Monday Morning Linkings of Swiss

A cry for our times.

 

Looks like another day of living off coffee and grimly holding on to my temper, from lack of sleep. The links quality may reflect this. But I get an alleged large step toward relief tomorrow morning, so by next week…maybe we will progress to mediocre links! Huzzah.

But what you get this morning is right here:

  • “I dunno, shall we call it a draw?” Both sides realize, the other just won’t seem to quit, and cannot succeed…so maybe a little jaw-jaw? Of course, please note this would be round seven, of this current set of blatherings.
  • So…who has been missing the past 6 months, only to return lately?
  • Um…”led to prostitution”? Ma’am, you were already there.
  • Grandpa Gulag outflanks Lieawatha on the left.

Music, I leave to the commentariat. You know what to do.

Comments

532 responses to “Monday Morning Linkings of Swiss”

  1. Tres Cool

    Hail Confoederatio Helvetica !

    1. Darn straight!

  2. You know what to do

    I do?

    *looks around in confusion*

    1. Find the music that will annoy others the most – post it!

      1. But… I don’t have audio at work!

        *goes to pieces in an overdramatic fashion*

        1. Count Potato

          What computer in 2019 doesn’t have audio?

          Anyway, I think you can a sound blaster for a 386.

          1. It’s not the computer, there is a headphone jack… but that doesn’t mean it’s in use.

      2. That’s my bailiwick. 😉

        1. straffinrun

          At least yours aren’t mind numbing like The Spin Doctors that was posted the other day.

        1. robc

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXvvuP_xef0

          Original is bad, metal cover doesn’t improve anything.

          1. Rhywun

            Oh, that’s heinous. Well done.

          2. robc

            The thing is, most of his metal covers are pretty good. I posted the Sultans of Swing one the other day, its excellent.

            That one though…wow.

          3. Count Potato

            He is still a slop drummer.

          4. The Last American Hero

            Maybe if he didn’t spend so much time playing guitar, bass, singing, and producing, he’d have time to work on tightening up his chops?

        2. l0b0t

          I’ll counter with the band that inspired a Mr. Show sketch – Tickle-Toon Typhoon.

          1. Rhywun

            Oh my God.

    2. straffinrun

      Oh, you’ve read the lion drill instructions.

      1. l0b0t

        That video was fabulous. The rubbernecking lions were like icing on the cake.

  3. >>I noticed that there was a hole in his pants and he wasn’t wearing any underwear, so you could see everything.

    STEVE SMITH SAVE TIME DON”T WEAR PANTS

  4. Festus

    Feel better, Swiss!

    1. Tonio

      ^This

    2. Thirded. Hopefully the shot is comprehensively effective.

    3. Aloysious

      Yes. Your cheesiness is much appreciated.

    1. Festus

      Wow! Haven’t heard that one in a dog’s age. Nice pull, Tres!

      1. See why I left it to the commentariat?

  5. Count Potato

    “But I get an alleged large step toward relief tomorrow morning, so by next week…maybe we will progress to mediocre links!”

    So you are saying the necks links will be better?

    1. I think he’s saying he’ll give it a shot.

      1. You guys are a pain in the neck.

        1. Not Adahn

          Stop needling them about their puns.

      1. MikeS

        I love the new(ish) narrowed gaze gif

        1. Tejicano

          I think Lee Van Cleef did it better

          1. Well, sure…I mean, if your nickname is “Angel Eyes” you had better…

  6. For Swizzy:

    A fortress disguised as a country

    Those who think of Switzerland as a quaint land of cuckoo clocks and chocolate are sorely mistaken. To paraphrase Voltaire’s bon mot about Prussia, Switzerland is a giant fortress, disguised as a country.

    In the late 1930’s, as one European nation after another bowed down to Hitler’s demands, the Swiss military and its popular rifle clubs, banded together and decided their nation would not bend the knee as the Czechs, Dutch, Norwegians, Belgians, and then the French had done.

    A feverish programme of fortress construction was begun across the Alps. Some 900,000 troops were mobilised. Orders went out from General Henri Guisan: “Leave your families behind in the lowlands. Man our mountain forts. We have no place or food for civilians in them. Fight to your last cartridge; then use your bayonets. No surrender!”

    Every road and bridge was mined; all mountain passes were rigged with explosives. Particularly so the rail lines and tunnels that linked Germany to its erstwhile ally, Italy.

    Hitler was furious. He denounced the Swiss as “insolent herdsmen”. Mussolini, Hitler’s ally, rightfully feared tangling with the tough Swiss mountaineers who had ravaged Italy during the Renaissance. The Pope’s Swiss Guards are a memento of the era of “Furia Helvetica”.

    1. Don Escaped Texas

      but they’re suddenly going backwards

      The government had warned voters that Switzerland, which is not a member of the European Union but follows many of its rules, could lose its membership in the Schengen area — which allows free movement among 26 European countries — if it rejected stricter gun rules. . . . final results showed that almost 64 percent voted in favor of tighter gun controls, in line with what opinion polls had predicted. Only the citizens of the Italian-speaking region of Switzerland rejected the gun initiative.

      Solidarity will undermine independence.

      1. The rural cantons will quietly disregard what Geneva Genf and Zurich voted for.

        1. robc

          If need be, Uri, Schwyz, and Unterwalden can start things all over again.

      2. Rhywun

        They are quietly becoming just another province of Europea, aren’t they. I wonder how that will work out for them.

    2. Pine_Tree

      I had to go to Geneva for work about 2-3 years ago. I was there for most of a week, and I’m not sure I saw a single Swiss person.

      As a history geek, my first thought was that if Switzerland ever faced an existential crisis, this built-in fifth column would drive an unfortunate outcome.

      Or maybe there’s enough of Switzerland left to stand up to it. Dunno.

      1. Genf and Zurich are not really Swiss – very much more “international” – lots of us knuckleheads that are involved with business, etc. Get away from those two cities…it is very Swiss.

  7. commodious spittoon
    1. “Lion escape drill” sounds like a machine for boring tunnels out of an enclosure.

      1. We are Lion Escape Drill and we are here to rock you!

    2. Tejicano

      “Wait! Why am I the only one who didn’t get running shoes?”

      1. “Oh, you forgot your cape of raw steaks.”

        1. Festus

          I liked the part where the “lion” charges the flimsy barricade and the staffer just dies of fright and lays down dead.

    3. And the Nancy Sinatra Squad is powerless to stop it!

  8. AlexinCT

    Grandpa Gulag outflanks Lieawatha on the left.

    At this point can we sop pretending these people are serious about anything but getting power at all costs and are willing to promise any and all sorts of destructive and impossible schemes and scams to rick-roll enough idiots into voting for them?

    1. PieInTheSky

      The next one should promise to give back the money to the suckers who paid off the debt

      1. Tres Cool

        +1 Charles Ponzi

        1. Fourscore

          Leave my Social Security out of this !

      2. pistoffnick

        I guess I was a fool for working 2 jobs to pay my loans off.

        1. Yup.

          But we’re all in the same boat. I don’t know if anyone brought beer, but there’s definately hard booze somewhere.

      3. creech

        As soon as Santa Claus can prove he’s a U.S. citizen, he will enter the race and sweep all these pikers and poseurs right out of the primaries.

    2. Ownbestenemy

      Lets say this nut gets the presidency and Congress. Will he accept the consequences of his Wall Street tax to pay off student debt that will enivatbly empty out Mr and Mrs Public’s 401K, IRAs, investments, etc.

      Ok you can laugh now.

  9. Count Potato

    “subway masturbator”

    Can you put that on a resume?

    1. In some places you may be required to, if you’ve been caught.

      1. AlexinCT

        “I AM TAKING IT OUT OF MY PANTS!….”

        “I AM DOING WHAT MY MOMMY TOLD ME NOT TO DO….”

        /grunting and slapping noises

        1. *quietly backs out of room*

          1. AlexinCT

            Stay on the subject bro…

            You need to back out of the subway train or station…

    2. commodious spittoon

      Jared Fogle’s?

    3. The Last American Hero

      Only if your certifications and union dues are up to date. NYC Subway is a closed shop.

  10. “Claims men were using sugar baby websites as a way to pay students for sex”

    Holy shit, men 20 years older than you pay thousands and expect more than just your sparkling personality!? Say it ain’t so!!

    1. AlexinCT

      What bothers me are the people that actually think this cunt didn’t know what she was doing. Women know damned well why guys spend time and money on them, and the type this girl is milk it for all it is worth. There are plenty of idiots out there wiling to give women their money thinking that will buy them anything but her scorn and her trying to take even more from them.

      1. Festus

        Sad but true.

      2. Contrarian P

        That’s the thing that baffles me. Women as depicted currently are strong, smart, independent and can beat any man at their own game while simultaneously being naive, innocent, vulnerable snowflakes that need to be protected from those rapacious menfolk. There’s no way to square that circle. It seems whichever one is benefiting the woman at the time should be embraced without question.

        I have a very hard time believing that this lady didn’t know exactly what she was doing. Once everything goes to hell, then it’s time to pull out the “I was victimized by this evil website” card.

        1. Tonio

          “It seems whichever one is benefiting the woman at the time should be embraced without question.”

          Indeed. But you should know better than to expect ideological consistency.

          1. “Whatever benefits the woman at the time” is a consistant position.

          2. AlexinCT

            Seems to explain the whole “fight patriarchy” fake movement.

        2. Festus

          Wimmin like this are an extremely small but incredibly loud sub-set of the population in my experience. They just have a shiny new bullhorn in the age of Trump.

      3. Tonio

        At no point does she claim that anyone misrepresented. Nobody offered her a long-term contract, which she found disappointing.

      4. Tejicano

        I’m pretty sure they all know exactly what the story is. What’s sad is how they navigate around it and present the proper political talking points. All it is to them is another opportunity to signal their woke virtue.

      5. Not Adahn

        but… but… she “grew up on Stoops Estate in Burnley, one of the most impoverished postcodes in the UK” so there’s no way she could have known about the concept of paying money for sex!

        1. An area so poor that they only had stoops and no buildings?

      6. cyto

        Living in South Florida I’ve seen loads of women like this. Even the ones who are not on some website that is barely a fig leaf for prostitution are pretty upfront about it.

        I was having dinner with a couple of business associates at a fancy restaurant with sidewalk dining in fort Lauderdale one night when a couple of young ladies approached us. They began asking us questions about what we do for a living. When the lawyer gave up his profession, they jumped on it like sharks on a whale carcass. Apparently they weren’t sophisticated enough to know that he was working for the other two guys at the table.

        we actually went as far as to ask about his bank account. It was pretty shameless. we saw them later that night talking to a couple of 50 something year old dudes at a club. They were probably in their late twenties at the time.

        A very briefly dated a girl who played that game. She was a smoking hot Colombian who had small roles in telli novellas for telemundo.

        1. cyto

          It took me about two weeks to figure out what was up. she had a bunch of guys on the line, paying for her rent, paying for her car payment, whatever. She was actually pretty amazing – she had an incredible talent for getting people to do what she wanted.

          So I don’t really have a lot of sympathy for some chick who spent a few years taking advantage of men who are desperate for attention. I’m not sure why she expected that people should just give her stuff for no reason. In fact, I’m fairly sure that she understood all along that they weren’t giving her stuff for no reason.

          Funny that we want to paint the guys who were handing her cash just to spend time with her as predators and and the shark who manipulated them into forking over huge wads of cash as a victim.

          1. Donation Not Taxation

            Libertarians may not like Ann Coulter, but you want to see if you agree with her about liberalism and bullies claiming to be victimized by the bullied.

