In Virginia, in the Fredericksburg General District Court, my client was charged with two counts of “brandishing” a firearm under Va. Code § 18.2-282 and two counts of assault under the all-purpose (vague) Va. Code §18.2-57, for a single incident that took no more than 30 seconds. (In my own defense, I took the case knowing that Virginia statutes are bad and need to be challenged by a campaign of appeals.)

    1. leon

      IIRC the SCOTUS had hinted ( or even ruled?) that Open Cary is a well defined ancient right.

    2. “Brandishing” is equivalent to the various local laws that amount to “acting suspicious”. There seems to be an awful lot of leeway in terms of what exactly constitutes brandishing versus carrying, and if there’s anything a police state loves, it’s poorly-worded law.

    3. Raven Nation

      One Kiwi stands up to the mob: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12218204

      “Fishing and Outdoors editor Graham Carter stood by an article in his paper today which called out Ardern and Police Minister Stuart Nash.

      “Our Dumb-as-a-Plank New Zealand Prime Minister and lapdog New Zealand Police Minister have announced a ban on assault rifles that are and have been banned for the last ‘thirty-five years’.

      “Comments made by our PM are disingenuous and misleading the general public.”

      The article, written by John McNab, goes on to say that it was already illegal to fire any rifle which was “full-auto” even if it was a defence force firearm.

      “This is what happens when dumb people are put in charge of stuff they don’t understand, and who are too dumb to either admit it, or to listen to facts from people who do understand the stuff in question.

      “Then we have all the flower powder puffs coming out of the woodwork who know little if anything about the issues here.”

      1. Tundra

        He’s fucked.

        But good on him for pushing back.

      2. Good for him. Little late in the day, though. I won’t be at all surprised if he gets picked up for hate speech or something.

    4. l0b0t

      I seem to recall Colorado being open-carry except for Co. Springs, Denver, Boulder, and Pueblo where one was likely to be charged with Flagrant Display.

      1. “Flagrant Display”

        That’s what happens when a dood wears spandex at the gym.

        1. Cy

          Bowie still did it best.

          1. Not Adahn

            Dance belts are a thing.

    5. Scruffy Nerfherder

      He doesn’t mention the name of the Commonwealth’s Attorney. It was purely their decision to prosecute this case.

  37. The Late P Brooks

    “They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get reelected,” Ocasio-Cortez said Friday during a night hall event with MSNBC with Chris Hayes.

    If that were true, woulodn’t it say, “No dead people”?

    1. Count Potato

      Miss me with that gay shit.

      Reagan/Coolidge 2024

    1. AlexinCT

      It has to be climate change, cause otherwise someone might point out it is the corruption that plagues most of these African nations. Especially the ones that flirted with marxism….

      1. Not Adahn

        Remember when Reagan had the CIA infect Ethiopian crops with AIDS?

        1. AlexinCT

          Or had the Nicaraguan Contras sell their cocaine as crack to the people in the hood to finance the evil revolution to fight the lawfully elected Nicaraguan marxist government?

          1. Not Adahn

            True story — when I was in college, there were professors who had sign-up sheets on their doors recruiting students to go and fight the Contras. This was in Reagan-bush era Oklahoma. It blows my mind when people think that Marxists on academia is a new or isolated thing.

  38. Pope Jimbo

    The Noor trial is starting and MPR did some fine reporting

    Actually most of it is pretty good, but there is a section in there about the racial aspects of the trial and that makes the article worth reading.

    Minneapolis City Council member Abdi Warsame said some right-wing media falsely implied Noor shot Ruszczyk for religious or cultural reasons.

    “Him being Somali, I could understand the impact it would have on the community,” Warsame said, “but he was a police officer first and foremost, and he should have been treated like any other police officer.”

    If Noor is convicted, Harris said it could actually undermine some efforts at increasing police accountability.

    “For many in communities of color, they’re so used to seeing the racial patterns of criminal enforcement by police or sentencing by courts,” Harris said. “This will seem like not just a singular example of something happening, but another in a long train of examples where a person gets a different kind of justice because of what they look like.”

    So I guess we have to let him off the hook because we let all the white cops off?

    1. Noted supporter of police shootings David Harris, of Pittsburgh, PA…

    2. leon

      And this is why BLM didn’t get any measurable change. They focused on race and so only misconduct by white cops can be used to hold police accountable.

      1. Tundra

        This is a weird one, because the Somali community and the AA community aren’t exactly simpatico.

        I think he needs to go down for this one. Bad shoot.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Sadly, the one reason I have some hope that he will go down is that the cops in Minneapolis don’t want to work with a knucklehead who is willing to shoot across his partner in a car to kill someone. So they will allow the system to convict him of something.

          I’m amazed his partner didn’t club him into unconsciousness at the scene. If I was driving a car and the passenger shot across my face (for any reason) I would not be happy.

        2. A Leap at the Wheel

          Meanwhile, most of the white urban community would prefer to stick their fingers in their ears and yell “Minnesota Miracle” as they autobrainwash themselves into believing there’s nothing wrong with this city.

          1. Tundra

            Things are getting weird again. Should be an interesting summer.

  39. The Late P Brooks

    This is what happens when dumb people are put in charge of stuff they don’t understand, and who are too dumb to either admit it, or to listen to facts from people who do understand the stuff in question.

    The epitaph of western civilization.

  40. The Late P Brooks

    Fishing and Outdoors editor Graham Carter stood by an article in his paper today which called out Ardern and Police Minister Stuart Nash.