      7. Fourscore

        “this girl will milk it for all it is worth.”

        Isn’t this the idea? Hey, at least she was paying her student debt.

        To paraphrase:

        Prez Lizzie Warren took her axe
        Gave the student debts…

        1. Prez Lizzie Warren took her axe
          Gave the student debts… taxpayer forty whacks.

          1. Fourscore

            Good call

  11. My Husband Wants to Watch Me Have Sex With Another Man

    One of the things we’ve discussed semi-seriously is my husband watching while I have sex with another man. He says this would be a huge turn-on, and I am certainly turned on by the prospect. We’ve also talked about our fears and reservations about actually following through with such an arrangement, so for now this fantasy is fulfilled by simply talking about it (what would turn us on, what I would do, what I’d want the guy to do to me, etc.). Where I’m struggling especially with this idea is that as much as I am genuinely turned on by my husband, I still find myself developing crushes/admiring other men.

    The biggest turn on for me in this whole fantasy is thinking about the rush of sleeping with someone new for the first time—basically the excitement that comes with the whole gamut of experiencing new sensations with someone unfamiliar to you. While my husband views this as perhaps a one-time thing, it has highlighted to me that I am regularly turned on by the thought of sleeping with someone else. My question is—why do I still develop crushes and find myself pretty strongly attracted to other men when my husband already ticks all of the boxes? Is this craving for novelty a sign that things aren’t as perfect as I think they are, or is this normal? If so, how do I remain happy in a monogamous marriage (I’m not open to opening up our marriage) when I crave this novelty?

    1. AlexinCT

      What do you think would be her reaction if her husband told her that he expected this to be a tit for tat. She bangs some other dude, and then he gets to bang another chick…

      1. Tonio

        He may have initiated it. Apparently the whole Hot Wife / Cuck Husband thing is, well, a thing. “Cleanup on aisle three.” Heh.

    2. PieInTheSky

      I think this is just alt-right bait at this point.

    3. Response to this scenario: “You go grrrl! You’re just exploring your inherent non-monogamous-ness!”
      Response if letter was from a man: “You sicken me with your cis-hetero toxic male entitlement. Women don’t exist solely for your evil penis’ pleasure.”

      PS: I thought Slate went out of business?

      1. Festus

        I think Salon is the one in deep financial Doo-Doo. Slate can’t be far behind at this point.

    4. straffinrun

      “, what I would do, what I’d want the guy to do to me”

      Wait, wut?

      1. AlexinCT

        They talk about who does or gets the dirty Sanchezes, Cleveland Steamers, doing the Houdini, and such other cool games, man.

        1. straffinrun

          I can sympathize. My wife would like for me to do the dishes, cook something special for dinner, clean out the shower drain. There are limits, however.

          1. >>clean out the shower drain

            euphemism alert!

          2. AlexinCT

            I can do dishes and cook dinner, and actually wouldn’t mind, but my pipes better be getting cleaned after that, if you know what I mean…

            And I will gladly then go to sleep on the couch even.

          3. Tejicano

            Yeah, I’m never really sure if my wife really likes my Mexican cooking or my BBQ or is just happy to have somebody else doing the cooking.

          4. straffinrun

            Heh. My wife loves my authentic Wisc/Mex cooking. Surprised Mexican isn’t more popular here because even my crappy version of it is always a hit with the locals.

          5. Sensei

            Hot dish?

          6. Not Adahn

            Interesting. Is the presentation prettied up from the norteno norm?

          7. Gustave Lytton

            authentic Wisc/Mex cooking

            Brat tacos with a side of beer?

          8. But with even less seasoning than I’m accused of using.

          9. ChipsnSalsa

            Tacos, Wisco style

            https://www.spendwithpennies.com/tater-tot-taco-bake/

            Note: enchilada sauce can be replaced with ketchup if relatives from Chetek are coming to town.

          10. Pope Jimbo

            Uffda Chips! What sort of fucked up recipe site is that?

            Are hash browns and tater tots the same thing?

            While they’re not technically the same thing, you can certainly use either for this tater tot casserole (or even sub in mashed potatoes if you have them on hand)!

            Are you fucking kidding me? This is why I stick to hot dish and not that casserole shit (whatever it is).

          11. Sensei

            Can you get proper ingredients?

          12. It is difficult to find a proper substitute for Grade F meat.

          13. Tejicano

            One of the reasons I have endevored to have access to shopping on the US bases here.

          14. straffinrun

            Bastard. At least Seiyu has Don Taco’s and something called “Salsa”.

          15. Sensei

            I’ve read peanut butter can also be tough to get.

            That surprised me!

          16. Tonio

            Silicone tub mushroom. Makes cleanout easy and cheap enough to replace when it becomes nasty. Can also soak in bleach to clean if you’re on a tight budget.

          17. Private Chipperbot

            Silicone tub mushroom

            That sounds like an activation code.

          18. We are Silicone Tub Mushroom and we are here to make you feel sad and stuff …

  12. Count Potato

    “A student who turned to sugar daddy dating after getting into debt while studying at university has revealed how it led to prostitution – and she was left fearing for her life and in need of therapy.”

    The slutty make-up probably isn’t helping.

  13. PieInTheSky

    Um…”led to prostitution”? Ma’am, you were already there. – ehm I mean would, but not for 1 grand. You can probably buy a hotter Moldavian chick for that kind of scratch. Then again you have the extra cost of soundproofing the basement.

    1. Festus

      That went to a pretty dark place in a hurry. I like it!

      1. STEVE SMITH VISIT DARK PLACES IN HURRY. NEW ORFICE TO CONQUER!

        1. Old Man With Candy

          I already gave at the orfice.

          1. *narrows gaze*

    2. Drake

      Yep – Judging by the pictures, the £1,000 per date thing is a wild exaggeration. Hope her therapist provides some makeup advise.

  14. AlexinCT

    Someone recommended I buy stock in patchouli companies, what with the democratic convention right around the corner, and I am passing that on…

  15. Raphael

    Once again, screw you Bernie on behalf of this guy who worked for scholarships to get into college.

    1. Look, he’s pandering to the people who are most likely to advocate socialism – useless twits who have useless degrees and a stack of debt weighing on their sense of entitlement.

      1. AlexinCT

        Socialism is about appealing to those angry that the choices they made had bad consequences they didn’t want to deal with – always after the fact – and telling these angry jealous/envious fucks that you will fuck over those people that made the right choices, to help the morons that did not feel they brought those uppity people that did the right thing just as low as their studies degree having, coffee slinging career limiting selves.

        1. Festus

          That’s what pisses me off the most. Own your mistakes or they will own you. I made some very bad choices early on in life but the consequences are mine to deal with and mine alone. I don’t expect anyone to “help”.

          1. AlexinCT

            Yeah, that part about owning them… That is hard work…

            Much easier to blame others, and then straddle them with the bill too.

    2. Drake

      “Vote for me – I’ll raid the Treasury and give to you”

      – the end-stage of every democracy.

  16. straffinrun

    18 years and counting. Another loya jirgoff should solve it.

    1. Tonio

      [golf clap] for “loya jirgoff”

    2. Ozymandias

      Well done. I used to like when those things ended with some dirt poor Afghan being told he had to pay an unpayable amount of money to some other dirt poor tribesmen to end the blood feud… or else. Just old school Mafia justice, frontier-style.

  17. PieInTheSky

    So there is something called Lime which started dumping electric scooters all over Bucharest. You can use them by downloading an app and paying 0.6 Lei per minute. I am thinking of trying one although they seem dangerous and one could lose an eye. But the funny part is that, being Romania, more than two dozen were stolen in the first month, which is funny because they were all found through gps. What were the thieves thinking, that there is no way to track those?

    Also, if let us say a certain minority may be over-represented in people getting in trouble with the law over appropriating Lime scooters, is Lime racist?

    1. AlexinCT

      They had one of these green bike thingies in Hartford CT. There were these bikes you could rent and ride using some app. All I ever saw on them was homeless people that had managed to disassemble to locking mechanism. The whole idiotic thing lasted all of about 1 month before all the bikes were sold for parts by the crack and meth heads.

      1. Sounds like the problem is Hartford.

        1. AlexinCT

          Actually the problem is with the idiots that see a city with a large homeless population and think something like this will work.

          1. Tonio

            I’d be interested in the funding – specifically, did the city pitch in for the bikes? Because here in Richmond that bike thing is run as a concession but subsidized by the city. I suspect that the bike companies well know it won’t make money and that their business model is based on taxpayer subsidies.

          2. Chipwooder

            And they’re all over the place now. First the bikes, now those yellow scooters.

          3. AlexinCT

            Tax payers payed for it all Tonio. And the company the city contracted was an ultra expensive green company that had an iron clad legal agreement making the city responsible for security of these vehicles. The meth and crack heads had them a ball. I only saw the bikes being used by them, and they then took them and hid them. Hartford being a dead city after hours or on weekends, they were picked up after the homeless people broke the security mechanism off, and were all gone in a month tops.

            So the people that spend a fortune on the contract, virtue signaling their green bonafides, and telling us how wise the investment was, despite being told otherwise, all blamed the people that told them this was not going to work, and not the idiocy of doing this the way they did.

          4. I’m Here To Help

            Amazingly, it has worked fairly well in Tampa (and we have a huge homeless population here). There are three separate companies that popped up pretty much simultaneously and have those infernal contraptions all over downtown.

            I don’t mind the actual devices, but the insufferable hipsters I see on them. I may have accidentally adjusted my gym bag just as one was whizzing past me from behind (he was only a foot or so to the side, and gave no verbal warning, so I felt no sympathy when he swerved right into the corner of a building).

        2. Rhywun

          Yeah, the bike thing is pretty successful in NYC. Privately-financed and expanding. Might even hit my neighborhood some day.

          1. l0b0t

            I’m throwing them out of my yard every damn day (corner house, on the beach, on the block with the subway stop; I really want to woodchipper all the walkthrough litterbugs). People just drop them and walk away; it’s pretty cool for those who don’t want the hassle of urban bike storage. There is some known hack because I always see gangs of local youth cruising around in packs.

          2. Rhywun

            They must be swallowing the losses. I would hope they’re working on that cuz the fees aren’t exactly cheap as it is. Maybe train a camera on the stations where the bikes tend to go missing?

      2. Festus

        Same thing happened here. Most of the bikes were gone after a week, doubtless disassembled in various Meth shacks.

        1. Tonio

          The components on those bikes, at least the ones here, are pretty proprietary, probably by design.

    2. PieInTheSky

      We already have 3 companies Lime-s, Wolf-e and e-twow

    3. Indianapolis was buried in those things. I think Austin, TX is too.

      1. Red Pill Matt

        Sadly they are in Austin too. I had to throw my elbow into a scooter-rider’s chest as he came around a corner downtown riding at its top speed. Also, sadly, he survived.

        1. Not Adahn

          That could have had humerus results.

          1. *narrows gaze*

    4. Pope Jimbo

      We have some of those electric scooters. The company caused a ruckus last year because they just dropped them off downtown. They didn’t go to the city council and ask for permission or anything!

      Luckily, sanity has been restored and Minneapolis now has a proper program for electric scooters.

      “Beyond the scooter distribution requirements, operators are required to have low-income pricing programs and alternative access options for people who don’t have smartphones or require a cash payment option. They are also required to have ongoing education and outreach on safe riding and proper parking behavior, as well as the previously mentioned equitable pricing and access initiatives,” the city said.

      The goal of the scooter pilot program, according to the city, is “to determine how to best position scooters as a long-term viable transportation option for all in Minneapolis, and align with the work of the Minneapolis Transportation Action Plan update.”

      Suprisingly, the company (Bird) that started the ruckus last year was not considered to be a partner in this new exciting pilot program. The city said it wasn’t because Bird thumbed their nose at them last year. No sir. But because:

      Bird’s responses to questions related to climate, equity, and prosperity goals were below expectations,” the city said.

      1. Tundra

        I was down at Lake Calhoun last week and those fucking things were everywhere. Possibly more obnoxious than cyclists.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Lake Calhoun

          I’m sorry white eye, I have no idea what you are talking about.

          1. Tundra

            It will always be Lake Calhoun to me.

          2. *looks up issue*

            It is Lake Calhoun, there’s no way anyone is going to use that… other term.

          3. Rhywun

            I thought they’re bringing the old name back?

          4. Tundra

            Who the fuck knows. The stupid Park Board wanted to change all the street signs, too, but that was quickly slapped down.

            These people are mentally ill.

            It’s a beautiful lake, by the way.

            We have a string of several urban lakes that are a must-see if you ever make it out here.

          5. AlexinCT

            I have found that whenever you see people demanding such public works changes, one of their relatives is the one landing a lucrative government contract doing unneeded work (like replacing expensive street name signs or building a town park).

          6. Pope Jimbo

            My office named all its meeting rooms after Minnesoda lakes. I always make sure to respond to any meeting invites to Lake Calhoun with the appropriate snark about it being Bde Maka Ska.

            So far everyone gets the joke and rolls their eyes about Minneapolis’ efforts to rename Calhoun.

    5. The Last American Hero

      Here’s the problem I’ve seen – you need to have a helmet with you (SLD). When those things hit a bump, they are not forgiving and you can go flying off the front end. Maybe not an issue for Pie, since he can turn into a bat.

      The other problem is no odometers, so the company only fixes the scooters if someone reports a mechanical problem. Which is fine except when you learn the hard way the throttle has 2 positions – off and full speed, and the brakes don’t work.

    6. Hyperion

      “So there is something called Lime which started dumping electric scooters all over Bucharest.”

      Not sure if is the same company, but those things are all over Balmer too. I mean, until they get stolen.

    1. Festus

      I was going to respond to the cuck-lady above with the advice that she join a knitting circle but may have to rethink that notion.

    2. Donation Not Taxation

      For those who can’t be bothered reading the article:
      Ravelry is the most popular site online for crocheting and knitting enthusiasts. “The word ‘inclusive,’ it would seem, has been redefined in true leftist Orwellian fashion to mean ‘excluding half the country.’ The 44.6 percent of Americans who approve of Trump are all — every last one — white supremacists, according to Ravelry.”

    3. Pope Jimbo

      Fucking knitters. They are the same people who don’t want people to visit India.

      The initial comments on Templer’s blog post were supportive, but quickly, knitters and fans began to criticize her tone. “Karen, I’d ask you to re-read what you wrote and think about how your words feed into a colonial/imperialist mindset toward India and other non-Western countries,” wrote commenter Alex. “Multiple times you compare the idea of going to India to the idea of going to another planet — how do you think a person from India would feel to hear that?”

      1. how do you think a person from India would feel to hear that?

        From the Indians I know – they’d likely agree. It’s a very different place from here.

        1. Chipwooder

          Seriously – the Indians I know (and Glen Allen has a whole bunch of them – the Hindu Center of Virginia is right down the street from my house) are pretty hardheaded about India. That, after all, is why they moved here in the first place. They have no gauzy romantic notions about the place.

      2. Rhywun

        “Please to be coming over and spending your money?”

        WTF is wrong with people.

        1. Dystentery.

          Oh, you meant these toxically woke people.

    4. Rebel Scum

      The reason for the ban, according to Ravelry, is that “We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy. Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy.”

      Surely they can cite an example or two that demonstrates that Trump and his supporters are white-supremacists.

  18. 30 minutes have elapsed, the tits are ready, Mammary Monday may commence!

    https://tinyurl.com/y5ve2rph

    1. Raphael

      I for one would like to hold up the puppies of 9, 11, 17, 22, and 30 for them. Easing their burdens is just the moral thing to do.

    2. I’m diggin’ #3, who seems like a fun, young version of Meryl Streep, #11, because she appreciates a nice cardigan, #20, because those ladies understand how important it is to know how to swim, and #33 because she looks like an alternate universe version of Sissy Spacek in her mid- to late-30s.

  19. Rebel Scum

    Linkings of Swiss

    So they’re good on a smokehouse burger?

    1. AlexinCT

      Most people want freedom for themselves, but not for others…

    2. Rasilio

      No it isn’t.

      The number of people who are cool with drug legalization and gay rights and also anti abortion is dwarfed by the number of people who hold the same position on the first 2 propositions and are either pro choice, or simply believe the state has no role in abortion.

      Yes if the LP adopted a pro life stance they would gain votes from some new people, but they would lose the votes of even more and it would be a net loss in voters for them.

      Of course since both the pro life and pro choice positions are supportable under the NAP the LP probably should not have an official position on abortion either way.

    3. Hyperion

      “Open letter to the Libertarian Party: Your pro-abortion position is costing you votes”

      What votes?

  20. Tundra

    You know what to do.

    Yes sir, I do.

    SPOON!

  21. Certified Public Asshat

    Sanders’ effort at one-upsmanship on student loans, named the College For All Act, would cancel $1.6 trillion of debt and save the average borrower about $3,000 a year, according to materials obtained by The Associated Press.

    The result would be a stimulus that allows millennials in particular to invest in homes and cars that they wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford. It would cost $2.2 billion and be paid for – and then some – by a series of taxes on such things as stock trades, bonds and derivatives, according to the proposal.

    Eliminating one debt so they can get more.

    1. straffinrun

      Fuck that. Tax the universities that got fat on those loans. Tax the banks that got fat on those loans. Put the people who benefited from that stupid system on the hook.

      1. Raphael

        This right here. Shame they’d rather just fuck over the rest of the American people instead.

      2. Bill it directly to the universities from which the useless degrees were issued and the debt accrued.

        1. straffinrun

          Probably unconstitutional, but I love it.

      3. AlexinCT

        Get government out of that racket. There is a direct correlation with the massive inflation blowing curve of cost increases for tuition and the fact government keeps throwing cash at people that would not be given the money if someone was doing a risk analysis of the investment.

        1. straffinrun

          Hammer the junkies and let the dealer keep his cash and continue dealing all under the umbrella of a corrupt government. Great timeline, ain’t it?

          1. Donation Not Taxation

            The Road to Hammer Junkie – YouTube
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIUgfW-LiQQ

          2. AlexinCT

            Well, we had a near economic collapse because people that live in fantasyland decided to use the power of government to force lending entities to give money – to buy a house of all things – to people not only unqualified, but likely to default and then leave others to pay for it, and after that, they just went back to doubling back on this stupid idea.

            What makes you think that these same people will find any problem with a system today that basically gives money to people that are going to fail or piss it away on dumb ass degrees?

      4. The Other Kevin

        Up until about a year ago, I had no idea how big some of endowments are for some of the big-name schools. Some of them are sitting on BILLIONS of dollars from donations. And yet they have no problem jacking up the price and letting students take out huge loans. I’m with straffin, let’s tax these endowments.

        10 Universities With Big Endowments

        1. Don Escaped Texas

          I think we should be pleased of private institutions that run a profit and maintain a balance sheet. The alternative is your being taxed for the land grant system.

          The question shouldn’t be: who shall we tax; it should be: remember back when we would tax people for services that were even worse than these?!1!?

          1. The Last American Hero

            Yeah, except the part where the university is getting a shit ton of federal tax dollars when they’re sitting on billions.

        2. AlexinCT

          This phenomenon of private institutions having endowments that are worth billions of dollars, while neither investing in keeping/expanding educators that add value (no studies types obviously) nor keeping the cost down for the students, seems to be present even in the public system. I have often pointed out that the tax & spenders could really get some big cash for their scams if they simply raided these endowments, but you should see the reaction you get pointing that out. These centers of indoctrination of mediocrity, like the unions, are considered off limits, unlike the private sector idiots.

          1. The Other Kevin

            There’s something really perverse about the left’s idea of rich business owners sitting on piles of cash that should be used to help students, when these “noble institutions” actually are sitting on piles of cash that should be used to help students.

          2. AlexinCT

            It’s different when someone that is a bonified leftist does it. Their motives are pure/better…

    2. Contrarian P

      If you were that good with math, you probably wouldn’t have ended up super deep in debt for a degree that isn’t usable to generate a suitable return.

      Yeah, you’ll have your student loan debt wiped out, but then your 401k won’t be worth jack because all of its returns are wiped out by these taxes and fees, so you won’t have any money for retirement. But just in time the next “progressive” will be along to propose a universal retirement program. Damn, it’s almost like it’s intentional.

    3. Rhywun

      With millennials greatly outnumbering Gen Xers, it’s only a matter of time.

    4. to invest in homes and cars that they wouldn’t otherwise be able to still can’t afford.

      We’re gonna get absolutely slammed if this idea comes to fruition. We will have my student loans paid off in 2 years, which is right around the time the student loans would be forgiven.

      As always, government is who we screw, together.

      1. Certified Public Asshat

        Yep, someone who cannot afford a $300 student loan payment will somehow magically be able to afford a $500 car payment.

        1. My student loan payments were $500, and my car payments $300.

          1. Certified Public Asshat

            In your case I assume you could also afford both.

    5. Don Escaped Texas

      We should not consider a program from someone who doesn’t know what invest means.

      1. Certified Public Asshat

        Millennial to invest in 60s muscle cars.

  22. Old Man With Candy

    Guten Morgen, Herr Schweizer. Nun habe ich große Schmerzen, weil ich viele schwere Gegenstände ohne deine Hilfe bewegt habe.

    1. ^^^Nazi confirmed.

      1. AlexinCT

        Next he will b telling us how bad the Jews are or something…

        1. Rebel Scum

          I thought they just hated juice from concentrate.

      2. SugarFree

        “No one who speaks German could be an evil man.”

    2. If only I had been there to help. And give Wonder Dog some Pizza.

      1. ElspethFlashman

        Our dog can’t have pizza, as it leads to sonic diarrhea.

        1. AlexinCT

          I had a girlfriend that had that problem… needless to say….

          1. Tejicano

            …she was a bitch?

          2. AlexinCT

            I see what you did there…

            She was actually very nice but the problem just couldn’t be worked out…

      2. Old Man With Candy

        She’s staring at me now, with that accusing, narrowed gaze look.

        “OK, so now, we’re in a hellishly hot place, there’s no Swiss, and I don’t have that wooded acre to shit in. I am planning on eating your eyeballs when you fall asleep.”

    3. Sensei

      Look at Mr. Fancypants with that there foreign keyboard stuff…

      ごますり!

      1. I’m sorry, I don’t speak foreign.

      2. straffinrun

        My dumb joke for that: ”今日、素敵な服ですね。” ”いやだ!ごますりじゃない?” ”違うよ!お世辞です。”

        1. Sensei

          Japanese language (and culture) really does take deflecting compliments to a high art.

          I always have to remember to not say thank you to a compliment, but rather something like:

          “Sou iu koto nai desu yo.” Literally “not what you are saying”.

          1. “Your refusal to accept a complement is an insult to me.”

          2. straffinrun

            “Nice driving gloves.”