    He’ll be getting a visit from the Chief Censor in the very near future.

    “This publication will cease operation, effective immediately, by order of”

  41. The Heath Ledger is back and faker than ever.

  42. Pope Jimbo

    I am not happy to have Biden compared to St. Francis.

    Why didn’t you compare him to Favre? Brett and his dick pics seems far closer to Uncle Joe than Fran.

  43. Pope Jimbo

    I can’t believe you guys are making fun of AOC. She’s totes right about FDR. If it wasn’t for that amendment to our constitution, zombie FDR would be running a campaign of terror using the CCC as his storm troopers today.

    1. LJW

      I thought AOC said FDR was a racist? If so keeping zombie FDR from re-election was a good thing.

      1. SugarFree

        FDR was a racist

        Just against the Japanese, and they are the white people of Asia.

  44. The Late P Brooks

    RESISTORS!

    In recent months the science fiction world has grown increasingly political, with dozens of writers contributing stories to anthologies such as Resist: Tales from a Future Worth Fighting Against and If This Goes On. Another prominent example is A People’s Future of the United States, edited by Victor LaValle and John Joseph Adams.

    “I wanted to use my position as an editor to try to help magnify the voices of the people that we invited to participate in this anthology,” Adams says in Episode 354 of the Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast. “To sort of shout back at the Trump administration, and also to try to imagine some new futures that might help us figure out how to get back to normal from here.”

    The book draws inspiration (and its title) from Howard Zinn‘s counterculture classic A People’s History of the United States, and like that earlier work, A People’s Future of the United States tries to present a wide variety of marginalized perspectives. Science fiction author Sam J. Miller, who contributed a story to the anthology, was strongly influenced by Zinn.

    ———-

    Another contributor to the anthology, Caribbean-born science fiction author Tobias S. Buckell, feels that many people grew complacent during the Obama years, which allowed ugly rhetoric to proliferate. “As someone who puts diverse characters in my books—and is diverse himself—that background noise has always been a part of my career that I’ve had to deal with,” he says. “In 2013 everyone felt that I was being a little bit worked up, and now it seems like a great deal of the rest of the world has kind of caught up.

    Let’s all try to imagine our way to a better world. One in which a selfless heroine with a lifelong devotion to public service won the Presidency and crushed the patriarchy, banished white nationalism, and and made all the scary gunz into sculptures of pretty flowers.

    1. wdalasio

      And they keep complaining that the industry isn’t making money. Go figure.

    2. Rebel Scum

      A People’s Future of the United States

      Pass. Sounds like misery and death caused by socialism.

    3. We need to RESIST so we can give more power to the State, so people can have less rights, less freedom, and more tyranny.

      We truly live in the most fucked up timeline.

    4. Drake

      I still have this in my range bag. Used to read it when the son was doing the youth classes at the gun club.

    5. Rhywun

      is diverse himself

      WTF does that even mean?

      1. AlexinCT

        It means it is a lunatic proggie douche.

    6. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That was on my news feed. I had blocked it from memory.

      feels that many people grew complacent during the Obama years, which allowed ugly rhetoric to proliferate

      Yeah he’s totally right, nobody ever proclaimed their political opposition was racist and that the only reason someone would oppose Obama’s policies was racism. Nobody.

      and is diverse himself

      What an asshole.

  45. Rebel Scum

    Someone still has “fuck you” money.

    “They said ‘No Jussie Smollett jokes,’” said Rock, presenting one of the awards.

    “What a waste of light skin,” the famed comedian mocked. “Do you know what I could do with that light skin? That curly hair? My career would be out of here! I’d be running Hollywood.”

    “What the hell was he thinking?” he asked.

    “You’re ‘Jessie’ from now on,” Rock joked. “You don’t get the ‘u’ no more. That ‘u’ was respect. You ain’t getting no respect from me!”

    The camera panned to the amused audience, notably including “The Daily Show” host Trevor Noah, who was completely unable to contain his laughter. Noah and the crew at “The Daily Show” also ripped Smollett, putting out a viral mock sketch of the alleged hate crime hoax soon after the “Empire” star was charged.

    It’s pretty tame. But I am glad he did it.

  46. The Late P Brooks

    I’m amazed his partner didn’t club him into unconsciousness at the scene. If I was driving a car and the passenger shot across my face (for any reason) I would not be happy.

    No kidding. I assume the partner is retired on full disability after that.

  47. wdalasio

    I’m not sure the Dems have thought things through sufficiently. Yes, trying to go after Donald Trump as a criminal plays well with their base. I geet that. But, the entire country is not their base. Mueller has investigated Trump. He came up empty. Now, there’s an established study, a study the Democrats themselves endorsed, that says the criminal angle just doesn’t hunt. How do they think continuing the discredited narrative plays with the rest of the country? Do they think it makes them look sane, sober, and credible?

    1. I think it’s one of those things where, initially, it could read as responsible governance. Like, here’s this smoke, here’s all this suspicious stuff around the election, and as servants of the people we’re going to investigate. But the expiration date on that is well past, and they’re obviously losing the support of people who aren’t currently suffering deeply from TDS. I still firmly believe that the 2020 is Trump’s to lose. Which he certainly could, of course, but I think he’s done a workmanlike job of doing a controlled burn of his public image. What are you gonna do, accuse him of saying something offensive on Twitter? The man can’t be shamed because he has embraced not giving a single fuck as a public way of life.