          3. “Thanks, I got them from a bargain bin at a department store because I needed something and am a cheap bastard.”

          4. straffinrun

            I just steer into it. “Sono Toori.”

          5. Sensei

            I go with “mochiron” in those cases. Or for variety “touzen”.

          6. Tejicano

            That would explain your popularity with the locals.

          7. Sensei

            Sansei!

    1. Count Potato

      I’m surprised he spoke with CNN.

      Anyway, that gif is awesome.

      1. The Last American Hero

        How did the call sheet for the casting call read?

      2. CCN — whoever that is.

        Again, that Magic branding is terrible.

  23. Rebel Scum

    Bernie Sanders and House progressives are to unveil plans to cancel all student debt, going further than a signature proposal by Senator Elizabeth Warren as the two jockey for support in 2020 Presidential race.

    Moar. “Free”. Shit.

    1. cyto

      So, did anybody bother to read the bill? is Sanders going to cancel student debt the same way that Obama cancelled general motors debt? Namely, by just stealing the money from the lenders?

      Or are we going to print money to just hand to Banks?

      Inquiring-minds-want-to-know!

      1. According to the congressional testimony I heard, private banks have all been driven out of the student loan business by the feds.

        1. AlexinCT

          Why should I know when the hag that is in charge of the congressional banking commission didn’t even know herself?

  24. PieInTheSky

    Is there a maximum productive training volume per session?

    https://mennohenselmans.com/maximum-productive-training-volume-per-session/?fbclid=IwAR0WhfJJtZ1jpjOkYd2ANRaveOTwfKjYSf2b_kv3Fn5BzTfci7jCMIE7nJw

    apparently 9 to 13 sets per muscle group per session

  25. This has been brewing for years.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/06/23/democratic-party-civil-war-donald-trump-column/1525623001/

    They tried to head it off at the pass with “intersectionality” but when your tent has so many interest groups with mutually exclusive goals, it was bound to fall apart sooner or later.

    1. straffinrun

      Just remember Bernie tucking his balls inside as he endorsed Hillary. I think it will be just as close as it was last time.

        1. Rhywun

          I’m still calling it for Harris. Pete! is toast. If they take down Biden, that’s it.

  26. OT: I’ll be in a 3-day (!!) A3 meeting. So instead of doing actual work – I’ll be staring at the wall.

      1. B.P.

        That’s a great album.

        1. Tundra

          Yes. It will be my gym music today.

    1. ElspethFlashman

      Will there be donuts? Punch and pie?

      1. I don’t think Pie will be flying in to attend the meeting.

    2. Not Adahn

      3 is GGGGGG, not A

  27. Donation Not Taxation

    “Debt cancellations would be paid for by taxes on trades, stocks and derivatives”
    It is the responsibility of those racking up the student debt to either pay for it or find others who will voluntarily donate to pay some or all of it off for them. And even if we were to ignore personal responsibility, taxation is theft, and taxation of money labored for is slavery or slavery-adjacent, higher education and financial markets are unrelated. At least a meat tax to pay for government meat inspections would be an involuntary user fee.

    1. cyto

      Yes, this is just obvious and shameless vote-buying. As is the reparations movement that they have brought to the front again.

      1. Donation Not Taxation

        Agreed. In theory (D in the deets), I would not mind a government-run program to pay off student debts or to pay reparations if the money came from voluntary sources.

        1. Gustave Lytton

          I would. If it was privately run, whatever. Of course, it should handled the same as any other gift/income/debt cancellation.

          1. Donation Not Taxation

            Why does it matter if it is government? Thought experiment: Suppose you lived somewhere (there are places this is true) that government has the local monopoly in residential trash/recycling collection, but for commercial customers who use dumpsters or generic equivalent, getting trash picked up is mandatory, but paying government to do it is optional. Would you automatically not consider the government option when deciding who to pay to come around and take away the trash?

          2. Spitefully, I might simply not look at the numbers and reputation of the department of sanitation for [hypoethetical town].

            Though at some point my frugality would force me to do the comparison.

          3. Donation Not Taxation

            Interesting answer.

          4. Gustave Lytton

            Government ran operations are inherently subsidized, and usually directly so. Even if it weren’t, a government sponsored program lends the imprimatur of official endorsement. And to your example, government “competition” is phony. Lower cost of capital, tax exempt status, cross subsidy from residential operations, favorable rule making, and backstopped by the government.

  28. Adolf Hitler had secret all-white Nazi jazz band singing bizarre songs about Churchill

    Jazz was placed on the Nazis’ list of ‘degenerate’ art. But at the same time, Hitler’s infamous propaganda chief Josef Goebbels put together a Nazi Party jazz band who performed well-known swing numbers with the lyrics altered to reflect the party’s anti-Jewish, anti-black, anti-Allies point of view.

    Led by an English speaking German named Karl Schwendler, Charlie and His Orchestra’s Hitler-approved jazz could be picked up on the medium-wave and short-wave bands in Canada, the US and Britain.

    Winston Churchill himself was said to be a fan, finding the lyrics that insulted him hilarious.

    You’re Driving Me Crazy, for example, was repurposed as a comedy number with a (very poor) Churchill impersonator intoning “The Germans Are Driving me Crazy”.

    Venerable jazz standard Bye Bye Blackbird became a dig at Britain which went “Bye Bye Empire”.

    1. AlexinCT

      Is this what gave Eminem his grandiose idea?

    2. ElspethFlashman

      Germans have a sense of humor? Who knew?

  29. Count Potato

    BREAKING: Jon Walsh is an idiot.

    “But wait, @MeghanMcCain’s husband @bdomenech is selling these t-shirts? Are they doing it because they support Kamala? Or they’re just being trolls and gremlins? Whoa, I’m gonna really look into this because…it seems super dirty but please please tell me if I’m wrong about it.

    I missed how completely creepy they have become. Sorry, Meghan.”

    https://twitter.com/joanwalsh/status/1142999954715303936

    1. straffinrun

      It’s “dirty” because it’s true?

      1. cyto

        Yeah, I don’t understand the hate at all. It’s not like she is really hiding from it. She spent her entire career being the top cop.

        1. straffinrun

          Which is what made her admission that she smoked pot all the more evil.

          1. cyto

            laws are for the little people.

    2. Count Potato

      woops, Joan Walsh

      No idea how anyone can write anything without preview or edit.

      1. With reckeless abandon, Count.

  30. Pope Jimbo

    Uffda. It is hard to science it up in the #MeToo era.

    She said Sayler told her he was working on a secret government study and that he was one of 25 fitness professionals taking part. She said he told her the study — all video-recorded and documented — involved a fitness professional putting on a heart rate monitor before receiving some sort of “stimulus.”

    But he told her that he was having difficulty with the “stimulus,” claiming he tried with his girlfriend but that he’s seen her naked too many times so it doesn’t increase his heart rate.

    1. This guy has got game! /not really

    2. AlexinCT

      Heh, my gig was that i was writing a book on breastesses. I was surprised how often it worked. Then again, I suspect the women already decided they were going to do it and this was just an easy way for them to justify it in the name of science.

  31. Tundra

    “I dunno, shall we call it a draw?”

    Appropriate.

    1. Festus

      Heh. Tundra’s on a Spoon kick this morning.

    2. Timeloose

      It would be a shame if somethin happend.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_MMHmUGn8Q

      1. Tundra

        Nice.

  32. The Sex Exercise Myth That Won’t Go Away

    Astorino studies high-intensity interval training—intense workouts that involve a lot of grunting and cringing and last just a few minutes—so studying the physiology of sex wasn’t a total departure for him. Two years ago, one of his graduate students, a former football player, told him about receiving the old advice not to “fool around” the night before games. Astorino was indignant. “This doesn’t seem to make physiologic sense,” he recalls thinking.

    So his research team designed a study. They had 12 athletes do exercises (leg curls and extensions) in a gym. The researchers measured the kinetic energy and torque generated on days when the men reported they’d had sex the evening prior, and days they said they hadn’t. Their study, “Effect of Sexual Intercourse on Lower Extremity Muscle Force in Strength-Trained Men” found, contrary to what the title implies, no effect.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      This guy’s study doesn’t sound that much more scientific than the one the personal trainer in Fargo was doing. And at least the Fargo guy was mashing girls’ butts. Not making them do stupid leg curls.

      To each their own, I guess.

    2. ElspethFlashman

      Depends on how much fluid is lost . . . maybe?

      1. AlexinCT

        Yup…

        1. Gustave Lytton

          Or the amount/degree of physical activity during sex?

    3. Chipwooder

      Micky spits on this guy’s study – “Women weaken legs, Rock!”

      1. Pope Jimbo

        um, what exactly is Micky spitting?

  33. Rebel Scum

    Speaking of Liz of the Fauxhicans

    On Friday, Warren re-introduced S. 1940, the Refund Equality Act, which would allow same-sex couples to amend past tax returns. According to a report from the Joint Committee on Taxation, the bill would direct $57 million in refunds. The funds would go to same-sex couples in states that had legalized same-sex marriage before the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013. Warren introduced an earlier version of the bill in 2017.

    “The federal government forced legally married same-sex couples in Massachusetts to file as individuals and pay more in taxes for almost a decade,” Warren said in a statement on the legislation. “We need to call out that discrimination and to make it right — Congress should pass the Refund Equality Act immediately.”

    “It wasn’t until marriage equality became law that gay & lesbian couples could jointly file tax returns—so they paid more in taxes,” Warren tweeted Saturday. “Our government owes them more than $50M for the years our discriminatory tax code left them out. We must right these wrongs.”

    I want all the extra money that was stolen from me before the recent tax cut.

    1. I want all the money that was stolen from me since the 16th amendment.

      1. Donation Not Taxation

        This guy gets it.

    2. Count Potato

      $50M is peanuts

    3. Tonio

      Reparations.

    4. Rhywun

      You get reparations, and you get reparations, …!”

    5. Certified Public Asshat

      What parts of the tax code are not discriminatory in any way?

    6. Gustave Lytton

      As long as we’re swinging for unicorns, add tax credits/deductions for years before they took effect or after they were deleted. I’m gonna have to comb through the records to figure out how much I can claim for my car loans’ interest.

  34. PieInTheSky

    Voracious Black Holes Could Feed Alien Life on Rogue Worlds

    https://www.space.com/black-holes-could-feed-alien-life.html

    1. straffinrun

      You think E.T. would go down on Kamala?

      1. Pope Jimbo

        Well why do you think ET’s finger glows (and smells funky)?

        1. ElspethFlashman

          Eww! /teenage girl

        2. straffinrun

          Willy was radioactive?

      2. Not Adahn

        Having your nostrils on top of your head would be convenient for that.

    2. Not Adahn

      Kurzgesagt has a video about how black holes might be the last resort to sustain civilizations The engineering required to make it happen is less impossible that FTL travel.

      1. The Last American Hero

        I saw a similar documentary 35 years ago.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzUJJKDa558

      2. The Last American Hero

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzUJJKDa558

        I saw a similar documentary a few decades ago.

  35. Tundra

    So…who has been missing the past 6 months, only to return lately?

    For the gutsy gals.

  36. Donation Not Taxation

    “Um…’led to prostitution’? Ma’am, you were already there.”
    Just this weekend, one of the glibertarians.com links articles linked to a piece about a piece in Society for Personality and Social Psychology claiming that one third of heterosexual women have gone on dates because they were interested in the food rather than the male. That is not £1,000 a night or per date, but if it is not the same principle, it is at least in the vicinity.

      1. AlmightyJB

        Did they put out is the real question.