      1. Heroic Mulatto

        I still firmly believe that the 2020 is Trump’s to lose.

        Short of Epstein releasing photos of Trump cornholeing some 12 year old Cuban girl, I can’t see how. And even then, the majority of Trump fans would take that ball and run with it as evidence of how “alpha” he is.

        Both parties can play exclusively to their increasingly radicalized base because they know the demographic of centrists has shrunk considerably. And what are undecided centrists, etc. going to do, vote 3rd party? ROFL HA HA HA!

        1. Democratic Hitler

          Kind of where I am as well. The swing votes that actually have any play are down to a handful of counties in Florida and Ohio, right? Everyone else has either picked a team or their vote doesn’t matter because the state they live in has collectively picked a team.

        2. Not Adahn

          Is the Cuban girl thicc?

          1. Heroic Mulatto

            Of course!

    2. Suthenboy

      They are not sane, sober or credible. The whole Russia angle was a bald faced lie and they knew it because they are the ones who invented it out of thin air. Surely they knew it would be discovered sooner or later. The problem of course is that they lied to themselves so much for so long that I think a good many of them actually believed it. That isnt the behavior of sane people.

      1. AlexinCT

        The reason they went with the lie and can’t stop is simple: after Trump won the election they had rigged for Hilary, the ability to hide the criminal activity of the Obama administration was seriously compromised. Especially with a loose canon like Trump. They hoped that their hoax would allow them to torpedo the Trump presidency, and then allow them to hold that axe over whomever followed’s head to keep the corruption and criminal activity under Obama secret. Their attempted coup failed, and their whole campaign got derailed. Now they are even more desperate to find a way to stop him, because not only have they failed, but they now have a pissed off Trump whom is out for blood.

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          I wouldn’t mind seeing Trump seriously cleaning house but I’m not sure even he has the stones for trying that. There’d be political pushback like you’ve never seen if he actually does go on the warpath.

          1. AlexinCT

            The fact that quite a few team red asshats are realizing that Trumps refusal to back down is why he is winning, is IMO why this will play out bad for team blue. It’s payback time, and team red is starting to realize that allowing what was done to stand unchallenged means that they are going to have to accept team blue will never again allow them to hold power. That is why I suspect there will be some consequences.

            Will we see Obama and Clinton wearing orange suits and making license plates? Likely not, but a lot of Obama admin people I suspect are not going to get away with the shit they did.

          2. Suthenboy

            If you think Trump is a blowhard now wait until 2021. He is just sharpening his knives now.

          3. hate_speech

            +1 ‘The Night of the Long Tweets’

          4. Not Adahn

            *opera applause*

          5. hate_speech

            *Takes Bow*

            *Trump mask and smartphone fall out of jacket*

    3. Rebel Scum

      Do they think it makes them look sane, sober, and credible?

      Does it matter?

      1. wdalasio

        I’d think, if you’re a political creature, yes, it would.

        1. Rebel Scum

          It would if we had honest news media. When 90% of it is running propaganda for your side I think appearing sane and sober matters less.

          1. Exhibit A: Cory Booker.

    4. Rhywun

      The Russia angle is yesterday’s news. They’re going with business shakedown now.

  48. Pope Jimbo

    Anyone else sort of upset that Mueller is getting a tongue bath from the GOP now that he returned no indictments?

    I keep reading about how this proves how much integrity that he has. No one seems to be worried that he absolutely fucked over several people’s lives in order to try to get someone to flip on Trump. Sure most of them are swamp creatures that it is hard to feel sorry for. But if we are sticking to principles, shouldn’t someone be sticking up for their rights too?

    1. bacon-magic

      Wait until the pardons get handed out.

    2. R C Dean

      I keep reading about how this proves how much integrity that he has.

      Leaving aside whether someone with integrity would have taken the appointment at all, he knew within a few months that the Russia angle was bullshit, but kept the investigation going as a perjury obstruction trap for Trump.

      The man has no integrity.

  49. Judge to consider banning man from having sex with his wife of 20 years

    The woman has learning difficulties, and social services bosses with responsibility for her care say there is evidence that her mental health has deteriorated to the point that she no longer has the ability to make decisions about whether she wants to have sex.

    A judge in the Court of Protection in London – a specialist court which looks at issues involving people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions – has been asked to consider the case.

    Lawyers representing social services bosses have suggested the judge might consider making an order barring the man from continuing to have sex with his wife to ensure she is not raped.

    At a preliminary hearing, Mr Justice Hayden was told that the man had offered to give an undertaking not to have sex with his wife.

    1. How is this different from marriage in general?

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        Only lasts 20 years

  50. The Late P Brooks

    During my 4 AM sleep mode malfunction, I watched a pair of Bloomberg idiots interviewing some British Labour politician. It was very enlightening. He explained that the Brexit vote did not actually have anything to do with the EU, and the people who voted “leave” didn’t even know what they were voting for (or against). The whole thing should be chucked, because that is what any mature, sensible person would want. Also, England has been destroyed by Thatcherite austerity, and Labour will right every wrong.

    The Bloomberg idiot tossed in his two pence, and said in America, the Republicans represent the few, and the Democrats represent the many, and only a fool would believe otherwise. Why do the hicks vote against their own best interests, and turn away from those who merely want to make their lives better?

    1. Count Potato

      Japan is weird?