        1. Tejicano

          in other words – what did you have for dessert?

        2. Tonio

          Probably not.

          1. cyto

            Yeah, that was the entire point of the study. they were going on dates with guys they were completely not interested in solely for the purpose of obtaining a free meal. Which, I think we can all agree is a shity thing to do..

          2. commodious spittoon

            No it’s empowering #YASQUEEN #SLAY #FightThePatriarchy #BringOurGirlsHome

        3. ElspethFlashman

          Yes, but there was a still an interest in the food.

          1. Festus

            *golf clap*

          2. Donation Not Taxation

            And Jessica Hyer had “in anterest in” the £1,000

          3. Donation Not Taxation

            How did that happen? I meant: And Jessica Hyer had “an interest in” the £1,000

          4. Raven Nation

            “I mentioned the bisque”

  37. Tundra

    Re: Grandpa Gulag:

    No loans at Metal School!

  38. PieInTheSky

    This year my company replace manual faucets in the restrooms with ones with sensors. In the one closest to my desk, in the last couple of months, one of them worked about 50% of the time. Now it is a bit over a week since only one of two sinks is functional. This puzzles me. I work for a high tech company with billions in revenue, part of a race who has put people on the fucking moon. I would have thought that having a functional faucet is not beyond our capacity. I though wrong.

    1. You had functional faucets.

      Then they put in automatic ones.

    2. Tejicano

      One small step for man (forward or backward?). One giant leap for a plumbing supply company.

  39. Tundra

    And finally:

    But I get an alleged large step toward relief tomorrow morning

    For you.

  40. Count Potato

    Worth reading:

    “The Worst Advice Column Ever Written?
    By Charles C. W. Cooke”

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/worst-advice-column-ever-written/

    1. commodious spittoon

      I’m not convinced that’s not a gun owner trolling an advice columnist. It’s just too on the nose soy. It’s what a right wing troll would write in the voice of a hysterical gun grabbing ninny.

      Maybe I spend too much time reading Twitter.

      1. Chipwooder

        It’s impossible to tell what is satire anymore. I can believe some lefty dolt is terrified of his own daughter shooting him in the middle of the night for no apparent reason.

    2. Donation Not Taxation

      So one of the three options of the ultimatum is to give him the gift of the gun? ZARDOZ, advice column, gift of the gun…

  41. ‘When you look at the page there’s an image of a young attractive man. They make you think that these men are mentors and, that they are going to help you with your career, men who don’t view you in a sexual way.

    ‘When really, sex is usually the end goal.’

    Jess said it soon became apparent that ‘sugar daddy dating’ wasn’t a scenario where an older, wealthy man lavishes a younger girl with gifts or long-term financial support.

    Instead, men were using it as a way to pay students for sex.

    Alright. Lots to unpack here. First off, this chick is supposed to be from the projects, and she doesn’t know what a ho is? Just stop it. Second, what the hell does she think a “sugar daddy” is? Where does she think the term comes from? And finally–and forgive me for burying the lede here–her problem isn’t that she was being used, it’s that she didn’t get to be the user. She was perfectly happy with a scenario where Prince Charming swoops in and starts handing her cash, “helping her with her career”, and does all this as nothing other than a Platonic companion willing to disappear when told to do so. I daresay she’d have had no problem exploiting some lonely old fucker with a bundle of dough and a wistful demeanor willing to stroke her a check so she can hit Burberry or keep her lights on for nothing more than her teasing the possibility of her taking her shirt off or something in the future. So, I mean, I won’t hate the game, but I’m not gonna feel even a little bit sympathetic if the player gets played.

    1. Donation Not Taxation

      If the article is accurate, she admits taking 600 to 1,000 per date and she admits she was in it for the money. We don’t know how much of that gross was profit. I don’t see how the player got played here. As for the “mental health” angle, assuming it is not a con, I hope her therapist is helping her dealing with her cognitive dissonance.

      1. I’m being a touch facetious about her getting the short end. Really, she was just expected to fulfill her end of a somewhat tawdry bargain that she walked into knowingly and repeatedly. Also, I think you’re on to something about the mental health bit being just another con.

        1. cyto

          The best about wanting to help other people, men and women, in the sugar daddy arena definitely sounds like a con.

          it sounds like she did not so much get sick of the business as much as she aged out and not being overly attractive, use was her only angle. Once use goes all she had left was kinky. And I suppose that can get pretty scary pretty fast.

          So now she has only one skill and she can’t really ply that for a lot of money anymore. So she wants to use the experience she has to continue hammering checks. It really isn’t any different from someone working in any other field where are you can only work for so long. Professional athletes become coaches or professional trainers. Professional musicians become teachers or producers.

          And apparently prostitutes become counselors, authors, or life coaches for other prostitutes and Johns.

          1. cyto

            Holy crap Google, thanks for the late edits.

            I used voice dictation on a phone for that bit. And Google changed all sorts of words after I proofed it, as I was hitting the post button. Nice!

            Long story short, her new condo is becoming an advocate.

      2. commodious spittoon

        It’s the Go Fund Me generation. Play the victim, cash in.

      3. Donation Not Taxation

        I am glad to see interest in my comment. Different article, same ‘victim:’ “Jess is now recovering and has set up a support network for fellow ‘sugar babies’ for students turning to sex work to fund university.”
        https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/24/sugar-daddy-dating-fund-uni-left-student-reliant-sex-cash-10034610/ Any ideas on wuzzup wit dat?

        1. to fund university.

          Shouldn’t they now have a useful degree with which to enter their preferred field of work?

          Or did these people prostitute themselves to fund gender studies degrees?

          1. Donation Not Taxation

            Top four suggested finishes when starting with “prostitute majoring in” are (in order): nursing, education, business, and Spanish. Ten year averages by major (http://www.studentsreview.com/salary_by_major.php3)
            Nursing $66,943
            Education $48,905
            Business – Management and Administration $95,199
            Language $55,852
            #learntozoo Zoology $204,124

          2. You can live off of any of those incomes.

          3. Donation Not Taxation

            Part of that would involve avoiding these “20 Most Expensive U.S. Cities to Live In” By Dan Burrows, Contributing Writer | April 26, 2019 https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/real-estate/T006-S001-most-expensive-u-s-cities-to-live-in-2019/index.html

          4. I worked at a courthouse doing scheduling and part of the task involved lining up interpreters where necessary. You know how hotels will typically have a short list of limo and cab services they’ll pull from when someone asks for a car? We had the same, but for interpreters. There’s a sweet spot where you balance obscurity/difficulty and frequency of need, but unless you speak English, Pashto, and nothing else, you’re bound to be turning away gigs for lack of time. You can make a pretty decent living doing that just for the courts, never mind other venues.

    2. Pope Jimbo

      I daresay she’d have had no problem exploiting some lonely old fucker with a bundle of dough and a wistful demeanor

      I watched Ana Nicole Smith on reality TV and this gal is no Ana Nicole Smith!

      1. I think Mme. Nicole-Smith kept her end of the bargain, though, to her, um, credit?

        1. Not Adahn

          So did that last girl who would fuck Hef. Which makes her getting cut out of the will kind of a stain on his legacy.

    3. wdalasio

      Maybe I’m going to sound Victorian here, but perhaps part of the problem is that our society has destigmatized the idea of a woman being a whore or a slut. Any way a woman behaves, at least in certain quarters, is supposed to be okay. At one time, her behavior would be seen as disgraceful and that would have served as some sort of disincentive to all this. But, now, she’s supposed to be able to play men for whatever she can squeeze out of them and any agenda on their part other than “sucker” is an offense against them.

      1. Perhaps a middle ground where there is some form of formal concubinage which does not have the claim on assets that a marital relationship does, being recognized as an economic contract for services.

      2. Don Escaped Texas

        society has destigmatized stupidity

      3. Well, it’s a double-standard. If a hooker takes money from a John and then gets offended because he expects a blowjob, nobody’s sympathetic to the hooker. She and her ilk want to feel like they’re glamorous and desirable and, ideally, have handsome men throw cash at them so they can live a life of ease. They want to trade the bliss of their company in exchange for a living. At least prostitutes have something valuable to exchange.

      4. In fact, riffing off the Victorian bit, she and the rest want to play the part of the glamorous aristocratic coquette. She wants to be carried in a divan from one ball to another, batting her eyes and tossing lace handkerchiefs to gentleman admirers falling all over themselves to be rewarded with a brush of her fingertips across their hands, fighting duels in defense of her honor and virtue. She wants to be paid to be young and pretty, but she wants to be respected, even admired, for it, too.

    4. Chipwooder

      There’s a simple question here: what did she think she was being paid for? Because, if she thought it was just out of the goodness of his heart, then she’s too dumb to breathe.

      1. AlexinCT

        She knows exactly what she was being paid for: she likely is angry because the guy at some point decided she had to now do more than just tease.

        1. Tejicano

          I see the whole thing as a marketing ploy to try to identify a line of Johns for whom she is their type and would be willing to pay the thousand pounds per date which she claims she had been getting.

          1. AlexinCT

            How do you say “Bitch gimme some ass” in cockney?

  42. Count Potato

    “Just-Promoted DCCC Official Has History of Homophobic, Racist Comments”

    https://twitter.com/BrentScher/status/1143137123857514496

    https://freebeacon.com/politics/just-promoted-dccc-official-has-history-of-homophobic-racist-comments/

    Not really, but people would nuts if it was the National Republican Congressional Committee.

    1. Rhywun

      Twitter, working as intended.

    2. commodious spittoon

      I mean I see nothing immediately or perpetually disqualifying but hey it’s your rules we’re just playing by them so #Canceled

  43. Rasilio

    “I dunno, shall we call it a draw?” Both sides realize, the other just won’t seem to quit, and cannot succeed…so maybe a little jaw-jaw? Of course, please note this would be round seven, of this current set of blatherings.

    I disagree, the US could win they are just unwilling to pay the cost of doing so.

    The one thing everyone forgets is that if the US was half as evil as the world seems to think it is we would simply render Afghanistan an uninhabitable wasteland and leave.

    1. ^This. It depends on how you define “win”. If you define it as turning Afghanistan into Canada, it would take a hell of a lot of time, manpower, and focus, but it could be done. At the expense of everything else, but it could be done. If you define win as exterminating the Taliban, it, too, could be done, at tremendous cost in blood and treasure, both to us and to the Afghans, provided we were willing to render the place a smoking pile of ash. Attempting both hasn’t seemed to work out very well, however.

      1. Rasilio

        Actually if we didn’t care about being “the good guys” and were willing to take our often assigned place alongside the Nazi’s as one of the great evils turning Afghanistan into a smoking ruin wouldn’t even cost that much money. It is not like there is anything short of our conscience stopping us from using nuclear and biological weapons on the place.

  44. Count Potato

    I posted this last night while the Minnesota glibs were huddled in their igloos.

    https://twitter.com/TianaTheFirst/status/1142908105119821824

    “Dozens of documents indicate Ilhan Omar lived with Ahmed Hirsi while claiming to be married to Ahmed Elmi

    MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — Dozens of official documents suggest that Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was living with her current husband, Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi, throughout her entire legal marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, contradicting the story she tells to explain her multiple marriages.

    A paper trail of legal documents, however, undermines Omar’s claim that her marriage to Elmi, a British citizen, came during a split from Hirsi. All available evidence suggests that her legal marriage to Elmi notwithstanding, Omar has always been in marital relationship with Hirsi.

    Public documents, for instance, place Hirsi and Omar living in a home together in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis in 2009, the year Elmi and Omar married, and two years before Omar claims she reconciled with Hirsi.