  51. Dear Abby: Couple’s sex life fizzles when husband obsesses over wife’s weight

    DEAR ABBY: I have been with my husband for 20 years. I’m 43, and he’s 63. Our sex life has died. He is no longer attracted to me, and he has let me know it.

    His love is physical, not emotional. I am not the size 4 I was when he met me. As long as my body looks like he wants it to look, he’s into me. If I’m a size 8 or more, he is not at all into me. I have a hard time understanding how he can love me for how I look.

    Long story short, my first love has popped back into my life. I have tested the waters with him, and I’m in over my head with the way he makes me feel. I haven’t slept with him yet, but I have done everything but. The chemistry between us is undeniable.

    I know I’m betraying my husband, and I don’t want to hurt him. He is aware of this, and I don’t know what to do. Help! — MORE THAN LOOKS IN THE SOUTH

    1. Cy

      DEAR ABBY: I’m almost sure my wife is cheating on me. On her ladies’ night out she has been getting home later and later. Someone drops her off at the corner and she walks to the house. The last time, I hid behind my Harley in the driveway to see if I could determine who is dropping her off. While crouching behind the bike, I noticed a puddle of oil on the driveway. Should I try to fix it myself or should I take it to the dealer? — JIM IN IOWA FALLS

      DEAR JIM: Jeez, that one’s older than the hills! As intelligent as you are, I’m sure you’ll make the right decision. Be careful not to slip on the oil while you’re deciding.

    2. Heroic Mulatto

      I have a hard time understanding how he can love me for how I look

      Because at your age, he decided to shack up with a 23 year old?

    1. ChipsnSalsa

      Don’t tease me Trump…

  52. The Late P Brooks

    Anyone else sort of upset that Mueller is getting a tongue bath from the GOP now that he returned no indictments?

    It just falls under the heading of, “Don’t bother to act surprised if….”

  53. Count Potato

    “Rapper Nipsey Hussle seen the day before he was murdered outside his clothing store as it’s revealed he was due to sit down with LAPD to discuss gang violence”

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6873101/Rapper-Nipsey-Hussle-seen-day-murdered.html

  54. LJW

    Great news! As of today, the great state of Kansas now it’s peasantry to purchase “full strength” beer at gas stations and grocery stores. Liquor and wine still not allowed. Praise to our Lord and savior the state for allowing me this privilege!

    1. What was sold before? N/A beer? 1/2 strength?

      1. LJW

        3.2%

        1. Who makes 3.2% beer? That’s low enough that there is no point drinking it.

          1. AlexinCT

            I bet that beer had corn syrup in it too…

          2. kinnath

            That’s 3.2 by weight or 4% ABV. There are a lot of fine beer styles that come in a 4% ABV. Not that I drink anything under about 7%.

          3. Subwoofer

            All the major ‘economy’ brewers make a 3.2% version. Every Utah-based brewery makes it. Sam Adams makes them.

            There’s a lot of 3.2 beer out there.

          4. Hyperion

            Basically, any light beer is about 3% alcohol. So in effect, light beer replaced 3.2.

        2. Stinky Wizzleteats

          So full strength Coors Light and Bud Light then?

    2. LJW

      Oh and liquor stores can now sell food and cocktail mixers! Praise!

    3. Colorado beat you by about 3 months. We just started allowing more than 3.2 at the first of the year.

      Far cry from the Southwest where they have drive-thru heroin stores at 7-11.

    4. Pope Jimbo

      You know one of the best things about 3.2 beer joints? Cops usually don’t care too much about kids buying underage from them.

      At least when I was a kid that was the case. If you couldn’t find a way to get real beer, there were a couple small roadhouses out in the country that had 3.2 beer licenses and were pretty lax about carding.

      1. LJW

        Kansas is hardcore they send people into gas stations, restaurants and bars and if they’re not carded, the business gets fined and all employees are forced to take an alcohol serving class.

        1. A “friend” lived in OP in the early 80’s; her parents had to drive to Missouri to get the good stuff.

          1. LJW

            Occasionally on Sundays if the stock ran dry my dad would make a Missouri liquor store run before the Chiefs game. Now they allow Sunday sales.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          To be fair, the time period I was talking about was early ’80s when you only had to be 19 to drink legally in Minnesoda and MADD hadn’t turned underage drinking into a moral crusade yet.

        3. Gustave Lytton

          I think that’s more of the norm these days.

          Fuck Reagan’s corpse.

    5. Drake

      Count your many blessings that you happen to live in Kansas and not a place like NJ.

      1. LJW

        Agree 100%. Kansas isn’t that bad at all just making fun of our old fashioned liquor law’s.

        1. I love Kansas. I’d live there.

          1. Drake

            #metoo

          2. Jarflax

            I wouldn’t have pegged you as a fan of flat.

  55. Rasilio

    So Friday while driving home I was listening to a Tim Pool video on the Jussie scandal and found myself wondering, why exactly is it that so many political heavy hitters tried to interfere in the investigation either directly or indirectly? It is not like Jussie is someone important, it is at best a C list celebrity on a TV show which is designed to be enjoyed pretty much solely by a demographic that makes up less than 20% of the country It also isn’t like he was in any real danger of serious jail time, at worst he would have gotten something like 6 months with a couple years probation and a fine and within a month of his being arrested everyone would have gone back to not remembering who Jussie Smolett is

    Then it hit me, What if Jussie was Barry’s Monica and was threatening to spill the beans if they didn’t make the investigation go away? Alternatively what if he was banging Michelle in the side

    Obviously idle speculation with nothing to back it up, but it really does fit. Barry and Michelle would have been aware of who Jussie was and he lived in their hometown

    1. Tactical error borne of overconfidence. They’re so used to operating in an echo chamber that they can’t imagine how this fiasco looks to the Deplorables.

      1. AlexinCT

        And they are used to getting away with things like this. None of them has stopped to think that this might actually backfire on them.

      2. kinnath

        As I recall, the Dems stated that they didn’t need the deplorables to win in 2020. And they continue to blame the deplorables for jumping ship, because their deplorable not because the Dems made any mistakes or anything.

      3. Rasilio

        It isn’t whether it is an error so much as why would they care? Jussie Smolette is not someone who political operatives should care about one way or the other. It would have made more sense for politicans to come to R Kelly’s defense than Smolette’s. He shouldn’t have been high profile enough to be moving in the same social circles as the Obamas and their aides so their just being friends doesn’t make sense

        1. AlexinCT

          It’s not about Jussie per se: it is about the narrative about hate crimes the left needs and providing cover to those that believe the narrative. Letting Jussie go is a way to tell people that the law will be made to turn a blind eye to false accusations that help the preferred narrative…

    2. Gustave Lytton

      he lived in their former hometown

    3. wdalasio

      The story I’d heard is that Smollett’s scam was co-ordinated with Harris and, to a lesser extent Booker. They were pushing an anti-lynching/ hate crimes law in Congress. In favor of that particular conspiracy theory is the fact that Harris & Booker both released statements about the incident that echoed each other almost word for word. Smollett would have threatened to go public with the whole scheme if he wasn’t let off the hook.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        I also heard this.

      2. robc

        That got explain Emmanuel being upset about the outcome too. If Harris/Booker our outside the Clinton group choice for Prez, then Rahm could be trying to pressure to expose their involvement.

        But this is just crazy conspiracy theory talk until something comes out.

        1. robc

          Pretend I can write coherently. That was awful.

          1. Democratic Hitler

            Well, you were going for crazy conspiracy talk.

          2. robc

            MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

          3. INFOWARS just called with a job offer for robc.

        2. Jarflax

          Pretty sure Jussie already came out

  56. RE: Biden.

    Why is he bothering with harassing political allies on camera? A guy with his cash and name recognition would have his pick of pussy among the Young Socialists crowd and they’d keep quiet about it. That poor judgement alone is worth disqualifying him.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      He’s used to being the Big Dick On Campus. I believe that he truly doesn’t understand his behavior.

  57. It’s consultant interviewing time again.

    The whole system is set up to create an incentive that favors over-detailed 12+ page resumes to get past the non-technical HR folks slathered in between the technical people and the candidate. So I’m going a bit cross-eyed as the buzzphrases scroll past like magical mantras to placate the guardian spirits and see the Oracle (administrators).

    1. AlexinCT

      It has been over 18 months that I told the powers that be here where I work I will not interview anyone anymore, because the company’s screening process sucks, and the candidates they bring in are morons with credentials and nothing of value to add.

      1. We get some worth hiring. But the process is, well, arcane even by state standards.

    2. Do you have your interview gloves cleaned, waxed, and ready to go?

    3. LJW

      HR should recuse themselves from all IT hiring. My previous job was in cyber fraud investigations. Can’t count how many times I was contacted by HR reps wanting to interview me for IT security jobs.

    4. I’ve only been involved in a few hiring decisions and yes, I also hate the super long resumes filled with buzzphrases. And rather outlandish claims, as if the company they previously worked for would have perished within days if it wasn’t for the job-seekers god-like powers. Example of someone who recently got hired: “I saved the company over $200k in consulting fees with this one simple trick.”

      1. Jarflax

        Was the simple trick orphans? should we recruit this person?

      2. I am doubting this candidate who lists a one-month tenure (still employed at the position when the resume was filed) actually Designed their database backup schema, given how long the organization in question has existed. I’d have accepted “maintained” or “made recommendations for improvement”

      3. LJW

        That wasn’t a resume, that was one of bottom of the page ads you see on TOS.

        1. It’s so confusing!!

    5. Drake

      This is my first post-lay-off weekday. I am rewriting my resume with the guidance of the outplacement consultants. I’ll try to keep it under a dozen pages.

      1. Jarflax

        You should include a sampling of your Glibs comments under “Outside Publications”

        1. Drake

          Heh.

      2. You should avoid taking our advice. We’re well-known trolls.

    6. It’s strange, when I’m reviewing resumes, it feels like I’m shirking work – despite the fact that it is 100% within my job duties to be handling this.

      1. 🙁 I just love when someone thinks half a page of italic text is just A-Okay to send in. Large blocks of Italics are hard to read.

        1. The format that the process incentivizes causes me to be very cynical about the candidates before I’ve even met them. It makes them sound unduly proud of the simplest things because the HR gatekeeping process is rock stupid.

    7. Subwoofer

      How does one actually get hired as a consultant without having friends in high places?

      I’ve done a fair amount of consulting and referred several consultants to orgs over the past several years, but it was always because of personal connections. They knew I’d get their job done (or I knew my referral would do a good job) and sent the work my way. Who actually applies to be a consultant somewhere?