    In legal documents, including 24 traffic violations and misdemeanor charges against Hirsi obtained by the Washington Examiner, Hirsi listed his address at a single Cedar Riverside address consistently in 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Four minor cases against Omar show that in 2007, 2009, and 2012, she listed her address at the same Cedar Riverside address.

    Specifically, local courts listed this address for both Omar and Hirsi in separate traffic violations in mid-2009, the year Omar and Elmi married.

    Omar declined to answer the Washington Examiner’s questions on the matter, and her congressional office declined a request to speak.

    Local media accounts also undermine the idea that Omar and Hirsi split. A 2013 article in the Twin Cities Daily Planet says Omar and Hirsi “moved to North Dakota so that Omar could finish her bachelor’s degree in political science.” Omar began at North Dakota State University in the autumn of 2009 and completed in 2011, the years during which she was allegedly married to Elmi, both legally and religiously.

    A Cedar Riverside local who claims to have worked with Omar on Keith Ellison’s 2008 congressional campaign says that while he had seen Elmi around town, he had never known Omar and Elmi to be together.

    Earlier this month, Minnesota campaign finance officials revealed that Omar and Hirsi jointly filed their taxes together in 2014 and 2015, many years before Omar and Elmi legally divorced. Both federal and Minnesota state law expressly forbid jointly filing taxes with someone who is not a legal spouse.”

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/dozens-of-documents-indicate-ilhan-omar-lived-with-ahmed-hirsi-while-claiming-to-be-married-to-ahmed-elmi

    1. Rhywun

      It’s almost like the MSM aren’t interested in digging into all this publicly-available and in some cases already-widely-reported information or something.

      1. AlexinCT

        Hurts team blue and their narrative. So of course they couldn’t be bothered.

    2. Raphael

      Just nice.

    3. Tundra

      And of course any questions are met with silence or accusations of islamophobia.

      I wonder what happens next election. I’m sure her constituents (with the exceptions of a couple of Glibs) are stupid enough to re-elect the little crook, but maybe they find someone else who checks enough diversity boxes without all the baggage.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        See the response from her spokesman to the story in the Strib below. It is all “This is such racist BS, that I’m not going to answer and you are a racist for even asking”.

        I’m still sort of thinking that a grownup DFL-er will primary her. Now that people have seen how dumb she actually is, they might be more interested in a Margaret Anderson-Keliher.

    4. Gustave Lytton

      Too bad the IRS isn’t actually interested in investigating tax fraud.

      /SLD

  45. The Late P Brooks

    her problem isn’t that she was being used, it’s that she didn’t get to be the user. She was perfectly happy with a scenario where Prince Charming swoops in and starts handing her cash, “helping her with her career”, and does all this as nothing other than a Platonic companion willing to disappear when told to do so.

    GOOOOOAAAALLLL!

  46. DOOMco

    I got a job in the free state.
    Moving is imminent.

    1. You’re going to avoid the disappearing act this time, right?

      1. commodious spittoon

        I don’t know that one. When was it passed?

        1. I tried to look it up, but it was nowhere to be found.

          1. commodious spittoon

            Proposition 414

          2. commodious spittoon

            404! FUCK.

            Been awhile since I’ve seen one.

      2. DOOMco

        That’s the plan!

    2. Raphael

      Congrats, hope the move goes smoothly and good luck on the next venture!

    3. Chipwooder

      Somalia?

    4. Tundra

      Woohoo!

      Well done, DOOM!

      1. DOOMco

        Thanks!
        Packing up now.

    5. Certified Public Asshat

      Congratulations? Sorry?

      *lives in “free state”*

      1. DOOMco

        It’s probably a mixed bag like anything else.

        1. Certified Public Asshat

          What part of the state will you be living in?

          1. DOOMco

            Super south, near Keene.

          2. Not Adahn

            Of course the libertarian would move there.

          3. You’ll be all of two hours away.

          4. Certified Public Asshat

            Wait, I was thinking the OG Free State, not VT.

          5. DOOMco

            I’ll practically be in Massachusetts…

          6. Not Adahn

            NH has parts? Isn’t is smaller than a Houston neighborhood?

          7. All of the state is near us, just not as near as all of Vermont.

          8. Not Adahn

            I was thinking that we should do a Glibs meet up at Porcfest, but apparently we’ve already missed it.

          9. Too political.

          10. DOOMco

            You really want us all on a list.

          11. DOOMco

            Well the speed limits like 35

      2. DOOMco

        North, I assume?

    6. Count Potato

      Congrats!

    7. commodious spittoon

      Ditto congrats. But no state is free. Someone’s paying for it.

      1. DOOMco

        Stupid king’s land rents.

    8. Old Man With Candy

      “The Free State” is (ironically) Maryland.

      1. DOOMco

        It Should be Montana.

      2. Oh hi, I should scroll down more.

  47. Count Potato

    “A good example of why so many Americans people don’t trust the media: The lead story right now on CNN is headlined “Trump says he’s not ready for 2020 loss.” The implication is he will not accept losing the election, peaceful transition etc.

    Trump was also asked specifically about whether he’d accept the results of the election. And he explicitly said yes, 100%. See the part from the transcript below. That was left out of the entire CNN story. Best case – mistake. Worst case – malpractice. 3/ https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/23/politics/donald-trump-2020-election-not-prepared-loss/index.html …”

    https://twitter.com/SteveKrak/status/1142906217922224129

    1. commodious spittoon

      Can’t have a third term if your second term never ended.

      /Roll Safe meme

  48. Count Potato

    BREAKING: Eric Swalwell is an extraterrestrial turnip.

    “”I think it’s so appropriate that you gave us all the same T-shirt because I believe our candidates are a part of the Avengers. We’re here to save America! The Republicans — that’s the Hunger Games.”

    Rep. @EricSwalwell speaks at Rep. Jim Clyburn’s fishfry in Columbia, SC.”

    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1142556618770378752

    1. Rebel Scum

      Bless his heart.

    2. Gustave Lytton

      Rep. Jim Clyburn

      father of former FCC Commissioner Filet Mignon Clyburn. Good thing we don’t have nepotism in this country.

  49. The Late P Brooks

    I’m not convinced that’s not a gun owner trolling an advice columnist. It’s just too on the nose soy. It’s what a right wing troll would write in the voice of a hysterical gun grabbing ninny.

    That “advice column” reads to me like some after school special morality play created out of whole cloth by that dumb bitch from Moms Demand Action.

    Next chapter- “And then my precious baby girl came to her senses and gave me the gun. The two of us took it down to the Heroes of Freedom Bridge and threw it into the river where it can never hurt anyone. We had a good cry, and went home for ice cream and s’mores. Finally, I could sleep with my bedroom door open. That night, she came into my room, and we had The Most Awesome Night. Better sex than her mother and I ever had. I owe it all to you.”

    1. commodious spittoon

      “I just want what’s best for her: getting raped at knife-point by a home invader. At least she won’t have his death on her conscience.”

  50. The Late P Brooks

    I got a job in the free state.
    Moving is imminent.

    You’re going to work for Allied Van Lines?

    1. Certified Public Asshat

      Or Mayflower.

  51. Juvenile Bluster

    Gorsuch is the best justice on SCOTUS and it’s not close, part a lot.

    In our constitutional order, a vague law is no law at all. Only the people’s elected representatives in Congress have the power to write new federal criminal laws. And when Congress exercises that power, it has to write statutes that give ordinary people fair warning about what the law demands of them. Vague laws transgress both of these constitutional requirements. They hand off the legislature’s responsibility for defining criminal behavior to unelected prosecutors and judges, and they leave people with no sure way to know what consequences will attach to their conduct. When Congress passes a vague law, the role of courts under our Constitution is not to fashion a new, clearer law to take its place, but to treat the law as a nullity and invite Congress to try again

    1. commodious spittoon

      Roberts must be furious.

      1. Raston Bot

        fuck him.

        Gorsuch is the libertarian swing jurist so desperately needed. he’ll vote for property rights and against the administrative state, then turn around and vote to bolster the 4A and due process.

        i almost don’t want Trump to replace Ginsburg to keep the 4-4 split.

        Kagan is still an embarrassment and the laughing stock of the court.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          Kagan is still an embarrassment and the laughing stock of the court.

          What color is the sky on your planet. I don’t like her jurisprudence, but please list me the embarassing things that she’s done, or the times she’s gone off the rails and had people laugh at her.

          She’s the least cringy of all the justices on the left wing of the court.

          1. AlexinCT

            Low bar there man…

    2. Juvenile Bluster

      This case, by the way, voided a law regarding heightened sentencing for some firearms violations. Gorsuch joined the 4 liberal justices in blocking the law. The 4 other “conservative” judges would have upheld the law.

      1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

        I’m not sure you have the numbers right on that. I read an article about that this weekend and it didn’t say that it came down 5-4 (I would be really really really surprised if Ginsburg put principles above her noted dislike of guns). Do you have a link to the case?

        1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

          My mistake. I guess Thomas put his dislike of criminal defendants before his support for guns. Even worse

        2. Juvenile Bluster

          The decision just came down 20 minutes ago, so nothing from this past weekend would’ve had the numbers.

          https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-431_7758.pdf

          1. R C Dean

            Non-delegation, here we come!

      2. A Leap at the Wheel

        What a time to be alive.

    3. Rebel Scum

      I’ll be in my bunk.

    4. Donation Not Taxation

      The D’s overplayed their hand with Brett Kavanaugh, so it is politically impossible to get traction from criticizing President Donald J. Trump for nominating someone who was not on the list and “not close” to the Gorsuch already delivered. However, keep in mind that even Gorsuch is no Darrell Castle. Imagine: ‘The statute at issue in this case was signed by the President and before that passed by Congress. 1A says ‘Congress shall pass no law.’ Are you suggesting that these precedents you have cited supersede the Constitution?’

  52. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

    So, no celebrities have been demanding boycotts of the UK for the state forcing a woman to terminate a pregnancy? Seems like “choice” is not the operative objective of most people in the abortion debate

    1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      The Liberal discredits Liberalism.

    2. Chipwooder

      I thought they said we should all “trust women!!!”?

  53. Juvenile Bluster

    More SCOTUS; Iancu v. Brunetti. Less interesting for the case itself than for the lineup:

    KAGAN, J. delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, GINSBURG, ALITO, GORSUCH and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined.

    1. Juvenile Bluster

      Respondent Erik Brunetti sought federal registration of the trademark FUCT. The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied his application under a provision of the Lanham Act that prohibits registration of trademarks that “[c]onsist of or comprise immoral or scandalous matter,” 15 U. S. C. §1052(a). Brunetti brought a First Amendment challenge to the “immoral or scandalous” bar in the Federal Circuit, which invalidated the provision. Held: The Lanham Act’s prohibition on registration of “immoral or scandalous” trademarks violates the First Amendment.

      1. AlexinCT

        I thought government already had a patent on that FUCT thing considering that is what they do to us…

  54. The Late P Brooks

    In our constitutional order, a vague law is no law at all.

    Crazy talk! All the best laws are vague, in order that they may be interpreted and enforced in the most arbitrary and capricious way possible That’s how you achieve the maximum political benefit.

    1. Juvenile Bluster

      Gorsuch is the most libertarian justice of my lifetime. Trump may have been worth it just to get him on the Court.

      1. DOOMco

        I’ve been pretty pleased with the scotus, hoping this keeps up.