      1. Well, these are IT consultants, which are basically staff that should be in-house but the powers that be don’t want on the headcount. (Consultants are non-personnel expenses) so we send out requests to body shops and get people bid, rate them, interview them, rerate them and recomment to hire X. The contract rate gets paid to the body shop, who pays a lower rate to the consultant. Since we hire a lot of them (upto half the people in a given unit will be staff augmentation consultants) we can’t fill the drudge spots with politically connected people who don’t want the drudge spots anyway. Most of them are H1-Bs, but some are citizens or permanant residents.

        I guess the body shops get called because of connections between the owners and people in-house at the state, but it doesn’t trickle down to the people doing the work.

        1. Subwoofer

          Ah, so its like the ‘government consulting’ industry. Gotcha

  58. Rebel Scum

    Something I am sure many of us suspect.

    As he was deliberating last year over replacing Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, President Trump told confidants he had big plans for Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

    “I’m saving her for Ginsburg,” Trump said of Barrett, according to three sources familiar with the president’s private comments. Trump used that exact line with a number of people, including in a private conversation with an adviser two days before announcing Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination.

    Barrett is a favorite among conservative activists, many of whom wanted her to take Kennedy’s spot.

    She’s young and proudly embraces her Catholic faith.
    Her past academic writings suggest an openness to overturning Roe v. Wade.
    Her nomination would throw gas on the culture-war fires, which Trump relishes.
    But Trump chose to wait.

    Some Trump advisers worried Barrett’s staunch opposition to abortion rights would lose the votes of Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). But there wasn’t consensus; some advisers argued they would ultimately “do the right thing” and vote for Barrett.
    Trump came to doubt that “the women” (his shorthand for Collins and Murkowski) would support Barrett, according to sources who discussed the situation with Trump at the time.
    Some of Trump’s aides also felt confident about picking up more Senate seats in the 2018 midterms (which they did), meaning a more conservative pick might stand a better chance later.

    Clandestine “sources” abound, of course. But this seems believable.

    1. LJW

      Democrats are now accepting applications for Barrett accusers. Let the show trials begin!

    2. R C Dean

      three sources familiar with the president’s private comments

      “The barista at my Starbuck’s told me that one of his other regulars knows somebody in the White House . . . ”

      This would qualify as a “source”.

      Although I wouldn’t be surprised if its true, this story doesn’t give us any real reason to think its true.

  59. People Kill People. But the Bullets Seem to Matter.

    In Boston from 2010 to 2015, there were 221 gun homicides.

    Research suggests that one change could have lowered that number by 40 percent: smaller bullets.

    A study last year, published in JAMA Network Open, examined the type of weapon used in every fatal and nonfatal shooting in the city. It found that — regardless of the time of day, the number of wounds or the circumstances of the crime — the size of the bullet affected which gunshot victims lived and which ones died.

    At the center of the debate about gun control lies the question of whether the availability of deadly weapons increases the seriousness of crime. Critics of gun control contend it doesn’t. As the popular bumper sticker argues: “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people.” The study set out to test that slogan — and found it wanting.

    “The type of weapon matters,” said Philip Cook, an emeritus professor of public policy at Duke University, and one of the study’s co-authors.

    something something stopping power

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      It’s simple, all ammo must have Nerf™ bullets.

    2. Stinky Wizzleteats

      More kinetic energy generally means more damage and a higher probability of a fatality when shot? Well I’ll be damned.

      1. Jarflax

        I recommend a Carl Gustaf

        1. Gustave Lytton

          Let me know when you can get that in a pocket snubbie.

    3. Drake

      When you start restricting magazine capacity, people go for larger caliber handguns.

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Nobody needs more than a .380. In other words, they’ll try to restrict caliber next and they can still claim to be allowing people the exercise of their 2nd Amendment rights. Just think of it all as one big slippery slope that ends with England style restrictions.

        1. Jarflax

          It ends with Gulags, England is not at the end yet.

          1. Drake

            I think England and Sweden end as Islamic Republics in a couple of decades. It’s inevitable without ethnic / religious cleansing on a massive scale.

          2. R C Dean

            I don’t think its inevitable, and it would take more than a couple decades, but it certainly can’t be ruled out.

          3. Drake

            White people aren’t breeding. Christianity is dying – some are converting to Islam. Muslim immigrants breed in large numbers and the waves of Muslim immigrants continue unabated. It’s math.

            When they hit 1/3 Muslim the real excitement begins. Much over that and it’s over.

          4. Gustave Lytton

            Does the British Monarch convert to Islam (along with the CofE)? Or do they just kneel before the Grand Mufti of Canterbury under that scenario?

          5. Rebel Scum

            Islamic Republics

            Is that even a thing?

          6. It’s like a Democratic People’s Republic, only with 100.2% of the electorate voting for the candidate picked by the Mullahs.

          7. Warty

            It’s inevitable without ethnic / religious cleansing on a massive scale.

            Yeah, some cleansing would be nice, wouldn’t it? Get rid of all of the pieces of shit that ruin the place.

          8. Old Man With Candy

            I thought you were a Browns fan?

          9. Drake

            Just stating the facts. Whitey can flee, fight, convert, or accept dhimmitude. The North African and Iberian Goths had the same choices.

          10. Not as long as there’s the Lion of Millwall.

          11. Suthenboy

            Are you sure? They are tossing people in the clink for telling jokes. Cops are out searching for people who were heard muttering to themselves on buses. I would say they are pretty close.

        2. Gustave Lytton

          Make .32 great again?

        3. Rebel Scum

          They usually say “but muskets”. Muskets were often rather large calibers. A Brown Bess, for instance, is a .75 cal.