      2. Kavanaugh is mixed, but Gorsuch is solid.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          And yet, he’s already a better pick than anyone GW picked, and undoubtedly better than anyone McCain, Romney, jeb at all would have picked. The only R that ran for president in the last 20 years I could see doing better are Cruz and maybe (MAYBE) Rand.

  55. The Late P Brooks

    Bad Orange Man is Bad

    So, what’s up with Trump? He is likely considering the possibility that that he could lose re-election in 2020, and it’s causing him to question some of his decisions. And Trump, who tweets poll numbers when he thinks they are positive — as he did last Saturday — has good reason to be nervous.
    A Monmouth University poll released this past week found that only 37% of Americans believe Trump should be re-elected. And worse for Trump, nearly 60% believe “it is time to have someone new in the Oval Office.”

    ————

    Trump losing in 2016 would’ve no doubt been painful for him. But Trump losing re-election in 2020 would be horribly embarrassing. After all, he would be the first sitting President since George H.W. Bush in 1992 not to be re-elected.
    Instead of being able to market himself as the best president ever, he would forever be seen as a loser. And that might just be Trump’s greatest fear — and the very reason for his un-Trumpian behavior.

    Trump is trying to pull the wool over your eyes, America. He’s trying to trick you into thinking he’s not a dictator. Or something.

    Let’s say, just for the sake of argument, those poll numbers are not complete and utter bullshit. That means Trumphitler is acting in his own self interest. When has he ever not done so? Out of character? What nonsense.

    1. DOOMco

      Oh no, a one term president?!?!

    2. AlexinCT

      When a real leftist dictator that rules with the pen, weaponizes the three letter agencies and sicks them on his personal and political opponents, goes after anyone that reports how corrupt his administration is, and generally encourages show trials that always let the connected off the hook while jailing people under false charges (the video made the people in Libya spontaneously riot!) – just to name a few real banana republic shit – is in charge, these people are totes for tyrannical rulership. Pretending Trump is doing anything like this is just more progjection.

      1. Rhywun

        And don’t forget he’s still sitting on a mountain of evidence detailing all of that. The American public isn’t going to know what hit them.

        1. Because none of it will be covered in the news, and it will instead be “Trump Jails political opponants”

          1. AlexinCT

            Twitter will have to deplatform him once he starts spamming these details…

  56. The Late P Brooks

    Stupid king’s land rents.

    *picks up stick, pokes hits RobC with it*

  57. The Late P Brooks

    Gorsuch is the most libertarian justice of my lifetime. Trump may have been worth it just to get him on the Court.

    *Inspector Clouseau, on the roof trying to get a better look through the maid’s window as she changes into her nightdress, falls, lands on diving board and is catapulted through a second story window just in time to thwart the jewel robbery*

    1. ChipsnSalsa

      He had a good list given to him and he picked a good name off the list. So he picked a good person / team to compile the list, rather than picking the candidates themselves.

      Either way, I’ll take it.

  58. Pope Jimbo

    The local paper finally ran a story on Ilhan Omar and her ongoing marriage problems.

    It would be a fairly devastating story if they wanted it to be. Instead, they put Omar’s denials at the top and bury all the discrepancies way at the bottom. For her part, Omar is sticking with the “this is all a bunch of racist bs and that is all I’m saying” defense:

    Omar spokesman Jeremy Slevin issued a statement Friday asserting that the questions about her personal life are illegitimate:

    “Since before she was elected to office, Ilhan has been the subject of conspiracy theories and false accusations about her personal life. Emboldened by a president who openly treats immigrants, refugees and Muslims as invaders, these attacks often stem from the presumption that Ilhan — like others who share those identities — is somehow illegitimate or not fully American.

    “Ilhan has shared more than most public officials ever do about the details of her personal life — even when it is personally painful,” he continued. “Whether by colluding with right-wing outlets to go after Muslim elected officials or hounding family members, legitimate media outlets have a responsibility not to fan the flames of hate. Continuing to do so is not only demeaning to Ilhan, but to her entire family.”

    1. Chipwooder

      Maybe it’s a sign of me getting old, but the predilection of leftists to refer to politicians by their first names, as if we’re all just buddy-buddy chums, really annoys me.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        -1 Beer Summit

    2. Rhywun

      a president who openly treats immigrants, refugees and Muslims as invaders

      Yawn.

      What’s your boss’s solution?

    3. Count Potato

      “MUST READ: Luke Rosiak has a new thread up on Ilhan Omar and IT’S DEVASTATING”

      https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/06/23/must-read-luke-rosiak-has-a-new-thread-up-on-ilhan-omar-and-its-devastating-a/

      In other news, I once lined a hamster cage with the Star Tribune. So he chewed through the bars and escaped.

      1. commodious spittoon

        Omfg you bigots get over it and #MoveOn

      2. Pope Jimbo

        A really enterprising journalist would start looking into the finances of her sister’s company in Kenya. What are the odds that she is getting all sorts of NGO and govt grants and funding because of who her sister is?

        I wouldn’t be surprised if there is a Clinton Foundation Jr. in the offing there.

    4. “marriage problems” Meaning she may or may not have had sex with her brother.

      The current scandal is whether she had an orgasm or not.

      Care to comment as a Minneglib?

      1. Pope Jimbo

        Get your mind out of the gutter Q!

        I’m sure as an upstanding woman who always wears her hijab like a proper muslim, she had a clittorectomy a long time ago so there is no possibility of an orgasm.

    5. R C Dean

      So, I get it – she committed fraud of some kind with her hinky “marrriage”. Including tax fraud, but I suspect that was incidental. My question is, why did she do it? Immigration fraud? Some kind of financial fraud?

      1. Count Potato

        Why not both? In for a penny, in for a pound.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        My gut feel is that it was some sort of immigration fraud to get Elmi in the states as quickly as possible. I’m not sure he’s her brother, but I think he is some sort of family relative.

      3. Urthona

        Immigration fraud. Clearly. She wanted to get a relative into this country from a middle eastern shithole.

    6. Gustave Lytton

      When Omar is ready to be cast aside, I’m sure they’re be first in line to explain how they were at the forefront of exposing her checkered past.

  59. Rufus the Monocled

    I’m proud of ‘Grandpa Gulag’. I can’t trademark it but it belongs to the world now. Use it responsibly. Preferably when drunk.

    Let the commie bastards have it.

    1. AKA:

      LIFE IS HORSESHIT

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        “Sadly, if I left my spouse, I suspect that my relationship with my lover would also end.”

        Cake and eat it too or something.

    2. Chipwooder

      bahahahaha….”Next, let me detail for you the variety of lint from my navel….”

  60. The Late P Brooks

    Omar spokesman Jeremy Slevin issued a statement Friday asserting that the questions about her personal life are illegitimate:

    “Donald Trump, during some ill-defined time period more than twenty years ago, may or may not have grabbed some unspecified part of my anatomy (or maybe just maybe made me feel a little queasy in my tummy), and I have been repressing that memory holding this unproveable allegation in reserve since then,” on the other hand, is just cause to unleash the media hounds.

    1. R C Dean

      questions about her personal life

      What about questions about whether she violated the law.

      Because filing joint tax returns with someone you aren’t married to is a violation of the law.

      If technical tax violations were good enough for Al Capone, they’re good enough for Omar.

  61. The Late P Brooks

    I woke up early on the day of my 30th wedding anniversary and made love with the beautiful man lying beside me. His eyes are bright and young and I love the way he smells in the morning. I love the way he moves his hips and I love to feel his well-toned body against mine.

    My husband woke up that morning in our marital bed, alone. I have been having an affair for close to three years. My lover is also married, although he stopped sleeping with his wife two years ago. I continue having sex with my husband, but it’s a chore, not unlike a gynaecological exam.

    I do it to keep the peace. I think if I refuse entirely, my marriage will end, and I’m not ready for that. I’m still financially dependent and it’s scary to think about a life alone after being married for 30 years.

    So, I decided to look for a partner who would fulfill my need for sex in a way that didn’t feel like a debt or an obligation, and would recharge my battery instead of drain it.

    How romance.

    Such lovely.

    Totally not a whore. I wonder how she would react if hubby came home one day and announced he was running away with the 25 year old cutie he’s putting through law school.

    1. Chipwooder

      The same way that the recent story (CNN I think? But I’m not certain) about the middle-aged woman with a husband and kids who “bravely” ditched her family because she decided that she was gay. Had her husband kicked her to the curb for a younger woman, he’d be reviled as an asshole, but she is stunning and brave.

    2. commodious spittoon

      Hey, at least her husband gets to keep the marital bed and wasn’t banished to the cuck shed. Compromise!

    3. R C Dean

      I’m still financially dependent

      You are a bad person. You do bad things. You should feel bad.

      1. Chipwooder

        “I’m more than happy to keep sponging off this man so long as I’m banging someone else”

    4. Rebel Scum

      Saw this story awhile back. What a bitch.

    1. Chipwooder

      This is a good first step, but doesn’t go nearly far enough. Maybe they can exhume her and drag her skeleton behind a car for a while.

      1. Gustave Lytton

        And blacklist everyone who ever starred in a movie with her. Or watched a movie of her’s.

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      Amazing.

      When they went after Kate Smith you knew something was seriously off with this nutcases.

      The Flyers and Yankees were fools and should have stood their ground.

    3. “We had to remove Ron Silver’s name from the Ron Silver Theatre because he was the bad guy in TimeCop.”

    4. State University? Hmmm. Maybe DeWine (ugh) can rescind some arts funding until they restore the name.

  62. The Late P Brooks

    This just came on. I haven’t heard it for decades.

  63. The Late P Brooks

    “Lillian Gish Name Removed From Campus Theater For ‘Birth Of A Nation’ Role”

    No one is innocent!

  64. AlexinCT

    Woke Wars“.

    I do admit I never knew restaurants could be gay, so I learned me something new today.

    1. commodious spittoon

      You know what else is gay? Masturbating. Think about it, you’re simultaneously pleasuring and receiving pleasure from a man. Super gay. The only way to make it not gay is to think about Clint Eastwood, the straightest man alive, and whisper No Homo the whole time.

      1. AlexinCT

        What if you do it with your off hand to make it feel like it is a stranger doing it? Still gay and requiring the Clint Eastwood move to normalize? Do I need to ask a homeless person for this advice?

      2. R C Dean

        ‘S all good. My hand identifies as a vagina.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          Only after cleaning fish.

          1. AlexinCT

            Rosie palm and the 5 sisters, man!

    2. Pope Jimbo

      I think I see the problem. The homeless activists heard that someone had put a lock on an alcove. Then they realized that it was a Japanese restaurant and a rock.

    1. “permission”

      -> I will leave you and divorce rape you if you don’t let me take a mile of dick.

      1. AlexinCT

        Her husband was likely taking dick too. Maybe he is keeping quiet cause he got more than she did?

        1. Rasilio

          Actually the article says he was banging a younger chick the whole time.

          His real mistake was not agreeing to this, it was ditching the younger chick and getting back together with the nutjob writer after the year was up

      2. Tonio

        Meh. While it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, apparently some guys get into being cucked. Suspect that many of those guys are BDSM bottoms for their wives and see cucking as another form of humiliation.

        1. Rasilio

          That is literally the definition of a cuck in the BDSM scene.

          If you are not actually humiliated by your wife getting banged by another dude then you by definition are not a Cuck

      1. R C Dean

        When you sacrifice your marriage as a PR stunt to promote your book, you are a bad person, etc.

        1. How much money we talking here?

          I mean, no human is unique enough to be “The One”, I’d be more than happy to sell out that fantasy for the right price.

          Especially if I can get paid for writing an expose about my slutiness. It’s like porn with no cameras.

      2. commodious spittoon

        By the end of her wild oats year, Rinaldi racked up 12 new lovers. She tried sex with a woman and in a threesome. But her biggest gains, she says, were not about sex. “I got back in touch with the adventurous, life-loving girl I once was.”

        Resuming the marriage fulltime proved tricky. When she found out her husband had been seriously involved with one woman, Rinaldi flew into a rage. “It was the darkest moment of the entire project. I’m not proud of it.”

        Le gasp.

  65. The Late P Brooks

    Speaking of “one term President” Trump: If I lost an election to any of those stiffs, I think some sort of ritual suicide would be the only possible response. accompanied by an admonition that America was going to get what they voted for, good and hard.

    1. Don Escaped Texas

      America was going to get what they voted for, good and hard.

      either way, worry not

      1. “either way, worry not”

        False vacuum crisis or heat death, we’re finished either way.

  66. The Late P Brooks

    *Kagan is still an embarrassment and the laughing stock of the court.*

    What color is the sky on your planet. I don’t like her jurisprudence, but please list me the embarassing things that she’s done, or the times she’s gone off the rails and had people laugh at her.

    She’s the least cringy of all the justices on the left wing of the court.

    I think/hope maybe you’re thinking of Sotomayor. Sotomayor is at least good on 4A stuff.

    Kagan was Obama’s White House counsel, if I recall; correctly. Motivated by nothing but political advantage and might-makes-right, end-justifies-the-means outcomes..

    1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      It depends how you look at it. If you think being pro-criminal defendant is better than supporting free speech and freedom of association then Sotomayor is good. If you think that being a strong vote for free speech and freedom of association is more important than being just mildly pro-criminal defendant than Kagan is leaps and bounds better

      1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

        Just a refresher, Sotomayor is a reliable vote to silence wrong thought. She and Ginsburg were the only justices who thought it was appropriate for the government to mandate speech for private organizations that are disfavored. She, again with Ginsburg, were also the only justices who thought that it was fine for government to use religious animus as a basis to drive a bakery out of business.

        I guess with the right amount of mental gymnastics criminalizing wrong thought can still be compatible with being pro-criminal defendant.

    2. A Leap at the Wheel

      Sotomayor is a spaz with all the fire and brimstone of Scallia, but none of the, you know, analytical chops, writing skill, or persuasion of Scallia. Soto *is* better on 4A, but she’ at heart far stronger might-makes-right, ends-justify-the-means jurist than Kagen. She has no consistant methodlogy (which is a major flaw of the aggregate of progressive jursits and legal thinkers these days).

      Kagen follows a pretty borring, formalist methodology that usually leads to her perfered outcome, and she focuses on the kind of arcana that most people on the street don’t know about and aren’t persuaded by. She has the closest thing to a consistant methodlolgy as any progressive legal thinkinger out there. She’s literally the female, older, other-side-of-the-political-spectrum version Kavenaugh.

    3. Kagan is less intelligent than the average middle school teacher, and has about as much Constitutional knowledge as well. She was chosen because she’s a reliable left-wing vote and easily controlled.

  67. The Late P Brooks

    So- consensus view is that Supreme Court justices with whom we do not agree are unprincipled hacks motivated by preconceived notions of “justice”?

    Fair enough.

    1. A Leap at the Wheel

      I can’t engage in a conversation with you while you insist on fucking up comment threading.

      1. Cripple fight!

    2. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      You obviously didn’t read my response.

      If you think a justice’s view on the 4th Amendment to be more important than a justice’s view on the 1st Amendment- then Sotomayor is your justice.

      If you think a justice’s view on the 1st Amendment to be more important than how closely they adhere to the 4th Amendment (Kagan is still pretty good on the 4th Amendment)- then Kagan is your justice.

      I think you already have a preconceived conclusion between the two justices, so maybe this doesn’t matter.

  68. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/23/world/europe/abortion-mentally-disabled-uk.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

    FTA:

    But the judge said she had to act in the woman’s “best interests, not on society’s views of termination.”

    The British charity Life, which says its mission is to create a society that “has the utmost respect for all human life from fertilization,” said in a Facebook post that the decision was “truly horrendous.” Commentators on the site described it as “terrible” and “devastating.”

    “That is wrong on every level; doesn’t mean baby will have learning difficulties,” another person wrote on the Facebook page of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.

    A spokeswoman for the British group Abortion Rights, which she said campaigned “to keep options open for the many women who willingly choose to end their pregnancies,” described the case in a telephone call on Sunday as not unprecedented but “really sad and complex.”

    The group’s chairwoman, Kerry Abel, said in an email statement: “As heartbreaking as this case is, it is opportunistic for antichoice organizations to use it to attack a woman’s right to choose. One in three women will have an abortion in the U.K. for many, many individual reasons, and we shouldn’t undermine free, safe, legal abortion based on one difficult case.”

    1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      “Choice” ends when government imposes the “right” decision

    2. Gustave Lytton

      Next year is the centenary of the 1920 Firearms Act. Brits should celebrate by turning in their removed balls.

    3. I <3 eugenics.

    1. DOOMco

      Good.

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        Oh shit, I missread it. They are saying that being suicidal in 2006 *IS* a bar to a healthy, reabilitiated person buying a gun in 2013.

        Beers cannot distinguish his circumstances by arguing
        that he is no longer a danger to himself or to others.
        Acceptance of his argument would sidestep the ruling we made
        in Binderup
        that neither passage of time nor evidence of
        rehabilitation “can restore Second Amendment rights that were
        forfeited.”51 Instead, the only way Beers can distinguish his
        circumstances is by demonstrating that he was never
        determined to be a danger to himself or to others. This Beers
        cannot do

        stare decisis over constitutional considerations? Paging Justice Thomas. Justace Thomas to the blue courtesy phone.

        1. Gustave Lytton

          passage of time nor evidence of
          rehabilitation “can restore Second Amendment rights that were
          forfeited

          Everyone was under 18 once, so you still can’t own a firearm.

          1. DOOMco

            And you’ll die at some point. They should probably just estate tax you now.

        2. DOOMco

          Fucking hell.

          1. A Leap at the Wheel

            Don’t worry, when someone you love avoids mental health treatment because they want to avoid a lifetime ban on firearms for a temporary medical condition, the 3rd circuit has you covered:

            Nothing in our opinion should be read as perpetuating
            the stigma surrounding mental illness. Although Beers may
            now be rehabilitated, we do not consider this fact in the context
            of the very circumscribed, historical inquiry we must conduct
            at step one. Historically, our forebearers saw a danger in
            providing mentally ill individuals the right to possess guns.
            That understanding requires us to conclude that § 922(g)(4) is
            constitutional as applied to Beers

            So they aren’t perpetuating the stigma. Got that?

          2. DOOMco

            Of course not.
            And it’s not like anyone would ever target a person they know to be unarmed.

          3. A Leap at the Wheel

            Look lady, I know you have battered woman syndrome (is that still considered a thing) because your husband used your head for a punching bag, but now that you left him and spent some time in a mental health clinic, you are much better.

            Also he’s mad at you and wants to kill you. Here is a cell phone. Police are only 30 or 40 minutes away if you call for help. PS only call for help during the day, we don’t staff as heavily over night.

        3. commodious spittoon

          Wishing to own a firearm is evidence of psychological unfitness to own a firearm. QED.

        4. I’m sure this will do wonders for depressed people, especially veterans, to seek treatment.

          1. A Leap at the Wheel

            Good thing returning vets have no life expereince 1) avoiding beurocracy 2) drilling into them the importance of keeping firearms available, and 3) sky-high suicide rates.

          2. AlexinCT

            I suspect shit like this is by design. The VA banks on most vets not talking about problems during their service years because then the VA would be liable to provide them with services to help. I am lucky never to need anything from those cunts because I can afford my own insurance. And I constantly tell idiots that if they think the VA is bad today, wait until government controls all healthcare ala Grandpa Marx.

    2. So: you were previously incarcerated and, thus, forfeited your rights. Therefore, if you are caught speeding, the 5th, 6th and 8th amendment no longer apply and the cop can pistol whip you, castrate you and drag you behind his squad car until you’re dead.

      Totes logically consistent.

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        The funny thing is, the logic the court is using is that we used to lock up ‘lunitics’ so we didn’t have any laws that removed the right to own firearms from mentally ill people. Taking away a gun < locking you in a cage, ergo we are gong to do that for the rest of your life.

  69. The Late P Brooks

    I’m not qualified to comment on matters involving the Supreme Court. I am not an Ivy League Constitutional scholar, and I do not obsessively pore over decisions in order to keep box scores on which team is winning.

    I have a life, such as it is.

    I abandon the field.

  70. The Late P Brooks

    Nor am I a religious zealot.

    1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

      That trademark case that just came out put the two justices in stark contrast. Highlights pretty well the difference between the two.

      1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

        Sotomayor defending concepts of “immoral” and “scandalous” to allow the government more authority over trademarks doesn’t make her a religious zealot. The First Amendment is so gauche

        1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

          She cites Chaplinsky in her opinion. LOL

          1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

            chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf

            chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1140_5368.pdf

          2. Raston Bot

            Kagan and Sotomayor both joined the dissent in Becerra.

            from Mastepiece:

            * JUSTICE GORSUCH disagrees. In his view, the Jack cases and the Phillips case must be treated the same because the bakers in all thosecases “would not sell the requested cakes to anyone.” Post, at 4. That description perfectly fits the Jack cases—and explains why the bakers there did not engage in unlawful discrimination. But it is a surprisingcharacterization of the Phillips case, given that Phillips routinely sells wedding cakes to opposite-sex couples. JUSTICE GORSUCH can make the claim only because he does not think a “wedding cake” is the relevantproduct. As JUSTICE GORSUCH sees it, the product that Phillips refused to sell here—and would refuse to sell to anyone—was a “cake celebrat-ing same-sex marriage.” Ibid.; see post, at 3, 6, 8–9. But that is wrong.The cake requested was not a special “cake celebrating same-sexmarriage.” It was simply a wedding cake—one that (like other stand-ard wedding cakes) is suitable for use at same-sex and opposite-sexweddings alike.

            the cake has special significance to the baker. i’m not sure how i view the cake.

            but you have provided enough support for me to review how i feel about Sotomayor. but i’m still really not a fan of Kagan’s. and we’ll see the real clash between her vs Gorsuch over Chevron.

          3. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

            Apart from the cake question. Kagan sided with the 7-2 majority to find that religious animus played a role in Phillips being targeted. Sotomayor was cool with the religious animus stuff. That is what I was referencing with that ruling

            People always forget all the clauses in the 1st Amendment

  71. Raston Bot

    how Kagan wraps up her dissent in KNICK v. TOWNSHIP OF SCOTT, PENNSYLVANIA:

    Just last month, when the Court overturned another longstanding precedent, JUSTICE BREYER penned a dissent. He wrote of the dangers of reversing legal course “only because five Members of a later Court” decide that an earlier ruling was incorrect. He concluded: “Today’s decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next.” Well, that didn’t take long. Now one may wonder yet again.

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-647_m648.pdf

    1. Gustave Lytton

      Muh precendent!

    2. ChipsnSalsa

      So a SC case should be held with higher regard than the Constitution?

      nice.

      1. “Tulsi Gabbard Apologist”

        The only time precedent matters is when it is an unenumerated right that is in fashion. You expect them to care about enumerated rights too?

    3. Rebel Scum

      +1 Super-precedent