          1. AlmightyJB

            That’s sharp

          2. Gustave Lytton

            What a beauty.

          3. Suthenboy

            A musket is specifically a weapon of war. Long barrel , bayonet and heavy, full length stock. It was contrived in the days of single shot rifles to be a deadly weapon after that single shot was expended.
            There is no reason we cant build an M-14 in musket configuration.

          4. Rebel Scum

            A musket is specifically a weapon of war

            Likewise for any other arm used to fight, which I like to point out to the “weapons of war off our streets” imbeciles.

    4. AlmightyJB

      This is BS. Once you get into standard sd calibers, shot placement is much more important. Given how the 9mm is the caliber du jour and therefore most chosen by novices, gang bangers, and cops with no gun skills, not surprised average shot place placement would be inferior to more experienced shooters with larger calibers. I prefer a .40 and .45 to a 9mm but no there is no doubt about the 9s lethality. Not to mention the .357 magnum.

      1. Suthenboy

        I remember back in the ’70s a pharmacist in SoCal was being robbed. He pulled out his .25 auto and shot both robbers. One shot each. It was a couple of tough-ass bikers over 250lbs each. They were both dead before they hit the floor.
        Shot placement, indeed.

    5. R C Dean

      The study set out to test that slogan — and found it wanting.

      Because they willfully refuse to comprehend that it is about responsibility and agency.

    6. R C Dean

      A few thoughts:

      The article refers to small, medium, and large caliber bullets without telling us what they actually are. Presumably .22, 9mm, and .45, but that begs the question of where all the other calibers fall.

      They say that .45 are more lethal than 9mm, but I seem to recall hearing that lots of studies on terminal ballistics basically said the two calibers are essentially tied, due to the higher velocity of 9mm v the heavier/wider .45.

      1. Pine_Tree

        I think the 9mm success rate is probably depressed by its popularity. They’re just so common that you get plenty of users who do the spray and pray thing. I’d suspect .45 carriers are probably a little more likely to be practiced shooters, and that probably helps its number.

  60. commodious spittoon

    Tried out a Keurig for the first time this morning. What a silly device.

    1. Tundra

      But it’s a convenient and quick way to make lousy coffee!

      1. R C Dean

        The only time I have gotten decent coffee from a Keurig is when I get one of those reusable Keurig pods that you put your own coffee in.

        1. Must be so people can avoid sweeteners in their brew…

      2. Subwoofer

        We sacrifice a lot for an ever-so-slight gain in convenience these days.

        It’s shocking how lazy people have become.

        1. You don’t like paying $80 for a pound of coffee?

          We have one because my wife is the only one in the house who drinks coffee.

    2. commodious spittoon

      Not that I’m some tree-hugging anti-materialism watermelon ratfink commie, but it reminds me a bit of the Futurama cookie press.

  61. The Late P Brooks

    And what are undecided centrists, etc. going to do, vote 3rd party? ROFL HA HA HA!

    “I, Howard Schultz, do solemnly swear….”

    1. commodious spittoon

      This is a few weeks old, and the sample size is small, but it supports the case for Trump’s reelection. Trump’s reelection chance outstrips his job performance polling, and he does even better when paired against likely Dem candidates.

      In each state, Trump’s job approval ratings are not at all predictive of how he fares in ballot tests. In South Carolina, Trump’s job approval rating is 50 percent. He gets 52 percent against Biden, 54 percent against Sanders and 56 percent against Harris. That’s a six-point gap between his job approval and his best ballot test showing.

      In Michigan and Wisconsin, Trump’s job approval ratings are much lower, but his gap is even higher. His job approval in both states is low — 41 percent in Wisconsin and only 40 percent in Michigan. But Trump receives 46 percent of the vote against Biden in both states and gets 48 percent and 47 percent against Sanders in Wisconsin and in Michigan, respectively. Against Harris, Trump gets 50 percent in Wisconsin and 49 percent in Michigan. That’s a nine-point increase in both cases over his seemingly paltry job approval ratings.

  62. LJW

    Need advice. If interviewing for a job which had no start date demands in the posting, what would be a reasonable request for a start date. Would 2 months from the offer be unreasonable? I ask because in my current job I have a bonus coming up, which is forfeited if you resign voluntarily before a certain date.

    1. You could tell the new company that tidbit about the bonus and ask if the timetable works for them.

      1. Democratic Hitler

        Agree. Treat is as a negotiating point. If they want you bad enough to want you sooner, maybe they can arrange a signing bonus to make up for the bonus you’d miss at the old place.

        Not saying you have to “play hardball”, just make it sound like you’re open to discussing options / negotiating.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        This is what I’ve done in the past.

        “Hey, I have a giant bonus coming up in two months. It is really too much for me to walk away from. I’d really like to make sure everyone is aware of this important date.”

        I had one company tell me that they wanted to start so badly that they’d pay the bonus. I just had to show them how much it would be. Other companies were OK with waiting the time period.

        Besides the speed at which HR moves, I bet two months would result in them saying “Don’t be so pushy, we can’t have a cube, a laptop and your phone set up that quickly!”

        1. commodious spittoon

          At least one of y’all had a story about spending a week on the clock waiting for a login. Or something like that.

          1. Kibbled K, I believe. On her most recent job change, was stuck for some time unable to do much of anything for that reason.

          2. ChipsnSalsa

            procedures were followed, approvals were obtained.

          3. R C Dean

            Fortunately, any new minions in my department get their credentials on their second day (first day is orientation). I suspect it has something to do with my title and the direct line-of-sight I have on my minions, but hey, whatever works.

          4. ChipsnSalsa

            direct line-of-sight

            Through a scope?

          5. R C Dean

            That would be my line-of-sight on HR and IT.

          6. Nephilium

            About a month all told here from when I was hired to when I could actually support the company that I was supposed to be supporting.

    2. AlmightyJB

      Not sure but I would definitely add the caveat that it’s negotiable.

    3. R C Dean

      I don’t think 2 months is unreasonable. A month’s notice is pretty much the minimum most employer’s want for anything other than a fungible, easily replacable employee. That can go up to 90 days as the “minimum” expected notice for a top-level employee (c-suiters and maybe notch below). They should be understanding of the bonus, and if they are in that big a hurry, they can pay you the equivalent amount as a signing bonus.

    4. Nephilium

      I’d bring it up during the interview process (second or third interview), and just mention that you’ll need to give notice to your current employer and would like to know when they are looking to fill this position.

    5. hate_speech

      I would just tell them you have a project you want to finish and wouldn’t mind taking a week or two off in between jobs since you haven’t had a vacation in awhile.

      I would hesitate to mention the bonus, but I guess it depends on your read on the new company. If they seem reasonable then go ahead. I would just worry some idiot would interpret that as ‘LJW is just a greedy mercenary, screwing his former employer!’ rather than ‘LJW has earned a bonus and just needs to meet the formalities to collect!’

      1. I don’t think anybody is going to ding him for wanting to collect his bonus. Anybody can put themselves in his shoes and see how it makes sense for him to align the timetable to get the bonus.

    6. Gustave Lytton

      Is the interview scheduled or are you just applying now? Because two months from application to offer isn’t that long of a period. Also, is the bonus actually paid on that date?

      1. LJW

        Going on second interview next week.

    7. Subwoofer

      You can always slow walk the interview process. They’re clearly not in a rush, so no need to move super fast.

  63. Rhywun

    Despite the fact that research shows sin taxes don’t work, lawmakers in Shaheen’s own state of New Hampshire are proposing draconian taxes on e-cigarettes and vaping devices.

    Sin taxes “work” at their actual goal, which is feeding the maw of government with tax dollars extracted from easy targets.

  64. hate_speech

    I’ve been thinking maybe I should get a 2nd job. Help drive down the unemployment numbers. You know, just do my part for 2020.

    1. commodious spittoon

      How are you going to claw your way into the shrinking middle class (or stay there) unless you’re working two jobs and driving for Lyft on the side? It’s like you don’t even want to pay three grand a month for that 400sqft walk-up on the UES.

  65. Suthenboy

    I haven’t kept up with the news lately but now I see Trump is trying to get Obamacare tossed entirely. Good Lord, if he pulls that off (unlikely) in spite of all the republican squishes that swore they would do it and dropped the ball there is no way in hell he could lose in 2020.

    1. R C Dean

      Trump is trying to get Obamacare tossed entirely.

      The declaration by DOJ that they won’t defend it in the current litigation is symbolic. There are lawyers arguing that it should be upheld, working, I believe, for some of the states.

      Its a very interesting argument, though, that SCOTUS upheld it as an exercise of the taxing power, but now there is no “tax”/ penalty, so the law has no Constitutional basis. There is a lot of handwaving over severability by its defenders, which I think will provide the bullshit excuse to uphold it.

      Prediction: the Court of Appeals upholds OCare, and SCOTUS declines the appeal. The only thing that keeps this from being certain is that this case is going to the Fifth Circuit.

      1. Suthenboy

        “…bullshit excuse to uphold it.”
        Every time I think about John Roberts I can feel my face getting hot.

      2. Subwoofer

        If the left can file all their lawfare suits in the 9th, why couldn’t the right file in the 5th?

  66. Suthenboy

    Shopping for the grandchildren. It will be a few years before they are ready but…which one?

    I am thinking this one – https://www.browning.com/products/firearms/rifles/bl-22/current-production/bl22-micro-midas.html

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      I didn’t realize Browning still makes lever action .22s-me likey. CZ makes some nice bolt action rimfires if you don’t want to get quite so spendy.

      1. Suthenboy

        I am looking at CZ now…their shotguns. I really like a side by side but for the kids I may go with a semi-auto. CZ makes a very nice side by side with multiple gauge options. Very tempting. In the case of semi-auto I may go back and look at the Brownings. I am a big Browning fan.

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          I’ve heard good things about their shotguns but you should be aware they’re rebranded Turkish manufacture guns (or at least they were a couple of years ago when I was looking) if that’s something that matters to you.

  67. Gustave Lytton

    Internet gets woke

    https://easydns.com/blog/2019/04/01/easydns-social-justice-pricing-goes-into-effect-today/

    (I expect the whiners will make their lives hell)

    1. R C Dean

      Nice. Be sure to click through to the explainer video.

      1. I miss the days when it was easy to spot the people who were pulling pranks on the first day of the new fiscal year.

    2. libertarianjoe

      April Fools?

      You know it’s really getting bad when you can’t even tell if they’re serious or not.

    3. ChipsnSalsa

      4/1

      They’ll probably get a bunch of blowback and end up giving discounted pricing.

    4. commodious spittoon

      Fairness Memorandum and Learning (“FML”)

      Heheh.